barnhart
commissioner
social
security
sigmon
coal
et
argued
november
decided
february
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
coal
act
act
restructured
system
providing
private
health
care
benefits
coal
industry
retirees
act
merged
benefit
plans
created
pursuant
agreements
mine
workers
america
umwa
coal
operators
new
multiemployer
plan
called
umwa
combined
benefit
fund
combined
fund
see
fund
financed
annual
premiums
assessed
signatory
coal
operators
signed
agreement
requiring
contributions
benefits
plans
signatory
longer
business
act
assigns
liability
beneficiaries
defined
group
related
persons
see
act
charges
commissioner
social
security
assigning
eligible
beneficiary
signatory
operator
related
persons
identifies
specific
categories
signatory
operators
related
persons
requires
commissioner
assign
beneficiaries
among
categories
particular
order
ibid
ensures
beneficiary
remains
unassigned
existing
company
falls
within
categories
benefits
financed
combined
fund
see
shortly
respondent
jericol
mining
jericol
formed
irdell
mining
irdell
another
company
purchased
coal
mining
operating
assets
shackleford
coal
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
business
among
things
assumed
responsibility
shackleford
agreement
umwa
common
ownership
irdell
shackleford
irdell
subsequently
changed
name
operating
shackleford
coal
changed
name
jericol
commissioner
assigned
premium
responsibility
retired
miners
jericol
determining
successor
successor
interest
original
shackleford
jericol
qualified
related
person
shackleford
retirees
worked
shackleford
none
actually
worked
jericol
jericol
respondent
sigmon
coal
company
person
related
jericol
filed
suit
commissioner
district
granted
summary
judgment
concluding
act
classification
regime
provide
liability
successors
defunct
signatory
operators
affirming
fourth
circuit
concluded
act
clear
unambiguous
bound
read
exactly
written
held
inter
alia
jericol
related
person
shackleford
thus
held
responsible
shackleford
miners
held
coal
act
permit
commissioner
assign
retired
miners
successors
interest
signatory
operators
pp
act
explicit
may
assigned
liability
beneficiaries
neither
related
persons
provision
provision
successors
interest
signatory
operators
may
assigned
liability
act
plain
language
necessarily
precludes
commissioner
assigning
disputed
miners
jericol
statutory
language
unambiguous
inquiry
ceases
see
ron
pair
enterprises
since
retirees
issue
shackelford
employees
signatory
operator
sold
assets
jericol
commissioner
assign
beneficiaries
jericol
related
person
shackleford
section
person
shall
considered
related
person
signatory
operator
person
member
controlled
group
corporations
includes
signatory
operator
ii
trade
business
common
control
signatory
operator
iii
person
partnership
interest
joint
venture
signatory
operator
exceptions
related
person
also
includes
successor
interest
person
described
clause
ii
iii
contention
jericol
ever
member
controlled
group
corporations
including
shackleford
ever
business
common
control
shackleford
ever
partnership
interest
engaged
joint
venture
ford
therefore
liability
beneficiaries
may
attach
jericol
successor
interest
entity
described
iii
jericol
successor
interest
shackleford
jericol
liable
signatory
operator
shackleford
falls
within
one
categories
none
three
categories
however
includes
signatory
operator
inclusion
inferred
since
general
principle
statutory
construction
one
statutory
section
includes
particular
language
omitted
another
section
act
presumed
congress
acted
intentionally
purposely
russello
congress
wanted
provide
successor
liability
coal
act
explicitly
demonstrated
congress
meant
make
preenactment
successor
interest
like
jericol
liable
done
clearly
explicitly
pp
rejects
commissioner
arguments
light
coal
act
text
structure
purposes
direct
successor
interest
entity
signatory
operator
included
within
liability
scheme
responsible
operator
combined
fund
premiums
operator
defunct
related
person
still
business
pp
act
text
supports
neither
two
readings
proposed
commissioner
first
commissioner
argues
last
sentence
related
person
include
successor
interest
person
described
clause
ii
iii
clauses
mention
signatory
operator
operator
described
clause
virtue
express
reference
unlikely
congress
neither
created
separate
category
signatory
operators
included
signatory
operators
within
categories
intended
attach
liability
group
successors
interest
signatory
operators
general
clause
meant
reach
persons
described
one
three
explicit
categories
second
commissioner
argues
signatory
operator
necessarily
member
controlled
group
corporations
includes
successor
interest
member
group
includes
successor
interest
signatory
operator
section
however
divorced
clause
begins
related
persons
provision
person
shall
considered
related
person
signatory
operator
person
emphasis
added
makes
little
sense
signatory
operator
related
statute
necessarily
implies
related
person
separate
entity
signatory
operator
moreover
commissioner
argument
works
signatory
operator
actually
part
controlled
group
corporations
argument
force
event
commissioner
contend
shackleford
part
group
pp
floor
statements
two
senators
sponsored
coal
act
commissioner
alleges
support
position
amend
unambiguous
language
statute
reason
give
greater
weight
senator
floor
statement
collective
votes
houses
memorialized
unambiguous
statutory
text
pp
also
unavailing
commissioner
argument
construing
related
person
provision
exclude
signatory
direct
successor
interest
contrary
congress
stated
purposes
ensuring
combined
fund
beneficiary
health
care
costs
borne
possible
person
direct
responsibility
beneficiary
persons
connection
beneficiary
public
fisc
commissioner
appears
request
application
form
absurd
results
test
respondents
answer
correctly
rarely
invokes
test
override
unambiguous
legislation
offer
several
explanations
congress
purposefully
exempted
successors
interest
signatory
operator
related
person
definition
statutory
language
clear
unambiguous
need
neither
accept
reject
particular
plausible
explanation
congress
written
statute
negotiations
surrounding
bill
enactment
tell
typical
story
legislative
battle
among
interest
groups
congress
president
quite
possible
bill
assigned
liability
successors
signatory
operators
survived
legislative
process
deals
brokered
committee
floor
two
houses
joint
house
senate
conference
negotiations
president
whose
role
interpret
language
statute
enacted
congress
alter
unambiguous
text
order
satisfy
commissioner
policy
preferences
pp
finally
rejects
commissioner
suggestion
reasonable
conclude
direct
successors
signatory
operator
responsible
operator
employees
interpretation
entitled
deference
context
unambiguous
statute
need
contemplate
deferring
agency
interpretation
see
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
affirmed
thomas
delivered
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
kennedy
souter
ginsburg
joined
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
joined
jo
anne
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
petitioner
sigmon
coal
company
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
february
justice
thomas
delivered
opinion
case
arises
commissioner
social
security
assignment
pursuant
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
coal
act
act
et
seq
ed
supp
retired
coal
miners
jericol
mining
company
jericol
question
presented
whether
coal
act
permits
commissioner
assign
retired
miners
successors
interest
signatory
appeals
fourth
circuit
held
sigmon
coal
apfel
affirm
coal
act
reconfigured
system
providing
private
health
care
benefits
retirees
coal
industry
restructuring
system
congress
contend
half
century
agreements
coal
industry
mine
workers
america
umwa
coal
miners
union
tensions
coal
operators
umwa
often
led
lengthy
strikes
serious
economic
consequences
industry
employees
confronted
industry
fraught
contention
congress
faced
difficult
first
time
federal
government
called
intervene
negotiations
within
industry
tensions
motivated
president
truman
issue
executive
order
directing
secretary
interior
take
possession
bituminous
coal
mines
negotiate
umwa
changes
terms
conditions
miners
employment
see
eastern
enterprises
apfel
plurality
opinion
quoting
fed
reg
negotiations
culminated
first
many
agreements
resulted
creation
benefit
funds
compensating
miners
dependents
survivors
subsequently
umwa
several
coal
operators
entered
collectively
bargained
agreement
national
bituminous
coal
wage
agreement
nbcwa
established
fund
three
trustees
given
authority
determine
among
things
allocation
benefits
miners
families
disagreement
prompted
parties
negotiate
another
nbcwa
following
year
bituminous
coal
operators
association
bcoa
created
multiemployer
bargaining
association
primary
representative
coal
operators
negotiations
umwa
nbcwa
amended
occasionally
new
nbcwas
adopted
terms
structure
agreement
remained
largely
unchanged
ibid
order
comply
employee
retirement
income
security
act
erisa
et
seq
ed
supp
umwa
bcoa
negotiated
new
agreement
finance
benefits
nbcwa
created
four
trusts
replaced
benefit
plans
quickly
developed
financial
problems
thus
parties
executed
another
nbcwa
agreement
assigned
responsibility
health
care
active
retired
employees
respective
coal
mine
operators
signatories
earlier
nbcwas
left
benefit
plan
effect
retirees
whose
former
employers
longer
business
nonetheless
financial
problems
continued
plague
plans
costs
increased
employers
signed
nbcwa
withdrew
agreement
either
continue
business
nonunion
employees
exit
coal
business
altogether
coal
operators
abandoned
benefit
plans
remaining
signatories
forced
absorb
increasing
cost
covering
retirees
left
behind
exiting
employers
ibid
pursuant
yet
another
nbcwa
umwa
bcoa
attempted
remedy
problem
time
imposing
withdrawal
liability
nbcwa
signatories
seceded
benefit
plans
despite
efforts
plans
remained
serious
financial
crisis
june
individuals
received
health
benefits
funds
danger
losing
benefits
frieden
congress
ponders
fate
coal
miners
fund
business
health
hereinafter
frieden
individuals
retired
miners
dependents
whose
former
employers
longer
contributing
benefit
plans
another
worked
employers
longer
never
karr
union
nonunion
coal
companies
head
showdown
retirement
benefits
wall
street
journal
mar
hereinafter
karr
troubles
aggravated
rising
health
care
costs
frieden
umwa
threatened
strike
legislative
solution
reached
karr
bcoa
members
included
coal
firms
currently
signatories
nbcwas
threatened
renew
commitments
cover
retiree
costs
contracts
expired
ibid
following
another
strike
much
unrest
secretary
labor
elizabeth
dole
created
advisory
commission
mine
workers
america
retiree
health
benefits
coal
commission
studied
problem
proposed
several
solutions
eastern
enterprises
particular
coal
commission
focused
finance
health
care
benefits
orphaned
retirees
congress
considered
proposals
eventually
reconfigured
allocation
health
benefits
coal
miner
retirees
enacting
coal
act
crafting
legislative
solution
crisis
however
easy
task
coal
act
passed
amidst
maelstrom
contract
negotiations
strike
threats
presidential
veto
first
version
threats
second
veto
high
pressure
mention
wide
disagreements
among
members
congress
act
merged
benefit
plans
new
multiemployer
plan
called
mine
workers
america
combined
benefit
fund
combined
fund
see
combined
fund
financed
annual
premiums
assessed
signatory
coal
operators
coal
operators
signed
nbcwa
agreement
requiring
contributions
benefits
plans
eastern
enterprises
signatory
longer
business
statute
assigns
liability
defined
group
related
persons
ibid
see
coal
act
charged
commissioner
social
security
assigning
eligible
beneficiary
signatory
operator
related
persons
statute
identifies
specific
categories
signatory
operators
related
persons
requires
commissioner
assign
beneficiaries
among
categories
particular
order
ibid
coal
act
also
ensures
beneficiary
remains
unassigned
existing
company
falls
within
aforementioned
categories
benefits
financed
combined
fund
either
funds
transferred
interest
earned
department
interior
abandoned
mine
reclamation
fund
additional
premium
imposed
assigned
signatory
operators
pro
rata
basis
see
ii
respondent
jericol
formed
irdell
mining
irdell
shortly
thereafter
irdell
another
company
purchased
coal
mining
operating
assets
shackleford
coal
company
company
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
business
sigmon
coal
apfel
supp
wd
acquired
right
use
shackleford
name
assumed
responsibility
shackleford
outstanding
contracts
including
agreement
umwa
app
common
ownership
irdell
shackleford
irdell
subsequently
changed
name
operating
shackleford
coal
company
changed
name
jericol
new
company
signatory
nbcwa
acting
pursuant
commissioner
assigned
premium
responsibility
retired
miners
dependents
jericol
assigned
worked
shackleford
commissioner
determined
successor
successor
interest
original
shackleford
jericol
qualified
related
person
shackleford
others
assigned
actually
worked
jericol
jericol
appealed
commissioner
arguing
assignments
erroneous
jericol
successor
interest
shackleford
jericol
related
person
see
pet
cert
dissatisfied
outcome
administrative
proceedings
sigmon
coal
company
jericol
filed
suit
commissioner
arguing
wrongfully
assigned
retirees
dependents
jericol
supp
district
concluded
classification
regime
coal
act
provide
directly
indirectly
liability
laid
door
successors
defunct
signatory
operators
district
ordered
commissioner
withdraw
challenged
assignments
enjoined
commissioner
assigning
additional
retirees
jericol
basis
related
person
original
shackleford
commissioner
appealed
arguing
straight
reading
statute
shows
successor
interest
signatory
operator
qualifies
related
person
thereby
permitting
assignment
retirees
dependents
jericol
alternatively
commissioner
argued
district
reading
produces
inexplicable
anomalous
results
clearly
odds
congressional
intent
ibid
eclin
ing
commissioner
invitation
rewrite
coal
act
appeals
fourth
circuit
affirmed
appeals
concluded
statute
clear
unambiguous
bound
read
exactly
written
ibid
accordingly
held
jericol
related
person
shackleford
thus
held
responsible
shackleford
miners
appeals
rejected
commissioner
arguments
reading
either
contravenes
congressional
intent
begets
fairly
odd
results
rather
appeals
found
plausible
jericol
explanation
plain
text
act
consistent
congress
desire
promote
sale
coal
companies
respond
complaints
coal
operators
required
pay
benefits
retired
miners
neither
worked
maintained
relationship
plausible
explanation
concluded
need
reject
assertion
coal
act
definition
related
person
face
absurd
alternatively
reasoned
even
literal
text
statute
produced
arguably
anomalous
result
simply
free
ignore
unambiguous
language
imagine
preferable
version
ibid
one
rare
cases
concluded
congress
drafted
statute
produced
absurdity
gross
shock
general
moral
common
sense
ibid
quoting
maryland
dept
ed
department
veterans
affairs
granted
certiorari
affirm
iii
statutory
construction
cases
begin
language
statute
first
step
determine
whether
language
issue
plain
unambiguous
meaning
regard
particular
dispute
case
robinson
shell
oil
citing
ron
pair
enterprises
inquiry
ceases
statutory
language
unambiguous
statutory
scheme
coherent
consistent
respect
question
presented
case
statute
unambiguous
statutory
text
instructs
coal
act
permit
commissioner
assign
beneficiaries
successor
interest
signatory
operator
statute
provides
purposes
chapter
commissioner
social
security
shall
october
assign
coal
industry
retiree
eligible
beneficiary
signatory
operator
related
person
respect
remains
business
following
order
first
signatory
operator
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
subsequent
coal
wage
agreement
recent
signatory
operator
employ
coal
industry
retiree
coal
industry
least
years
second
retiree
assigned
paragraph
signatory
operator
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
subsequent
coal
wage
agreement
recent
signatory
operator
employ
coal
industry
retiree
coal
industry
third
retiree
assigned
paragraph
signatory
operator
employed
coal
industry
retiree
coal
industry
longer
period
time
signatory
operator
prior
effective
date
coal
wage
agreement
case
commissioner
determined
shackleford
signatory
employed
disputed
miners
months
assignment
must
made
category
assigned
miners
jericol
determining
jericol
successor
interest
shackleford
therefore
related
person
shackleford
disagree
commissioner
reasoning
disputed
retirees
employees
shackleford
signatory
operator
sold
assets
jericol
commissioner
assign
jericol
related
person
shackleford
statute
provides
person
shall
considered
related
person
signatory
operator
person
falls
within
one
three
categories
member
controlled
group
corporations
within
meaning
section
includes
signatory
operator
ii
trade
business
common
control
determined
section
signatory
operator
iii
person
identified
partnership
interest
joint
venture
signatory
operator
business
within
coal
industry
business
employed
eligible
beneficiaries
except
clause
shall
apply
person
whose
interest
limited
partner
addition
last
sentence
related
person
shall
also
include
successor
interest
person
described
clause
ii
iii
although
commissioner
maintains
jericol
related
person
shackleford
jericol
fall
within
three
specified
categories
defining
related
person
contention
ever
member
controlled
group
corporations
including
shackleford
ever
business
common
control
shackleford
ever
partnership
interest
engaged
joint
venture
shackleford
therefore
liability
beneficiaries
may
attach
jericol
successor
interest
entity
described
iii
jericol
successor
interest
shackleford
jericol
liable
signatory
operator
shackleford
falls
within
one
categories
none
three
categories
however
includes
signatory
operator
infer
much
general
principle
statutory
construction
congress
includes
particular
language
one
section
statute
omits
another
section
act
generally
presumed
congress
acts
intentionally
purposely
disparate
inclusion
exclusion
russello
quoting
wong
kim
bo
congress
wanted
provide
successor
liability
coal
act
explicitly
demonstrated
sections
act
give
option
attaching
liability
successors
successors
interest
example
provides
respect
beneficiaries
combined
fund
person
becomes
successor
assigned
operator
enactment
date
coal
act
assigned
operator
may
transfer
assignment
eligible
beneficiary
successor
successor
shall
treated
assigned
operator
respect
eligible
beneficiary
purposes
chapter
emphasis
added
subsection
also
provides
however
assigned
operator
transferring
assignment
related
person
shall
remain
guarantor
benefits
provided
eligible
beneficiary
chapter
ibid
provision
gives
postenactment
successor
option
transferring
assignment
assuming
signatory
operator
liability
address
liability
preenactment
successors
enumerates
continuing
obligations
individual
employer
plans
ieps
maintained
pursuant
subsequent
coal
wage
section
provides
purposes
ieps
umwa
benefit
plan
term
last
signatory
operator
shall
include
successor
interest
operator
thus
congress
gave
last
signatory
operator
definition
extends
iep
obligations
preenactment
signatory
operator
include
successors
interest
subsections
stand
direct
contrast
provisions
implicated
define
signatory
operator
related
persons
last
signatory
operator
respectively
purposes
section
specify
include
impose
liability
signatory
operator
successor
interest
despite
unambiguous
language
statute
respect
entities
successor
liability
attaches
commissioner
essentially
asks
read
statute
mandatory
liability
preenactment
successors
interest
signatory
operators
refrain
concluding
differing
language
two
subsections
meaning
presume
ascribe
difference
simple
mistake
draftsmanship
russello
supra
congress
wrote
statute
manner
provides
liability
successors
interest
certain
signatory
operators
congress
meant
make
preenactment
successor
interest
like
jericol
liable
done
clearly
explicitly
therefore
statute
explicit
may
assigned
liability
beneficiaries
neither
related
persons
provision
provision
successors
interest
signatory
operators
may
assigned
liability
plain
language
statute
necessarily
precludes
commissioner
assigning
disputed
miners
jericol
iv
commissioner
admits
statute
state
haec
verba
assignment
may
made
direct
successor
interest
entity
signatory
operator
brief
petitioner
nonetheless
commissioner
concludes
light
text
structure
purposes
coal
act
direct
successors
interest
included
within
liability
scheme
responsible
signatory
operator
combined
fund
premiums
signatory
operator
defunct
related
person
still
business
ibid
address
commissioner
arguments
commissioner
proposes
several
readings
statute
first
commissioner
argues
last
sentence
term
related
person
include
successor
interest
person
described
clause
ii
iii
clauses
mention
signatory
operator
signatory
operator
described
clause
virtue
express
reference
brief
petitioner
text
statute
support
reading
congress
wanted
include
successors
interest
clearly
explicitly
see
supra
category
related
persons
describes
definitive
group
persons
congress
neither
created
separate
category
signatory
operators
included
signatory
operators
within
categories
unlikely
congress
intended
attach
liability
group
successors
interest
signatory
operators
general
clause
meant
reach
persons
described
one
three
explicit
categories
second
commissioner
argues
signatory
operator
necessarily
member
controlled
group
corporations
includes
brief
petitioner
subsection
provides
related
persons
include
member
controlled
group
corporations
within
meaning
section
includes
signatory
operator
thus
according
commissioner
logic
corporation
member
controlled
group
includes
corporations
successor
interest
member
group
corporations
includes
successor
interest
corporation
ibid
standing
alone
subsection
supports
commissioner
argument
signatory
operator
necessarily
member
group
corporations
includes
provision
divorced
clause
begins
related
persons
provision
person
shall
considered
related
person
signatory
operator
person
emphasis
added
commissioner
reading
signatory
operator
related
makes
little
sense
say
related
person
makes
little
sense
say
signatory
operator
related
person
statute
therefore
necessarily
implies
related
person
separate
entity
signatory
operator
moreover
commissioner
argument
works
signatory
operator
actually
part
controlled
group
corporations
commissioner
account
situation
signatory
operator
part
controlled
group
commissioner
contend
shackleford
part
controlled
group
corporations
argument
event
force
commissioner
also
contends
background
legislative
history
purposes
coal
act
confirm
congress
intended
liability
signatory
operator
employees
placed
signatory
direct
successor
interest
support
commissioner
turns
floor
statements
senators
malcolm
wallop
jay
rockefeller
arguing
senators
sponsored
coal
act
views
entitled
special
weight
particular
commissioner
relies
explanation
legislation
placed
record
senator
wallop
making
point
addition
three
categories
related
persons
statute
provides
related
persons
includes
iv
specific
instances
successors
collective
bargaining
agreement
obligations
signatory
operator
cong
rec
commissioner
also
points
senator
rockefeller
statement
term
signatory
operator
defined
new
section
includes
successor
interest
operator
floor
statements
two
senators
amend
clear
unambiguous
language
statute
see
reason
give
greater
weight
views
two
senators
collective
votes
houses
memorialized
unambiguous
statutory
commissioner
also
argues
construing
related
person
provision
exclude
signatory
direct
successor
interest
contrary
congress
stated
purpose
ensuring
combined
fund
beneficiary
health
care
costs
borne
possible
person
direct
responsibility
beneficiary
persons
connection
beneficiary
public
fisc
commissioner
contends
choose
construction
statute
effectuates
congress
overriding
purpose
avoiding
recurrence
orphan
retiree
catastrophe
caused
large
part
operators
avoiding
responsibility
beneficiaries
changing
corporate
structures
selling
assets
ceasing
operations
see
brief
petitioner
commissioner
suggests
appeals
construction
statute
leads
result
direct
successor
interest
signatory
may
made
responsible
signatory
beneficiaries
even
though
successor
liability
supported
background
principles
distantly
related
successor
interest
corporate
affiliate
signatory
operator
may
made
responsible
signatory
beneficiaries
thus
commissioner
appears
request
invoke
form
absurd
results
test
citing
video
brown
respondents
correctly
note
rarely
invokes
test
override
unambiguous
legislation
moreover
respondents
offer
several
explanations
congress
purposefully
exempted
successors
interest
signatory
operator
related
person
definition
first
respondents
argue
coal
operators
undoubtedly
opposed
legislation
seriously
expanded
liability
respect
miners
never
hard
imagine
signatory
companies
agreed
compromise
exposed
statutory
liability
linked
decades
buying
selling
trading
property
brief
respondents
second
respondents
speculate
congress
may
concluded
injecting
coal
industry
successor
issues
commissioner
task
allocating
liability
umwa
retirees
dependents
consume
disproportionate
share
agency
resources
create
gridlock
assignment
process
precipitate
endless
operator
challenges
coal
act
administrative
review
process
thwart
implementation
program
finally
respondents
suggest
congress
concerned
adverse
impact
successor
liability
might
valuation
sale
union
companies
statutory
language
clear
biguous
need
neither
accept
reject
ular
plausible
explanation
congress
written
statute
imposes
liability
successors
companies
fall
within
categories
iii
successors
signatory
operators
dissatisfied
text
statute
commissioner
attempts
search
apply
overarching
legislative
purpose
section
statute
dissatisfaction
however
often
cost
legislative
compromise
negotiations
surrounding
enactment
bill
tell
typical
story
legislative
battle
among
interest
groups
congress
president
see
supra
nn
indeed
legislation
failed
ease
tensions
among
many
interested
delicate
crafting
reflected
compromise
amidst
highly
interested
parties
attempting
pull
provisions
different
directions
see
legislative
history
change
individual
provision
unraveled
whole
quite
possible
bill
assigned
liability
successors
signatory
operators
survived
legislative
process
deals
brokered
committee
markup
floor
two
houses
joint
house
senate
conference
negotiations
president
us
judge
role
interpret
language
statute
enacted
congress
statute
contain
conflicting
provisions
ambiguous
language
require
narrowing
construction
application
canon
interpretative
tool
stated
time
courts
must
presume
legislature
says
statute
means
means
statute
says
words
statute
unambiguous
first
canon
also
last
judicial
inquiry
complete
connecticut
nat
bank
germain
quoting
rubin
internal
citations
omitted
alter
text
order
satisfy
policy
preferences
commissioner
battles
fought
among
political
branches
industry
parties
seek
amend
statute
appeal
judicial
branch
commissioner
final
argument
even
coal
act
affirmatively
provide
responsibility
combined
fund
premiums
may
imposed
signatory
direct
successor
reasonable
commissioner
conclude
direct
successors
signatory
operator
responsible
operator
employees
congress
however
delegate
authority
commissioner
develop
new
guidelines
assign
liability
manner
inconsistent
statute
context
unambiguous
statute
need
contemplate
deferring
agency
interpretation
see
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
accordingly
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
jo
anne
barnhart
commissioner
social
security
petitioner
sigmon
coal
company
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
february
justice
stevens
justice
justice
breyer
join
dissenting
case
raises
question
whether
clear
evidence
coherent
congressional
intent
inform
construction
statutory
provision
seems
first
blush
convey
incoherent
message
today
majority
chooses
disregard
evidence
instead
adheres
interpretation
statute
produces
absurd
results
two
members
congress
sponsors
legislation
issue
explained
statute
mandate
results
agency
charged
administering
statute
agrees
partner
two
branches
government
heed
reasonable
interpretation
congress
objectives
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
coal
act
act
et
seq
ed
supp
authorizes
commissioner
social
security
commissioner
assign
responsibility
providing
health
care
benefits
certain
retired
coal
miners
beneficiaries
enacted
response
financial
difficulties
plagued
national
bituminous
coal
wage
agreements
nbcwas
private
health
care
system
established
representatives
coal
industry
mine
workers
association
umwa
see
eastern
enterprises
apfel
nbcwas
part
arrangement
umwa
accepted
bargaining
agreements
dictating
wages
benefits
terms
employment
exchange
inter
alia
promises
regarding
provision
lifetime
health
benefits
retired
miners
many
coal
operators
signatories
nbcwas
went
business
withdrew
coverage
remaining
signatories
forced
assume
share
health
care
costs
operators
employees
consequently
remaining
members
even
greater
incentive
avoid
obligations
agreements
ibid
ensuing
downward
spiral
threatened
nbcwas
ability
provide
health
benefits
evaluating
legislative
solutions
congress
advised
retirees
might
receive
benefits
promised
process
quoting
coal
commission
report
health
benefits
retired
coal
miners
hearing
subcommittee
medicare
care
senate
committee
finance
statement
bituminous
coal
operator
association
chairman
michael
reilly
congress
objective
passing
coal
act
identify
persons
responsible
plan
liabilities
establish
order
priority
ensure
viability
fund
energy
policy
act
pub
stat
accomplish
goal
act
directs
commissioner
assign
primary
responsibility
signatory
operator
formerly
employed
particular
miners
persons
related
operator
broad
definition
term
related
person
includes
three
classes
entities
associated
signatory
catchall
sentence
stating
related
person
shall
also
include
successor
interest
person
described
clause
ii
iii
question
case
whether
act
permits
commissioner
assign
retirees
successor
signatory
successors
related
persons
signatory
commissioner
reads
statute
broadly
include
direct
successors
whereas
adopted
narrower
reading
excludes
responsibility
signatory
operator
described
clause
ii
iii
concludes
successor
interest
signatory
liable
retirees
predecessor
catchall
provision
thus
reads
act
assign
liability
first
signatory
operator
assuming
still
business
related
persons
signatory
none
exists
still
business
successor
interest
related
person
liability
never
assigned
direct
successor
logical
recipient
liability
signatory
two
examples
illustrate
absurdity
reading
first
imagine
corporations
operate
coal
mines
kentucky
illinois
respectively
affiliated
corporations
let
us
say
members
controlled
group
corporations
company
became
signatory
one
coal
agreements
subsequently
sell
assets
separate
purchasers
reading
act
purchaser
kentucky
mines
responsible
health
care
costs
illinois
miners
purchaser
illinois
mines
assigned
retirees
kentucky
company
neither
purchaser
liable
predecessor
retired
employees
consider
slightly
different
scenario
still
operates
coal
mine
runs
dairy
farm
still
members
controlled
group
corporations
however
signatory
agreement
hypothetical
sell
assets
reading
statute
purchaser
dairy
farm
liable
retired
miners
benefits
purchaser
coal
mine
liability
result
absurd
surely
incoherent
congress
order
odd
result
answer
simple
congress
intend
result
commenting
final
text
bill
ultimately
enacted
two
senators
sponsoring
measure
explained
understanding
statutory
text
colleagues
senator
rockefeller
west
virginia
spoke
original
author
legislation
cong
rec
unambiguously
stated
term
signatory
operator
includes
successor
interest
operator
written
explanation
measure
placed
congressional
record
senator
wallop
stated
definition
term
related
person
intentionally
broad
encompassed
successors
collective
bargaining
agreement
obligations
signatory
operator
assume
senators
rockefeller
wallop
correctly
understood
work
product
provision
coherent
obviously
sensible
impose
cost
health
care
benefits
successors
signatory
operators
equally
obvious
far
less
justification
imposing
liability
successors
related
companies
engaged
coal
mining
moreover
assigning
liability
direct
successors
consistent
congress
explicit
objective
identify
persons
responsible
plan
liabilities
stat
two
successor
signatory
notice
may
held
responsible
predecessor
liabilities
successor
related
person
signatory
fact
successors
signatories
nbcwa
specifically
notice
provision
agreement
employer
promise
operations
covered
agreement
shall
sold
conveyed
otherwise
transferred
assigned
successor
without
first
securing
agreement
successor
assume
employer
obligations
agreement
article
national
bituminous
coal
wage
agreement
direct
successor
put
notice
presumably
received
lower
sale
price
exchange
assuming
agreement
obligations
predecessor
consider
facts
case
respondent
jericol
mining
purchased
coal
mining
assets
shackleford
signatory
nbcwa
sales
contract
provided
jericol
assume
responsibility
shackleford
outstanding
contracts
including
agreement
app
price
jericol
paid
shackleford
assets
therefore
must
reflected
fact
jericol
taking
shackleford
commitments
retirees
allowing
jericol
escape
responsibility
end
bargain
stage
effectively
grants
windfall
trumpets
clear
language
statute
language
clear
enough
require
disregard
clearly
expressed
legislative
intention
contrary
consumer
product
safety
gte
sylvania
require
us
accept
absurd
results
turkette
citing
trans
alaska
pipeline
rate
cases
see
infra
nevertheless
accepts
respondents
claim
even
statute
produces
odd
results
scheme
product
legislative
compromise
override
drafters
according
theory
may
confronted
significant
opposition
successors
signatories
faced
liability
alternative
language
congress
may
concerned
imposing
liability
successors
create
disincentive
potential
purchasers
coal
companies
assets
negotiations
contentious
respondents
imagine
act
excluded
direct
successors
product
horsetrading
one
expect
response
statements
two
senators
directly
contradicting
terms
legislative
bargain
surely
senators
disagreed
senators
rockefeller
wallop
said
something
set
record
straight
contrary
evidence
legislative
history
compromise
respondents
amici
cite
evidence
supporting
version
events
respondents
counsel
asked
specifically
oral
argument
tr
oral
arg
total
absence
suggestion
legislative
history
senators
misdescribed
coverage
act
significant
see
harrison
ppg
industries
rehnquist
dissenting
case
construction
legislative
language
makes
sweeping
relatively
unorthodox
change
think
judges
well
detectives
may
take
consideration
fact
watchdog
bark
night
green
bock
laundry
machine
scalia
concurring
judgment
confronted
statutory
language
produces
absurd
result
appropriate
observe
counsel
provided
discovered
shred
evidence
anyone
ever
proposed
assumed
bizarre
disposition
absent
response
indicating
senators
mischaracterized
act
construe
statute
light
clear
purpose
thereby
avoid
absurd
results
majority
countenances
indeed
cavalier
treatment
explanations
statute
provided
colleagues
senators
rockefeller
wallop
disrespectful
senators
entire
senate
well
although
say
explicitly
apparently
assumes
senators
either
dissembling
unable
understand
meaning
bill
sponsoring
neither
assumption
tenable
much
likely
simple
explanation
senators
quite
reasonably
thought
term
signatory
operator
included
successors
account
certainly
consistent
congress
instructions
dictionary
act
reference
corporation
may
embrace
successors
assigns
even
expressly
mentioned
coal
act
defines
signatory
operator
person
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
term
person
defined
according
dictionary
act
includes
corporations
companies
associations
firms
partnerships
societies
joint
stock
companies
well
individuals
know
word
company
association
used
reference
corporation
shall
deemed
embrace
words
successors
assigns
company
association
like
manner
words
words
similar
import
expressed
therefore
reading
term
signatory
operator
encompass
direct
successors
compatible
default
rules
congress
provided
interpreting
statutes
context
indicate
otherwise
congress
clearly
authorized
commissioner
assign
retirees
successors
extending
liability
category
successors
consistent
purpose
act
cf
rowland
california
men
colony
unit
ii
men
advisory
council
recognizing
even
contextual
features
contradict
dictionary
act
reading
interpretation
may
appropriate
make
little
sense
adopt
literal
reading
wilson
omaha
tribe
trucking
three
additional
considerations
support
reading
act
cover
direct
successors
first
reading
consistently
endorsed
several
commissioners
responsible
administration
act
notwithstanding
change
control
executive
previously
attached
significance
fact
new
administration
took
office
agency
concluded
statutory
term
given
definition
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
second
consistent
treatment
successorship
issues
labor
cases
required
successors
bargain
union
certified
predecessor
see
fall
river
dyeing
finishing
nlrb
assume
liability
reinstatement
backpay
result
predecessor
unfair
labor
practice
see
golden
state
bottling
nlrb
arbitrate
disputes
provided
predecessor
agreement
see
john
wiley
sons
livingston
finally
avoid
adopting
interpretation
statute
recreates
difficulties
beset
nbcwas
congress
explicitly
sought
avoid
immediate
consequence
reading
retired
miners
unassigned
therefore
health
care
expenses
borne
remaining
signatory
operators
related
persons
assuming
retired
miners
category
today
decision
result
orphaned
miners
draw
combined
fund
extent
cost
health
benefits
passed
along
signatory
operators
holding
creates
added
incentive
remaining
signatories
avoid
obligations
agreements
result
effectively
downward
spiral
doomed
eastern
judgment
holding
case
product
misguided
approach
issues
statutory
construction
text
statute
provides
us
evidence
usually
sufficient
disclose
intent
enacting
congress
always
case
occasions
exclusive
focus
text
seems
convey
incoherent
message
reliable
evidence
clarifies
statute
avoids
apparent
incoherence
case
one
never
permit
narrow
focus
text
obscure
commonsense
appraisal
additional
evidence
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
signatory
operator
coal
operato
signed
national
bituminous
coal
wage
agreement
agreement
requiring
contributions
benefit
plans
eastern
enterprises
apfel
see
also
ed
term
signatory
operator
means
person
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
eastern
enterprises
discussed
great
length
history
negotiations
coal
industry
umwa
provision
employee
benefits
coal
miners
provide
brief
summary
trusts
included
umwa
benefit
plan
trust
benefit
plan
provided
nonpension
benefits
including
medical
benefits
miners
retired
january
umwa
benefit
plan
trust
benefit
plan
provided
benefits
active
miners
retired
term
orphan
retirees
encompassed
true
orphans
whose
former
employers
longer
business
reachback
orphans
whose
former
employers
still
business
longer
signatories
coal
wage
agreement
possibly
longer
coal
business
house
committee
ways
means
development
implementation
coal
industry
retiree
health
benefit
act
comm
print
hereinafter
development
see
mcglothlin
connors
wd
lawsuit
involved
beneficiaries
benefit
plan
benefit
plan
trustees
bcoa
district
judge
encouraged
zealously
seek
passage
bill
congress
permit
transfer
funds
possession
trustees
excess
future
projected
needs
finance
benefit
trusts
original
proposal
introduced
senator
jay
rockefeller
benefits
financed
taxes
entire
coal
industry
premiums
collected
reachback
companies
considered
responsible
specific
orphans
development
support
umwa
bcoa
private
benefits
alliance
pba
group
nonunion
companies
congress
originally
passed
bill
part
comprehensive
tax
package
see
karr
president
bush
however
vetoed
entire
package
part
coal
tax
provisions
tax
package
veto
kills
bailout
plan
rockefeller
vows
find
another
way
mine
regulation
reporter
mar
wl
members
congress
continued
push
legislation
using
comprehensive
energy
bill
vehicle
senator
rockefeller
attempted
add
coal
tax
provision
energy
bill
measure
strongly
opposed
number
senators
bush
administration
cloture
motion
energy
bill
fails
dole
says
resolution
dispute
controversial
coal
tax
may
near
bush
threatens
veto
remains
foster
natural
gas
report
july
much
negotiation
final
version
bill
include
tax
provision
provided
companies
party
nbcwas
required
cover
retiree
health
costs
senate
adopts
compromise
amendment
funding
miner
health
benefits
bna
daily
labor
report
july
umwa
bcoa
example
joined
forces
support
legislation
require
nonunion
companies
share
cost
providing
health
benefits
thereby
shifting
burden
paying
funds
entire
industry
contrast
pba
alliance
nonunion
companies
insisted
never
employed
retirees
forced
pick
companies
obligations
karr
term
beneficiary
refers
individual
coal
industry
retiree
july
eligible
receive
receiving
benefits
umwa
benefit
plan
umwa
benefit
plan
date
eligible
receive
receiving
benefits
either
plan
reason
relationship
retiree
jericol
appeal
recent
assignment
commissioner
arguing
already
filed
suit
required
exhaust
administrative
remedies
seeking
relief
given
similarity
law
facts
underlying
assignment
shackleford
miners
jericol
district
agreed
sigmon
coal
apfel
supp
wd
case
reviewing
whether
jericol
related
person
shackleford
sigmon
coal
joined
jericol
plaintiff
apparently
related
persons
coal
act
ed
thus
jointly
severally
responsible
amounts
due
either
see
supp
rules
applicable
successors
signatory
operators
maintain
plans
provided
discusses
obligations
person
becomes
successor
last
signatory
operator
postenactment
nearly
identical
placed
proper
context
statement
entirely
consistent
statutory
text
senator
wallop
noted
first
bill
makes
related
person
fully
responsible
signatory
operator
obligation
provide
benefits
act
signatory
longer
business
otherwise
fail
fulfill
obligations
act
cong
emphasis
added
listing
three
categories
related
persons
senator
wallop
added
category
iv
specific
instances
successors
collective
bargaining
agreement
obligations
signatory
operator
equally
obligated
signatory
operator
pay
continuing
health
care
coverage
ibid
emphasis
added
begin
must
noted
senator
wallop
state
successors
responsible
beneficiaries
rather
narrowed
group
qualifying
phrase
specific
instances
senator
wallop
suggest
responsibility
attaches
successors
interest
signatory
operators
instead
successors
collective
bargaining
agreement
obligations
nothing
entities
previously
identifies
fully
responsible
signatory
operator
obligation
related
persons
categorized
clauses
iii
consequently
statement
consistent
final
sentence
related
persons
definition
provides
related
person
shall
also
include
successor
interest
person
described
clause
ii
iii
need
look
statutory
text
know
definition
fact
include
successor
interest
see
term
signatory
operator
means
person
signatory
coal
wage
agreement
see
supra
despite
dissent
assertion
defer
characterizes
clear
evidence
coherent
congressional
intent
post
opinion
stevens
dissent
points
two
sentences
congressional
record
even
believe
floor
statements
amend
clear
statutory
language
statements
hardly
characterized
clear
evidence
begin
dissent
mischaracterizes
senator
wallop
statement
neglecting
explain
context
include
qualifying
phrase
specific
instances
see
supra
absent
support
senator
wallop
statement
dissent
left
senator
rockefeller
explanation
dissent
essentially
contends
use
single
sentence
long
colloquy
affect
major
change
statute
however
dissent
fails
note
house
passed
bill
october
three
days
senator
rockefeller
made
statement
see
legislative
history
energy
policy
act
committee
print
compiled
senate
committee
energy
natural
resources
library
congress
hereinafter
legislative
history
indication
senator
rockefeller
version
provision
garnered
support
house
senate
president
given
house
already
passed
bill
dissent
additional
reliance
absence
response
senators
explanation
simply
makes
sense
see
post
moreover
adopt
form
statutory
interpretation
placing
obligation
members
congress
monitor
colleague
floor
statements
read
every
word
congressional
record
including
written
explanations
inserted
record
evidence
need
rely
clear
statutory
text
commissioner
asks
apply
background
principles
successorship
articulated
treatment
labor
employment
benefit
statutes
corporate
entity
liability
statutory
scheme
attributed
entity
direct
successor
interest
brief
petitioner
coal
act
congress
expressly
delineated
parties
sought
attach
responsibility
statute
provides
explicit
scheme
include
successors
interest
signatory
operators
indication
congress
intended
statute
supplemented
reference
background
principles
import
principles
analysis
dissent
makes
conclusory
assertion
interpretation
statute
recreates
difficulties
beset
nbcwas
congress
explicitly
sought
avoid
see
post
dissent
however
provides
data
conclusory
assertion
explain
interpretation
recreates
ties
beset
nbcwas
ibid
dissent
ignores
fact
new
scheme
broadly
expanded
group
persons
responsible
beneficiaries
thus
fact
congress
declined
attach
liability
one
group
persons
tells
us
nothing
new
system
viability
respondents
argue
successor
liability
covering
years
transactions
exploded
number
combined
fund
beneficiaries
potentially
assignable
signatory
operators
see
brief
respondents
difficult
signatories
estimate
potential
liability
legislative
fix
included
successor
liability
thousands
umwa
retirees
potential
candidates
assignment
nbcwa
signatory
broad
based
successor
liability
congress
retroactively
burdened
coal
asset
purchasers
financial
shortfalls
arising
failures
private
party
contract
respondents
argue
future
purchasers
wary
paying
fair
market
value
coal
property
concerns
might
destabilize
unionized
industry
economic
underpinning
time
many
assigned
operators
might
need
raise
money
help
defray
costs
imposed
act
umwa
lobbying
efforts
precipitated
lawsuit
pittson
coal
company
sued
umwa
million
alleging
conclusion
strike
union
promised
lobby
behalf
legislation
making
reachback
companies
resume
payments
retiree
health
system
umw
denies
breaching
pittston
pact
coal
outlook
wl
pittston
accused
union
violating
promise
lobby
industry
wide
taxation
bail
two
retiree
health
funds
umw
pittston
reach
tentative
deal
coal
outlook
june
wl
footnotes
ed
provides
person
shall
considered
related
person
signatory
operator
person
member
controlled
group
corporations
within
meaning
includes
signatory
operator
ii
trade
business
common
control
determined
signatory
operator
iii
person
identified
partnership
interest
joint
venture
signatory
operator
business
within
coal
industry
business
employed
eligible
beneficiaries
except
clause
shall
apply
person
whose
interest
limited
partner
related
person
shall
also
include
successor
interest
person
described
clause
ii
iii
particular
interest
limit
scope
potential
assignees
three
subparagraphs
stated
ecause
complex
corporate
structures
often
found
coal
industry
number
entities
made
jointly
severally
liable
signatory
operator
obligations
definition
related
persons
intentionally
broad
regard
term
related
person
defined
broadly
include
companies
related
signatory
operator
conference
agreement
makes
related
person
fully
responsible
signatory
operator
obligation
provide
benefits
act
signatory
longer
business
otherwise
fail
fulfill
obligations
act
thus
statute
provides
related
persons
meaning
within
controlled
group
corporations
including
signatory
operator
using
common
ownership
test
ii
trade
business
common
control
signatory
operator
iii
one
partnership
interest
joint
venture
signatory
operator
iv
specific
instances
successors
collective
bargaining
agreement
obligations
signatory
operator
equally
obligated
signatory
operator
pay
continuing
health
care
coverage
cong
rec
emphasis
added
meaning
senator
wallop
reference
specific
instances
evident
surely
mean
instances
seems
assume
see
ante
phrase
successors
collective
bargaining
agreement
obligations
signatory
operator
refer
successors
persons
described
clauses
iii
members
controlled
group
corporations
example
assume
agreement
obligations
specific
instances
however
direct
successors
signatory
operators
may
assume
obligations
see
infra
senator
wallop
emphasized
point
clarifying
liability
intentionally
broad
cong
explained
purpose
provision
insure
every
reasonable
effort
made
locate
responsible
party
provide
benefits
cost
passed
signatory
companies
never
connection
individual
allocation
beneficiaries
entity
business
continues
business
basic
statutory
intent
thus
conference
agreement
overriding
purpose
find
designate
specific
obligor
many
beneficiaries
plans
possible
ibid
although
social
security
administration
interpreted
meaning
successor
differently
time
taking
different
positions
whether
asset
purchaser
qualifies
successor
consistently
taken
position
direct
successor
assigned
responsibility
signatory
employees
see
provisions
relating
health
benefits
retired
coal
miners
hearing
house
committee
ways
means
statement
commissioner
lawrence
thompson
explaining
miners
assigned
last
active
signatory
operator
successor
operator
business
miner
worked
letter
ssa
southeastern
program
service
center
app
uccessors
successors
interest
treated
assignment
purposes
change
ownership
supplemental
coal
act
review
instructions
july
app
pet
cert
coal
act
permit
assignments
successors
defunct
inactive
signatory
operators
first
three
years
act
health
care
costs
orphaned
miners
shared
among
signatories
starting
fourth
year
payment
deducted
first
interest
earned
department
interior
abandoned
mine
reclamation
fund
aml
funds
exhausted
unavailable
costs
shared
remaining
signatories
availability
interest
transfers
may
delay
another
financial
crisis
noted
aml
funds
earmarked
purposes
see
ed
crs
report
coal
industry
use
abandoned
mine
reclamation
fund
monies
umwa
orphan
retiree
health
benefits
cong
rec
first
priority
goes
mining
abandonments
present
imminent
danger
public
health
safety
remaining
aml
funds
designated
eliminate
environmental
hazards
moreover
given
high
cost
health
care
retired
miners
likely
diminution
fund
interest
earning
capacity
see
interest
may
last
long