hoffman
estates
flipside
hoffman
estates
argued
december
decided
march
ordinance
appellant
village
requires
business
obtain
license
sells
items
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
guidelines
define
items
roach
clips
used
smoke
cannabis
pipes
paraphernalia
sale
required
licensed
appellee
sold
variety
merchandise
store
including
roach
clips
specially
designed
pipes
used
smoke
marihuana
upon
notified
possible
violation
ordinance
brought
suit
federal
district
claiming
ordinance
unconstitutionally
vague
overbroad
requesting
injunctive
declaratory
relief
damages
district
upheld
ordinance
awarded
judgment
village
defendants
appeals
reversed
ground
ordinance
unconstitutionally
vague
face
held
ordinance
facially
overbroad
vague
reasonably
clear
application
appellee
pp
facial
challenge
overbreadth
vagueness
enactment
must
first
determine
whether
enactment
reaches
substantial
amount
constitutionally
protected
conduct
overbreadth
challenge
must
fail
examine
facial
vagueness
challenge
uphold
challenge
enactment
impermissibly
vague
applications
pp
ordinance
violate
appellee
first
amendment
rights
overbroad
inhibits
rights
parties
ordinance
restrict
speech
simply
regulates
commercial
marketing
items
labels
reveal
may
used
illicit
purpose
thus
embrace
noncommercial
speech
respect
commercial
speech
interest
implicated
ordinance
restriction
manner
marketing
appreciably
limit
appellee
communication
information
except
extent
directed
commercial
activity
promoting
encouraging
illegal
drug
use
activity
deemed
speech
speech
proposing
illegal
transaction
thus
subject
government
regulation
ban
irrelevant
whether
ordinance
overbroad
scope
encompassing
person
commercial
speech
since
overbreadth
doctrine
apply
commercial
speech
pp
respect
facial
vagueness
challenge
appellee
shown
ordinance
impermissibly
vague
applications
ordinance
language
designed
use
unconstitutionally
vague
face
since
clear
standard
encompasses
least
item
principally
used
illegal
drugs
virtue
objective
features
features
designed
manufacturer
thus
designed
use
standard
sufficiently
clear
cover
least
items
appellee
sold
roach
clips
specially
designed
pipes
marketed
use
standard
guidelines
refer
display
paraphernalia
proximity
covered
items
otherwise
uncovered
items
thus
standard
requires
scienter
part
retailer
test
appellee
ample
warning
marketing
activities
required
license
displaying
certain
magazine
certain
books
dealing
illegal
drugs
physically
close
pipes
colored
rolling
paper
clear
violation
guidelines
selling
roach
clips
pp
ordinance
language
sufficiently
clear
speculative
danger
arbitrary
enforcement
render
void
vagueness
facial
challenge
pp
marshall
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
white
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
post
stevens
took
part
consideration
decision
case
richard
williams
argued
cause
filed
briefs
appellants
michael
pritzker
argued
cause
filed
brief
appellee
ronald
zumbrun
john
findley
filed
brief
community
action
drug
abuse
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
charles
trost
filed
brief
american
businesses
constitutional
rights
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
briefs
amici
curiae
filed
state
arkansas
et
al
steve
clark
attorney
general
arkansas
macfarlane
attorney
general
colorado
carl
ajello
attorney
general
connecticut
richard
gebelein
attorney
general
delaware
jim
smith
attorney
general
florida
mitchell
franks
david
leroy
attorney
general
idaho
linley
pearson
attorney
general
indiana
robert
stephan
attorney
general
kansas
william
guste
attorney
general
louisiana
james
tierney
attorney
general
maine
stephen
sachs
attorney
general
maryland
paul
strain
dennis
sweeney
linda
lamone
assistant
attorneys
general
paul
douglas
attorney
general
nebraska
richard
bryan
attorney
general
nevada
james
zazzali
attorney
general
new
jersey
jeff
bingaman
attorney
general
new
mexico
rufus
edmisten
attorney
general
north
carolina
david
crump
james
wallace
deputy
attorneys
general
jan
eric
cartwright
attorney
general
oklahoma
leroy
zimmerman
attorney
general
pennsylvania
mark
white
attorney
general
texas
david
wilkinson
attorney
general
utah
kenneth
eikenberry
attorney
general
washington
village
wilmette
illinois
robert
mangler
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
case
presents
facial
challenge
drug
paraphernalia
ordinance
ground
unconstitutionally
vague
overbroad
ordinance
question
requires
business
obtain
license
sells
items
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
village
hoffman
estates
ordinance
appeals
seventh
circuit
held
ordinance
vague
face
noted
probable
jurisdiction
reverse
three
years
prior
may
appellee
flipside
hoffman
estates
flipside
sold
variety
merchandise
including
phonographic
records
smoking
accessories
novelty
devices
jewelry
store
located
village
hoffman
estates
village
february
village
enacted
ordinance
regulating
drug
paraphernalia
effective
may
ordinance
makes
unlawful
person
sell
items
effect
paraphernalia
accessory
thing
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
defined
illinois
revised
statutes
without
obtaining
license
therefor
license
fee
business
must
also
file
affidavits
licensee
employees
convicted
offense
moreover
business
must
keep
record
sale
regulated
item
including
name
address
purchaser
open
police
inspection
regulated
item
may
sole
minor
violation
subject
fine
less
day
violation
continues
gives
rise
separate
offense
series
licensing
guidelines
prepared
village
attorney
define
paper
roach
clips
pipes
paraphernalia
sale
required
licensed
administrative
inquiry
village
determined
flipside
one
store
appeared
violation
ordinance
village
attorney
notified
flipside
existence
ordinance
made
copy
ordinance
guidelines
available
flipside
flipside
owner
asked
guidance
concerning
items
covered
ordinance
village
attorney
advised
remove
items
certain
section
store
protection
app
items
included
according
flipside
description
clamp
chain
ornaments
alligator
clip
key
chains
necklaces
earrings
cigarette
holders
glove
stretchers
scales
strainers
pulverizer
squeeze
bottles
pipes
water
pipes
pins
herb
sifter
mirrors
vials
cigarette
rolling
papers
tobacco
snuff
may
instead
applying
license
seeking
clarification
via
administrative
procedures
village
established
licensing
ordinances
flipside
filed
lawsuit
district
northern
district
illinois
complaint
alleged
inter
alia
ordinance
unconstitutionally
vague
overbroad
requested
injunctive
declaratory
relief
damages
district
hearing
testimony
declined
grant
preliminary
injunction
case
tried
without
jury
additional
evidence
stipulated
testimony
issued
opinion
upholding
constitutionality
ordinance
awarded
judgment
village
defendants
supp
appeals
reversed
ground
ordinance
unconstitutionally
vague
face
reviewed
language
ordinance
guidelines
found
vague
respect
certain
conceivable
applications
ordinary
pipes
paper
clips
sold
next
rolling
stone
magazine
also
suggested
subjective
nature
marketing
test
creates
danger
arbitrary
discriminatory
enforcement
alternative
lifestyles
finally
determined
availability
administrative
review
guidelines
cure
defect
thus
concluded
ordinance
impermissibly
vague
face
ii
facial
challenge
overbreadth
vagueness
law
first
task
determine
whether
enactment
reaches
substantial
amount
constitutionally
protected
conduct
overbreadth
challenge
must
fail
examine
facial
vagueness
challenge
assuming
enactment
implicates
constitutionally
protected
conduct
uphold
challenge
enactment
impermissibly
vague
applications
plaintiff
engages
conduct
clearly
proscribed
complain
vagueness
law
applied
conduct
others
therefore
examine
complainant
conduct
analyzing
hypothetical
applications
law
appeals
case
explicitly
consider
whether
ordinance
reaches
constitutionally
protected
conduct
overbroad
whether
ordinance
vague
applications
instead
determined
ordinance
void
vagueness
unclear
applications
conduct
flipside
hypothetical
parties
proper
analysis
however
ordinance
facially
invalid
iii
first
examine
whether
ordinance
infringes
flipside
first
amendment
rights
overbroad
inhibits
first
amendment
rights
parties
flipside
makes
exorbitant
claim
village
imposed
prior
restraint
speech
guidelines
treat
proximity
literature
indicium
paraphernalia
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
flipside
also
argues
presence
designs
logos
slogans
paraphernalia
may
trigger
enforcement
ordinance
infringes
protected
symbolic
speech
brief
appellee
arguments
long
detain
us
first
village
directly
infringed
noncommercial
speech
flipside
parties
ordinance
licenses
regulates
sale
items
displayed
within
proximity
literature
encouraging
illegal
use
cannabis
illegal
drugs
guidelines
supra
prohibit
otherwise
regulate
sale
literature
although
designs
names
cigarette
papers
may
subject
items
regulation
village
restrict
speech
simply
regulates
commercial
marketing
items
labels
reveal
may
used
illicit
purpose
scope
ordinance
therefore
embrace
noncommercial
speech
second
insofar
commercial
speech
interest
implicated
attenuated
interest
displaying
marketing
merchandise
manner
retailer
desires
doubt
village
restriction
manner
marketing
appreciably
limits
flipside
communication
information
one
obvious
telling
exception
ordinance
expressly
directed
commercial
activity
promoting
encouraging
illegal
drug
use
activity
deemed
speech
speech
proposing
illegal
transaction
government
may
regulate
ban
entirely
central
hudson
gas
electric
public
service
pittsburgh
press
human
relations
finally
irrelevant
whether
ordinance
overbroad
scope
encompassing
protected
commercial
speech
persons
overbreadth
doctrine
apply
commercial
speech
central
hudson
supra
iv
law
reach
constitutionally
protected
conduct
therefore
satisfies
overbreadth
test
may
nevertheless
challenged
face
unduly
vague
violation
due
process
succeed
however
complainant
must
demonstrate
law
impermissibly
vague
applications
flipside
makes
showing
standards
evaluating
vagueness
enunciated
grayned
city
rockford
vague
laws
offend
several
important
values
first
assume
man
free
steer
lawful
unlawful
conduct
insist
laws
give
person
ordinary
intelligence
reasonable
opportunity
know
prohibited
may
act
accordingly
vague
laws
may
trap
innocent
providing
fair
warning
second
arbitrary
discriminatory
enforcement
prevented
laws
must
provide
explicit
standards
apply
vague
law
impermissibly
delegates
basic
policy
matters
policemen
judges
juries
resolution
ad
hoc
subjective
basis
attendant
dangers
arbitrary
discriminatory
applications
footnotes
omitted
finally
perhaps
important
factor
affecting
clarity
constitution
demands
law
whether
threatens
inhibit
exercise
constitutionally
protected
rights
example
law
interferes
right
free
speech
association
stringent
vagueness
test
apply
ordinance
simply
regulates
business
behavior
contains
scienter
requirement
respect
alternative
marketed
use
standard
ordinance
nominally
imposes
civil
penalties
however
village
concedes
ordinance
prohibitory
stigmatizing
effect
may
warrant
relatively
strict
test
flipside
facial
challenge
fails
test
appropriate
either
criminal
law
ordinance
sufficiently
clear
applied
flipside
ordinance
requires
flipside
obtain
license
sells
items
effect
paraphernalia
accessory
thing
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
defined
illinois
revised
statutes
flipside
expresses
uncertainty
drugs
description
encompasses
district
noted
illinois
law
clearly
defines
cannabis
numerous
controlled
drugs
including
cocaine
rev
ch
hand
words
items
effect
paraphernalia
accessory
thing
identify
type
merchandise
village
desires
regulate
flipside
challenge
thus
appropriately
focuses
language
designed
marketed
use
either
designed
use
marketed
use
standard
conclude
least
items
sold
flipside
covered
thus
flipside
facial
challenge
unavailing
designed
use
appeals
speculation
meaning
design
largely
unfounded
guidelines
refer
paper
colorful
design
specific
items
conclusively
designed
designed
illegal
use
principal
meaning
design
fashion
according
plan
webster
new
international
dictionary
english
language
ed
cf
lanzetta
new
jersey
therefore
plain
standard
encompasses
least
item
principally
used
illegal
drugs
virtue
objective
features
features
designed
manufacturer
business
person
ordinary
intelligence
understand
term
refers
design
manufacturer
intent
retailer
customer
also
sufficiently
clear
items
principally
used
nondrug
purposes
ordinary
pipes
designed
use
illegal
drugs
moreover
issue
fair
warning
present
case
since
flipside
concedes
phrase
refers
structural
characteristics
item
ordinance
guidelines
contain
ambiguities
nevertheless
designed
use
standard
sufficiently
clear
cover
least
items
flipside
sold
ordinance
guidelines
explicitly
regulates
roach
clips
flipside
admitted
store
sold
items
see
tr
village
chief
police
testified
never
seen
roach
clip
used
purpose
smoke
cannabis
app
chief
also
testified
specially
designed
pipe
flipside
marketed
typically
used
smoke
marihuana
ibid
whether
guidelines
administrative
rules
enforcement
policy
clarify
ambiguous
scope
standard
respects
concern
facial
challenge
marketed
use
test
flipside
ample
warning
marketing
activities
required
license
flipside
displayed
magazine
high
times
books
entitled
marijuana
grower
guide
children
garden
grass
pleasures
cocaine
physically
close
pipes
colored
rolling
papers
clear
violation
guidelines
noted
flipside
admitted
store
sold
roach
clips
principally
used
illegal
purposes
finally
section
store
flipside
posted
sign
must
older
purchase
head
supplies
tr
appeals
also
held
ordinance
provides
insufficient
standards
enforcement
specifically
feared
ordinance
might
used
harass
individuals
alternative
lifestyles
views
reviewing
business
regulation
facial
vagueness
however
principal
inquiry
whether
law
affords
fair
warning
proscribed
moreover
emphasis
almost
inescapable
reviewing
challenge
law
evidence
introduced
indicate
whether
ordinance
enforced
discriminatory
manner
aim
inhibiting
unpopular
speech
language
ordinance
sufficiently
clear
speculative
danger
arbitrary
enforcement
render
ordinance
void
vagueness
cf
papachristou
city
jacksonville
coates
city
cincinnati
suggest
risk
discriminatory
enforcement
insignificant
testimony
village
attorney
drafted
ordinance
village
president
police
chief
revealed
confusion
whether
ordinance
applies
certain
items
well
extensive
reliance
judgment
police
officers
give
meaning
ordinance
enforce
fairly
stage
however
prepared
hold
risk
jeopardizes
entire
ordinance
assume
village
take
steps
minimize
dangers
arbitrary
enforcement
village
may
adopt
administrative
regulations
sufficiently
narrow
potentially
vague
arbitrary
interpretations
ordinance
economic
regulation
especially
administrative
regulation
often
suffice
clarify
standard
otherwise
uncertain
scope
also
find
significant
village
testimony
primarily
relied
marketing
aspect
standard
require
ambiguous
analysis
whether
paraphernalia
designed
illegal
drug
use
therefore
presents
lesser
risk
discriminatory
enforcement
although
possible
specific
future
applications
may
engender
concrete
problems
constitutional
dimension
time
enough
consider
problems
arise
joseph
seagram
sons
hostetter
vi
many
american
communities
recently
enacted
laws
regulating
prohibiting
sale
drug
paraphernalia
determine
whether
laws
wise
effective
course
province
see
ferguson
skrupa
hold
legislation
facially
overbroad
vague
reach
constitutionally
protected
conduct
reasonably
clear
application
complainant
accordingly
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
appendix
opinion
village
hoffman
estates
ordinance
whereas
certain
items
designed
marketed
use
illegal
drugs
retailed
within
village
hoffman
estates
cook
county
illinois
whereas
recognized
items
legal
retail
items
sale
banned
whereas
evidence
items
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
best
interests
health
safety
welfare
citizens
village
hoffman
estates
regulate
within
village
sale
items
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
therefore
ordained
president
board
trustees
village
hoffman
estates
cook
county
illinois
follows
section
hoffman
estates
municipal
code
amended
adding
thereto
additional
section
section
additional
section
shall
read
follows
sec
items
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
license
required
shall
unlawful
person
persons
principal
clerk
agent
servant
sell
items
effect
paraphernalia
accessory
thing
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
defined
illinois
revised
statutes
without
obtaining
license
therefor
licenses
shall
addition
licenses
held
applicant
application
sell
item
effect
paraphernalia
accessory
thing
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
shall
addition
requirements
article
accompanied
affidavits
applicant
every
employee
authorized
sell
items
person
never
convicted
offense
shall
unlawful
sell
give
items
described
section
form
male
female
child
eighteen
years
age
every
licensee
must
keep
record
every
item
effect
paraphernalia
accessory
thing
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
sold
record
shall
open
inspection
police
officer
time
hours
business
record
shall
contain
name
address
purchaser
name
quantity
product
date
time
sale
licensee
agent
licensee
signature
records
shall
retained
less
two
years
applicant
shall
comply
applicable
regulations
department
health
services
police
department
items
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
section
village
clerk
hereby
authorized
publish
ordinance
pamphlet
form
section
ordinance
shall
full
force
effect
may
passage
approval
publication
according
law
footnotes
text
ordinance
set
forth
appendix
opinion
guidelines
provide
license
guidelines
items
effect
paraphernalia
accessory
thing
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
paper
white
paper
tobacco
oriented
paper
necessarily
designed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
may
displayed
paper
colorful
design
names
oriented
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
displayed
covered
roach
clips
designed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
therefore
covered
pipes
displayed
away
proximity
nonwhite
paper
tobacco
oriented
paper
displayed
within
proximity
roach
clips
literature
encouraging
illegal
use
cannabis
illegal
drugs
covered
otherwise
covered
paraphernalia
displayed
roach
clips
literature
encouraging
illegal
use
cannabis
illegal
drugs
covered
ordinance
hoffman
estates
administrative
procedure
ordinance
enacted
prior
drug
paraphernalia
ordinance
provides
interested
person
may
petition
adoption
interpretive
rule
petition
denied
person
may
place
matter
agenda
appropriate
village
committee
review
village
attorney
indicated
interpretive
rules
adopted
respect
drug
paraphernalia
ordinance
one
yet
applied
license
app
facial
challenge
context
means
claim
law
invalid
toto
therefore
incapable
valid
application
steffel
thompson
evaluating
facial
challenge
state
law
federal
must
course
consider
limiting
construction
state
enforcement
agency
proffered
grayned
city
rockford
making
determination
evaluate
ambiguous
well
unambiguous
scope
enactment
extent
vagueness
law
affects
overbreadth
analysis
long
recognized
ambiguous
meanings
cause
citizens
steer
far
wider
unlawful
zone
boundaries
forbidden
areas
clearly
marked
baggett
bullitt
quoting
speiser
randall
see
grayned
supra
cf
young
american
mini
theatres
agueness
challenges
statutes
involve
first
amendment
freedoms
must
examined
light
facts
case
hand
mazurie
see
powell
national
dairy
products
one
whose
conduct
statute
clearly
applies
may
successfully
challenge
vagueness
parker
levy
rationale
evident
sustain
challenge
complainant
must
prove
enactment
vague
sense
requires
person
conform
conduct
imprecise
comprehensible
normative
standard
rather
sense
standard
conduct
specified
coates
city
cincinnati
provision
simply
core
smith
goguen
flipside
explained
placed
items
village
considers
drug
paraphernalia
locations
near
checkout
counter
point
purchase
items
others
small
apt
shoplifted
app
flipside
assert
manner
placement
motivated
part
desire
communicate
information
customers
flipside
also
argues
ordinance
overbroad
extend
innocent
lawful
uses
items
well
uses
illegal
drugs
brief
appellee
argument
seems
confuse
vagueness
overbreadth
doctrines
flipside
objecting
determine
whether
ordinance
regulates
items
lawful
uses
complaining
vagueness
find
claim
unpersuasive
facial
challenge
see
infra
flipside
objecting
ordinance
inhibit
innocent
uses
items
found
covered
ordinance
complaining
denial
substantive
due
process
latter
claim
obviously
lacks
merit
retailer
right
sell
smoking
accessories
purchaser
right
buy
use
entitled
minimal
due
process
protection
village
presented
evidence
illegal
drug
use
community
app
regulation
items
lawful
well
unlawful
uses
irrational
means
discouraging
drug
use
see
exxon
governor
maryland
hostility
lower
courts
drug
paraphernalia
laws
particularly
regulating
sale
items
many
innocent
uses
see
record
revolution
city
parma
vacated
remanded
may
reflect
belief
measures
ineffective
stemming
illegal
drug
use
perceived
defect
however
defect
clarity
unlikely
event
state
construed
ordinance
prohibiting
sale
pipes
whatever
description
seller
corncob
pipes
complain
law
unduly
vague
course
object
law
intended
cover
items
papachristou
city
jacksonville
dictum
collecting
cases
see
national
dairy
products
cf
smith
goguen
see
joseph
seagram
sons
hostetter
mcgowan
maryland
see
barenblatt
black
warren
douglas
joined
dissenting
winters
new
york
see
colautti
franklin
boyce
motor
lines
screws
plurality
opinion
see
note
doctrine
rev
see
papachristou
supra
grayned
village
stipulated
purpose
ordinance
discourage
use
regulated
items
app
moreover
prohibitory
stigmatizing
effects
ordinance
clear
appeals
remarked
retailers
willing
brand
sellers
drug
paraphernalia
customers
buy
items
condition
signing
names
addresses
register
available
police
proposed
register
entitled
retail
record
items
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
record
complaint
app
argument
counsel
village
admitted
ordinance
tr
oral
arg
district
apparently
relied
principally
growing
vernacular
understanding
paraphernalia
items
therefore
separately
analyze
meaning
designed
marketed
use
agree
appeals
regulation
paraphernalia
alone
provide
much
warning
nature
items
regulated
guidelines
explicitly
provide
white
paper
may
displayed
roach
clips
designed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
therefore
covered
emphasis
added
appeals
criticized
latter
definition
failing
explain
roach
clip
criticism
unfounded
technical
term
sufficiently
clear
meaning
drug
paraphernalia
industry
without
undue
burden
flipside
easily
determine
meaning
term
see
american
heritage
dictionary
english
language
defining
roach
butt
marijuana
cigarette
lingeman
drugs
dictionary
defining
roach
roach
holder
moreover
explanation
retailer
may
display
certain
paper
necessarily
designed
use
clarifies
ordinance
least
embraces
items
necessarily
designed
use
cannabis
illegal
drugs
readily
apparent
hoffman
estates
scheme
designed
use
phrase
refers
physical
characteristics
items
deemed
per
se
fashioned
use
drugs
intentional
conduct
implicated
phrase
intent
designer
patent
holder
manufacturer
whose
intent
item
design
absorbed
physical
attributes
structural
design
finished
product
brief
appellee
moreover
village
president
described
drug
paraphernalia
items
anufactured
purpose
marketed
purpose
app
emphasis
added
american
heritage
dictionary
english
language
gives
following
alternative
definition
head
slang
one
frequent
user
drugs
theoretical
possibility
village
enforce
ordinance
paper
clip
placed
next
rolling
stone
magazine
due
process
significance
unless
possibility
ripens
prosecution
appeals
also
referred
potential
fourth
amendment
problems
resulting
recordkeeping
requirement
implies
customer
purchases
item
designed
marketed
use
illegal
cannabis
drugs
intends
use
item
illegal
cannabis
drugs
implication
customer
subject
police
scrutiny
even
search
warrant
basis
purchase
legal
item
address
fourth
amendment
issues
challenge
difficult
determine
whether
fourth
amendment
rights
seriously
threatened
flipside
offered
evidence
concrete
threat
postenforcement
proceeding
flipside
may
attempt
demonstrate
ordinance
employed
unconstitutional
manner
standing
raise
objection
appropriate
defer
resolution
problems
showing
made
justice
white
concurring
judgment
agree
judgment
appeals
must
reversed
however
believe
necessary
discuss
overbreadth
problem
order
reach
result
appeals
held
ordinance
void
vagueness
discuss
problem
overbreadth
opinion
reversed
simply
erred
analysis
vagueness
problem
presented
ordinance
agree
majority
facial
vagueness
challenge
economic
regulation
must
demonstrate
enactment
impermissibly
vague
applications
ante
also
agree
majority
statement
marketed
use
standard
ordinance
sufficiently
clear
view
need
go
transparently
clear
particular
conduct
restricted
ordinance
ordinance
survives
facial
challenge
vagueness
grounds
technically
overbreadth
standing
doctrine
permits
parties
cases
involving
first
amendment
challenges
government
restrictions
noncommercial
speech
argue
regulation
invalid
effect
first
amendment
rights
others
presently
broadrick
oklahoma
whether
appellee
may
make
use
overbreadth
doctrine
depends
first
instance
whether
colorable
claim
ordinance
infringes
constitutionally
protected
noncommercial
speech
others
although
appellee
claims
ordinance
effect
argument
tenuous
best
left
lower
courts
initial
determination
accordingly
concur
judgment
reversing
decision