irvin
dowd
argued
november
decided
june
petitioner
tried
indiana
state
convicted
murder
sentenced
death
six
murders
committed
vicinity
evansville
extensively
covered
news
media
locality
aroused
great
excitement
indignation
throughout
vanderburgh
county
evansville
located
adjoining
gibson
county
shortly
petitioner
arrested
prosecutor
vanderburgh
county
evansville
police
officials
issued
press
releases
intensively
publicized
stating
petitioner
confessed
six
murders
petitioner
indicated
vanderburgh
county
counsel
appointed
defend
immediately
sought
change
venue
granted
adjoining
gibson
county
alleging
widespread
inflammatory
publicity
also
highly
prejudiced
inhabitants
gibson
county
petitioner
counsel
sought
change
venue
county
county
sufficiently
removed
evansville
locality
permit
unprejudiced
fair
trial
denied
trial
jury
panel
consisted
persons
excused
cause
fixed
opinions
guilt
petitioner
finally
served
jury
admitted
thought
petitioner
guilty
indicated
notwithstanding
opinion
render
impartial
verdict
petitioner
conviction
sustained
state
applied
federal
district
writ
habeas
corpus
denied
held
petitioner
accorded
fair
impartial
trial
entitled
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
conviction
void
judgment
denying
habeas
corpus
vacated
case
remanded
district
proceedings
affording
state
reasonable
time
retry
petitioner
pp
since
state
held
attempt
made
secure
impartial
jury
change
venue
appears
jury
obtained
county
venue
changed
duty
grant
second
change
venue
order
afford
accused
trial
impartial
jury
state
statute
purporting
permit
one
change
venue
face
subject
attack
due
process
grounds
pp
failure
state
accord
fair
hearing
one
accused
crime
violates
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
trial
jury
fair
unless
jury
impartial
pp
circumstances
case
duty
federal
appeals
evaluate
independently
voir
dire
testimony
impaneled
jurors
pp
record
case
said
petitioner
accorded
fair
trial
impartial
jury
pp
petitioner
entitled
freed
detention
sentence
death
pursuant
void
judgment
still
subject
custody
indictment
may
retried
another
indictment
district
allow
state
reasonable
time
retry
pp
james
lopp
theodore
lockyear
argued
cause
petitioner
brief
james
nafe
richard
givan
assistant
attorney
general
indiana
argued
cause
respondent
brief
edwin
steers
attorney
general
justice
clark
delivered
opinion
habeas
corpus
proceeding
brought
test
validity
petitioner
conviction
murder
sentence
death
circuit
gibson
county
indiana
indiana
affirmed
conviction
irvin
state
ind
denied
direct
review
certiorari
without
prejudice
filing
federal
habeas
corpus
exhausting
state
remedies
petitioner
immediately
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
district
northern
district
indiana
claiming
conviction
obtained
violation
fourteenth
amendment
receive
fair
trial
dismissed
proceeding
ground
petitioner
failed
exhaust
state
remedies
supp
appeal
appeals
seventh
circuit
affirmed
dismissal
granted
certiorari
remanded
appeals
decision
merits
remand
district
reconsideration
appeals
retained
jurisdiction
decided
claim
adversely
petitioner
granted
certiorari
stated
former
opinion
constitutional
claim
arises
way
six
murders
committed
vicinity
evansville
indiana
two
december
four
march
crimes
extensively
covered
news
media
locality
aroused
great
excitement
indignation
throughout
vanderburgh
county
evansville
located
adjoining
gibson
county
rural
county
approximately
inhabitants
petitioner
arrested
april
shortly
thereafter
prosecutor
vanderburgh
county
evansville
police
officials
issued
press
releases
intensively
publicized
stating
petitioner
confessed
six
murders
vanderburgh
county
grand
jury
soon
indicted
petitioner
murder
resulted
conviction
murder
whitney
wesley
kerr
allegedly
committed
vanderburgh
county
december
counsel
appointed
defend
petitioner
immediately
sought
change
venue
vanderburgh
county
granted
adjoining
gibson
county
alleging
widespread
inflammatory
publicity
also
highly
prejudiced
inhabitants
gibson
county
petitioner
counsel
october
sought
another
change
venue
gibson
county
county
sufficiently
removed
evansville
locality
fair
trial
prejudiced
motion
denied
apparently
pertinent
indiana
statute
allows
single
change
venue
outset
met
indiana
statute
providing
one
change
venue
shall
granted
county
wherein
offense
committed
since
petitioner
already
afforded
one
change
venue
denied
changes
solely
basis
statute
attacked
constitutionality
appeals
upheld
validity
however
light
gannon
porter
circuit
ind
believe
argument
poses
serious
problem
indiana
held
made
appear
attempt
actually
made
secure
impartial
jury
jury
obtained
county
present
venue
becomes
duty
judiciary
provide
every
accused
public
trial
impartial
jury
even
though
must
grant
second
change
venue
thus
contravene
statute
prosecution
attempts
distinguish
case
ground
district
attorney
conceded
fair
trial
la
porte
county
therefore
properly
ordered
second
change
venue
despite
language
statute
inasmuch
statute
says
nothing
concessions
believe
indiana
conditions
duty
judiciary
transfer
case
another
county
solely
upon
representation
prosecutor
regardless
trial
estimate
local
conditions
impartial
jury
may
impaneled
read
gannon
stands
proposition
necessity
transfer
depend
upon
totality
surrounding
facts
construction
statute
face
subject
attack
due
process
grounds
england
western
world
largely
taken
concepts
individual
liberty
dignity
worth
every
man
bequeathed
us
safeguards
preservation
priceless
trial
jury
right
become
much
american
english
although
said
fourteenth
amendment
demand
use
jury
trials
state
criminal
procedure
fay
new
york
palko
connecticut
every
state
constitutionally
provided
trial
jury
see
columbia
university
legislative
drafting
research
fund
index
digest
state
constitutions
essence
right
jury
trial
guarantees
criminally
accused
fair
trial
panel
impartial
indifferent
jurors
failure
accord
accused
fair
hearing
violates
even
minimal
standards
due
process
oliver
tumey
ohio
fair
trial
fair
tribunal
basic
requirement
due
process
murchison
ultimate
analysis
jury
strip
man
liberty
life
language
lord
coke
juror
must
indifferent
stands
unsworne
litt
verdict
must
based
upon
evidence
developed
trial
cf
thompson
city
louisville
true
regardless
heinousness
crime
charged
apparent
guilt
offender
station
life
occupies
written
law
early
chief
justice
marshall
burr
trial
theory
law
juror
formed
opinion
impartial
reynolds
required
however
jurors
totally
ignorant
facts
issues
involved
days
swift
widespread
diverse
methods
communication
important
case
expected
arouse
interest
public
vicinity
scarcely
best
qualified
serve
jurors
formed
impression
opinion
merits
case
particularly
true
criminal
cases
hold
mere
existence
preconceived
notion
guilt
innocence
accused
without
sufficient
rebut
presumption
prospective
juror
impartiality
establish
impossible
standard
sufficient
juror
lay
aside
impression
opinion
render
verdict
based
evidence
presented
spies
illinois
holt
reynolds
supra
adoption
rule
however
foreclose
inquiry
whether
given
case
application
rule
works
deprivation
prisoner
life
liberty
without
due
process
law
lisenba
california
stated
reynolds
test
whether
nature
strength
opinion
formed
law
necessarily
raise
presumption
partiality
question
thus
presented
one
mixed
law
fact
affirmative
issue
upon
challenger
unless
shows
actual
existence
opinion
mind
juror
raise
presumption
partiality
juror
need
necessarily
set
aside
positive
decided
opinion
formed
incompetent
even
though
expressed
stated
brown
allen
mixed
questions
application
constitutional
principles
facts
found
leave
duty
adjudication
federal
judge
therefore
duty
appeals
independently
evaluate
voir
dire
testimony
impaneled
jurors
rule
established
reynolds
finding
trial
upon
issue
force
prospective
juror
opinion
set
aside
reviewing
unless
error
manifest
later
cases
revisited
reynolds
citing
instance
proposition
findings
impartiality
set
aside
prejudice
manifest
holt
supra
spies
illinois
supra
hopt
utah
indiana
agrees
trial
jurors
fixed
preconceived
opinion
accused
guilt
denial
due
process
points
voir
dire
examination
discloses
juror
qualified
applicable
indiana
statute
true
presiding
judge
personally
examined
members
jury
panel
petitioner
peremptory
challenges
insisted
excused
cause
indicated
notwithstanding
opinion
render
impartial
verdict
chief
justice
hughes
observed
wood
impartiality
technical
conception
state
mind
ascertainment
mental
attitude
appropriate
indifference
constitution
lays
particular
tests
procedure
chained
ancient
artificial
formula
prejudice
clear
convincing
examination
current
community
pattern
thought
indicated
popular
news
media
singularly
revealing
example
petitioner
first
motion
change
venue
gibson
county
alleged
awaited
trial
petitioner
become
cause
celebre
small
community
much
curbstone
opinions
petitioner
guilt
even
punishment
receive
solicited
recorded
public
streets
roving
reporter
later
broadcast
local
stations
reading
exhibits
petitioner
attached
motion
indicates
barrage
newspaper
headlines
articles
cartoons
pictures
unleashed
six
seven
months
preceding
trial
motion
alleged
newspapers
stories
appeared
delivered
regularly
approximately
dwellings
gibson
county
addition
evansville
radio
tv
stations
likewise
blanketed
county
also
carried
extensive
newscasts
covering
incidents
stories
revealed
details
background
including
reference
crimes
committed
juvenile
convictions
arson
almost
years
previously
burglary
awol
charges
war
accused
parole
violator
headlines
announced
police
identification
faced
lie
detector
test
placed
scene
crime
six
murders
solved
petitioner
refused
confess
finally
announced
confession
six
murders
fact
indictment
four
indiana
reported
petitioner
offer
plead
guilty
promised
sentence
also
determination
hand
prosecutor
secure
death
penalty
petitioner
confessed
burglaries
modus
operandi
robberies
compared
murders
similarity
noted
one
story
dramatically
relayed
promise
sheriff
devote
life
securing
petitioner
execution
state
kentucky
petitioner
alleged
committed
one
six
murders
indiana
failed
another
characterized
petitioner
remorseless
without
conscience
also
found
sane
panel
doctors
many
stories
petitioner
described
confessed
slayer
six
parole
violator
artist
petitioner
counsel
quoted
received
much
criticism
irvin
counsel
pointed
way
excusing
attorney
subject
disbarment
refuse
represent
irvin
day
trial
newspapers
carried
story
irvin
orally
admitted
murder
kerr
victim
case
well
mary
holland
murder
wilhelmina
sailer
posey
county
slaughter
three
members
duncan
family
henderson
county
gainsaid
force
continued
adverse
publicity
caused
sustained
excitement
fostered
strong
prejudice
among
people
gibson
county
fact
second
day
devoted
selection
jury
newspapers
reported
strong
feelings
often
bitter
angry
rumbled
surface
extent
multiple
murders
three
one
family
aroused
feelings
throughout
area
emphasized
friday
prospective
jurors
questioned
excused
holding
biased
pretrial
opinions
days
later
feeling
described
pattern
deep
bitter
prejudice
former
spectator
comments
printed
newspapers
mind
made
think
guilty
hanged
finally
remarkable
understatement
headlines
reported
impartial
jurors
hard
find
panel
consisted
persons
excused
challenges
cause
fixed
opinions
guilt
petitioner
excused
conscientious
objection
imposition
death
penalty
maximum
allowed
peremptorily
challenged
petitioner
state
persons
two
alternates
selected
jurors
rest
excused
personal
grounds
deafness
doctor
orders
etc
examination
voir
dire
record
shows
prospective
jurors
almost
examined
point
members
panel
never
asked
whether
opinion
entertained
opinion
guilt
ranging
intensity
mere
suspicion
absolute
certainty
number
admitted
accused
place
dock
jury
opinions
want
jury
pattern
deep
bitter
prejudice
shown
present
throughout
community
cf
stroble
california
clearly
reflected
sum
total
voir
dire
examination
majority
jurors
finally
placed
jury
box
eight
thought
petitioner
guilty
opinion
permeating
minds
difficult
say
exclude
preconception
guilt
deliberations
influence
lurks
opinion
formed
persistent
unconsciously
fights
detachment
mental
processes
average
man
see
delaney
one
life
stake
accounting
frailties
human
nature
say
light
circumstances
finding
impartiality
meet
constitutional
standards
jurors
opinion
petitioner
guilty
familiar
material
facts
circumstances
involved
including
fact
murders
attributed
going
far
say
take
evidence
overcome
belief
one
said
give
defendant
benefit
doubt
innocent
another
stated
somewhat
certain
fixed
opinion
petitioner
guilt
doubt
juror
sincere
said
fair
impartial
petitioner
psychological
impact
requiring
declaration
one
fellows
often
father
many
many
times
admitted
prejudice
statement
impartiality
given
little
weight
one
jurors
put
ca
forget
hear
see
life
stake
requiring
much
petitioner
tried
atmosphere
undisturbed
huge
wave
public
passion
jury
one
members
admit
hearing
testimony
possessing
belief
guilt
stroble
california
shepherd
florida
concurring
opinion
moore
dempsey
petitioner
detention
sentence
death
pursuant
void
judgment
violation
constitution
therefore
entitled
freed
therefrom
judgments
appeals
district
vacated
case
remanded
latter
however
petitioner
still
subject
custody
indictment
filed
state
indiana
circuit
gibson
county
charging
murder
first
degree
may
tried
another
indictment
district
power
habeas
corpus
proceeding
dispose
matter
law
justice
require
predecessors
section
often
delayed
discharge
petitioner
reasonable
time
may
necessary
taken
judgment
rendered
defects
render
discharge
necessary
may
corrected
mahler
eby
therefore
remand
district
enter
orders
appropriate
consistent
opinion
cf
grandsinger
bovey
supp
allow
state
reasonable
time
retry
petitioner
cf
chessman
teets
dowd
cook
tod
waldman
vacated
remanded
footnotes
writs
habeas
corpus
may
granted
district
courts
within
respective
jurisdictions
writ
habeas
corpus
shall
extended
prisoner
unless
custody
violation
constitution
laws
treaties
burns
ind
stat
replacement
provides
pertinent
part
affidavits
change
venue
founded
upon
excitement
prejudice
county
defendant
cases
punishable
death
may
discretion
cases
punishable
death
shall
grant
change
venue
convenient
county
provided
however
one
change
venue
judge
one
change
county
shall
granted
ight
impressions
may
fairly
supposed
yield
testimony
may
offered
may
leave
mind
open
fair
consideration
testimony
constitute
sufficient
objection
juror
strong
deep
impressions
close
mind
testimony
may
offered
opposition
combat
testimony
resist
force
constitute
sufficient
objection
challenges
cause
following
shall
good
causes
challenge
person
called
juror
criminal
trial
second
formed
expressed
opinion
guilt
innocence
defendant
person
called
juror
formed
expressed
opinion
guilt
innocence
defendant
parties
shall
thereupon
proceed
examine
juror
oath
ground
opinion
appears
founded
upon
reading
newspaper
statements
communications
comments
reports
upon
rumors
hearsay
upon
conversation
witnesses
transaction
reading
reports
testimony
hearing
testify
juror
oath
feels
able
notwithstanding
opinion
render
impartial
verdict
upon
law
evidence
satisfied
impartial
render
verdict
may
discretion
admit
competent
serve
case
burns
ind
stat
replacement
course
agree
opinion
unfortunately
isolated
case
happened
evansville
indiana
atypical
miscarriage
justice
due
anticipatory
trial
newspapers
instead
trial
jury
one
student
society
expressed
view
least
significant
test
quality
civilization
treatment
charged
crime
particularly
offenses
arouse
passions
community
one
rightful
boasts
western
civilization
state
burden
establishing
guilt
solely
basis
evidence
produced
circumstances
assuring
accused
safeguards
fair
procedure
rudimentary
conditions
determining
guilt
inevitably
wanting
jury
sit
judgment
fellow
human
comes
task
mind
ineradicably
poisoned
fallible
men
women
reach
disinterested
verdict
based
exclusively
heard
entered
jury
box
minds
saturated
press
radio
months
preceding
matter
designed
establish
guilt
accused
conviction
secured
obviously
constitutes
denial
due
process
law
rudimentary
conception
term
passes
without
importuned
review
convictions
throughout
country
substantial
claims
made
jury
trial
distorted
inflammatory
newspaper
accounts
often
case
prosecutor
collaboration
exerting
pressures
upon
potential
jurors
trial
even
course
trial
thereby
making
extremely
difficult
impossible
secure
jury
capable
taking
free
prepossessions
evidence
submitted
open
indeed
extraneous
influences
violation
decencies
guaranteed
constitution
sometimes
powerful
accused
forced
practical
matter
forego
trial
jury
see
maryland
baltimore
radio
show
one
reason
another
undertake
review
envenomed
state
prosecutions
disregard
fundamental
fairness
flagrant
compelled
week
ago
reverse
conviction
prejudicial
newspaper
intrusion
poisoned
outcome
janko
ante
see
marshall
see
also
stroble
california
dissenting
opinion
shepherd
florida
concurring
opinion
yet
decided
fair
administration
criminal
justice
must
subordinated
another
safeguard
constitutional
system
freedom
press
properly
conceived
yet
decided
convictions
must
reversed
miscarriages
justice
result
minds
jurors
potential
jurors
poisoned
poisoner
constitutionally
protected
plying
trade