mcmillan
pennsylvania
argued
march
decided
june
pennsylvania
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
act
provides
anyone
convicted
certain
enumerated
felonies
subject
mandatory
minimum
sentence
five
years
imprisonment
sentencing
judge
upon
considering
evidence
introduced
trial
additional
evidence
offered
either
defendant
commonwealth
sentencing
hearing
finds
preponderance
evidence
defendant
visibly
possessed
firearm
commission
offense
act
also
provides
visible
possession
shall
element
crime
operates
divest
judge
discretion
impose
sentence
less
five
years
underlying
felony
authorize
sentence
excess
otherwise
allowed
offense
petitioners
convicted
one
act
enumerated
felonies
case
commonwealth
gave
notice
sentencing
seek
proceed
act
however
sentencing
judges
found
act
unconstitutional
imposed
lesser
sentence
required
act
pennsylvania
consolidated
commonwealth
appeals
vacated
petitioners
sentences
remanded
sentencing
pursuant
act
held
act
consistent
due
process
rejecting
petitioners
principal
argument
visible
possession
firearm
element
crimes
sentenced
thus
must
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
winship
mullaney
wilbur
held
state
may
properly
treat
visible
possession
firearm
sentencing
consideration
rather
element
particular
offense
must
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
case
controlled
patterson
new
york
rejected
claim
whenever
state
links
severity
punishment
presence
absence
identified
fact
state
must
prove
fact
beyond
reasonable
doubt
constitutional
limits
beyond
may
go
regard
applicability
standard
usually
dependent
state
defines
offense
charged
given
case
pennsylvania
legislature
made
visible
possession
firearm
sentencing
factor
comes
play
defendant
found
guilty
one
enumerated
crimes
beyond
reasonable
doubt
constitutional
limits
state
power
exceeded
act
raises
minimum
sentence
may
imposed
neither
alters
maximum
sentence
creates
separate
offense
calling
separate
penalty
specht
patterson
distinguished
pp
merit
petitioners
contention
even
though
may
treat
visible
possession
firearm
sentencing
consideration
rather
element
particular
offense
due
process
nonetheless
requires
visible
possession
proved
least
clear
convincing
evidence
preponderance
standard
satisfies
due
process
sentencing
courts
traditionally
heard
evidence
found
facts
without
prescribed
burden
proof
nothing
pennsylvania
scheme
warrants
constitutionalizing
burdens
proof
sentencing
pp
merit
petitioners
claim
act
denies
sixth
amendment
right
trial
jury
sixth
amendment
right
jury
sentencing
even
sentence
turns
specific
findings
fact
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
white
powell
joined
marshall
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
blackmun
joined
post
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
leonard
sosnov
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
john
packel
david
rudovsky
gerald
stein
steven
cooperstein
argued
cause
respondent
brief
gaele
mclaughlin
barthold
harriet
brumberg
eric
henson
william
chadwick
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
granted
certiorari
consider
constitutionality
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
jury
trial
guarantee
sixth
amendment
pennsylvania
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
cons
stat
act
act
adopted
provides
anyone
convicted
certain
enumerated
felonies
subject
mandatory
minimum
sentence
five
years
imprisonment
sentencing
judge
finds
preponderance
evidence
person
visibly
possessed
firearm
commission
offense
sentencing
hearing
judge
directed
consider
evidence
introduced
trial
additional
evidence
offered
either
defendant
commonwealth
act
operates
divest
judge
discretion
impose
sentence
less
five
years
underlying
felony
authorize
sentence
excess
otherwise
allowed
offense
petitioner
convicted
among
things
one
enumerated
felonies
petitioner
mcmillan
shot
victim
right
buttock
argument
debt
convicted
jury
aggravated
assault
petitioner
peterson
shot
killed
husband
following
bench
trial
convicted
voluntary
manslaughter
petitioner
dennison
shot
seriously
wounded
acquaintance
convicted
aggravated
assault
bench
trial
petitioner
smalls
robbed
seafood
store
gunpoint
following
bench
trial
convicted
robbery
case
commonwealth
gave
notice
sentencing
seek
proceed
act
hearing
held
however
sentencing
judges
petitioners
appeared
found
act
unconstitutional
imposed
lesser
sentence
required
act
commonwealth
appealed
four
cases
pennsylvania
consolidated
appeals
unanimously
concluded
act
consistent
due
process
commonwealth
wright
petitioners
principal
argument
visible
possession
firearm
element
crimes
sentenced
thus
must
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
winship
mullaney
wilbur
observing
legislature
expressly
provided
visible
possession
shall
element
crime
standard
always
dependent
state
defines
offense
question
quoting
patterson
new
york
rejected
claim
act
effectively
creates
new
set
upgraded
felonies
visible
possession
element
section
comes
play
defendant
convicted
enumerated
felony
neither
provides
increase
maximum
sentence
felony
authorizes
separate
sentence
merely
requires
minimum
sentence
five
years
may
less
minimum
sentence
might
otherwise
imposed
consistent
winship
mullaney
patterson
act
creates
presumption
essential
fact
places
burden
defendant
way
relieve
prosecution
burden
proving
guilt
petitioners
also
contended
even
visible
possession
element
offense
due
process
requires
proof
preponderance
evidence
pennsylvania
rejected
claim
well
holding
preponderance
standard
satisfies
due
process
approach
set
addington
texas
commonwealth
interest
deterring
illegal
use
firearms
sure
punishment
commit
crimes
guns
compelling
convicted
defendant
countervailing
liberty
interest
substantially
diminished
guilty
verdict
moreover
risk
error
context
proceeding
comparatively
slight
visible
possession
simple
straightforward
issue
susceptible
objective
proof
balance
concluded
reasonable
defendant
commonwealth
share
equally
risk
error
vacated
petitioners
sentences
remanded
sentencing
pursuant
act
one
justice
concurred
filed
separate
opinion
granted
certiorari
affirm
ii
petitioners
argue
due
process
clause
interpreted
winship
mullaney
state
wants
punish
visible
possession
firearm
must
undertake
burden
proving
fact
beyond
reasonable
doubt
disagree
winship
held
due
process
clause
protects
accused
conviction
except
upon
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
necessary
constitute
crime
charged
mullaney
wilbur
held
due
process
clause
requires
prosecution
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
absence
heat
passion
sudden
provocation
issue
properly
presented
homicide
case
patterson
rejected
claim
whenever
state
links
severity
punishment
presence
absence
identified
fact
state
must
prove
fact
beyond
reasonable
doubt
see
also
state
need
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
existence
nonexistence
willing
recognize
exculpatory
mitigating
circumstance
affecting
degree
culpability
severity
punishment
particular
upheld
due
process
challenge
new
york
law
placing
defendants
charged
murder
burden
proving
affirmative
defense
extreme
emotional
disturbance
patterson
stressed
determining
facts
must
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
state
legislature
definition
elements
offense
usually
dispositive
due
process
clause
requires
prosecution
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
elements
included
definition
offense
defendant
charged
emphasis
added
obviously
constitutional
limits
beyond
may
go
regard
applicability
standard
always
dependent
state
defines
offense
charged
given
case
patterson
rests
premise
bears
repeating
goes
without
saying
preventing
dealing
crime
much
business
federal
government
irvine
california
plurality
opinion
lightly
construe
constitution
intrude
upon
administration
justice
individual
among
things
normally
within
power
state
regulate
procedures
laws
carried
including
burden
producing
evidence
burden
persuasion
decision
regard
subject
proscription
due
process
clause
unless
offends
principle
justice
rooted
traditions
conscience
people
ranked
fundamental
speiser
randall
citations
omitted
patterson
recognized
course
constitutional
limits
state
power
regard
certain
limited
circumstances
winship
requirement
applies
facts
formally
identified
elements
offense
charged
petitioners
argue
pennsylvania
gone
beyond
limits
formal
provision
visible
possession
element
crime
therefore
effect
think
never
attempted
define
precisely
constitutional
limits
noted
patterson
extent
due
process
forbids
reallocation
reduction
burdens
proof
criminal
cases
today
persuaded
several
factors
pennsylvania
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
exceed
limits
note
first
act
plainly
transgress
limits
expressly
set
patterson
responding
concern
rule
permit
unbridled
power
redefine
crimes
detriment
criminal
defendants
patterson
advanced
unremarkable
proposition
due
process
clause
precludes
discarding
presumption
innocence
within
province
legislature
declare
individual
guilty
presumptively
guilty
crime
mcfarland
american
sugar
rfg
legislature
validly
command
finding
indictment
mere
proof
identity
accused
create
presumption
existence
facts
essential
guilt
tot
patterson
mullaney
observed
respect
main
criminal
statute
invalidated
case
state
proved
elements
maine
required
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
defendant
faced
differential
sentencing
ranging
nominal
fine
mandatory
life
sentence
present
case
situation
quite
different
offenses
enumerated
act
murder
robbery
defined
cons
stat
kidnaping
rape
involuntary
deviate
sexual
intercourse
felonies
subjecting
defendant
maximum
years
imprisonment
voluntary
manslaughter
aggravated
assault
defined
felonies
second
degree
carrying
maximum
sentence
years
section
neither
alters
maximum
penalty
crime
committed
creates
separate
offense
calling
separate
penalty
operates
solely
limit
sentencing
discretion
selecting
penalty
within
range
already
available
without
special
finding
visible
possession
firearm
section
ups
ante
defendant
raising
five
years
minimum
sentence
may
imposed
within
statutory
plan
statute
gives
impression
tailored
permit
visible
possession
finding
tail
wags
dog
substantive
offense
petitioners
claim
visible
possession
pennsylvania
statute
really
element
offenses
punished
pennsylvania
effect
defined
new
set
upgraded
felonies
least
superficial
appeal
finding
visible
possession
exposed
greater
additional
punishment
cf
providing
separate
greater
punishment
bank
robberies
accomplished
use
dangerous
weapon
device
petitioners
contend
decision
specht
patterson
requires
invalidation
pennsylvania
statute
challenged
think
petitioners
simply
read
much
one
previous
decisions
colorado
scheme
issue
specht
conviction
sexual
offense
otherwise
carrying
maximum
penalty
years
exposed
defendant
indefinite
term
including
life
imprisonment
sentencing
judge
made
finding
defendant
posed
threat
bodily
harm
members
public
habitual
offender
mentally
ill
finding
made
without
notice
hearing
normal
sense
based
solely
presentence
psychiatric
report
held
colorado
scheme
failed
satisfy
requirements
due
process
defendant
right
present
counsel
heard
confronted
witnesses
offer
evidence
petitioners
suggest
winship
already
decided
time
specht
also
required
burden
proof
findings
beyond
reasonable
doubt
even
accept
petitioners
hypothesis
think
avails
specht
observed
following
trial
colorado
defendant
confronted
radically
different
situation
usual
sentencing
proceeding
simply
true
pennsylvania
statute
finding
visible
possession
firearm
course
ups
ante
defendant
challenged
way
previously
mentioned
raising
minimum
sentence
may
imposed
trial
finally
note
specter
raised
petitioners
restructuring
existing
crimes
order
evade
commands
winship
appear
case
noted
enumerated
felonies
retain
elements
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
passed
pennsylvania
legislature
change
definition
existing
offense
simply
took
one
factor
always
considered
sentencing
courts
bear
punishment
instrumentality
used
committing
violent
felony
dictated
precise
weight
given
factor
instrumentality
firearm
pennsylvania
decision
transformed
sentencing
factor
element
hypothetical
offense
petitioners
seek
support
due
process
claim
observing
many
legislatures
made
possession
weapon
element
various
aggravated
offenses
fact
formulated
different
statutory
schemes
punish
armed
felons
merely
reflection
federal
system
demands
olerance
spectrum
state
procedures
dealing
common
problem
law
enforcement
spencer
texas
pennsylvania
particular
approach
adopted
render
pennsylvania
choice
unconstitutional
see
patterson
cf
spaziano
florida
historical
test
advanced
patterson
dissent
petitioners
apparently
also
rely
materially
advance
cause
surely
true
hundreds
years
offenses
considered
serious
punishment
made
severe
offense
committed
weapon
armed
brief
petitioners
petitioners
contend
particular
factor
made
relevant
visible
possession
firearm
historically
treated
legal
tradition
requiring
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
patterson
powell
dissenting
see
also
powell
dissenting
approving
new
scheme
state
put
burden
armed
robbery
defendant
prove
gun
unloaded
inoperative
order
receive
lower
sentence
noted
number
differences
case
winship
mullaney
specht
find
differences
controlling
inability
lay
bright
line
test
may
leave
constitutionality
statutes
like
mullaney
specht
pennsylvania
statute
depend
differences
degree
law
full
situations
differences
degree
produce
different
results
doubt
pennsylvania
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
falls
permissible
side
constitutional
line
iii
concluded
may
treat
visible
possession
firearm
sentencing
consideration
rather
element
particular
offense
turn
petitioners
subsidiary
claim
due
process
nonetheless
requires
visible
possession
proved
least
clear
convincing
evidence
like
little
difficulty
concluding
case
preponderance
standard
satisfies
due
process
indeed
extraordinary
due
process
clause
understood
patterson
plainly
sanctioned
pennsylvania
scheme
clause
explained
line
less
clearly
relevant
cases
imposed
stringent
requirements
one
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
furthermore
petitioners
claim
sentencing
may
never
rely
particular
fact
passing
sentence
without
finding
fact
clear
convincing
evidence
sentencing
courts
traditionally
heard
evidence
found
facts
without
prescribed
burden
proof
see
williams
new
york
pennsylvania
deemed
particular
fact
relevant
prescribed
particular
burden
proof
see
nothing
pennsylvania
scheme
warrant
constitutionalizing
burdens
proof
sentencing
petitioners
apparently
concede
pennsylvania
scheme
pass
constitutional
muster
remove
sentencing
discretion
legislature
simply
directed
consider
visible
possession
passing
sentence
brief
petitioners
difficulty
fathoming
due
process
calculus
change
simply
legislature
seen
fit
provide
sentencing
courts
additional
guidance
merit
claim
heightened
burden
proof
required
visible
possession
fact
concerning
crime
committed
rather
background
character
defendant
ibid
sentencing
courts
necessarily
consider
circumstances
offense
selecting
appropriate
punishment
consistently
approved
sentencing
schemes
mandate
consideration
facts
related
crime
proffitt
florida
without
suggesting
facts
must
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
courts
appeals
uniformly
rejected
due
process
challenges
preponderance
standard
federal
dangerous
special
offender
statute
provides
enhanced
sentence
concludes
defendant
dangerous
special
offender
see
davis
collecting
cases
cert
denied
iv
light
foregoing
petitioners
final
claim
act
denies
sixth
amendment
right
trial
jury
merits
little
discussion
petitioners
argue
jury
must
determine
ultimate
facts
concerning
offense
committed
concluded
pennsylvania
may
properly
treat
visible
possession
sentencing
consideration
element
offense
need
note
sixth
amendment
right
jury
sentencing
even
sentence
turns
specific
findings
fact
see
spaziano
florida
foregoing
reasons
judgment
pennsylvania
affirmed
ordered
footnotes
mcmillan
sentenced
term
years
aggravated
assault
also
convicted
possession
instruments
crime
cons
stat
received
concurrent
term
years
peterson
received
sentence
years
manslaughter
charge
well
concurrent
term
months
possession
instruments
crime
dennison
received
concurrent
sentences
months
aggravated
assault
possession
instruments
crime
smalls
sentenced
concurrent
terms
robbery
criminal
conspiracy
also
convicted
violating
uniform
firearms
act
et
reckless
endangerment
sentenced
concurrent
terms
years
years
respectively
received
suspended
sentence
possession
instruments
crime
elements
enumerated
offenses
established
essentially
present
form
see
laws
compiled
amended
codified
pennsylvania
crimes
code
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
passed
prescribing
mandatory
minimum
sentence
act
incidentally
serves
restrict
sentencing
discretion
setting
maximum
sentence
pennsylvania
law
provides
minimum
sentence
confinement
shall
exceed
maximum
sentence
imposed
cons
stat
thus
shortest
maximum
term
permissible
act
years
reject
view
anything
due
process
clause
bars
making
changes
criminal
law
effect
making
easier
prosecution
obtain
convictions
vantage
point
constitution
change
law
favorable
defendants
necessarily
good
innovation
favorable
prosecution
necessarily
bad
jeffries
stephan
defenses
presumptions
burden
proof
criminal
law
yale
commonwealth
argues
statutes
petitioners
rely
typically
differ
issue
particular
statutes
directed
deadly
weapons
rather
firearms
treat
armed
crime
higher
grade
offense
unarmed
crime
brief
respondent
least
two
new
jersey
see
stat
ann
west
state
gantt
super
aff
super
app
div
kansas
see
stat
ann
state
mullins
statutory
schemes
similar
pennsylvania
addington
texas
santosky
kramer
respectively
applied
clear
convincing
evidence
standard
state
sought
involuntary
commitment
mental
institution
involuntary
termination
parental
rights
contrary
quite
unlike
situation
cases
criminal
sentencing
takes
place
defendant
adjudged
guilty
beyond
reasonable
doubt
standard
applied
obtain
valid
conviction
criminal
defendant
constitutionally
deprived
liberty
extent
state
may
confine
meachum
fano
noted
text
sentencing
courts
always
operated
without
constitutionally
imposed
burdens
proof
embracing
petitioners
suggestion
apply
standard
significantly
alter
criminal
sentencing
see
way
distinguish
visible
possession
finding
issue
host
express
implied
findings
sentencing
judges
typically
make
way
passing
sentence
justice
marshall
justice
brennan
justice
blackmun
join
dissenting
agree
much
justice
stevens
dissent
post
whether
particular
fact
element
criminal
offense
winship
must
proved
prosecution
beyond
reasonable
doubt
question
must
decided
abdicated
winship
limited
facts
constitute
crime
defined
state
law
state
undermine
many
interests
decision
sought
protect
without
effecting
substantive
change
law
mullaney
wilbur
deference
majority
gives
pennsylvania
legislature
statement
visible
possession
firearm
considered
element
crime
defined
cons
stat
thus
wholly
inappropriate
however
rely
case
formalistic
distinction
aggravating
mitigating
facts
continued
functioning
democratic
process
post
stevens
dissenting
might
provide
us
assurance
circumvent
guarantee
winship
criminalizing
seemingly
innocuous
conduct
placing
burden
defendant
establish
affirmative
defense
nonetheless
must
remain
ready
enforce
guarantee
state
placing
upon
defendant
burden
proving
certain
mitigating
facts
effectively
lighten
constitutional
burden
prosecution
respect
elements
crime
see
patterson
new
york
allowing
state
require
defendant
prove
extreme
emotional
disturbance
preponderance
evidence
noting
affirmative
defense
serve
negative
facts
crime
state
prove
order
convict
murder
put
next
term
discussion
mitigating
facts
analyzed
winship
issue
aired
considers
martin
ohio
cert
granted
defendant
challenges
ohio
requirement
accused
bear
burden
proving
claim
preponderance
evidence
enough
agree
justice
stevens
state
provides
specific
component
prohibited
transaction
shall
give
rise
special
stigma
special
punishment
component
must
treated
fact
necessary
constitute
crime
within
meaning
holding
winship
post
pennsylvania
attached
consequences
finding
defendant
visibly
possessed
firearm
commission
aggravated
assault
winship
prosecution
relieved
proving
fact
beyond
reasonable
doubt
dissent
justice
stevens
dissenting
petitioner
dennison
man
committed
aggravated
assault
upon
neighborhood
youth
suspected
stealing
money
house
trial
commonwealth
proved
elements
offense
aggravated
assault
beyond
reasonable
doubt
trial
judge
imposed
sentence
imprisonment
months
concluded
pennsylvania
recently
enacted
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
cons
stat
unconstitutional
trial
judge
refused
impose
minimum
sentence
mandated
act
whenever
commonwealth
proves
preponderance
evidence
defendant
visibly
possessed
firearm
commission
offense
judge
presiding
dennison
trial
well
judges
three
petitioners
trial
superior
judges
hearing
appeals
concluded
visible
possession
firearm
element
offense
visibly
possessed
firearm
inarguably
language
refers
behavior
legislature
intended
prohibit
app
pet
cert
consequence
prohibited
conduct
established
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
pennsylvania
agreed
visible
possession
firearm
conduct
pennsylvania
general
assembly
intended
prohibit
commonwealth
wright
larsen
concurring
concurring
opinion
joined
majority
opinion
recognized
evidence
conduct
mandate
minimum
sentence
imprisonment
twice
severe
maximum
trial
judge
otherwise
imposed
petitioner
dennison
nonetheless
held
visible
possession
firearm
element
offense
pennsylvania
general
assembly
foresight
declare
provisions
section
shall
element
crime
common
ground
due
process
clause
requires
prosecution
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
elements
included
definition
offense
defendant
charged
patterson
new
york
today
holds
state
legislatures
may
define
offense
criminal
defendant
charged
may
also
authoritatively
determine
conduct
described
prohibited
activity
subjects
defendant
criminal
sanctions
element
crime
due
process
clause
requires
proved
prosecution
beyond
reasonable
doubt
view
state
legislature
may
dispense
requirement
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
conduct
targets
severe
criminal
penalties
pennsylvania
statute
challenged
case
describes
conduct
pennsylvania
legislature
obviously
intended
prohibit
mandates
lengthy
incarceration
believe
conduct
described
element
criminal
offense
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
requirement
applies
state
defines
criminal
offense
due
process
clause
requires
prove
component
prohibited
transaction
gives
rise
special
stigma
special
punishment
beyond
reasonable
doubt
much
evident
least
since
winship
case
explicitly
held
due
process
clause
protects
accused
conviction
except
upon
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
necessary
constitute
crime
charged
reasoning
conclusion
reviewed
heritage
rule
justice
frankfurter
characterized
basic
law
rightly
one
boasts
free
society
critical
importance
decision
us
explained
reasons
undergird
rule
standard
plays
vital
role
american
scheme
criminal
procedure
prime
instrument
reducing
risk
convictions
resting
factual
error
standard
provides
concrete
substance
presumption
innocence
bedrock
axiomatic
elementary
principle
whose
enforcement
lies
foundation
administration
criminal
law
coffin
dissenters
new
york
appeals
observed
agree
person
accused
crime
severe
disadvantage
disadvantage
amounting
lack
fundamental
fairness
adjudged
guilty
imprisoned
years
strength
evidence
suffice
civil
case
requirement
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
vital
role
criminal
procedure
cogent
reasons
accused
criminal
prosecution
stake
interest
immense
importance
possibility
may
lose
liberty
upon
conviction
certainty
stigmatized
conviction
accordingly
society
values
good
name
freedom
every
individual
condemn
man
commission
crime
reasonable
doubt
guilt
true
points
applicability
standard
always
dependent
state
defines
offense
charged
given
case
see
ante
quoting
patterson
new
york
state
freedom
regard
however
always
understood
reflect
uncontroversial
proposition
state
power
subject
course
constitutional
limits
attach
criminal
penalties
wide
variety
objectionable
transactions
prosecution
need
establish
beyond
reasonable
doubt
constituent
elements
specified
criminal
transaction
nothing
patterson
predecessors
authorizes
state
decide
ingredients
prohibited
transaction
elements
must
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
trial
indeed
contrary
supposition
majority
patterson
new
york
entirely
keeping
limit
state
definitional
power
implied
winship
patterson
charged
murder
crime
new
york
included
two
elements
intent
cause
death
another
person
caus
ing
death
person
third
person
quoting
penal
law
mckinney
malice
aforethought
element
crime
causing
death
another
person
intent
act
state
may
constitutionally
criminalize
punish
accord
new
york
fact
proscribed
punished
conduct
upheld
state
refusal
prove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
every
fact
existence
nonexistence
willing
recognize
exculpatory
mitigating
circumstance
affecting
degree
culpability
severity
punishment
emphasis
added
case
affirmative
defense
extreme
emotional
disturbance
explained
due
process
clause
invalidate
every
instance
burdening
defendant
proving
exculpatory
fact
emphasis
added
recognize
mitigating
circumstance
require
state
prove
nonexistence
case
fact
put
issue
emphasis
added
patterson
thus
clarified
due
process
clause
requires
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
conduct
exposes
criminal
defendant
greater
stigma
punishment
likewise
constrain
state
reductions
criminal
penalties
even
reductions
conditioned
prosecutor
failure
prove
fact
preponderance
evidence
proof
supplied
criminal
defendant
distinction
aggravating
mitigating
facts
criticized
formalistic
ability
identify
genuine
constitutional
threats
depends
nothing
continued
functioning
democratic
process
appreciate
difference
aggravating
mitigating
circumstances
important
remember
although
may
reach
destination
either
criminalizing
conduct
allowing
affirmative
defense
prohibiting
lesser
conduct
enhancing
penalty
legislation
proceeding
along
two
paths
different
even
might
theoretically
achieve
result
consider
example
statute
making
presence
private
public
place
felony
punishable
five
years
imprisonment
yet
allowing
affirmative
defense
defendant
prove
preponderance
evidence
robbing
bank
dutile
burden
proof
criminal
cases
comment
doctrine
notre
dame
law
democratically
elected
legislature
enact
law
coalition
bankers
bank
customers
soon
see
legislation
repealed
serious
danger
state
soon
define
murder
mere
physical
contact
defendant
victim
leading
victim
death
set
affirmative
defense
leaving
defendant
prove
acted
without
culpable
mens
rea
patterson
new
york
powell
dissenting
legislator
willing
expose
severe
opprobrium
punishment
meted
murderers
accidental
stumble
subway
similar
reasons
safely
assumed
state
define
assaults
single
offense
require
defendant
disprove
elements
aggravation
mullaney
wilbur
inconceivability
hypothesized
legislation
sincerely
offered
illustrate
dangers
permitting
legislative
mitigation
punishment
derogation
requirement
proof
beyond
reasonable
doubt
reason
enough
feel
secure
command
majority
electorate
inconceivable
however
fear
state
might
subject
individuals
convicted
engaging
antisocial
conduct
punishment
aggravating
conduct
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
case
demonstrates
state
may
seek
enhance
deterrent
effect
law
forbidding
use
firearms
course
felonies
mandating
minimum
sentence
imprisonment
upon
proof
preponderance
already
convicted
specified
crimes
winship
patterson
teach
state
may
advance
objectives
criminal
laws
expense
accurate
factfinding
owed
criminally
accused
suffer
risk
nonpersuasion
demean
importance
standard
indeed
demean
constitution
substance
standard
avoided
nothing
legislative
declaration
prohibited
conduct
element
crime
legislative
definition
offense
named
assault
broad
enough
encompass
every
intentional
infliction
harm
one
person
upon
another
surely
legislature
provide
fact
must
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
specify
range
increased
punishments
prosecution
show
preponderance
evidence
defendant
robbed
raped
killed
victim
commission
offense
appropriate
respect
rule
winship
requires
constitutional
limits
power
state
define
elements
criminal
offenses
high
standard
proof
required
immense
importance
individual
interest
avoiding
loss
liberty
stigma
results
criminal
conviction
follows
submit
state
provides
specific
component
prohibited
transaction
shall
give
rise
special
stigma
special
punishment
component
must
treated
fact
necessary
constitute
crime
within
meaning
holding
winship
pennsylvania
mandatory
minimum
sentencing
act
reflects
legislative
determination
defendant
visibly
possessed
firearm
commission
aggravated
assault
blameworthy
defendant
judicial
finding
defendant
used
firearm
aggravated
assault
places
greater
stigma
defendant
name
simple
finding
committed
aggravated
assault
overlooked
finding
respect
petitioner
dennison
automatically
mandates
punishment
twice
severe
maximum
punishment
trial
judge
considered
appropriate
conduct
true
points
enhanced
punishment
within
range
authorized
aggravated
assault
fact
however
minimize
significance
finding
visible
possession
firearm
whether
attention
focused
stigmatizing
punitive
consequences
finding
see
mullaney
wilbur
finding
identifies
conduct
legislature
specifically
intended
prohibit
punish
special
sanction
opinion
constitutional
significance
special
sanction
avoided
cavalier
observation
merely
ups
ante
defendant
see
ante
matter
culpable
petitioner
dennison
may
difference
months
years
incarceration
merits
principled
justification
luck
draw
respectfully
dissent
leland
oregon
frankfurter
dissenting
later
opinion
noted
duty
state
establishing
every
fact
equation
adds
crime
establishing
satisfaction
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
decisive
difference
criminal
culpability
civil
liability
combination
stigma
loss
liberty
involved
conditional
absolute
sentence
imprisonment
sets
sanction
apart
anything
else
law
imposes
packer
mens
rea
rev
requirement
conduct
subjecting
individual
special
stigma
special
punishment
proved
beyond
reasonable
doubt
therefore
casts
doubt
constitutionality
criminal
restitution
ordered
lesser
standard
proof
patterson
also
recognized
constitutional
limits
beyond
may
go
regard
citing
tot
cases
invalidating
statutory
presumptions
basis
cases
patterson
distinguished
maine
statute
struck
mullaney
wilbur
maine
murder
statute
prescribed
life
imprisonment
whoever
unlawfully
kills
human
malice
aforethought
rev
stat
tit
emphasis
added
trial
judge
charged
jury
malice
aforethought
essential
indispensable
element
crime
murder
quoting
app
likewise
government
conceded
federal
enactment
tot
proscribed
receipt
firearms
interstate
commerce
see
tot
patterson
clarified
mullaney
like
tot
stood
proposition
shifting
burden
persuasion
respect
fact
state
deems
important
must
either
proved
presumed
impermissible
due
process
clause
emphasis
added
cf
romano
thus
although
maine
punished
unlawful
intentional
killings
life
imprisonment
congress
tot
punished
possession
firearm
one
convicted
crime
violence
neither
case
legislature
explanation
although
entirely
satisfactory
see
state
lafferty
wernick
concurring
consistent
maine
explanation
direct
appeal
state
law
presumed
malice
see
state
wilbur
state
downplayed
presumption
burden
imposed
upon
defendant
state
first
convinced
jury
beyond
reasonable
doubt
defendant
guilty
voluntary
intentional
homicide
point
issue
longer
guilt
innocence
felonious
homicide
rather
degree
homicide
held
mullaney
safeguards
due
process
rendered
unavailable
simply
determination
may
already
reached
stigmatize
defendant
might
lead
significant
impairment
personal
liberty
accord
specht
patterson
cf
ashford
risinger
presumptions
assumptions
due
process
criminal
cases
theoretical
overview
yale
first
statute
legislature
deemed
three
factors
germane
punishment
presence
individual
presence
narcotics
house
defendant
knowledge
second
statute
two
factors
deemed
germane
whether
individual
punished
presence
individual
presence
narcotics
house
electorate
might
approve
passage
first
statute
passage
second
fact
legislature
might
pass
second
statute
mean
given
political
temperament
state
legislature
fact
passed
legislature
nominally
recognizes
knowledge
germane
first
statute
type
germane
issue
proved
state
arranges
process
lack
knowledge
still
sent
jail
though
second
statute
passed
individuals
punished
crime
never
undergone
political
checks
guaranteed
representative
government
note
constitutionality
affirmative
defenses
patterson
new
york
colum
rev
lthough
state
legislature
might
decided
define
offense
without
mitigating
exculpatory
factor
reason
suppose
done
given
political
climate
state
done
see
ely
democracy
distrust
constitutional
law
appropriately
exists
situations
representative
government
trusted
know
see
also
likewise
irrelevant
petitioners
first
convicted
predicate
felonies
system
criminal
justice
even
thief
entitled
complain
unconstitutionally
convicted
imprisoned
burglar
jackson
virginia
see
supra