martin
linen
supply
argued
february
decided
april
deadlocked
jury
discharged
unable
agree
upon
verdict
criminal
contempt
trial
respondent
corporations
district
judge
granted
respondents
timely
motions
judgments
acquittal
fed
rule
crim
proc
provides
motion
judgment
acquittal
may
made
within
days
jury
discharged
may
enter
judgment
acquittal
government
appealed
pursuant
allows
appeal
criminal
case
appeals
judgment
district
dismissing
indictment
except
appeal
shall
lie
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
prohibits
prosecution
appeals
dismissed
appeal
held
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
appellate
review
retrial
following
judgment
acquittal
entered
rule
pp
controlling
constitutional
principle
double
jeopardy
clause
focuses
prohibitions
multiple
trials
wilson
appeal
government
presents
threat
successive
prosecutions
clause
offended
pp
normal
policy
granting
government
right
retry
defendant
mistrial
determine
outcome
trial
apply
since
valid
judgments
acquittal
entered
express
authority
strict
compliance
rule
successful
governmental
appeal
reversing
judgments
acquittal
necessitate
another
trial
proceedings
resolve
factual
issues
going
elements
offense
charged
pp
judgments
acquittal
acquittals
substance
well
form
since
district
plainly
granted
rule
motion
express
view
government
proved
facts
constituting
criminal
contempt
pp
rule
recognizes
legal
distinction
judge
jury
respect
invocation
protections
double
jeopardy
clause
rule
contemplated
artificial
distinctions
situations
judge
enters
judgment
acquittal
prior
submission
case
jury
rule
submission
prior
jury
return
verdict
rule
jury
thereafter
discharged
situation
involved
judge
chose
await
outcome
jury
deliberations
upon
failure
reach
verdict
acted
timely
motion
acquittal
jury
discharge
sanford
distinguished
pp
brennan
delivered
opinion
stewart
white
marshall
blackmun
powell
joined
stevens
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
post
burger
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
rehnquist
took
part
consideration
decision
case
frank
easterbrook
argued
cause
pro
hac
vice
brief
solicitor
general
bork
burleson
smith
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondents
justice
brennan
delivered
opinion
hopelessly
deadlocked
jury
discharged
unable
agree
upon
verdict
criminal
contempt
trial
respondent
corporations
district
western
district
texas
federal
rule
crim
proc
provides
case
motion
judgment
acquittal
may
made
within
days
jury
discharged
may
enter
judgment
acquittal
timely
motions
judgments
acquittal
rule
made
respondents
six
days
discharge
jury
resulted
two
months
later
entry
district
judgments
acquittal
sole
question
presented
decision
whether
judgments
acquittal
rule
appealable
pursuant
section
provides
appeal
criminal
case
shall
lie
appeals
judgment
district
dismissing
indictment
except
appeal
shall
lie
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
prohibits
prosecution
appeals
fifth
circuit
held
appeal
lay
judgments
acquittal
entered
district
rule
appeals
reasoned
since
reversal
acquittals
enable
try
respondents
second
time
bar
double
jeopardy
clause
leads
inescapably
conclusion
appeal
lies
directed
verdict
ordered
granted
certiorari
affirm
long
established
appeal
criminal
case
without
express
congressional
authorization
wilson
sanges
two
terms
ago
wilson
traced
uneven
course
statutory
authority
congress
amended
criminal
appeals
act
history
need
repeated
see
also
sisson
suffices
present
purposes
wilson
found
enacting
title
iii
omnibus
crime
control
act
stat
congress
intended
remove
statutory
barriers
government
appeals
allow
appeals
whenever
constitution
permit
therefore
unless
barred
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
appeals
government
judgments
acquittal
entered
district
rule
authorized
consideration
reach
constitutional
limitations
inhibiting
governmental
appeals
largely
unnecessary
prior
regime
statutory
restrictions
see
fong
foo
kepner
however
congress
removed
statutory
limitations
appeal
relevant
inquiry
turns
reach
double
jeopardy
clause
become
necessary
take
closer
look
policies
underlying
clause
order
determine
precisely
boundaries
government
appeal
rights
criminal
cases
wilson
supra
cases
decided
since
taken
closer
look
many
policies
shaping
restrictions
governmental
appeal
rights
brought
sharper
focus
development
double
jeopardy
clause
origins
suggests
directed
threat
multiple
prosecutions
government
appeals
least
appeals
require
new
trial
thus
wilson
held
controlling
constitutional
principle
focuses
prohibitions
multiple
trials
heart
policy
concern
permitting
sovereign
freely
subject
citizen
second
trial
offense
arm
government
potent
instrument
oppression
clause
therefore
guarantees
state
shall
permitted
make
repeated
attempts
convict
accused
thereby
subjecting
embarrassment
expense
ordeal
compelling
live
continuing
state
anxiety
insecurity
well
enhancing
possibility
even
though
innocent
may
found
guilty
green
see
also
downum
ociety
awareness
heavy
personal
strain
criminal
trial
represents
individual
defendant
manifested
willingness
limit
government
single
criminal
proceeding
vindicate
vital
interest
enforcement
criminal
laws
jorn
harlan
ii
none
considerations
favoring
appealability
present
case
government
appeal
district
judgments
acquittal
rule
jury
failed
agree
verdict
normal
policy
granting
government
right
retry
defendant
mistrial
determine
outcome
trial
perez
wheat
applicable
since
valid
judgments
acquittal
entered
express
authority
strictly
compliance
rule
judgments
according
wording
rule
act
terminate
trial
jeopardy
long
since
attached
successful
governmental
appeal
reversing
judgments
acquittal
necessitate
another
trial
least
proceedings
sort
devoted
resolution
factual
issues
going
elements
offense
charged
jenkins
therefore
present
case
one
double
jeopardy
bar
appealability
automatically
averted
rather
must
inquire
constitutional
significance
rule
acquittal
perhaps
fundamental
rule
history
double
jeopardy
jurisprudence
verdict
acquittal
reviewed
error
otherwise
without
putting
defendant
twice
jeopardy
thereby
violating
constitution
ball
fong
foo
supra
example
district
directed
jury
verdicts
acquittal
subsequently
entered
formal
judgments
acquittal
appeals
entertained
appeal
reversed
district
ruling
ground
trial
judge
without
power
direct
acquittals
circumstances
disclosed
record
reversed
holding
although
appeals
may
correctly
believed
acquittal
based
upon
egregiously
erroneous
foundation
evertheless
verdict
acquittal
final
reviewed
without
putting
defendants
twice
jeopardy
thereby
violating
constitution
see
also
kepner
supra
sisson
serfass
supra
applying
teaching
ball
fong
foo
like
cases
emphasized
constitutes
acquittal
controlled
form
judge
action
sisson
supra
cf
wilson
rather
must
determine
whether
ruling
judge
whatever
label
actually
represents
resolution
correct
factual
elements
offense
charged
question
judgments
acquittal
entered
district
acquittals
substance
well
form
district
plainly
granted
rule
motion
view
government
proved
facts
constituting
criminal
contempt
made
clear
belief
prosecution
weakest
contempt
case
ever
seen
entering
judgments
acquittal
also
recorded
view
government
failed
prove
material
allegations
beyond
reasonable
doubt
defendant
found
guilty
thus
plain
district
case
evaluated
government
evidence
determined
legally
insufficient
sustain
conviction
appeals
concluded
determination
insufficiency
evidence
triggered
double
jeopardy
protection
government
however
disputes
constitutional
significance
district
action
submits
verdict
acquittal
formally
returned
jury
absolutely
bar
proceedings
nce
district
declared
mistrial
dismissed
jury
double
jeopardy
bar
second
trial
dissolved
brief
agree
course
government
argues
jury
trial
primary
finders
fact
jurors
overriding
responsibility
stand
accused
potentially
arbitrary
abusive
government
command
criminal
sanction
reason
trial
judge
prohibited
entering
judgment
conviction
directing
jury
come
forward
verdict
see
sparf
hansen
carpenters
regardless
overwhelmingly
evidence
may
point
direction
trial
judge
thereby
barred
attempting
override
interfere
jurors
independent
judgment
manner
contrary
interests
accused
limitation
role
trial
judge
however
never
inhibited
ruling
favor
criminal
defendant
fong
foo
establishing
binding
nature
directed
verdict
dispositive
point
since
rule
merely
replaces
mechanism
employed
fong
foo
accords
federal
trial
judge
greater
flexibility
timing
judgment
acquittal
persuasive
basis
exists
construing
rule
weakening
trial
binding
authority
purposes
double
jeopardy
rather
notes
advisory
committee
confirmed
rule
intends
substantive
alteration
role
judge
jury
creates
purely
formal
modification
device
order
make
nomenclature
accord
realities
accordingly
sisson
supra
held
rule
recognizes
legal
distinction
judge
jury
respect
invocation
protections
double
jeopardy
clause
government
however
read
fong
foo
implication
rule
differently
argues
judge
directed
verdict
fong
foo
binding
double
jeopardy
purposes
formal
verdict
acquittal
though
direction
rendered
judge
jury
discharged
effect
turns
constitutional
significance
rule
judgment
acquittal
matter
timing
thus
judge
orders
entry
judgment
acquittal
defendant
motion
prior
submission
case
jury
may
rule
submission
prior
jury
return
verdict
authorized
rule
jury
thereafter
discharged
government
argument
necessarily
concedes
double
jeopardy
clause
preclude
appeal
retrial
however
judge
chooses
await
outcome
jury
deliberations
upon
failure
reach
verdict
acts
timely
motion
acquittal
filed
rule
within
seven
days
discharge
government
submits
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
appeal
persuaded
rule
contemplated
artificial
distinctions
rather
differentiations
timing
intentionally
incorporated
rule
afford
trial
judge
maximum
opportunity
consider
care
pending
acquittal
motion
insofar
government
desires
appeal
correct
error
irrational
behavior
prejudice
part
trial
judge
interest
dependent
point
trial
judge
enters
rule
judgment
suffers
special
prejudice
judge
acquittal
jury
disagrees
discharged
extent
judge
authority
rule
designed
provide
additional
protection
defendant
filtering
deficient
prosecutions
defendant
interest
protection
essentially
identical
jury
allowed
come
verdict
jury
unable
reach
verdict
either
case
defendant
neither
condemned
exculpated
panel
peers
absence
intervention
trial
judge
vindication
must
await
action
jury
thus
conclude
judgments
rule
treated
uniformly
accordingly
double
jeopardy
clause
bars
appeal
acquittal
entered
rule
jury
mistrial
less
rule
sanford
dictate
contrary
result
sanford
jury
trial
ended
declaration
mistrial
judgment
acquittal
never
entered
four
months
later
second
trial
well
preparatory
stage
trial
dismissed
prosecution
indictment
dismissal
occurred
several
months
first
trial
ended
mistrial
retrial
respondents
begun
characterized
judge
dismissal
pretrial
order
concluded
appealability
governed
serfass
linking
sanford
serfass
highlights
distinctiveness
acquittal
rule
serfass
carefully
distinguished
appeal
pretrial
order
appeal
legal
determination
basis
facts
adduced
trial
relating
general
issue
case
quoting
sisson
rule
acquittal
however
falls
squarely
within
latter
category
language
rule
judgment
acquittal
plainly
concludes
pending
prosecution
jeopardy
attached
following
introduction
trial
evidence
general
issue
circumstance
hold
although
retrial
sometimes
permissible
mistrial
declared
verdict
judgment
entered
verdict
acquittal
foreclosed
retrial
thus
barred
appellate
review
wilson
affirmed
footnotes
rule
provides
motion
judgment
acquittal
motion
submission
jury
motions
directed
verdict
abolished
motions
judgment
acquittal
shall
used
place
motion
defendant
motion
shall
order
entry
judgment
acquittal
one
offenses
charged
indictment
information
evidence
either
side
closed
evidence
insufficient
sustain
conviction
offense
offenses
defendant
motion
judgment
acquittal
close
evidence
offered
government
granted
defendant
may
offer
evidence
without
reserved
right
reservation
decision
motion
motion
judgment
acquittal
made
close
evidence
may
reserve
decision
motion
submit
case
jury
decide
motion
either
jury
returns
verdict
returns
verdict
guilty
discharged
without
returned
verdict
motion
discharge
jury
jury
returns
verdict
guilty
discharged
without
returned
verdict
motion
judgment
acquittal
may
made
renewed
within
days
jury
discharged
within
time
may
fix
period
verdict
guilty
returned
may
motion
set
aside
verdict
enter
judgment
acquittal
verdict
returned
may
enter
judgment
acquittal
shall
necessary
making
motion
similar
motion
made
prior
submission
case
jury
dismissal
jury
district
judge
advised
counsel
parties
inclined
enter
judgment
acquittal
respondents
appropriate
motion
made
app
said
almost
instructed
verdict
defendants
government
case
without
doubt
weakest
contempt
case
ever
seen
pertinent
part
provides
appeal
criminal
case
appeal
shall
lie
appeals
decision
judgment
order
district
dismissing
indictment
information
one
counts
except
appeal
shall
lie
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
prohibits
prosecution
although
provision
authorizes
appeal
district
dismiss
al
rather
acquittal
established
form
ruling
dispositive
appealability
statutory
sense
see
infra
characterizing
trial
action
directed
verdict
appeals
erred
terminology
rule
expressly
substitutes
judgment
acquittal
directed
verdict
shall
seen
however
see
infra
purely
formal
nature
change
federal
criminal
procedure
marked
rule
speaks
strongly
favor
treating
rule
judgments
acquittal
predecessor
directed
verdicts
purposes
invoking
double
jeopardy
see
fong
foo
double
jeopardy
clause
also
accords
nonappealable
finality
verdict
guilty
entered
judge
jury
disabling
government
seeking
punish
defendant
offense
see
ex
parte
lange
wall
absence
threatened
second
trial
mitigates
possibility
governmental
jury
shopping
substantially
reduces
expense
anxiety
borne
defendant
addition
government
interest
preserving
conviction
fairly
attained
obviously
far
greater
interest
investing
additional
time
resources
reprosecuting
defendant
following
jury
failure
reach
verdict
trial
judgment
acquittal
motion
rule
judgment
acquittal
entertained
earliest
evidence
either
side
closed
stage
trial
obviously
arises
well
jeopardy
attached
must
inquire
whether
ruling
defendant
favor
actually
acquittal
even
though
district
characterized
otherwise
wilson
rule
terms
authorizes
judgment
acquittal
evidence
insufficient
sustain
conviction
offense
offenses
appeals
specifically
address
issue
reached
conclusion
suarez
per
curiam
situation
criminal
prosecution
tried
judge
alone
question
double
jeopardy
clause
accords
determination
favor
defendant
full
constitutional
effect
see
jenkins
even
though
proposed
government
respect
rule
judgment
acquittal
argued
prosecution
legitimate
interest
correcting
possibility
error
judge
sitting
without
jury
jenkins
refused
accept
theories
double
jeopardy
permit
reconsideration
trial
judge
ruling
discharging
criminal
defendant
advisory
committee
framed
rule
explicitly
noted
subdivision
permitting
entry
judgment
acquittal
jury
discharge
works
undue
prejudice
government
prosecution
constitutionally
sanctioned
interest
receiving
verdict
jury
constitutional
requirement
jury
trial
criminal
cases
primarily
right
accorded
defendant
cf
singer
government
right
demand
jury
verdict
limited
afforded
fed
rule
crim
proc
jury
trial
waivable
consent
government
course
qualified
authority
granted
trial
judge
rule
justice
stevens
concurring
judgment
statutory
authority
government
appeal
judgment
acquittal
criminal
case
plain
language
together
unambiguous
legislative
history
makes
perfectly
clear
congress
authorize
intend
authorize
appeals
acquittals
prior
recent
amendment
criminal
appeals
act
source
great
confusion
unruly
child
improved
age
sisson
act
construed
incorporate
obscure
distinctions
various
types
dismissals
appealable
directly
appeals
appealed
either
however
one
thing
always
clear
appeal
taken
government
acquittal
matter
erroneous
legal
theory
underlying
decision
amendment
changed
law
eliminating
distinctions
different
kinds
dismissals
neither
present
statute
predecessors
ever
authorized
appeal
acquittal
statute
relevant
part
reads
criminal
case
appeal
shall
lie
appeals
decision
judgment
order
district
dismissing
indictment
information
one
counts
except
appeal
shall
lie
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
prohibits
prosecution
emphasis
added
legislative
history
demonstrates
congress
intended
eliminate
nonconstitutional
barriers
appeals
dismissals
intend
allow
appeals
acquittals
recognized
senate
report
key
legislative
history
report
opens
describing
purpose
bill
resolve
serious
problems
frequently
arisen
respect
right
appeal
rulings
terminate
prosecutions
judgments
acquittal
emphasis
added
apart
problem
direct
review
report
major
problem
arisen
present
statute
concerns
total
lack
appealability
certain
kinds
dismissals
suppressions
emphasis
added
report
discusses
length
limitations
appeals
dismissals
committee
believed
constitution
allowed
government
appeal
dismissal
stated
bill
intended
liberally
construed
effectuate
purpose
permitting
government
appeal
dismissals
criminal
prosecutions
district
courts
cases
constitution
permits
emphasis
added
hand
committee
believed
constitution
barred
appeal
acquittal
dismissal
amounting
acquittal
true
acquittal
based
upon
insufficiency
evidence
prove
element
offense
understanding
demonstrated
bill
sponsor
presented
senate
report
floor
summarized
bill
providing
government
right
appeal
ruling
district
criminal
case
dismisses
prosecution
favor
defendant
except
ruling
acquittal
also
presented
letter
solicitor
general
explaining
bill
allow
appeal
dismissal
except
one
amounting
judgment
acquittal
factual
judgment
defendant
guilty
crime
charged
thereby
entitled
protection
double
jeopardy
cong
rec
remarks
hruska
explained
wilson
conference
committee
made
minor
change
wording
bill
see
wilson
change
narrowed
bill
two
respects
senate
bill
allowed
appeals
dismissals
also
order
terminating
prosecution
favor
defendant
expressly
barred
appeals
judgment
acquittal
short
conference
committee
stated
senate
bill
authorized
appeal
decision
order
terminating
prosecution
except
acquittal
conf
conference
committee
change
narrowed
bill
deleting
reference
orders
terminating
prosecution
favor
defendant
leaving
dismissals
appealable
deletion
rendered
superfluous
exception
acquittals
also
deleted
committee
change
also
narrowed
bill
barring
appeal
even
dismissal
prosecution
violate
double
jeopardy
attempt
authorize
government
appeal
acquittals
represented
radical
change
law
sponsor
bill
apparently
understand
legislation
effects
described
noncontroversial
legislation
away
unnecessary
perplexing
jurisdictional
problems
appeals
government
criminal
cases
cong
rec
remarks
hruska
similarly
conference
report
describes
senate
bill
merely
eliminating
echnical
distinctions
appeals
conf
supra
interpreting
legislative
history
sometimes
perplexing
uncertain
task
instance
however
legislative
history
absolutely
clear
congress
interested
solely
expanding
government
right
appeal
dismissal
indictment
desire
allow
appeals
acquittals
believed
appeals
unconstitutional
since
satisfied
congress
authorized
government
appeal
judgment
acquittal
question
presented
whether
judgment
entered
case
answer
question
demonstrates
perfectly
clear
virtue
fed
rule
crim
proc
mistrial
terminate
judge
power
make
decision
merits
ruling
substance
well
form
therefore
acquittal
reason
concur
judgment
contrary
dictum
wilson
jenkins
serfass
controlling
reasons
first
statutory
issue
dispute
cases
two
defendants
expressly
conceded
applicability
statute
cases
brief
respondent
wilson
brief
respondent
jenkins
third
defendant
simply
failed
address
statutory
issue
see
brief
petitioner
serfass
probably
case
involved
pretrial
dismissal
indictment
hence
unaided
adversary
presentation
issue
moreover
language
used
decisions
undermine
holdings
two
cases
upheld
government
appeal
clearly
involve
acquittals
merits
serfass
pretrial
dismissal
wilson
dismissal
speedy
trial
grounds
third
case
jenkins
arguably
involved
acquittal
held
constitutional
grounds
appeal
barred
second
indicate
text
infra
perfectly
clear
dictum
incorrect
view
special
responsibility
supervising
proper
functioning
federal
criminal
justice
system
hesitate
correct
plain
mistake
involving
technical
problem
procedure
prejudicial
reliance
mistake
difficulty
problems
presented
statute
illustrated
sharply
divided
conclusions
reached
various
opinions
cases
sisson
ponto
en
banc
apex
distributing
en
banc
significance
senate
report
understanding
act
well
expressed
serfass
supra
relevance
significance
well
considered
carefully
prepared
report
senate
judiciary
committee
see
schwegmann
calvert
distillers
jackson
concurring
affected
fact
amendments
proposed
committee
adopted
without
change
senate
modified
conference
committee
see
conf
latter
report
contains
explanation
changes
made
changes
consistent
intent
expressed
senate
report
see
wilson
ante
subsection
entitled
nature
district
decision
limitation
appeals
dismissals
begins
statement
terminology
employed
original
statute
unnecessarily
precludes
government
appealing
many
dismissals
prosecutions
report
current
act
provide
appeal
large
variety
cases
dismissal
based
grounds
nothing
defect
indictment
construction
invalidity
underlying
statute
ibid
report
gives
examples
dismissals
failure
prosecution
comply
discovery
lack
timely
prosecution
report
refers
use
old
terms
like
judgment
sustaining
motion
bar
giving
rise
problems
like
confronted
sisson
supra
subpart
senate
report
deals
attachment
jeopardy
limitation
appeals
dismissals
section
concerned
appeal
decision
sustaining
motion
bar
jeopardy
attached
ibid
congress
concerned
defendant
reserve
issues
law
trial
preclude
possible
review
example
case
trial
judge
ruled
selective
service
act
unconstitutional
trial
bill
provided
appeal
lie
decision
judgment
order
district
dismissing
indictment
information
terminating
prosecution
favor
defendant
one
counts
except
appeal
shall
lie
judgment
acquittal
conference
bill
reported
back
houses
provision
appeals
described
cautious
terms
hardly
appropriate
proposal
go
constitutional
limits
senate
authoriz
ing
appeals
certain
classes
criminal
cases
cong
rec
remarks
mcclellan
emphasis
added
house
amendment
broaden
clarify
right
government
appeal
dismissals
criminal
cases
remarks
celler
pointed
sanford
mistrial
case
entirely
different
proceedings
trial
terminated
without
decision
merits
trial
respondents
indictment
terminated
favor
mistrial
declared
sua
sponte
district
trial
terminated
manner
classical
test
determining
whether
defendants
may
retried
without
violating
double
jeopardy
clause
stated
justice
story
opinion
perez
wheat
opinion
facts
constitute
legal
bar
future
trial
prisoner
convicted
acquitted
may
put
upon
defense
chief
justice
burger
dissenting
order
acquittal
favor
respondents
entered
district
judge
mistrial
declared
due
jury
deadlock
jury
dismissed
respondents
ceased
jeopardy
proceeding
longer
convicted
except
undergoing
new
trial
century
half
accepted
defendant
may
properly
reprosecuted
declaration
mistrial
perez
wheat
therefore
district
judge
ruling
made
prior
trial
government
right
prosecute
defendant
required
defend
sanford
present
case
distinguished
sanford
constitutionally
material
respects
true
district
judge
phrased
order
acquittal
rather
dismissal
order
entered
pursuant
timely
rule
motion
however
mechanical
niceties
dispositive
whether
retrial
expose
defendants
double
jeopardy
fifth
amendment
inquiry
focus
substance
rather
form
proceedings
ruling
motion
acquittal
district
judge
must
pass
sufficiency
weight
government
case
isaacs
cert
denied
wooten
applicable
standard
whether
district
judge
trier
fact
whether
find
accused
guilty
government
evidence
consolidated
laundries
emphasis
original
district
judge
ruling
thus
plainly
one
law
fact
exonerate
convict
defendant
legitimate
interest
defendant
requires
ruling
insulated
appellate
review
hand
barring
appeal
jeopardizes
government
substantial
interest
presenting
legally
sufficient
case
jury
holding
today
thus
wholly
inconsistent
intent
rule
described
drafters
advisory
committee
notes
explaining
amendments
rule
notes
expressly
state
legitimate
interest
government
intended
prejudiced
permitting
direct
acquittal
motion
surely
right
reprosecute
legitimate
interest
government
remain
unaffected
district
judge
order
acquittal
interest
clarity
consistency
administration
criminal
justice
system
served
today
holding
hinging
outcome
case
timing
motion
label
order
elevating
form
substance
undermining
theoretical
framework
established
trilogy
two
terms
ago
sanford
morrison
decisions
earlier
term
litigants
criminal
courts
government
defendants
alike
harmed
uncertainty
thus
created
reasons
join
holding
respectfully
dissent
fong
foo
relies
heavily
point
district
judge
directed
verdict
original
trial
still
progress
unlike
case
us
jury
still
properly
empaneled
yet
even
begun
deliberate
district
judge
interrupts
trial
process
important
rights
defendant
may
jeopardized
opportunity
try
case
frustrated
possibility
acquittal
originally
empaneled
jury
lost
rights
implicated
original
trial
ended
jury
agree
point
defendant
already
subject
second
trial
thus
timing
district
order
suggests
irrelevant
technicality
midtrial
judgment
acquittal
interrupts
trial
process
time
defendant
constitutionally
entitled
proceed
verdict
wilson
jenkins
serfass