state
la
ex
rel
francis
resweber
argued
november
decided
january
rehearing
denied
see
skelly
wright
new
orleans
petitioner
michael
culligan
new
orleans
pecot
franklin
respondents
justice
reed
announced
judgment
opinion
chief
justice
justice
black
justice
jackson
join
writ
certiorari
brings
unique
situation
petitioner
willie
francis
colored
citizen
louisiana
duly
convicted
murder
september
sentenced
electrocuted
crime
upon
proper
death
warrant
francis
prepared
execution
may
pursuant
warrant
placed
official
electric
chair
state
louisiana
presence
authorized
witnesses
executioner
threw
switch
presumably
mechanical
difficulty
death
result
thereupon
removed
chair
returned
prison
new
death
warrant
issued
governor
louisiana
fixing
execution
may
applications
state
filed
writs
certiorari
mandamus
prohibition
habeas
corpus
directed
appropriate
officials
state
execution
sentence
stayed
applications
petitioner
claimed
protection
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
ground
execution
circumstances
detailed
deny
due
process
double
jeopardy
provision
fifth
amendment
cruel
unusual
punishment
provision
eighth
amendment
federal
constitutional
protections
petitioner
claimed
denied
gone
difficult
preparation
execution
received
body
current
electricity
intended
cause
death
louisiana
denied
applications
ground
lack
basis
judicial
relief
state
concluded
violation
state
national
law
alleged
various
applications
spoke
fact
sufficient
intensity
cause
death
passed
petitioner
body
referred
specifically
fact
applications
petitioner
invoked
provisions
louisiana
constitution
cruel
inhuman
punishments
putting
one
jeopardy
life
liberty
twice
offense
granted
certiorari
petition
setting
forth
aforementioned
contentions
consider
alleged
violations
rights
federal
constitution
unusual
circumstances
case
state
louisiana
ex
rel
francis
resweber
matters
state
law
ion
order
louisiana
binding
hebert
state
louisiana
far
aware
case
without
precedent
determine
whether
execution
petitioner
may
fairly
take
place
experience
passed
shall
examine
circumstances
assumption
without
deciding
violation
principles
fifth
eighth
amendments
double
jeopardy
cruel
unusual
punishment
violative
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
nothing
brought
attention
suggest
contrary
must
assume
state
officials
carried
duties
death
warrant
careful
humane
manner
accidents
happen
man
blame
turn
question
whether
proposed
enforcement
criminal
law
state
offensive
constitutional
requirements
reference
made
first
minds
rebel
permitting
sovereignty
punish
accused
twice
offense
ex
parte
lange
wall
bradley
compare
lanza
accused
successfully
seeks
review
conviction
double
jeopardy
upon
new
trial
ball
see
people
trezza
even
state
obtains
new
trial
conviction
errors
accused
may
placed
trial
second
time
sort
hardship
ac
used
forbidden
fourteenth
amendment
palko
state
connecticut
supra
page
page
prosecution
state
law
far
double
jeopardy
concerned
palko
case
decisive
see
difference
constitutional
point
view
new
trial
error
law
instance
state
results
death
sentence
instead
imprisonment
life
execution
follows
failure
equipment
accident
suggestion
malevolence
prevents
consummation
sentence
state
subsequent
course
administration
criminal
law
affected
account
requirement
due
process
fourteenth
amendment
find
double
jeopardy
said
amount
denial
federal
due
process
proposed
execution
second
find
nothing
took
place
amounts
cruel
unusual
punishment
constitutional
sense
case
us
call
examination
punishments
except
death
see
weems
traditional
humanity
modern
law
forbids
infliction
unnecessary
pain
execution
death
sentence
prohibition
wanton
infliction
pain
come
law
bill
rights
identical
words
appear
eighth
amendment
fourteenth
prohibit
due
process
clause
execution
state
cruel
manner
petitioner
suggestion
underwent
psychological
strain
preparation
electrocution
require
undergo
preparation
subjects
lingering
cruel
unusual
punishment
even
fact
petitioner
already
subjected
current
electricity
make
subsequent
execution
cruel
constitutional
sense
execution
cruelty
constitution
protects
convicted
man
cruelty
inherent
method
punishment
necessary
suffering
involved
method
employed
extinguish
life
humanely
fact
unforeseeable
accident
prevented
prompt
consummation
sentence
seems
us
add
element
cruelty
subsequent
execution
purpose
inflict
unnecessary
pain
unnecessary
pain
involved
proposed
execution
situation
unfortunate
victim
accident
though
suffered
identical
amount
mental
anguish
physical
pain
occurrence
example
fire
cell
block
agree
hardship
imposed
upon
petitioner
rises
level
hardship
denounced
denial
due
process
cruelty
third
louisiana
also
rejected
petitioner
contention
death
inflicted
prior
sufferings
deny
equal
protection
laws
guaranteed
fourteenth
amendment
suggestion
far
differs
due
process
argument
based
idea
execution
attempt
execution
failed
severe
punishment
imposed
upon
others
guilty
like
offense
since
others
go
strain
preparation
execution
second
time
experienced
nonlethal
current
prior
attempt
execution
petitioner
compel
petitioner
submit
execution
prior
experiences
denies
equal
protection
equal
protection
protect
prisoner
even
illegal
acts
officers
charge
much
less
accidents
detention
execution
see
lisenba
people
state
california
laws
prevent
accidents
law
equally
protect
long
law
applies
alike
requirements
equal
protection
met
right
assume
louisiana
singled
francis
treatment
generally
applied
fourth
suggestion
brief
original
trial
unfair
petitioner
justify
reversal
judgment
conviction
new
trial
petitioner
claim
brief
inadequately
represented
counsel
record
original
trial
presented
us
shows
warrant
arrest
indictment
appointment
counsel
minute
entries
trial
selection
jury
verdict
sentence
nothing
papers
show
violation
petitioner
constitutional
rights
see
carter
people
state
illinois
review
sought
denial
due
process
law
brought
execution
petitioner
failure
first
effort
electrocute
nothing
us
upon
ruling
predicated
alleged
denial
federal
constitutional
rights
petitioner
trial
record
see
nothing
upon
conclude
constitutional
rights
petitioner
infringed
affirmed
justice
frankfurter
concurring
four
members
find
state
denied
person
due
process
fourteenth
amendment
safeguards
seems
important
explicit
regarding
criteria
state
duty
obedience
constitution
must
judged
particularly
life
stake
july
fourteenth
amendment
ratified
constitution
left
free
carry
notions
criminal
justice
except
insofar
limited
article
constitution
declares
state
shall
pass
bill
attainder
ex
post
facto
law
fourteenth
amendment
placed
specific
restraints
upon
formulation
administration
criminal
law
restricted
freedom
generally
thereafter
privileges
immunities
citizens
person
life
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
person
within
jurisdiction
equal
protection
laws
broad
inexplicit
clauses
constitution
unlike
specific
provisions
first
eight
amendments
formulated
founders
guard
urrence
historic
grievances
broad
clauses
generalities
empty
vagueness
circumscribed
partly
history
partly
problems
government
large
dynamic
though
concerned
immunities
citizens
concern
dual
citizenship
federal
system
safeguards
process
law
equal
protection
laws
summarize
meaning
struggle
freedom
peoples
run
back
magna
carta
contemplate
less
advances
conceptions
justice
freedom
progressive
society
see
classic
language
justice
matthews
hurtado
people
state
california
shortly
adoption
fourteenth
amendment
came
construction
urged
immunities
citizens
abridged
state
privileges
immunities
citizens
theretofore
enjoyed
constitution
view
prevailed
privileges
immunities
clause
fourteenth
amendment
placed
upon
limitations
specific
articles
first
eight
amendments
theretofore
placed
upon
agencies
national
government
fullest
consideration
view
rejected
rejection
authority
comes
contemporaneous
knowledge
purposes
fourteenth
amendment
see
cases
wall
davidson
city
new
orleans
otto
notion
privileges
immunities
clause
fourteenth
amendment
absorbed
called
provisions
bill
rights
limit
federal
government
never
given
countenance
recently
suggested
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
merely
compendious
reference
bill
rights
whereby
restricted
devising
enforcing
penal
code
precisely
federal
government
first
eight
amendments
view
confined
enforcement
criminal
codes
views
safeguarding
rights
individual
deemed
necessary
eighteenth
century
safeguards
perduring
validity
grew
transient
experience
formulated
remedies
time
might
well
improve
fourteenth
amendment
mean
imprison
limited
experience
eighteenth
century
mean
withdraw
right
act
ways
offensive
decent
respect
dignity
man
heedless
freedom
broad
terms
accommodate
freedom
authority
suggested
time
time
may
large
serve
basis
adjudication
allow
much
room
individual
notions
policy
concern
fact
duty
adjudication
basis
less
narrow
committed
impressive
body
decisions
decided
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
expresses
demand
civilized
standards
defined
specifically
enumerated
guarantees
bill
rights
neither
contain
particularities
first
eight
amendments
confined
due
process
law
independent
function
illustrated
numerous
decisions
expounded
opinions
canvassed
matter
thoroughly
see
hurtado
people
state
california
supra
twining
state
new
jersey
snyder
commonwealth
massachusetts
palko
state
connecticut
insofar
due
process
fourteenth
amendment
requires
observe
immunities
valid
federal
government
force
specific
pledges
particular
amendments
found
implicit
concept
ordered
liberty
thus
fourteenth
amendment
become
valid
palko
state
connecticut
supra
pages
page
federal
bill
rights
requires
prosecutions
federal
crimes
initiated
grand
jury
tried
petty
jury
protects
accused
witness
free
consult
conceptions
policy
dispensing
grand
jury
modifying
abolishing
petty
jury
withholding
privilege
see
maxwell
dow
twining
state
new
jersey
supra
snyder
commonwealth
massachusetts
supra
palko
state
connecticut
supra
pages
page
cf
feldman
short
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
withdraw
freedom
state
enforce
notions
fairness
administration
criminal
justice
unless
put
justice
cardozo
offends
principle
justice
rooted
traditions
conscience
people
ranked
fundamental
snyder
commonwealth
massachusetts
supra
page
page
state
may
offend
principle
justice
brutal
subjection
individual
successive
retrials
charge
acquitted
conduct
state
might
denial
due
process
protection
double
jeopardy
federal
prosecution
fifth
amendment
safeguards
limits
state
disputations
engendered
technical
aspects
double
jeopardy
enshrined
fifth
amendment
see
majority
dissenting
opinions
ex
parte
lange
wall
bradley
state
may
found
deny
person
due
process
treating
even
one
guilty
crime
manner
violates
standards
decency
less
universally
accepted
though
treats
mode
opinion
fairly
divided
penological
policy
state
tested
scope
eighth
amendment
involved
controversy
necessarily
evoked
amendment
historic
meaning
unusual
punishment
see
weems
particularly
dissenting
opinion
white
holmes
jj
explicit
stating
problem
us
terms
defined
unbroken
series
decisions
escape
acknowledging
involves
application
standards
fairness
justice
broadly
conceived
application
merely
personal
standards
impersonal
standards
society
alone
judges
organs
law
empowered
enforce
standards
judicial
judgment
narrower
principles
justice
inhere
idea
free
government
holden
hardy
principles
liberty
justice
lie
base
civil
political
institutions
hebert
state
louisiana
implicit
concept
ordered
liberty
palko
state
connecticut
supra
pages
page
great
tolerance
toward
state
conduct
demanded
recently
stated
controlling
principles
see
chief
justice
stone
malinski
new
york
connection
concurring
opinion
case
pages
pages
bring
believe
louisiana
leave
executive
clemency
rather
require
mitigation
sentence
death
duly
pronounced
upon
conviction
murder
first
attempt
carry
innocent
misadventure
offends
principle
justice
traditions
conscience
people
see
snyder
commonwealth
massachusetts
supra
page
page
short
compulsion
principle
must
abstain
interference
state
action
matter
strong
one
personal
feeling
revulsion
state
insistence
pound
flesh
one
must
guard
finding
personal
disapproval
reflection
less
prevailing
condemnation
strongly
drawn
sentiments
expressed
brother
burton
rid
conviction
hold
louisiana
transgress
due
process
clause
state
allowed
precise
circumstances
us
carry
death
sentence
enforcing
private
view
rather
consensus
society
opinion
purposes
due
process
standard
enjoined
constitution
fact
reach
conclusion
mean
hypothetical
situation
assumes
series
abortive
attempts
electrocution
even
single
cruelly
willful
attempt
raise
different
questions
fourteenth
amendment
first
came
application
abstained
venturing
even
tentative
definition
due
process
wise
forethought
indicated
may
found
within
without
due
process
clause
must
inevitably
left
gradual
process
judicial
inclusion
exclusion
cases
presented
decision
shall
require
reasoning
decisions
may
founded
davidson
city
new
orleans
supra
page
otto
page
another
way
saying
matters
depend
degree
whole
law
soon
civilized
holmes
leroy
fibre
chicago
milwaukee
especially
questions
arising
due
process
clause
finding
case
state
louisiana
gone
beyond
powers
starting
point
abstractly
logical
extension
since
say
conscience
mankind
palko
state
connecticut
supra
page
page
louisiana
exercise
power
stands
say
constitution
withholds
justice
burton
justice
douglas
justice
murphy
justice
rutledge
concur
dissenting
circumstances
unique
judicial
history
relator
asks
stay
execution
ground
violate
due
process
law
guaranteed
constitution
believe
unusual
facts
us
require
judgment
louisiana
vacated
cause
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
proceedings
include
determination
certain
material
facts
previously
determined
including
extent
electric
current
applied
relator
attempted
electrocution
may
life
taken
must
avoidable
error
law
uncertainty
fact
relator
execution
ordered
governor
louisiana
take
place
may
proceedings
day
louisiana
said
hours
noon
willie
francis
strapped
electric
chair
attempt
made
electrocute
defect
apparatus
devised
used
electrocutions
contrivance
failed
function
unsuccessful
attempt
electrocute
francis
removed
chair
proceedings
state
brief
says
latent
electrical
defect
attempt
electrocute
francis
failed
state
contending
current
whatsoever
reached
francis
body
relator
contending
current
electricity
pass
body
event
willie
francis
put
death
may
death
warrant
canceled
relator
execution
stayed
pending
completion
proceedings
governor
proposes
issue
another
death
warrant
relator
electrocution
relator
asks
prevent
reason
present
unique
circumstances
electrocution
cruel
unusual
violate
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
constitution
amendment
provides
shall
state
deprive
person
life
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
adopted
long
imbedded
deeply
standards
nation
revulsion
subjecting
guilty
persons
torture
culminating
death
preconstitutional
american
history
reeked
cruel
punishment
extent
eighth
amendment
constitution
expressly
imposed
upon
federal
agencies
mandate
bail
shall
required
excessive
fines
imposed
cruel
unusual
punishments
inflicted
louisiana
many
adopted
like
constitutional
provisions
see
section
article
constitution
louisiana
capital
case
us
presents
instance
violation
constitutional
due
process
clear
presented
many
lesser
punishments
prohibited
eighth
amendment
state
counterparts
taking
human
life
unnecessarily
cruel
means
shocks
fundamental
instincts
civilized
man
possible
constitutional
dure
people
abhorrence
cruelty
ancient
forms
capital
punishment
increased
steadily
today
prohibited
capital
punishment
altogether
unthinkable
state
legislature
modern
times
enact
statute
expressly
authorizing
capital
punishment
repeated
applications
electric
current
separated
intervals
days
hours
finally
death
shall
result
legislature
louisiana
louisiana
say
louisiana
said
merely
pending
petitions
relief
case
presented
executive
rather
judical
question
mistake
law
precluded
discussing
constitutional
issue
us
determining
whether
proposed
procedure
unconstitutional
must
measure
lawful
electrocution
contrast
instantaneous
death
death
electric
shocks
administered
one
intervening
periods
complete
consciousness
victim
electrocution
instantaneous
inflicted
state
conformity
due
process
law
kemmler
louisiana
held
electrocution
manner
prescribed
statute
humane
hanging
state
ex
rel
pierre
jones
la
certiorari
denied
see
also
malloy
state
south
carolina
consideration
execution
shall
instantaneous
substantially
painless
punishment
shall
reduced
nearly
possible
death
electrocution
approved
form
eliminates
suffering
louisiana
statute
makes
clear
provides
sentence
death
imposed
state
shall
electrocution
causing
pass
body
person
convicted
current
electricity
sufficient
intensity
cause
death
application
continuance
current
body
person
convicted
person
dead
la
code
criminal
procedure
act
art
amended
act
provide
electrocution
interrupted
repeated
applications
electric
current
intervals
several
days
even
minutes
provide
application
electric
current
intensity
less
sufficient
cause
death
prescribes
expressly
solely
application
current
sufficient
intensity
cause
death
continuance
application
death
results
prescribing
capital
punishment
construed
strictly
implied
provision
second
third
multiple
application
current
statutory
judicial
precedent
upholding
delayed
process
electrocution
considerations
emphasized
kemmler
supra
early
new
york
statute
authorizing
electrocution
attacked
violative
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
prescribing
cruel
unusual
punishment
upholding
statute
stressed
fact
electric
current
cause
instantaneous
death
like
louisiana
statute
us
statute
called
expressly
continued
application
sufficient
electric
current
cause
death
resulting
death
referred
quoting
new
york
county
courts
quoted
new
york
appeals
people
ex
rel
kemmler
durston
page
page
follows
examined
testimony
find
little
warrant
belief
new
mode
execution
cruel
within
meaning
stitution
though
certainly
unusual
contrary
agree
removes
every
reasonable
doubt
application
electricity
vital
parts
human
body
conditions
manner
contemplated
statute
must
result
instantaneous
consequently
painless
death
italics
supplied
kemmler
supra
pages
page
finally
speaking
said
cruel
involve
torture
lingering
death
punishment
death
cruel
within
meaning
word
used
constitution
implies
something
inhuman
mere
extinguishment
life
italics
supplied
page
page
state
officials
deliberately
intentionally
placed
relator
electric
chair
five
times
time
applied
electric
current
body
manner
sufficient
final
time
kill
form
torture
rival
burning
stake
although
failure
first
attempt
present
case
unintended
reapplication
electric
current
intentional
many
deliberate
intentional
reapplications
electric
current
take
produce
cruel
nusual
unconstitutional
punishment
five
applications
cruel
unusual
one
uniqueness
present
case
demonstrates
today
two
separated
applications
sufficiently
unusual
prohibited
five
attempts
unusual
difficult
draw
line
two
three
four
five
difficult
however
contend
draw
line
one
continuous
application
prescribed
statute
application
current
lack
intent
first
application
less
fatal
material
intent
executioner
lessen
torture
excuse
result
statutory
duty
state
officials
make
sure
failure
procedure
case
contrasts
common
knowledge
precautions
generally
taken
elsewhere
insure
failure
electrocutions
high
standard
care
generally
taken
evidences
significance
properly
attached
unconditional
requirement
single
continued
application
current
death
results
remanding
case
giving
careful
recognition
law
louisiana
neither
legislature
louisiana
expressed
approval
electrocution
one
continuous
application
lethal
current
executive
clemency
provides
common
means
avoiding
unconstitutional
otherwise
questionable
executions
however
unconstitutionality
proposed
executive
procedure
brought
case
apply
constitutional
protection
case
final
recourse
high
trusteeship
vested
people
constitutional
process
lives
may
taken
determining
whether
case
cruel
unusual
punishment
constitutes
violation
due
process
law
case
must
turn
upon
particular
facts
record
case
limited
instance
prisoner
placed
electric
chair
released
subjected
electric
current
presents
case
mental
anguish
however
severe
case
might
petition
louisiana
expressly
current
electricity
caused
pass
body
relator
allegation
nied
answer
evidence
presented
either
side
louisiana
thereupon
undertook
decide
case
pleadings
said
conclusion
complaint
made
relator
matter
courts
authority
inasmuch
proceedings
district
including
pronouncing
sentence
death
entirely
regular
authority
set
aside
sentence
release
relator
sheriff
custody
statement
assumed
relief
sought
louisiana
review
judicial
proceedings
lower
state
courts
prior
passing
sentence
upon
relator
september
contrary
issue
raised
primarily
concerns
action
state
officials
may
connection
past
proposed
attempts
electrocute
relator
issue
properly
presents
federal
constitutional
question
based
impending
deprivation
life
relator
executive
officials
state
louisiana
manner
alleged
violation
due
process
law
guaranteed
fourteenth
amendment
refusal
writs
necessarily
denied
constitutional
protection
prayed
ruling
relator
pleadings
absence
evidence
louisiana
must
taken
acted
upon
allegations
fact
favorable
relator
petition
contains
unequivocal
allegation
official
electrocutioner
switch
current
electricity
caused
pass
body
relator
presence
official
witnesses
allegation
must
read
light
louisiana
statute
authorized
electrocutioner
apply
body
relator
electric
current
intensity
cause
death
record
denial
relief
means
proposed
repeated
least
second
application
relator
electric
current
sufficient
cause
death
present
circumstances
cruel
unusual
punishment
violative
due
process
law
exceeds
punishment
prescribed
law
precedent
cruel
unusual
unlawful
spite
constitutional
issue
thus
raised
louisiana
treated
executive
question
subject
judicial
review
believe
facts
alleged
relator
proposed
action
unconstitutional
believe
also
louisiana
provide
determination
facts
proceed
manner
inconsistent
opinion
counsel
sides
recognize
materiality
occurred
may
demonstrated
affidavits
transcript
testimony
took
available
public
records
called
attention
publication
connection
respective
briefs
excerpts
public
records
printed
margin
indicate
conflict
testimony
resolved
remand
cause
louisiana
manner
indicated
mean
relator
necessarily
entitled
complete
release
means
merely
courts
louisiana
must
examine
facts
actual
nature
punishment
already
inflicted
proposed
inflicted
proposed
punishment
amounts
violation
due
process
law
constitution
state
must
find
means
disposing
case
violate
constitution
reasons
stated
unable
concur
judgment
affirms
judgment
footnotes
fifth
amendment
shall
person
subject
offence
twice
put
jeopardy
life
limb
eighth
amendment
bail
shall
required
excessive
fines
imposed
cruel
unusual
punishments
inflicted
see
twining
state
new
jersey
palko
state
connecticut
kemmler
collins
johnston
see
kepner
cf
ball
said
similar
clause
embodied
constitution
new
york
kemmler
language
question
used
constitution
state
new
york
intended
particularly
operate
upon
legislature
state
whose
control
punishment
crime
almost
wholly
confided
punishment
prescribed
offense
laws
state
manifestly
cruel
unusual
burning
stake
crucifixion
breaking
wheel
like
duty
courts
adjudge
penalties
within
constitutional
prohibition
added
page
page
cruel
involve
torture
lingering
death
punishment
death
cruel
within
meaning
word
used
constitution
implies
something
inhuman
barbarous
mere
extinguishment
life
louisiana
humane
provision
constitution
louisiana
constitution
art
kemmler
case
denied
electrocution
infringed
federal
constitutional
rights
convicted
criminal
sentenced
execution
discussing
pleadings
also
said
latter
answer
opposition
admitted
attempt
made
electrocute
willie
francis
may
obedience
death
warrant
averred
latent
electrical
defect
apparatus
electric
current
reached
body
willie
francis
reason
sentence
death
carried
evidence
course
whether
electric
current
reach
body
willie
francis
important
fact
however
current
sufficient
intensity
cause
death
required
statute
subject
death
warrant
pass
body
willie
francis
means
long
relator
die
apparently
regarded
carrying
death
sentence
purely
executive
function
subject
judicial
review
following
excerpts
copies
affidavits
printed
appendices
brief
behalf
petitioner
official
witnesses
named
persons
charged
statute
duty
making
signed
report
verbal
reciting
manner
date
execution
filed
clerk
sentence
imposed
criminal
procedure
act
art
statements
refer
happened
relator
strapped
electric
chair
hood
placed
eyes
electrocutioner
turned
switch
willie
francis
lips
puffed
groaned
jumped
chair
came
floor
apparently
switch
turned
twice
condemned
man
yelled
let
breath
affidavit
official
witness
harold
resweber
dated
may
saw
electrocutioner
turn
switch
saw
lips
puff
swell
body
tensed
stretched
heard
one
charge
yell
man
outside
juice
saw
willie
francis
dying
one
outside
yelled
back
giving
willie
francis
cried
let
breath
took
hood
eyes
unstrapped
boy
really
got
shock
turned
machine
affidavit
official
witness
ignace
doucet
dated
may
strapped
chair
eriff
martin
parish
asked
anything
say
anything
said
nothing
hood
placed
eyes
officials
charge
electrocution
adjusting
mechanisms
needle
meter
registered
certain
point
dial
electrocutioner
pulled
switch
time
said
willie
moment
willie
francis
lips
puffer
body
squirmed
tensed
jumped
chair
rocked
floor
condemned
man
said
let
breath
switch
turned
men
left
minutes
sheriff
martin
parish
resweber
came
announced
governor
granted
condemned
man
reprieve
affidavit
official
chaplain
reverend
maurice
rousseve
dated
may
attached
brief
behalf
respondents
submitted
copy
transcript
testimony
taken
louisiana
pardon
board
may
support
relator
application
executive
clemency
denied
june
transcript
includes
testimony
charge
electrical
equipment
may
effect
electric
current
reached
body
relator
flesh
show
electrical
burns
also
included
statement
sheriff
neighboring
parish
accompanied
relator
chair
relator
told
leaving
chair
electric
current
public
records
existence
therefore
louisiana
rendered
decision
may