hunt
washington
apple
advertising
argued
february
decided
june
appellee
statutory
agency
promotion
protection
washington
state
apple
industry
composed
state
growers
dealers
chosen
electoral
districts
fellow
growers
dealers
mandatory
assessments
finance
appellee
operations
brought
suit
challenging
constitutionality
north
carolina
statute
requiring
apples
sold
shipped
north
carolina
closed
containers
identified
grade
containers
applicable
federal
grade
designation
apples
graded
district
granted
requested
injunctive
declaratory
relief
holding
appellee
standing
challenge
statute
jurisdictional
amount
satisfied
challenged
statute
unconstitutionally
discriminated
commerce
insofar
affected
interstate
shipment
washington
apples
held
appellee
standing
bring
action
representational
capacity
pp
association
standing
bring
suit
behalf
members
members
otherwise
standing
sue
right
interests
seeks
protect
germane
organization
purpose
neither
claim
asserted
relief
requested
requires
participation
lawsuit
individual
members
warth
seldin
pp
prerequisites
associational
standing
described
warth
clearly
present
risk
otherwise
losing
north
carolina
accounts
washington
apple
growers
dealers
cost
obliterated
washington
state
grades
large
volume
north
containers
stopped
using
preprinted
containers
thus
diminishing
efficiency
marketing
operations
appellee
attempt
remedy
injuries
central
purpose
protecting
enhancing
washington
apple
market
neither
appellee
constitutional
claim
relief
requested
requires
individualized
proof
pp
though
appellee
state
agency
account
precluded
asserting
claims
state
apple
growers
dealers
since
practical
purposes
appellee
performs
functions
traditional
trade
association
apple
growers
members
appellee
traditional
trade
association
sense
possess
indicia
organization
membership
electing
members
ones
serve
commission
financing
activities
consequence
membership
assessments
mandatory
pp
appellee
interests
may
adversely
affected
outcome
litigation
since
annual
assessments
used
support
activities
tied
production
washington
apples
reduced
market
apples
declines
result
north
carolina
statute
requirements
satisfied
since
appellee
standing
litigate
constituents
claims
may
rely
meet
requisite
amount
controversy
appear
legal
certainty
claims
least
individual
growers
dealers
come
amount
view
substantial
annual
sales
volume
washington
apples
north
carolina
million
continuing
nature
statute
interference
washington
apple
industry
coupled
evidence
record
growers
dealers
suffered
continue
suffer
losses
various
types
operation
challenged
statute
paul
mercury
indemnity
red
cab
pp
north
carolina
statute
violates
commerce
clause
burdening
discriminating
interstate
sale
washington
apples
pp
statute
raises
costs
business
north
carolina
market
washington
growers
dealers
leaving
unaffected
north
carolina
counterparts
still
free
market
apples
federal
grade
none
pp
statute
strips
washington
apple
industry
competitive
economic
advantages
earned
expensive
stringent
mandatory
state
inspection
grading
system
exceeds
federal
requirements
requiring
washington
apples
sold
inferior
grades
federal
counterparts
north
carolina
statute
offers
north
carolina
apple
industry
sort
protection
competition
commerce
clause
designed
prohibit
pp
even
statute
intended
discriminatory
enacted
declared
purpose
protecting
consumers
deception
fraud
multiplicity
state
grades
statute
remarkably
little
goal
least
respect
washington
apples
grades
permits
marketing
apples
closed
containers
grades
nothing
purify
flow
information
retail
level
moreover
washington
grades
led
type
deception
statute
assertedly
aimed
since
grades
equal
surpass
comparable
federal
standards
pp
nondiscriminatory
alternatives
outright
ban
washington
state
grades
readily
available
burger
delivered
opinion
members
joined
except
rehnquist
took
part
consideration
decision
case
john
jordan
argued
cause
appellants
brief
rufus
edmisten
attorney
general
north
carolina
millard
rich
deputy
attorney
general
slade
gorton
attorney
general
washington
argued
cause
appellee
brief
edward
mackie
deputy
attorney
general
james
arneil
special
assistant
attorney
general
chief
justice
burger
delivered
opinion
north
carolina
enacted
statute
required
inter
alia
closed
containers
apples
sold
offered
sale
shipped
state
bear
grade
applicable
grade
standard
stat
action
brought
washington
state
apple
advertising
commission
federal
district
invalidated
statute
insofar
prohibited
display
washington
state
apple
grades
ground
unconstitutionally
discriminated
interstate
commerce
specific
questions
presented
appeal
whether
commission
standing
bring
action
whether
satisfied
requirement
whether
challenged
north
carolina
statute
constitutes
unconstitutional
burden
interstate
commerce
washington
state
nation
largest
producer
apples
crops
accounting
approximately
apples
grown
domestically
nearly
half
apples
shipped
closed
containers
interstate
commerce
might
expected
production
sale
apples
scale
multimillion
dollar
enterprise
plays
significant
role
washington
economy
importance
apple
industry
state
legislature
undertaken
protect
enhance
reputation
washington
apples
establishing
stringent
mandatory
inspection
program
administered
state
department
agriculture
requires
apples
shipped
interstate
commerce
tested
strict
quality
standards
graded
accordingly
cases
washington
state
grades
gained
substantial
acceptance
trade
equivalent
superior
comparable
grades
standards
adopted
department
agriculture
usda
compliance
washington
inspection
scheme
costs
state
growers
approximately
million
year
addition
inspection
program
state
legislature
sought
enhance
market
washington
apples
creation
state
agency
washington
state
apple
advertising
commission
charged
statutory
duty
promoting
protecting
state
apple
industry
commission
composed
washington
apple
growers
dealers
nominated
elected
within
electoral
districts
fellow
growers
dealers
rev
code
among
activities
promotion
washington
apples
domestic
foreign
markets
advertising
market
research
analysis
public
education
well
scientific
research
uses
development
improvement
apples
activities
financed
entirely
assessments
levied
upon
apple
industry
year
litigation
began
assessments
totaled
approximately
million
assessments
initially
fixed
statute
increased
upon
majority
vote
apple
growers
north
carolina
board
agriculture
adopted
administrative
regulation
unique
effect
required
closed
containers
apples
shipped
sold
state
display
either
applicable
usda
grade
notice
indicating
classification
state
grades
expressly
prohibited
addition
obvious
consequence
prohibiting
display
washington
state
apple
grades
containers
apples
shipped
north
carolina
regulation
presented
washington
apple
industry
marketing
problem
potentially
nationwide
significance
washington
apple
growers
annually
ship
commerce
approximately
million
closed
containers
apples
nearly
eventually
find
way
north
carolina
stamped
applicable
washington
state
variety
grade
industry
practice
purchase
containers
preprinted
various
apple
varieties
grades
prior
harvest
containers
filled
apples
appropriate
type
grade
substantial
portion
placed
warehouses
grade
labels
identify
product
facilitate
handling
apples
shipped
needed
throughout
year
february
year
constitute
approximately
apples
sold
fresh
markets
country
since
ultimate
destination
apples
unknown
time
placed
storage
compliance
north
carolina
unique
regulation
required
washington
growers
obliterate
printed
labels
containers
shipped
north
carolina
thus
giving
product
damaged
appearance
alternatively
changed
marketing
practices
accommodate
needs
north
carolina
market
repack
apples
shipped
north
carolina
containers
bearing
usda
grade
store
estimated
portion
harvest
destined
market
special
containers
last
resort
discontinue
use
preprinted
containers
entirely
none
costly
less
efficient
options
attractive
industry
moreover
event
number
followed
north
carolina
lead
resultant
inability
display
washington
grades
force
washington
growers
abandon
state
expensive
inspection
grading
system
customers
come
know
rely
years
existence
problems
confronting
industry
washington
state
apple
advertising
commission
petitioned
north
carolina
board
agriculture
amend
regulation
permit
display
state
grades
administrative
hearing
held
question
relief
granted
indeed
north
carolina
hardened
position
shortly
thereafter
enacting
regulation
law
apples
sold
offered
sale
shipped
state
closed
containers
shall
bear
container
bag
receptacle
grade
applicable
grade
standard
marking
unclassified
graded
grade
determined
stat
unsuccessful
attempts
secure
administrative
relief
commission
instituted
action
challenging
constitutionality
statute
district
eastern
district
north
carolina
complaint
invoked
district
jurisdiction
sought
declaration
statute
violated
inter
alia
commerce
clause
constitution
art
cl
insofar
prohibited
display
washington
state
grades
prayed
permanent
injunction
enforcement
manner
federal
district
convened
pursuant
consider
commission
constitutional
attack
statute
hearing
district
granted
requested
relief
supp
outset
held
commission
standing
challenge
statute
right
behalf
washington
state
growers
dealers
requirement
satisfied
proceeding
merits
district
found
north
carolina
statute
neutral
face
actually
discriminated
washington
state
growers
dealers
favor
local
counterparts
discrimination
resulted
fact
north
carolina
unlike
washington
never
established
grading
inspection
system
hence
statute
effect
existing
practices
north
carolina
producers
still
free
use
usda
grade
none
washington
growers
dealers
hand
forced
alter
procedures
substantial
cost
abandon
north
carolina
market
district
concluded
discrimination
competitors
justified
asserted
local
interest
elimination
deception
confusion
marketplace
arguably
furthered
statute
indeed
noted
statute
irrationally
drawn
accomplish
alleged
goal
since
permitted
marketing
closed
containers
apples
without
grade
therefore
held
statute
unconstitutionally
discriminated
commerce
insofar
affected
interstate
shipment
washington
apples
enjoined
application
appeal
followed
postponed
consideration
question
jurisdiction
hearing
case
merits
sub
nom
holshouser
washington
state
apple
advertising
north
carolina
officials
vigorously
contest
washington
commission
standing
prosecute
action
either
right
behalf
state
apple
industry
purports
represent
outset
appellants
maintain
commission
lacks
personal
stake
outcome
litigation
essential
invocation
jurisdiction
baker
carr
commission
point
state
agency
engaged
production
sale
washington
apples
shipment
north
carolina
rather
north
carolina
activities
limited
promotion
washington
apples
market
advertising
appellants
contend
challenged
statute
impact
activity
since
prohibits
display
state
apple
grades
closed
containers
apples
indeed
since
statute
imposed
restrictions
advertisement
washington
apples
grades
labeling
ban
affects
parties
actually
engaged
apple
trade
commission
said
free
carry
activities
engaged
prior
regulatory
program
appellants
therefore
argue
commission
suffers
injury
economic
otherwise
statute
operation
result
make
case
controversy
appellants
needed
establish
standing
constitutional
sense
arlington
heights
metropolitan
housing
dev
warth
seldin
moreover
appellants
assert
commission
rely
injuries
statute
allegedly
inflicts
individually
collectively
washington
apple
growers
dealers
order
confer
standing
growers
dealers
appellants
argue
disabilities
prevent
coming
forward
protect
rights
fact
injured
statute
operation
event
appellants
contend
commission
proper
representative
industry
interests
although
recognized
association
may
standing
assert
claims
members
even
suffered
injury
challenged
activity
warth
seldin
supra
national
motor
freight
assn
commission
traditional
voluntary
membership
organization
trade
association
members
thus
since
commission
members
whose
claims
might
raise
since
suffered
distinct
palpable
injury
assert
abstract
concern
washington
apple
industry
basis
standing
type
interest
appellants
argue
substitute
concrete
injury
required
art
iii
simon
eastern
ky
welfare
rights
commission
voluntary
membership
organization
typical
trade
association
standing
bring
action
representative
constituents
clear
prior
decisions
warth
seldin
supra
stated
even
absence
injury
association
may
standing
solely
representative
members
association
must
allege
members
one
suffering
immediate
threatened
injury
result
challenged
action
sort
make
justiciable
case
members
brought
suit
long
established
long
nature
claim
relief
sought
make
individual
participation
injured
party
indispensable
proper
resolution
cause
association
may
appropriate
representative
members
entitled
invoke
jurisdiction
hether
association
standing
invoke
remedial
powers
behalf
members
depends
substantial
measure
nature
relief
sought
proper
case
association
seeks
declaration
injunction
form
prospective
relief
reasonably
supposed
remedy
granted
inure
benefit
members
association
actually
injured
indeed
cases
expressly
recognized
standing
associations
represent
members
relief
sought
kind
prerequisites
associational
standing
described
warth
clearly
present
commission
complaint
alleged
district
found
fact
north
carolina
statute
caused
washington
apple
growers
dealers
obliterate
washington
state
grades
large
volume
closed
containers
destined
north
carolina
market
cost
ranging
cents
per
carton
abandon
use
preprinted
containers
thus
diminishing
efficiency
marketing
operations
lose
accounts
north
carolina
injuries
direct
sufficient
establish
requisite
case
controversy
washington
apple
producers
appellants
moreover
commission
attempt
remedy
injuries
secure
industry
right
publicize
grading
system
central
commission
purpose
protecting
enhancing
market
washington
apples
finally
neither
interstate
commerce
claim
request
declaratory
injunctive
relief
requires
individualized
proof
thus
properly
resolved
group
context
question
presented
therefore
whether
record
commission
status
state
agency
rather
traditional
voluntary
membership
organization
precludes
asserting
claims
washington
apple
growers
dealers
form
constituency
think
commission
admittedly
state
agency
practical
purposes
performs
functions
traditional
trade
association
representing
washington
apple
industry
previously
noted
purpose
protection
promotion
washington
apple
industry
pursuit
end
engaged
advertising
market
research
analysis
public
education
campaigns
scientific
research
thus
serves
specialized
segment
state
economic
community
primary
beneficiary
activities
including
prosecution
kind
litigation
moreover
apple
growers
dealers
members
commission
traditional
trade
association
sense
possess
indicia
membership
organization
alone
elect
members
commission
alone
may
serve
commission
alone
finance
activities
including
costs
lawsuit
assessments
levied
upon
real
sense
therefore
commission
represents
state
growers
dealers
provides
means
express
collective
views
protect
collective
interests
find
significant
determining
whether
commission
may
properly
represent
constituency
membership
compelled
form
mandatory
assessments
membership
union
equivalent
often
required
likewise
membership
bar
association
may
also
agency
state
often
prerequisite
practice
law
yet
neither
instance
reasonable
suggest
organization
lacked
standing
assert
claims
constituents
finally
note
interests
commission
may
adversely
affected
outcome
litigation
annual
assessments
paid
commission
tied
volume
apples
grown
packaged
washington
apples
event
north
carolina
statute
results
contraction
market
washington
apples
prevents
market
expansion
might
otherwise
occur
reduce
amount
assessments
due
commission
used
support
activities
financial
nexus
interests
commission
constituents
coalesces
factors
noted
assure
concrete
adverseness
sharpens
presentation
issues
upon
largely
depends
illumination
difficult
constitutional
questions
baker
carr
see
also
naacp
alabama
ex
rel
patterson
circumstances
presented
exalt
form
substance
differentiate
washington
commission
traditional
trade
association
representing
individual
growers
dealers
collectively
form
constituency
therefore
agree
district
commission
standing
bring
action
representational
capacity
turn
next
appellants
claim
commission
failed
satisfy
requirement
appellants
maintain
commission
demonstrated
right
free
restrictions
imposed
challenged
statute
worth
requisite
indeed
argue
commission
made
real
effort
instead
attempted
rely
actual
threatened
injury
individual
washington
apple
growers
dealers
upon
statute
direct
impact
claim
growers
dealers
parties
litigation
alternatively
appellants
argue
even
commission
properly
rely
claims
individual
growers
dealers
establish
required
jurisdictional
amount
without
aggregating
claims
aggregation
argue
impermissible
decisions
snyder
harris
zahn
international
paper
determination
commission
standing
assert
rights
individual
growers
dealers
representational
capacity
disposes
appellants
first
contention
obviously
commission
standing
litigate
claims
constituents
may
also
rely
meet
requisite
amount
controversy
hence
proceed
question
whether
claims
sufficient
confer
jurisdiction
district
resolving
issue
found
unnecessary
reach
aggregation
question
posed
appellants
appear
us
legal
certainty
claims
least
individual
growers
dealers
amount
required
paul
mercury
indemnity
red
cab
actions
seeking
declaratory
injunctive
relief
well
established
amount
controversy
measured
value
object
litigation
mcnutt
general
motors
acceptance
glenwood
light
water
mutual
light
heat
power
hunt
new
york
cotton
exchange
moore
federal
practice
ed
wright
miller
cooper
federal
practice
procedure
object
right
individual
washington
apple
growers
dealers
conduct
business
affairs
north
carolina
market
free
interference
challenged
statute
value
right
measured
losses
follow
statute
enforcement
mcnutt
supra
buck
gallagher
kroger
grocery
baking
lutz
packard
banton
record
demonstrates
growers
dealers
suffered
continue
suffer
losses
various
types
example
evidence
supporting
district
finding
individual
growers
shippers
lost
accounts
north
carolina
direct
result
statute
obviously
lost
sales
lead
diminished
profits
also
evidence
support
finding
individual
growers
dealers
incurred
substantial
costs
complying
statute
previously
noted
statute
caused
growers
dealers
manually
obliterate
washington
grades
closed
containers
shipped
north
carolina
cost
cents
per
carton
dealers
decided
alter
marketing
practices
without
cost
repacking
apples
abandoning
use
preprinted
containers
entirely
among
things
costs
compliance
properly
considered
computing
amount
controversy
buck
gallagher
supra
packard
banton
supra
allway
taxi
new
york
supp
sdny
aff
addition
statute
deprived
growers
dealers
rights
utilize
effectively
washington
state
grades
record
demonstrates
long
standing
gained
wide
acceptance
trade
competitive
advantages
thus
lost
regained
without
incurring
additional
costs
form
advertising
etc
cf
spock
david
rev
grounds
moreover
since
many
apples
eventually
shipped
north
carolina
already
gone
expensive
inspection
grading
procedure
challenged
statute
additional
effect
causing
growers
dealers
incur
inspection
costs
unnecessarily
substantial
volume
sales
north
carolina
record
demonstrates
alone
sales
excess
million
continuing
nature
statute
interference
business
affairs
commission
constituents
preclude
saying
legal
certainty
record
losses
expenses
time
done
already
amount
requisite
least
individual
growers
dealers
sufficient
sustain
district
jurisdiction
requirements
therefore
met
turn
finally
appellants
claim
district
erred
holding
north
carolina
statute
violated
commerce
clause
insofar
prohibited
display
washington
state
grades
closed
containers
apples
shipped
state
appellants
really
contest
district
determination
challenged
statute
burdened
washington
apple
industry
increasing
costs
business
north
carolina
market
causing
lose
accounts
rather
maintain
burdens
interstate
sale
washington
apples
far
outweighed
local
benefits
flowing
contend
valid
exercise
north
carolina
inherent
police
powers
designed
protect
citizenry
fraud
deception
marketing
apples
prior
statute
enactment
appellants
point
apples
different
shipped
north
carolina
sale
seven
including
state
washington
grading
systems
differing
standards
used
similar
descriptive
labels
fancy
extra
fancy
multiplicity
inconsistent
state
grades
district
found
posed
dangers
deception
confusion
north
carolina
market
nation
whole
north
carolina
statute
appellants
claim
enacted
eliminate
source
deception
confusion
replacing
numerous
state
grades
single
uniform
standard
moreover
contended
north
carolina
sought
accomplish
goal
uniformity
evenhanded
manner
evidenced
fact
statute
applies
apples
sold
closed
containers
state
without
regard
point
origin
nonetheless
appellants
argue
district
gave
scant
attention
obvious
benefits
flowing
challenged
legislation
long
line
decisions
holding
possess
broad
powers
protect
local
purchasers
fraud
deception
marketing
foodstuffs
florida
lime
avocado
growers
paul
pacific
box
basket
white
corn
products
refining
eddy
appellants
properly
point
every
exercise
state
authority
imposing
burden
free
flow
commerce
invalid
great
atlantic
pacific
tea
cottrell
freeman
hewit
although
commerce
clause
acts
limitation
upon
state
power
even
without
congressional
implementation
great
atlantic
pacific
tea
supra
freeman
hewit
supra
cooley
board
wardens
opinions
long
recognized
absence
conflicting
legislation
congress
residuum
power
state
make
laws
governing
matters
local
concern
nevertheless
measure
affect
interstate
commerce
even
extent
regulate
southern
pacific
arizona
ex
rel
sullivan
district
correctly
found
challenged
statute
practical
effect
burdening
interstate
sales
washington
apples
also
discriminating
discrimination
takes
various
forms
first
obvious
statute
consequence
raising
costs
business
north
carolina
market
washington
apple
growers
dealers
leaving
north
carolina
counterparts
unaffected
previously
noted
disparate
effect
results
fact
north
carolina
apple
producers
unlike
washington
competitors
forced
alter
marketing
practices
order
comply
statute
still
free
market
wares
usda
grade
none
done
prior
statute
enactment
obviously
increased
costs
imposed
statute
tend
shield
local
apple
industry
competition
washington
apple
growers
dealers
already
competitive
disadvantage
great
distance
north
carolina
market
second
statute
effect
stripping
away
washington
apple
industry
competitive
economic
advantages
earned
expensive
inspection
grading
system
record
demonstrates
washington
system
gained
nationwide
acceptance
apple
trade
indeed
contains
numerous
affidavits
apple
brokers
dealers
located
inside
outside
north
carolina
state
preference
customers
apples
graded
washington
opposed
usda
system
former
greater
consistency
emphasis
color
supporting
mandatory
inspections
statute
similar
impact
north
carolina
apple
industry
thus
operated
benefit
third
prohibiting
washington
growers
dealers
marketing
apples
state
grades
statute
leveling
effect
insidiously
operates
advantage
local
apple
producers
noted
earlier
washington
state
grades
equal
superior
usda
grades
corresponding
categories
hence
free
market
forces
work
washington
sellers
normally
enjoy
distinct
market
advantage
local
producers
categories
washington
grade
superior
however
statute
operation
washington
apples
otherwise
qualify
sold
superior
washington
grades
marketed
inferior
usda
counterparts
downgrading
offers
north
carolina
apple
industry
sort
protection
competing
products
commerce
clause
designed
prohibit
worst
effect
embargo
washington
apples
superior
grades
washington
dealers
withhold
north
carolina
market
best
deprive
washington
sellers
market
premium
apples
otherwise
command
despite
statute
facial
neutrality
commission
suggests
discriminatory
impact
interstate
commerce
unintended
byproduct
indications
record
effect
glaring
response
north
carolina
agriculture
commissioner
commission
request
exemption
following
statute
passage
indicated
support
exemption
want
sentiment
apple
producers
since
mainly
responsible
legislation
passed
app
emphasis
added
moreover
find
somewhat
suspect
north
carolina
singled
closed
containers
apples
means
apples
transported
commerce
effectuate
statute
ostensible
consumer
protection
purpose
apples
generally
sold
retail
shipping
containers
however
need
ascribe
economic
protection
motive
north
carolina
legislature
resolve
case
conclude
challenged
statute
stand
insofar
prohibits
display
washington
state
grades
even
enacted
declared
purpose
protecting
consumers
deception
fraud
marketplace
discrimination
commerce
type
found
demonstrated
burden
falls
state
justify
terms
local
benefits
flowing
statute
unavailability
nondiscriminatory
alternatives
adequate
preserve
local
interests
stake
dean
milk
madison
see
also
great
atlantic
pacific
tea
pike
bruce
church
polar
ice
cream
creamery
andrews
baldwin
seelig
north
carolina
failed
sustain
burden
scores
several
unquestionably
possess
substantial
interest
protecting
citizens
confusion
deception
marketing
foodstuffs
challenged
statute
remarkably
little
laudable
goal
least
respect
washington
apples
grades
statute
already
noted
permits
marketing
closed
containers
apples
grades
result
hardly
thought
eliminate
problems
deception
confusion
created
multiplicity
differing
state
grades
indeed
magnifies
depriving
purchasers
information
concerning
quality
contents
closed
apple
containers
moreover
although
statute
ostensibly
consumer
protection
measure
directs
primary
efforts
consuming
public
large
apple
wholesalers
brokers
principal
purchasers
closed
containers
apples
individuals
presumably
knowledgeable
individuals
area
since
statute
nothing
purify
flow
information
retail
level
little
protect
consumers
problems
designed
eliminate
finally
note
potential
confusion
deception
created
washington
grades
type
led
statute
enactment
since
washington
grades
cases
equal
superior
usda
counterparts
deceive
confuse
consumer
benefit
hardly
harmful
result
addition
appears
nondiscriminatory
alternatives
outright
ban
washington
state
grades
readily
available
example
north
carolina
effectuate
goal
permitting
growers
utilize
state
grades
also
marked
shipments
applicable
usda
label
case
usda
grade
serve
benchmark
consumer
evaluate
quality
various
state
grades
alternative
reason
inadequate
eradicate
problems
caused
state
grades
inferior
adopted
usda
north
carolina
might
consider
banning
state
grades
unlike
washington
demonstrated
equal
superior
corresponding
usda
categories
concededly
even
latter
instance
potential
confusion
might
persist
however
type
confusion
national
interest
free
flow
goods
demands
tolerated
judgment
district
affirmed
footnotes
district
courts
shall
original
jurisdiction
civil
actions
wherein
matter
controversy
exceeds
sum
value
exclusive
interest
costs
north
carolina
regulation
amended
provides
pertinent
part
apple
containers
must
show
applicable
grade
principal
display
panel
marked
unclassified
graded
grade
determined
state
grades
shall
shown
rules
regulations
definitions
standards
north
carolina
department
agriculture
washington
law
commission
corporation
specifically
granted
power
sue
sued
rev
code
regard
adopted
ruling
single
district
judge
previously
denied
appellants
motion
dismiss
complaint
brought
grounds
app
judge
found
unnecessary
determine
whether
jurisdiction
also
proper
view
determination
jurisdiction
established
app
alternative
ground
holding
district
found
statute
constituted
undue
burden
commerce
even
neutral
nondiscriminatory
impact
pike
bruce
church
commission
spent
excess
advertising
washington
apples
north
carolina
market
addition
apples
worth
approximately
percent
amount
transshipped
north
carolina
direct
shipment
apple
brokers
wholesalers
located
indeed
district
specifically
indicated
findings
fact
showing
washington
state
grades
caused
confusion
north
carolina
market
conclusion
regard
necessarily
rejects
north
carolina
suggestion
burdens
commerce
imposed
statute
justified
ground
standardization
required
statute
serves
national
interest
achieving
uniformity
grading
labeling
foodstuffs