pierce
underwood
argued
december
decided
june
one
petitioner
predecessors
secretary
housing
urban
development
decided
implement
operating
subsidy
program
authorized
federal
statute
intended
provide
payments
owners
apartment
buildings
offset
rising
utility
expenses
property
taxes
various
plaintiffs
including
respondent
members
nationwide
class
housing
tenants
successfully
challenged
decision
lawsuits
nine
federal
district
courts
two
decisions
affirmed
courts
appeals
newly
appointed
secretary
settled
plaintiffs
including
respondents
district
administering
settlement
congress
passed
equal
access
justice
act
eaja
authorizes
award
reasonable
attorney
fees
government
unless
finds
position
substantially
justified
eaja
amount
fees
awarded
must
based
upon
prevailing
market
rates
kind
quality
services
furnished
except
fees
shall
awarded
excess
per
hour
unless
determines
increase
cost
living
special
factor
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
justifies
higher
fee
awarded
fees
respondents
eaja
concluding
decision
implement
program
substantially
justified
basing
amount
award
exceeded
million
special
factors
justifying
hourly
rates
excess
cap
appeals
held
district
abused
discretion
concluding
secretary
position
substantially
justified
special
factors
relied
district
justified
exceeding
cap
held
reviewing
district
determination
secretary
position
substantially
justified
appeals
correctly
applied
standard
rather
de
novo
standard
review
neither
clear
statutory
prescription
historical
tradition
requires
choice
standards
however
deferential
review
suggested
eaja
language
requires
fees
award
unless
finds
rather
simply
unless
position
substantially
justified
statute
structure
expressly
provides
standard
review
agency
fee
determinations
matter
sound
judicial
administration
district
courts
better
position
courts
appeals
decide
substantial
justification
question
moreover
question
multifarious
novel
little
susceptible
useful
generalization
time
therefore
likely
profit
experience
standard
permit
develop
pp
statutory
phrase
substantially
justified
means
justified
substance
main
justified
degree
satisfy
reasonable
person
interpretation
phrase
accords
related
uses
term
substantial
equivalent
reasonable
basis
law
fact
formulation
adopted
vast
majority
courts
appeals
respondents
reliance
house
committee
report
pertaining
reenactment
eaja
proposition
substantial
justification
means
mere
reasonableness
misplaced
since
report
authoritative
interpretation
statute
meant
language
drafted
committee
merely
accepted
existing
statutory
phrase
pp
appeals
correctly
ruled
district
abuse
discretion
finding
government
position
substantially
justified
although
objective
indicia
relevant
establishing
substantial
justification
inconclusive
case
government
willingness
settle
litigation
stage
proceedings
merits
decided
reliable
objective
indicia
neither
views
expressed
courts
merits
provide
support
sides
government
arguments
merits
underlying
issue
command
conclusion
position
substantially
justified
pp
district
abused
discretion
fixing
amount
respondents
attorney
fees
since
none
reasons
relied
increase
reimbursement
rate
statutory
maximum
special
factor
within
eaja
meaning
since
special
factor
formulation
suggests
congress
thought
hour
generally
sufficient
regardless
prevailing
market
rate
limited
availability
factor
must
refer
attorneys
qualified
proceedings
specialized
sense
patent
lawyers
patent
proceedings
rather
general
legal
competence
similarly
order
preserve
cap
effectiveness
special
factors
must
broad
general
application
thus
factors
relied
novelty
difficulty
issues
undesirability
case
work
ability
counsel
results
obtained
contingent
nature
fee
qualify
since
applicable
broad
spectrum
litigation
little
routine
reasons
market
rates
pennsylvania
delaware
valley
citizens
council
clean
air
distinguished
pp
scalia
delivered
opinion
part
participating
members
joined
parts
ii
iv
rehnquist
brennan
marshall
blackmun
stevens
joined
part
iii
rehnquist
white
stevens
joined
part
rehnquist
stevens
joined
white
joined
except
last
three
lines
brennan
filed
opinion
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
marshall
blackmun
joined
post
white
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
joined
post
kennedy
took
part
consideration
decision
case
deputy
solicitor
general
merrill
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
solicitor
general
fried
assistant
attorney
general
willard
deputy
solicitor
general
lauber
charles
rothfeld
william
kanter
john
koppel
gershon
ratner
mary
burdick
argued
cause
respondents
brief
richard
rothschild
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
battles
farm
et
al
gerald
goldman
thomas
goldberg
national
organization
social
security
claimants
representatives
robert
rains
nancy
shor
san
francisco
lawyers
committee
urban
affairs
et
al
marilyn
kaplan
small
business
foundation
america
et
al
david
overlock
stewart
vernice
dubose
et
al
dennis
william
clendenen
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
respondents
settled
lawsuit
one
petitioner
predecessors
secretary
housing
urban
development
awarded
attorney
fees
found
position
taken
secretary
substantially
justified
within
meaning
equal
access
justice
act
eaja
also
determined
special
factors
justified
calculating
attorney
fees
rate
excess
cap
imposed
statute
granted
certiorari
resolve
conflict
courts
appeals
important
questions
concerning
interpretation
eaja
compare
dubose
pierce
cert
pending
per
curiam
amended
case
dispute
arose
decision
one
petitioner
predecessors
secretary
implement
operating
subsidy
program
authorized
amended
housing
community
development
act
pub
stat
formerly
codified
supp
iv
program
provided
payments
owners
apartment
buildings
offset
rising
utility
expenses
property
taxes
various
plaintiffs
successfully
challenged
secretary
decision
lawsuits
filed
nine
federal
district
courts
see
underwood
pierce
supp
cd
cal
citing
cases
secretary
appealing
adverse
decisions
respondents
members
nationwide
class
tenants
residing
housing
brought
present
action
challenging
secretary
decision
district
district
columbia
also
decided
issue
secretary
granted
summary
judgment
favor
respondents
entered
permanent
injunction
writ
mandamus
requiring
secretary
disburse
accumulated
fund
see
underwood
hills
supp
stayed
district
judgment
pending
appeal
sub
nom
hills
cooperative
services
appeals
second
circuit
similarly
stayed
pending
appeal
one
eight
district
judgments
secretary
see
dubose
harris
two
judgments
affirmed
courts
appeals
see
ross
community
services
abrams
hills
vacated
sub
nom
pierce
ross
consolidated
cases
granted
secretary
petitions
writs
certiorari
review
decisions
harris
ross
appeals
reached
decision
issue
review
merits
newly
appointed
secretary
settled
plaintiffs
cases
secretary
agreed
pay
settlement
fund
million
distribution
owners
subsidized
housing
tenants
whose
rents
increased
subsidies
paid
present
case
transferred
central
district
california
administration
settlement
settlement
administered
congress
passed
eaja
relevant
provides
except
otherwise
specifically
provided
statute
shall
award
prevailing
party
fees
expenses
incurred
party
civil
action
brought
unless
finds
position
substantially
justified
special
circumstances
make
award
unjust
purposes
subsection
fees
expense
includes
reasonable
attorney
fees
amount
fees
awarded
subsection
shall
based
upon
prevailing
market
rates
kind
quality
services
furnished
except
ii
attorney
fees
shall
awarded
excess
per
hour
unless
determines
increase
cost
living
special
factor
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
justifies
higher
appeal
appeals
ninth
circuit
held
district
abused
discretion
concluding
secretary
position
substantially
justified
appeals
also
held
special
factors
relied
district
justified
increasing
hourly
rates
attorneys
justify
applying
multiplier
lodestar
amount
therefore
reduced
award
see
granted
secretary
petition
certiorari
questions
whether
government
position
substantially
justified
whether
courts
properly
identified
special
factors
justifying
award
excess
statute
cap
attorney
fees
ii
first
consider
whether
appeals
applied
correct
standard
reviewing
district
determination
secretary
position
substantially
justified
purposes
standard
review
decisions
judges
traditionally
divided
three
categories
denominated
questions
law
reviewable
de
novo
questions
fact
reviewable
clear
error
matters
discretion
reviewable
abuse
discretion
ninth
circuit
treated
issue
substantial
justification
involving
last
courts
appeals
treated
involving
first
see
battles
farm
pierce
app
cert
pending
dubose
pierce
trial
determinations
question
standard
appellate
review
answered
relatively
explicit
statutory
command
see
discretion
may
allow
prevailing
party
reasonable
attorney
fee
others
answer
provided
long
history
appellate
practice
trial
determination
one
neither
clear
statutory
prescription
historical
tradition
exists
uncommonly
difficult
derive
pattern
appellate
review
questions
analytical
framework
yield
correct
answer
see
rosenberg
judicial
discretion
trial
viewed
syracuse
rev
hereinafter
rosenberg
today
past
shall
attempt
discern
create
comprehensive
test
persuaded
significant
relevant
factors
call
abuse
discretion
standard
present
case
turn
first
language
structure
governing
statute
provides
attorney
fees
shall
awarded
unless
finds
position
substantially
justified
emphasis
added
formulation
opposed
simply
unless
position
substantially
justified
emphasizes
fact
determination
district
make
thus
suggests
deference
district
upon
appeal
inference
compelled
certainly
available
moreover
related
provision
eaja
requires
administrative
agency
award
attorney
fees
litigant
prevailing
agency
adjudication
government
position
substantially
justified
specifies
agency
decision
may
reversed
reviewing
finds
failure
make
award
unsupported
substantial
evidence
doubt
intent
interlocking
scheme
appeals
accord
deference
agency
determination
position
substantially
justified
determination
federal
district
however
inference
deference
assuredly
compelled
recently
observed
regard
problem
determining
whether
mixed
questions
law
fact
treated
questions
law
fact
purposes
appellate
review
sometimes
decision
turned
determination
matter
sound
administration
justice
one
judicial
actor
better
positioned
another
decide
issue
question
miller
fenton
think
consideration
relevant
present
context
well
argues
favor
deferential
review
begin
elements
bear
upon
whether
government
position
substantially
justified
may
known
district
infrequently
question
turn
upon
merely
law
evidence
regarding
facts
reason
settlement
conferences
pretrial
activities
district
may
insights
conveyed
record
matters
whether
particular
evidence
worthy
relied
upon
whether
critical
facts
easily
verified
government
moreover
even
district
judge
full
knowledge
factual
setting
acquired
appellate
acquisition
often
come
unusual
expense
requiring
undertake
unaccustomed
task
reviewing
entire
record
determine
whether
existed
usual
minimum
support
merits
determination
made
factfinder
determine
whether
urging
opposite
merits
determination
substantially
justified
cases
present
one
attorney
fee
determination
involve
judgment
ultimately
based
upon
evaluation
purely
legal
issue
governing
litigation
assumed
however
de
novo
review
require
appellate
invest
substantial
additional
time
since
case
grapple
legal
issue
merits
contrary
one
expect
government
case
feeble
provide
grounds
eaja
award
often
settlement
failure
appeal
adverse
judgment
moreover
even
merits
appeal
even
occurs
simultaneously
goes
panel
entertains
appeal
attorney
fee
award
latter
legal
question
precisely
merits
law
government
substantially
justified
believing
eaja
appeals
investment
appellate
energy
either
fail
produce
normal
benefits
come
appellate
decision
question
law
else
strangely
distort
appellate
process
former
result
obtain
intervening
legal
decisions
relevant
circuit
law
circuit
time
eaja
appeal
quite
clear
question
government
substantially
justified
believing
entirely
historical
interest
hand
law
circuit
remains
unsettled
time
eaja
appeal
ruling
government
substantially
justified
believing
unless
reason
think
changed
since
effectively
establish
circuit
law
peculiar
secondhanded
fashion
moreover
possibility
latter
occurrence
encourage
needless
merits
appeals
government
since
know
appeal
victorious
plaintiff
appeals
denial
attorney
fees
loss
merits
converted
loss
merits
without
opportunity
victory
merits
untoward
consequences
substantially
reduced
entirely
avoided
adopting
standard
review
another
factor
find
significant
described
follows
professor
rosenberg
one
good
reasons
conferring
discretion
trial
judge
sheer
impracticability
formulating
rule
decision
matter
issue
many
questions
arise
litigation
amenable
regulation
rule
involve
multifarious
fleeting
special
narrow
facts
utterly
resist
generalization
least
time
problem
rule
diffuseness
circumstances
novelty
vagueness
similar
reasons
argue
allowing
experience
develop
appears
sound
reason
conferring
discretion
magistrate
useful
analogue
course
development
rule
federal
rules
civil
procedure
providing
spite
litigant
tardiness
rule
specifies
deadline
trial
discretion
may
order
trial
jury
issues
years
appellate
courts
consistently
upheld
trial
judges
allowing
refusing
jury
trials
laid
two
guidelines
exercise
discretionary
power
products
cumulative
experience
guidelines
relate
justifiability
tardy
litigant
delay
absence
prejudice
adversary
time
experience
allowed
formless
problem
take
shape
contours
guiding
principle
emerge
rosenberg
must
acknowledged
militating
use
standard
present
case
substantial
amount
liability
produced
district
judge
decision
sort
decision
ordinarily
substantial
consequences
one
might
expect
reviewed
intensively
regard
however
present
case
characteristic
eaja
attorney
fee
cases
median
award
less
see
annual
report
director
administrative
office
courts
fees
expenses
awarded
equal
access
justice
act
pp
table
eaja
awards
fiscal
year
department
health
human
services
averaged
think
generality
rather
exception
must
form
basis
rule
sum
although
acknowledged
outset
resolution
issue
rigorously
scientific
satisfied
text
statute
permits
sound
judicial
administration
counsels
deferential
review
district
decision
regarding
attorney
fees
eaja
addition
furthering
goals
described
implement
view
request
attorney
fees
result
second
major
litigation
hensley
eckerhart
iii
proceeding
consider
whether
trial
abused
discretion
case
one
abstract
legal
issue
resolve
meaning
phrase
substantially
justified
appeals
following
ninth
circuit
precedent
held
government
position
substantially
justified
reasonable
basis
law
fact
source
formulation
committee
report
prepared
time
original
enactment
eaja
commented
test
whether
government
position
substantially
justified
essentially
one
reasonableness
law
fact
conf
petition
government
urges
us
hold
substantially
justified
means
litigating
position
must
substance
fair
possibility
success
brief
petitioner
respondents
hand
contend
phrase
imports
something
simple
reasonableness
standard
brief
respondents
though
somewhat
vague
precisely
high
standard
strong
showing
addressing
issue
make
clear
outset
think
appropriate
substitute
formula
congress
adopted
judicially
crafted
revision
whether
reasonable
basis
law
fact
anything
else
substantially
justified
test
statute
prescribes
issue
framed
terms
said
nevertheless
obvious
need
elaborate
upon
meaning
phrase
broad
range
interpretations
described
attributable
fact
word
substantial
two
quite
different
indeed
almost
contrary
connotations
one
hand
mean
onsiderable
amount
value
like
large
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
example
statement
election
substantial
majority
hand
mean
hat
substance
main
ibid
example
statement
said
substantially
true
depending
upon
connotation
one
selects
substantially
justified
susceptible
interpretations
ranging
government
respondents
however
dealing
field
law
provides
guidance
matter
judicial
review
agency
action
field
issue
regularly
proceeds
rubric
substantial
evidence
set
forth
administrative
procedure
act
phrase
mean
large
considerable
amount
evidence
rather
relevant
evidence
reasonable
mind
might
accept
adequate
support
conclusion
consolidated
edison
nlrb
area
related
present
case
another
way
test
avoiding
imposition
attorney
fees
resisting
discovery
district
whether
resistance
substantially
justified
fed
rules
civ
proc
knowledge
never
described
meaning
justified
high
degree
rather
said
satisfied
genuine
dispute
advisory
committee
notes
amendments
fed
rule
civ
proc
see
quaker
chair
litton
business
systems
sdny
reasonable
people
differ
appropriateness
contested
action
reygo
pacific
johnston
pump
see
wright
miller
federal
practice
procedure
sec
musella
cch
fed
sec
sdny
smith
montgomery
county
supp
md
view
therefore
two
commonly
used
connotations
word
substantially
one
naturally
conveyed
phrase
us
justified
high
degree
rather
justified
substance
main
justified
degree
satisfy
reasonable
person
different
reasonable
basis
law
fact
formulation
adopted
ninth
circuit
vast
majority
courts
appeals
addressed
issue
see
yoffe
dubose
pierce
citizens
council
delaware
county
brinegar
anderson
heckler
hanover
building
materials
guiffrida
trident
marine
construction
district
engineer
ramos
haig
foster
tourtellotte
per
curiam
boxes
boned
beef
cert
denied
sub
nom
feedlots
ashburn
substantially
justified
means
course
merely
undeserving
sanctions
frivolousness
assuredly
standard
government
litigation
reasonable
person
approve
respondents
press
upon
us
excerpt
house
committee
report
pertaining
reenactment
eaja
read
follows
several
courts
held
correctly
substantial
justification
means
merely
reasonable
congress
rejected
standard
reasonably
justified
favor
substantially
justified
test
must
mere
reasonableness
omitted
even
ordinary
situation
house
report
suffice
fix
meaning
language
reporting
committee
even
draft
much
less
willing
accord
force
present
case
since
clearest
indication
congressional
command
persuade
us
adopt
test
accord
prior
usage
unadministrable
mere
reasonableness
test
reasonableness
test
clearly
convincingly
justified
one
even
respondents
suggests
applicable
simply
accepted
ledge
hold
anchor
steady
consistent
judicial
behavior
iv
reach
last
merits
whether
district
abused
discretion
finding
government
position
substantially
justified
parties
argue
purposes
inquiry
courts
rely
objective
indicia
terms
settlement
agreement
stage
proceedings
merits
decided
views
courts
merits
suggest
avoid
possibly
inexact
process
assessing
strength
government
position
disagree
objective
indicia
relevant
think
provide
conclusive
answer
either
direction
present
case
respondents
contend
lack
substantial
justification
government
position
demonstrated
willingness
settle
litigation
unfavorable
terms
factors
however
might
explain
settlement
equally
well
example
change
substantive
policy
instituted
new
administration
unfavorable
terms
settlement
agreement
without
inquiry
reasons
settlement
conclusively
establish
weakness
government
position
hold
otherwise
distort
truth
penalize
thereby
discourage
useful
settlements
respondents
contend
weakness
government
position
established
objective
fact
merits
decided
pleadings
stage
disagree
least
dispute
centers
upon
questions
law
rather
fact
summary
disposition
proves
district
judge
efficient
parties
rely
upon
objective
indicia
consisting
views
expressed
courts
merits
government
position
obviously
fact
one
agreed
disagreed
government
establish
whether
position
substantially
justified
conceivably
government
take
position
substantially
justified
yet
win
even
likely
take
position
substantially
justified
yet
lose
nevertheless
string
losses
indicative
even
string
successes
however
say
category
objective
indicia
enough
decide
present
case
respondents
emphasize
every
hear
merits
nine
district
courts
two
courts
appeals
rejected
government
position
secretary
responds
stays
issued
appeals
second
circuit
reflect
view
merits
objectively
establish
substantial
justification
unlikely
granted
government
petitions
certiorari
two
cases
review
issue
secretary
argument
substantial
brief
petitioner
respondents
reply
neither
stays
grants
certiorari
reliable
indications
substantial
merit
parse
arguments
respondents
side
case
least
sufficient
force
possibly
state
basis
objective
indications
alone
district
abused
discretion
finding
substantial
justification
turn
actual
merits
government
litigating
position
government
argued
program
established
permissive
rather
mandatory
language
secretary
authorized
make
contract
make
payments
supp
iv
emphasis
added
contrasts
mandatory
language
congress
used
creating
related
housing
subsidy
program
secretary
shall
make
contract
make
emphasis
added
moreover
government
argued
position
supported
decision
pennsylvania
lynn
app
held
program
authorized
permissive
statutory
language
suspended
secretary
concluded
implementation
interfere
housing
goals
finally
government
contended
congress
authorized
sufficient
funds
conduct
program
well
two
related
subsidy
programs
secretary
discretion
suspend
program
respondents
argued
rebuttal
statutory
language
made
clear
program
mandatory
shall
established
initial
operating
expense
level
shall
established
secretary
later
days
august
supp
iv
project
owner
shall
pay
secretary
rental
charges
collected
excess
basic
rental
charges
excess
charges
shall
credited
reserve
fund
used
secretary
make
additional
assistance
payments
furthermore
respondents
argued
lynn
support
government
position
secretary
contend
case
program
inconsistent
national
housing
policy
also
pointed
direct
precedents
time
government
took
position
present
case
nine
adverse
district
decisions
finally
respondents
argued
secretary
need
additional
authorization
reserve
fund
excess
rental
charges
accumulated
tens
millions
dollars
used
payments
say
description
commands
conclusion
government
position
substantially
justified
accordingly
affirm
ninth
circuit
holding
district
judge
abuse
discretion
found
final
issue
us
whether
amount
attorney
fees
award
proper
well
established
standard
applies
see
hensley
eckerhart
pennsylvania
delaware
valley
citizens
council
clean
air
blackmun
concurring
part
dissenting
part
eaja
provides
attorney
fees
shall
based
upon
prevailing
market
rates
kind
quality
services
furnished
shall
awarded
excess
per
hour
unless
determines
increase
cost
living
special
factor
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
justifies
higher
fee
ii
allowing
fees
rate
excess
cap
adjusted
inflation
district
relied
upon
circumstances
arguably
come
within
single
example
special
factor
described
statute
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
turn
first
meaning
provision
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
meant
merely
lawyers
skilled
experienced
enough
try
case
short
supply
effectively
eliminate
cap
since
prevailing
market
rates
kind
quality
services
furnished
obviously
determined
relative
supply
kind
quality
services
limited
availability
interpreted
special
factor
factor
virtually
always
present
services
market
rate
provided
think
congress
meant
rates
lawyers
relevant
city
even
entire
country
come
exceed
per
hour
adjusted
inflation
rate
govern
instead
statutory
cap
contrary
special
factor
formulation
suggests
congress
thought
hour
generally
quite
enough
public
reimbursement
lawyers
fees
whatever
local
national
market
might
exception
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
must
refer
attorneys
qualified
proceedings
specialized
sense
rather
general
legal
competence
think
refers
attorneys
distinctive
knowledge
specialized
skill
needful
litigation
question
opposed
extraordinary
level
general
lawyerly
knowledge
ability
useful
litigation
examples
former
identifiable
practice
specialty
patent
law
knowledge
foreign
law
language
qualifications
necessary
obtained
rates
excess
cap
reimbursement
limit
allowed
reason
need
preserve
intended
effectiveness
cap
think
special
factors
envisioned
exception
must
broad
general
application
need
specify
might
include
nothing
relied
upon
district
case
novelty
difficulty
issues
undesirability
case
work
ability
counsel
results
obtained
app
pet
cert
factors
applicable
broad
spectrum
litigation
little
routine
reasons
market
rates
factor
customary
fees
awards
cases
even
worse
even
routine
reason
market
rates
rather
description
market
rates
abuse
discretion
district
rely
factors
final
factor
considered
district
contingent
nature
fee
also
generally
applicable
regarded
special
reason
exceeding
statutory
cap
issue
quite
different
question
enhancement
faced
last
term
pennsylvania
delaware
valley
citizens
council
clean
air
delaware
valley
ii
eaja
differs
sort
statutory
scheme
issue
contains
special
factor
requirement
fundamentally
designed
reimburse
reasonable
fees
without
limit
cap
exceeded
neither
client
paying
reasonable
hourly
fee
client
paying
reasonable
contingent
fee
fully
compensated
moreover
impossible
regard
use
eaja
means
fostering
practice
nonmonetary
claims
claims
certain
favored
category
cases
unlike
statutes
discussed
delaware
valley
ii
eaja
subsidy
directed
category
litigation
identified
advance
attorney
may
possible
base
economically
viable
practice
upon
acceptance
nonmonetary
cases
clean
air
act
cases
fair
prospect
victory
quite
impossible
base
practice
upon
acceptance
nonmonetary
cases
fair
prospect
government
position
substantially
justified
even
lawyer
assess
strength
government
case
time
initial
discussions
prospective
client
lawyer
rarely
able
assess
degree
certainty
likelihood
government
position
deemed
unreasonable
produce
eaja
award
sure
allowing
contingency
special
factor
might
cause
eaja
foster
practice
broad
category
litigation
federal
government
besides
fact
effect
diluted
insignificant
think
congress
purpose
providing
reimbursement
small
category
cases
subsidize
litigation
conclude
therefore
none
reasons
relied
upon
district
increase
rate
reimbursement
statutory
special
factor
ordered
footnotes
contrary
justice
brennan
suggestion
post
analysis
convert
statutory
term
substantially
justified
reasonably
justified
justice
brennan
arguments
force
statutory
criterion
substantially
correct
rather
substantially
justified
position
justified
even
though
correct
believe
substantially
part
justified
reasonable
person
think
correct
reasonable
basis
law
fact
perhaps
possible
argue
congress
intended
create
dichotomy
phrase
kind
quality
services
furnished
first
part
later
reference
attorneys
qualified
proceedings
involved
meaning
former
refer
legal
services
provided
may
quite
de
luxe
latter
refer
legal
services
really
needed
case
may
quite
de
luxe
services
really
needed
argument
run
reimbursed
rate
cap
problem
provisions
define
limit
statutory
term
reasonable
attorney
fees
see
supra
since
primary
term
assuredly
embraces
notion
fees
must
relate
services
kind
quality
needed
case
phrase
prevailing
market
rates
kind
quality
services
furnished
must
fact
refer
kind
quality
services
furnished
needed
reading
besides
distorting
text
produces
peculiar
result
attorney
fees
services
needlessly
high
quality
reimbursable
per
hour
beyond
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
justice
blackmun
join
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
agree
award
attorney
fees
equal
access
justice
act
eaja
appropriate
case
agree
courts
adhere
statutory
hourly
cap
fees
therefore
concur
judgment
affirming
decision
award
fees
remanding
new
determination
amount
disagree
however
reasoning
agree
appellate
courts
review
district
eaja
fee
awards
abuse
discretion
view
government
may
prove
position
substantially
justified
showing
merely
reasonable
therefore
although
join
parts
ii
iv
opinion
join
part
iii
believe
interpretation
predicate
showing
party
obtain
fee
award
exceeding
statutory
cap
existed
special
factor
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
stingier
congress
intended
join
part
opinion
concerned
government
vast
resources
force
citizens
acquiescing
adverse
government
action
rather
vindicating
rights
simply
threatening
costly
litigation
congress
enacted
eaja
waiving
sovereign
general
statutory
immunity
fee
awards
creating
limited
exception
american
rule
awarding
attorneys
fees
prevailing
parties
pp
consequently
qualified
party
defined
act
prevails
adversarial
proceeding
sounding
tort
eaja
prescribes
shall
award
fees
expenses
unless
finds
position
substantially
justified
special
circumstances
make
award
unjust
first
eaja
case
called
upon
consider
phrase
substantially
justified
begins
proper
plain
meaning
statutory
language
points
substantially
word
precise
singular
definition
indeed
word
bears
two
arguably
different
relevant
definitions
considerable
amount
value
like
large
substance
main
ante
see
also
webster
third
new
international
dictionary
considerable
amount
value
worth
solid
firm
foundation
specified
large
degree
main
concludes
agree
extent
different
congress
intended
latter
meaning
unfortunately
feels
duty
bound
go
beyond
words
enacted
congress
fashion
substitute
phrase
using
perceives
legally
precise
term
test
upon
alights
initially
reasonable
basis
law
fact
standard
adopted
courts
ante
phrase
often
mentioned
legislative
history
explication
substantially
justified
alternative
phraseology
inherently
precise
statutory
language
fact
may
less
equates
test
reasonableness
ante
standard
rejected
congress
significantly
forgiving
one
actually
adopted
senate
judiciary
committee
considered
rejected
amendment
substituting
phrase
reasonably
justified
substantially
justified
clearly
committee
equate
reasonable
substantial
contrary
understood
two
terms
embrace
different
burdens
reasonable
variety
connotations
may
defined
absurd
ridiculous
webster
new
third
international
dictionary
even
strongest
term
implies
position
necessarily
much
merit
however
seen
substantial
different
definition
substance
main
thus
word
connotes
solid
position
position
firm
foundation
true
reasonable
substantial
overlap
somewhat
substantial
weakest
reasonable
strongest
overlap
identity
therefore
although
congress
may
well
intended
use
substantial
weaker
sense
reason
believe
substantial
reason
disbelieve
discuss
congress
intended
word
mean
reasonable
weaker
sense
underlying
problem
methodology
uses
words
terms
similar
identical
meanings
substitute
standard
rather
aid
choosing
among
assertedly
different
meanings
statutory
language
thus
instead
relying
legislative
history
tools
interpretation
help
resolve
ambiguity
word
substantial
uses
tools
essentially
jettison
phrase
crafted
congress
point
well
illustrated
government
position
case
content
term
substantially
justified
government
asks
us
hold
may
avoid
fees
position
reasonable
satisfied
even
substitution
asked
hold
position
reasonable
substance
fair
possibility
success
brief
petitioner
government
successive
definitions
may
stray
far
one
end
product
significantly
removed
substantially
justified
believe
congress
intended
eaja
award
fees
government
position
one
substance
slight
possibility
success
hope
government
rarely
engages
litigation
fitting
definition
surely
often
enough
warrant
million
attorney
fees
congress
expected
spend
original
eaja
life
view
substantially
justified
means
merely
reasonable
aside
conforming
words
congress
actually
chose
bolstered
eaja
legislative
history
phrase
substantially
justified
congressional
attempt
fashion
middle
ground
earlier
unsuccessful
proposal
award
fees
cases
government
prevail
department
justice
proposal
award
fees
government
position
arbitrary
frivolous
unreasonable
groundless
far
occupying
middle
ground
test
reasonableness
firmly
encamped
near
position
espoused
justice
department
moreover
house
committee
report
pertaining
eaja
reenactment
expressly
substantially
justified
means
mere
reasonableness
although
agree
report
dispositive
committee
unequivocal
rejection
pure
reasonableness
standard
course
considering
bill
reenacting
eaja
deserving
weight
finally
however
lopsided
weight
authority
lower
courts
meaning
substantially
justified
might
lower
opinions
longer
nearly
unanimous
district
columbia
third
eighth
federal
circuits
adopted
standard
higher
mere
reasonableness
sixth
circuit
considering
question
en
banc
see
riddle
secretary
health
human
services
adopting
higher
standard
vacated
rehearing
en
banc
lee
johnson
acres
land
gavette
opm
ca
fed
en
banc
spencer
nlrb
app
sum
journey
substantially
justified
reasonable
basis
law
fact
test
reasonableness
crystallize
law
true
congress
intent
instead
allows
government
creep
standard
towards
substance
fair
possibility
success
position
believe
congress
intentionally
avoided
view
hold
government
avoid
fees
makes
clear
showing
position
solid
basis
opposed
marginal
basis
unreasonable
basis
law
fact
may
less
anchored
test
reasonableness
debatable
proposition
excuse
abandon
test
congress
enacted
ii
also
disagree
discussion
circumstances
supporting
fee
enhancement
beyond
adjusted
inflation
cap
set
congress
although
agree
lower
courts
judgment
regard
stand
statute
courts
may
award
fees
excess
cap
unless
special
factor
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
justifies
higher
fee
ii
district
found
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
also
additional
special
factors
warranting
increase
deciding
however
district
appeals
analyses
erroneously
mirrored
analysis
statute
without
hourly
rate
limitation
congress
clearly
meant
contain
potential
costs
eaja
limiting
hourly
rate
attorneys
fees
awarded
consequently
consideration
factors
like
counsel
customary
rate
perfectly
appropriate
justify
exceeding
eaja
cap
hold
otherwise
render
cap
nothing
advisory
despite
congress
expressed
intent
permit
higher
awards
rare
cases
said
job
decide
meaning
term
special
factor
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
begins
single
expressed
special
factor
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
holds
phrase
refers
attorney
required
articulable
specialization
refer
limited
availability
attorneys
experienced
skilled
enough
handle
proceedings
involved
reasons
allowing
enhancement
extraordinary
skill
experience
even
required
render
cap
nugatory
since
factors
merely
set
market
rate
tidy
analysis
simplistic
striking
aspect
holding
regard
willingness
ignore
plain
meaning
language
exception
rare
eaja
case
highly
experienced
attorneys
truly
required
neophyte
lawyer
qualified
proceedings
involved
nonpatent
lawyer
handle
patent
case
interpretation
might
nonetheless
appropriate
cap
otherwise
actually
rendered
meaningless
case
first
must
keep
mind
nature
cases
congress
envisioned
result
fee
award
government
position
substantially
justified
observation
takes
much
force
reasoning
rare
case
attorney
exceptional
skill
necessary
government
position
weak
enough
warrant
eaja
award
second
phrase
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
read
conjunction
special
factor
reflects
congressional
judgment
price
lawyers
generally
exceeds
cap
trend
alone
justify
increase
therefore
awarding
enhancement
cases
extraordinary
experience
skill
required
write
cap
statute
third
economic
analysis
assumes
market
price
services
rendered
always
precisely
known
assumption
share
one
reason
believe
congress
shared
reasonable
hourly
rate
determined
exactitude
according
preset
formulation
accounting
nature
complexity
every
type
case
therefore
courts
often
assume
attorney
normal
hourly
rate
reasonable
case
public
interest
counsel
reasonable
rate
generally
rate
charged
attorney
like
skill
experience
reputation
blum
stenson
certainly
adjustments
appropriate
fee
charged
line
nature
services
rendered
however
adjustments
often
difficult
make
given
prevailing
market
rate
determined
reference
particular
attorney
involved
rather
minimally
qualified
hypothetical
lawyer
fee
determination
become
second
major
litigation
hensley
eckerhart
moreover
extent
even
simple
case
higher
hourly
rates
may
offset
fewer
hours
billed
due
counsel
greater
efficiency
absent
statutory
cap
factors
used
eaja
analysis
extensively
used
analysis
however
showing
particular
attorney
retained
normally
charges
statutory
cap
avail
fee
applicant
nothing
eaja
although
may
dispositive
therefore
simply
wrong
asserts
allow
showing
extraordinary
skill
experience
rare
case
required
justify
enhanced
award
cap
rendered
meaningless
far
logic
supporting
patent
lawyer
exception
fraction
bar
qualified
handle
case
attorneys
may
charge
premium
services
supports
enhancement
skill
experience
equally
troubling
requirement
special
factor
must
broad
general
application
ante
given
explanation
limitation
beyond
declaration
necessary
preserve
efficacy
cap
willing
say
special
factor
everything
relied
upon
given
example
anything
special
factor
specialization
already
considered
falling
within
limited
availability
qualified
attorneys
proceedings
involved
example
rejected
lower
courts
list
factors
entirety
seems
leaves
nothing
remaining
strained
interpretation
apparently
reading
words
act
unnecessary
see
engineers
action
smoking
health
cab
app
cf
kungys
provision
statute
construed
entirely
redundant
special
factor
may
readily
analogized
factors
identified
blum
enhance
lodestar
figure
blum
held
lodestar
amount
reasonable
hourly
rate
multiplied
number
hours
billed
presumably
reasonable
fee
however
also
held
upward
adjustment
may
appropriate
rare
case
fee
applicant
offers
specific
evidence
show
quality
service
rendered
superior
one
reasonably
expect
light
hourly
rates
charged
success
exceptional
internal
quotations
omitted
analogizing
eaja
context
lodestar
calculated
multiplying
reasonable
rate
capped
number
hours
billed
amount
presumably
proper
award
however
factor
exists
justify
enhancement
lodestar
amount
enhancement
eaja
award
might
also
appropriate
unlike
lower
courts
approach
rule
read
cap
statute
predicted
blum
lodestar
enhancement
appropriate
rare
case
although
blum
enhancers
constitute
situation
limited
availability
qualified
counsel
statute
expressly
allows
considered
miserly
refusal
accede
statutory
command
unjustified
unwarranted
therefore
concur
judgment
fee
calculation
view
term
substantially
justified
imposing
higher
burden
government
reasoning
part
iv
opinion
applies
perforce
view
case
purposes
eaja
different
federal
rule
civil
procedure
served
substantial
evidence
test
used
review
agency
determinations
believe
meanings
given
term
substantial
contexts
govern
left
open
whether
contingent
nature
fee
also
justify
enhancement
however
much
reasons
stated
question
pertinent
eaja
case
one
thing
say
enhancement
necessary
compensate
attorney
victory
uncertain
another
thing
entirely
say
enhancement
necessary
compensate
attorney
lack
substantial
justification
uncertain
justice
white
justice
joins
concurring
part
dissenting
part
agree
majority
interpretation
term
substantially
justified
used
equal
access
justice
act
eaja
however
believe
district
assessment
whether
government
legal
position
substantially
justified
reviewed
de
novo
attorney
fees
award
case
sustained
standard
review
dissent
parts
ii
iv
majority
opinion
majority
acknowledges
neither
language
structure
eaja
compel
deferential
review
district
determination
whether
government
position
substantially
justified
ante
fact
statute
wholly
silent
standard
determinations
reviewed
congressional
silence
face
general
rule
de
novo
review
legal
issues
eaja
special
purpose
encouraging
meritorious
suits
government
suggests
different
result
reached
majority
congress
adopted
eaja
certainly
aware
general
rule
issues
law
reviewed
de
novo
issues
fact
reviewed
clear
error
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
swint
congress
known
whether
particular
legal
position
substantially
justified
question
law
rather
fact
historical
facts
established
question
resolved
legal
analysis
relevant
statutory
decisional
authorities
appellate
courts
expected
perform
district
columbia
circuit
observed
special
expertise
experience
appellate
courts
assessing
relative
force
competing
interpretations
applications
legal
norms
makes
case
de
novo
review
judgments
whether
government
legal
position
substantially
justified
even
stronger
case
review
paradigmatic
conclusions
law
spencer
nlrb
app
cert
denied
thus
likely
congress
expected
courts
appeals
apply
de
novo
standard
review
district
assessment
whether
government
interpretation
law
substantially
justified
purposes
eaja
apply
district
assessment
whether
government
interpretation
law
correct
underlying
litigation
de
novo
appellate
review
whether
government
legal
position
substantially
justified
also
foster
consistency
predictability
eaja
litigation
appeals
may
required
majority
abuse
discretion
standard
affirm
one
district
holding
government
legal
position
substantially
justified
another
district
holding
position
substantially
justified
long
district
opinion
substantiality
government
case
rests
defensible
construction
application
statute
view
command
appeals
defer
even
though
view
legal
issue
quite
different
availability
attorney
fees
difficult
predict
vary
circuit
circuit
even
within
particular
circuit
uncertainty
potential
availability
attorney
fees
view
undermine
eaja
purpose
encouraging
challenges
unreasonable
governmental
action
see
spencer
supra
finally
federal
courts
appeals
concluded
near
unanimity
close
scrutiny
de
novo
review
applied
district
courts
assessments
whether
government
legal
position
substantially
justified
see
brinker
guiffrida
estridge
haitian
refugee
center
meese
yoffe
russell
national
mediation
essex
electro
engineers
ca
fed
hicks
heckler
sigmon
fuel
tva
boudin
thomas
boxes
boned
beef
cert
denied
sub
nom
feedlots
spencer
supra
weight
appellate
authority
reinforces
view
whether
government
interpretation
law
substantially
justified
appropriate
question
de
novo
review
ii
believe
district
conclusion
government
position
litigation
substantially
justified
withstand
appellate
scrutiny
de
novo
standard
review
housing
statute
issue
case
provided
three
subsidy
programs
program
program
program
secretary
failure
implement
last
programs
challenged
respondents
statute
provided
secretary
authorized
make
contract
make
payments
supp
iv
emphasis
added
contrast
statute
stated
secretary
shall
make
contract
make
payments
emphasis
added
concluding
congress
authorized
commit
funds
sufficient
operate
three
subsidy
programs
secretary
hills
decided
devote
available
funds
clearly
mandatory
program
certain
commitments
program
rather
spread
funds
among
three
programs
whether
courts
might
differ
secretary
hills
scope
discretion
decline
implement
program
see
ante
given
statutory
language
existing
case
law
conclusion
without
substantial
justification
statutory
provisions
instructing
secretary
make
payments
merely
authorizing
make
payments
reasonably
construed
vesting
secretary
discretion
implementation
program
congress
intended
give
secretary
choice
matter
defensible
believe
congress
directed
secretary
shall
make
contract
make
payments
moreover
decision
pennsylvania
lynn
app
offered
support
secretary
position
appeals
held
case
secretary
abused
discretion
suspending
program
secretary
likewise
authorized
make
contract
make
payments
concluded
program
serving
national
housing
goals
lynn
case
course
fours
one
however
lynn
suggests
secretary
degree
discretion
whether
implement
housing
programs
couched
clearly
mandatory
statutory
language
decision
given
secretary
hills
reason
believe
discretion
properly
exercised
regard
program
conclude
upon
de
novo
review
secretary
refusal
implement
program
substantially
justified
reverse
award
attorney
fees
eaja
congress
remained
silent
standard
review
applied
district
determinations
whether
attorney
fee
award
appropriate
yet
explicitly
directed
abuse
discretion
standard
applied
similar
determinations
governmental
agencies
see
seem
militate
rather
favor
rule
adopted
majority
see
ante
reasonable
inference
drawn
difference
statutory
provisions
governing
attorney
fees
congress
knew
specify
abuse
discretion
standard
chose
congress
choose
regard
attorney
fee
awards
district
courts
majority
suggests
abuse
discretion
standard
desirable
order
limit
amount
appellate
energy
expended
cases
unlikely
yield
benefits
ante
thought
decisions
concerning
allocation
appellate
resources
better
left
congress
courts
appeals
concentrate
efforts
clarifying
law
expense
correcting
district
errors
may
affect
parties
particular
case
congress
make
policy
choice
event
law
circuit
indeed
quite
clear
time
eaja
appeal
appellate
may
often
expend
relatively
little
energy
ascertaining
whether
law
also
reasonably
clear
earlier
date
course
cases
law
circuit
remains
unsettled
time
eaja
appeal
appellate
may
provide
needed
guidance
government
individuals
similar
legal
claims
majority
concern
de
novo
review
force
government
take
needless
merits
appeals
appear
shared
government
argued
throughout
litigation
question
whether
legal
position
substantially
justified
reviewed
de
novo
standard
rather
abuse
discretion
standard
dubose
pierce
cert
pending
appeals
held
secretary
refusal
implement
program
substantially
justified
purposes
eaja
relied
heavily
pennsylvania
lynn
concluding
governing
law
extent
existed
mandate
hud
surrender
early
litigation
bec
render
hud
position
clearly
unjustifiable
even
several
lower
courts
ruled
secretary
program
concludes
amount
award
must
reconsidered
agree
respect
hence
join
part
opinion