moragne
marine
lines
argued
march
decided
june
petitioner
foreclosed
bringing
action
federal
maritime
law
based
unseaworthiness
wrongful
death
within
state
territorial
waters
husband
longshoreman
action
law
maintainable
breach
maritime
duties
harrisburg
overruled
pp
reversed
remanded
charles
hardee
argued
cause
filed
briefs
petitioner
dewey
villareal
argued
cause
respondent
marine
lines
brief
john
boult
william
gillen
david
kerr
argued
cause
respondent
gulf
florida
terminal
brief
george
ericksen
james
mcdonough
louis
claiborne
argued
cause
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
brief
solicitor
general
griswold
assistant
attorney
general
ruckelshaus
joseph
connolly
alan
rosenthal
briefs
amici
curiae
filed
david
kaplan
american
trial
lawyers
association
nathan
baker
pro
se
justice
harlan
delivered
opinion
brought
case
consider
whether
harrisburg
held
maritime
law
afford
cause
action
wrongful
death
longer
regarded
acceptable
law
complaint
sets
forth
edward
moragne
longshoreman
killed
working
aboard
vessel
palmetto
state
navigable
waters
within
state
florida
petitioner
widow
representative
estate
brought
suit
state
respondent
marine
lines
owner
vessel
recover
damages
wrongful
death
pain
suffering
experienced
decedent
prior
death
claims
predicated
upon
negligence
unseaworthiness
vessel
marine
removed
case
federal
district
middle
district
florida
basis
diversity
citizenship
see
filed
complaint
respondent
gulf
florida
terminal
company
decedent
employer
asserting
gulf
contracted
perform
stevedoring
services
vessel
workmanlike
manner
negligence
unseaworthiness
causing
accident
resulted
gulf
operations
marine
gulf
sought
dismissal
portion
petitioner
complaint
requested
damages
wrongful
death
basis
unseaworthiness
contended
maritime
law
provided
recovery
wrongful
death
within
state
territorial
waters
statutory
right
action
death
florida
law
stat
encompass
unseaworthiness
basis
liability
district
dismissed
challenged
portion
complaint
ground
citing
decision
tungus
skovgaard
cases
construing
state
statute
made
certification
necessary
allow
petitioner
interlocutory
appeal
appeals
fifth
circuit
appeals
took
advantage
procedure
furnished
state
law
stat
certify
florida
question
whether
state
statute
allowed
recovery
unseaworthiness
concept
understood
maritime
law
reviewing
history
florida
act
state
answered
question
negative
return
case
appeals
affirmed
district
order
rejecting
petitioner
argument
entitled
reversal
federal
maritime
law
without
regard
scope
state
statute
stated
disposition
compelled
decision
tungus
granted
certiorari
invited
participate
amicus
curiae
reconsider
important
question
remedies
federal
maritime
law
tortious
deaths
state
territorial
waters
tungus
divided
consequences
flow
rule
maritime
law
absence
statute
action
wrongful
death
first
announced
harrisburg
members
agreed
death
state
territorial
waters
left
remediless
general
maritime
law
federal
statutes
remedy
may
provided
applicable
state
law
giving
right
action
death
wrongful
act
however
four
justices
dissented
holding
admiralty
adopts
state
right
action
wrongful
death
must
enforce
right
integrated
whole
whatever
conditions
limitations
creating
state
attached
dissenters
held
federal
maritime
law
utilize
state
law
supply
remedy
breaches
federally
imposed
duties
without
regard
substantive
limitations
contained
state
law
extent
role
played
state
law
tungus
subject
substantial
debate
uncertainty
see
hess
goett
union
carbide
opinions
sides
question
acknowledging
shortcomings
present
law
see
fresh
consideration
entire
subject
concluded
primary
source
confusion
found
tungus
harrisburg
latter
decision
somewhat
dubious
even
rendered
unjustifiable
anomaly
present
maritime
law
longer
followed
therefore
reverse
judgment
appeals
opinion
harrisburg
acknowledged
result
reached
little
justification
except
primitive
english
legal
history
history
far
removed
american
law
remedies
maritime
deaths
case
like
suit
behalf
family
maritime
worker
death
navigable
waters
state
following
several
precedents
lower
federal
courts
trial
awarded
damages
ship
causing
death
circuit
affirmed
ruling
death
maritime
tort
may
complained
injury
wrong
redressed
general
maritime
law
reversing
relied
primarily
recent
decision
insurance
brame
held
american
common
law
english
civil
action
lies
injury
results
death
harrisburg
brame
examine
justifications
rule
rather
simply
noted
know
country
adopted
different
rule
subject
sea
maintains
land
concluded
despite
contrary
decisions
lower
federal
courts
brame
rule
brame
apply
equally
maritime
deaths
analysis
history
rule
indicates
based
particular
set
factors
harrisburg
decided
long
since
thrown
discard
even
england
never
existed
country
regardless
viability
rule
applied
american
affairs
difficult
discern
adequate
reason
extension
admiralty
system
law
already
differentiated
many
respects
common
law
one
expect
upon
inquiry
sources
rule
find
clear
compelling
justification
seems
striking
departure
result
dictated
elementary
principles
law
remedies
existing
law
imposes
primary
duty
violations
compensable
cause
injury
nothing
ordinary
notions
justice
suggests
violation
nonactionable
simply
serious
enough
cause
death
contrary
rule
criticized
ever
since
inception
described
terms
barbarous
osborn
gillett
ex
lord
bramwell
dissenting
pollock
law
torts
landon
ed
holdsworth
history
english
law
ed
primary
duty
already
exists
decision
whether
allow
recovery
violations
causing
death
entirely
remedial
matter
true
harms
assuaged
identical
two
cases
case
mere
injury
person
physically
harmed
made
whole
harm
case
death
closest
usually
spouse
children
seek
recover
total
loss
one
depended
difference
however
even
coupled
practical
difficulties
defining
class
beneficiaries
may
recover
death
seem
account
law
refusal
recognize
wrongful
killing
actionable
tort
one
expects
therefore
find
persuasive
independent
justification
apparent
legal
anomaly
legal
historians
concluded
sole
substantial
basis
rule
common
law
feature
early
english
law
survive
century
doctrine
see
pollock
supra
holdsworth
origin
rule
baker
bolton
rev
according
doctrine
common
law
allow
civil
recovery
act
constituted
tort
felony
tort
treated
less
important
offense
crown
merged
felony
smith
sykes
freem
eng
higgins
butcher
yel
eng
doctrine
found
practical
justification
fact
punishment
felony
death
felon
forfeiture
property
crown
thus
crime
punished
nothing
remained
felon
property
base
civil
action
since
intentional
negligent
homicide
felonious
civil
suit
wrongful
death
first
explicit
statement
rule
recovery
wrongful
death
came
opinion
lord
ellenborough
sitting
nisi
prius
baker
bolton
camp
eng
opinion
cite
authority
give
supporting
reasoning
refer
doctrine
announcing
civil
death
human
complained
injury
ibid
doctrine
seemingly
cited
basis
denial
recovery
reported
cases
since
earliest
ones
century
smith
sykes
supra
higgins
butcher
supra
however
seems
clear
first
cases
rule
baker
bolton
derive
doctrine
ground
might
supported
even
time
inception
house
lords
confirmed
historical
derivation
held
although
doctrine
longer
part
law
rule
recovery
wrongful
death
continue
except
modified
statute
admiralty
commissioners
amerika
lord
parker
opinion
acknowledged
rule
anomalous
scientific
jurist
concluded
found
justification
doctrine
trespass
drowned
felony
continue
rule
explicable
historical
grounds
even
disappearance
justification
see
holdsworth
history
english
law
ed
lord
summer
agreed
relying
part
fact
adopted
english
rule
brame
although
conceding
force
lord
bramwell
dissent
osborn
gillett
ex
rule
lord
parker
stated
part
functions
house
consider
rules
prevail
logical
scientific
system
jurisprudence
thus
bound
simply
follow
past
decisions
historical
justification
marshaled
rule
england
never
existed
country
limited
instances
american
law
adopt
vestige
doctrine
effect
civil
action
delayed
criminal
trial
however
country
felony
punishment
include
forfeiture
property
therefore
nothing
even
limited
instances
bar
subsequent
civil
suit
grosso
delaware
lackawanna
west
hyatt
adams
see
prosser
law
torts
ed
nevertheless
despite
early
cases
rule
rejected
incapable
vindication
sullivan
union
pac
cas
neb
shields
yonge
cf
cross
guthery
root
american
courts
generally
adopted
english
rule
common
law
country
well
throughout
period
adoption
culminating
decision
brame
courts
failed
produce
satisfactory
justification
applying
rule
country
courts
explained
holdings
prompted
asserted
difficulty
computation
damages
wrongful
death
repugnance
setting
price
upon
human
life
connecticut
mut
life
ins
new
york
hyatt
adams
supra
however
courts
recognized
calculation
loss
sustained
dependents
estate
deceased
required
present
statutes
see
smith
wrongful
death
damages
north
carolina
rev
nn
present
difficulties
insurmountable
assessment
damages
many
nonfatal
personal
injuries
see
hollyday
david
reeves
cas
md
green
hudson
river
barb
suggested
courts
commentators
prohibition
nonstatutory
actions
derived
support
ancient
rule
personal
cause
action
tort
survive
death
possessor
eden
lexington
frankfort
decision
baker
bolton
may
influenced
principle
holdsworth
origin
rule
baker
bolton
rev
however
universally
recognized
principle
pertains
victim
personal
claims
pain
suffering
bearing
question
whether
dependent
permitted
recover
injury
suffers
victim
death
see
ibid
pollock
supra
winfield
death
affecting
liability
tort
rev
likely
reason
english
rule
adopted
country
without
much
question
simply
blessing
age
thrust
opinion
brame
well
many
lower
opinions
grosso
delaware
lackawanna
west
supra
nearly
automatic
adoption
seems
odds
general
principle
widely
accepted
early
years
nation
ur
ancestors
brought
general
principles
common
law
claimed
birthright
brought
adopted
portion
applicable
situation
van
ness
pacard
pet
story
lottawanna
wall
see
pound
formative
era
american
law
hart
sacks
legal
process
tent
ed
american
courts
never
made
inquiry
whether
particular
english
rule
bitterly
criticized
england
applicable
situation
difficult
imagine
basis
might
concluded
even
decision
brame
apparent
harrisburg
concluded
different
rule
admiralty
applied
common
law
maritime
law
always
country
england
thing
apart
common
law
large
extent
administered
different
courts
owed
much
greater
debt
civil
law
focus
particular
subject
matter
developed
general
principles
unknown
common
law
principles
included
special
solicitude
welfare
men
undertook
venture
upon
hazardous
unpredictable
sea
voyages
see
generally
gilmore
black
law
admiralty
edelman
maritime
injury
death
factors
suggest
might
anomaly
adoption
different
rule
govern
maritime
relations
rule
criticized
unjust
domain
might
wisely
rejected
incompatible
law
sea
conclusion
reached
chief
justice
chase
prior
harrisburg
sitting
circuit
sea
gull
cas
md
remarked
cases
indeed
held
suit
law
redress
surviving
representative
injuries
occasioned
death
one
wrong
another
cases
common
law
peculiar
rules
relation
subject
traceable
feudal
system
forfeitures
certainly
better
becomes
humane
liberal
character
proceedings
admiralty
give
withhold
remedy
required
withhold
established
inflexible
rules
ii
need
however
pronounce
verdict
whether
harrisburg
decided
correct
extrapolation
principles
decisional
law
existence
development
major
significance
intervened
making
clear
rule
recovery
wrongful
death
sharply
keeping
policies
modern
american
maritime
law
development
wholesale
abandonment
rule
areas
held
sway
quite
evidently
prompted
sense
rule
injustice
generated
much
criticism
original
promulgation
extent
rejection
judicial
english
house
lords
emasculated
rule
without
expressly
overruling
rose
ford
lord
atkin
remarked
decision
amerika
reasons
given
whether
historical
otherwise
may
seem
unsatisfactory
rule
really
based
relevant
death
due
felony
long
ago
relegated
museum
rate
saw
reason
extending
illogical
doctrine
case
clearly
apply
lord
atkin
concluded
doctrine
barred
recognition
claim
dependents
wrongful
death
person
bar
recognition
claim
decedent
loss
expectation
life
claim
vested
person
interval
injury
death
thereupon
passed
aid
survival
statute
representative
estate
expressed
doubt
claim
capable
estimated
terms
money
calculation
made
thus
except
measure
damages
might
differ
representative
allowed
recover
behalf
heirs
recover
names
much
earlier
however
legislatures
england
began
evidence
unanimous
disapproval
rule
recovery
wrongful
death
first
statute
partially
abrogating
rule
lord
campbell
act
granted
recovery
families
persons
killed
tortious
conduct
although
death
shall
caused
circumstances
amount
law
felony
every
state
today
enacted
statute
see
smith
supra
rev
congress
created
actions
wrongful
deaths
railroad
employees
federal
employers
liability
act
merchant
seamen
jones
act
persons
high
seas
death
high
seas
act
congress
also
federal
tort
claims
act
made
subject
liability
certain
circumstances
negligently
caused
wrongful
death
extent
private
person
see
richards
numerous
broadly
applicable
statutes
taken
whole
make
clear
present
public
policy
allowing
recovery
wrongful
death
statutes
evidence
wide
rejection
legislatures
whatever
justifications
may
existed
general
refusal
allow
recovery
legislative
establishment
policy
carries
significance
beyond
particular
scope
statutes
involved
policy
thus
established
become
part
law
given
appropriate
weight
matters
statutory
construction
also
decisional
law
see
landis
statutes
sources
law
harvard
legal
essays
justice
holmes
speaking
also
chief
justice
taft
justices
brandeis
mckenna
stated
topic
remedies
wrongful
death
seems
courts
dealing
statutes
sometimes
slow
recognize
statutes
even
terms
covering
particular
cases
may
imply
policy
different
common
law
therefore
may
exclude
reference
common
law
purpose
limiting
scope
johnson
fed
without
going
reasons
notion
action
appeal
lie
causing
death
human
enough
say
disappeared
policy
forbade
action
profound
absence
remedy
man
body
hanged
goods
confiscated
felony
shown
policy
present
law
statutes
panama
rock
dissenting
opinion
appreciation
broader
role
played
legislation
development
law
reflects
practices
courts
ancient
times
professor
landis
said
much
ordinarily
regarded
common
law
finds
source
legislative
enactment
landis
supra
always
duty
perceive
impact
major
legislative
innovations
interweave
new
legislative
policies
inherited
body
principles
many
deriving
earlier
legislative
exertions
legislature
course
merely
enact
general
policies
terms
statute
also
indicates
conception
sphere
within
policy
effect
many
cases
scope
statute
may
reflect
nothing
dimensions
particular
problem
came
attention
legislature
inviting
conclusion
legislative
policy
equally
applicable
situations
mischief
identical
conclusion
reinforced
exists
one
enactment
course
legislation
dealing
series
situations
generality
underlying
principle
attested
legislation
jurisdictions
hand
legislature
may
order
promote
conflicting
interests
prescribe
particularity
compass
legislative
aim
erecting
strong
inference
territories
beyond
boundaries
drawn
feel
impact
new
legislative
dispensation
must
therefore
analyze
care
congressional
enactments
abrogated
rule
maritime
field
determine
impact
fact
none
applies
terms
situation
case
see
part
iii
infra
however
sufficient
point
conclude
justice
holmes
years
ago
work
legislatures
made
allowance
recovery
wrongful
death
general
rule
american
law
denial
exception
death
caused
breach
duty
imposed
federal
maritime
law
congress
established
policy
favoring
recovery
absence
legislative
direction
except
particular
class
cases
iii
undertaking
therefore
determine
whether
congress
given
direction
legislation
granting
remedies
wrongful
deaths
portions
maritime
domain
find
congress
given
affirmative
indication
intent
preclude
judicial
allowance
remedy
wrongful
death
persons
situation
petitioner
date
harrisburg
remedy
death
high
seas
caused
breach
one
duties
imposed
federal
maritime
law
deaths
within
state
territorial
waters
federal
law
accommodated
humane
policies
state
wrongful
death
statutes
allowing
recovery
whenever
applicable
state
statute
favored
recovery
congress
acted
furnish
remedy
denied
courts
deaths
beyond
jurisdiction
state
passing
two
landmark
statutes
first
death
high
seas
act
stat
et
seq
section
act
provides
whenever
death
person
shall
caused
wrongful
act
neglect
default
occurring
high
seas
beyond
marine
league
shore
state
personal
representative
decedent
may
maintain
suit
damages
district
courts
admiralty
exclusive
benefit
decedent
wife
husband
parent
child
dependent
relative
vessel
person
corporation
liable
death
ensued
provisions
state
statute
giving
regulating
rights
action
remedies
death
shall
affected
act
shall
act
apply
great
lakes
waters
within
territorial
limits
state
participating
amicus
curiae
contended
oral
argument
statutes
construed
forbid
recognition
general
maritime
remedy
wrongful
death
within
territorial
waters
perpetuate
three
anomalies
present
law
first
simply
discrepancy
produced
whenever
rule
harrisburg
holds
sway
within
territorial
waters
identical
conduct
violating
federal
law
furnishing
unseaworthy
vessel
produces
liability
victim
merely
injured
frequently
killed
concluded
distinction
compatible
general
policies
federal
maritime
law
second
incongruity
identical
breaches
duty
provide
seaworthy
ship
resulting
death
produce
liability
outside
limit
since
claim
death
high
seas
act
may
founded
unseaworthiness
see
kernan
american
dredging
within
territorial
waters
state
whose
local
statute
excludes
unseaworthiness
claims
argues
since
substantive
duty
federal
federal
maritime
jurisdiction
covers
navigable
waters
within
without
limit
rational
policy
supports
distinction
availability
remedy
third
assertedly
strangest
anomaly
true
seaman
member
ship
company
covered
jones
act
provided
remedy
death
caused
unseaworthiness
within
territorial
waters
longshoreman
duty
seaworthiness
extended
performs
work
traditionally
done
seamen
remedy
allowed
state
statute
much
force
argument
distinctions
lacking
apparent
justification
absence
compelling
evidence
presume
congress
affirmatively
intended
freeze
maritime
law
presumption
congress
removed
traditional
responsibility
vindicate
policies
maritime
law
ceding
function
exclusively
however
respondents
argue
intent
manifested
portions
death
high
seas
act
quoted
legislative
history
act
suggests
respondents
misconceive
thrust
congressional
concern
senate
house
reports
consist
primarily
quoted
remarks
supporters
proposed
act
supporters
stated
rule
harrisburg
rejected
country
western
europe
disgrace
civilized
people
reason
admiralty
law
longer
depend
statute
laws
congress
bring
maritime
law
line
laws
enlightened
nations
confer
right
action
death
sea
act
accomplish
result
deaths
high
seas
leaving
unimpaired
rights
state
statutes
deaths
waters
within
territorial
jurisdiction
purpose
uniformity
properly
legislate
high
seas
discussion
bill
floor
house
evidenced
concern
cause
action
provided
cases
remedy
cong
rec
time
power
create
actions
wrongful
death
way
affected
enactment
federal
law
tungus
skovgaard
read
light
state
maritime
law
believe
legislative
history
indicates
congress
intended
ensure
continued
availability
remedy
historically
provided
deaths
territorial
waters
failure
extend
act
cover
deaths
primarily
reflected
lack
necessity
coverage
federal
statute
rather
affirmative
desire
insulate
deaths
benefits
federal
remedy
might
available
independently
act
void
existed
maritime
law
absence
remedy
wrongful
death
high
seas
congress
acting
fill
void
legislated
limit
extent
problem
express
provision
state
remedies
territorial
waters
disturbed
act
ensured
congress
solution
one
problem
create
another
inviting
courts
find
act
entire
field
destroying
state
remedies
previously
existed
beneficiaries
persons
meeting
death
territorial
waters
suffer
time
excluded
coverage
act
contrary
state
remedies
left
undisturbed
familiar
also
may
actually
generous
remedy
provided
new
act
one
hand
primary
basis
recovery
state
statutes
negligence
hand
substantive
duties
imposed
time
general
maritime
law
vastly
different
presently
exist
seaman
right
recover
damages
injuries
caused
unseaworthiness
ship
obscure
relatively
little
used
remedy
perhaps
largely
prior
decision
mahnich
southern
shipowner
duty
use
due
diligence
provide
seaworthy
ship
gilmore
black
supra
tetreault
seamen
seaworthiness
rights
harbor
workers
cornell
nonseamen
high
seas
generally
recover
ordinary
negligence
even
virtually
denied
seamen
peculiar
maritime
doctrine
osceola
congress
thus
legislated
backdrop
state
laws
imposed
standard
behavior
generally
respects
perhaps
favorable
imposed
federal
maritime
law
since
time
equation
changed
drastically
transformation
shipowner
duty
provide
seaworthy
ship
absolute
duty
satisfied
due
diligence
see
mahnich
southern
supra
mitchell
trawler
racer
unseaworthiness
doctrine
become
principal
vehicle
recovery
seamen
injury
death
overshadowing
negligence
action
made
available
jones
act
see
gilmore
black
supra
achieved
equal
importance
longshoremen
harbor
workers
duty
seaworthiness
extended
perform
work
vessel
traditionally
done
seamen
seas
shipping
sieracki
resulting
discrepancy
remedies
deaths
covered
death
high
seas
act
deaths
happen
fall
within
state
statute
encompassing
unseaworthiness
foreseen
congress
congress
merely
declined
disturb
state
remedies
time
appeared
adequate
effectuate
substantive
duties
imposed
general
maritime
law
action
read
instruction
federal
courts
deaths
territorial
waters
caused
breaches
evolving
duty
seaworthiness
must
damnum
absque
injuria
unless
expand
remedies
match
scope
federal
duty
put
another
way
message
act
force
abrogate
available
state
remedies
intention
appears
act
effect
foreclosing
nonstatutory
federal
remedies
might
found
appropriate
effectuate
policies
general
maritime
law
conclusion
wholly
consistent
congressional
purpose
confirmed
passage
jones
act
almost
simultaneously
death
high
seas
act
observed
gillespie
steel
jones
act
intended
achieve
uniformity
exercise
admiralty
jurisdiction
giving
seamen
federal
right
recover
employers
negligence
regardless
location
injury
death
strong
concern
uniformity
scarcely
consistent
conclusion
congress
intended
require
present
nonuniformity
effectuation
duty
provide
seaworthy
ship
recognition
right
recover
wrongful
death
general
maritime
law
assure
uniform
vindication
federal
policies
removing
tensions
discrepancies
resulted
necessity
accommodate
state
remedial
statutes
exclusively
maritime
substantive
concepts
hess
goett
union
carbide
uniformity
concerns
acts
also
give
effect
constitutionally
based
principle
federal
admiralty
law
system
law
coextensive
operating
uniformly
whole
country
lottawanna
wall
conclude
death
high
seas
act
intended
preclude
availability
remedy
wrongful
death
general
maritime
law
situations
covered
act
refusal
maritime
law
provide
remedy
appears
jurisprudentially
unsound
produced
serious
confusion
hardship
refusal
cease
unless
substantial
countervailing
factors
dictate
adherence
harrisburg
simply
matter
stare
decisis
turn
consideration
factors
iv
weighty
considerations
underlie
principle
courts
lightly
overrule
past
decisions
among
desirability
law
furnish
clear
guide
conduct
individuals
enable
plan
affairs
assurance
untoward
surprise
importance
furthering
fair
expeditious
adjudication
eliminating
need
relitigate
every
relevant
proposition
every
case
necessity
maintaining
public
faith
judiciary
source
impersonal
reasoned
judgments
reasons
rejecting
established
rule
must
always
weighed
factors
first
factor
often
considered
mainstay
stare
decisis
singularly
absent
case
confidence
people
ability
predict
legal
consequences
actions
vitally
necessary
facilitate
planning
primary
activity
encourage
settlement
disputes
without
resort
courts
however
confidence
threatened
least
announcement
new
remedial
rule
effectuate
primary
rules
behavior
question
case
change
duties
owed
shipowners
work
aboard
vessels
shipowners
well
understand
breach
duty
provide
seaworthy
ship
may
subject
liability
injury
regardless
occurs
death
occurring
high
seas
territorial
waters
hardly
said
shipowners
molded
conduct
around
possibility
special
circumstances
may
escape
liability
breach
rather
established
expectations
ships
work
duty
make
ship
seaworthy
breach
federally
imposed
duty
generally
provide
basis
recovery
exceptional
denial
recovery
disturbs
expectations
new
remedial
doctrine
serves
simply
reenforce
make
effectual
primary
obligations
net
result
innovation
may
strengthen
rather
disturb
general
sense
security
hart
sacks
supra
pound
thoughts
stare
decisis
nacca
either
relevant
strands
stare
decisis
counsel
persuasively
overruling
harrisburg
certainly
courts
provide
expeditious
resolution
disputes
every
rule
fair
game
de
novo
reconsideration
every
case
however
situation
face
far
removed
consequence
regard
rule
harrisburg
closely
arguable
proposition
rested
dubious
foundation
announced
become
increasingly
unjustifiable
anomaly
law
years
left
behind
conjunction
corollary
tungus
produced
confusion
area
easily
susceptible
workable
solutions
rule
long
opportunity
prove
acceptability
instead
suffered
universal
criticism
wide
repudiation
supplant
present
disarray
area
rule
simpler
impede
efficiency
adjudication
finally
judicious
reconsideration
precedent
threatening
public
faith
judiciary
continued
adherence
rule
unjustified
reason
produces
different
results
breaches
duty
situations
differentiated
policy
respect
process
adjudication
enhanced
diminished
ruling
today
respondents
argue
overruling
harrisburg
necessitate
long
course
decisions
spell
elements
new
cause
action
believe
fears
exaggerated
decision
require
fashioning
whole
new
body
federal
law
merely
removes
bar
access
existing
general
maritime
law
respects
law
applied
cases
answer
questions
arise
death
cases
respondents
argue
example
statute
limitations
must
devised
borrowed
new
claim
however
petitioner
respond
since
simply
removed
barrier
general
maritime
actions
fatal
injuries
reason
federal
admiralty
suits
least
actions
share
doctrine
laches
immemorially
applied
admiralty
claims
applying
doctrine
argument
runs
courts
give
consideration
statute
limitations
death
high
seas
act
always
looked
analogy
appropriate
state
foreign
statutes
limitations
see
kenney
trinidad
cir
gilmore
black
supra
need
decide
question
present
case
brought
within
months
accident
question
timeliness
raised
argument
demonstrates
however
difficulties
slight
applying
accepted
maritime
law
actions
wrongful
death
one
aspect
claim
wrongful
death
precise
counterpart
established
law
governing
nonfatal
injuries
determination
beneficiaries
entitled
recover
general
maritime
law
denied
recovery
wrongful
death
found
need
specify
dependents
receive
recovery
question
petitioner
argue
may
look
guidance
expressions
congress
spoken
subject
death
high
seas
act
jones
act
longshoremen
harbor
workers
compensation
act
though
similar
provisions
differs
slightly
naming
dependent
relatives
may
recover
priority
given
claims
contends
three
provision
borrowed
actions
general
maritime
law
death
high
seas
act
congressional
enactment
deals
specifically
exclusively
actions
wrongful
death
simply
provides
remedy
deaths
high
seas
breaches
duties
imposed
general
maritime
law
contrast
beneficiary
provisions
jones
act
applicable
specific
class
actions
claims
seamen
employers
based
violations
special
standard
negligence
imposed
federal
employers
liability
act
standard
appears
unlike
imposed
general
maritime
law
although
longshoremen
harbor
workers
compensation
act
applicable
longshoremen
petitioner
late
husband
principles
recovery
wholly
foreign
general
maritime
law
like
workmen
compensation
laws
deals
responsibilities
employers
death
injury
employees
provides
standardized
amounts
compensation
regardless
fault
part
employer
one
statutes
applies
class
workers
person
bases
liability
conduct
violative
general
maritime
law
death
high
seas
act
borrowing
schedule
beneficiaries
argues
effectuate
expressed
congressional
preferences
area
also
promote
uniformity
ensuring
beneficiaries
identical
torts
rather
varying
employment
status
decedent
occasion
according
argument
borrow
law
relevant
coastal
state
since
underlying
duties
effectuated
entirely
federal
congress
expressed
preference
beneficiaries
violations
maritime
law
determine
issue
think
final
resolution
await
sifting
lower
courts
future
litigation
present
purposes
conclude
existence
affords
sufficient
reason
coming
grips
harrisburg
still
subsidiary
issues
require
resolution
particular
questions
measure
damages
courts
without
persuasive
analogy
guidance
death
high
seas
act
numerous
state
acts
implemented
success
decades
experience
thus
built
counsels
suit
wrongful
death
raises
problems
unlike
long
grist
judicial
mill
sum
contrast
torrent
difficult
litigation
swirled
harrisburg
tungus
followed
upon
problems
accommodation
occasioned
recognition
remedy
wrongful
death
general
maritime
law
expected
bring
placid
waters
prospect
indeed
makes
discarding
harrisburg
accordingly
overrule
harrisburg
hold
action
lie
general
maritime
law
death
caused
violation
maritime
duties
judgment
appeals
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
brame
decided
course
time
federal
courts
swift
tyson
pet
expounded
general
federal
common
law
stated
argument
everywhere
support
suits
admiralty
maritime
law
actually
administered
common
law
countries
different
common
law
particular
common
law
founded
good
reason
contrary
equity
general
principles
law
since
however
established
courts
action
law
maintained
wrong
absence
statute
giving
right
shown
maritime
law
accepted
received
maritime
nations
generally
established
different
rule
government
courts
admiralty
govern
courts
law
matters
kind
forced
conclusion
action
lie
courts
general
maritime
law
decision
amerika
placed
also
alternative
ground
independently
sufficient
case
arose
collision
royal
navy
submarine
private
vessel
crown
sought
recover
owners
private
vessel
pensions
payable
families
navy
sailors
died
collision
first
ground
given
rejecting
claim
damages
sought
remote
protected
tort
law
pensions
voluntary
payments
measure
future
services
admiralty
deprived
similar
alternative
reasoning
given
brame
involved
similar
situation
thus
neither
case
enunciation
rule
recovery
wrongful
death
necessary
result
harrisburg
acknowledged
least
according
courts
france
civil
law
allow
recovery
injury
suffered
dependents
person
killed
noted
however
louisiana
courts
took
different
view
civil
law
english
maritime
law
seem
differ
regard
english
common
law
see
generally
grigsby
coast
marine
service
cir
benedict
law
american
admiralty
ed
knauth
lord
wright
concurring
stated
one
sense
true
money
compensation
life
enjoyment
life
sense
impossible
fix
compensation
shortening
life
best
law
paradoxical
law
refused
give
compensation
none
adequate
suggested
one
reason
rule
tolerated
england
long
may
relatives
persons
killed
wrongful
acts
often
able
exact
compensation
wrongdoer
threatening
bring
criminal
appeal
criminal
appeal
criminal
proceeding
brought
private
person
many
years
common
indictment
means
punishing
homicide
though
successful
appeal
produce
monetary
recovery
threat
one
served
informal
substitute
civil
suit
damages
years
indictment
became
common
criminal
appeal
abolished
statute
geo
see
holdsworth
origin
rule
baker
bolton
rev
admiralty
commissioners
amerika
see
also
national
parks
act
outer
continental
shelf
lands
act
making
state
statutes
applicable
particular
areas
within
federal
jurisdiction
cf
infra
rock
case
involved
question
whether
action
wrongful
death
maintainable
panama
canal
zone
general
statute
simply
embodied
principle
liability
damage
caused
fault
majority
decision
engrafting
onto
statute
rule
forbidding
recovery
despite
fact
rule
rejected
every
relevant
jurisdiction
immediately
repudiated
congressional
action
act
stat
see
landis
supra
general
understanding
statutes
coastal
provided
remedies
deaths
within
territorial
waters
apply
beyond
state
boundaries
suggested
early
case
plaintiff
defendant
state
law
state
applied
death
high
seas
state
intended
law
scope
hamilton
however
probably
state
death
statutes
meant
application
high
seas
possibility
little
fill
vacuum
congress
passed
longshoremen
harbor
workers
compensation
act
stat
et
granting
longshoremen
right
receive
workmen
compensation
benefits
employers
accidental
injury
death
arising
employment
benefits
made
exclusive
liability
employers
comply
act
act
however
affect
longshoreman
remedies
persons
employer
shipowner
therefore
bear
problem
us
except
perhaps
serve
yet
another
example
congressional
action
allow
recovery
death
circumstances
recovery
allowed
nonfatal
injuries
joint
contributor
last
situation
conjunction
rule
harrisburg
decision
gillespie
steel
held
jones
act
providing
claim
wrongful
death
based
negligence
precludes
state
remedy
wrongful
death
seaman
territorial
waters
whether
based
negligence
unseaworthiness
ruling
gillespie
jones
act
intended
bring
uniformity
exercise
admiralty
jurisdiction
required
constitution
necessarily
supersedes
application
death
statutes
several
ruling
thus
disturb
seaman
rights
general
maritime
law
existing
alongside
jones
act
claim
sue
employer
injuries
caused
unseaworthiness
see
mcallister
magnolia
petroleum
death
high
seas
caused
unseaworthiness
see
kernan
american
dredging
doyle
albatross
tanker
cir
cf
pope
talbot
hawn
likewise
remedy
general
maritime
law
made
available
overruling
today
harrisburg
seems
beyond
preclusive
effect
jones
act
interpreted
gillespie
existence
maritime
remedy
deaths
seamen
territorial
waters
rather
hinder
uniformity
exercise
admiralty
jurisdiction
course
question
preclusion
federal
remedy
gillespie
predecessor
lindgren
since
remedy
thought
exist
time
cases
decided
see
gilmore
black
supra
cf
kernan
american
dredging
similarly
parliament
abrogated
english
rule
passing
lord
campbell
act
provided
nothing
therein
contained
shall
apply
part
kingdom
called
scotland
decisional
law
scotland
long
recognized
right
recover
wrongful
death
thus
mischief
statute
aimed
cured
without
disturbing
scottish
law
act
excluded
scotland
operation
sufficient
remedy
already
existed
england
none
existed
admiralty
commissioners
amerika
note
act
authorizes
suit
damages
district
courts
admiralty
construed
place
exclusive
jurisdiction
admiralty
side
federal
courts
suits
act
devlin
flying
tiger
lines
supp
although
earlier
authority
contrary
bugden
trawler
cambridge
mass
found
legislative
history
congress
imposed
exclusive
jurisdiction
desire
avoid
presentation
claims
juries
might
support
inference
congress
meant
forbid
nonstatutory
maritime
actions
wrongful
death
might
come
state
federal
juries
cf
fitzgerald
lines
however
case
discussion
exclusive
jurisdiction
legislative
history
found
house
floor
debates
course
representative
volstead
floor
manager
bill
chairman
judiciary
committee
told
members
exclusive
jurisdiction
follow
necessarily
fact
act
part
federal
maritime
law
cong
rec
erroneous
view
disregards
saving
clause
fact
federal
maritime
law
applicable
suits
brought
state
courts
permission
clause
see
supra
asked
whether
true
jury
trials
never
available
suits
act
representative
volstead
replied
think
perhaps
certain
purposes
practice
prevails
may
jury
ordinarily
jury
allowed
however
know
much
admiralty
practice
cong
rec
derive
expression
policy
bearing
matter
discussion
incongruity
forcing
provide
sole
remedy
effectuate
duties
basis
state
policy
highlighted
case
florida
ruled
state
act
concerned
traditional
concepts
concepts
peculiar
maritime
law
comparative
negligence
rule
found
reason
believe
florida
legislature
intended
cover
even
considered
completely
foreign
maritime
duty
seaworthiness
federal
law
rather
state
appropriate
source
remedy
violation
federally
imposed
duties
maritime
law
cf
hill
power
federal
courts
constitutional
rev
note
federal
common
law
harv
rev
worth
noting
problem
lack
congruence
maritime
duties
state
remedies
presented
harrisburg
problem
relevant
state
statutes
limitations
run
petitioner
sought
federal
remedy
applicable
discuss
standards
behavior
comprehended
state
law
maritime
law
nothing
indicates
state
law
wholly
adequate
vindicate
substantive
maritime
policies
suit
brought
within
period
cf
mcallister
magnolia
petroleum
respondents
purport
find
preclusive
intent
two
federal
statutes
related
areas
national
parks
act
outer
continental
shelf
lands
act
former
provides
case
death
person
neglect
wrongful
act
another
within
national
park
place
subject
exclusive
jurisdiction
within
exterior
boundaries
state
right
action
shall
exist
though
place
jurisdiction
state
within
whose
exterior
boundaries
place
may
although
judge
learned
hand
suggested
statute
applied
admiralty
puleo
moss
quickly
reconsidered
guerrini
seems
clear
see
tungus
skovgaard
separate
opinion
brennan
aetna
cas
sur
congressional
decision
place
state
laws
areas
national
parks
carved
existing
state
territories
subject
general
body
law
carries
implication
similar
intent
vastly
different
realm
admiralty
latter
statute
rodrigue
aetna
cas
sur
supra
determined
act
intended
treat
artificial
islands
located
beyond
limit
vessels
upon
high
seas
though
federal
enclaves
upland
state
act
deliberately
eschewed
application
admiralty
principles
novel
structures
held
subject
substantive
standards
state
law
except
inconsistent
federal
law
applied
special
dispensation
modern
problem
maritime
law
thought
inapposite
analogue
case
undisputed
duties
owed
respondents
petitioner
husband
determined
maritime
law
within
without
limit
respondents
point
bill
introduced
senate
request
among
things
extend
death
high
seas
act
include
deaths
state
territorial
waters
sess
date
hearings
scheduled
action
taken
bill
mere
possibility
future
legislation
field
course
affect
legal
merits
petitioner
claim
rule
harrisburg
longer
valid
part
maritime
law
see
webb
think
congress
failure
take
action
pending
bill
pass
similar
measure
years
law
deaths
territorial
waters
became
incongruous
provides
guidance
course
take
case
conclude
congress
legislating
subject
effect
foreclosed
negative
legislation
reconsideration
prior
judicial
doctrine
disregard
fact
congress
largely
left
responsibility
fashioning
controlling
rules
admiralty
law
fitzgerald
lines
see
mcallister
magnolia
petroleum
see
see
supra