ross
moffitt
argued
april
decided
june
respondent
indigent
represented
counsel
convicted
forgery
state
two
separate
cases
convictions
affirmed
appeals
right
north
carolina
appeals
one
case
denied
appointment
counsel
discretionary
review
north
carolina
case
denied
certiorari
denied
appointment
counsel
prepare
petition
certiorari
subsequently
federal
district
courts
denied
habeas
corpus
relief
appeals
reversed
holding
respondent
entitled
appointment
counsel
petition
review
state
petition
certiorari
held
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
require
north
carolina
provide
respondent
counsel
discretionary
appeal
state
pp
contrasted
trial
stage
criminal
proceeding
defendant
appealing
conviction
needs
attorney
shield
protect
haled
state
stripped
presumption
innocence
rather
sword
upset
prior
determination
guilt
difference
significant
since
state
may
dispense
trial
stage
without
defendant
consent
need
provide
appeal
pp
fact
appeal
provided
automatically
mean
state
acts
unfairly
refusing
provide
counsel
indigent
defendants
every
stage
way
unfairness
results
state
singles
indigents
denies
meaningful
access
appellate
system
poverty
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
require
north
carolina
provide
free
counsel
indigent
defendants
seeking
discretionary
appeals
state
pp
defendant
respondent
circumstances
denied
meaningful
access
state
simply
state
appoint
counsel
aid
seeking
review
since
stage
north
carolina
multitiered
appellate
system
least
transcript
record
trial
proceedings
brief
appeals
setting
forth
claims
error
frequently
opinion
disposing
case
materials
supplemented
pro
se
submission
might
made
provide
adequate
basis
decision
grant
deny
review
standards
whether
case
significant
public
interest
involves
legal
principles
major
significance
likely
conflicts
previous
decision
pp
indigent
defendant
opportunity
counsel
prepare
initial
brief
appeals
nature
discretionary
review
make
relative
handicap
defendant
may
comparison
wealthy
defendant
counsel
every
stage
proceeding
far
less
handicap
borne
indigent
defendant
denied
counsel
initial
appeal
right
douglas
california
particular
service
might
benefit
indigent
defendant
mean
service
constitutionally
required
duty
state
duplicate
legal
arsenal
may
privately
retained
criminal
defendant
continuing
effort
reverse
conviction
assure
indigent
defendant
done
adequate
opportunity
present
claims
fairly
context
state
appellate
process
similarly
fourteenth
amendment
require
north
carolina
provide
counsel
convicted
indigent
defendant
seeking
file
petition
certiorari
circumstances
state
provided
counsel
appeal
right
brief
prepared
counsel
together
one
perhaps
two
state
appellate
opinions
available
order
decide
whether
grant
certiorari
pp
since
right
seek
discretionary
review
conferred
federal
statutes
state
argument
state
created
right
appeal
must
give
persons
equal
opportunity
enjoy
right
terms
inapplicable
griffin
illinois
douglas
california
supra
distinguished
suggestion
state
responsible
providing
counsel
indigent
defendant
petitioning
simply
initiated
prosecution
leading
judgment
sought
reviewed
unsupported
either
reason
authority
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
white
blackmun
powell
joined
douglas
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
marshall
joined
post
jacob
safron
assistant
attorney
general
north
carolina
argued
cause
petitioners
brief
robert
morgan
attorney
general
thomas
anderson
appointment
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
robert
shevin
attorney
general
enoch
whitney
assistant
attorney
general
state
florida
william
scott
attorney
general
james
zagel
assistant
attorney
general
state
illinois
andrew
miller
attorney
general
robert
shepherd
assistant
attorney
general
commonwealth
virginia
marshall
hartman
james
flug
filed
brief
national
legal
aid
defender
assn
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
asked
case
decide
whether
douglas
california
requires
appointment
counsel
indigent
state
defendants
first
appeal
right
extended
require
counsel
discretionary
state
appeals
applications
review
appeals
fourth
circuit
held
appointment
required
due
process
equal
protection
clauses
fourteenth
amendment
case
us
resulted
consolidation
two
separate
cases
north
carolina
criminal
prosecutions
brought
respective
superior
courts
counties
mecklenburg
guilford
cases
respondent
pleaded
guilty
charges
forgery
uttering
forged
instrument
indigency
represented
trial
counsel
convicted
took
separate
appeals
north
carolina
appeals
represented
counsel
convictions
affirmed
point
procedural
histories
two
cases
diverge
following
affirmance
mecklenburg
country
conviction
respondent
sought
invoke
discretionary
review
procedures
north
carolina
counsel
approached
mecklenburg
county
superior
possible
appointment
represent
respondent
appeal
counsel
informed
state
required
furnish
counsel
petition
respondent
sought
collateral
relief
state
federal
courts
first
raising
contention
habeas
corpus
petition
filed
district
western
district
north
carolina
february
relief
denied
time
respondent
appeal
appeals
fourth
circuit
dismissed
stipulation
order
allow
respondent
first
exhaust
state
remedies
issue
exhausting
state
remedies
reapplied
habeas
relief
denied
respondent
appealed
denial
appeals
fourth
circuit
following
affirmance
conviction
guilford
county
charges
respondent
also
sought
discretionary
review
north
carolina
appeal
however
respondent
denied
counsel
rather
represented
public
defender
appointed
trial
respondent
first
appeal
north
carolina
denied
certiorari
respondent
unsuccessfully
petitioned
superior
guilford
county
counsel
prepare
petition
writ
certiorari
also
sought
relief
throughout
state
courts
motions
denied
respondent
sought
federal
habeas
relief
time
district
middle
district
north
carolina
denied
relief
respondent
took
appeal
appeals
fourth
circuit
appeals
reversed
two
district
judgments
holding
respondent
entitled
assistance
counsel
state
expense
petition
review
north
carolina
petition
certiorari
reviewing
procedures
north
carolina
appellate
system
possible
benefits
counsel
provide
indigents
seeking
review
system
stated
long
state
provides
procedures
allows
convicted
felons
seek
access
higher
help
retained
counsel
marked
absence
fairness
denying
indigent
assistance
counsel
seeks
access
granted
certiorari
consider
appeals
decision
light
douglas
california
apparently
conflicting
decisions
courts
appeals
seventh
tenth
circuits
reasons
hereafter
stated
reverse
appeals
ii
past
years
given
extensive
consideration
rights
indigent
persons
appeal
griffin
illinois
first
pertinent
cases
illinois
rule
allowing
convicted
criminal
defendant
present
claims
trial
error
illinois
procured
transcript
testimony
adduced
trial
exception
made
indigent
defendant
thus
one
unable
pay
cost
obtaining
transcript
precluded
obtaining
appellate
review
asserted
trial
error
justice
frankfurter
cast
deciding
vote
said
concurring
opinion
illinois
decreed
defendants
afford
pay
stenographic
minutes
trial
may
trial
errors
reviewed
appeal
illinois
succeeding
cases
invalidated
similar
financial
barriers
appellate
process
time
reaffirming
traditional
principle
state
obliged
provide
appeal
criminal
defendants
mckane
durston
cases
encompassed
variety
circumstances
common
theme
example
lane
brown
involved
indiana
provision
declaring
public
defender
obtain
free
transcript
hearing
coram
nobis
application
public
defender
declined
request
one
indigent
prisoner
seeking
appeal
recourse
draper
washington
state
permitted
indigent
obtain
free
transcript
trial
convicted
satisfied
trial
judge
contentions
appeal
frivolous
appealing
defendant
effect
bound
trial
conclusions
seeking
review
determination
frivolousness
since
transcript
equivalent
made
available
smith
bennett
iowa
required
filing
fee
order
process
state
habeas
corpus
application
convicted
defendant
burns
ohio
state
ohio
required
filing
fee
order
move
ohio
leave
appeal
judgment
ohio
appeals
affirming
criminal
conviction
financial
barriers
adjudication
criminal
defendant
appeal
held
violate
fourteenth
amendment
decisions
discussed
stand
proposition
state
arbitrarily
cut
appeal
rights
indigents
leaving
open
avenues
appeal
affluent
persons
douglas
california
however
case
decided
day
lane
supra
draper
supra
departed
somewhat
limited
doctrine
transcript
fee
cases
undertook
examination
whether
indigent
access
appellate
system
adequate
douglas
concluded
state
fulfill
responsibility
toward
indigent
defendants
merely
waiving
requirements
convicted
defendant
procure
transcript
pay
fee
order
appeal
held
state
must
go
provide
counsel
indigent
first
appeal
right
decision
asked
extend
today
petitioners
douglas
convicted
jury
felony
counts
took
appeals
right
california
district
appeal
filing
fee
exacted
transcript
required
order
present
arguments
appeal
appellate
process
therefore
open
petitioners
however
claimed
right
make
use
appellate
process
also
entitled
counsel
indigent
california
appellate
examined
trial
record
initiative
following
rule
california
concluded
good
whatever
served
appointment
counsel
therefore
denied
petitioners
request
appointment
counsel
held
unconstitutional
california
requirement
counsel
appeal
appointed
indigent
appellate
determined
appointment
helpful
defendant
noted
system
indigent
case
initially
reviewed
merits
without
benefit
organization
argument
counsel
contrast
persons
greater
means
faced
preliminary
ex
parte
examination
record
arguments
presented
fully
briefed
form
noted
however
decision
extended
initial
appeals
right
went
say
need
decide
whether
california
provide
counsel
indigent
seeking
discretionary
hearing
california
district
appeal
sustained
conviction
whether
counsel
must
appointed
indigent
seeking
review
appellate
affirmance
conviction
appeal
right
petition
writ
certiorari
lies
within
discretion
appropriate
observe
state
consistently
fourteenth
amendment
provide
differences
long
result
amount
denial
due
process
invidious
discrimination
williamson
lee
optical
griffin
illinois
supra
absolute
equality
required
lines
drawn
often
sustain
iii
recognition
due
process
rationale
douglas
found
opinion
dissenting
opinion
justice
harlan
douglas
stated
hen
indigent
forced
run
gantlet
preliminary
showing
merit
right
appeal
comport
fair
procedure
justice
harlan
thought
due
process
issue
douglas
one
worthy
extended
consideration
remarking
real
question
case
submit
one
permits
satisfactory
analysis
whether
state
rule
applied
case
consistent
requirements
fair
procedure
guaranteed
due
process
clause
believe
due
process
clause
requires
north
carolina
provide
respondent
counsel
discretionary
appeal
state
trial
stage
criminal
proceeding
right
indigent
defendant
counsel
fundamental
binding
upon
virtue
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
gideon
wainwright
significant
differences
trial
appellate
stages
criminal
proceeding
purpose
trial
stage
state
point
view
convert
criminal
defendant
person
presumed
innocent
one
found
guilty
beyond
reasonable
doubt
accomplish
purpose
state
employs
prosecuting
attorney
presents
evidence
challenges
witnesses
offered
defendant
argues
rulings
makes
direct
arguments
jury
seeking
persuade
defendant
guilt
circumstances
reason
reflection
require
us
recognize
adversary
system
criminal
justice
person
haled
poor
hire
lawyer
assured
fair
trial
unless
counsel
provided
contrast
ordinarily
defendant
rather
state
initiates
appellate
process
seeking
fend
efforts
state
prosecutor
rather
overturn
finding
guilt
made
judge
jury
defendant
needs
attorney
appeal
shield
protect
haled
state
stripped
presumption
innocence
rather
word
upset
prior
determination
guilt
difference
significant
one
agree
state
may
simply
dispense
trial
stage
proceedings
without
criminal
defendant
consent
clear
state
need
provide
appeal
mckane
durston
fact
appeal
provided
automatically
mean
state
acts
unfairly
refusing
provide
counsel
indigent
defendants
every
stage
way
douglas
california
supra
unfairness
results
indigents
singled
state
denied
meaningful
access
appellate
system
poverty
question
profitably
considered
equal
protection
analysis
iv
language
invoking
equal
protection
notions
prominent
douglas
cases
treating
rights
indigents
appeal
douglas
example
stated
merits
one
appeal
indigent
right
decided
without
benefit
counsel
think
unconstitutional
line
drawn
rich
poor
emphasis
original
nce
state
chooses
establish
appellate
review
criminal
cases
may
foreclose
indigents
access
phase
procedure
poverty
north
carolina
appellate
system
appellate
systems
almost
half
multitiered
providing
intermediate
appeals
appeals
created
effective
january
like
intermediate
state
appellate
courts
intended
absorb
substantial
share
caseload
previously
burdening
criminal
cases
appeal
right
lies
directly
cases
involve
sentence
death
life
imprisonment
appeal
right
criminal
cases
lies
appeals
stat
supp
second
appeal
right
lies
criminal
case
hich
directly
involves
substantial
question
arising
constitution
state
dissent
stat
decisions
appeals
direct
review
criminal
cases
may
reviewed
discretionary
basis
statute
governing
discretionary
appeals
stat
statute
provides
relevant
part
cause
appeal
taken
appeals
may
discretion
motion
party
cause
motion
certify
cause
review
either
determined
appeals
statute
provides
cause
certified
transfer
determination
appeals
reviews
decision
appeals
choice
cases
reviewed
left
entirely
within
discretion
regulated
statutory
standards
subsection
provision
causes
subject
certification
subsection
section
certification
may
made
determination
cause
appeals
opinion
subject
matter
appeal
significant
public
interest
cause
involves
legal
principles
major
significance
jurisprudence
state
decision
appeals
appears
likely
conflict
decision
facts
show
respondent
connection
mecklenburg
county
conviction
received
benefit
counsel
examining
record
trial
preparing
appellate
brief
behalf
state
appeals
thus
prior
seeking
discretionary
review
state
claims
presented
lawyer
passed
upon
appellate
douglas
california
believe
said
therefore
defendant
respondent
circumstances
denied
meaningful
access
north
carolina
simply
state
appoint
counsel
aid
seeking
review
stage
least
transcript
record
trial
proceedings
brief
behalf
appeals
setting
forth
claims
error
many
cases
opinion
appeals
disposing
case
materials
supplemented
whatever
submission
respondent
may
make
pro
se
appear
provide
north
carolina
adequate
basis
decision
grant
deny
review
fortified
conclusion
understanding
function
served
discretionary
review
north
carolina
critical
issue
perceive
whether
correct
adjudication
guilt
every
individual
case
see
griffin
illinois
rather
whether
subject
matter
appeal
significant
public
interest
whether
cause
involves
legal
principles
major
significance
jurisprudence
state
whether
decision
probable
conflict
decision
may
deny
certiorari
even
though
believes
decision
appeals
incorrect
see
peaseley
virginia
iron
coal
coke
since
decision
appears
incorrect
may
nevertheless
fail
satisfy
criteria
discussed
defendant
claims
error
organized
presented
lawyerlike
fashion
appeals
justices
north
carolina
make
decision
grant
deny
discretionary
review
able
ascertain
whether
case
satisfies
standards
established
legislature
review
say
course
skilled
lawyer
particularly
one
trained
somewhat
arcane
art
preparing
petitions
discretionary
review
prove
helpful
litigant
able
employ
indigent
defendant
seeking
review
north
carolina
therefore
somewhat
handicapped
comparison
wealthy
defendant
counsel
assisting
every
conceivable
manner
every
stage
proceeding
opportunity
counsel
prepare
initial
brief
appeals
nature
discretionary
review
north
carolina
make
relative
handicap
far
less
handicap
borne
indigent
defendant
denied
counsel
initial
appeal
right
douglas
fact
particular
service
might
benefit
indigent
defendant
mean
service
constitutionally
required
duty
state
cases
duplicate
legal
arsenal
may
privately
retained
criminal
defendant
continuing
effort
reverse
conviction
assure
indigent
defendant
adequate
opportunity
present
claims
fairly
context
state
appellate
process
think
respondent
given
opportunity
existing
north
carolina
system
much
discussion
preceding
section
equally
relevant
question
whether
state
must
provide
counsel
defendant
seeking
review
conviction
north
carolina
provided
counsel
convicted
defendant
appeal
right
brief
prepared
counsel
together
one
perhaps
two
north
carolina
appellate
opinions
available
order
may
decide
whether
grant
certiorari
review
much
like
north
carolina
discretionary
depends
numerous
factors
perceived
correctness
judgment
asked
review
also
significant
difference
source
right
seek
discretionary
review
north
carolina
source
right
seek
discretionary
review
former
conferred
statutes
state
north
carolina
latter
granted
statute
enacted
congress
thus
argument
relied
upon
griffin
douglas
cases
state
created
right
appeal
must
give
persons
equal
opportunity
enjoy
right
terms
inapplicable
right
seek
certiorari
granted
state
exists
virtue
federal
statute
without
consent
state
whose
judgment
sought
reviewed
suggestion
state
responsible
providing
counsel
one
petitioning
simply
initiated
prosecution
led
judgment
sought
reviewed
unsupported
either
reason
authority
quite
logical
rationale
douglas
griffin
indeed
perhaps
require
federal
government
furnish
compensate
counsel
petitioners
seek
certiorari
review
state
judgments
conviction
yet
followed
consistent
policy
denying
applications
appointment
counsel
persons
seeking
file
jurisdictional
statements
petitions
certiorari
see
drumm
california
mooney
new
york
oppenheimer
california
light
authorities
odd
indeed
read
fourteenth
amendment
impose
requirement
decline
vi
mean
opinion
way
discourage
matter
legislative
choice
made
counsel
available
convicted
defendants
stages
judicial
review
might
well
choose
matter
legislative
policy
may
conceivably
find
claims
public
funds
within
without
criminal
justice
system
preclude
implementation
policy
present
time
north
carolina
example
provide
counsel
indigent
defendants
seeking
discretionary
review
appeal
provide
counsel
indigent
prisoners
several
situations
appointments
required
constitutional
decision
reading
fourteenth
amendment
leaves
choices
state
respondent
denied
right
secured
federal
constitution
north
carolina
refused
provide
counsel
aid
obtaining
discretionary
appellate
review
judgment
appeals
holding
contrary
reversed
footnotes
state
moffitt
app
mecklenburg
state
moffitt
app
guilford
state
moffitt
decided
remand
case
district
appraise
substantiality
federal
claim
noted
opportunity
examine
papers
filed
state
said
circumstances
case
remedy
available
district
prisoner
release
writ
habeas
corpus
appropriate
district
determine
whether
respondent
claim
patently
frivolous
ibid
see
ex
rel
pennington
pate
peters
cox
see
appeals
case
example
examined
possible
rationales
stating
holding
douglas
grounded
equal
protection
clause
inequality
circumstances
cases
obvious
circumstances
douglas
holding
douglas
grounded
due
process
clause
justice
harlan
dissent
thought
discourse
terms
due
process
encompasses
elements
equality
simply
due
process
law
litigant
deprived
professional
assistance
litigants
similarly
situated
able
obtain
professional
assistance
benefited
concepts
fairness
equality
require
counsel
first
appeal
right
require
counsel
subsequent
discretionary
appeals
hudson
county
water
mccarter
see
brief
respondent
example
subsection
effective
time
respondent
appeals
provides
counsel
irect
review
judgment
decree
including
review
final
judgment
decrees
rendered
highest
north
carolina
decision
may
provision
apparently
construed
allow
counsel
permissive
appellate
procedures
see
section
stat
supp
provides
indigent
person
entitled
services
counsel
following
actions
proceedings
case
imprisonment
fine
five
hundred
dollars
likely
adjudged
hearing
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
chapter
general
statutes
proceeding
chapter
general
statutes
hearing
revocation
probation
confinement
likely
adjudged
result
hearing
hearing
extradition
another
state
sought
proceeding
judicial
hospitalization
chapter
article
judicial
hospitalization
article
mentally
ill
criminals
general
statutes
proceeding
involuntary
commitment
treatment
facility
article
chapter
general
statutes
civil
arrest
bail
proceeding
chapter
article
general
statutes
case
juvenile
hearing
result
commitment
institution
transfer
superior
trial
felony
charge
possible
mr
affirm
judgment
agreement
opinion
chief
judge
haynsworth
unanimous
panel
appeals
douglas
california
considered
necessity
appointed
counsel
first
appeal
right
issue
us
deal
appointment
counsel
later
levels
discretionary
review
either
higher
state
courts
noted
equal
justice
kind
appeal
man
enjoys
depends
amount
money
chief
judge
haynsworth
find
logical
basis
differentiation
appeals
right
permissive
review
procedures
context
constitution
right
counsel
familiar
functioning
north
carolina
criminal
justice
system
concluded
context
constitutional
questions
arising
criminal
prosecutions
permissive
review
state
highest
may
predictably
meaningful
review
conviction
receive
ibid
north
carolina
appeals
example
constrained
diverging
earlier
opinion
state
even
subsequent
developments
rendered
earlier
decision
suspect
state
highest
remains
ultimate
arbiter
rights
citizens
ibid
chief
judge
haynsworth
also
correctly
observed
indigent
defendant
proceeding
without
counsel
substantial
disadvantage
relative
wealthy
defendants
represented
counsel
forced
fend
seeking
discretionary
review
state
may
well
enough
allege
error
courts
layman
terms
sophisticated
approach
may
demanded
indigent
defendant
much
need
assistance
lawyer
preparing
filing
petition
certiorari
handling
appeal
right
many
appeals
articulate
defendant
file
effective
brief
telling
story
simple
language
without
legalisms
technical
requirements
applications
writs
certiorari
hazards
one
untrained
law
hardly
expected
negotiate
certiorari
proceedings
constitute
highly
specialized
aspect
appellate
work
factors
deems
important
connection
deciding
whether
grant
certiorari
certainly
within
normal
knowledge
indigent
appellant
boskey
right
counsel
appellate
proceedings
rev
omitted
douglas
california
grounded
concepts
fairness
equality
right
seek
discretionary
review
substantial
one
one
lawyer
significant
assistance
indigent
defendant
correctly
perceived
concepts
fairness
equality
require
counsel
first
appeal
right
require
counsel
subsequent
discretionary
appeals
indigent
defendant
proceeding
without
assistance
counsel
attempting
satisfy
one
three
statutory
standards
review
seeking
certiorari
north
carolina
subject
matter
appeal
significant
public
interest
cause
involves
legal
principles
major
significance
jurisprudence
state
decision
appeals
appears
likely
conflict
decision
stat
rule
provides
guidelines
exercise
certiorari
jurisdiction
including
decisions
state
federal
questions
previously
decided
may
enough
simply
assert
error
decision
cf
magnum
import
coty
moreover
greatly
aided
briefs
prepared
accuracy
brevity
clarity
determination
whether
certiorari
granted
see
furness
withy
insurance