taylor
louisiana
argued
october
decided
january
appellant
male
convicted
crime
petit
jury
selected
venire
women
selected
pursuant
system
resulting
louisiana
constitutional
statutory
requirements
woman
selected
jury
service
unless
previously
filed
written
declaration
desire
subject
jury
service
state
affirmed
rejected
appellant
challenge
constitutionality
state
scheme
held
appellant
standing
make
constitutional
claim
rule
claim
may
asserted
defendants
members
group
excluded
jury
service
peters
kiff
requirement
petit
jury
selected
representative
cross
section
community
fundamental
jury
trial
guaranteed
sixth
amendment
violated
systematic
exclusion
women
jury
panels
judicial
district
involved
amounted
citizens
eligible
jury
service
pp
adequate
justification
shown
challenged
provisions
right
jury
selected
fair
cross
section
community
overcome
merely
rational
grounds
pp
longer
held
women
class
may
excluded
jury
service
given
automatic
exemptions
based
solely
sex
consequence
criminal
jury
venires
almost
male
contrary
implications
prior
cases
hoyt
florida
followed
pp
white
delivered
opinion
douglas
brennan
stewart
marshall
blackmun
powell
joined
burger
concurred
result
rehnquist
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
william
mcm
king
argued
cause
filed
brief
appellant
kendall
vick
assistant
attorney
general
louisiana
argued
cause
appellee
brief
william
guste
attorney
general
walter
smith
woodrow
erwin
justice
white
delivered
opinion
case
tried
art
vii
louisiana
constitution
art
louisiana
code
criminal
procedure
provided
woman
selected
jury
service
unless
previously
filed
written
declaration
desire
subject
jury
service
constitutionality
provisions
issue
case
appellant
billy
taylor
indicted
grand
jury
tammany
parish
judicial
district
louisiana
aggravated
kidnaping
april
appellant
moved
trial
quash
petit
jury
venire
drawn
special
criminal
term
beginning
trial
following
day
appellant
alleged
women
systematically
excluded
venire
therefore
deprived
claimed
federal
constitutional
right
fair
trial
jury
representative
segment
community
judicial
district
comprises
parishes
tammany
washington
appellee
stipulated
persons
eligible
jury
service
parishes
female
persons
jury
wheel
tammany
parish
women
period
december
november
females
among
persons
drawn
fill
petit
jury
venires
tammany
parish
also
stipulated
discrepancy
females
eligible
jury
service
actually
included
venire
result
operation
la
art
vii
la
code
crim
art
present
case
venire
totaling
persons
drawn
jury
service
beginning
april
females
venire
appellant
motion
quash
venire
denied
day
tried
convicted
sentenced
death
appellant
sought
review
louisiana
renewed
claim
petit
jury
venire
quashed
louisiana
recognizing
claim
drew
question
constitutionality
provisions
louisiana
constitution
code
criminal
procedure
dealing
service
women
juries
squarely
held
one
justice
dissenting
provisions
valid
unconstitutional
federal
law
appellant
appealed
decision
noted
probable
jurisdiction
consider
whether
louisiana
system
deprived
appellant
sixth
fourteenth
amendment
right
impartial
jury
trial
hold
amendments
violated
case
operation
la
art
vii
la
code
crim
art
consequence
appellant
conviction
must
reversed
ii
louisiana
system
disqualify
women
jury
service
operation
conceded
systematic
impact
women
grossly
disproportionate
number
eligible
women
community
called
jury
service
case
women
venire
petit
jury
drawn
issue
therefore
whether
system
operates
exclude
jury
service
identifiable
class
citizens
constituting
eligible
jurors
community
comports
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
state
first
insists
taylor
male
standing
object
exclusion
women
jury
taylor
claim
constitutionally
entitled
jury
drawn
venire
constituting
fair
cross
section
community
jury
tried
jury
reason
exclusion
women
taylor
member
excluded
class
rule
claims
taylor
presents
may
made
defendants
members
group
excluded
jury
service
peters
kiff
defendant
white
man
challenged
conviction
ground
negroes
systematically
excluded
jury
service
six
members
agreed
petitioner
entitled
present
issue
concluded
deprived
federal
rights
taylor
case
us
similarly
entitled
tender
adjudicated
claim
exclusion
women
jury
service
deprived
kind
factfinder
constitutionally
entitled
iii
background
case
must
decided
includes
holding
duncan
louisiana
sixth
amendment
provision
jury
trial
made
binding
virtue
fourteenth
amendment
inquiry
whether
presence
fair
cross
section
community
venires
panels
lists
petit
juries
drawn
essential
fulfillment
sixth
amendment
guarantee
impartial
jury
trial
criminal
prosecutions
prior
cases
instructive
course
exercising
supervisory
powers
trials
federal
courts
constitutional
context
unambiguously
declared
american
concept
jury
trial
contemplates
jury
drawn
fair
cross
section
community
unanimous
stated
smith
texas
part
established
tradition
use
juries
instruments
public
justice
jury
body
truly
representative
community
exclude
racial
groups
jury
service
said
war
basic
concepts
democratic
society
representative
government
state
jury
system
resulted
systematic
exclusion
negroes
jurors
therefore
held
violate
equal
protection
clause
fourteenth
amendment
glasser
context
federal
criminal
case
sixth
amendment
jury
trial
requirement
stated
ur
notions
proper
jury
developed
harmony
basic
concepts
democratic
society
representative
government
repeated
understanding
jury
body
truly
representative
community
organ
special
group
class
federal
conviction
jury
women
excluded
although
eligible
service
state
law
reviewed
ballard
noting
federal
statutory
design
make
jury
community
fact
women
excluded
exercised
supervisory
powers
federal
courts
reversed
conviction
brown
allen
declared
ur
duty
protect
federal
constitutional
rights
mean
must
impose
conception
proper
source
jury
lists
long
source
reasonably
reflects
population
suitable
character
intelligence
civic
duty
years
later
carter
jury
observed
exclusion
negroes
jury
service
race
contravenes
idea
jury
body
truly
representative
community
quoting
smith
texas
supra
time
contended
use
juries
noncapital
criminal
cases
violated
sixth
amendment
failure
provide
juries
drawn
cross
section
community
williams
florida
course
rejecting
challenge
said
number
persons
jury
large
enough
promote
group
deliberation
free
outside
attempts
intimidation
provide
fair
possibility
obtaining
representative
community
like
vein
apodaca
oregon
plurality
opinion
said
jury
come
commonsense
judgment
long
consists
group
laymen
representative
cross
section
community
duty
opportunity
deliberate
question
defendant
guilt
similarly
three
justices
peters
kiff
observed
sixth
amendment
comprehended
fair
possibility
obtaining
jury
constituting
representative
cross
section
community
unmistakable
import
opinions
least
since
smith
texas
supra
repudiated
intervening
decisions
selection
petit
jury
representative
cross
section
community
essential
component
sixth
amendment
right
jury
trial
recent
federal
legislation
governing
jury
selection
within
federal
system
similar
thrust
shortly
prior
decision
duncan
louisiana
supra
federal
jury
selection
service
act
enacted
act
congress
stated
policy
litigants
federal
courts
entitled
trial
jury
shall
right
grand
petit
juries
selected
random
fair
cross
section
community
district
division
wherein
convenes
act
congress
also
established
machinery
stated
policy
implemented
passing
legislation
committee
reports
house
senate
recognized
jury
plays
political
function
administration
law
requirement
jury
chosen
fair
cross
section
community
fundamental
american
system
justice
debate
floors
house
senate
act
invoked
sixth
amendment
constitution
generally
prior
decisions
support
act
accept
requirement
fundamental
jury
trial
guaranteed
sixth
amendment
convinced
requirement
solid
foundation
purpose
jury
guard
exercise
arbitrary
power
make
available
commonsense
judgment
community
hedge
overzealous
mistaken
prosecutor
preference
professional
perhaps
biased
response
judge
duncan
louisiana
prophylactic
vehicle
provided
jury
pool
made
special
segments
populace
large
distinctive
groups
excluded
pool
community
participation
administration
criminal
law
moreover
consistent
democratic
heritage
also
critical
public
confidence
fairness
criminal
justice
system
restricting
jury
service
special
groups
excluding
identifiable
segments
playing
major
roles
community
squared
constitutional
concept
jury
trial
trial
jury
presupposes
jury
drawn
pool
broadly
representative
community
well
impartial
specific
case
broad
representative
character
jury
maintained
partly
assurance
diffused
impartiality
partly
sharing
administration
justice
phase
civic
responsibility
thiel
southern
pacific
frankfurter
dissenting
iv
also
persuaded
requirement
violated
systematic
exclusion
women
judicial
district
involved
amounted
citizens
eligible
jury
service
conclusion
necessarily
entails
judgment
women
sufficiently
numerous
distinct
men
systematically
eliminated
jury
panels
sixth
amendment
requirement
satisfied
matter
debated
ballard
supra
positing
rule
said
statutory
one
concluded
systematic
exclusion
women
unacceptable
dissenting
view
panel
drawn
various
groups
community
truly
representative
women
included
firmly
rejected
thought
factors
tend
influence
action
women
influence
action
men
personality
background
economic
status
sex
yet
enough
say
women
sitting
jurors
neither
act
tend
act
class
men
likewise
act
class
shoe
foot
claim
jury
truly
representative
community
men
intentionally
systematically
excluded
panel
truth
two
sexes
fungible
community
made
exclusively
one
different
community
composed
subtle
interplay
influence
one
among
imponderables
insulate
either
may
given
case
make
iota
difference
yet
flavor
distinct
quality
lost
either
sex
excluded
exclusion
one
may
indeed
make
jury
less
representative
community
true
economic
racial
group
excluded
remains
argument
women
class
serve
distinctive
role
society
jury
service
substantially
interfere
function
state
ample
justification
excluding
women
service
unless
volunteer
even
though
result
almost
jurors
men
true
hoyt
florida
held
system
deny
due
process
law
equal
protection
laws
sufficiently
rational
basis
exemption
hoyt
involve
defendant
sixth
amendment
right
jury
drawn
fair
cross
section
community
prospect
depriving
right
women
class
systematically
excluded
right
proper
jury
overcome
merely
rational
grounds
must
weightier
reasons
distinctive
class
representing
eligible
jurors
practical
purposes
excluded
jury
service
basis
tendered
free
grant
exemptions
jury
service
individuals
case
special
hardship
incapacity
engaged
particular
occupations
uninterrupted
performance
critical
community
welfare
rawlins
georgia
appear
exemptions
pose
substantial
threats
remaining
pool
jurors
representative
community
system
excluding
women
however
wholly
different
matter
untenable
suggest
days
special
hardship
every
woman
perform
jury
service
society
spare
women
present
duties
may
case
many
may
burdensome
sort
exempted
serve
task
performed
case
men
administrative
convenience
dealing
women
class
insufficient
justification
diluting
quality
community
judgment
represented
jury
criminal
trials
vi
although
judgment
may
appear
foregone
conclusion
pattern
cases
past
years
well
legislative
developments
federal
state
levels
nevertheless
true
today
case
squarely
held
exclusion
women
jury
venires
deprives
criminal
defendant
sixth
amendment
right
trial
impartial
jury
drawn
fair
cross
section
community
apparent
first
congress
perceive
sixth
amendment
requiring
women
criminal
jury
panels
direction
first
judiciary
act
federal
jurors
qualifications
required
federal
sitting
time
women
disqualified
state
law
every
state
necessarily
federal
juries
criminal
cases
male
civil
rights
act
stat
ed
congress
provided
citizens
limited
exceptions
competent
sit
federal
juries
time
federal
courts
required
statute
exclude
women
jury
duty
women
disqualified
utah
first
state
qualify
women
juries
supra
moreover
hoyt
florida
decided
stood
proposition
even
women
group
constitutionally
disqualified
jury
service
ample
reason
treat
women
differently
men
purpose
jury
service
exclude
unless
volunteered
accepting
however
view
sixth
amendment
affords
defendant
criminal
trial
opportunity
jury
drawn
venires
representative
community
think
longer
tenable
hold
women
class
may
excluded
given
automatic
exemptions
based
solely
sex
consequence
criminal
jury
venires
almost
totally
male
extent
follow
contrary
implications
prior
cases
including
hoyt
florida
ever
case
women
unqualified
sit
juries
situated
none
required
perform
jury
service
time
long
since
passed
one
time
held
sixth
amendment
juries
must
drawn
fair
cross
section
community
requirement
permitted
almost
total
exclusion
women
case
today
communities
differ
different
times
places
fair
cross
section
one
time
place
necessarily
fair
cross
section
another
time
different
place
nothing
persuasive
presented
us
case
suggesting
venires
parishes
involved
fairly
representative
local
population
otherwise
eligible
jury
service
vii
holding
augur
authorize
fashioning
detailed
codes
federal
courts
principle
must
much
leeway
application
remain
free
prescribe
relevant
qualifications
jurors
provide
reasonable
exemptions
long
may
fairly
said
jury
lists
panels
representative
community
carter
jury
supra
brown
allen
supra
rawlins
georgia
supra
cases
recognized
broad
discretion
respect
depart
principles
enunciated
carter
said
louisiana
special
exemption
women
operates
exclude
petit
juries
view
contrary
command
sixth
fourteenth
amendments
also
emphasized
holding
petit
juries
must
drawn
source
fairly
representative
community
impose
requirement
petit
juries
actually
chosen
must
mirror
community
reflect
various
distinctive
groups
population
defendants
entitled
jury
particular
composition
fay
new
york
apodaca
oregon
plurality
opinion
jury
wheels
pools
names
panels
venires
juries
drawn
must
systematically
exclude
distinctive
groups
community
thereby
fail
reasonably
representative
thereof
judgment
louisiana
reversed
case
remanded
proceedings
inconsistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
la
code
crim
art
provided
woman
shall
selected
jury
service
unless
previously
filed
clerk
parish
resides
written
declaration
desire
subject
jury
service
provision
repealed
effective
january
repeal
however
effect
conviction
obtained
case
stipulation
appears
appendix
filed
edwards
healy
pending
ibid
death
sentence
imposed
appellant
annulled
set
aside
louisiana
accord
decision
furman
georgia
instructions
district
impose
life
sentence
remand
louisiana
granted
rehearing
appellant
certain
issues
relevant
appeal
later
denied
second
petition
rehearing
pub
stat
et
seq
must
remembered
jury
designed
understand
case
also
reflect
community
sense
justice
deciding
long
significant
departures
cross
sectional
goal
biased
juries
result
biased
sense
reflect
slanted
view
community
supposed
represent
see
jury
chosen
representative
community
sample
fundamental
system
justice
senate
house
reports
made
reference
decision
appeals
rabinowitz
sustaining
attack
composition
grand
petit
jury
venires
middle
district
georgia
held
constitution
prior
amendment
required
system
jury
selection
probably
result
fair
community
placed
jury
rolls
see
supra
supra
elimination
key
man
system
throughout
federal
courts
primary
focus
federal
jury
selection
service
act
see
supra
cong
rec
remarks
rogers
see
also
cong
rec
remarks
poff
cong
rec
remarks
machen
remarks
tydings
compare
peters
kiff
opinion
marshall
joined
douglas
stewart
jj
principles
compel
conclusion
state
consistent
due
process
subject
defendant
indictment
trial
jury
selected
arbitrary
discriminatory
manner
violation
constitution
laws
illegal
unconstitutional
jury
selection
procedures
cast
doubt
integrity
whole
judicial
process
create
appearance
bias
decision
individual
cases
increase
risk
actual
bias
well
exclusion
jury
service
substantial
identifiable
class
citizens
potential
impact
subtle
pervasive
admit
confinement
particular
issues
particular
cases
moreover
unwilling
make
assumption
exclusion
negroes
relevance
issues
involving
race
large
identifiable
segment
community
excluded
jury
service
effect
remove
jury
room
qualities
human
nature
varieties
human
experience
range
unknown
perhaps
unknowable
necessary
assume
excluded
group
consistently
vote
class
order
conclude
exclusion
deprives
jury
perspective
human
events
may
unsuspected
importance
case
may
presented
omitted
controlled
studies
performance
women
jurors
conducted
subsequent
decision
ballard
concluded
women
bring
juries
perspectives
values
influence
jury
deliberation
result
see
generally
rudolph
women
juries
voluntary
compulsory
jud
soc
sociology
social
research
applied
social
psychology
sociometry
relatively
modern
development
english
common
law
women
exception
trial
narrow
class
cases
considered
qualified
jury
service
virtue
doctrine
propter
defectum
sexus
defect
sex
blackstone
commentaries
rule
made
statutory
parliament
rejected
parliament
geo
country
women
disqualified
state
law
sit
jurors
end
century
first
deemed
qualified
jury
service
state
utah
rev
stat
tit
today
women
qualified
jurors
statutes
rules
face
extend
women
type
exemption
presently
although
exemption
provisions
appear
treat
men
women
differently
certain
respects
florida
stat
provided
grand
petit
jurors
taken
male
female
citizens
state
possessed
certain
qualifications
also
provided
name
female
person
shall
taken
jury
service
unless
said
person
registered
clerk
circuit
desire
placed
jury
list
hoyt
florida
state
interest
articulated
based
assumption
woman
still
regarded
center
home
family
life
hoyt
florida
supra
louisiana
makes
similar
argument
stating
grant
automatic
exemption
jury
service
females
involves
state
attempt
regulate
provide
stability
state
idea
family
life
brief
appellee
hoyt
determined
underlying
classification
rational
state
proffered
rationale
extending
exemption
females
without
family
responsibilities
justified
administrative
convenience
hoyt
florida
supra
placed
emphasis
notion
advanced
state
louisiana
support
rationality
statutory
scheme
woman
still
regarded
center
home
family
life
statistics
compiled
department
labor
indicate
october
women
years
age
labor
force
dept
labor
women
labor
force
additionally
march
women
children
age
labor
force
respect
families
containing
children
ages
six
mothers
widowed
divorced
separated
work
force
mothers
whose
husbands
present
household
work
force
even
family
units
husband
present
contained
child
three
years
old
mothers
work
force
dept
labor
marital
family
characteristics
labor
force
table
march
statistics
perhaps
speak
evolving
nature
structure
family
unit
american
society
nature
role
played
women
happen
members
family
unit
certainly
put
rest
suggestion
women
exempt
jury
service
based
solely
sex
presumed
role
home
section
act
provided
jurors
shall
qualifications
requisite
jurors
laws
state
citizens
serve
highest
courts
law
state
stat
hoyt
florida
fay
new
york
also
referred
historic
view
jury
service
constitutionally
confined
males
need
however
accept
appellant
invitation
canvass
case
continuing
validity
dictum
strauder
west
virginia
effect
state
may
constitutionally
confine
jury
duty
males
constitutional
proposition
gone
unquestioned
eighty
years
decisions
see
fay
new
york
supra
reflected
congressional
policy
respecting
jury
service
federal
courts
omitted
see
also
glasser
interesting
note
strauder
west
virginia
stated
constitution
juries
essential
part
protection
mode
trial
intended
secure
idea
jury
body
men
composed
peers
equals
person
whose
rights
selected
summoned
determine
neighbors
fellows
associates
persons
legal
status
society
holds
justice
rehnquist
dissenting
opinion
reverses
conviction
without
suggestion
much
less
showing
appellant
unfairly
treated
prejudiced
way
manner
jury
selected
invalidates
system
approved
substantial
majority
years
ago
disagree
affirm
judgment
louisiana
majority
opinion
canvasses
various
jury
trial
cases
beginning
smith
texas
relying
carefully
chosen
quotations
concludes
unmistakable
import
cases
requirement
essential
component
sixth
amendment
right
jury
trial
disagree
fairly
read
unmistakable
import
cases
due
process
equal
protection
prohibit
systems
likely
result
biased
partial
juries
smith
texas
supra
concerned
equal
protection
claim
negro
indicted
grand
jury
negroes
systematically
excluded
glasser
dealt
allegations
women
selected
jury
service
members
private
organization
conducted
classes
prospective
jurors
brown
allen
rejected
equal
protection
due
process
contentions
several
black
defendants
members
race
discriminatorily
excluded
juries
carter
jury
similarly
dealt
equal
protection
challenges
system
persons
claiming
rights
blacks
sought
serve
jurors
hoyt
florida
gave
plenary
consideration
contentions
system
louisiana
deprived
defendant
equal
protection
due
process
contentions
rejected
despite
circumstances
much
suggestive
possible
bias
prejudice
defendant
hoyt
woman
whose
defense
charges
murdering
husband
driven
temporarily
insane
suspected
infidelity
rejection
efforts
reconciliation
complete
swing
judicial
pendulum
years
later
must
depend
validity
proposition
years
things
changed
constitutionally
significant
ways
persuaded
sufficiency
either
majority
proffered
explanations
intervening
events
first
determinative
event
view
duncan
louisiana
sixth
amendment
held
applicable
feels
free
dismiss
hoyt
case
dealt
entirely
different
issues
even
though
fact
presented
identical
problem
duncan
rationale
good
deal
less
expansive
suggested
present
interpretation
case
duncan
rests
following
reasoning
test
determining
whether
right
extended
fifth
sixth
amendments
respect
federal
criminal
proceedings
also
protected
state
action
fourteenth
amendment
phrased
variety
ways
opinions
question
asked
whether
right
among
fundamental
principles
liberty
justice
lie
base
civil
political
institutions
powell
alabama
whether
basic
system
jurisprudence
oliver
whether
fundamental
right
essential
fair
trial
gideon
wainwright
malloy
hogan
pointer
texas
believe
trial
jury
criminal
cases
fundamental
american
scheme
justice
hold
fourteenth
amendment
guarantees
right
jury
trial
criminal
cases
emphasis
added
conceive
today
decision
necessary
guard
oppressive
arbitrary
law
enforcement
prevent
miscarriages
justice
assure
fair
trials
especially
criminal
defendant
involved
makes
claims
prejudice
bias
accord
slight
attention
justifying
ruling
terms
basis
right
jury
trial
read
fourteenth
amendment
concludes
jury
effective
prophylaxis
arbitrary
prosecutorial
judicial
power
jury
pool
made
special
segments
populace
large
distinctive
groups
excluded
pool
ante
fails
however
provide
satisfactory
explanation
mechanism
louisiana
system
undermines
prophylactic
role
jury
either
general
case
best
posit
flavor
distinct
quality
allegedly
lost
either
sex
excluded
ante
however
flavor
importance
constitution
offended
given
petit
jury
enriched
ante
smacks
mysticism
law
even
purport
practice
mysticism
consistent
fashion
presumably
doctors
lawyers
groups
whose
frequent
exemption
jury
service
endorsed
majority
also
offer
qualities
distinct
important
issue
hoyt
considered
stronger
due
process
claim
today
found
fundamental
fairness
offended
understand
intervening
decision
duncan
support
different
result
duncan
imported
sixth
amendment
due
process
clause
extent
perceived
required
fundamental
fairness
second
change
since
hoyt
appears
turnabout
societal
nature
encompassing
higher
degree
sensitivity
distinctions
based
sex
evolving
nature
structure
family
unit
american
society
ante
matters
degree
perhaps
significance
justice
harlan
saw
fit
refer
enlightened
emancipation
women
restrictions
protections
bygone
years
entry
many
parts
community
life
formerly
considered
reserved
men
hoyt
nonetheless
may
fair
conclude
louisiana
system
fact
anachronism
inappropriate
time
place
ante
surely
constitutional
adjudication
canalized
function
enforcing
perception
modern
life
absent
suggestion
appellant
trial
unfairly
conducted
result
unreliable
require
louisiana
retry
assuming
state
produce
evidence
witnesses
order
impose
sanctions
laws
provide