bowen
georgetown
university
hospital
argued
october
decided
december
medicare
program
government
reimburses
health
care
providers
expenses
incurred
providing
medical
services
medicare
beneficiaries
medicare
act
authorizes
secretary
health
human
services
secretary
promulgate
regulations
also
provides
uch
regulations
shall
ii
provide
making
suitable
retroactive
corrective
adjustments
provider
services
fiscal
period
aggregate
reimbursement
produced
methods
determining
costs
proves
either
inadequate
excessive
secretary
issued
schedule
changed
method
calculating
wage
index
factor
used
reflect
salary
levels
hospital
employees
different
parts
country
prior
rule
wage
index
given
geographic
area
calculated
using
average
salary
levels
hospitals
area
rule
excluded
computation
wages
paid
federal
government
hospitals
federal
district
invalidated
rule
suit
brought
various
hospitals
district
columbia
secretary
settled
hospitals
cost
reimbursement
reports
applying
method
secretary
reissued
rule
proceeded
recoup
sums
previously
paid
hospitals
including
respondents
result
district
ruling
exhausting
administrative
remedies
respondents
brought
suit
federal
district
claiming
retroactive
schedule
invalid
inter
alia
medicare
act
granted
summary
judgment
respondents
appeals
affirmed
held
administrative
agency
power
promulgate
regulations
limited
authority
delegated
congress
general
matter
statutory
grants
rulemaking
authority
understood
encompass
power
promulgate
retroactive
rules
unless
power
conveyed
express
terms
pp
reinstatement
rule
invalid
pp
section
authorize
retroactive
promulgation
rules
structure
language
statute
require
conclusion
clause
ii
applies
rulemaking
adjustments
reimbursement
payments
regulations
prescribing
computation
methods
reach
correct
result
individual
cases
interpretation
clause
ii
consistent
secretary
past
implementation
provision
pp
medicare
act
general
grant
authority
secretary
promulgate
rules
contains
express
authorization
retroactive
rulemaking
absence
express
authorization
weighs
heavily
secretary
position
moreover
legislative
history
provision
indicates
congress
intended
forbid
retroactive
rules
secretary
past
administrative
practice
consistent
interpretation
statute
pp
kennedy
delivered
opinion
unanimous
scalia
filed
concurring
opinion
post
richard
lazarus
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
acting
solicitor
general
ayer
assistant
attorney
general
bolton
deputy
solicitor
general
merrill
deputy
assistant
attorney
general
spears
john
cordes
mark
pennak
ronald
robertson
terry
coleman
henry
goldberg
ronald
sutter
argued
cause
respondents
brief
mary
susan
philp
thomas
hyatt
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
sisters
mercy
health
et
al
james
robinson
anthony
derezinski
american
hospital
association
linda
tomaselli
robert
klein
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
medicare
program
health
care
providers
reimbursed
government
expenses
incurred
providing
medical
services
medicare
beneficiaries
see
title
xviii
social
security
act
stat
amended
et
seq
medicare
act
congress
authorized
secretary
health
human
services
promulgate
regulations
setting
limits
levels
medicare
costs
reimbursed
question
presented
whether
secretary
may
exercise
rulemaking
authority
promulgate
cost
limits
retroactive
secretary
authority
adopt
rules
established
social
security
amendments
stat
amending
authority
first
implemented
promulgation
schedule
hospital
services
new
schedules
issued
annual
basis
thereafter
june
secretary
issued
schedule
included
technical
changes
methods
calculating
cost
limits
one
changes
affected
method
calculating
wage
index
factor
used
reflect
salary
levels
hospital
employees
different
parts
country
prior
rule
wage
index
given
geographic
area
calculated
using
average
salary
levels
hospitals
area
rule
provided
wages
paid
federal
government
hospitals
excluded
computation
fed
reg
various
hospitals
district
columbia
area
brought
suit
district
seeking
schedule
invalidated
april
district
struck
rule
concluding
secretary
violated
administrative
procedure
act
apa
et
failing
provide
notice
opportunity
public
comment
issuing
rule
see
district
columbia
hospital
assn
heckler
app
pet
cert
hereinafter
dcha
enjoin
enforcement
rule
however
finding
lacked
jurisdiction
hospitals
yet
exhausted
administrative
reimbursement
remedies
order
stated
secretary
wishes
put
place
valid
prospective
wage
index
begin
proper
notice
comment
proceedings
wage
index
currently
place
promulgated
without
notice
comment
invalid
schedule
dcha
app
pet
cert
february
secretary
published
notice
seeking
public
comment
proposal
reissue
rule
retroactive
july
fed
reg
congress
subsequently
amended
medicare
act
require
significantly
different
cost
reimbursement
procedures
readoption
modified
method
apply
exclusively
period
commencing
july
considering
comments
received
secretary
reissued
schedule
final
form
november
proceeded
recoup
sums
previously
paid
result
district
ruling
dcha
fed
reg
effect
secretary
promulgated
rule
retroactively
net
result
original
rule
never
set
aside
respondents
group
seven
hospitals
benefited
invalidation
schedule
required
return
million
reimbursement
payments
exhausting
administrative
remedies
sought
judicial
review
applicable
provisions
apa
claiming
retroactive
schedule
invalid
apa
medicare
act
district
district
columbia
granted
summary
judgment
respondents
applying
balancing
test
enunciated
retail
wholesale
department
store
union
nlrb
app
held
retroactive
application
justified
circumstances
case
secretary
appealed
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
affirmed
app
based
holding
alternative
grounds
apa
general
matter
forbids
retroactive
rulemaking
medicare
act
specific
terms
bars
retroactive
rules
granted
certiorari
affirm
ii
axiomatic
administrative
agency
power
promulgate
legislative
regulations
limited
authority
delegated
congress
determining
validity
secretary
retroactive
rule
threshold
question
whether
medicare
act
authorizes
retroactive
rulemaking
retroactivity
favored
law
thus
congressional
enactments
administrative
rules
construed
retroactive
effect
unless
language
requires
result
greene
claridge
apartments
commissioner
miller
magnolia
petroleum
principle
statutory
grant
legislative
rulemaking
authority
general
matter
understood
encompass
power
promulgate
retroactive
rules
unless
power
conveyed
congress
express
terms
see
brimstone
power
require
readjustments
past
drastic
extended
permit
unreasonably
harsh
action
without
plain
words
even
substantial
justification
retroactive
rulemaking
presented
courts
reluctant
find
authority
absent
express
statutory
grant
secretary
contends
medicare
act
provides
necessary
authority
promulgate
retroactive
rules
unusual
circumstances
case
rests
alternative
grounds
first
specific
grant
authority
promulgate
regulations
provide
making
suitable
retroactive
corrective
adjustments
ii
second
general
grant
authority
promulgate
cost
limit
rules
consider
alternatives
turn
authority
promulgate
regulations
set
forth
subparagraph
also
provides
regulations
shall
ii
provide
making
suitable
retroactive
corrective
adjustments
provider
services
fiscal
period
aggregate
reimbursement
produced
methods
determining
costs
proves
either
inadequate
excessive
ibid
section
clause
ii
part
directs
secretary
promulgate
regulations
including
rules
establishing
methods
used
determining
reasonable
costs
institutions
providers
participate
medicare
program
clause
requires
regulations
take
account
direct
indirect
costs
incurred
providers
clause
ii
mandates
regulations
include
mechanism
making
retroactive
corrective
adjustments
adjustments
required
provider
aggregate
reimbursement
produced
methods
determining
costs
low
high
terms
clause
ii
contemplates
mechanism
adjusting
reimbursement
received
provider
remainder
speaks
exclusively
plural
distinction
suggests
clause
ii
rather
permitting
modifications
rules
general
formulation
intended
authorize
inquiry
accuracy
reimbursement
determinations
individual
providers
indeed
difficult
see
corrective
adjustment
made
aggregate
reimbursement
paid
provider
without
performing
individual
examination
provider
expenditures
retrospect
conclusion
buttressed
statute
use
term
adjustments
clause
ii
regulations
shall
provide
making
adjustments
order
derive
language
authority
promulgate
rules
adjustments
regulations
must
provide
making
additional
regulations
congress
intended
secretary
promulgate
regulations
providing
issuance
amendatory
regulations
think
intent
made
explicit
also
significant
clause
ii
speaks
terms
adjusting
aggregate
reimbursement
amount
computed
one
methods
determining
costs
secretary
concedes
rules
one
methods
determining
costs
retroactive
rule
therefore
attempt
change
one
methods
yet
nothing
clause
ii
suggests
permits
changes
methods
used
compute
costs
rather
expressly
contemplates
corrective
adjustments
aggregate
amounts
reimbursement
produced
pursuant
methods
find
language
clause
ii
independent
grant
authority
promulgate
regulations
establishing
methods
determining
costs
interpretation
clause
ii
consistent
secretary
past
implementation
provision
regulations
promulgated
immediately
enactment
medicare
act
established
mechanism
making
retroactive
corrective
adjustments
remained
essentially
unchanged
throughout
periods
relevant
case
compare
cfr
cfr
regulations
provide
adjusting
amount
interim
payments
received
provider
bring
aggregate
reimbursement
line
provider
actual
reasonable
costs
regulations
expressly
contemplate
making
retroactive
corrective
adjustments
reissuance
rule
purport
provision
indeed
context
litigation
secretary
expressed
intent
characterize
rule
retroactive
corrective
adjustment
clause
ii
despite
novelty
interpretation
secretary
contends
entitled
deference
young
community
nutrition
institute
chemical
mfrs
assn
natural
resources
defense
council
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
never
applied
principle
cases
agency
litigating
positions
wholly
unsupported
regulations
rulings
administrative
practice
contrary
declined
give
deference
agency
counsel
interpretation
statute
agency
articulated
position
question
ground
congress
delegated
administrative
official
appellate
counsel
responsibility
elaborating
enforcing
statutory
commands
investment
company
institute
camp
cf
burlington
truck
lines
courts
may
accept
appellate
counsel
post
hoc
rationalizations
agency
orders
even
sanction
departure
principle
cases
far
reasoned
consistent
view
scope
clause
ii
secretary
current
interpretation
clause
ii
contrary
narrow
view
provision
advocated
past
cases
secretary
argued
clause
ii
merely
contemplates
balancing
monthly
installments
received
provider
aggregate
due
year
regents
university
california
heckler
see
also
whitecliff
cl
cert
denied
deference
appears
nothing
agency
convenient
litigating
position
entirely
inappropriate
accordingly
retroactive
rule
upheld
exercise
secretary
authority
make
retroactive
corrective
adjustments
statutory
provisions
establishing
secretary
general
rulemaking
power
contain
express
authorization
retroactive
rulemaking
light
might
shed
matter
suggestions
legislative
intent
also
indicates
authority
contemplated
first
place
congress
intended
grant
secretary
authority
act
retroactively
made
intent
explicit
discussed
ii
directs
secretary
establish
procedures
making
retroactive
corrective
adjustments
view
indication
congress
considered
need
retroactive
agency
action
absence
express
authorization
retroactive
rules
weighs
heavily
secretary
position
legislative
history
provision
directly
addresses
issue
retroactivity
discussing
authority
granted
amendments
house
senate
committee
reports
expressed
desire
forbid
retroactive
rules
proposed
new
authority
set
limits
costs
exercised
prospective
rather
retrospective
basis
provider
know
advance
limits
government
recognition
incurred
costs
opportunity
act
avoid
costs
reimbursable
see
secretary
past
administrative
practice
consistent
interpretation
statute
first
regulations
promulgated
provided
hese
limits
imposed
prospectively
cfr
although
language
dropped
subsection
regulation
revised
revised
regulation
continued
refer
prospective
periods
limits
applied
required
notice
future
cost
limits
published
federal
register
rior
beginning
cost
period
limits
applied
cfr
finally
regulations
amended
secretary
reinserted
requirement
limits
applied
prospective
effect
noting
language
inadvertently
omitted
previous
amendment
reinsertion
effect
way
develop
apply
limits
fed
reg
see
cfr
examples
similar
statements
agency
abound
every
schedule
promulgated
secretary
example
included
statement
permits
secretary
establish
prospective
limits
costs
reimbursed
medicare
secretary
administrative
rulings
also
expressed
understanding
see
beth
israel
hospital
blue
cross
shield
massachusetts
cch
medicare
medicaid
guide
secretary
nonetheless
suggests
whatever
limits
power
promulgate
retroactive
regulations
normal
course
events
judicial
invalidation
prospective
rule
unique
occurrence
creates
heightened
need
thus
justification
retroactive
curative
rulemaking
secretary
warns
congressional
intent
important
administrative
goals
may
frustrated
unless
invalidated
rule
cured
defect
made
applicable
past
time
periods
argument
advanced
countervailing
reliance
interests
less
compelling
usual
case
retroactive
rulemaking
original
invalidated
rule
provided
least
notice
individuals
entities
subject
provisions
whatever
weight
secretary
contentions
might
contexts
need
addressed
case
us
resolved
particular
statutory
scheme
question
interpretation
medicare
act
compels
conclusion
secretary
authority
promulgate
retroactive
rules
reinstatement
rule
invalid
judgment
appeals
affirmed
footnotes
clear
language
provisions
intended
implement
secretary
authority
clause
ii
regulations
also
provide
making
suitable
retroactive
adjustments
provider
submitted
fiscal
statistical
reports
retroactive
adjustment
represent
difference
amount
received
provider
year
covered
services
medicare
program
beneficiaries
amount
determined
accordance
accepted
method
cost
apportionment
actual
cost
services
rendered
beneficiaries
year
cfr
cfr
section
amendments
amended
medicare
act
state
secretary
regulations
computing
reasonable
costs
may
provide
establishment
limits
direct
indirect
overall
incurred
costs
incurred
costs
specific
items
services
groups
items
services
recognized
reasonable
based
estimates
costs
necessary
efficient
delivery
needed
health
services
individuals
covered
insurance
programs
established
subchapter
section
provides
secretary
shall
prescribe
regulations
may
necessary
carry
administration
insurance
programs
subchapter
finally
incorporates
provides
secretary
shall
full
power
authority
make
rules
regulations
inconsistent
provisions
subchapter
necessary
appropriate
carry
provisions
see
fed
reg
fed
reg
fed
reg
fed
reg
fed
reg
fed
reg
fed
reg
fed
reg
see
also
fed
reg
notice
invalidation
schedule
even
notice
proposed
rulemaking
concerning
reissuance
schedule
contained
statement
authorizes
secretary
set
prospective
limits
costs
reimbursed
medicare
fed
reg
interestingly
statement
appear
final
notice
announcing
reissuance
schedule
justice
scalia
concurring
agree
general
principles
administrative
law
suggest
medicare
act
permit
retroactive
application
secretary
health
human
service
rule
write
separately
find
incomplete
discuss
general
principles
administrative
law
without
reference
basic
structural
legislation
embodiment
principles
administrative
procedure
act
apa
agree
district
columbia
circuit
apa
independently
confirms
judgment
reached
first
part
apa
definition
rule
rule
means
whole
part
agency
statement
general
particular
applicability
future
effect
designed
implement
interpret
prescribe
law
policy
describing
organization
procedure
practice
requirements
agency
emphasis
added
future
effect
definition
mean
merely
taking
effect
future
future
effective
date
even
though
effective
altering
law
applied
past
reading
urged
secretary
health
human
services
secretary
produces
definition
rule
meaningless
since
obviously
agency
statements
future
effect
sense
take
effect
made
one
might
argue
suppose
future
effect
excludes
agency
statements
take
effect
immediately
opposed
one
second
promulgation
apart
facial
silliness
making
central
distinction
rulemaking
adjudication
hang
upon
thread
incompatible
makes
clear
certain
requirements
complied
rule
effective
immediately
thus
reading
like
one
causes
fail
central
objective
distinguish
rules
orders
orders
future
effect
sense
effective
promulgated
short
really
alternative
except
obvious
meaning
rule
statement
legal
consequences
future
first
part
definition
left
doubt
however
surely
eliminated
second
part
secretary
brief
regrettably
submerges
ellipsis
portion
set
forth
definition
continues
rule
includes
approval
prescription
future
rates
wages
corporate
financial
structures
reorganizations
thereof
prices
facilities
appliances
services
allowances
therefor
valuations
costs
accounting
practices
bearing
foregoing
emphasis
added
position
secretary
takes
litigation
accord
government
authoritative
interpretation
apa
attorney
general
manual
administrative
procedure
act
ag
manual
repeatedly
given
great
weight
see
steadman
sec
chrysler
brown
vermont
yankee
nuclear
power
natural
resources
defense
council
document
prepared
office
assistant
solicitor
general
advised
congress
latter
stages
enacting
apa
originally
issued
guide
agencies
adjusting
procedures
requirements
act
ag
manual
analysis
plainly
accord
secretary
position
particular
importance
fact
rule
includes
agency
statements
general
applicability
also
particular
applicability
applying
either
class
single
person
either
case
must
future
effect
implementing
prescribing
future
law
entire
act
based
upon
dichotomy
rule
making
adjudication
rule
making
agency
action
regulates
future
conduct
either
groups
persons
single
person
essentially
legislative
nature
operates
future
also
primarily
concerned
policy
considerations
conversely
adjudication
concerned
determination
past
present
rights
liabilities
rule
unreasonable
secondary
retroactivity
example
altering
future
regulation
manner
makes
worthless
substantial
past
investment
incurred
reliance
upon
prior
rule
may
reason
arbitrary
capricious
see
thus
invalid
reference
situations
found
many
cases
statements
effect
rule
retroactive
effects
may
nonetheless
sustained
spite
retroactivity
reasonable
general
telephone
southwest
see
also
national
assn
independent
television
producers
distributors
fcc
implication
fcc
may
consider
reasonableness
retroactive
effect
rule
clearly
wrong
erroneous
however
extend
reasonableness
inquiry
purported
rules
merely
affect
past
transactions
change
law
past
quite
simply
rule
agency
statement
future
effect
future
effect
reasonable
past
effect
profound
confusion
characterizing
secretary
approach
case
exemplified
reliance
upon
opinion
sec
chenery
even
apart
fact
case
decided
apa
nothing
issue
us
since
involved
adjudication
rather
rulemaking
thus
though
true
opinion
permitted
secretary
correction
procedural
error
caused
initial
reversal
see
sec
chenery
reach
substantive
result
retroactive
effect
utterly
crucial
distinction
chenery
involved
form
administrative
action
retroactivity
permissible
standard
adjudication
deals
law
rulemaking
deals
law
said
chenery
since
commission
unlike
ability
make
new
law
prospectively
exercise
powers
less
reason
rely
upon
ad
hoc
adjudication
formulate
new
standards
conduct
function
filling
interstices
act
performed
much
possible
promulgation
rules
applied
future
emphasis
added
although
apa
enacted
years
ago
never
directly
confronted
whether
statute
authorizes
retroactive
rules
casts
doubt
secretary
position
obviously
useful
instrument
available
agencies
one
expect
previously
occasion
review
exercise
case
government
cites
however
case
addison
holly
hill
fruit
products
case
stand
general
authority
issue
retroactive
rules
apa
enacted
much
less
authority
face
addison
involved
promulgation
definition
area
production
administrator
wage
hour
division
purposes
exemption
fair
labor
standards
act
stat
amended
et
seq
found
definition
unlawful
instead
directing
entry
judgment
employees
claiming
higher
wages
remanded
case
district
instructions
hold
administrator
making
valid
determination
area
deliberate
speed
acts
within
authority
given
congress
entirely
clear
required
determination
made
regulation
rather
declaratory
order
applicable
case
hand
interpretive
rule
held
invalid
rule
superseded
obviously
available
agency
make
law
retroactively
adjudication
courts
routinely
indicated
secretary
agriculture
done
morgan
perhaps
addison
stands
arguably
however
administrator
obliged
act
regulation
rather
adjudication
since
statutory
exemption
question
referred
area
production
defined
administrator
see
parenthetical
effect
requiring
specification
rule
rather
adjudication
authorizing
retroactive
regulation
situation
one
two
legal
commands
superseded
circumstances
either
administrator
contravene
normal
law
promulgating
retroactive
regulation
else
administrator
inaction
totally
eliminated
congressionally
prescribed
area
production
exemption
something
yield
case
involves
retroactive
rulemaking
stand
government
asserted
principle
general
permissibility
retroactive
rules
long
reasonable
rather
much
narrower
unexceptional
proposition
particular
statute
may
circumstances
implicitly
authorize
retroactive
rulemaking
case
disposed
secretary
suggests
simply
noting
retroactive
rulemaking
similar
retroactive
legislation
latter
long
upheld
constitutional
attack
reasonable
see
pension
benefit
guaranty
gray
baltimore
susquehanna
nesbit
see
generally
hochman
constitutionality
retroactive
legislation
harv
rev
issue
constitutionality
rather
whether
good
reason
doubt
apa
means
says
purposes
resolving
question
follow
since
congress
possesses
power
retroactively
change
laws
must
meant
agencies
possess
power
retroactively
change
regulations
retroactive
legislation
always
looked
upon
disfavor
see
smead
rule
retroactive
legislation
basic
principle
jurisprudence
rev
story
commentaries
constitution
ed
even
constitutionality
conditioned
upon
rationality
requirement
beyond
applied
legislation
see
pension
benefit
guaranty
supra
usery
turner
elkhorn
mining
entirely
unsurprising
therefore
even
though
congress
wields
power
unwilling
confer
upon
agencies
given
traditional
attitude
towards
retroactive
legislation
regime
established
apa
entirely
reasonable
one
action
required
agency
act
retroactive
effect
without
special
congressional
authorization
apa
says
reason
think
congress
mean
dire
consequences
secretary
predicts
ensue
reading
apa
written
justice
department
originally
interpreted
credible
years
jurisprudence
since
apa
effect
secretary
cites
one
holding
one
alternative
holding
set
forth
sustaining
retroactive
regulations
see
citizens
save
spencer
county
epa
app
national
helium
fea
temp
emerg
app
evidently
device
indispensable
efficient
government
important
note
retroactivity
limitation
applies
rulemaking
thus
legal
consequences
hinge
upon
interpretation
statutory
requirements
interpretive
rule
construing
requirements
effect
nothing
prevents
agency
acting
retroactively
adjudication
see
nlrb
bell
aerospace
sec
chenery
moreover
agency
believes
extraordinary
step
retroactive
rulemaking
crucial
need
persuade
congress
fact
obtain
necessary
ad
hoc
authorization
may
even
implicit
authorization
particular
retroactive
rulemaking
found
existing
legislation
example
statute
prescribes
deadline
particular
rules
must
effect
agency
misses
deadline
statute
may
interpreted
authorize
reasonable
retroactive
rule
despite
limitation
apa
situation
bear
similarity
addison
need
discuss
exceptions
basis
law
may
permit
agency
issue
retroactive
rule
exception
suggested
secretary
cover
present
case
basis
law
secretary
contends
evils
generally
associated
retroactivity
apply
reasonable
curative
rulemaking
correction
mistake
earlier
rulemaking
proceeding
invalidated
rule
furnished
respondents
ample
notice
standard
applied
secretary
asserts
unfair
apply
identical
rule
retroactively
shall
assume
invalidated
rule
provided
ample
notice
though
clear
makes
difference
issue
whether
retroactive
rulemaking
fair
undoubtedly
may
may
prospective
adjudication
issue
whether
permissible
form
agency
action
particular
structure
established
apa
secretary
provides
nothing
bring
within
structure
might
add
even
felt
free
construct
model
desirable
administrative
procedure
assuredly
sanction
curative
retroactivity
fully
agree
district
columbia
circuit
acceptance
secretary
position
make
mockery
apa
since
agencies
free
violate
rulemaking
requirements
apa
impunity
upon
invalidation
rule
free
reissue
rule
retroactive
basis
app
reasons
addition
stated
agree
judgment
district
columbia
circuit
must
affirmed