evitts
lucey
argued
october
decided
january
respondent
convicted
drug
offense
kentucky
state
retained
counsel
filed
timely
notice
appeal
kentucky
appeals
counsel
failed
file
statement
appeal
required
kentucky
rule
appellate
procedure
filed
brief
record
appeal
appeals
dismissed
appeal
later
denied
motion
reconsideration
kentucky
affirmed
trial
denied
motion
vacate
conviction
grant
belated
appeal
respondent
sought
habeas
corpus
relief
federal
district
challenging
dismissal
appeal
ground
deprived
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
guaranteed
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
district
granted
conditional
writ
habeas
corpus
ordering
respondent
release
unless
commonwealth
either
reinstated
appeal
retried
appeals
affirmed
held
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
guarantees
criminal
defendant
effective
assistance
counsel
first
appeal
right
pp
nominal
representation
appeal
right
like
nominal
representation
trial
suffice
render
proceedings
constitutionally
adequate
party
whose
counsel
unable
provide
effective
representation
better
position
one
counsel
first
appeal
right
therefore
adjudicated
accord
due
process
law
appellant
effective
assistance
attorney
promise
douglas
california
criminal
defendant
right
counsel
first
appeal
right
like
promise
gideon
wainwright
criminal
defendant
right
counsel
trial
futile
gesture
unless
comprehended
right
effective
assistance
counsel
pp
state
opts
act
field
action
significant
discretionary
elements
establishes
system
appeals
right
although
required
must
nonetheless
act
accord
dictates
constitution
particular
accord
due
process
clause
pp
reasonable
interpretation
line
drawn
ross
moffitt
discretionary
appeals
criminal
defendant
right
counsel
appeals
right
criminal
defendant
appeal
conviction
kentucky
appeals
appeal
right
kentucky
constitution
requires
least
one
appeal
right
allowed
cases
civil
criminal
criminal
defendant
appealing
kentucky
appeals
previously
adequate
opportunity
present
claims
fairly
context
state
appellate
process
follows
purposes
analysis
due
process
clause
respondent
appeal
appeal
right
thus
triggering
right
counsel
recognized
douglas
california
supra
pp
petitioners
argument
due
process
clause
bearing
commonwealth
actions
case
constitutional
requirements
recognized
griffin
illinois
transcript
trial
prerequisite
decision
merits
appeal
douglas
california
supra
cases
followed
source
equal
protection
clause
due
process
clause
rests
misunderstanding
diverse
sources
holdings
area
law
due
process
equal
protection
concerns
implicated
griffin
douglas
clauses
supported
decisions
pp
brennan
delivered
opinion
white
marshall
blackmun
powell
stevens
joined
burger
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
rehnquist
filed
dissenting
opinion
burger
joined
post
gerald
henry
assistant
attorney
general
kentucky
argued
cause
petitioners
briefs
david
armstrong
attorney
general
paul
reilender
assistant
attorney
general
william
radigan
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
justice
brennan
delivered
opinion
douglas
california
held
fourteenth
amendment
guarantees
criminal
defendant
right
counsel
first
appeal
right
case
must
decide
whether
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
guarantees
criminal
defendant
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
march
kentucky
jury
found
respondent
guilty
trafficking
controlled
substances
retained
counsel
filed
timely
notice
appeal
appeals
kentucky
state
intermediate
appellate
kentucky
rule
appellate
procedure
required
appellants
serve
appellate
record
appeal
statement
appeal
contain
names
appellants
appellees
counsel
trial
judge
date
judgment
date
notice
appeal
additional
information
see
england
spalding
rule
designed
assist
processing
records
compliance
jurisdictional
respondent
counsel
failed
file
statement
appeal
filed
brief
record
appeal
september
commonwealth
filed
brief
included
motion
dismiss
appeal
failure
file
statement
appeal
appeals
granted
motion
appellant
failed
supply
information
required
rap
app
respondent
moved
reconsideration
arguing
information
necessary
statement
appeal
fact
included
brief
albeit
somewhat
different
format
time
respondent
tendered
statement
appeal
formally
complied
commonwealth
rules
appeals
summarily
denied
motion
reconsideration
respondent
sought
discretionary
review
kentucky
judgment
appeals
affirmed
order
final
effort
gain
state
appellate
review
conviction
respondent
moved
trial
vacate
judgment
grant
belated
appeal
trial
denied
motion
respondent
sought
federal
habeas
corpus
relief
district
eastern
district
kentucky
challenged
constitutionality
commonwealth
dismissal
appeal
lawyer
failure
file
statement
appeal
ground
dismissal
deprived
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
guaranteed
fourteenth
amendment
district
granted
respondent
conditional
writ
habeas
corpus
ordering
release
unless
commonwealth
either
reinstated
appeal
retired
commonwealth
appealed
appeals
sixth
circuit
reached
decision
merits
instead
remanded
case
district
determination
whether
respondent
claim
equal
protection
clause
lucey
seabold
remand
counsel
parties
stipulated
equal
protection
issue
case
issue
whether
state
action
dismissing
respondent
appeal
violated
due
process
clause
district
thereupon
reissued
conditional
writ
habeas
corpus
january
appeals
sixth
circuit
affirmed
judgment
district
lucey
kavanaugh
granted
petition
certiorari
affirm
ii
respondent
past
seven
years
unsuccessfully
pursued
every
avenue
open
effort
obtain
decision
merits
appeal
prove
conviction
unlawful
kentucky
appellate
courts
refusal
hear
merits
claim
stem
view
merits
respondent
argue
courts
constitutionally
required
render
judgment
appeal
favor
rather
issue
must
decide
whether
state
dismissal
appeal
despite
ineffective
assistance
respondent
counsel
appeal
violates
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
analyzing
merits
respondent
contention
appropriate
emphasize
two
limits
scope
question
presented
first
challenge
district
finding
respondent
indeed
received
ineffective
assistance
counsel
appeal
respondent
alleges
petitioners
deny
counsel
failure
obey
simple
rule
drastic
consequences
required
finding
therefore
need
decide
content
appropriate
standards
judging
claims
ineffective
assistance
appellate
counsel
cf
strickland
washington
cronic
second
stipulation
district
remand
limits
inquiry
solely
validity
state
action
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
respondent
claim
arises
intersection
two
lines
cases
one
line
held
fourteenth
amendment
guarantees
criminal
appellant
pursuing
first
appeal
right
certain
minimum
safeguards
necessary
make
appeal
adequate
effective
see
griffin
illinois
among
safeguards
right
counsel
see
douglas
california
second
line
held
right
counsel
created
sixth
amendment
applied
fourteenth
amendment
see
gideon
wainwright
comprehends
right
effective
assistance
counsel
see
cuyler
sullivan
question
presented
case
whether
right
counsel
also
comprehends
right
effective
assistance
counsel
almost
century
ago
held
constitution
require
grant
appeals
right
criminal
defendants
seeking
review
alleged
trial
errors
mckane
durston
nonetheless
state
created
appellate
courts
integral
part
system
finally
adjudicating
guilt
innocence
defendant
griffin
illinois
procedures
used
deciding
appeals
must
comport
demands
due
process
equal
protection
clauses
constitution
griffin
transcript
trial
proceedings
prerequisite
decision
merits
appeal
see
held
state
must
provide
transcript
indigent
criminal
appellants
afford
buy
one
way
assure
adequate
effective
appeal
see
also
eskridge
washington
state
board
prison
terms
paroles
per
curiam
invalidating
state
rule
giving
free
transcripts
defendants
convince
trial
judge
justice
thereby
promoted
burns
ohio
invalidating
state
requirement
indigent
defendants
pay
fee
filing
notice
appeal
conviction
lane
brown
invalidating
procedure
whereby
meaningful
appeal
possible
public
defender
requested
transcript
draper
washington
invalidating
state
procedure
providing
free
transcript
defendant
satisfy
trial
judge
appeal
frivolous
transcript
may
rule
custom
prerequisite
appellate
review
services
lawyer
virtually
every
layman
necessary
present
appeal
form
suitable
appellate
consideration
merits
see
griffin
supra
therefore
douglas
california
supra
recognized
principles
griffin
required
state
afforded
right
appeal
make
appeal
meaningless
ritual
supplying
indigent
appellant
criminal
case
attorney
right
counsel
limited
first
appeal
right
see
ross
moffitt
attorney
need
advance
every
argument
regardless
merit
urged
appellant
see
jones
barnes
attorney
must
available
assist
preparing
submitting
brief
appellate
swenson
bosler
per
curiam
must
play
role
active
advocate
rather
mere
friend
assisting
detached
evaluation
appellant
claim
see
anders
california
see
also
entsminger
iowa
gideon
wainwright
supra
held
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
fundamental
essential
fair
trial
due
process
law
made
obligatory
upon
fourteenth
amendment
quoting
betts
brady
see
also
powell
alabama
johnson
zerbst
gideon
rested
obvious
truth
lawyers
necessities
luxuries
adversarial
system
criminal
justice
premise
adversary
system
criminal
justice
partisan
advocacy
sides
case
best
promote
ultimate
objective
guilty
convicted
innocent
go
free
herring
new
york
defendant
liberty
depends
ability
present
case
face
intricacies
law
advocacy
public
prosecutor
ash
criminal
trial
thus
conducted
accord
due
process
law
unless
defendant
counsel
represent
made
clear
guarantee
counsel
satisfied
mere
formal
appointment
avery
alabama
person
happens
lawyer
present
trial
alongside
accused
however
enough
satisfy
constitutional
command
accused
entitled
assisted
attorney
whether
retained
appointed
plays
role
necessary
ensure
trial
fair
strickland
washington
see
also
mcmann
richardson
long
recognized
right
counsel
right
effective
assistance
counsel
cuyler
sullivan
last
term
emphasized
point
clarifying
standards
used
assessing
claims
trial
counsel
failed
provide
effective
representation
see
cronic
strickland
washington
supra
right
counsel
fundamental
fair
trial
constitution
tolerate
trials
counsel
though
present
name
unable
assist
defendant
obtain
fair
decision
merits
quotation
strickland
supra
makes
clear
constitutional
guarantee
effective
assistance
counsel
trial
applies
every
criminal
prosecution
without
regard
whether
counsel
retained
appointed
see
cuyler
sullivan
supra
constitutional
mandate
addressed
action
state
obtaining
criminal
conviction
procedure
fails
meet
standards
due
process
law
unless
defendant
charged
serious
offense
counsel
able
invoke
procedural
substantive
safeguards
distinguish
system
justice
serious
risk
injustice
infects
trial
state
obtains
criminal
conviction
trial
state
unconstitutionally
deprives
defendant
liberty
cuyler
sullivan
supra
citations
omitted
two
lines
cases
mentioned
cases
recognizing
right
counsel
first
appeal
right
cases
recognizing
right
counsel
trial
includes
right
effective
assistance
counsel
dispositive
respondent
claim
bringing
appeal
right
conviction
criminal
defendant
attempting
demonstrate
conviction
consequent
drastic
loss
liberty
unlawful
prosecute
appeal
criminal
appellant
must
face
adversary
proceeding
like
trial
governed
intricate
rules
layperson
hopelessly
forbidding
unrepresented
appellant
like
unrepresented
defendant
trial
unable
protect
vital
interests
stake
sure
respondent
nominal
representation
brought
appeal
nominal
representation
appeal
right
like
nominal
representation
trial
suffice
render
proceedings
constitutionally
adequate
party
whose
counsel
unable
provide
effective
representation
better
position
one
counsel
first
appeal
right
therefore
adjudicated
accord
due
process
law
appellant
effective
assistance
attorney
result
hardly
novel
petitioners
anders
california
entsminger
iowa
claimed
although
represented
name
counsel
received
type
assistance
constitutionally
required
render
appellate
proceedings
fair
cases
agreed
petitioners
holding
counsel
failure
anders
submit
brief
appeal
counsel
waiver
entsminger
petitioner
right
full
transcript
rendered
subsequent
judgments
petitioners
unconstitutional
short
promise
douglas
criminal
defendant
right
counsel
appeal
like
promise
gideon
criminal
defendant
right
counsel
trial
futile
gesture
unless
comprehended
right
effective
assistance
counsel
recognition
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
requires
affirm
sixth
circuit
decision
case
petitioners
object
holding
disable
state
courts
enforcing
wide
range
vital
procedural
rules
governing
appeals
counsel
may
according
petitioners
disobey
rules
impunity
state
courts
precluded
enforcing
dismissing
appeal
petitioners
concerns
exaggerated
lower
federal
courts
many
state
courts
overwhelmingly
recognized
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
decisions
seem
dire
consequences
ability
conduct
appeals
accordance
reasonable
procedural
rules
matter
longstanding
recognition
right
effective
assistance
counsel
trial
including
recognition
cuyler
sullivan
right
extended
retained
well
appointed
counsel
rendered
ineffectual
perhaps
complex
procedural
rules
governing
conduct
trials
see
also
cronic
strickland
washington
extent
state
believes
procedural
rules
jeopardy
numerous
courses
remain
open
example
state
may
certainly
enforce
vital
procedural
rule
imposing
sanctions
attorney
rather
client
course
may
well
effective
alternative
refusing
decide
merits
appeal
reduce
possibility
defendant
powerless
obey
rules
serve
term
years
jail
unlawful
conviction
instead
state
chooses
dismiss
appeal
incompetent
attorney
violated
local
rules
may
action
intrude
upon
client
due
process
rights
instance
kentucky
contexts
permitted
attack
trial
judgment
appropriate
remedy
frustrated
right
appeal
hammershoy
commonwealth
one
several
solutions
state
federal
courts
permitted
similar
cases
system
appeal
right
established
precisely
assure
validly
convicted
freedom
drastically
curtailed
state
may
extinguish
right
another
right
appellant
right
effective
assistance
counsel
violated
iii
petitioners
urge
reasoning
rests
faulty
premises
first
petitioners
argue
commonwealth
need
establish
system
appeals
right
first
instance
immune
constitutional
scrutiny
chooses
system
second
petitioners
deny
respondent
right
counsel
appeal
kentucky
appeals
appeal
conditional
appeal
rather
appeal
right
third
petitioners
argue
even
commonwealth
actions
subject
constitutional
scrutiny
even
appeal
sought
appeal
right
due
process
clause
upon
respondent
claimed
right
effective
assistance
counsel
based
bearing
commonwealth
actions
case
take
three
arguments
turn
support
first
argument
petitioners
initially
rely
mckane
durston
held
state
need
provide
system
appellate
review
right
see
also
ross
moffitt
jones
barnes
petitioners
derive
proposition
much
broader
principle
whatever
state
appeal
whether
appeal
operate
due
process
concern
constitution
brief
petitioners
follow
kentucky
action
cutting
respondent
appeal
attorney
incompetence
permissible
due
process
clause
right
appeal
unique
among
state
actions
withdrawn
without
consideration
applicable
due
process
norms
instance
although
state
may
choose
whether
institute
given
welfare
program
must
operate
whatever
programs
establish
subject
protections
due
process
clause
see
goldberg
kelly
similarly
state
great
discretion
setting
policies
governing
parole
decisions
must
nonetheless
make
decisions
accord
due
process
clause
see
morrissey
brewer
see
also
graham
richardson
bell
burson
sherbert
verner
joint
refugee
committee
mcgrath
frankfurter
concurring
short
state
opts
act
field
action
significant
discretionary
elements
must
nonetheless
act
accord
dictates
constitution
particular
accord
due
process
clause
petitioners
second
argument
relies
holding
ross
moffitt
supra
criminal
defendant
right
counsel
appeals
right
discretionary
state
appeals
according
petitioners
kentucky
courts
permit
criminal
appeals
condition
appellant
follow
local
rules
statutes
governing
appeals
see
brown
commonwealth
therefore
system
establish
appeal
right
conditional
appeal
subject
dismissal
state
rules
violated
petitioners
conclude
respondent
appeal
right
right
counsel
effective
assistance
counsel
conditional
appeal
reasonable
interpretation
line
drawn
ross
discretionary
appeals
appeals
right
criminal
defendant
appeal
conviction
kentucky
appeals
appeal
right
section
kentucky
constitution
provides
cases
civil
criminal
shall
allowed
matter
right
least
one
appeal
another
unlike
appellant
discretionary
appeal
ross
criminal
appellant
kentucky
appeals
typically
benefit
previously
prepared
trial
transcript
brief
merits
appeal
previous
written
opinion
see
ross
supra
addition
petitioners
fail
point
source
kentucky
law
indicating
decision
merits
appeal
like
respondent
unlike
discretionary
appeal
ross
contingent
discretionary
finding
appeals
case
involves
significant
public
jurisprudential
issues
purpose
first
appeal
kentucky
system
appears
precisely
determine
whether
individual
defendant
lawfully
convicted
short
criminal
defendant
bringing
appeal
kentucky
appeals
previously
adequate
opportunity
present
claims
fairly
context
state
appellate
process
see
follows
purposes
analysis
due
process
clause
respondent
appeal
appeal
right
thus
triggering
right
counsel
recognized
douglas
california
finally
petitioners
argue
even
due
process
clause
apply
manner
state
conducts
system
appeals
even
appeal
denied
respondent
appeal
right
due
process
clause
nonetheless
offended
kentucky
refusal
decide
respondent
appeal
merits
clause
role
play
granting
criminal
appellant
right
counsel
fortiori
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
although
may
seem
douglas
progeny
defeat
argument
petitioners
attempt
distinguish
cases
exploiting
seeming
ambiguity
previous
decisions
according
petitioners
constitutional
requirements
recognized
griffin
douglas
cases
followed
source
equal
protection
clause
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
support
contention
petitioners
point
cases
griffin
line
involved
claims
indigent
defendants
right
decision
merits
appeal
wealthier
defendants
able
afford
lawyers
transcripts
prerequisites
fair
adjudication
merits
petitioners
claim
cases
understood
equal
protection
cases
challenging
constitutional
validity
distinction
made
rich
poor
criminal
defendants
petitioners
conclude
due
process
clause
permits
criminal
appeals
right
forfeited
appellant
transcript
attorney
surely
permits
appeals
forfeited
appellant
attorney
unable
assist
prosecuting
appeal
petitioners
argument
rests
misunderstanding
diverse
sources
holdings
area
ross
moffitt
held
precise
rationale
griffin
douglas
lines
cases
never
explicitly
stated
support
derived
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
clause
amendment
accord
bearden
georgia
due
process
equal
protection
principles
converge
analysis
cases
see
also
note
term
harv
rev
citing
cases
rather
clear
statement
ross
due
process
clause
played
significant
role
prior
decisions
well
supported
cases
griffin
instance
state
effect
dismissed
petitioner
appeal
afford
transcript
establishing
system
appeal
right
state
implicitly
determined
unwilling
curtail
drastically
defendant
liberty
unless
second
judicial
decisionmaker
appellate
convinced
conviction
accord
law
decided
determination
important
made
appeal
final
step
adjudication
guilt
innocence
individual
see
griffin
state
effect
make
available
wealthy
disposition
violated
equal
protection
principles
distinguished
poor
rich
respect
vital
right
also
violated
due
process
principles
decided
appeal
way
arbitrary
respect
issues
involved
griffin
noted
dispensing
justice
trial
level
charging
defendant
privilege
pleading
guilty
make
constitutional
promise
fair
trial
worthless
thing
deciding
appeal
basis
obvious
constitutionally
fatal
defect
see
also
douglas
supra
procedure
whereby
indigent
defendant
must
demonstrate
merit
case
obtaining
counsel
appeal
comport
fair
procedure
anders
california
constitutional
requirement
substantial
equality
fair
process
attained
counsel
acts
role
active
advocate
emphasis
added
decisions
anders
entsminger
iowa
jones
barnes
inconsistent
petitioners
interpretation
noted
cases
dealt
responsibilities
attorney
representing
indigent
criminal
defendant
appeal
although
reached
different
result
jones
reached
anders
entsminger
cases
rest
premise
state
must
supply
indigent
criminal
appellants
attorneys
provide
specified
types
assistance
appellants
right
effective
assistance
counsel
petitioners
claim
rights
enjoyed
criminal
appellants
source
equal
protection
clause
rights
measured
rights
nonindigent
appellants
petitioners
argument
instant
case
correct
nonindigent
appellants
right
effective
assistance
counsel
follow
indigent
appellants
also
right
effective
assistance
counsel
three
cases
erred
reaching
contrary
conclusion
lesson
cases
pointed
ross
supra
clause
triggers
distinct
inquiry
due
process
emphasizes
fairness
state
individual
dealing
state
regardless
individuals
situation
may
treated
equal
protection
hand
emphasizes
disparity
treatment
state
classes
individuals
whose
situations
arguably
indistinguishable
cases
like
griffin
douglas
due
process
concerns
involved
involved
set
system
appeals
right
refused
offer
defendant
fair
opportunity
obtain
adjudication
merits
appeal
equal
protection
concerns
involved
state
treated
class
defendants
indigent
ones
differently
purposes
offering
meaningful
appeal
concerns
implicated
griffin
douglas
cases
clauses
supported
decisions
reached
affirmed
footnotes
cases
appellant
shall
file
record
appeal
statement
setting
forth
name
appellant
appellee
name
address
counsel
appellant
appellee
name
address
trial
judge
date
judgment
appealed
entered
page
record
appeal
may
found
date
notice
appeal
filed
page
record
appeal
may
found
following
facts
true
notice
cross
appeal
filed
supersedeas
bond
executed
reason
appeal
advanced
suit
involving
multiple
claims
judgment
made
final
another
appeal
pending
case
involves
transaction
occurrence
common
question
law
fact
appeal
consolidated
giving
style
case
appellant
free
bond
set
forth
brief
petitioners
argument
headings
appellate
brief
error
admit
photographs
appellant
evidence
lacked
probative
value
served
mislead
arouse
passion
prejudice
jury
ii
trial
charge
jury
failed
meet
requirements
due
process
law
iii
appellant
denied
constitutional
right
fair
trial
improper
conduct
trial
prejudicial
comments
made
prosecutor
summation
app
merits
none
claims
us
district
also
referred
respondent
counsel
board
governors
kentucky
state
bar
association
disciplinary
proceedings
attacking
work
product
see
respondent
represented
counsel
commonwealth
informed
five
days
prior
oral
argument
respondent
finally
released
custody
civil
rights
including
suffrage
right
hold
public
office
restored
may
however
respondent
pardoned
collateral
consequences
conviction
remain
including
possibility
conviction
used
impeach
testimony
might
give
future
proceeding
possibility
used
subject
persistent
felony
offender
prosecution
go
trial
felony
charges
future
case
thus
moot
see
carafas
lavallee
sibron
new
york
seemingly
respondent
entered
stipulation
attorney
appeal
retained
appointed
cases
dealing
right
counsel
whether
trial
appeal
often
focused
defendant
need
attorney
meet
adversary
presentation
prosecutor
see
douglas
california
noting
benefit
counsel
examination
record
research
law
marshalling
arguments
client
behalf
cases
emphasize
defendant
need
counsel
order
obtain
favorable
decision
facts
case
emphasize
different
albeit
related
aspect
counsel
role
expert
professional
whose
assistance
necessary
legal
system
governed
complex
rules
procedures
defendant
obtain
decision
much
less
favorable
decision
merits
case
situation
like
counsel
failure
particularly
egregious
essentially
waived
respondent
opportunity
make
case
merits
sense
difficult
distinguish
respondent
situation
someone
counsel
cf
anders
california
entsminger
iowa
ross
moffitt
held
considerations
governing
discretionary
appeal
somewhat
different
see
infra
course
right
effective
assistance
counsel
dependent
right
counsel
see
wainwright
torna
per
curiam
since
respondent
constitutional
right
counsel
deprived
effective
assistance
counsel
retained
counsel
failure
file
application
timely
omitted
moreover
jones
barnes
adjudicated
similar
claim
ineffective
assistance
appellate
counsel
jones
appellate
attorney
failed
raise
every
issue
requested
criminal
defendant
rejected
claim
right
effective
assistance
appellate
counsel
counsel
conduct
fact
served
goal
vigorous
effective
advocacy
reasoning
entirely
superfluous
right
effective
assistance
counsel
first
place
see
francois
wainwright
tsirizotakis
lefevre
cert
denied
post
branch
cupp
alvord
wainwright
cert
denied
post
cunningham
henderson
doyle
gilbert
sowders
per
curiam
dismissal
appeal
retained
counsel
ran
afoul
highly
technical
procedural
rule
violated
due
process
perez
wainwright
citing
cases
cert
denied
robinson
wyrick
cleaver
bordenkircher
cert
denied
sub
nom
sowders
cleaver
miller
mccarthy
passmore
estelle
cert
denied
cantrell
alabama
cert
denied
walters
harris
cert
denied
sub
nom
wren
macon
lash
hill
page
performance
retained
counsel
appeal
judged
standards
anders
entsminger
blanchard
brewer
dismissal
appeal
retained
counsel
failed
serve
papers
properly
held
violation
due
process
williams
see
also
harkness
state
ark
per
curiam
people
barton
cal
erb
state
del
hines
barclay
wainwright
mcauliffe
rutledge
state
erwin
haw
people
brown
burton
state
ind
wilson
state
md
irving
state
miss
people
gonzalez
shipman
gladden
commonwealth
wilkerson
grooms
state
savo
rhodes
leverette
cases
diverge
widely
standards
used
judge
ineffectiveness
remedy
ordered
rationale
used
express
opinion
merits
decisions
stahl
commonwealth
kentucky
noted
postconviction
motion
defendant
prove
counsel
ineffective
appeal
proper
procedure
trial
vacate
judgment
enter
new
one
whereupon
appeal
may
taken
new
judgment
see
also
rodriquez
ordering
similar
remedy
denial
appeal
federal
prosecution
winterhalder
per
curiam
discussing
remedies
see
supra
see
also
bearden
georgia
went
ross
analyze
issue
presented
right
counsel
discretionary
appeals
primarily
terms
equal
protection
clause
see
however
neither
ross
cases
griffin
line
ever
rejected
proposition
due
process
clause
exerted
significant
influence
analysis
area
chief
justice
burger
dissenting
things
plagued
administration
criminal
justice
contributed
lowered
public
confidence
courts
interminable
appeals
retrials
lack
finality
today
justice
rehnquist
cogently
points
adds
another
barrier
finality
one
offers
real
contribution
fairer
justice
join
justice
rehnquist
dissenting
justice
rehnquist
chief
justice
joins
dissenting
case
creates
virtually
whole
cloth
fourteenth
amendment
due
process
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
criminal
conviction
materials
works
previous
cases
requiring
indigents
afforded
basic
tools
indigent
appealing
criminal
convictions
cases
interpreting
sixth
amendment
guarantee
assistance
counsel
criminal
trial
simply
equal
task
called
upon
perform
relies
heavily
statement
ross
moffitt
precise
rationale
griffin
douglas
lines
cases
never
explicitly
stated
support
derived
equal
protection
clause
due
process
clause
today
ignores
conclusion
six
justices
joined
ross
unfairness
results
indigents
singled
state
denied
meaningful
access
appellate
system
poverty
question
profitably
considered
equal
protection
analysis
one
place
douglas
california
stated
additional
obstacles
placed
path
indigent
seeking
appeal
conviction
comport
fair
procedure
explained
unfairness
entirely
terms
inequality
lacking
equality
demanded
fourteenth
amendment
rich
man
appeals
right
enjoys
benefit
counsel
examination
record
research
law
marshalling
arguments
behalf
indigent
already
burdened
preliminary
determination
case
without
merit
forced
shift
similar
vein
fair
reading
cases
dealing
appellate
review
cited
reveals
uniform
reliance
equal
protection
concepts
due
process
contrary
characterization
anders
california
entsminger
iowa
jones
barnes
create
indigents
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
thus
per
force
confer
right
cases
simply
require
appointed
appellate
counsel
represent
clients
vigor
retained
counsel
ordinarily
represent
paying
clients
neither
language
constitution
precedents
establish
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
sixth
amendment
provides
criminal
prosecutions
accused
shall
enjoy
right
assistance
counsel
defense
emphasis
added
observes
language
interpreted
confer
right
effective
assistance
counsel
guarantee
extended
state
criminal
prosecutions
incorporation
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
words
prosecutions
defense
plainly
indicate
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
applies
trial
level
proceedings
stage
accused
needs
attorney
shield
protect
haled
state
stripped
presumption
innocence
ross
moffitt
appeal
convicted
criminal
entirely
different
matter
found
guilty
beyond
reasonable
doubt
sentenced
term
imprisonment
subject
immediate
deprivation
liberty
without
constitutional
requirement
proceedings
seeks
upset
prior
determination
guilt
universally
permitted
retain
attorney
serve
sword
endeavor
question
attorney
substantial
critical
assistance
appeal
afford
attorney
well
advised
retain
one
commonly
accordingly
matter
equal
protection
held
douglas
california
supra
must
provide
attorney
afford
one
stand
equal
footing
nonindigents
seeking
upset
convictions
however
extends
right
beyond
supporting
rationale
constitutional
requirement
state
provide
appeal
wholly
within
discretion
state
allow
allow
review
mckane
durston
state
decides
confer
right
appeal
free
upon
terms
wisdom
may
deemed
proper
decision
constitutional
aberration
right
appeal
federal
convictions
congress
granted
right
direct
review
capital
cases
congress
extended
right
include
otherwise
infamous
crimes
see
carroll
kent
commentaries
american
law
similarly
right
appeal
criminal
convictions
england
see
griffin
illinois
frankfurter
concurring
judgment
jenks
short
history
english
law
ed
countries
concept
due
process
criminal
proceedings
addressed
almost
entirely
fairness
trial
citing
wainwright
torna
per
curiam
candidly
acknowledges
course
right
effective
assistance
counsel
dependent
right
counsel
ante
proper
analysis
precedents
indicate
apart
equal
protection
clause
respondent
invoked
case
constitutional
right
counsel
appeal
therefore
even
logic
derived
constitutional
right
effective
assistance
counsel
appeal
cites
analogy
goldberg
kelly
proposition
state
confers
right
appeal
though
required
confer
right
must
establish
appellate
procedures
satisfy
due
process
clause
goldberg
entitlement
cases
totally
inapposite
turn
fact
state
created
form
property
due
process
clause
express
terms
applies
deprivations
property
true
due
process
clause
also
expressly
applies
deprivations
liberty
basis
incorporating
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
fourteenth
amendment
respondent
liberty
deprived
lawful
state
criminal
conviction
see
ross
moffitt
supra
unsuccessful
attempt
upset
conviction
appellate
attack
statement
griffin
illinois
supra
illinois
created
appellate
courts
integral
part
illinois
trial
system
finally
adjudicating
guilt
innocence
defendant
characterization
illinois
system
plurality
inconsistent
general
view
state
appellate
review
expressed
recently
six
members
ross
moffit
supra
consequences
decision
seem
undesirable
challenges
trial
counsel
performance
become
routine
federal
habeas
petitions
lawfully
convicted
criminals
meritorious
bases
attacking
conduct
trials
able
tie
courts
habeas
petitions
alleging
defective
performance
appellate
counsel
result
akin
effect
created
mirror
held
facing
another
mirror
image
repeating
infinity
today
decision
also
undermines
ability
state
federal
courts
enforce
procedural
rules
appeal
presumably
rules
common
almost
every
appellate
system
country
providing
dismissal
appeal
failure
comply
reasonable
time
limits
see
fed
rule
app
proc
longer
enforced
criminal
defendant
appeal
understandable
sympathy
criminal
defendant
badly
served
lawyer
hired
represent
appealing
conviction
lead
treat
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
general
dispensing
authority
use
may
indiscriminately
free
litigants
consequences
attorney
neglect
malpractice
areas
life
law
bound
often
prejudice
acts
omissions
agents
believe
fourteenth
amendment
prohibits
carrying
generally
recognized
principle
prosecution
appeals
judgment
conviction
see
eskridge
washington
state
board
prison
terms
paroles
per
curiam
hold
estitute
defendants
must
afforded
adequate
appellate
review
defendants
money
enough
buy
transcripts
quoting
griffin
burns
ohio
indigents
must
opportunities
invoke
discretion
ohio
lane
brown
present
case
falls
clearly
within
area
staked
griffin
burns
smith
bennett
eskridge
procedure
based
indigency
alone
meet
constitutional
standards
draper
washington
duty
state
provide
indigent
adequate
effective
appellate
review
given
appellants
funds
state
must
provide
indigent
defendant
means
presenting
contentions
appellate
good
available
nonindigent
defendant
similar
contentions
anders
california
assure
penniless
defendants
rights
opportunities
appeal
nearly
practicable
enjoyed
persons
similar
situation
able
afford
retention
private
counsel
swenson
bosler
per
curiam
assistance
counsel
appeal
right
may
denied
criminal
defendants
solely
indigency
see
also
entsminger
iowa
relies
line
cases
anders
jones
barnes
interpreting
douglas
anders