coleman
alabama
argued
november
decided
june
petitioners
convicted
assault
intent
murder
alabama
appeals
affirmed
argue
identifications
made
fatally
tainted
prejudicial
lineup
occurred
prior
wade
gilbert
california
requiring
exclusion
tainted
identification
evidence
alabama
failure
provide
appointed
counsel
preliminary
hearing
critical
stage
prosecution
unconstitutionally
denied
assistance
counsel
victim
testified
car
lights
looking
straight
saw
petitioner
shot
saw
petitioner
face
face
also
stated
identified
gunman
station
house
formal
lineup
began
identified
spoke
words
used
assailants
sole
purposes
preliminary
hearing
alabama
law
determine
whether
sufficient
evidence
warrant
presenting
case
grand
jury
fix
bail
bailable
offenses
trial
scrupulously
followed
pointer
texas
prohibits
use
testimony
given
pretrial
proceeding
accused
benefit
counsel
held
convictions
vacated
case
remanded
determine
whether
denial
counsel
preliminary
hearing
harmless
error
pp
app
vacated
remanded
justice
brennan
joined
justice
douglas
justice
white
justice
marshall
three
points
enumerated
directly
justice
black
third
point
concluded
record
trial
err
finding
victim
identifications
stem
lineup
procedure
impermissibly
suggestive
give
rise
substantial
likelihood
irreparable
misidentification
pp
preliminary
hearing
critical
stage
alabama
criminal
process
indigent
accused
much
entitled
aid
counsel
trial
powell
alabama
pp
although
nothing
occurred
preliminary
hearing
used
trial
record
reveal
whether
petitioners
otherwise
prejudiced
absence
counsel
hearing
question
whether
denial
counsel
harmless
error
answered
first
instance
alabama
courts
pp
justice
black
concluded
petitioners
right
assistance
counsel
preliminary
hearing
deemed
part
fair
trial
judges
sixth
amendment
establishes
right
counsel
criminal
prosecutions
alabama
preliminary
hearing
definite
part
stage
criminal
prosecution
pp
trial
err
permitting
courtroom
identification
petitioners
victim
previously
identified
lineup
requirements
fifth
sixth
amendments
satisfied
prosecution
declined
trial
introduce
lineup
identifications
evidence
pp
justice
harlan
concurs
conclusion
petitioners
constitutional
rights
violated
refused
counsel
preliminary
hearing
pp
david
clark
assistant
attorney
general
alabama
argued
cause
respondent
brief
macdonald
gallion
attorney
general
justice
brennan
announced
judgment
delivered
following
opinion
petitioners
convicted
alabama
circuit
assault
intent
murder
shooting
one
reynolds
wife
parked
car
alabama
highway
change
flat
tire
alabama
appeals
affirmed
app
alabama
denied
review
granted
certiorari
vacate
remand
petitioners
make
two
claims
first
argue
subjected
lineup
circumstances
unduly
prejudicial
conducive
irreparable
misidentification
fatally
taint
reynolds
identifications
trial
second
argue
preliminary
hearing
prior
indictment
critical
stage
prosecution
alabama
failure
provide
appointed
counsel
hearing
therefore
unconstitutionally
denied
assistance
counsel
trial
reynolds
testified
july
engaged
changing
tire
three
men
approached
across
highway
one
shot
short
distance
away
three
ran
within
three
four
feet
reynolds
arose
stooped
position
held
wife
left
car
watch
worked
one
men
put
hand
reynolds
shoulder
reynolds
testified
coleman
within
seconds
car
lights
approached
three
men
turned
ran
across
road
turned
go
reynolds
shot
second
time
identified
petitioner
stephens
gunman
stating
saw
car
lights
looking
straight
reynolds
repeated
testimony
direct
said
saw
coleman
face
face
looked
face
got
real
good
look
pretrial
hearing
petitioners
motion
suppress
identification
evidence
detective
fordham
testified
spoken
briefly
reynolds
hospital
two
days
assault
two
weeks
later
neither
occasion
reynolds
able
provide
much
information
assailants
hospital
gave
vague
description
attackers
young
black
males
close
age
height
petitioners
negro
stephens
coleman
however
detective
fordham
also
testified
time
reynolds
gave
description
considerable
pain
consequently
questioning
brief
detective
stated
reynolds
identify
assailants
mug
shots
appear
whether
pictures
petitioners
among
shown
detective
hart
testified
lineup
held
october
request
police
stated
reynolds
identified
petitioner
stephens
spontaneously
formal
lineup
even
began
six
men
brought
warden
stage
otis
stephens
get
position
stage
number
one
reynolds
identified
one
assailants
reynolds
gave
similar
testimony
soon
stepped
inside
door
seen
previous
stepped
inside
door
recognized
soon
stepped
stage
said
man
one
one
shot
reynolds
also
testified
identified
coleman
lineup
coleman
act
request
reynolds
made
lineup
participants
speak
certain
words
used
attackers
reynolds
admitted
tell
detective
hart
identification
later
lineup
detective
stated
recall
whether
reynolds
told
identification
coleman
spoke
words
said
record
trial
erred
finding
reynolds
identification
petitioners
stem
identification
procedure
lineup
impermissibly
suggestive
give
rise
substantial
likelihood
irreparable
misidentification
simmons
supra
indeed
find
evidence
adduced
suppression
hearing
reynolds
identifications
entirely
based
upon
observations
time
assault
induced
conduct
lineup
merit
three
arguments
offered
petitioners
contrary
conclusion
first
reynolds
testified
police
asked
go
city
jail
took
granted
police
caught
assailants
record
utterly
devoid
evidence
anything
police
said
prompted
reynolds
virtually
spontaneous
identification
petitioners
among
lineup
participants
proceeding
got
way
petitioners
next
contend
lineup
unfair
codefendant
ones
required
say
words
used
one
attackers
conflict
testimony
point
petitioner
stephens
testified
petitioners
codefendant
ones
spoke
words
reynolds
testified
men
lineup
spoke
detective
hart
stated
participants
spoke
words
case
find
evidence
reynolds
identified
petitioners
either
said
anything
therefore
failure
require
participants
say
words
aid
influence
identifications
finally
petitioner
coleman
contends
unfairly
singled
wear
hat
though
participants
bareheaded
one
attackers
worn
hat
although
record
demonstrates
coleman
fact
wear
hat
lineup
nothing
record
shows
required
moreover
appear
reynolds
identification
coleman
lineup
based
fact
remembered
coleman
worn
hat
time
assault
contrary
conclude
testimony
reynolds
asked
make
john
henry
coleman
take
hat
move
back
wanted
see
coleman
face
clearly
ii
preliminary
hearing
required
step
alabama
prosecution
prosecutor
may
seek
indictment
directly
grand
jury
without
preliminary
hearing
ex
parte
campbell
opinion
alabama
appeals
case
instructs
us
alabama
law
sole
purposes
preliminary
hearing
determine
whether
sufficient
evidence
accused
warrant
presenting
case
grand
jury
fix
bail
offense
bailable
ala
see
code
tit
continued
preliminary
hearing
accused
required
advance
defenses
failure
preclude
availing
every
defense
may
upon
trial
case
also
pointer
state
texas
bars
admission
testimony
given
proceeding
accused
benefit
counsel
thus
nothing
occurring
preliminary
hearing
absence
counsel
substantially
prejudice
rights
accused
trial
ala
inability
indigent
accused
realize
advantages
lawyer
assistance
compels
conclusion
alabama
preliminary
hearing
critical
stage
state
criminal
process
accused
much
entitled
aid
counsel
trial
powell
alabama
supra
iii
accordingly
vacate
petitioners
convictions
remand
case
alabama
courts
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
may
deem
appropriate
determine
whether
denial
counsel
harmless
error
see
gilbert
california
supra
therefore
whether
convictions
reinstated
new
trial
ordered
ordered
footnotes
justice
douglas
justice
white
justice
marshall
join
part
ii
textbook
criminal
procedure
alabama
clinton
mcgee
university
alabama
press
preliminary
hearing
examination
trial
ordinary
sense
final
determination
guilt
proceeding
whereby
accused
discharged
held
answer
facts
warrant
seeks
determine
whether
probable
cause
believing
crime
committed
whether
accused
probably
guilty
order
may
informed
nature
charge
allow
state
take
necessary
steps
bring
trial
hearing
also
serves
perpetuate
evidence
keep
necessary
witnesses
within
control
state
also
safeguards
accused
groundless
vindictive
prosecutions
avoids
accused
state
expense
inconvenience
public
trial
justice
black
justice
douglas
justice
white
justice
marshall
join
part
iii
trial
judge
held
hearing
two
months
trial
motions
behalf
petitioners
suppress
evidence
discovery
whatsoever
obtained
preliminary
hearing
statements
relating
identification
state
conceded
motion
granted
statements
either
petitioner
taken
police
upon
arrests
written
oral
confessions
made
therefore
offered
trial
early
stage
hearing
motions
trial
judge
said
consistent
ruling
know
law
contrary
basis
happened
preliminary
hearing
lawyer
representing
defendant
anything
may
occurred
preliminary
might
work
defendant
whether
anything
said
assuming
might
taken
stand
anything
nature
trial
case
merits
inadmissible
anticipate
state
offering
anything
like
ruling
ever
since
changed
ways
things
material
standpoint
man
represented
counsel
preliminary
made
statement
said
guilty
know
lot
times
might
say
guilty
admissible
represented
counsel
sort
thing
mr
wholeheartedly
agree
conclusion
part
ii
prevailing
opinion
accused
constitutional
right
assistance
counsel
preliminary
hearing
alabama
grants
criminal
defendants
purpose
preliminary
hearing
alabama
determine
whether
offense
committed
whether
probable
cause
charging
defendant
offense
magistrate
finds
probable
cause
charging
defendant
offense
defendant
must
alabama
law
either
incarcerated
admitted
bail
absence
finding
probable
cause
defendant
must
released
custody
code
tit
preliminary
hearing
therefore
definite
part
stage
criminal
prosecution
alabama
plain
language
sixth
amendment
requires
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
assistance
counsel
defence
moreover
every
attorney
experience
representing
criminal
defendants
state
preliminary
hearing
similar
alabama
knows
sometimes
sad
experience
adequate
representation
requires
counsel
present
preliminary
hearing
protect
interests
client
practical
importance
preliminary
hearing
discussed
prevailing
opinion
considerations
outlined
seem
sufficient
compel
conclusion
preliminary
hearing
critical
stage
proceedings
accused
must
afforded
assistance
counsel
meaningful
defense
trial
guaranteed
bill
rights
fear
prevailing
opinion
seems
times
proceed
premise
constitutional
principle
ultimately
stake
defendant
right
counsel
guaranteed
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
rather
right
fair
trial
conceived
judges
phrase
appealing
one
neither
bill
rights
part
constitution
contains
pragmatic
authors
constitution
bill
rights
think
wisely
use
vague
indefinite
elastic
language
instead
provided
defendant
clear
emphatic
guarantees
counsel
defense
speedy
trial
trial
jury
confrontation
witnesses
unequivocal
definite
rights
explicit
commands
constitution
provide
full
description
kind
fair
trial
constitution
guarantees
judgment
document
leaves
room
judges
either
add
detract
commands
part
unauthorized
judicial
toying
carefully
selected
language
constitution
think
wisest
best
charter
government
existence
declares
man
charged
crime
shall
afforded
lawyer
defend
even
though
judges
throughout
entire
declare
think
fairness
requires
accused
shall
assistance
counsel
defense
one
still
prefer
trust
liberty
citizen
plain
language
constitution
rather
sense
fairness
particular
judges
also
agree
prevailing
opinion
rejecting
petitioners
claim
identification
victim
assault
suppressed
claim
relies
mainly
stovall
denno
held
identification
suppressed
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
tainted
unnecessarily
suggestive
pretrial
lineup
dissented
stovall
partly
ground
majority
new
suppression
rule
classic
example
using
due
process
clause
write
law
notions
fairness
decency
fundamental
justice
total
disregard
language
constitution
also
argued
stovall
right
counsel
lineup
declared
day
wade
held
fully
retroactive
stovall
denno
accordingly
believe
petitioners
case
entitled
counsel
time
lineup
participated
alabama
failure
provide
counsel
violated
petitioners
rights
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
however
reasons
stated
separate
opinion
wade
believe
requirements
fifth
sixth
amendments
satisfied
alabama
prosecutors
declined
trial
introduce
pretrial
lineup
identification
evidence
accordingly
concur
conclusion
part
prevailing
opinion
alabama
err
permitting
courtroom
identification
petitioners
witness
previously
identified
lineup
reasons
stated
agree
petitioners
convictions
must
vacated
case
remanded
alabama
courts
consideration
whether
denial
counsel
preliminary
hearing
harmless
error
decision
chapman
california
justice
douglas
joined
justice
brennan
opinion
add
word
think
strict
construction
constitution
requires
result
reached
critical
words
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
assistance
counsel
defence
justice
black
preliminary
hearing
definite
part
stage
criminal
prosecution
alabama
criminal
prosecution
certainly
start
trial
starts
commencement
trial
start
criminal
prosecution
constitutional
sense
indigents
likely
go
trial
without
effective
representation
counsel
lawyers
defense
need
time
prepare
defense
prosecution
needs
time
investigations
procedures
make
investigation
timely
telling
shorthand
expression
used
words
critical
stage
describe
whether
preliminary
phase
criminal
trial
part
criminal
prosecution
used
sixth
amendment
sixth
amendment
controls
ideas
efficient
criminal
code
provide
take
nearly
years
doubt
decide
whether
alabama
preliminary
hearing
part
criminal
prosecution
within
meaning
sixth
amendment
question
never
reached
prior
case
experience
approach
one
available
case
controversy
jurisdiction
article
iii
constitution
adhere
mandate
constitution
give
merely
meaning
appeals
personal
tastes
time
time
sit
read
terms
light
realities
criminal
prosecutions
truly
mean
impressed
need
kind
strict
construction
experiences
various
russian
journeys
nation
detention
incommunicado
common
practice
period
permissible
detention
extends
nine
months
custodial
interrogation
clear
critical
stage
trial
takes
place
long
courtroom
formalities
commence
apparent
one
attends
criminal
trials
russia
viewed
never
put
issue
question
guilt
guilt
issue
resolved
inner
precincts
prison
questioning
police
courtroom
trial
concerned
issue
punishment
custodial
interrogation
practice
nations
critical
give
criminal
prosecutions
used
sixth
amendment
strained
narrow
meaning
held
include
phase
brother
harlan
dissent
miranda
arizona
called
sixth
amendment
cases
cited
majority
linchpins
ruling
accused
custodial
interrogation
entitled
assistance
counsel
properly
although
main
emphasis
miranda
opinion
use
custodial
interrogation
exact
incriminating
statements
commands
fourteenth
fifth
amendments
like
preliminary
hearing
present
case
custodial
interrogation
obviously
part
criminal
prosecution
sixth
amendment
honors
strict
construction
guide
article
rsfsr
codes
criminal
procedure
provides
confinement
guard
connection
investigation
case
may
continue
two
months
reason
special
complexity
case
may
period
prolonged
three
months
day
confinement
guard
procurator
autonomous
republic
territory
region
autonomous
region
national
area
military
procurator
military
region
fleet
six
months
rsfsr
procurator
chief
military
procurator
prolongation
period
confinement
guard
may
carried
exceptional
instances
ussr
procurator
general
period
additional
three
months
soviet
criminal
law
procedure
rsfsr
codes
berman
spindler
transl
article
rsfsr
codes
criminal
procedure
provides
part
defense
counsel
shall
permitted
participate
case
moment
accused
informed
completion
preliminary
investigation
presented
proceedings
case
become
acquainted
soviet
criminal
law
procedure
rsfsr
codes
supra
nation
monopoly
use
device
although
present
greek
government
according
report
commission
human
rights
council
europe
reached
high
level
efficiency
use
torture
falanga
bastinado
method
torture
known
centuries
beating
feet
wooden
metal
stick
bar
skillfully
done
breaks
bones
makes
skin
lesions
leaves
permanent
recognizable
marks
causes
intense
pain
swelling
feet
use
falanga
described
variety
situations
bench
chair
without
shoes
sometimes
water
thrown
feet
sometimes
victim
made
run
around
beatings
victims
also
gagged
falanga
severe
beatings
parts
body
commonest
forms
torture
appear
evidence
forms
described
example
application
electric
shock
squeezing
head
vice
pulling
hair
head
public
region
kicking
male
genital
organs
dripping
water
head
intense
noises
prevent
sleep
falanga
commonest
form
torture
cases
able
establish
facts
substantial
degree
also
appears
great
frequency
allegations
raised
proceedings
regard
named
detainees
principal
forms
alleged
treatment
frequently
several
forms
combined
one
case
follows
two
categories
cases
examined
allegations
european
commission
human
rights
report
greek
case
vol
pt
pp
justice
white
concurring
agree
justice
harlan
recent
cases
furnish
ample
ground
holding
preliminary
hearing
critical
event
progress
criminal
case
therefore
join
prevailing
opinion
hesitation
since
requiring
appointment
counsel
may
result
fewer
preliminary
hearings
jurisdictions
prosecutor
free
avoid
taking
case
directly
grand
jury
ruling
may
also
invite
eliminating
preliminary
hearing
system
entirely
expect
application
standard
remand
produce
results
approximating
contemplated
justice
harlan
separately
stated
views
whether
denying
petitioners
counsel
preliminary
hearing
harmless
beyond
reasonable
doubt
depends
upon
assessment
factors
made
denial
error
assessment
ignore
fact
petitioners
tried
found
guilty
jury
possibility
counsel
detected
preclusive
flaws
state
showing
practical
purposes
mooted
trial
state
produced
evidence
satisfying
jury
petitioners
guilt
beyond
reasonable
doubt
also
wholly
speculative
case
assume
either
state
witnesses
trial
testified
inconsistently
testimony
petitioners
counsel
preliminary
hearing
counsel
present
hearing
known
much
state
case
actually
went
trial
result
trial
might
different
seems
extremely
unlikely
matters
related
bail
early
psychiatric
examination
ever
raise
reasonable
doubts
integrity
trial
remains
possibility
justice
harlan
suggests
important
testimony
witnesses
unavailable
trial
preserved
counsel
present
opposing
witnesses
examine
witnesses
defense
case
petitioners
entitled
new
trial
justice
harlan
concurring
part
dissenting
part
felt
free
consider
case
upon
clean
slate
voted
affirm
convictions
light
lengths
right
appointed
counsel
carried
recent
decisions
see
miranda
arizona
wade
gilbert
california
mathis
orozco
texas
consider
course
open
due
regard
way
adjudicatory
process
conceive
work
continuing
viability
cases
cited
directly
us
decision
occasion
arises
face
terms
considerations
recently
expressed
elsewhere
see
dissenting
opinion
baldwin
new
york
decided
today
post
opinion
concurring
result
welsh
accordingly
constrained
agree
conclusion
petitioners
constitutional
rights
violated
alabama
refused
appoint
counsel
represent
preliminary
hearing
dissent
however
terms
remand
issue
well
refusal
accord
petitioners
benefit
wade
case
connection
police
lineup
contentions
indeed
strange
held
suspect
accused
entitled
counsel
pretrial
stages
police
investigation
whether
station
house
miranda
even
home
orozco
hold
left
fend
first
formal
confrontation
courtroom
given
cases
referred
escape
conclusion
petitioners
constitutional
rights
must
held
violated
denying
appointed
counsel
preliminary
hearing
consider
scope
remand
broad
amorphous
think
reversal
convictions
lack
counsel
preliminary
hearing
follow
unless
petitioners
able
show
remand
prejudiced
defense
trial
favorable
testimony
might
otherwise
preserved
irretrievably
lost
virtue
counsel
help
present
affirmative
case
preliminary
hearing
regard
course
erroneously
excluded
testimony
petitioners
show
weight
trial
constitute
exclusion
reversible
error
well
demonstrate
actual
likelihood
testimony
presented
preserved
preliminary
hearing
opinion
mere
speculation
defense
counsel
might
able
better
trial
present
preliminary
hearing
suffice
vitiate
conviction
remand
chapman
rule
seems
leave
way
open
sort
speculation
ii
despite
continuing
disagreement
wade
supra
must
dissent
refusal
accord
petitioners
benefit
wade
holding
neither
petitioner
afforded
counsel
police
lineup
identification
majority
action
results
holding
stovall
denno
making
wade
applicable
lineups
occurring
date
decision
present
lineup
taken
place
well
reasons
explained
dissent
desist
longer
follow
retroactivity
doctrine
announced
stovall
cases
us
direct
review
situation
judge
case
light
wade
wade
rule
requires
exclusion
identification
preceded
pretrial
lineup
accused
represented
counsel
unless
identification
found
derived
source
independent
tainted
pretrial
viewing
determination
must
first
instance
made
trial
therefore
send
case
back
score
standpoint
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
way
think
state
cases
kind
judged
see
concurring
opinion
gideon
wainwright
said
denial
appointed
counsel
preliminary
hearing
carrying
consequences
beyond
involved
alabama
procedure
offensive
concept
fundamental
fairness
embodied
due
process
clause
case
course
different
state
permitted
introduce
trial
evidence
collected
presented
preliminary
hearing
fortiori
thought
lack
counsel
police
held
wade
denial
due
process
require
reversal
even
standpoint
sixth
amendment
found
difficult
say
language
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
assistance
counsel
defence
emphasis
supplied
intended
reach
events
cf
sanders
chief
justice
burger
dissenting
agree
matter
sound
policy
counsel
made
available
persons
subjected
preliminary
hearing
provided
either
statute
rulemaking
process
however
accept
notion
constitution
commands
criminal
prosecution
although
justice
stewart
whose
opinion
join
justice
harlan
justice
white
noted
difficulties
constitutional
practical
grounds
today
holding
separately
set
forth
additional
reasons
dissent
certainly
justice
harlan
justice
white
suggest
word
constitution
either
requires
contemplates
result
reached
unlike
however
acquiesce
prior
holdings
purportedly
nonetheless
erroneously
based
constitution
approach
simply
acknowledgement
previously
amended
sixth
amendment
feels
bound
action
rely
solely
years
contrary
constitutional
interpretation
indeed
odd
business
taken
nearly
two
centuries
discover
constitutional
mandate
counsel
preliminary
hearing
even
excuse
conditions
changed
preliminary
hearing
ancient
institution
deference
bound
reject
categorically
justice
harlan
justice
white
thesis
said
lately
controls
constitution
holdings
entitled
deference
join
employing
recent
cases
rather
constitution
bootstrap
result
even
though
agree
objective
counsel
preliminary
hearings
placing
premium
recent
cases
rather
language
constitution
makes
dangerously
simple
future
courts
using
technique
interpretation
operate
continuing
constitutional
convention
wish
make
clear
disagreement
prevailing
opinion
directed
primarily
reasoning
process
rather
broad
social
legal
desirability
result
reached
decide
constitution
commands
result
simply
think
desirable
one
indeed
many
studies
including
american
bar
association
criminal
justice
project
acknowledged
wisdom
providing
counsel
preliminary
hearing
aba
project
standards
criminal
justice
providing
defense
services
approved
draft
provided
either
statute
rulemaking
process
since
constitution
require
justice
white
joining
prevailing
opinion
reservations
belies
essence
matter
recent
cases
furnish
ample
ground
holding
preliminary
hearing
critical
event
progress
criminal
case
emphasis
added
constitution
provided
counsel
furnished
every
critical
event
progress
criminal
case
another
story
contrast
variety
verbal
combinations
employed
majority
justify
today
disposition
sixth
amendment
laudable
precision
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
assistance
counsel
emphasis
added
relevant
determination
whether
preliminary
hearing
criminal
prosecution
whether
critical
event
progress
criminal
case
inventing
verbal
formula
prevailing
opinion
simply
seeks
reshape
constitution
accordance
predilections
deemed
desirable
constitutional
interpretation
easy
matter
especially
cautious
substituting
notions
framers
heed
justice
black
recent
admonition
difference
constitution
written
founders
unwritten
constitution
formulated
judges
according
ideas
fairness
basis
north
carolina
pearce
separate
opinion
black
emphasis
original
federal
courts
provided
statute
three
steps
follow
arrest
preliminary
hearing
fed
rule
crim
proc
grand
jury
inquiry
arraignment
fed
rule
crim
proc
know
course
hearing
officer
preliminary
hearing
concludes
hold
person
possible
grand
jury
action
counsel
permitted
attend
latter
proceedings
grand
jury
returns
indictment
accused
must
enter
plea
arraignment
hearing
counsel
required
hamilton
alabama
alabama
federal
system
preliminary
hearing
inquiry
whether
arrested
person
discharged
whether
contrary
probable
cause
submit
evidence
grand
jury
charging
authority
consideration
verdict
flow
hearing
magistrate
determination
discharge
unlike
acquittal
bar
later
indictment
thus
trial
sense
lawyers
judges
use
term
moreover
hearing
magistrate
indict
pass
narrow
question
whether
inquiry
warranted
recognizing
however
preliminary
hearing
unimportant
step
progress
criminal
case
already
held
disclosures
uncounseled
person
hearing
may
used
later
tried
white
maryland
see
also
pointer
texas
today
holding
thus
something
anomaly
new
discovery
counsel
constitutionally
required
preliminary
hearing
since
counsel
attend
subsequent
grand
jury
inquiry
even
though
witnesses
including
person
eventually
charged
may
interrogated
secret
session
current
mode
constitutional
analysis
subscribed
recent
cases
requires
counsel
present
preliminary
hearings
reconciled
fact
constitution
permit
assistance
counsel
decidedly
critical
grand
jury
inquiry
finally
pointed
already
protected
accused
absence
counsel
preliminary
hearing
providing
statements
uncounseled
person
inadmissible
trial
prevailing
opinion
fails
explain
salutary
indeed
drastic
remedy
longer
sufficient
protection
preliminary
hearing
stage
unless
surreptitiously
convert
preliminary
hearing
discovery
device
need
even
step
largely
dissipated
proposed
amendments
pretrial
discovery
criminal
cases
see
judicial
conference
committee
rules
practice
procedure
proposed
amendments
federal
rules
criminal
procedure
district
courts
preliminary
draft
pertinent
language
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
assistance
counsel
defence
concur
conclusion
due
process
violated
identification
procedures
employed
justice
stewart
chief
justice
joins
dissenting
july
night
casey
reynolds
wife
stopped
car
green
springs
highway
birmingham
alabama
order
change
flat
tire
soon
accosted
three
men
whose
evident
purpose
armed
robbery
rape
assailants
shot
reynolds
twice
frightened
away
lights
passing
automobile
two
months
later
petitioners
arrested
later
identified
reynolds
two
three
men
assaulted
wife
days
later
petitioners
granted
preliminary
hearing
county
judge
hearing
petitioners
neither
required
permitted
enter
plea
sole
purpose
hearing
alabama
determine
whether
sufficient
evidence
accused
warrant
presenting
case
grand
jury
fix
bail
offense
bailable
conclusion
hearing
petitioners
bound
grand
jury
bond
set
record
transcript
kind
made
hearing
less
month
later
grand
jury
returned
indictment
petitioners
charging
assault
commit
murder
promptly
indictment
lawyer
appointed
represent
arraignment
two
weeks
later
represented
appointed
counsel
entered
plea
guilty
cf
hamilton
alabama
months
later
brought
trial
represented
appointed
counsel
cf
gideon
wainwright
jury
found
guilty
charged
sentenced
penitentiary
trial
prosecution
used
incriminating
statements
made
petitioners
preliminary
hearing
convictions
us
quite
properly
set
aside
white
maryland
happen
case
prosecution
used
statement
witness
preliminary
hearing
petitioners
trial
likewise
quite
properly
set
aside
convictions
pointer
texas
happen
case
either
prevailing
opinion
today
perforce
concedes
prohibition
use
state
trial
anything
occurred
preliminary
hearing
scrupulously
observed
nevertheless
sets
aside
convictions
says
counsel
provided
petitioners
preliminary
hearing
none
cases
relied
upon
opinion
points
result
even
miranda
decision
require
counsel
present
pretrial
custodial
interrogation
case
simply
held
constitutional
guarantee
compulsory
prohibits
introduction
trial
statements
made
defendant
custodial
interrogation
miranda
guidelines
followed
see
also
wade
gilbert
california
repeat
case
evidence
anything
said
done
preliminary
hearing
introduced
petitioners
trial
prevailing
opinion
holds
today
constitution
required
alabama
provide
lawyer
petitioners
preliminary
hearing
much
seems
assure
fair
trial
assure
fair
preliminary
hearing
lawyer
preliminary
hearing
opinion
says
might
led
magistrate
refuse
bind
accused
lawyer
might
made
effective
arguments
accused
matters
necessity
early
psychiatric
examination
bail
reasons
lawyer
must
provided
elementary
logic
requires
new
preliminary
hearing
must
held
counsel
made
available
petitioners
order
provide
relief
course
necessary
set
aside
convictions
also
set
aside
grand
jury
indictments
magistrate
orders
fixing
bail
binding
petitioners
since
petitioners
found
jury
constitutional
trial
guilty
beyond
reasonable
doubt
prevailing
opinion
understandably
boggles
logical
consequences
reasoning
therein
refrains
short
turning
back
clock
ordering
new
preliminary
hearing
determine
whether
sufficient
evidence
accused
present
case
grand
jury
instead
sets
aside
convictions
remands
case
determination
whether
convictions
reinstated
new
trial
ordered
action
seems
even
quixotic
petitioners
simply
alleged
anything
happened
preliminary
hearing
turned
case
critical
fairness
trial
alleged
affirmatively
prejudiced
trial
anything
occurred
preliminary
hearing
pointed
affirmative
advantage
enjoyed
trial
lawyer
preliminary
hearing
record
transcript
kind
made
preliminary
hearing
therefore
burden
remand
petitioners
show
prejudiced
clear
burden
met
remand
futile
gesture
hand
burden
state
disprove
beyond
reasonable
doubt
speculative
advantages
petitioners
might
conceivably
enjoyed
counsel
present
preliminary
hearing
obviously
burden
met
either
simply
reverse
convictions
say
alabama
courts
figure
supposed
case
remanded
perceptiveness
far
exceed
mine
record
us
makes
clear
evidence
occurred
preliminary
hearing
used
petitioners
completed
trial
hold
therefore
absence
counsel
preliminary
hearing
deprived
petitioners
constitutional
rights
accordingly
affirm
convictions
code
tit
agree
result
reached
part
prevailing
opinion