pennsylvania
finley
argued
march
decided
may
respondent
convicted
murder
sentenced
life
imprisonment
pennsylvania
trial
pennsylvania
affirmed
direct
appeal
respondent
subsequent
postconviction
proceedings
trial
required
state
law
appointed
counsel
assist
counsel
reviewed
trial
record
consulted
respondent
concluded
arguable
bases
collateral
review
advised
trial
writing
conclusion
requested
permission
withdraw
reviewing
record
agreed
arguably
meritorious
issues
dismissed
proceedings
respondent
acquired
new
appointed
counsel
appealed
pennsylvania
superior
concluded
counsel
conduct
trial
violated
respondent
constitutional
rights
remanded
case
proceedings
superior
relied
anders
california
held
attorney
appointed
represent
indigent
defendant
direct
appeal
finds
case
wholly
frivolous
must
request
permission
withdraw
submit
brief
referring
anything
record
arguably
supporting
appeal
copy
brief
must
furnished
indigent
time
must
allowed
raise
points
chooses
must
decide
whether
case
wholly
frivolous
held
improperly
relied
federal
constitution
extend
anders
procedures
collateral
postconviction
proceedings
denial
counsel
indigents
first
appeal
right
amounts
discrimination
poor
violation
fourteenth
amendment
anders
established
prophylactic
framework
relevant
litigant
previously
established
constitutional
right
counsel
right
appointed
counsel
extends
first
appeal
right
since
defendant
federal
constitutional
right
counsel
pursuing
discretionary
appeal
direct
review
conviction
ross
moffitt
fortiori
right
attacking
postconviction
proceedings
conviction
become
final
upon
exhaustion
appellate
process
anders
procedures
apply
right
counsel
postconviction
review
applied
right
counsel
first
appeal
right
respondent
access
lawyer
result
state
decision
command
federal
constitution
procedures
followed
trial
counsel
postconviction
proceedings
fully
comported
fundamental
fairness
mandated
due
process
clause
obligation
provide
postconviction
relief
fundamental
fairness
mandated
due
process
clause
require
state
supply
lawyer
well
equal
protection
guarantee
meaningful
access
violated
case
moreover
merit
respondent
contention
state
granted
prisoner
access
counsel
postconviction
review
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
requires
counsel
actions
comport
anders
procedures
evitts
lucey
distinguished
pennsylvania
made
valid
choice
give
prisoners
assistance
counsel
proceedings
without
requiring
full
panoply
procedural
protections
constitution
requires
given
defendants
fundamentally
different
position
trial
first
appeal
right
pp
super
reversed
remanded
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
white
powell
scalia
joined
blackmun
filed
opinion
concurring
judgment
post
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
marshall
joined
post
stevens
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
gaele
mclaughlin
barthold
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
ann
lebowitz
ronald
eisenberg
william
chadwick
catherine
harper
appointment
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
linley
pearson
attorney
general
indiana
william
daily
lisa
paunicka
deputy
attorneys
general
filed
brief
state
indiana
et
al
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
joined
officials
respective
follows
john
van
de
kamp
attorney
general
california
john
kelly
chief
state
attorney
connecticut
charles
oberly
attorney
general
delaware
jim
smith
attorney
general
florida
corinne
watanabe
attorney
general
hawaii
jim
jones
attorney
general
idaho
robert
stephan
attorney
general
kansas
david
armstrong
attorney
general
kentucky
william
guste
attorney
general
louisiana
william
webster
attorney
general
missouri
travis
medlock
attorney
general
south
carolina
mary
sue
terry
attorney
general
virginia
bronson
lafollette
attorney
general
wisconsin
archie
mcclintock
attorney
general
wyoming
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
american
civil
liberties
union
et
al
larry
yackle
alvin
bronstein
vivian
berger
david
goldstein
stefan
presser
national
legal
aid
defender
association
david
bergschneider
chief
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
respondent
convicted
murder
common
pleas
philadelphia
county
sentenced
life
imprisonment
appointed
trial
attorney
appealed
conviction
pennsylvania
unanimously
affirmed
conviction
failed
direct
appeal
respondent
proceeding
pro
se
sought
relief
trial
pennsylvania
post
conviction
hearing
act
see
cons
stat
et
seq
raised
issues
pennsylvania
rejected
merits
trial
denied
relief
state
reversed
holding
respondent
entitled
state
law
appointed
counsel
postconviction
proceedings
remand
trial
appointed
counsel
counsel
reviewed
trial
record
consulted
respondent
concluded
arguable
bases
collateral
relief
accordingly
advised
trial
writing
conclusion
requested
permission
withdraw
trial
conducted
independent
review
record
agreed
issues
even
arguably
meritorious
thus
dismissed
petition
postconviction
relief
respondent
acquired
new
appointed
counsel
pursued
appeal
superior
dissent
concluded
conduct
counsel
trial
postconviction
proceedings
violated
respondent
constitutional
rights
super
held
pennsylvania
law
concerning
procedures
followed
attorney
sees
basis
appeal
derived
seminal
case
anders
california
pa
anders
held
attorney
appointed
represent
indigent
defendant
direct
appeal
finds
case
wholly
frivolous
advise
request
permission
withdraw
request
must
however
accompanied
brief
referring
anything
record
might
arguably
support
appeal
copy
counsel
brief
furnished
indigent
time
allowed
raise
points
chooses
counsel
proceeds
full
examination
proceedings
decide
whether
case
wholly
frivolous
think
improperly
relied
constitution
extend
anders
procedures
postconviction
proceedings
holding
anders
based
underlying
constitutional
right
appointed
counsel
established
douglas
california
relying
equality
demanded
fourteenth
amendment
douglas
held
denial
counsel
indigents
first
appeal
right
amounted
unconstitutional
discrimination
poor
anders
held
order
protect
constitutional
requirement
substantial
equality
fair
process
set
douglas
appointed
appellate
counsel
must
follow
procedures
described
case
appears
frivolous
course
anders
set
independent
constitutional
command
lawyers
proceedings
must
follow
particular
procedures
rather
anders
established
prophylactic
framework
relevant
litigant
previously
established
constitutional
right
counsel
never
held
prisoners
constitutional
right
counsel
mounting
collateral
attacks
upon
convictions
see
johnson
avery
decline
hold
today
cases
establish
right
appointed
counsel
extends
first
appeal
right
thus
rejected
suggestions
establish
right
counsel
discretionary
appeals
wainwright
torna
ross
moffitt
think
since
defendant
federal
constitutional
right
counsel
pursuing
discretionary
appeal
direct
review
conviction
fortiori
right
attacking
conviction
long
since
become
final
upon
exhaustion
appellate
process
see
boyd
dutton
powell
dissenting
ross
moffitt
supra
analyzed
defendant
claim
appointed
counsel
discretionary
review
two
theories
concluded
fundamental
fairness
exacted
due
process
clause
require
appointment
counsel
ordinarily
defendant
rather
state
initiates
appellate
process
seeking
fend
efforts
state
prosecutor
rather
overturn
finding
guilt
made
judge
jury
defendant
needs
attorney
appeal
shield
protect
haled
state
stripped
presumption
innocence
rather
sword
upset
prior
determination
guilt
difference
significant
one
agree
state
may
simply
dispense
trial
stage
proceedings
without
criminal
defendant
consent
clear
state
need
provide
appeal
mckane
durston
fact
appeal
provided
automatically
mean
state
acts
unfairly
refusing
provide
counsel
indigent
defendants
every
stage
way
considerations
apply
even
force
postconviction
review
first
reject
respondent
argument
anders
procedures
applied
right
counsel
postconviction
review
applied
right
counsel
first
appeal
established
douglas
respondent
apparently
believes
right
counsel
one
meaning
matter
source
right
fact
defendant
afforded
assistance
counsel
form
end
inquiry
federal
constitutional
purposes
rather
source
right
lawyer
assistance
combined
nature
proceedings
controls
constitutional
question
case
respondent
access
lawyer
result
state
decision
command
constitution
think
analysis
followed
ross
forecloses
respondent
constitutional
claim
procedures
followed
respondent
habeas
counsel
fully
comported
fundamental
fairness
postconviction
relief
even
removed
criminal
trial
discretionary
direct
review
part
criminal
proceeding
fact
considered
civil
nature
see
fay
noia
collateral
attack
normally
occurs
defendant
failed
secure
relief
direct
review
conviction
obligation
provide
avenue
relief
cf
maccollom
plurality
opinion
fundamental
fairness
mandated
due
process
clause
require
state
supply
lawyer
well
equal
protection
guarantee
meaningful
access
violated
case
time
respondent
presented
application
postconviction
relief
represented
trial
pennsylvania
ross
concluded
defendant
access
trial
record
appellate
briefs
opinions
provided
sufficient
tools
pro
se
litigant
gain
meaningful
access
courts
possess
discretionary
power
review
think
conclusion
necessarily
obtains
respect
postconviction
review
since
respondent
underlying
constitutional
right
appointed
counsel
state
postconviction
proceedings
constitutional
right
insist
anders
procedures
designed
solely
protect
underlying
constitutional
right
respondent
relies
evitts
lucey
proposition
even
though
state
need
grant
prisoner
access
counsel
postconviction
review
done
due
process
clause
fourteenth
amendment
requires
counsel
actions
comport
procedures
enumerated
anders
evitts
held
state
penalize
criminal
defendant
dismissing
first
appeal
right
appointed
counsel
failed
follow
mandatory
appellate
rules
ruling
rejected
state
argument
since
need
provide
appeal
first
place
see
mckane
durston
cut
defendant
appeal
without
running
afoul
due
process
clause
noting
right
appeal
unique
among
state
actions
withdrawn
without
consideration
applicable
due
process
norms
reasoned
state
opts
act
field
action
significant
discretionary
elements
must
nonetheless
act
accord
dictates
constitution
particular
accord
due
process
clause
respondent
argues
allowing
counsel
represent
without
complying
anders
common
pleas
improperly
deprived
right
effective
assistance
think
evitts
provides
respondent
comfort
initially
substantive
holding
evitts
state
may
cut
right
appeal
lawyer
ineffectiveness
depends
constitutional
right
appointed
counsel
exist
state
habeas
proceedings
important
however
fact
unlike
prisoner
evitts
actually
deprived
right
appeal
respondent
suffered
deprivation
assuming
moment
due
process
clause
relevant
cf
wainright
torna
per
curiam
polk
county
dodson
common
pleas
found
respondent
right
counsel
pennsylvania
law
satisfied
conduct
appointed
counsel
combined
independent
review
record
superior
disagree
holding
rather
ruled
anders
required
even
assistance
matter
federal
constitutional
law
rejected
conclusion
therefore
state
obligations
matter
federal
state
law
fulfilled
since
respondent
received
exactly
entitled
receive
state
law
independent
review
record
competent
counsel
claim
deprivation
without
due
process
bottom
decision
rests
premise
unwilling
accept
state
chooses
offer
help
seeking
relief
convictions
federal
constitution
dictates
exact
form
assistance
must
assume
contrary
area
substantial
discretion
develop
implement
programs
aid
prisoners
seeking
secure
postconviction
review
pennsylvania
state
made
valid
choice
give
prisoners
assistance
counsel
without
requiring
full
panoply
procedural
protections
constitution
requires
given
defendants
fundamentally
different
position
trial
first
appeal
right
context
constitution
put
state
difficult
choice
affording
counsel
whatsoever
following
strict
procedural
guidelines
annunciated
anders
judgment
superior
reversed
cause
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
agree
conclusion
superior
erred
belief
constitution
required
application
procedures
mandated
anders
california
case
view
however
remand
superior
able
consider
whether
appointed
counsel
review
respondent
case
adequate
pennsylvania
law
pennsylvania
remand
order
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
joins
dissenting
respondent
appeal
denial
state
collateral
relief
pennsylvania
held
state
law
required
dorothy
finley
counsel
review
record
carefully
amend
petition
relief
file
brief
behalf
remand
however
counsel
advised
trial
common
pleas
summarily
dismiss
petition
today
reverses
subsequent
determination
appellate
superior
performance
dorothy
finley
trial
counsel
deficient
failure
comply
three
different
sets
requirements
established
anders
california
commonwealth
mcclendon
remand
order
issued
originally
pennsylvania
pennsylvania
courts
may
comply
either
anders
mcclendon
procedures
appointed
counsel
wishes
withdraw
representation
petitioner
collateral
attack
upon
judgment
super
anders
procedures
require
counsel
perform
conscientious
evaluation
record
write
brief
referring
arguable
support
record
give
notice
client
trial
may
grant
counsel
request
withdraw
full
examination
record
anders
california
supra
mcclendon
procedures
require
exhaustive
examination
record
counsel
independent
determination
petition
wholly
frivolous
anders
brief
notice
client
required
pa
addition
finding
trial
counsel
complied
neither
two
sets
requirements
state
appellate
found
lower
failed
comply
specific
requirements
remand
order
state
circumstance
appellate
decision
rested
independent
state
ground
petition
certiorari
dismissed
improvidently
granted
moreover
controversy
involving
application
anders
procedures
ripe
review
finally
believe
counsel
deficient
performance
violated
finley
federal
rights
due
process
equal
protection
therefore
dissent
failure
trial
ensure
compliance
state
instructions
remand
independent
state
ground
appellate
decision
exhausting
direct
appeals
criminal
convictions
finley
filed
pro
se
application
collateral
relief
pursuant
pennsylvania
post
conviction
hearing
act
cons
stat
et
seq
pcha
trial
summarily
denied
petition
pennsylvania
reversed
held
finley
entitled
appointed
counsel
indigent
since
pcha
required
appointment
counsel
assist
meaningful
manner
state
rely
refer
federal
statutory
constitutional
law
stated
right
counsel
guaranteed
pcha
denied
previous
pcha
petition
involving
issues
determined
adversely
petitioner
proceeding
pcha
petition
ibid
emphasis
added
finley
previously
filed
pcha
petition
therefore
right
counsel
state
instructed
appointed
counsel
limit
efforts
claims
raised
finley
explore
legal
grounds
complaint
investigate
underlying
facts
articulate
claims
relief
trial
instructed
allow
counsel
amend
petition
remand
finley
counsel
failed
meet
requirements
appointed
counsel
read
notes
testimony
original
trial
failed
indicate
trial
conducted
exhaustive
research
record
pa
instead
filing
brief
amending
complaint
remand
order
required
simply
submitted
letter
describing
limited
review
listing
identical
issues
previously
presented
pennsylvania
direct
appeal
collateral
attack
stating
regarded
claims
meritless
finley
receive
advance
notice
either
counsel
latter
filing
letter
maintaining
claims
without
merit
tr
oral
arg
indeed
evidence
finley
ever
received
copy
letter
attorney
also
failed
inform
finley
right
seek
new
counsel
proceed
pro
se
trial
pa
receiving
letter
trial
dismissed
finley
petition
without
hearing
new
counsel
appointed
represent
finley
appeal
dismissal
superior
reversed
noting
trial
failed
follow
required
instructions
state
remand
based
interpretation
pcha
pennsylvania
remanded
saw
particular
merit
contentions
raised
time
identical
disposed
earlier
appellant
direct
appeal
wished
afford
appellant
opportunity
amass
issues
arguable
merit
pa
superior
cited
rule
pennsylvania
rules
criminal
procedure
basis
earlier
remand
order
rule
requires
counsel
act
advocate
fulfilling
role
pa
superior
stated
finley
appellant
counsel
able
list
several
issues
may
arguable
merit
simply
reviewing
bare
record
available
superior
citing
brief
appellant
thus
trial
failure
require
submitted
brief
amended
complaint
satisfy
mandate
state
effective
counsel
provided
finley
first
pcha
petition
since
trial
counsel
failed
amend
petition
submit
brief
proceeding
fact
uncounselled
pennsylvania
law
citation
omitted
reliance
state
grounds
independently
adequately
justified
superior
remand
need
plain
statement
indicating
independence
state
grounds
since
federal
law
interwoven
determination
see
michigan
long
indeed
superior
referred
state
law
purpose
basing
reversal
trial
decision
grounds
independent
anders
mcclendon
pa
result
need
address
issue
general
requirements
govern
representation
collateral
proceedings
pennsylvania
much
less
whether
anders
applicable
ii
anders
issue
ripe
review
yet
another
reason
superior
decision
leaves
trial
discretion
remand
impose
requirements
either
anders
mcclendon
long
also
complies
requirements
imposed
original
remand
order
pennsylvania
see
pa
trial
satisfied
neither
requirements
anders
mcclendon
superior
remanded
case
specify
set
procedures
trial
follow
conjecture
anders
requirements
may
never
imposed
case
given
alternative
availability
mcclendon
source
duties
pennsylvania
present
case
decided
superior
held
mcclendon
procedures
anders
requirements
required
collateral
review
commonwealth
mcgeth
super
pennsylvania
never
held
anders
procedures
required
collateral
review
commonwealth
lowenberg
state
equally
divided
issue
therefore
affirmed
lower
ruling
anders
procedures
required
direct
appeal
criminal
conviction
collateral
review
pennsylvania
require
anders
followed
collateral
review
occasion
today
decision
also
unnecessary
decide
case
adequacy
mcclendon
procedures
commonwealth
oppose
imposition
mcclendon
requirements
indeed
commonwealth
approves
mcclendon
requirements
flexible
enlightened
approach
brief
petitioner
since
clear
parties
case
adversarial
legal
interests
case
controversy
regarding
adequacy
mcclendon
see
steffel
thompson
order
avoid
issuing
advisory
opinion
await
final
judgment
pennsylvania
requires
imposition
anders
procedures
since
review
trial
eventual
decision
may
sought
later
state
appellate
courts
avoid
prematurely
reversing
decision
inferior
state
thus
dismiss
petition
improvidently
granted
iii
also
disagree
holding
trial
counsel
abandonment
client
without
notice
advocacy
finley
petition
violate
federal
rights
due
process
equal
protection
denigrates
finley
right
effective
assistance
counsel
noting
case
involves
postconviction
review
trial
argues
review
similar
discretionary
appellate
review
appointment
counsel
required
federal
constitution
ross
moffitt
see
ante
case
however
readily
distinguished
ross
state
law
finley
mandatory
right
effective
assistance
counsel
trial
required
review
issues
arguable
merit
construing
pcha
legislation
pennsylvania
concluded
pause
note
mandatory
appointment
requirement
salutary
one
best
comports
efficient
judicial
administration
serious
consideration
prisoner
claims
counsel
ability
frame
issues
legally
meaningful
fashion
insures
trial
relevant
considerations
brought
attention
commonwealth
mitchell
justifies
holding
ground
state
may
refuse
indigent
prisoners
assistance
counsel
therefore
lesser
power
deliver
inadequate
legal
services
long
settled
even
right
counsel
required
federal
constitution
state
affords
right
must
ensure
withdrawn
manner
inconsistent
equal
protection
due
process
see
evitts
lucey
ross
moffitt
supra
johnson
avery
smith
bennett
due
process
emphasizes
fairness
state
individual
dealing
state
ross
moffitt
supra
undamental
fairness
entitles
indigent
defendants
adequate
opportunity
present
claims
fairly
within
adversary
system
ake
oklahoma
citation
omitted
view
federal
constitution
requires
anders
procedures
must
followed
state
provides
assistance
counsel
collateral
proceedings
previously
explained
requirement
force
appointed
counsel
brief
case
client
merely
afford
latter
advocacy
nonindigent
defendant
able
obtain
also
induce
pursue
vigorously
review
ready
references
record
also
legal
authorities
furnished
counsel
merit
letter
hand
affords
neither
client
aid
former
must
shift
entirely
cold
record
must
review
without
help
advocate
moreover
handling
tend
protect
counsel
constantly
increasing
charge
ineffective
handled
case
diligence
indigent
defendant
entitled
anders
california
performance
finley
counsel
also
violated
equal
protection
clause
equal
protection
demands
eliminate
unfair
disparities
classes
individuals
rational
basis
assuming
petitions
submitted
indigent
collateral
review
less
meritorious
defendants
hard
believe
retained
counsel
file
letter
advocates
dismissal
client
case
without
notice
client
without
conducting
conscientious
assessment
record
since
impoverished
prisoner
must
take
whatever
state
affords
imperative
efforts
counsel
scrutinized
indigent
receives
adequate
representation
equal
protection
therefore
requires
imposition
anders
requirements
otherwise
indigent
record
unclear
errors
hidden
right
meaningless
ritual
person
afford
obtains
meaningful
review
douglas
california
iv
transforms
finley
right
effective
counsel
right
meaningless
ritual
face
identification
superior
three
possible
means
ensuring
adequate
representation
without
jurisdiction
render
decision
respect
independence
state
courts
well
avoidance
rendering
advisory
opinions
cornerstones
refusal
decide
cases
adequate
independent
state
ground
michigan
long
therefore
dismiss
petition
improvidently
granted
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
finley
appellate
counsel
raised
number
issues
arguable
merit
establish
sixth
amendment
violations
ineffective
assistance
counsel
see
brief
respondent
superior
acknowledged
pennsylvania
appellate
courts
always
require
trial
courts
follow
anders
procedure
may
allow
appointed
counsel
withdraw
lower
complies
alternative
requirements
enunciated
pennsylvania
commonwealth
mcclendon
pa
ompliance
unnecessary
counsel
conducted
exhaustive
examination
record
lower
concludes
petitioner
claims
completely
frivolous
superior
found
mcclendon
requirements
satisfied
mention
exhaustive
search
required
finding
case
wholly
frivolous
counsel
must
certify
exhaustive
reading
endeavor
uncover
possible
issues
review
frivolity
appeal
may
determined
lower
appellate
level
pa
footnotes
omitted
superior
instructions
trial
follows
since
procedures
utilized
herein
defective
acted
deprive
appellant
right
adequate
representation
remand
evidentiary
hearing
claims
raised
appellant
brief
issues
discerned
counsel
exhaustive
search
record
accordance
opinion
several
additional
reasons
decide
validity
mcclendon
requirements
first
holding
determines
applicability
mcclendon
requirements
collateral
review
proceedings
inappropriate
lack
final
judgment
since
trial
yet
chosen
procedure
follow
final
judgment
decree
review
cf
republic
gas
oklahoma
second
validity
mcclendon
requirements
issue
case
briefed
litigants
third
mcclendon
issue
ripe
review
trial
may
decide
impose
mcclendon
requirements
thus
opinion
issue
impressible
advisory
opinion
approach
consistent
past
practices
long
considered
practice
decide
abstract
hypothetical
contingent
questions
decide
constitutional
question
advance
necessity
decision
formulate
rule
constitutional
law
broader
required
precise
facts
applied
decide
constitutional
question
except
reference
particular
facts
applied
public
workers
mitchell
see
also
cox
broadcasting
cohn
rehnquist
dissenting
instant
case
commonwealth
sought
discretionary
review
superior
decision
pennsylvania
review
granted
matter
briefed
argued
however
ordered
appeal
dismissed
improvidently
granted
pennsylvania
law
state
refusal
review
decision
merits
see
commonwealth
britton
dayton
dayton
right
counsel
collateral
review
special
significance
finley
superior
found
several
arguably
meritorious
issues
indicate
effective
assistance
counsel
rendered
trial
resulted
conviction
handling
postconviction
petition
pa
disagree
interpretation
commonwealth
obligations
matter
state
law
conclusively
determined
trial
view
therefore
today
holding
preclude
determination
case
commonwealth
laws
constitution
see
south
dakota
opperman
marshall
dissenting
justice
stevens
dissenting
without
bothering
identify
basis
federal
jurisdiction
case
blithely
assumes
decision
rest
independent
adequate
state
ground
agree
state
procedural
rules
often
patterned
federal
precedents
nonetheless
rules
state
law
case
pennsylvania
superior
explicitly
stated
applying
pennsylvania
law
concerning
procedures
followed
attorney
sees
basis
appeal
super
emphasis
added
federal
precedents
simply
noted
state
law
area
derived
decision
anders
california
thus
believe
plain
statement
test
michigan
long
satisfied
decision
review
rested
independent
adequate
state
grounds
moreover
seems
rather
clear
reasons
stated
part
justice
brennan
dissent
decision
rest
alone
portion
discussion
conceivably
considered
based
anders
see
ante
either
event
basis
concluding
pennsylvania
superior
decision
remand
case
stemmed
belief
federal
constitution
required
even
believed
relied
federal
precedents
sacrosanct
plain
statement
missing
still
conclude
lacks
jurisdiction
case
unrealistic
quite
unfair
expect
judges
philadelphia
office
superior
pennsylvania
acquire
retain
familiarity
jurisprudence
concerning
intricacies
jurisdiction
occasions
decisions
judges
office
subject
direct
review
far
rare
make
appropriate
become
familiar
michigan
long
presumption
denigrating
enough
require
justices
state
courts
include
statement
decisions
without
demanding
state
appellate
judges
state
judges
decide
cases
conceivably
reviewed
commonwealth
pennsylvania
petitioned
writ
certiorari
sought
review
superior
judgment
pennsylvania
done
accepted
jurisdiction
petition
cases
originating
state
may
reviewed
unless
judgment
rendered
highest
state
decision
pennsylvania
dismissed
commonwealth
appeal
improvidently
granted
accompany
order
statement
reasons
thus
way
knowing
whether
action
based
correct
interpretation
pennsylvania
law
incorrect
interpretation
federal
law
opinion
due
respect
courts
well
separate
interest
avoidance
rendering
advisory
opinions
michigan
long
supra
strongly
favors
former
presumption
take
yet
another
step
path
marked
michigan
long
see
delaware
van
arsdall
stevens
dissenting
instead
dismiss
writ
want
jurisdiction
respectfully
dissent
figures
based
statistics
reported
two
recent
publications
see
conference
state
administrators
statistics
information
project
national
center
state
courts
roper
elsner
flango
state
appellate
jurisdiction
guide
statistical
reporting
figure
appellate
judges
national
center
state
courts
state
caseload
statistics
annual
report
pp
june
figure
judges