wiggins
smith
warden
et
argued
march
decided
june
petitioner
wiggins
convicted
capital
murder
maryland
judge
subsequently
elected
sentenced
jury
public
defenders
schlaich
nethercott
moved
bifurcate
sentencing
representing
planned
prove
wiggins
kill
victim
hand
necessary
present
mitigation
case
denied
motion
sentencing
nethercott
told
jury
opening
statement
hear
among
things
wiggins
difficult
life
evidence
never
introduced
closing
arguments
outside
presence
jury
schlaich
made
proffer
preserve
bifurcation
issue
appeal
detailing
mitigation
case
counsel
presented
schlaich
never
mentioned
wiggins
life
history
family
background
jury
sentenced
wiggins
death
maryland
appeals
affirmed
represented
new
counsel
wiggins
sought
postconviction
relief
arguing
trial
counsel
rendered
ineffective
assistance
failing
investigate
present
mitigating
evidence
dysfunctional
background
presented
expert
testimony
forensic
social
worker
severe
physical
sexual
abuse
suffered
hands
mother
care
series
foster
parents
schlaich
testified
remember
retaining
forensic
social
worker
prepare
social
history
sentencing
even
though
state
funds
available
purpose
explained
nethercott
decided
focus
retrying
factual
case
disputing
wiggins
direct
responsibility
murder
trial
denied
petition
state
appeals
affirmed
concluding
trial
counsel
made
reasoned
choice
proceed
considered
best
defense
subsequently
federal
district
granted
wiggins
relief
federal
habeas
petition
holding
maryland
courts
rejection
ineffective
assistance
claim
involved
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
reversing
fourth
circuit
found
trial
counsel
strategic
decision
focus
wiggins
direct
responsibility
reasonable
held
performance
wiggins
attorneys
sentencing
violated
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
pp
federal
writ
granted
state
decision
contrary
involved
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
precedents
unreasonable
application
prong
permits
writ
granted
state
identifies
correct
governing
legal
principle
unreasonably
applies
facts
petitioner
case
williams
taylor
standard
satisfied
state
decision
must
objectively
unreasonable
incorrect
erroneous
ineffective
assistance
claim
two
components
petitioner
must
show
counsel
performance
deficient
deficiency
prejudiced
defense
strickland
washington
performance
deficient
falls
objective
standard
reasonableness
defined
terms
prevailing
professional
norms
strickland
counsel
claim
limited
investigation
petitioner
background
reflected
tactical
judgment
present
mitigating
evidence
pursue
alternative
strategy
instead
evaluating
petitioner
claim
principal
concern
whether
counsel
presented
mitigation
case
whether
investigation
supporting
decision
introduce
mitigating
evidence
wiggins
background
reasonable
thus
conducts
objective
review
performance
measured
reasonableness
prevailing
professional
norms
including
consideration
challenged
conduct
seen
counsel
perspective
time
conduct
pp
counsel
conduct
reasonable
investigation
decision
expand
investigation
beyond
presentence
investigation
psi
report
baltimore
city
department
social
services
dss
records
fell
short
professional
standards
prevailing
maryland
standard
practice
maryland
capital
cases
time
included
preparation
social
history
report
although
funds
retain
forensic
social
worker
counsel
chose
commission
report
conduct
similarly
fell
short
american
bar
association
capital
defense
work
standards
moreover
light
facts
counsel
discovered
dss
records
concerning
wiggins
alcoholic
mother
problems
foster
care
counsel
decision
cease
investigating
unreasonable
reasonably
competent
attorney
realized
pursuing
leads
necessary
making
informed
choice
among
possible
defenses
particularly
given
apparent
absence
aggravating
factors
wiggins
background
indeed
counsel
discovered
evidence
suggest
mitigation
case
counterproductive
investigation
fruitless
thus
distinguishing
case
precedents
found
limited
investigations
mitigating
evidence
reasonable
record
sentencing
proceedings
underscores
unreasonableness
counsel
conduct
suggesting
failure
investigate
thoroughly
stemmed
inattention
strategic
judgment
trial
denied
bifurcation
motion
every
reason
develop
powerful
mitigation
case
possible
sentencing
process
counsel
focus
exclusively
wiggins
direct
responsibility
murder
rather
put
halfhearted
mitigation
case
instead
maryland
appeals
assumption
counsel
investigation
adequate
reflected
unreasonable
application
strickland
deferring
counsel
decision
present
every
conceivable
mitigation
defense
despite
fact
counsel
based
alleged
choice
inadequate
investigation
maryland
appeals
unreasonably
applied
strickland
conclusion
social
services
records
revealed
incidences
sexual
abuse
fact
reflects
unreasonable
determination
facts
light
evidence
presented
state
proceeding
contrary
state
contention
record
whole
support
conclusion
counsel
conducted
thorough
investigation
one
describes
ultimately
conclusion
counsel
investigation
inadequate
mean
strickland
requires
counsel
investigate
every
conceivable
line
mitigating
evidence
matter
unlikely
effort
assist
defendant
sentencing
strickland
require
counsel
present
evidence
sentencing
every
case
rather
conclusion
based
much
limited
principle
strategic
choices
made
less
complete
investigation
reasonable
extent
reasonable
professional
judgments
support
limitations
investigation
strickland
supra
pp
counsel
failures
prejudiced
wiggins
defense
establish
prejudice
defendant
must
show
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
proceeding
result
different
strickland
supra
assesses
prejudice
reweighing
aggravating
evidence
totality
mitigating
evidence
adduced
trial
habeas
proceedings
williams
taylor
supra
mitigating
evidence
counsel
failed
discover
present
powerful
wiggins
experienced
severe
privation
abuse
custody
alcoholic
absentee
mother
physical
torment
sexual
molestation
repeated
rape
foster
care
time
spent
homeless
diminished
mental
capacities
augment
mitigation
case
thus
kind
troubled
history
relevant
assessing
defendant
moral
culpability
penry
lynaugh
given
nature
extent
abuse
reasonable
probability
competent
attorney
aware
history
introduced
sentencing
jury
confronted
mitigating
evidence
returned
different
sentence
significant
mitigating
factor
jury
heard
wiggins
prior
convictions
able
place
excruciating
life
history
mitigating
side
scale
reasonable
probability
least
one
juror
struck
different
balance
wiggins
record
violent
conduct
state
introduced
offset
powerful
mitigating
narrative
thus
available
mitigating
evidence
taken
whole
might
well
influenced
jury
appraisal
moral
culpability
pp
reversed
remanded
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
stevens
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
breyer
joined
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
thomas
joined
kevin
wiggins
petitioner
sewall
smith
warden
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
june
justice
delivered
opinion
petitioner
kevin
wiggins
argues
attorneys
failure
investigate
background
present
mitigating
evidence
unfortunate
life
history
capital
sentencing
proceedings
violated
sixth
amendment
right
counsel
case
consider
whether
appeals
fourth
circuit
erred
upholding
maryland
appeals
rejection
claim
september
police
discovered
florence
lacs
drowned
bathtub
ransacked
apartment
woodlawn
maryland
wiggins
state
md
state
indicted
petitioner
crime
october
later
filed
notice
intention
seek
death
penalty
two
baltimore
county
public
defenders
carl
schlaich
michelle
nethercott
assumed
responsibility
wiggins
case
july
petitioner
elected
tried
judge
baltimore
county
circuit
ibid
august
trial
found
petitioner
guilty
murder
robbery
two
counts
theft
app
conviction
wiggins
elected
sentenced
jury
trial
scheduled
proceedings
begin
october
september
counsel
filed
motion
bifurcation
sentencing
hopes
presenting
wiggins
case
two
phases
counsel
intended
first
prove
wiggins
act
principal
first
degree
kill
victim
hand
see
md
ann
code
art
requiring
proof
direct
responsibility
death
eligibility
counsel
intended
necessary
present
mitigation
case
memorandum
support
motion
counsel
argued
bifurcation
enable
present
case
best
light
separating
two
cases
prevent
introduction
mitigating
evidence
diluting
claim
wiggins
directly
responsible
murder
app
october
denied
bifurcation
motion
sentencing
proceedings
commenced
immediately
thereafter
opening
statement
nethercott
told
jurors
hear
evidence
suggesting
someone
wiggins
actually
killed
lacs
counsel
explained
judge
instruct
weigh
wiggins
clean
record
factor
death
sentence
concluded
going
hear
kevin
wiggins
difficult
life
easy
worked
tried
productive
citizen
reached
age
convictions
prior
crimes
violence
convictions
period
think
important
thing
consider
proceedings
however
counsel
introduced
evidence
wiggins
life
history
closing
arguments
schlaich
made
proffer
outside
presence
jury
preserve
bifurcation
issue
appeal
detailed
mitigation
case
counsel
presented
granted
bifurcation
motion
explained
introduced
psychological
reports
expert
testimony
demonstrating
wiggins
limited
intellectual
capacities
childlike
emotional
state
one
hand
absence
aggressive
patterns
behavior
capacity
empathy
desire
function
world
see
point
schlaich
proffer
evidence
petitioner
life
history
family
background
october
instructed
jury
sentencing
task
later
afternoon
jury
returned
sentence
death
divided
maryland
appeals
affirmed
wiggins
state
md
cert
denied
wiggins
sought
postconviction
relief
baltimore
county
circuit
new
counsel
challenged
adequacy
representation
sentencing
arguing
attorneys
rendered
constitutionally
defective
assistance
failing
investigate
present
mitigating
evidence
dysfunctional
background
app
pet
cert
support
claim
petitioner
presented
testimony
hans
selvog
licensed
social
worker
certified
expert
app
selvog
testified
concerning
elaborate
social
history
report
prepared
containing
evidence
severe
physical
sexual
abuse
petitioner
suffered
hands
mother
care
series
foster
parents
relying
state
social
services
medical
school
records
well
interviews
petitioner
numerous
family
members
selvog
chronicled
petitioner
bleak
life
history
app
pet
cert
according
selvog
report
petitioner
mother
chronic
alcoholic
frequently
left
wiggins
siblings
home
alone
days
forcing
beg
food
eat
paint
chips
garbage
wiggins
abusive
behavior
included
beating
children
breaking
kitchen
often
kept
locked
sex
men
children
slept
bed
one
occasion
forced
petitioner
hand
hot
stove
burner
incident
led
petitioner
hospitalization
age
six
state
placed
wiggins
foster
care
petitioner
first
second
foster
mothers
abused
physically
petitioner
explained
selvog
father
second
foster
home
repeatedly
molested
raped
age
petitioner
ran
away
foster
home
began
living
streets
returned
intermittently
additional
foster
homes
including
one
foster
mother
sons
allegedly
one
occasion
leaving
foster
care
system
wiggins
entered
job
corps
program
allegedly
sexually
abused
supervisor
postconviction
proceedings
schlaich
testified
remember
retaining
forensic
social
worker
prepare
social
history
even
though
state
made
funds
available
purpose
app
explained
nethercott
well
advance
trial
decided
focus
efforts
retry
ing
factual
case
disputing
wiggins
direct
responsibility
murder
april
close
proceedings
judge
observed
bench
remember
capital
case
counsel
compiled
social
history
defendant
explaining
ot
social
history
least
see
got
absolute
error
flabbergasted
appeals
said
anything
else
october
however
trial
denied
wiggins
petition
postconviction
relief
concluded
decision
investigate
matter
trial
tactics
ineffective
assistance
counsel
app
pet
cert
maryland
appeals
affirmed
denial
relief
concluding
trial
counsel
made
deliberate
tactical
decision
concentrate
effort
convincing
jury
appellant
directly
responsible
murder
wiggins
state
observed
counsel
knew
wiggins
unfortunate
childhood
available
presentence
investigation
psi
report
prepared
division
parole
probation
required
maryland
law
md
ann
code
art
well
detailed
social
service
records
recorded
incidences
physical
sexual
abuse
alcoholic
mother
placements
foster
care
borderline
retardation
acknowledged
evidence
neither
detailed
graphic
history
elaborated
selvog
report
emphasized
counsel
investigate
aware
appellant
background
emphasis
original
counsel
knew
least
one
uncontested
mitigating
factor
wiggins
lack
prior
convictions
jury
attempt
disprove
wiggins
direct
responsibility
murder
fail
result
concluded
schlaich
nethercott
made
reasoned
choice
proceed
thought
best
defense
september
wiggins
filed
petition
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
district
trial
granted
relief
holding
maryland
courts
rejection
ineffective
assistance
claim
involved
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
wiggins
corcoran
supp
citing
williams
taylor
rejected
state
defense
counsel
tactical
decision
guilt
concluding
strategic
decision
reasonable
must
based
upon
information
attorney
made
conducting
reasonable
investigation
supp
found
though
counsel
aware
aspects
wiggins
background
knowledge
excuse
duty
make
fully
informed
deliberate
decision
whether
present
mitigation
case
fact
concluded
knowledge
triggered
obligation
look
reviewing
district
decision
de
novo
fourth
circuit
reversed
holding
counsel
made
reasonable
strategic
decision
focus
petitioner
direct
responsibility
wiggins
corcoran
contrasted
counsel
complete
failure
investigate
potential
mitigating
evidence
williams
fact
schlaich
nethercott
knew
least
details
wiggins
childhood
psi
social
services
records
acknowledged
counsel
likely
knew
investigation
resulted
sordid
details
surfacing
agreed
maryland
appeals
counsel
knowledge
avenues
mitigation
available
sufficient
make
informed
strategic
choice
challenge
petitioner
direct
responsibility
murder
emphasized
conflicting
medical
testimony
respect
time
death
absence
direct
evidence
wiggins
unexplained
forensic
evidence
crime
scene
supported
counsel
strategy
granted
certiorari
reverse
ii
petitioner
renews
contention
attorneys
performance
sentencing
violated
sixth
amendment
right
effective
assistance
counsel
amendments
enacted
part
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
circumscribe
consideration
wiggins
claim
require
us
limit
analysis
law
clearly
established
precedents
time
state
decision
section
provides
application
writ
habeas
corpus
behalf
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
shall
granted
respect
claim
adjudicated
merits
state
proceedings
unless
adjudication
claim
resulted
decision
contrary
involved
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
resulted
decision
based
unreasonable
determination
facts
light
evidence
presented
state
proceeding
made
clear
unreasonable
application
prong
permits
federal
habeas
grant
writ
state
identifies
correct
governing
legal
principle
decisions
unreasonably
applies
principle
facts
petitioner
case
williams
taylor
supra
see
also
bell
cone
words
federal
may
grant
relief
state
misapplied
governing
legal
principle
set
facts
different
case
principle
announced
lockyer
andrade
slip
citing
williams
taylor
supra
order
federal
find
state
application
precedent
unreasonable
state
decision
must
incorrect
erroneous
see
lockyer
supra
slip
state
application
must
objectively
unreasonable
see
williams
taylor
supra
established
legal
principles
govern
claims
ineffective
assistance
counsel
strickland
washington
ineffective
assistance
claim
two
components
petitioner
must
show
counsel
performance
deficient
deficiency
prejudiced
defense
establish
deficient
performance
petitioner
must
demonstrate
counsel
representation
fell
objective
standard
reasonableness
declined
articulate
specific
guidelines
appropriate
attorney
conduct
instead
emphasized
proper
measure
attorney
performance
remains
simply
reasonableness
prevailing
professional
norms
ibid
case
strickland
petitioner
claim
stems
counsel
decision
limit
scope
investigation
potential
mitigating
evidence
strickland
counsel
attempt
justify
limited
investigation
reflecting
tactical
judgment
present
mitigating
evidence
sentencing
pursue
alternate
strategy
instead
rejecting
strickland
claim
defined
deference
owed
strategic
judgments
terms
adequacy
investigations
supporting
judgments
trategic
choices
made
thorough
investigation
law
facts
relevant
plausible
options
virtually
unchallengeable
strategic
choices
made
less
complete
investigation
reasonable
precisely
extent
reasonable
professional
judgments
support
limitations
investigation
words
counsel
duty
make
reasonable
investigations
make
reasonable
decision
makes
particular
investigations
unnecessary
ineffectiveness
case
particular
decision
investigate
must
directly
assessed
reasonableness
circumstances
applying
heavy
measure
deference
counsel
judgments
opinion
williams
taylor
illustrative
proper
application
standards
finding
williams
ineffectiveness
claim
meritorious
applied
strickland
concluded
counsel
failure
uncover
present
voluminous
mitigating
evidence
sentencing
justified
tactical
decision
focus
williams
voluntary
confessions
counsel
fulfill
ed
obligation
conduct
thorough
investigation
defendant
background
citing
aba
standards
criminal
justice
commentary
ed
williams
yet
decided
time
maryland
appeals
rendered
decision
issue
case
cf
post
scalia
dissenting
williams
case
us
habeas
review
contrary
dissent
contention
post
therefore
made
new
law
resolving
williams
ineffectiveness
claim
see
williams
noting
merits
williams
claim
squarely
governed
holding
strickland
see
also
noting
trial
correctly
applied
components
strickland
standard
petitioner
claim
proceeding
discuss
counsel
failure
investigate
violation
strickland
performance
prong
highlighting
counsel
duty
investigate
referring
aba
standards
criminal
justice
guides
applied
clearly
established
precedent
strickland
apply
today
cf
strickland
establishing
thorough
investigation
virtually
unchallengeable
underscoring
counsel
duty
make
reasonable
investigations
see
also
prevailing
norms
practice
reflected
american
bar
association
standards
like
guides
determining
reasonable
light
standards
principal
concern
deciding
whether
schlaich
nethercott
exercised
reasonable
professional
judgmen
whether
counsel
presented
mitigation
case
rather
focus
whether
investigation
supporting
counsel
decision
introduce
mitigating
evidence
wiggins
background
reasonable
ibid
cf
williams
taylor
supra
concurring
noting
counsel
duty
conduct
requisite
diligent
investigation
client
background
assessing
counsel
investigation
must
conduct
objective
review
performance
measured
reasonableness
prevailing
professional
norms
strickland
includes
consideration
challenged
conduct
seen
counsel
perspective
time
effort
must
made
eliminate
distorting
effects
hindsight
record
demonstrates
counsel
investigation
drew
three
sources
app
counsel
arranged
william
stejskal
psychologist
conduct
number
tests
petitioner
stejskal
concluded
petitioner
iq
difficulty
coping
demanding
situations
exhibited
features
personality
disorder
reports
revealed
nothing
however
petitioner
life
history
tr
oral
arg
respect
history
counsel
available
written
psi
included
account
wiggins
personal
history
noting
misery
youth
quoting
description
background
observing
spent
life
foster
care
app
counsel
also
tracked
records
kept
baltimore
city
department
social
services
dss
documenting
petitioner
various
placements
state
foster
care
system
lodging
petitioner
describing
scope
counsel
investigation
petitioner
life
history
fourth
circuit
maryland
appeals
referred
two
sources
information
see
wiggins
state
counsel
decision
expand
investigation
beyond
psi
dss
records
fell
short
professional
standards
prevailed
maryland
schlaich
acknowledged
standard
practice
maryland
capital
cases
time
wiggins
trial
included
preparation
social
history
report
app
despite
fact
public
defender
office
made
funds
available
retention
forensic
social
worker
counsel
chose
commission
report
counsel
conduct
similarly
fell
short
standards
capital
defense
work
articulated
american
bar
association
aba
standards
long
referred
guides
determining
reasonable
strickland
supra
williams
taylor
supra
aba
guidelines
provide
investigations
mitigating
evidence
comprise
efforts
discover
reasonably
available
mitigating
evidence
evidence
rebut
aggravating
evidence
may
introduced
prosecutor
aba
guidelines
appointment
performance
counsel
death
penalty
cases
emphasis
added
despite
norms
however
counsel
abandoned
investigation
petitioner
background
acquired
rudimentary
knowledge
history
narrow
set
sources
cf
noting
among
topics
counsel
consider
presenting
medical
history
educational
history
employment
training
history
family
social
history
prior
adult
juvenile
correctional
experience
religious
cultural
influences
emphasis
added
aba
standards
criminal
justice
commentary
lawyer
also
substantial
important
role
perform
raising
mitigating
factors
prosecutor
initially
sentencing
investigation
essential
fulfillment
functions
scope
investigation
also
unreasonable
light
counsel
actually
discovered
dss
records
records
revealed
several
facts
petitioner
mother
chronic
alcoholic
wiggins
shuttled
foster
home
foster
home
displayed
emotional
difficulties
frequent
lengthy
absences
school
least
one
occasion
mother
left
siblings
alone
days
without
food
see
lodging
petitioner
federal
district
emphasized
reasonably
competent
attorney
realized
pursuing
leads
necessary
making
informed
choice
among
possible
defenses
particularly
given
apparent
absence
aggravating
factors
petitioner
background
supp
indeed
counsel
uncovered
evidence
investigation
suggest
mitigation
case
right
counterproductive
investigation
fruitless
case
therefore
distinguishable
precedents
found
limited
investigations
mitigating
evidence
reasonable
see
strickland
concluding
counsel
limited
investigation
reasonable
interviewed
witnesses
brought
attention
discovering
little
helpful
much
harmful
darden
wainwright
concluding
counsel
engaged
extensive
preparation
decision
present
mitigation
case
resulted
jury
hearing
evidence
petitioner
convicted
violent
crimes
spent
much
life
jail
counsel
investigated
may
well
discovered
sexual
abuse
later
revealed
state
postconviction
proceedings
record
actual
sentencing
proceedings
underscores
unreasonableness
counsel
conduct
suggesting
failure
investigate
thoroughly
resulted
inattention
reasoned
strategic
judgment
counsel
sought
day
sentencing
proceedings
bifurcated
retrial
guilt
mitigation
stage
see
supra
eve
sentencing
counsel
represented
prepared
come
forward
mitigating
evidence
app
intended
present
evidence
event
granted
motion
bifurcate
words
prior
sentencing
counsel
never
actually
abandoned
possibility
present
mitigation
defense
denied
motion
every
reason
develop
powerful
mitigation
case
possible
sentencing
proceeding
counsel
focus
exclusively
wiggins
direct
responsibility
murder
introducing
issue
opening
statement
nethercott
entreated
jury
consider
wiggins
found
done
also
though
told
jury
hear
kevin
wiggins
difficult
life
counsel
never
followed
suggestion
details
wiggins
history
time
counsel
called
criminologist
testify
inmates
serving
life
sentences
tend
adjust
well
refrain
violence
prison
testimony
bearing
whether
petitioner
committed
murder
hand
far
focusing
exclusively
petitioner
direct
responsibility
counsel
put
halfhearted
mitigation
case
taking
precisely
type
shotgun
approach
maryland
appeals
concluded
counsel
sought
avoid
wiggins
state
viewed
light
strategic
decision
state
courts
respondents
invoke
justify
counsel
limited
pursuit
mitigating
evidence
resembles
rationalization
counsel
conduct
accurate
description
deliberations
prior
sentencing
rejecting
petitioner
ineffective
assistance
claim
maryland
appeals
appears
assumed
counsel
information
respect
petitioner
background
information
psi
dss
records
position
make
tactical
choice
present
mitigation
defense
citing
federal
state
precedents
finding
ineffective
assistance
cases
counsel
failed
conduct
investigation
kind
assessing
reasonableness
attorney
investigation
however
must
consider
quantum
evidence
already
known
counsel
also
whether
known
evidence
lead
reasonable
attorney
investigate
even
assuming
schlaich
nethercott
limited
scope
investigation
strategic
reasons
strickland
establish
cursory
investigation
automatically
justifies
tactical
decision
respect
sentencing
strategy
rather
reviewing
must
consider
reasonableness
investigation
said
support
strategy
maryland
appeals
application
strickland
governing
legal
principles
objectively
unreasonable
though
state
acknowledged
petitioner
claim
counsel
failure
prepare
social
history
meet
minimum
standards
profession
conduct
assessment
whether
decision
cease
investigation
upon
obtaining
psi
dss
records
actually
demonstrated
reasonable
professional
judgment
wiggins
state
state
merely
assumed
investigation
adequate
light
psi
dss
records
actually
revealed
however
counsel
chose
abandon
investigation
unreasonable
juncture
making
fully
informed
decision
respect
sentencing
strategy
impossible
appeals
assumption
investigation
adequate
thus
reflected
unreasonable
application
strickland
result
subsequent
deference
counsel
strategic
decision
present
every
conceivable
mitigation
defense
despite
fact
counsel
based
alleged
choice
made
clear
unreasonable
investigation
also
objectively
unreasonable
established
strickland
strategic
choices
made
less
complete
investigation
reasonable
precisely
extent
reasonable
professional
judgments
support
limitations
investigation
additionally
based
conclusion
part
clear
factual
error
social
service
records
recorded
incidences
sexual
abuse
state
concede
records
contain
mention
sexual
abuse
much
less
repeated
molestations
rapes
petitioner
detailed
selvog
report
brief
respondents
brief
amicus
curiae
app
pet
cert
state
assumption
records
documented
instances
abuse
shown
incorrect
clear
convincing
evidence
reflects
unreasonable
determination
facts
light
evidence
presented
state
proceeding
partial
reliance
erroneous
factual
finding
highlights
unreasonableness
state
decision
dissent
insists
hands
tied
state
factual
determinations
wiggins
trial
counsel
investigate
aware
wiggins
background
post
made
clear
maryland
appeals
conclusion
scope
counsel
investigation
petitioner
background
met
legal
standards
set
strickland
represented
objectively
unreasonable
application
precedent
moreover
assumption
counsel
learned
major
aspect
wiggins
background
sexual
abuse
dss
records
clearly
erroneous
requirements
thus
pose
bar
granting
petitioner
habeas
relief
briefs
state
contend
counsel
fact
conducted
thorough
investigation
one
described
conclusion
explain
follows
schlaich
postconviction
testimony
knew
sexual
abuse
wiggins
suffered
well
incident
according
state
amicus
fact
counsel
claimed
aware
evidence
social
services
records
coupled
schlaich
statement
knew
people
reports
app
suggests
counsel
investigation
must
extended
beyond
social
services
records
tr
oral
arg
brief
amicus
curiae
brief
respondents
schlaich
simply
asked
reveal
source
knowledge
abuse
brief
amicus
curiae
considering
reading
state
postconviction
record
note
preliminarily
maryland
appeals
clearly
assumed
counsel
investigation
began
ended
psi
dss
records
investigation
sufficient
scope
satisfy
strickland
reasonableness
requirement
see
wiggins
state
also
assumed
erroneously
social
services
records
cited
incidences
sexual
abuse
see
respondents
interpretation
schlaich
postconviction
testimony
therefore
bearing
whether
maryland
appeals
decision
reflected
objectively
unreasonable
application
strickland
assessment
maryland
appeals
opinion
dissent
apparently
dispute
counsel
investigation
case
consisted
exclusively
psi
dss
records
decision
constituted
unreasonable
application
strickland
see
post
necessity
dissent
primary
contention
maryland
appeals
decide
wiggins
counsel
looked
beyond
psi
dss
records
must
therefore
defer
finding
see
post
found
counsel
investigation
extended
beyond
psi
dss
records
dissent
course
correct
require
defer
finding
state
made
finding
dissent
bases
conclusion
maryland
appeals
statements
ounsel
aware
appellant
unfortunate
childhood
counsel
investigate
aware
appellant
background
see
post
quoting
wiggins
state
supra
state
description
counsel
learned
petitioner
childhood
speaks
explained
counsel
aware
appellant
unfortunate
childhood
schlaich
available
investigation
report
also
detailed
social
service
records
see
construction
reflects
state
understanding
investigation
consisted
two
sources
mentions
indeed
describing
counsel
investigation
petitioner
background
never
much
implies
counsel
uncovered
source
psi
dss
records
conclusion
counsel
aware
incidences
sexual
abuse
suggest
otherwise
cf
post
assumed
counsel
learned
incidents
social
services
records
wiggins
corcoran
subsequent
statement
noted
counsel
investigate
aware
appellant
background
underscores
conclusion
maryland
appeals
assumed
counsel
investigation
wiggins
childhood
consisted
psi
dss
records
use
phrase
noted
dissent
ignores
confirms
counsel
investigation
consisted
sources
previously
described
psi
dss
records
dissent
therefore
rests
upon
fundamental
fallacy
post
maryland
appeals
determined
schlaich
investigation
extended
beyond
psi
dss
records
therefore
must
determine
de
novo
whether
counsel
reached
beyond
psi
dss
records
investigation
petitioner
background
record
whole
support
conclusion
counsel
conducted
thorough
investigation
one
described
dissent
like
state
relies
primarily
schlaich
postconviction
testimony
establish
counsel
investigated
extensively
questions
put
schlaich
postconviction
testimony
referred
knew
social
services
records
line
questioning
first
directed
discovery
documents
subsequent
reference
people
reports
made
direct
response
question
concerning
petitioner
mental
retardation
appears
acknowledgement
psychologist
reports
know
counsel
commissioned
reports
also
revealed
nothing
sexual
abuse
wiggins
experienced
app
state
trial
judge
heard
testimony
concluded
close
proceedings
reason
believe
counsel
information
emphasis
added
state
maintained
oral
argument
schlaich
reference
people
reports
indicated
counsel
learned
sexual
abuse
sources
psi
dss
records
tr
oral
arg
pressed
repeatedly
identify
sources
counsel
might
consulted
state
acknowledged
written
reports
documented
sexual
abuse
speculated
counsel
must
learned
ral
reports
wiggins
phrase
people
reports
unusual
way
counsel
refer
conversations
client
record
contains
evidence
counsel
ever
pursued
line
questioning
wiggins
see
part
emphasized
counsel
retention
psychologist
brief
amicus
curiae
counsel
decision
hire
psychologist
sheds
light
extent
investigation
petitioner
social
background
though
stejskal
based
conclusions
clinical
interviews
wiggins
well
meetings
wiggins
family
members
lodging
petitioner
final
report
discussed
petitioner
mental
capacities
attributed
nothing
learned
wiggins
social
history
underscore
counsel
know
prior
sentencing
sexual
abuse
well
incidents
recorded
dss
records
petitioner
directs
us
content
counsel
october
proffer
closing
statements
outside
presence
jury
schlaich
proffered
mitigation
case
counsel
introduced
granted
motion
bifurcate
app
statement
schlaich
referred
results
psychologist
test
mentioned
nothing
wiggins
troubled
background
given
purpose
proffer
preserve
pursuit
bifurcation
issue
appeal
every
incentive
make
mitigation
case
seem
strong
possible
counsel
failure
include
proffer
powerful
evidence
repeated
sexual
abuse
therefore
explicable
assume
counsel
knowledge
abuse
contrary
dissent
claim
see
post
accusing
schlaich
lying
statements
postconviction
proceedings
knew
abuse
well
incident
may
simply
reflect
mistaken
memory
shaped
passage
time
state
postconviction
proceedings
took
place
four
years
wiggins
sentencing
ultimately
given
counsel
likely
ignorance
history
sexual
abuse
time
sentencing
infer
schlaich
postconviction
testimony
counsel
looked
psi
dss
records
investigating
petitioner
background
indeed
record
contains
mention
sources
undisputed
counsel
possessed
see
supra
therefore
conclude
counsel
investigation
petitioner
background
limited
psi
dss
records
finding
schlaich
nethercott
investigation
meet
strickland
performance
standards
emphasize
strickland
require
counsel
investigate
every
conceivable
line
mitigating
evidence
matter
unlikely
effort
assist
defendant
sentencing
strickland
require
defense
counsel
present
mitigating
evidence
sentencing
every
case
conclusions
interfere
constitutionally
protected
independence
counsel
heart
strickland
base
conclusion
much
limited
principle
strategic
choices
made
less
complete
investigation
reasonable
extent
reasonable
professional
judgments
support
limitations
investigation
decision
investigate
thus
must
directly
assessed
reasonableness
circumstances
counsel
investigation
wiggins
background
reflect
reasonable
professional
judgment
decision
end
investigation
neither
consistent
professional
standards
prevailed
reasonable
light
evidence
counsel
uncovered
social
services
records
evidence
led
reasonably
competent
attorney
investigate
counsel
pursuit
bifurcation
eve
sentencing
partial
presentation
mitigation
case
suggest
incomplete
investigation
result
inattention
reasoned
strategic
judgment
deferring
counsel
decision
pursue
mitigation
case
despite
unreasonable
investigation
maryland
appeals
unreasonably
applied
strickland
furthermore
partially
relied
erroneous
factual
assumption
requirements
habeas
relief
established
thus
satisfied
iii
order
counsel
inadequate
performance
constitute
sixth
amendment
violation
petitioner
must
show
counsel
failures
prejudiced
defense
strickland
strickland
made
clear
establish
prejudice
defendant
must
show
reasonable
probability
counsel
unprofessional
errors
result
proceeding
different
reasonable
probability
probability
sufficient
undermine
confidence
outcome
assessing
prejudice
reweigh
evidence
aggravation
totality
available
mitigating
evidence
case
review
circumscribed
state
conclusion
respect
prejudice
neither
state
courts
reached
prong
strickland
analysis
mitigating
evidence
counsel
failed
discover
present
case
powerful
selvog
reported
based
conversations
wiggins
members
family
see
reply
brief
petitioner
wiggins
experienced
severe
privation
abuse
first
six
years
life
custody
alcoholic
absentee
mother
suffered
physical
torment
sexual
molestation
repeated
rape
subsequent
years
foster
care
time
wiggins
spent
homeless
along
diminished
mental
capacities
augment
mitigation
case
petitioner
thus
kind
troubled
history
declared
relevant
assessing
defendant
moral
culpability
penry
lynaugh
vidence
defendant
background
character
relevant
belief
long
held
society
defendants
commit
criminal
acts
attributable
disadvantaged
background
may
less
culpable
defendants
see
also
eddings
oklahoma
noting
consideration
offender
life
history
process
inflicting
penalty
lockett
ohio
invalidating
ohio
law
permit
consideration
aspects
defendant
background
given
nature
extent
abuse
petitioner
suffered
find
reasonable
probability
competent
attorney
aware
history
introduced
sentencing
admissible
form
may
well
strategically
defensible
upon
reasonably
thorough
investigation
focus
wiggins
direct
responsibility
murder
two
sentencing
strategies
necessarily
mutually
exclusive
given
strength
available
evidence
reasonable
attorney
may
well
chosen
prioritize
mitigation
case
direct
responsibility
challenge
particularly
given
wiggins
history
contained
little
double
edge
found
justify
limited
investigations
cases
cf
burger
kemp
darden
wainwright
dissent
nevertheless
maintains
wiggins
counsel
altered
chosen
strategy
focusing
exclusively
wiggins
direct
responsibility
murder
see
post
made
clear
counsel
position
make
reasonable
strategic
choice
whether
focus
wiggins
direct
responsibility
sordid
details
life
history
investigation
supporting
choice
unreasonable
see
supra
moreover
noted
see
supra
wiggins
counsel
focus
solely
wiggins
direct
responsibility
counsel
told
sentencing
jury
going
hear
kevin
wiggins
difficult
life
app
never
followed
suggestion
find
jury
confronted
considerable
mitigating
evidence
reasonable
probability
returned
different
sentence
reaching
conclusion
need
dissent
suggests
post
make
evidentiary
findings
issue
sentencing
rather
evaluate
totality
evidence
adduced
trial
evidence
adduced
habeas
proceeding
williams
taylor
emphasis
added
event
contrary
dissent
assertion
appears
selvog
report
may
admissible
maryland
law
whittlesey
maryland
md
maryland
appeals
vacated
trial
decision
excluding
hearsay
grounds
testimony
selvog
instructed
trial
judge
exercise
discretion
admit
relevant
reliable
mitigating
evidence
including
hearsay
evidence
might
admissible
phase
trial
relaxed
standard
observed
provide
factfinder
opportunity
consider
aspect
defendant
character
record
defendant
proffers
basis
sentence
less
death
ibid
see
also
ball
state
md
noting
trial
judge
admitted
selvog
social
history
report
defendant
dissent
dismisses
contents
social
history
report
calling
wiggins
liar
claims
sexual
abuse
uncorroborated
gossip
post
maryland
appears
consider
type
evidence
relevant
sentencing
see
whittlesey
supra
reasons
relaxing
rules
evidence
apply
particular
force
death
penalty
context
even
state
contests
wiggins
suffered
various
types
abuse
neglect
detailed
psi
dss
records
selvog
social
history
report
wiggins
sentencing
jury
heard
one
significant
mitigating
factor
wiggins
prior
convictions
jury
able
place
petitioner
excruciating
life
history
mitigating
side
scale
reasonable
probability
least
one
juror
struck
different
balance
cf
borchardt
maryland
md
noting
long
single
juror
concludes
mitigating
evidence
outweighs
aggravating
evidence
death
penalty
imposed
app
instructing
jury
unanimously
find
state
proven
preponderance
evidence
aggravating
circumstance
outweigh
mitigating
circumstances
consider
whether
death
appropriate
sentence
moreover
contrast
petitioner
williams
taylor
supra
wiggins
record
violent
conduct
introduced
state
offset
powerful
mitigating
narrative
cf
rehnquist
dissenting
noting
williams
savagely
beaten
elderly
woman
stolen
two
cars
set
fire
home
stabbed
man
robbery
confessed
choking
two
inmates
breaking
fellow
prisoner
jaw
federal
district
found
mitigating
evidence
case
stronger
state
evidence
support
death
penalty
far
weaker
williams
found
prejudice
result
counsel
failure
investigate
present
mitigating
evidence
thus
conclude
available
mitigating
evidence
taken
whole
might
well
influenced
jury
appraisal
wiggins
moral
culpability
accordingly
judgment
appeals
fourth
circuit
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
kevin
wiggins
petitioner
sewall
smith
warden
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
june
justice
scalia
justice
thomas
joins
dissenting
today
vacates
kevin
wiggins
death
sentence
ground
trial
counsel
investigation
potential
mitigating
evidence
incomplete
ante
wiggins
trial
counsel
testified
oath
however
aware
basic
features
wiggins
troubled
childhood
claims
overlooked
app
chooses
disbelieve
testimony
reasons
withstand
analysis
moreover
even
disbelief
plausibly
entertained
certainly
establish
requires
maryland
appeals
unreasonable
believing
therefore
concluding
counsel
adequately
investigated
wiggins
background
also
fails
observe
requirement
federal
habeas
courts
respect
factual
determinations
rebutted
clear
convincing
evidence
decision
sets
naught
statutory
scheme
described
highly
deferential
standard
evaluating
rulings
lindh
murphy
respectfully
dissent
wiggins
claims
death
sentence
violates
strickland
washington
trial
attorneys
investigated
background
learned
presented
jury
following
evidence
according
family
members
wiggins
mother
alcoholic
neglected
children
failed
feed
properly
app
pet
cert
according
wiggins
sister
india
wiggins
mother
intentionally
burned
wiggins
hands
kitchen
stove
punishment
playing
matches
wiggins
placed
foster
care
age
six
mother
neglect
moved
various
foster
families
according
wiggins
one
foster
parents
sexually
abused
three
times
week
sometimes
every
day
eight
years
old
according
wiggins
age
knocked
unconscious
raped
two
foster
mother
teenage
children
according
wiggins
joined
job
corps
age
job
corps
administrator
sexual
advances
became
sexually
involved
later
according
wiggins
job
corps
supervisor
drugged
wiggins
woke
knew
anally
penetrated
wiggins
borderline
mentally
retarded
information
contained
social
history
report
prepared
social
worker
hans
selvog
use
state
postconviction
proceedings
proceedings
carl
schlaich
one
wiggins
two
trial
attorneys
testified
although
retain
social
worker
assemble
social
history
report
nevertheless
detailed
knowledge
wiggins
background
knew
wiggins
kevin
wiggins
removed
natural
mother
result
finding
neglect
abuse
six
years
old
correct
believe
tracked
got
social
service
records
social
service
records
knew
also
knew
sic
reports
sexual
abuse
one
foster
homes
okay
also
knew
hands
burned
child
result
mother
abuse
also
knew
homosexual
overtures
made
toward
job
corp
supervisor
also
knew
borderline
mentally
retarded
knew
least
knew
reported
people
reports
knew
yes
app
light
testimony
maryland
appeals
found
counsel
investigate
aware
wiggins
background
wiggins
state
md
emphasis
original
specifically
ounsel
aware
wiggins
unfortunate
childhood
determinations
factual
issues
binding
federal
habeas
courts
including
unless
rebutted
clear
convincing
relying
factual
findings
maryland
appeals
rejected
wiggins
claim
trial
attorneys
failed
adequately
investigate
potential
mitigating
evidence
wiggins
trial
counsel
said
detailed
graphic
history
prepared
selvog
constitutional
deficiency
see
gilliam
state
md
cert
denied
burger
kemp
state
adjudicated
wiggins
sixth
amendment
claim
merits
bars
habeas
relief
unless
decision
contrary
involved
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
based
unreasonable
determination
facts
light
evidence
presented
state
proceeding
concludes
without
foundation
maryland
appeals
decision
failed
tests
shall
discuss
turn
concluding
maryland
appeals
unreasonably
applied
clearly
established
precedents
disregards
command
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
used
assessing
reasonableness
decisions
misdescribes
state
opinion
ignoring
requirement
federal
habeas
courts
respect
factual
determinations
defined
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
encompass
holdings
decisions
time
relevant
decision
williams
taylor
emphasis
added
yet
discussing
precedents
clearly
established
respect
ineffectiveness
claims
relies
upon
case
williams
taylor
supra
postdates
maryland
decision
rejecting
wiggins
sixth
amendment
claim
see
ante
concedes
williams
clearly
established
federal
law
time
maryland
appeals
decision
ante
yet
believes
may
ignore
strictures
ground
williams
case
us
habeas
review
therefore
made
new
law
resolving
ineffectiveness
claim
ibid
wrong
premise
conclusion
although
williams
habeas
case
reviewed
first
prong
habeas
petitioner
strickland
claim
question
de
novo
williams
surmounted
bar
habeas
relief
held
virginia
analysis
respect
strickland
second
prong
prejudice
prong
contrary
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
precedents
see
williams
supra
left
us
free
provide
habeas
relief
since
state
raised
teague
defense
see
teague
lane
proceeded
analyze
contention
de
novo
rather
clearly
established
law
clear
fact
cited
cases
discussion
question
see
rejected
claim
even
though
acknowledging
trial
counsel
well
made
thorough
investigation
strickland
eschewed
imposition
rules
counsel
specifically
stating
aba
standards
upon
williams
later
relied
guides
determining
reasonable
guides
emphasis
added
williams
make
new
law
law
clearly
established
time
maryland
appeals
decision
even
correct
characterization
williams
still
justify
decision
ignore
act
congress
whether
williams
made
new
law
williams
held
clearly
established
precedent
time
state
decision
used
find
fault
state
opinion
means
says
simply
defies
congressionally
imposed
limits
federal
habeas
review
concludes
strickland
applied
unreasonably
thereby
satisfied
maryland
appeals
conclusion
trial
counsel
adequately
investigated
wiggins
background
see
wiggins
unreasonable
assessment
possibly
sustained
particularly
light
state
factual
determinations
bind
analysis
point
rests
upon
fundamental
fallacy
state
clearly
assumed
counsel
investigation
began
ended
psi
dss
records
ante
demonstrably
state
observe
wiggins
trial
attorneys
available
presentence
investigation
psi
report
maryland
department
social
services
dss
reports
wiggins
supra
absolutely
nothing
opinion
says
assumes
sources
counsel
relied
rather
makes
assumption
rather
bald
assertion
see
ante
asserting
counsel
cease
investigation
upon
receipt
psi
dss
reports
ante
referring
ounsel
decision
expand
investigation
beyond
psi
dss
records
maryland
appeals
assumed
wiggins
trial
counsel
looked
psi
dss
reports
record
clear
wiggins
trial
attorneys
investigated
well
beyond
sources
investigators
interviewed
wiggins
family
members
see
defendant
supplemental
answer
state
discovery
request
filed
cir
baltimore
lodging
respondents
wiggins
trial
attorneys
hired
psychologist
william
stejskal
reviewed
dss
records
conducted
clinical
interviews
performed
six
different
psychological
tests
wiggins
ibid
app
criminologist
robert
johnson
interviewed
wiggins
testified
wiggins
adjust
adequately
life
prison
schlaich
also
testified
state
postconviction
proceedings
knew
information
wiggins
background
contained
dss
psi
reports
allegation
wiggins
mother
burned
hands
child
schlaich
must
investigated
sources
beyond
reports
notes
ante
maryland
appeals
expressly
state
counsel
investigation
extended
beyond
psi
dss
records
reason
whatever
since
found
counsel
investigate
aware
appellant
background
wiggins
supra
since
finding
based
record
clearly
demonstrates
investigation
beyond
psi
dss
reports
failure
recite
obvious
record
surely
provides
basis
believing
stupidly
assumed
opposite
obvious
record
one
eliminates
mischaracterization
opinion
assumed
wiggins
counsel
knew
contained
dss
psi
reports
basis
finding
unreasonable
believe
counsel
investigation
adequate
noted
earlier
schlaich
testified
state
postconviction
proceedings
aware
essential
items
contained
social
history
report
knew
wiggins
subjected
neglect
abuse
mother
app
reports
sexual
abuse
one
foster
homes
mother
burned
hands
child
job
corps
supervisor
made
homosexual
overtures
towards
wiggins
mentally
retarded
schlaich
explained
although
aware
potential
mitigating
evidence
chose
present
jury
strategic
reason
namely
conflict
efforts
persuade
jury
wiggins
principal
lacs
murder
kill
lacs
hand
two
possible
responses
testimony
might
salvage
wiggins
claim
first
declare
schlaich
inescapable
duty
hire
social
worker
construct
social
history
report
regardless
schlaich
knowledge
wiggins
background
petitioner
makes
suggestion
see
brief
petitioner
asserting
normative
time
wiggins
case
capital
defense
lawyers
maryland
obtain
social
history
flirts
accepting
see
ante
professional
standards
prevailed
maryland
time
wiggins
trial
included
defense
capital
cases
preparation
social
history
report
citing
aba
guidelines
appointment
performance
counsel
death
penalty
cases
hereinafter
aba
guidelines
says
counsel
make
efforts
discover
reasonably
available
mitigating
emphasis
added
think
requirement
social
history
part
clearly
established
federal
law
requires
events
occurred
absurd
nothing
clearly
established
precedents
requires
counsel
retain
social
worker
already
largely
aware
client
background
contrary
strickland
emphasizes
countless
ways
provide
effective
assistance
given
case
revailing
norms
practice
reflected
american
bar
association
standards
like
guides
determining
reasonable
guides
cf
ante
treating
aba
guidelines
norms
inconceivable
schlaich
assuming
testified
truthfully
regarding
detailed
knowledge
wiggins
troubled
childhood
app
need
hire
social
worker
comport
strickland
competence
standards
certainly
unreasonable
maryland
appeals
conclude
otherwise
second
possible
response
schlaich
testimony
extensive
awareness
wiggins
background
assert
schlaich
lied
assumes
sub
silentio
throughout
opinion
schlaich
telling
truth
testified
knew
reports
sexual
abuse
one
wiggins
foster
homes
see
ante
counsel
investigated
may
well
discovered
sexual
abuse
later
revealed
state
postconviction
proceedings
eventually
declares
disbelieves
schlaich
ante
conclusion
rests
upon
blatant
mischaracterization
record
improper
shifting
burden
proof
state
demonstrate
schlaich
awareness
wiggins
background
rather
requiring
wiggins
prove
schlaich
ignorance
importantly
simply
enough
conclude
ante
infer
schlaich
postconviction
testimony
counsel
looked
psi
dss
reports
investigating
petitioner
background
least
reasonable
believe
schlaich
told
truth
unreasonable
maryland
appeals
conclude
wiggins
trial
attorneys
conducted
adequate
investigation
background
see
schlaich
testimony
must
false
insists
social
services
records
contain
evidence
sexual
abuse
questions
put
schlaich
postconviction
testimony
referred
knew
social
services
records
ante
true
schlaich
never
asked
knew
social
services
records
regard
alleged
sexual
abuse
particular
schlaich
answered
following
question
also
knew
sic
reports
sexual
abuse
one
foster
homes
question
refe
schlaich
knew
social
services
records
declares
neither
way
questions
put
schlaich
regarding
knowledge
wiggins
background
see
app
wiggins
postconviction
counsel
simply
never
asked
schlaich
reveal
source
knowledge
schlaich
likely
source
knowledge
alleged
sexual
abuse
wiggins
even
hans
selvog
extensive
social
history
report
unearthed
documentation
corroborating
witnesses
respect
claim
see
app
pet
cert
however
dismisses
possibility
two
reasons
first
record
contains
evidence
counsel
ever
pursued
line
questioning
wiggins
ante
statement
calls
get
bearings
burden
proof
wiggins
show
counsel
made
decision
without
adequate
knowledge
see
strickland
counsel
testified
oath
particular
knowledge
burden
counsel
show
obtained
wiggins
wishes
impeach
testimony
show
counsel
obtained
thus
absence
evidence
record
whether
schlaich
pursued
line
questioning
wiggins
dooms
rather
fortifies
wiggins
claim
wiggins
produced
evidence
anything
hans
selvog
social
history
report
unknown
schlaich
evidence
source
selvog
relied
used
schlaich
second
reason
rejecting
possibility
schlaich
learned
alleged
sexual
abuse
wiggins
even
incomprehensible
claims
phrase
people
reports
unusual
way
counsel
refer
conversations
client
ante
schlaich
never
used
phrase
people
reports
describing
learned
alleged
sexual
abuse
wiggins
foster
homes
schlaich
testified
learned
wiggins
borderline
mental
retardation
reported
people
reports
also
knew
borderline
mentally
retarded
knew
least
knew
reported
people
reports
knew
yes
app
emphasis
added
clear
schlaich
said
least
knew
reported
people
reports
emphasis
added
referred
fact
wiggins
borderline
mentally
retarded
details
wiggins
background
schlaich
previously
testified
knew
final
reason
disbelieving
schlaich
sworn
testimony
failure
mention
alleged
sexual
abuse
proffer
mitigating
evidence
introduce
trial
granted
motion
bifurcate
counsel
failure
include
proffer
powerful
evidence
repeated
sexual
abuse
explicable
assume
counsel
knowledge
abuse
ante
evidence
sexual
abuse
consisted
wiggins
assertions
see
app
app
pet
cert
evidence
exactly
worthy
flattering
description
powerful
nothing
proffer
unless
schlaich
declared
intent
put
wiggins
stand
given
counsel
chosen
trial
strategy
prevent
wiggins
testifying
sentencing
proceedings
decision
mention
sexual
abuse
proffer
perfectly
consistent
counsel
claimed
knowledge
alleged
abuse
course
reasons
offers
range
incredible
feeble
used
support
conclusion
independent
judgment
schlaich
lying
even
attempt
establish
must
objectively
unreasonable
state
believe
schlaich
testimony
therefore
conclude
conducted
adequate
investigation
wiggins
background
possibly
make
showing
wiggins
produced
direct
evidence
attorneys
uninformed
respect
anything
background
muster
circumstantial
evidence
beyond
powerfully
unconvincing
fact
schlaich
failed
mention
allegations
sexual
abuse
proffer
make
things
worse
still
bound
though
one
know
opinion
state
factual
determinations
wiggins
trial
counsel
investigate
aware
wiggins
background
wiggins
emphasis
original
ounsel
aware
wiggins
unfortunate
childhood
see
least
reasonable
believe
schlaich
testimony
requires
us
respect
state
factual
determination
wiggins
trial
attorneys
aware
wiggins
background
maryland
appeals
legal
conclusion
trial
counsel
detailed
graphic
history
prepared
selvog
constitutional
deficiency
wiggins
supra
emphasis
added
unassailable
holds
alternative
wiggins
satisfied
allows
habeas
petitioner
escape
bar
relief
state
adjudication
claim
resulted
decision
based
unreasonable
determination
facts
light
evidence
presented
state
proceeding
emphasis
added
says
maryland
appeals
wrongly
claimed
wiggins
social
service
records
recorded
incidences
sexual
abuse
made
claim
true
enough
concede
wiggins
rebutted
presumption
correctness
clear
convincing
evidence
requires
clear
convincing
reading
dss
records
contain
evidence
sexual
abuse
also
assume
arguendo
state
error
unreasonable
light
evidence
presented
proceeding
given
conclusion
case
made
still
suffers
irreparable
defect
maryland
appeals
decision
based
mistaken
factual
determination
difference
make
whether
social
services
records
contained
evidence
sexual
abuse
even
decision
light
schlaich
sworn
testimony
aware
alleged
sexual
abuse
source
schlaich
knowledge
whether
obtained
dss
reports
wiggins
consequence
thing
mattered
schlaich
knew
testified
oath
knew
enough
wiggins
background
make
reasonable
proceed
without
report
social
worker
opinion
even
discuss
requirement
unreasonable
determination
facts
one
decision
based
ii
indefensible
holding
wiggins
avoided
bar
relief
alone
enough
entitle
wiggins
habeas
relief
sixth
amendment
claim
wiggins
still
must
establish
prejudiced
counsel
alleged
error
strickland
specifically
wiggins
must
demonstrate
trial
attorneys
retained
licensed
social
worker
assemble
social
history
client
reasonable
probability
attorneys
chosen
present
social
history
evidence
jury
upon
hearing
evidence
jury
spared
life
analysis
points
continues
disregard
record
determined
procession
towards
seemingly
preordained
result
reasonable
probability
investigation
altered
chosen
strategy
wiggins
trial
counsel
noted
earlier
schlaich
well
aware
without
benefit
social
history
report
wiggins
troubled
childhood
background
remains
bound
even
concluding
wiggins
satisfied
standards
state
factual
determination
wiggins
trial
attorneys
aware
wiggins
background
wiggins
aware
wiggins
unfortunate
childhood
see
wiggins
trial
attorneys
chose
however
present
evidence
wiggins
background
jury
deliberate
tactical
decision
concentrate
effort
convincing
jury
appellant
principal
killing
ms
lacs
wiggins
supra
wiggins
shown
incremental
information
hans
selvog
report
induced
counsel
change
course
schlaich
testified
oath
presenting
type
evidence
selvog
report
conflicted
chosen
defense
strategy
raise
doubts
wiggins
role
principal
wanted
avoid
shotgun
approach
jury
app
testimony
entirely
unrefuted
statement
time
trial
counsel
position
make
reasonable
strategic
choice
alleged
inadequate
investigation
ante
schlaich
presented
testimony
state
postconviction
proceedings
doubt
fully
aware
details
wiggins
background
see
app
irrelevant
whether
hypothetical
reasonable
attorney
might
introduced
evidence
alleged
sexual
abuse
ante
wiggins
attorneys
done
therefore
wiggins
prejudiced
allegedly
inadequate
investigation
simply
nothing
show
even
dare
assert
reasonable
probability
evidence
introduced
case
ante
almost
selvog
evidence
inadmissible
time
wiggins
trial
maryland
law
provides
evidence
capital
sentencing
proceeding
must
reliable
admissible
see
whittlesey
state
md
many
anecdotes
regarding
wiggins
childhood
consist
baldest
hearsay
statements
neither
taken
given
oath
subjected
even
submitted
form
signed
affidavit
consider
example
allegation
wiggins
foster
father
sexually
abused
three
times
week
sometimes
everyday
app
pet
cert
source
information
wiggins
unsworn
interview
hans
selvog
absolutely
documentation
corroboration
claim
app
allegedly
abusive
foster
parent
apparently
deceased
wiggins
however
examined
pediatrician
time
supposed
biweekly
daily
sexual
abuse
occurred
pediatrician
report
mentioned
signs
sexual
abuse
app
pet
cert
app
much
evidence
selvog
report
including
wiggins
claim
drugged
job
corps
supervisor
raped
unconscious
raped
teenage
sons
fourth
foster
home
also
undocumented
based
entirely
wiggins
treats
uncorroborated
gossip
established
ante
indeed
even
refers
powerful
evidence
assumes
wiggins
lawyers
simply
handed
hans
selvog
report
jury
nothing
truth
state
circuit
explained
rejecting
wiggins
sixth
amendment
claim
selvog
report
great
deal
difficulty
getting
evidence
maryland
licensed
maryland
report
contains
multiple
instances
hearsay
contains
many
opinions
nature
diagnosis
medical
nature
app
pet
cert
contends
selvog
report
may
admissible
ante
relying
contention
upon
whittlesey
state
supra
whittlesey
however
merely
vacated
trial
judge
decision
report
assembled
selvog
per
se
inadmissible
hearsay
grounds
remanded
determination
whether
hearsay
evidence
reliable
thus
unless
prepared
make
implausible
contention
wiggins
hearsay
statements
selvog
report
reliable
maryland
law
basis
conclusion
maryland
considers
type
evidence
sentencing
ante
state
circuit
present
case
decision
postdated
whittlesey
certainly
think
selvog
report
met
standard
reliability
app
pet
cert
assessment
undoubtedly
correct
wiggins
accounts
background
reported
selvog
hearsay
statements
convicted
murderer
trial
testimony
case
demonstrates
serial
liar
wiggins
lied
geraldine
armstrong
told
lacs
car
belongs
buddy
min
app
lied
told
police
obtained
lacs
car
credit
cards
friday
afternoon
rather
thursday
lied
armstrong
obtained
lacs
ring
ibid
knowing
information
provided
selvog
used
attack
death
sentence
wiggins
every
incentive
lie
supposed
abuse
suffered
hearsay
statements
selvog
report
pertaining
alleged
sexual
abuse
especially
dubious
reliability
maryland
courts
consistently
refused
allow
hearsay
evidence
regarding
alleged
sexual
abuse
except
statements
provided
victim
treating
physician
see
bohnert
state
md
refusing
admit
evidence
social
worker
opinion
based
child
unsubstantiated
averments
child
sexually
abused
nixon
state
md
app
child
protective
services
agent
testimony
retarded
teenager
told
agent
sexually
abused
inadmissible
hearsay
low
state
md
app
refusing
admit
evidence
examining
physician
testimony
regarding
child
statements
sexual
abuse
given
anecdotes
selvog
report
unreliable
therefore
inadmissible
way
wiggins
trial
attorneys
presented
allegations
jury
place
wiggins
witness
stand
wiggins
established
assert
reasonable
probability
done
given
dangers
saw
exposing
client
wide
range
issues
see
app
wiggins
trial
attorneys
advising
open
take
witness
stand
must
answer
question
asked
question
judge
rules
permissible
question
perception
dangers
must
surely
heightened
observation
wiggins
volatile
obnoxious
behavior
throughout
trial
see
wiggins
interrupting
judge
statement
verdict
say
ca
tell
going
go
ca
tell
wiggins
interrupting
prosecutor
opening
argument
say
going
take
kill
lady
going
sit
take
even
indulging
sake
argument
belief
selvog
report
may
admissible
ante
prejudice
discussion
simply
assumes
without
analysis
sentencing
jury
believed
report
hearsay
accounts
wiggins
statements
ante
yet
jury
learned
guilt
phase
trial
wiggins
proven
liar
see
app
wiggins
aided
credibility
jury
avoiding
witness
stand
funneling
story
social
worker
doubt
much
wiggins
jury
shared
uncritical
wholesale
acceptance
hearsay
claims
today
decision
extraordinary
even
death
different
jurisprudence
see
simmons
south
carolina
scalia
dissenting
fails
give
effect
requirement
state
factual
determinations
presumed
correct
disbelieves
sworn
testimony
member
bar
treating
hearsay
accounts
statements
convicted
murderer
established
fact
dissent
footnotes
provides
proceeding
instituted
application
writ
habeas
corpus
person
custody
pursuant
judgment
state
determination
factual
issue
made
state
shall
presumed
correct
applicant
shall
burden
rebutting
presumption
correctness
clear
convincing
evidence
incident
contained
social
history
report
schlaich
confirm
knowledge
occurrence
sexual
abuse
one
wiggins
foster
homes
knowledge
remained
unconfirmed
question
posed
asked
whether
knew
reports
abuse
foster
homes
app
record
show
schlaich
knew
incidents
degree
detail
contained
social
history
report
show
either
short
given
schlaich
testimony
basis
finding
without
knowledge
anything
social
history
report
defends
refusal
adhere
factual
determinations
ground
maryland
appeals
conclusion
scope
counsel
investigation
met
legal
standards
set
forth
strickland
represented
objectively
unreasonable
application
precedent
ante
inadequate
response
several
reasons
first
course
determining
scope
counsel
investigation
bound
accept
maryland
appeals
factual
findings
counsel
knew
wiggins
background
including
unfortunate
childhood
inadequate
response
secondly
even
concludes
petitioner
avoided
bar
relief
misapplication
strickland
alleged
mistaken
factual
assumption
counsel
learned
sexual
abuse
dss
records
ante
still
must
observe
presumption
correctness
deciding
merits
habeas
question
see
cockrell
introducing
evidence
wiggins
suffered
semiweekly
perhaps
daily
sexual
abuse
child
example
led
jury
conclude
horrible
experience
made
wiggins
precisely
type
person
perpetrate
bizarre
crime
woman
found
drowned
bathtub
apartment
clothed
missing
underwear
sprayed
black
flag
ant
roach
killer
wiggins
postconviction
lawyers
increased
credibility
anecdotes
assisted
prejudice
determination
least
wiggins
testify
oath
state
postconviction
proceedings
allegedly
abusive
childhood
perhaps
anticipating
correctly
alas
succeed
getting
vacate
jury
verdict
death
basis
rumor
innuendo
social
history
report
never
admissible
law