broadrick
oklahoma
argued
march
decided
june
appellants
state
employees
charged
oklahoma
state
personnel
board
actively
engaging
partisan
political
activities
including
solicitation
money
among
coworkers
benefit
superior
alleged
violation
state
merit
system
act
brought
suit
challenging
act
validity
grounds
two
paragraphs
invalid
overbreadth
vagueness
one
paragraph
provides
classified
service
employee
shall
directly
indirectly
solicit
receive
manner
concerned
soliciting
receiving
assessment
contribution
political
organization
candidacy
political
purpose
provides
employee
shall
belong
national
state
local
committee
political
party
officer
member
committee
partisan
political
club
candidate
paid
public
office
take
part
management
affairs
political
party
campaign
except
exercise
right
citizen
privately
express
opinion
vote
district
upheld
provisions
held
section
oklahoma
statute
unconstitutional
face
csc
letter
carriers
ante
pp
statute
gives
adequate
warning
activities
proscribes
sets
forth
explicit
standards
must
apply
impermissibly
vague
pp
although
appellants
contend
statute
reaches
activities
constitutionally
protected
well
clearly
constitutional
applied
conduct
charged
substantially
overbroad
challenge
statute
ground
might
applied
unconstitutionally
others
situations
appellants
conduct
falls
squarely
within
proscriptions
deals
activities
state
ample
power
regulate
public
workers
mitchell
csc
letter
carriers
supra
operation
statute
administratively
confined
clearly
partisan
political
activity
pp
white
delivered
opinion
burger
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
douglas
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
stewart
marshall
joined
post
john
buckingham
argued
cause
appellants
briefs
terry
shipley
mike
martin
assistant
attorney
general
oklahoma
argued
cause
appellees
brief
larry
derryberry
attorney
general
paul
duncan
assistant
attorney
general
justice
white
delivered
opinion
section
oklahoma
merit
system
personnel
administration
act
stat
tit
et
restricts
political
activities
state
classified
civil
servants
much
manner
hatch
act
proscribes
partisan
political
activities
federal
employees
three
employees
oklahoma
corporation
commission
subject
proscriptions
seek
two
paragraphs
declared
unconstitutional
face
enjoined
asserted
vagueness
overbreadth
hearing
district
upheld
provisions
denied
relief
supp
noted
probable
jurisdiction
appeal
appellants
claims
considered
together
federal
counterparts
csc
letter
carriers
ante
affirm
judgment
district
section
enacted
state
first
established
merit
system
personnel
administration
section
serves
roughly
function
analogous
provisions
patterned
hatch
act
without
question
broad
range
political
activities
conduct
proscribed
section
paragraph
six
one
contested
portions
provides
employee
classified
service
shall
directly
indirectly
solicit
receive
manner
concerned
soliciting
receiving
assessment
contribution
political
organization
candidacy
political
purpose
paragraph
seven
challenged
paragraph
provides
employee
shall
member
national
state
local
committee
political
party
officer
member
committee
partisan
political
club
candidate
nomination
election
paid
public
office
paragraph
prohibits
employees
tak
ing
part
management
affairs
political
party
political
campaign
except
exercise
right
citizen
privately
express
opinion
cast
vote
complementary
proscription
challenged
lawsuit
first
paragraph
prohibits
person
way
favored
discriminated
respect
employment
classified
service
political
opinions
affiliations
responsibility
maintaining
enforcing
proscriptions
vested
state
personnel
board
state
personnel
director
appointed
board
violation
results
dismissal
employment
possible
criminal
sanctions
limited
state
employment
ineligibility
stat
tit
appellants
question
oklahoma
right
place
restrictions
partisan
political
conduct
state
employees
appellants
freely
concede
restrictions
serve
valid
important
state
interests
particularly
respect
attracting
greater
numbers
qualified
people
insuring
job
security
free
vicissitudes
elective
process
protecting
political
extortion
see
public
workers
mitchell
rather
appellants
maintain
however
permissible
even
commendable
goals
may
language
unconstitutionally
vague
prohibitions
broad
sweep
failing
distinguish
conduct
may
proscribed
conduct
must
permitted
reasons
appellants
assert
sixth
seventh
paragraphs
void
toto
enforced
anyone
else
held
today
hatch
act
impermissibly
vague
csc
letter
carriers
ante
little
doubt
similarly
vague
men
common
intelligence
must
necessarily
guess
meaning
connally
general
construction
see
grayned
city
rockford
colten
kentucky
cameron
johnson
whatever
problems
frivolous
suggest
section
fails
give
adequate
warning
activities
proscribes
fails
set
explicit
standards
must
apply
grayned
city
rockford
supra
plainest
language
prohibits
state
classified
employee
officer
member
partisan
political
club
candidate
paid
public
office
forbids
solicitation
contributions
political
organization
candidacy
political
purpose
taking
part
management
affairs
political
party
political
campaign
words
inevitably
contain
germs
uncertainty
hatch
act
may
disputes
meaning
terms
partisan
take
part
affairs
political
parties
said
letter
carriers
ante
applicable
limitations
english
language
respect
specific
manageably
brief
seems
us
although
prohibitions
may
satisfy
intent
finding
fault
cost
set
terms
ordinary
person
exercising
ordinary
common
sense
sufficiently
understand
comply
without
sacrifice
public
interest
moreover
even
outermost
boundaries
may
imprecise
uncertainty
little
relevance
appellants
conduct
falls
squarely
within
hard
core
statute
proscriptions
appellants
concede
much
see
dombrowski
pfister
national
dairy
products
williams
robinson
wurzbach
shortly
appellants
commenced
action
district
charged
state
personnel
board
patent
violations
according
board
charges
appellants
actively
participated
campaign
corporation
commissioner
appellants
superior
three
allegedly
asked
corporation
commission
employees
individually
groups
campaign
work
give
referrals
persons
might
help
campaign
requests
made
district
offices
commission
oil
gas
conservation
division
two
appellants
charged
soliciting
money
campaign
commission
employees
one
also
charged
receiving
distributing
campaign
posters
bulk
context
type
obviously
covered
conduct
statement
justice
holmes
particularly
appropriate
difficulty
time
enough
consider
raised
someone
concerns
wurzbach
supra
appellants
assert
construed
applying
allegedly
protected
political
expression
wearing
political
buttons
displaying
bumper
stickers
appellants
engage
activity
charged
actively
engaging
partisan
political
activities
including
solicitation
money
among
coworkers
benefit
superior
appellants
concede
correctly
see
letter
carriers
supra
constitutional
applied
type
conduct
nevertheless
maintain
statute
overbroad
purports
reach
protected
well
unprotected
conduct
must
therefore
struck
face
held
incapable
constitutional
application
believe
overbreadth
doctrine
may
appropriately
invoked
manner
embedded
traditional
rules
governing
constitutional
adjudication
principle
person
statute
may
constitutionally
applied
heard
challenge
statute
ground
may
conceivably
applied
unconstitutionally
others
situations
see
austin
aldermen
wall
supervisors
stanley
hatch
reardon
yazoo
jackson
vinegar
wurzbach
supra
carmichael
southern
coal
coke
raines
closely
related
principle
constitutional
rights
personal
may
asserted
vicariously
see
mcgowan
maryland
principles
rest
fussiness
judges
reflect
conviction
constitutional
system
courts
roving
commissions
assigned
pass
judgment
validity
nation
laws
see
younger
harris
constitutional
judgments
chief
justice
marshall
recognized
justified
necessity
adjudicating
rights
particular
cases
litigants
brought
law
opposition
constitution
law
constitution
apply
particular
case
must
either
decide
case
conformably
law
disregarding
constitution
conformably
constitution
disregarding
law
must
determine
conflicting
rules
governs
case
essence
judicial
duty
marbury
madison
cranch
long
recognized
first
amendment
needs
breathing
space
statutes
attempting
restrict
burden
exercise
first
amendment
rights
must
narrowly
drawn
represent
considered
legislative
judgment
particular
mode
expression
give
way
compelling
needs
society
herndon
lowry
shelton
tucker
grayned
city
rockford
corollary
altered
traditional
rules
standing
permit
first
amendment
area
attacks
overly
broad
statutes
requirement
person
making
attack
demonstrate
conduct
regulated
statute
drawn
requisite
narrow
specificity
dombrowski
pfister
litigants
therefore
permitted
challenge
statute
right
free
expression
violated
judicial
prediction
assumption
statute
existence
may
cause
others
refrain
constitutionally
protected
speech
expression
claims
facial
overbreadth
entertained
cases
involving
statutes
terms
seek
regulate
spoken
words
gooding
wilson
see
cohen
california
street
new
york
brandenburg
ohio
chaplinsky
new
hampshire
cases
judgment
possible
harm
society
permitting
unprotected
speech
go
unpunished
outweighed
possibility
protected
speech
others
may
muted
perceived
grievances
left
fester
possible
inhibitory
effects
overly
broad
statutes
overbreadth
attacks
also
allowed
thought
rights
association
ensnared
statutes
broad
sweep
might
result
burdening
innocent
associations
see
keyishian
board
regents
robel
aptheker
secretary
state
shelton
tucker
supra
facial
overbreadth
claims
also
entertained
statutes
terms
purport
regulate
time
place
manner
expressive
communicative
conduct
see
grayned
city
rockford
supra
cameron
johnson
zwickler
koota
thornhill
alabama
conduct
required
official
approval
laws
delegated
standardless
discretionary
power
local
functionaries
resulting
virtually
unreviewable
prior
restraints
first
amendment
rights
see
shuttlesworth
birmingham
cox
louisiana
kunz
new
york
lovell
griffin
consequence
departure
traditional
rules
standing
first
amendment
area
enforcement
statute
thus
placed
issue
totally
forbidden
unless
limiting
construction
partial
invalidation
narrows
remove
seeming
threat
deterrence
constitutionally
protected
expression
application
overbreadth
doctrine
manner
manifestly
strong
medicine
employed
sparingly
last
resort
facial
overbreadth
invoked
limiting
construction
placed
challenged
statute
see
dombrowski
pfister
cox
new
hampshire
photographs
cf
breard
alexandria
equally
important
overbreadth
claims
entertained
curtailed
invoked
ordinary
criminal
laws
sought
applied
protected
conduct
cantwell
connecticut
jesse
cantwell
jehovah
witness
convicted
breach
peace
playing
phonograph
record
attacking
catholic
church
two
catholic
men
new
street
reversed
judgment
affirming
cantwell
conviction
ground
conduct
considered
light
constitutional
guarantees
punished
common
law
offense
question
omitted
hold
offense
known
breach
peace
must
fall
toto
capable
unconstitutional
applications
fact
seemingly
envisioned
continued
use
great
variety
conduct
destroying
menacing
public
order
tranquility
see
garner
louisiana
harlan
concurring
judgment
similarly
reviewing
statutory
convictions
involved
edwards
south
carolina
cox
louisiana
supra
considered
detail
state
evidence
case
concluded
conduct
issue
punished
statute
basis
judgments
affirming
convictions
reversed
see
also
teamsters
union
vogt
additionally
overbreadth
scrutiny
generally
somewhat
less
rigid
context
statutes
regulating
conduct
shadow
first
amendment
neutral
noncensorial
manner
see
harriss
cio
cf
red
lion
broadcasting
fcc
pickering
board
education
eastern
railroad
conference
noerr
motor
freight
remains
matter
little
difficulty
determine
law
may
properly
held
void
face
summary
action
inappropriate
coates
city
cincinnati
opinion
black
plain
import
cases
least
facial
overbreadth
adjudication
exception
traditional
rules
practice
function
limited
one
outset
attenuates
otherwise
unprotected
behavior
forbids
state
sanction
moves
pure
speech
toward
conduct
conduct
even
expressive
falls
within
scope
otherwise
valid
criminal
laws
reflect
legitimate
state
interests
maintaining
comprehensive
controls
harmful
constitutionally
unprotected
conduct
although
laws
broadly
worded
may
deter
protected
speech
unknown
extent
comes
point
effect
best
prediction
confidence
justify
invalidating
statute
face
prohibiting
state
enforcing
statute
conduct
admittedly
within
power
proscribe
cf
alderman
put
matter
another
way
particularly
conduct
merely
speech
involved
believe
overbreadth
statute
must
real
substantial
well
judged
relation
statute
plainly
legitimate
sweep
view
substantially
overbroad
whatever
overbreadth
may
exist
cured
analysis
fact
situations
sanctions
assertedly
may
applied
unlike
ordinary
statutes
broad
regulatory
acts
directed
terms
political
expression
engaged
private
persons
plainly
protected
first
fourteenth
amendments
time
censorial
statute
directed
particular
groups
viewpoints
cf
keyishian
board
regents
supra
statute
rather
seeks
regulate
political
activity
neutral
manner
indicated
statutes
past
subject
less
exacting
overbreadth
scrutiny
moreover
fact
remains
regulates
substantial
spectrum
conduct
manifestly
subject
state
regulation
public
peace
criminal
trespass
much
established
public
workers
mitchell
unhesitatingly
reaffirmed
today
letter
carriers
supra
decision
letter
carriers
question
valid
least
insofar
forbids
classified
employees
soliciting
contributions
partisan
candidates
political
parties
partisan
political
purposes
becoming
members
national
state
local
committees
political
parties
officers
committee
members
partisan
political
clubs
candidates
paid
public
office
taking
part
management
affairs
political
party
partisan
political
campaign
serving
delegates
alternates
caucuses
conventions
political
parties
addressing
taking
active
part
partisan
political
rallies
meetings
soliciting
votes
assisting
voters
polls
helping
partisan
effort
get
voters
polls
participating
distribution
partisan
campaign
literature
initiating
circulating
partisan
nominating
petitions
riding
caravans
political
party
partisan
political
candidate
proscriptions
taken
directly
contested
paragraphs
rules
state
personnel
board
interpretive
circular
authoritative
opinions
state
attorney
general
without
question
conduct
appellants
charged
falls
squarely
within
proscriptions
appellants
assert
goes
much
farther
prohibitions
according
appellants
statute
prohibitions
tied
tightly
enough
partisan
political
conduct
impermissibly
relegate
employees
expressing
political
views
privately
state
personnel
board
however
construed
explicit
approval
private
political
expression
include
virtually
expression
within
context
active
partisan
political
campaigning
state
attorney
general
plain
terms
interpreted
prohibiting
clearly
partisan
political
activity
surely
expected
ignore
authoritative
pronouncements
determining
breadth
statute
law
students
research
council
wadmond
appellants
point
board
interpretive
rules
purporting
restrict
allegedly
protected
activities
wearing
political
buttons
use
bumper
stickers
may
restrictions
impermissible
may
susceptible
improper
applications
presently
construed
believe
must
discarded
toto
persons
arguably
protected
conduct
may
may
caught
chilled
statute
section
substantially
overbroad
therefore
unconstitutional
face
judgment
district
affirmed
ordered
footnotes
see
code
tit
alaska
stat
rev
stat
ann
merit
system
regulations
merit
system
board
procedures
ark
stat
ann
cal
govt
code
supp
rev
stat
ann
civil
service
rules
regulations
art
xiv
stat
rev
supp
regulations
civil
service
concerning
employees
state
classified
service
del
code
tit
stat
ann
ga
merit
system
personnel
administration
rules
regulations
rule
hawaii
rev
stat
idaho
code
rev
ind
ann
stat
iowa
code
ann
supp
stat
ann
rev
stat
ann
la
art
rev
stat
tit
md
merit
system
rules
agencies
mass
laws
supp
rules
civil
service
stat
ann
miss
merit
system
rules
dept
public
welfare
art
xvi
mo
ann
stat
mont
rev
codes
ann
neb
rev
stat
neb
joint
merit
system
regulations
merit
system
art
xvi
rules
state
personnel
administration
rules
xvi
xiii
rev
stat
ann
stat
ann
stat
ann
supp
civ
serv
law
stat
supp
rules
regulations
merit
systems
art
xvi
ohio
rev
code
ann
rev
stat
stat
tit
supp
laws
ann
merit
system
rules
regulations
civil
defense
council
art
xiv
merit
system
regulations
art
xvi
code
ann
supp
rules
regulations
administering
civil
service
act
tex
penal
code
arts
utah
code
ann
rules
regulations
personnel
administration
supp
rules
administration
va
personnel
act
rule
rev
code
ann
code
ann
stat
ann
wyo
rev
rules
regulations
rule
xiii
compilation
state
rules
regulations
see
commission
political
activity
government
personnel
research
et
seq
see
generally
csc
letter
carriers
ante
brief
appellants
appellants
also
claim
violates
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
singling
classified
service
employees
restrictions
partisan
political
expression
leaving
unclassified
personnel
free
restrictions
contention
somewhat
odd
context
appellants
principal
claim
reaches
far
rather
far
enough
event
legislature
must
leeway
determining
employment
positions
require
restrictions
partisan
political
activities
may
left
unregulated
see
mcgowan
maryland
state
hardly
faulted
attempting
limit
positions
upon
restrictions
placed
sixth
seventh
paragraphs
issue
lawsuit
hereinafter
references
understood
limited
paragraphs
unless
indicate
contrary
significant
respect
note
create
regulatory
maze
uncertain
may
become
hopelessly
lost
see
keyishian
board
regents
rather
state
personnel
board
available
rule
advance
permissibility
particular
conduct
explicit
standards
set
see
tr
rec
see
csc
letter
carriers
ante
tr
oral
arg
district
initially
requested
parties
brief
question
whether
appellants
required
complete
board
proceedings
prior
bringing
action
board
however
appellants
application
ordered
proceedings
stayed
pending
adjudication
federal
constitutional
questions
district
advised
board
decision
absence
objections
appellees
district
proceeded
record
need
consider
whether
appellants
required
proceed
hearing
board
prior
pursuing
action
cf
gibson
berryhill
hart
wechsler
federal
courts
federal
system
ed
state
personnel
board
interpreted
see
merit
system
personnel
administration
rules
board
official
circular
tr
rec
tr
oral
arg
see
generally
hart
wechsler
supra
sedler
standing
assert
constitutional
jus
tertii
yale
note
first
amendment
overbreadth
doctrine
harv
rev
edwards
cox
end
discussions
also
noted
statutes
facially
unconstitutional
overbreadth
see
cox
termed
discussion
additional
reason
reversal
additional
holdings
unnecessary
dispositions
cases
much
one
member
relied
cox
additional
holding
brown
louisiana
involved
convictions
statute
see
brennan
concurring
judgment
brother
brennan
asserts
sense
requirement
substantial
overbreadth
already
implicit
doctrine
post
welcome
observation
perhaps
reduces
differences
differing
views
whether
oklahoma
statute
substantially
overbroad
dissent
also
insists
coates
city
cincinnati
must
taken
overruled
unpersuaded
coates
stands
barrier
rule
invalidate
statutes
overbreadth
flaw
substantial
concern
context
statute
whole
judgment
oklahoma
statute
authoritative
administrative
constructions
accepted
invalid
rule
board
interpretive
circular
tr
rec
right
express
political
opinions
reserved
persons
note
reservation
subject
prohibition
persons
may
take
active
part
political
management
political
campaigns
op
atty
district
similarly
interpreted
intending
permit
public
expressions
political
opinion
long
employee
channel
activity
towards
party
success
supp
although
interpretation
obviously
binding
state
authorities
see
photographs
federal
must
determine
state
statute
means
judge
facial
constitutionality
justice
douglas
dissenting
case
view
governed
considerations
set
forth
dissent
letter
carriers
case
ante
section
par
oklahoma
act
employee
classified
service
shall
member
national
state
local
committee
political
party
officer
member
committee
partisan
political
club
candidate
nomination
election
paid
public
office
shall
take
part
management
affairs
political
party
political
campaign
except
exercise
right
citizen
privately
express
opinion
cast
vote
emphasis
supplied
problem
concerns
commerce
first
amendment
first
amendment
goes
protecting
person
privately
expressing
opinion
public
well
private
discourse
included
emphasis
par
private
expression
views
tolerated
emphasizes
public
expression
tolerated
see
government
deprive
employees
right
speak
write
assemble
petition
office
closed
employee
home
public
discussion
local
state
national
international
affairs
grist
first
amendment
mill
decisions
emphasize
free
debate
uninhibited
discussion
robust
controversy
multitude
tongues
pressure
ideas
clear
across
spectrum
set
pattern
first
amendment
freedoms
emphasized
new
york
times
sullivan
neither
injury
official
reputation
factual
error
justified
repression
speech
demands
free
speech
lowered
barriers
libel
actions
charges
official
misconduct
improprieties
first
amendment
rights
indeed
fundamental
people
sovereigns
sit
seats
mighty
voice
people
ultimately
say
fence
group
bar
public
dialogue
public
interest
loser
tied
federal
regime
either
direct
employment
state
projects
federally
financed
amount
five
half
million
number
included
state
employees
added
estimated
million
people
scrubwomen
janitors
typists
file
clerks
chauffeurs
messengers
nurses
orderlies
policemen
policewomen
night
watchmen
telephone
elevator
operators
well
kind
administrative
executive
judicial
work
activities
touch
first
amendment
rights
banned
illegal
election
procedures
wiretapping
burglary
mailing
politically
salacious
letters
beyond
pale
first
amendment
however
concerns
variety
activities
deep
tradition
forming
ad
hoc
committees
lobby
measures
council
legislative
body
organizing
protective
associations
protect
lakes
rivers
islands
wilderness
neighborhood
preparing
circulating
petitions
signatures
support
legislative
reforms
making
protest
marches
picketing
statehouse
public
cause
well
debate
passing
campaign
literature
watching
polls
making
radio
tv
appearances
addressing
rallies
parks
auditoriums
part
intense
process
mobilizing
people
specific
measures
shaping
public
opinion
getting
rather
elected
bureaucracy
alert
vigilant
alive
efficient
one
quiet
submissive
first
amendment
makes
alert
vigilant
alive
suppression
first
amendment
rights
creates
faceless
nameless
bureaucrats
inert
localities
submissive
master
voice
high
values
ride
today
decision
case
letter
carriers
allow
bureaucracy
state
federal
government
deprived
first
amendment
rights
exercise
certainly
important
public
sector
private
sector
work
government
constitutional
rights
far
first
amendment
goes
keep
plane
people
reverse
judgment
statistical
abstract
pp
justice
brennan
justice
stewart
justice
marshall
join
dissenting
whatever
one
view
desirability
constitutionality
legislative
efforts
restrict
political
activities
government
employees
one
must
regard
today
decision
upholding
oklahoma
merit
system
personnel
administration
act
wholly
unjustified
retreat
fundamental
previously
first
fourteenth
amendment
principles
purposes
decision
assumes
perhaps
even
concedes
statute
issue
sweeps
broadly
barring
speech
conduct
constitutionally
protected
even
standards
announced
public
workers
mitchell
reiterated
today
csc
letter
carriers
ante
nevertheless
rejects
appellants
contention
statute
unconstitutional
face
reasoning
conduct
merely
speech
involved
overbreadth
statute
must
real
substantial
well
judged
relation
statute
plainly
legitimate
sweep
view
substantially
overbroad
whatever
overbreadth
may
exist
cured
analysis
fact
situations
sanctions
assertedly
may
applied
ante
conclusion
finds
support
previous
decisions
effectively
overrules
decision
two
terms
ago
coates
city
cincinnati
remain
convinced
coates
correctly
decided
must
therefore
respectfully
dissent
employees
corporation
commission
state
oklahoma
state
agency
appellants
subject
provisions
state
merit
act
act
designates
certain
state
agencies
including
corporation
commission
barred
dismissing
suspending
classified
employees
political
reasons
time
act
authorizes
state
personnel
board
dismiss
suspend
classified
employee
engages
certain
prohibited
political
activity
although
specifically
protecting
employee
right
citizen
privately
express
opinion
cast
vote
act
bars
fund
raising
political
purpose
membership
national
state
local
committee
political
party
political
club
candidacy
public
office
participation
management
affairs
political
party
political
campaign
result
appellants
alleged
participation
campaign
corporation
commissioner
ray
jones
state
personnel
board
formally
charged
appellants
violations
act
appellants
brought
action
federal
district
western
district
oklahoma
seeking
injunction
enforcement
act
district
rejected
appellants
contentions
act
unconstitutionally
vague
overbroad
today
affirms
determination
appellants
claims
course
similar
vagueness
overbreadth
contentions
rejected
today
upholding
hatch
act
see
letter
carriers
supra
decision
whether
correct
means
controlling
questions
us
certain
fundamental
differences
hatch
act
oklahoma
merit
act
outset
made
clear
section
hatch
act
provides
federal
government
employee
may
use
official
authority
influence
purpose
interfering
affecting
result
election
take
active
part
political
management
political
campaigns
although
recognizing
meaning
act
critical
phrase
active
part
political
management
political
campaigns
hardly
free
ambiguity
concluded
terms
defined
reference
complex
network
civil
service
commission
regulations
developed
many
years
comprehensively
restated
see
cfr
regulations
make
clear
among
rights
retained
federal
employee
notwithstanding
arguably
contrary
language
statute
rights
xpress
opinion
individual
privately
publicly
political
subjects
candidates
isplay
political
picture
sticker
badge
button
member
political
party
political
organization
ake
financial
contribution
political
party
organization
cfr
contrast
critical
phrase
oklahoma
act
employee
shall
take
part
management
affairs
political
party
political
campaign
left
almost
wholly
undefined
act
specifically
declare
employees
right
express
views
privately
nowhere
defines
terms
take
part
management
affairs
reservation
right
express
one
views
private
moreover
thought
mean
public
expression
views
forbidden
course
oklahoma
act
like
federal
counterpart
viewed
conjunction
applicable
administrative
regulations
marked
contrast
elaborate
set
regulations
purporting
define
prohibitions
hatch
act
pertinent
regulations
state
personnel
board
scant
five
rules
shed
light
intended
reach
statute
two
rules
merely
recite
language
act
third
offers
specific
guidance
general
exhortation
classified
employee
shall
pursue
common
good
impartial
act
neither
endanger
impartiality
give
occasion
distrust
impartiality
fourth
provides
classified
employee
must
resign
position
prior
filing
candidate
public
office
seeking
accepting
nomination
election
appointment
official
political
party
merely
tracking
language
act
fifth
rule
far
clarifying
limiting
scope
act
provides
major
thrust
appellants
overbreadth
contention
rule
declares
employee
classified
service
may
wear
political
badge
button
similar
partisan
emblem
may
employee
display
partisan
political
sticker
sign
automobile
operated
control
even
concedes
ban
wearing
buttons
display
bumper
stickers
may
impermissible
ante
possible
course
inherent
ambiguity
oklahoma
statute
might
cured
judicial
construction
terms
oklahoma
never
attempted
construe
act
narrow
apparent
reach
plainly
undertake
task
gooding
wilson
photographs
must
assume
therefore
act
subject
whatever
gloss
provided
administrative
regulations
capable
applications
prohibit
speech
conduct
clearly
protected
first
amendment
even
assumption
statute
regulatory
aim
permissible
manner
state
power
exercised
one
unduly
infringes
protected
freedoms
shelton
tucker
cantwell
connecticut
state
failed
words
provide
necessary
sensitive
tools
carry
separation
legitimate
illegitimate
speech
speiser
randall
see
naacp
button
although
expressly
hold
statute
vague
overbroad
assume
ban
wearing
badges
buttons
may
impermissible
also
act
may
susceptible
improper
applications
ante
principles
thought
established
beyond
dispute
assumption
requires
finding
statute
unconstitutional
face
ordinarily
one
application
statute
constitutional
heard
attack
statute
ground
impliedly
might
also
taken
applying
persons
situations
application
might
unconstitutional
raines
appellants
apparently
concede
state
prohibit
conduct
charged
without
infringing
guarantees
first
amendment
nevertheless
repeatedly
recognized
transcendent
value
society
constitutionally
protected
expression
deemed
justify
allowing
attacks
overly
broad
statutes
requirement
person
making
attack
demonstrate
conduct
regulated
statute
drawn
requisite
narrow
specificity
gooding
wilson
supra
quoting
dombrowski
pfister
adhered
view
guarantees
first
amendment
delicate
vulnerable
well
supremely
precious
society
threat
sanctions
may
deter
exercise
almost
potently
actual
application
sanctions
cf
smith
california
naacp
button
supra
mere
existence
statute
sweeps
broadly
areas
protected
first
amendment
results
continuous
pervasive
restraint
freedom
discussion
might
reasonably
regarded
within
purview
regulations
liberty
free
discussion
concerned
special
reasons
observing
rule
statute
accusation
evidence
prescribes
limits
permissible
conduct
warns
transgression
thornhill
alabama
see
note
first
amendment
overbreadth
doctrine
harv
rev
although
declines
hold
oklahoma
act
unconstitutional
face
expressly
recognize
overbreadth
review
necessary
means
preventing
chilling
effect
protected
expression
nevertheless
reasons
function
doctrine
attenuates
otherwise
unprotected
behavior
forbids
state
sanction
moves
pure
speech
toward
conduct
conduct
even
expressive
falls
within
scope
otherwise
valid
criminal
laws
reflect
legitimate
state
interests
maintaining
comprehensive
controls
harmful
constitutionally
unprotected
conduct
ante
conduct
involved
statute
overbreadth
must
henceforth
substantial
statute
properly
found
invalid
face
accept
validity
analysis
first
place
makes
effort
define
means
substantial
overbreadth
never
held
statute
held
invalid
face
merely
possible
conceive
single
impermissible
application
sense
requirement
substantial
overbreadth
already
implicit
doctrine
cf
note
first
amendment
overbreadth
doctrine
supra
whether
means
require
different
greater
showing
substantiality
left
obscure
today
opinion
large
part
makes
effort
explain
overbreadth
oklahoma
act
real
somehow
quite
substantial
guidance
provided
conclusory
assertion
appellants
showing
falls
line
fundamentally
offers
rationale
explain
conclusion
purposes
overbreadth
analysis
deterrence
conduct
viewed
differently
deterrence
speech
even
equally
protected
first
amendment
indeed
case
us
hard
know
whether
protected
activity
falling
within
act
considered
speech
conduct
case
conclusion
distinction
drawn
premise
justice
white
dissenting
opinion
coates
city
cincinnati
conclusion
although
squarely
rejected
coates
adopted
issue
coates
city
ordinance
making
offense
three
persons
assemble
sidewalks
conduct
manner
annoying
persons
passing
doubt
ordinance
held
unconstitutional
face
merely
unconstitutional
applied
particular
protected
conduct
expressly
noted
ordinance
aimed
directly
activity
protected
constitution
need
lament
us
details
conduct
found
annoying
ordinance
face
sets
standard
conduct
warns
transgression
details
offense
serve
validate
ordinance
details
offense
charged
ordinance
suspending
unconditionally
right
assembly
free
speech
dissent
justice
white
maintained
since
ordinance
prohibited
persons
assembling
conduct
ing
manner
annoying
persons
deal
cincinnati
ordinance
ordinary
criminal
statute
ordinance
clearly
reaches
certain
conduct
may
illegally
vague
respect
conduct
statute
infirm
face
since
information
record
conduct
charged
defendants
position
judge
statute
applied
ordinance
may
confer
wide
discretion
wide
range
circumstances
irrelevant
may
dealing
conduct
core
thus
coates
stood
today
proposition
statute
unconstitutionally
broad
authorizes
punishment
constitutionally
protected
conduct
must
held
invalid
face
whether
person
raising
challenge
prosecuted
properly
narrowed
statute
makes
attempt
distinguish
coates
implicitly
conceding
decision
overruled
stage
obviously
difficult
estimate
probable
impact
today
decision
requirement
substantial
overbreadth
construed
mean
facial
review
inappropriate
likelihood
impermissible
application
statute
small
generate
chilling
effect
protected
speech
conduct
impact
likely
small
hand
today
decision
necessitates
drawing
artificial
distinctions
protected
speech
protected
conduct
chill
protected
conduct
rarely
ever
found
sufficient
require
facial
invalidation
overbroad
statute
effect
grave
indeed
view
principles
set
forth
coates
city
cincinnati
essential
preservation
enforcement
first
amendment
guarantees
since
subsequent
development
persuaded
principles
coates
incorrectly
decided
reverse
judgment
district
strength
decision
hold
oklahoma
merit
act
unconstitutional
face
stat
tit
provides
pertinent
part
employee
classified
service
member
personnel
board
shall
directly
indirectly
solicit
receive
manner
concerned
soliciting
receiving
assessment
subscription
contribution
political
organization
candidacy
political
purpose
state
officer
state
employee
unclassified
service
shall
solicit
receive
assessment
subscription
contribution
employee
classified
service
employee
classified
service
shall
member
national
state
local
committee
political
party
officer
member
committee
partisan
political
club
candidate
nomination
election
paid
public
office
shall
take
part
management
affairs
political
party
political
campaign
except
exercise
right
citizen
privately
express
opinion
cast
vote
oklahoma
merit
system
personnel
administration
rule
provides
employee
classified
service
member
personnel
board
shall
directly
indirectly
solicit
receive
manner
concerned
soliciting
receiving
assessment
subscription
contribution
political
organization
candidacy
political
purpose
state
officer
state
employee
unclassified
service
shall
solicit
receive
assessment
subscription
contribution
employee
classified
service
rule
provides
employee
classified
service
shall
member
national
state
local
committee
political
party
officer
member
committee
partisan
political
club
candidate
nomination
election
paid
public
office
shall
take
part
management
affairs
political
party
political
campaign
except
exercise
right
citizen
privately
express
opinion
cast
vote
compare
supra
rule
provides
every
classified
employee
shall
fulfill
best
ability
duties
office
sic
position
conferred
upon
shall
prove
behavior
inside
outside
worth
esteem
office
position
requires
official
activities
classified
employee
shall
pursue
common
good
impartial
act
neither
endanger
impartiality
give
occasion
distrust
impartiality
classified
employee
shall
engage
employment
activity
enterprise
determined
inconsistent
incompatible
conflict
duties
classified
employee
duties
functions
responsibilities
appointing
authority
employed
appointing
authority
shall
determine
prescribe
activities
employees
jurisdiction
considered
inconsistent
incompatible
conflict
duties
classified
employees
making
determination
appointing
authority
shall
give
consideration
employment
activity
enterprise
involves
use
private
gain
advantage
state
time
facilities
equipment
supplies
badge
uniform
prestige
influence
one
state
office
employment
involves
receipt
acceptance
classified
employee
money
consideration
anyone
state
performance
act
classified
employee
required
expected
render
regular
course
hours
state
employment
part
duties
state
classified
employee
involves
performance
act
capacity
state
classified
employee
act
may
later
subject
directly
indirectly
control
inspection
review
audit
enforcement
classified
employee
agency
employed
classified
employee
shall
hours
duty
subject
laws
rules
regulations
pertain
thereto
devote
full
time
attention
efforts
office
employment
rule
provides
classified
employee
shall
resign
position
prior
filing
candidate
public
office
seeking
accepting
nomination
election
appointment
official
political
party
partisan
political
club
organization
serving
member
committee
group
organization
rule
also
provides
continued
use
display
political
material
shall
deemed
willful
intent
violate
provisions
relating
prohibited
political
activities
classified
state
employees
shall
subject
employee
dismissal
pursuant
said
statute
see
also
niemotko
maryland
frankfurter
concurring
result
related
case
kunz
new
york
formulate
particularity
terms
permit
system
satisfy
fourteenth
amendment
addition
regulations
promulgated
state
personnel
board
places
reliance
interpretive
circular
issued
board
certain
opinions
issued
state
attorney
general
even
assuming
constructions
properly
considered
gauging
reach
act
offer
little
real
guidance
meaning
terms
circular
example
right
express
political
opinions
reserved
persons
note
reservation
subject
prohibition
persons
may
take
active
part
political
management
political
campaigns
see
ante
second
half
statement
merely
restates
provision
act
first
half
hardly
said
convey
fixed
meaning
fact
given
statement
act
right
make
private
expression
political
views
protected
employee
might
reasonably
interpret
circular
mean
right
express
political
opinions
reserved
persons
provided
expression
made
public
similarly
makes
reference
opinion
attorney
general
holding
plain
terms
ante
act
applies
clearly
partisan
political
activity
loss
see
statements
offer
clarification
provisions
act
raines
concerned
prosecution
civil
rights
act
charging
defendants
capacity
state
officials
discriminated
blacks
desired
register
vote
defendants
conduct
plainly
fell
within
permissible
reach
statute
importantly
even
suggested
statute
might
conceivably
used
punish
exercise
first
amendment
rights
stating
general
rule
defendant
normally
may
assert
constitutional
rights
person
party
raines
specifically
recognize
rule
suspended
cases
application
inhibitory
effect
freedom
speech
cf
national
dairy
yazoo
jackson
vinegar
see
also
kunz
new
york
aptheker
secretary
state
terminiello
chicago
applied
overbreadth
review
many
statutes
assertedly
chilling
effect
protected
conduct
rather
pure
speech
see
robel
aptheker
secretary
state
supra
thornhill
alabama
none
cases
others
involving
conduct
rather
speech
suggest
defendant
lack
standing
raise
overbreadth
claim
conduct
proscribed
narrowly
drawn
statute