sullivan
little
hunting
park
argued
october
decided
december
little
hunting
park
virginia
nonstock
corporation
operating
playground
facilities
community
park
residents
area
fairfax
county
virginia
membership
share
entitles
shareholder
family
use
facilities
bylaws
rents
house
may
assign
share
tenant
subject
approval
board
directors
facilities
open
white
persons
geographic
area
petitioner
sullivan
owned
lived
house
area
leased
petitioner
freeman
another
house
sullivan
owned
therein
assigned
freeman
membership
share
board
refused
approval
assignment
freeman
negro
thereafter
expelled
sullivan
corporation
protesting
action
petitioners
sued
injunctive
relief
monetary
damages
trial
concluding
little
hunting
park
private
social
club
dismissed
complaints
appeals
virginia
denied
appeals
ground
perfected
provided
law
opposing
counsel
given
reasonable
notice
opportunity
required
procedural
rule
examine
correct
transcripts
opposing
counsel
given
three
days
notice
purpose
complained
period
unreasonable
granted
certiorari
vacated
judgments
remanded
case
appeals
consideration
light
jones
mayer
rejected
appeals
basis
previous
position
lacked
jurisdiction
petitioners
failure
comply
procedural
rule
granted
certiorari
freeman
longer
resides
area
served
little
hunting
park
claim
confined
damages
held
notice
rule
discretionary
jurisdictional
consistently
applied
virginia
highest
deprive
jurisdiction
entertain
federal
claim
presented
bar
review
case
certiorari
pp
petitioner
sullivan
membership
share
little
hunting
park
clearly
private
social
club
integral
part
lease
respondents
racially
discriminatory
refusal
approve
assignment
freeman
constituted
violation
cf
jones
mayer
supra
right
lease
protected
provision
action
third
parties
well
action
lessor
pp
sullivan
standing
maintain
action
effective
adversary
freeman
behalf
barrows
jackson
public
accommodations
provision
civil
rights
act
affect
coverage
see
jones
mayer
supra
pp
state
power
grant
general
injunctive
relief
includes
power
protect
federal
right
involved
petitioners
entitled
compensatory
damages
violation
rights
though
damages
measured
federal
standards
federal
state
rules
damages
may
used
pp
provisions
title
viii
civil
rights
act
enacted
long
petitioners
brought
suits
foreclose
relief
allison
brown
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
peter
ames
eveleth
robert
alexander
jack
greenberg
james
nabrit
iii
john
charles
harris
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondents
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
solicitor
general
griswold
assistant
attorney
general
leonard
louis
claiborne
peter
strauss
joseph
connolly
arnold
forster
sol
rabkin
melvin
wulf
edwin
lukas
samuel
rabinove
paul
hartman
league
et
al
opinion
justice
douglas
announced
justice
black
case
involves
alleged
discrimination
negro
family
use
certain
community
facilities
virginia
trial
dismissed
petitioners
complaints
appeals
virginia
denied
appeals
saying
perfected
manner
provided
law
opposing
counsel
given
reasonable
written
notice
time
place
tendering
transcript
reasonable
opportunity
examine
original
true
copy
rule
case
came
granted
petition
certiorari
vacated
judgments
remanded
case
appeals
consideration
light
jones
mayer
remand
appeals
restated
prior
position
stating
jurisdiction
cases
jurisdiction
adhere
orders
refusing
appeals
cases
brought
case
second
time
petition
certiorari
case
counsel
petitioners
june
gave
oral
notice
counsel
respondents
submitting
transcripts
trial
judge
wrote
counsel
respondents
day
effect
saying
submitting
transcripts
trial
judge
day
filing
motions
correct
asking
trial
defer
signing
period
allow
counsel
respondents
time
consent
motions
otherwise
disposed
judge
absent
chambers
june
ruled
received
transcripts
june
motions
correct
came
hearing
june
time
judge
ruled
act
motions
counsel
respondents
agreed
disagreed
changes
requested
examining
transcripts
june
june
counsel
respondents
told
counsel
petitioners
objections
corrections
entry
orders
granting
motions
correct
counsel
respondents
signed
proposed
orders
counsel
petitioners
prepared
proposed
orders
submitted
trial
judge
june
day
signed
transcripts
corrected
read
cases
appeals
stated
controlling
principle
following
language
requirement
opposing
counsel
reasonable
opportunity
examine
transcript
sets
purpose
reasonable
notice
receipt
notice
opposing
counsel
afforded
reasonable
opportunity
examine
transcript
make
objections
thereto
signed
trial
judge
object
reasonable
notice
attained
bacigalupo
fleming
petitioners
counsel
urge
suggest
virginia
appeals
fashioned
novel
procedural
requirement
first
time
case
cf
naacp
alabama
past
decisions
state
refute
notion
see
bacigalupo
fleming
supra
bolin
laderberg
cook
virginia
holsum
bakeries
decisions
enable
us
say
virginia
consistently
applied
notice
requirement
amount
power
entertain
federal
claim
presented
appeals
desires
see
henry
mississippi
black
dissenting
rule
properly
deemed
discretionary
jurisdictional
bar
review
certiorari
ii
sullivan
freeman
sued
injunctions
monetary
damages
since
freeman
longer
resides
area
served
little
hunting
park
claim
limited
solely
damages
trial
denied
relief
petitioner
reverse
judgments
jones
mayer
reviewed
length
legislative
history
concluded
reaches
beyond
state
action
operates
upon
unofficial
acts
private
individuals
authorized
enabling
clause
thirteenth
amendment
said
negro
citizens
north
south
saw
thirteenth
amendment
promise
freedom
freedom
go
come
pleasure
buy
sell
please
left
mere
paper
guarantee
congress
powerless
assure
dollar
hands
negro
purchase
thing
dollar
hands
white
man
least
freedom
congress
empowered
secure
thirteenth
amendment
includes
freedom
buy
whatever
white
man
buy
right
live
wherever
white
man
live
congress
say
free
man
means
least
much
thirteenth
amendment
made
promise
nation
keep
jones
mayer
complaint
charged
refusal
sell
petitioner
home
black
instant
case
interest
conveyed
leasehold
realty
coupled
membership
share
nonprofit
company
organized
offer
recreational
facilities
owners
lessees
real
property
residential
area
material
whether
membership
share
considered
realty
personal
property
covers
section
covers
right
inherit
purchase
lease
sell
hold
convey
real
personal
property
suggestion
transfer
books
corporation
freeman
share
covered
verbs
suggestion
without
merit
never
doubt
freeman
paid
part
monthly
rental
assignment
membership
share
little
hunting
park
transaction
clearly
fell
within
lease
right
lease
protected
actions
third
parties
well
actions
immediate
lessor
respondents
actions
refusing
approve
assignment
membership
share
case
clearly
interference
freeman
right
lease
narrow
construction
language
quite
inconsistent
broad
sweeping
nature
protection
meant
afforded
civil
rights
act
stat
derived
see
turn
sullivan
expulsion
advocacy
freeman
cause
sanction
backed
state
judgment
imposed
sullivan
punished
trying
vindicate
rights
minorities
protected
sanction
give
impetus
perpetuation
racial
restrictions
property
said
barrows
jackson
white
owner
times
effective
adversary
unlawful
restrictive
covenant
terms
decision
barrows
question
sullivan
standing
maintain
action
noted
jones
mayer
fair
housing
title
civil
rights
act
stat
way
impaired
sanction
said
adequate
dispose
suggestion
public
accommodations
provision
civil
rights
act
stat
way
supersedes
provisions
act
hierarchy
administrative
machinery
provided
act
war
survival
principles
embodied
moreover
saving
clause
act
respects
right
based
federal
law
inconsistent
act
section
derived
act
plainly
inconsistent
act
construed
every
mode
protecting
federal
right
granting
immunity
long
subject
federal
law
johnson
held
jones
mayer
although
couched
declaratory
terms
provides
explicit
method
enforcement
federal
power
fashion
effective
equitable
remedy
federal
remedy
protection
federal
right
available
state
empowered
grant
injunctive
relief
generally
virginia
code
ann
repl
finally
damages
congress
created
federal
jurisdiction
damages
equitable
relief
act
congress
providing
protection
civil
rights
reserved
jones
mayer
question
damages
might
appropriately
recovered
violation
like
problem
bell
hood
suit
brought
federal
officers
alleged
violations
fourth
fifth
amendments
federal
statute
terms
least
provide
remedy
said
federally
protected
rights
invaded
rule
beginning
courts
alert
adjust
remedies
grant
necessary
relief
also
well
settled
legal
rights
invaded
federal
statute
provides
general
right
sue
invasion
federal
courts
may
use
available
remedy
make
good
wrong
done
disregard
command
statute
wrongful
act
results
damage
one
class
whose
especial
benefit
statute
enacted
right
recover
damages
party
default
implied
jurisdiction
civil
matters
conferred
district
courts
provisions
chapter
title
protection
persons
civil
rights
vindication
shall
exercised
enforced
conformity
laws
far
laws
suitable
carry
effect
cases
adapted
object
deficient
provisions
necessary
furnish
suitable
remedies
punish
offenses
law
common
law
modified
changed
constitution
statutes
state
wherein
jurisdiction
civil
criminal
cause
held
far
inconsistent
constitution
laws
shall
extended
govern
said
courts
trial
disposition
cause
suggested
party
dissent
relief
await
proceedings
fair
housing
provisions
title
viii
civil
rights
act
stat
et
seq
supp
iv
petitioners
suits
commenced
march
two
years
act
passed
irresponsible
judicial
administration
dismiss
suit
intervening
act
possible
application
events
long
preceding
enactment
reversed
footnotes
bolin
laderberg
appellants
counsel
delivered
transcript
appellees
counsel
november
transcript
tendered
trial
judge
november
signed
december
appellees
moved
dismiss
appeal
ground
given
reasonable
notice
opportunity
rule
stated
motion
overruled
ground
rule
provides
signature
judge
without
deemed
certification
counsel
required
notice
opportunity
transcript
authentic
noted
judge
signature
appears
transcript
without
therefore
certification
counsel
appellees
required
notice
tendering
transcript
required
opportunity
examine
cook
virginia
holsum
bakeries
notice
transcript
tendered
trial
judge
october
given
counsel
appellee
october
appellant
counsel
however
obtain
copy
transcript
october
conference
held
date
counsel
parties
went
transcript
agreed
certain
corrections
additions
hearing
october
appellee
counsel
claimed
given
reasonable
notice
opportunity
required
rule
suggested
numerous
changes
trial
judge
ordered
transcript
altered
reflect
changes
revised
transcript
tendered
trial
judge
next
day
october
signed
day
appeal
appellee
moved
dismiss
ground
rule
requirements
satisfied
virginia
appeals
overruled
motion
stating
narrative
amended
meet
suggested
changes
counsel
appellee
conceded
oral
argument
us
statement
signed
trial
judge
correct
provides
citizens
shall
right
every
state
territory
enjoyed
white
citizens
thereof
inherit
purchase
lease
sell
hold
convey
real
personal
property
section
act
july
stat
provides
remedies
provided
title
shall
exclusive
means
enforcing
rights
based
title
nothing
title
shall
preclude
individual
state
local
agency
asserting
right
based
federal
state
law
inconsistent
title
including
statute
ordinance
requiring
nondiscrimination
public
establishments
accommodations
pursuing
remedy
civil
criminal
may
available
vindication
enforcement
right
act
fully
effective
december
supp
iv
even
time
apply
house
house
sold
without
services
real
estate
broker
without
notice
described
supp
iv
see
supp
iv
one
knows
whether
new
act
apply
ancient
transactions
even
arose
december
justice
harlan
chief
justice
justice
white
join
dissenting
jones
mayer
decided
section
statute
prohibited
private
racial
discrimination
sale
real
property
construction
old
statute
way
required
language
open
serious
question
light
statute
legislative
history
seemed
unnecessary
unwise
recently
passed
yet
fully
effective
fair
housing
title
civil
rights
act
hereafter
fair
housing
law
today
goes
yet
beyond
jones
implying
private
right
damages
violations
interpreting
prohibit
community
recreation
association
withholding
basis
race
approval
assignment
membership
transferred
incident
lease
real
property
deciding
white
person
expelled
recreation
association
advocacy
negro
cause
standing
maintain
action
relief
fair
housing
law
become
fully
effective
less
three
weeks
think
majority
even
unwise
jones
precipitately
breathing
still
life
vague
congress
provided
modern
statute
containing
various
detailed
remedial
provisions
aimed
eliminating
racial
discrimination
housing
reason
elaborate
part
ii
dismiss
writ
case
improvidently
granted
provide
examples
difficulties
inevitably
encounter
continues
employ
sorts
cases
examine
part
iii
undiscriminating
manner
majority
deals
part
ignores
complexities
involved
giving
sullivan
relief
engrafting
damage
remedy
onto
case
arising
state
first
consider
threshold
question
whether
present
case
adequate
state
ground
bar
review
virginia
appeals
earlier
remand
refused
consider
federal
questions
presented
found
petitioners
failed
give
opposing
counsel
reasonable
written
notice
time
place
tendering
transcript
reasonable
opportunity
examine
original
true
copy
violation
rule
local
rules
majority
suggests
state
procedural
requirement
though
novel
one
fashioned
first
time
case
nevertheless
consistently
applied
amount
power
entertain
federal
claim
majority
goes
conclude
state
procedural
rule
properly
deemed
discretionary
jurisdictional
review
barred
agree
majority
conclusion
adequate
state
ground
shown
find
unable
subscribe
majority
reasoning
appears
unclear
confusing
certain
majority
means
apparent
distinction
rules
deems
discretionary
deems
jurisdictional
perhaps
majority
wishes
suggest
dismissals
petitioners
writs
error
appeals
simply
ad
hoc
discretionary
refusals
accept
plenary
review
lower
decisions
analogous
denial
certiorari
virginia
appeals
done
review
federal
question
properly
raised
course
barred
mere
discretionary
refusal
highest
state
grant
review
lower
decision
provide
adequate
state
ground
circumstances
decision
lower
rather
order
highest
refusing
review
becomes
judgment
highest
state
decision
purposes
jurisdictional
statute
case
clearly
present
kind
discretionary
refusal
state
appellate
accept
review
although
virginia
appeals
may
well
discretion
refuse
review
particular
case
without
giving
reasons
reconciling
refusal
earlier
decisions
dismissal
simply
ad
hoc
exercise
power
review
every
case
presented
instead
state
dismissed
petitions
review
stated
reason
namely
lack
jurisdiction
entertain
appeals
failure
counsel
sullivans
freemans
meet
requirements
rule
state
appellate
refusal
consider
merits
case
based
failure
conform
state
rule
practice
review
barred
unless
able
find
application
state
rule
practice
case
hand
constitute
adequate
state
ground
quite
irrespective
whether
state
appellate
power
refuse
review
reason
majority
might
another
meaning
mind
describes
state
procedural
rule
discretionary
may
suggesting
reasonable
written
notice
reasonable
opportunity
examine
flexible
standards
virginia
appeals
discretion
decide
close
case
either
two
ways
without
creating
obvious
conflict
earlier
decisions
majority
means
discretionary
rule
must
register
disagreement
kind
discretion
nothing
judicial
formulation
law
obligation
reasonably
consistent
explain
decision
including
reason
according
different
treatment
instant
case
surely
state
ground
less
adequate
simply
involves
standard
requires
judgment
reasonable
result
may
turn
close
analysis
facts
particular
case
light
competing
policy
considerations
although
majority
loose
use
word
discretionary
may
suggest
decision
made
pursuant
broad
standard
provide
adequate
state
ground
think
examination
earlier
opinions
virginia
appeals
several
cited
majority
provides
proper
foundation
result
reached
majority
principle
naacp
alabama
finding
virginia
appeals
violation
rule
case
view
based
standard
reasonableness
much
stricter
fairly
extracted
earlier
virginia
cases
applying
rule
predecessor
statute
words
although
rule
may
novel
standard
implicitly
governing
rule
application
facts
think
fair
conclude
light
earlier
decisions
principle
set
forth
bacigalupo
fleming
petitioners
might
justifiably
thought
review
appeals
barred
rule
notwithstanding
snead
commonwealth
one
case
cited
virginia
relied
respondent
yet
somehow
ignored
majority
ovelty
procedural
requirements
permitted
thwart
review
applied
justified
reliance
upon
prior
decisions
seek
vindication
state
courts
federal
rights
naacp
alabama
conclude
decision
rest
adequate
state
ground
ii
petitioners
complain
discrimination
provision
recreation
facilities
ancillary
rented
house
found
one
four
subdivisions
served
little
hunting
park
one
hand
fair
housing
law
provision
explicitly
makes
unlawful
discriminate
person
terms
conditions
privileges
rental
housing
provisions
services
facilities
connection
therewith
race
color
supp
iv
emphasis
added
contrast
majority
jones
noted
deal
specifically
discrimination
provision
services
facilities
connection
sale
rental
dwelling
attempting
deal
problem
discrimination
provision
recreational
facilities
forced
context
vague
statute
decide
transactions
involve
property
purposes
majority
material
whether
membership
share
little
hunting
park
considered
realty
personal
property
covers
examination
opinion
show
majority
failed
explain
membership
share
either
real
personal
property
purposes
majority
complete
failure
articulate
standards
deciding
property
within
meaning
fair
indication
great
difficulties
courts
inevitably
confront
used
remedy
racial
discrimination
housing
lurking
background
grave
constitutional
issues
extended
far
types
private
discrimination
fail
provide
standards
types
transactions
discrimination
unlawful
also
contains
provisions
enforcement
either
public
private
give
construction
statute
effect
imply
remedies
congress
explicitly
provided
injunctive
relief
jones
right
damages
see
part
iii
infra
remedies
expressly
provided
fair
housing
law
variety
techniques
enforcing
prohibition
housing
discrimination
stands
sharp
contrast
first
injured
party
complain
secretary
housing
urban
development
empowered
investigate
complaints
use
informal
methods
conference
conciliation
persuasion
secure
compliance
law
secretary
efforts
prove
unavailing
complainant
go
alternative
going
first
hud
appears
person
may
go
directly
enforce
rights
fair
housing
law
expressly
provides
wide
variety
relief
including
restraining
orders
injunctions
compensatory
damages
punitive
damages
furthermore
act
allows
appoint
counsel
waive
fees
indigent
plaintiffs
award
costs
certain
cases
counsel
fees
successful
plaintiff
addition
actions
initiated
private
parties
attorney
general
empowered
bring
civil
actions
preventive
civil
relief
criminal
actions
punish
force
threat
force
willfully
interfere
intimidate
wish
exercise
aid
others
exercise
rights
fair
housing
law
given
comprehensive
contemporary
statute
limitations
yet
even
established
believe
decide
case
instead
dismiss
writ
certiorari
improvidently
granted
certiorari
jurisdiction
exercised
simply
benefit
particular
litigants
rice
sioux
city
cemetery
instead
settlement
issues
importance
public
distinguished
parties
layne
bowler
western
well
works
even
perspective
parties
case
lost
much
practical
importance
due
fact
freeman
work
taken
family
away
area
served
little
hunting
park
thereby
making
moot
original
claim
injunctive
relief
fundamentally
think
jones
existence
fair
housing
law
renders
decision
case
little
importance
public
although
act
cover
particular
case
negro
future
rent
house
denied
access
ancillary
recreational
facilities
account
race
likelihood
secure
relief
provisions
fair
housing
law
iii
relief
sullivan
majority
opinion
highly
elliptical
circumstances
surrounding
sullivan
expulsion
little
hunting
park
relief
sullivan
sought
state
decision
trial
necessary
begin
analysis
simply
stating
facts
aspects
case
full
examination
record
reveals
first
necessity
remand
majority
premises
also
makes
apparent
majority
failure
provide
guidance
legal
standards
govern
sullivan
right
recovery
remand
awareness
complexity
issues
relevant
sullivan
right
redress
suggests
think
appropriateness
discretionary
denial
review
circumstances
sullivan
expulsion
board
little
hunting
park
refused
approve
assignment
membership
share
sullivan
freeman
sullivan
attempted
convince
board
reverse
decision
end
sullivan
first
met
members
board
protested
actions
subsequently
mobilized
campaign
members
club
persons
community
whole
force
board
reconsider
decision
means
used
campaign
brief
petitioner
sullivan
acknowledges
included
phone
calls
members
board
letters
local
clergy
circulation
among
members
little
hunting
park
petition
called
meeting
full
membership
consider
freeman
case
july
sullivan
received
letter
board
stated
determined
due
cause
warrant
hearing
order
determine
whether
sullivan
expelled
little
hunting
park
pursuant
bylaws
conduct
inimicable
corporation
members
letter
referred
sullivan
board
decision
assignment
membership
tenant
along
continued
harassment
board
members
basis
board
due
cause
determination
board
subsequently
provided
detailed
specification
charges
sullivan
included
inter
alia
allegations
sullivan
instigated
campaign
board
members
harassed
unfriendly
phone
calls
accusing
bigotry
used
abusive
language
phone
call
president
board
written
letters
local
clergy
including
minister
church
employed
president
little
hunting
park
accusing
board
members
participation
real
moral
evil
used
violent
abusive
language
members
little
hunting
park
refused
sign
petition
hearing
charges
board
expelled
sullivan
tendered
current
market
value
two
membership
shares
held
response
actions
sullivan
brought
suit
circuit
fairfax
county
virginia
little
hunting
park
board
seeking
relief
order
compelling
little
hunting
park
reinstate
membership
monetary
damages
amount
injunction
requiring
board
approve
assignment
freeman
forbidding
board
use
race
factor
considering
membership
trial
hearing
disputed
evidence
reasons
sullivan
expulsion
found
defendants
stated
scope
review
board
actions
limited
little
hunting
park
private
social
club
went
find
board
acted
within
powers
conferred
expelling
sullivan
ample
evidence
justify
board
conclusion
complainant
acts
inimicable
corporation
members
corporation
statement
record
mind
several
observations
must
made
majority
treatment
sullivan
rights
first
stating
sullivan
expulsion
advocacy
freeman
cause
majority
surely
taken
resolved
disputed
testimony
decided
facts
underlying
sullivan
expulsion
facts
relevant
sullivan
remedial
rights
surely
must
remand
detailed
findings
seems
unavoidable
majority
premises
second
majority
explained
legal
standard
determine
sullivan
rights
majority
simply
sullivan
standing
maintain
action
without
even
acknowledging
standard
essential
case
ultimately
decided
one
imagine
variety
standards
based
different
legal
conclusions
rights
duties
created
different
remedial
consequences
example
give
sullivan
right
relief
injuries
resulting
little
hunting
park
interference
statutory
duty
freeman
sullivan
duty
freeman
unless
read
impose
duty
sullivan
protest
freeman
exclusion
entitled
reinstatement
standard
board
expelled
simple
act
assigning
share
freeman
alternative
sullivan
might
thought
entitled
relief
injuries
flowed
board
violation
duty
freeman
standard
might
suggest
sullivan
entitled
damages
resulted
little
hunting
park
initial
refusal
accept
assignment
freeman
reinstatement
think
gives
sullivan
right
relief
injuries
result
legitimate
protest
aimed
convincing
board
accept
freeman
protest
activities
legitimate
extreme
standard
give
sullivan
relief
injuries
result
actions
took
protest
board
initial
refusal
irrespective
sullivan
means
protest
standard
require
reinstatement
irrespective
disputed
facts
standard
mean
gave
sullivan
right
regain
membership
even
board
expelled
using
intemperate
abusive
threats
means
protesting
freeman
exclusion
state
remedies
federal
rights
case
arises
state
presents
special
problems
majority
overlooks
suggests
undesirability
deciding
case
context
ancient
statute
deciding
right
recover
damages
case
majority
overlooks
complications
involved
dint
fact
state
asked
provide
remedy
federal
right
bottomed
federal
statute
remedial
provisions
implied
remedies
federal
rights
sometimes
solely
matter
federal
law
times
dependent
either
wholly
partially
upon
state
law
difficult
complex
questions
involved
determining
remedies
state
must
must
provide
cases
involving
federal
rights
noted
majority
opinion
though
perhaps
deciding
little
adds
confusion
already
existing
area
section
title
majority
apparently
thinks
decides
case
concerned
remedial
powers
federal
district
courts
provides
federal
courts
shall
look
state
law
find
appropriate
remedies
applicable
federal
civil
rights
law
deficient
provisions
necessary
furnish
suitable
remedies
majority
turns
provision
head
suggesting
creates
federal
remedy
apart
state
law
remedial
provisions
civil
rights
statute
like
deficient
somehow
imposes
federal
remedy
says
anything
relevant
case
suggests
cases
appropriate
cure
remedial
deficiencies
federal
civil
rights
statute
implication
done
looking
state
law
see
remedies
consistent
federal
policies
available
reason
considerations
many
hardly
foreseen
time
certiorari
granted
dismiss
writ
case
improvidently
granted
dissenting
opinion
dissenting
opinion
see
casper
jones
mayer
clio
bemused
confused
muse
sup
rev
term
harv
rev
civil
rights
act
tit
viii
et
seq
supp
iv
third
final
stage
expansion
coverage
fair
housing
law
takes
effect
december
see
supp
iv
see
majority
opinion
ante
text
rule
see
pipe
line
calvert
appears
plenary
review
virginia
appeals
matter
right
many
kinds
cases
see
code
ann
repl
vol
const
see
hammerstein
superior
chesapeake
ohio
mcdonald
newman
gates
sandalow
henry
mississippi
adequate
state
ground
proposals
revised
doctrine
sup
rev
see
discussion
justice
black
dissent
henry
mississippi
cited
majority
williams
georgia
cited
majority
view
support
reasoning
majority
think
result
williams
rests
upon
determination
inconsistency
application
state
procedural
requirements
new
trial
see
bolin
laderberg
cook
virginia
holsum
bakeries
taylor
wood
bacigalupo
fleming
stokely
owens
grimes
crouch
seen
passage
quoted
majority
see
ante
bacigalupo
interpreted
rule
requiring
opposing
counsel
must
reasonable
opportunity
examine
transcript
receives
notice
based
examination
opposing
counsel
must
reasonable
opportunity
make
objections
accuracy
transcript
transcript
signed
trial
judge
case
opposing
counsel
received
notice
telephone
friday
june
letter
following
monday
opportunity
examine
transcript
consisted
time
monday
friday
transcript
available
judge
chambers
time
friday
june
monday
actually
possession
copy
transcript
argument
length
time
per
se
reasonable
opportunity
belied
cook
virginia
holsum
bakeries
supra
opposing
counsel
received
copy
narrative
two
days
trial
judge
signed
virginia
appeals
found
violation
rule
snead
virginia
appeals
said
important
time
given
opposing
counsel
reasonable
opportunity
analyze
statements
characterized
defendant
counsel
confusing
entire
testimony
material
witness
left
narrative
statement
presented
trial
judge
necessary
insert
opinion
notice
delivered
commonwealth
attorney
residence
office
hours
thirty
minutes
tendering
narrative
statement
evidence
trial
judge
signature
constitute
reasonable
notice
within
plain
meaning
rule
terms
rule
mandatory
jurisdictional
case
far
different
snead
significant
respects
first
snead
confronted
transcript
instead
narrative
narrative
admission
appellant
counsel
confusing
nature
character
case
hand
record
fails
show
counsel
respondent
made
objection
trial
judge
adequacy
notice
accuracy
transcript
see
taylor
wood
supra
stokely
owens
supra
furthermore
oral
argument
counsel
respondent
point
single
inaccuracy
transcript
signed
trial
judge
tr
oral
arg
second
snead
opposing
counsel
given
hour
notice
proposed
tender
judge
signature
night
case
although
transcript
sent
judge
time
opposing
counsel
received
notice
notice
stated
judge
asked
sign
transcript
week
counsel
first
opportunity
examine
respondent
suggests
rule
requires
opposing
counsel
notice
opportunity
examine
transcript
transcript
given
judge
rather
simply
judge
signs
prior
virginia
case
made
aware
stated
however
principle
bacigalupo
quoted
majority
suggests
key
opportunity
inspect
make
objections
judge
signs
transcript
see
civil
rights
cases
supp
iv
see
fair
housing
law
federal
civil
rights
laws
executive
orders
relating
programs
department
housing
urban
development
dept
housing
urban
development
office
equal
opportunity
note
discrimination
employment
housing
private
enforcement
provisions
civil
rights
acts
harv
rev
supp
iv
see
cf
bickel
foreword
passive
virtues
term
harv
rev
given
market
price
membership
share
little
hunting
park
apparently
ranged
time
question
see
government
amicus
brief
freeman
compensatory
damages
probability
substantial
point
next
section
unresolved
factual
issues
may
bar
relief
sullivan
relevant
events
case
took
place
long
fair
housing
law
first
went
effect
april
whether
fair
housing
law
protect
freeman
like
events
take
place
december
part
depend
upon
whether
transaction
sullivan
freeman
fall
within
categories
described
infra
facts
appear
record
exemption
found
supp
iv
appear
bar
recovery
addition
covering
houses
owned
private
individuals
houses
owned
private
individual
owns
three
houses
fair
housing
law
december
covers
rental
homes
rented
help
real
estate
broker
offered
rental
written
notice
advertisement
discriminatory
see
supp
iv
see
petitioners
brief
see
appendix
detailed
specification
charges
sullivan
given
little
hunting
park
part
settlement
suit
brought
sullivan
enjoin
hearing
expulsion
earlier
suit
dismissed
agreement
parties
brought
sullivan
vagueness
july
letter
conduct
upon
hearing
held
settlement
earlier
suit
also
included
stipulation
sullivan
little
hunting
park
future
lawsuits
respondents
claimed
barred
sullivan
suit
us
aspect
stipulation
noted
passed
trial
judge
barrows
jackson
upon
majority
appears
place
heavy
reliance
gives
guidance
extent
state
obliged
allow
white
person
recover
affirmatively
either
damages
relief
transferred
real
estate
interest
negro
barrows
held
damages
awarded
white
defendant
sued
breach
racially
restrictive
covenant
see
case
borak
see
ward
love
county
tungus
skovgaard
testa
katt
state
obligated
give
treble
damages
required
federal
statute
violation
emergency
price
control
act
see
avco
aero
lodge
decide
whether
remedies
available
state
suit
enjoin
strike
limited
remedies
available
federal
law
see
hart
wechsler
federal
courts
federal
system
greene
hybrid
state
law
federal
courts
harv
rev
majority
penultimate
paragraph
appears
decide
whether
rule
damages
drawn
federal
state
sources