vermont
yankee
nuclear
power
nrdc
argued
november
decided
april
together
consumers
power
aeschliman
et
also
certiorari
extensive
hearings
atomic
safety
licensing
board
licensing
board
respondent
objections
atomic
energy
commission
aec
granted
petitioner
vermont
yankee
nuclear
power
license
operate
nuclear
power
plant
ruling
affirmed
atomic
safety
licensing
appeal
board
appeal
board
subsequently
aec
specifically
referring
appeal
board
decision
instituted
rulemaking
proceedings
deal
question
considering
environmental
effects
associated
uranium
fuel
cycle
individual
analyses
nuclear
power
reactors
proceedings
licensing
board
use
full
formal
adjudicatory
procedures
eventually
result
rulemaking
proceedings
aec
issued
fuel
cycle
rule
time
aec
approved
procedures
used
hearing
indicated
record
including
environmental
survey
provided
adequate
data
base
rule
adopted
ruled
extent
rule
differed
appeal
board
decision
decision
presidential
significance
since
environmental
effects
uranium
fuel
cycle
shown
relatively
insignificant
unnecessary
apply
rule
vermont
yankee
environmental
reports
submitted
prior
rule
effective
date
environmental
statements
circulated
comment
prior
date
respondents
appealed
aec
adoption
fuel
cycle
rule
decision
grant
vermont
yankee
license
respect
license
appeals
first
ruled
absence
effective
rulemaking
proceedings
aec
must
deal
environmental
impact
fuel
reprocessing
disposal
individual
licensing
proceedings
went
hold
despite
fact
appeared
aec
employed
procedures
required
administrative
procedure
act
apa
ed
rulemaking
proceedings
inadequate
overturned
rule
accordingly
aec
determination
respect
license
also
remanded
proceedings
examination
report
advisory
committee
reactor
safeguards
acrs
extensive
hearings
respondent
intervenors
objections
aec
granted
petitioner
consumers
power
permit
construct
two
nuclear
reactors
ruling
affirmed
appeal
board
time
council
environmental
quality
revised
regulations
governing
preparation
environmental
impact
statements
mention
first
time
necessity
considering
energy
conservation
one
alternatives
proposed
project
view
development
subsequent
aec
ruling
indicating
evidence
energy
conservation
necessarily
barred
threshold
aec
proceedings
one
intervenors
moved
reopen
permit
proceedings
energy
conservation
considered
aec
declined
reopen
proceedings
respondents
appealed
granting
construction
permit
appeals
held
environmental
impact
statement
construction
reactors
fatally
defective
failure
examine
energy
conservation
alternative
plants
size
acrs
report
inadequate
returned
acrs
elucidation
understandable
layman
remanded
case
appropriate
consideration
waste
disposal
unaddressed
issues
held
generally
speaking
ed
establishes
maximum
procedural
requirements
congress
willing
courts
impose
upon
federal
agencies
conducting
rulemaking
proceedings
agencies
free
grant
additional
procedural
rights
exercise
discretion
reviewing
courts
generally
free
impose
agencies
chosen
grant
even
apart
apa
formulation
procedures
basically
left
within
discretion
agencies
congress
confided
responsibility
substantive
judgments
pp
appeals
cases
seriously
misread
misapplied
statutory
decisional
law
cautioning
reviewing
courts
engrafting
notions
proper
procedures
upon
agencies
entrusted
substantive
functions
congress
moreover
appeals
decision
respect
agency
action
taken
full
adjudicatory
hearings
improperly
intruded
agency
process
pp
aec
acted
well
within
statutory
authority
considered
environmental
impact
fuel
processes
licensing
nuclear
reactors
pp
nothing
apa
national
environmental
policy
act
nepa
circumstances
case
nature
issues
considered
past
agency
practice
statutory
mandate
aec
operates
permitted
appeals
review
overturn
rulemaking
proceeding
basis
procedural
devices
employed
employed
aec
long
aec
used
least
statutory
minima
matter
doubt
pp
whether
challenged
rule
finds
sufficient
justification
administrative
proceedings
upheld
reviewing
case
remanded
appeals
may
review
rule
apa
provides
engage
kind
review
stray
beyond
judicial
province
explore
procedural
format
impose
upon
agency
notion
procedures
best
likely
vague
undefined
public
good
appeals
wrong
holding
rejection
energy
conservation
basis
threshold
test
capricious
arbitrary
inconsistent
nepa
basic
mandate
aec
since
rationale
basically
misconceives
scope
agency
statutory
responsibility
also
nature
administrative
process
thrust
agency
decision
type
issues
intervenors
trying
raise
seriously
mischaracterized
aec
threshold
test
placing
heavy
substantive
burdens
intervenors
contrary
aec
stated
procedure
requiring
showing
sufficient
require
reasonable
minds
inquire
procedure
well
within
agency
discretion
pp
appeals
holding
licensing
board
returned
acrs
report
acrs
elaboration
erroneous
unjustifiable
intrusion
administrative
process
nothing
relevant
statutes
justify
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
members
joined
except
blackmun
powell
took
part
consideration
decision
cases
thomas
dignan
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
marshall
moriarty
william
patton
gad
iii
charles
horsky
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
harold
reis
deputy
solicitor
general
wallace
argued
cause
federal
respondents
support
petitioners
cases
pursuant
rule
briefs
solicitor
general
mccree
acting
assistant
attorney
general
liotta
harriet
shapiro
edmund
clark
john
zimmerman
peter
strauss
stephen
eilperin
henry
nickel
george
freeman
filed
brief
respondents
baltimore
gas
electric
et
al
support
petitioner
pursuant
rule
richard
ayres
argued
cause
filed
briefs
respondents
myron
cherry
argued
cause
nonfederal
respondents
brief
peter
fn
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
cameron
macrae
leonard
trosten
harry
voigt
edison
electric
institute
et
al
leonard
theberge
john
cannon
edward
dowd
manning
muntzing
hans
bethe
et
al
max
dean
david
heller
labor
party
louis
lefkowitz
attorney
general
new
york
samuel
hirshowitz
first
assistant
attorney
general
philip
weinberg
john
shea
iii
assistant
attorneys
general
cabanne
howard
assistant
attorney
general
maine
ellyn
weiss
assistant
attorney
general
massachusetts
filed
brief
named
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
cases
joined
officials
respective
follows
william
baxley
attorney
general
alabama
henry
caddell
assistant
attorney
general
richard
wier
attorney
general
delaware
june
macartor
deputy
attorney
general
robert
shevin
attorney
general
florida
marty
friedman
assistant
attorney
general
arthur
bolton
attorney
general
georgia
robert
bomar
senior
assistant
attorney
general
william
scott
attorney
general
illinois
richard
cosby
assistant
attorney
general
curt
schneider
attorney
general
kansas
william
griffin
assistant
attorney
general
robert
stephens
attorney
general
kentucky
david
short
assistant
attorney
general
william
guste
attorney
general
louisiana
richard
troy
assistant
attorney
general
joseph
brennan
attorney
general
maine
francis
burch
attorney
general
maryland
warren
rich
assistant
attorney
general
francis
bellotti
attorney
general
massachusetts
frank
kelley
attorney
general
michigan
stewart
freeman
assistant
attorney
general
warren
spannaus
attorney
general
minnesota
jocelyn
olson
assistant
attorney
general
john
ashcroft
attorney
general
missouri
robert
lindholm
assistant
attorney
general
toney
anaya
attorney
general
new
mexico
james
huber
assistant
attorney
general
rufus
edmisten
attorney
general
north
carolina
dan
oakley
assistant
attorney
general
william
brown
attorney
general
ohio
david
northrup
assistant
attorney
general
james
redden
attorney
general
oregon
richard
sandvik
assistant
attorney
general
robert
kane
attorney
general
pennsylvania
douglas
blazey
assistant
attorney
general
john
hill
attorney
general
texas
troy
webb
paul
gosselink
assistant
attorneys
general
robert
hansen
attorney
general
utah
william
quigley
jerome
diamond
attorney
general
vermont
benson
scotch
assistant
attorney
general
bronson
lafollette
attorney
general
wisconsin
john
kofron
assistant
attorney
general
george
deptula
james
barnes
filed
brief
union
concerned
scientists
fund
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
ronald
zumbrun
raymond
momboisse
robert
best
albert
ferri
hugh
filed
brief
pacific
legal
foundation
amicus
curiae
cases
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
congress
enacted
administrative
procedure
act
noted
elsewhere
new
basic
comprehensive
regulation
procedures
many
agencies
wong
yang
sung
mcgrath
also
legislative
enactment
settled
contentions
enacts
formula
upon
opposing
social
political
forces
come
rest
section
act
ed
dealing
rulemaking
requires
subsection
notice
proposed
rule
making
shall
published
federal
register
describes
contents
notice
goes
require
subsection
notice
agency
shall
give
interested
persons
opportunity
participate
rule
making
submission
written
data
views
arguments
without
opportunity
oral
presentation
consideration
relevant
matter
presented
agency
shall
incorporate
rules
adopted
concise
general
statement
basis
purpose
interpreting
provision
act
steel
florida
east
coast
held
generally
speaking
section
act
established
maximum
procedural
requirements
congress
willing
courts
impose
upon
agencies
conducting
rulemaking
procedures
agencies
free
grant
additional
procedural
rights
exercise
discretion
reviewing
courts
generally
free
impose
agencies
chosen
grant
say
necessarily
circumstances
ever
justify
overturning
agency
action
failure
employ
procedures
beyond
required
statute
circumstances
exist
extremely
rare
even
apart
administrative
procedure
act
four
decades
emphasized
formulation
procedures
basically
left
within
discretion
agencies
congress
confided
responsibility
substantive
judgments
fcc
schreiber
explicated
principle
describing
outgrowth
congressional
determination
administrative
agencies
administrators
familiar
industries
regulate
better
position
federal
courts
congress
design
procedural
rules
adapted
peculiarities
industry
tasks
agency
involved
relied
earlier
case
fcc
pottsville
broadcasting
stated
provision
dealing
conduct
business
federal
communications
commission
delegated
commission
power
resolve
subordinate
questions
procedure
scope
inquiry
whether
applications
heard
contemporaneously
successively
whether
parties
allowed
intervene
one
another
proceedings
similar
questions
light
background
statutory
decisional
law
granted
certiorari
review
two
judgments
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
concern
seriously
misread
misapplied
statutory
decisional
law
cautioning
reviewing
courts
engrafting
notions
proper
procedures
upon
agencies
entrusted
substantive
functions
congress
conclude
appeals
done
cases
therefore
remand
proceedings
also
find
necessary
examine
appeals
decision
respect
agency
action
taken
full
adjudicatory
hearings
conclude
improperly
intruded
agency
decisionmaking
process
making
necessary
us
reverse
remand
respect
part
cases
also
atomic
energy
act
stat
amended
et
atomic
energy
commission
given
broad
regulatory
authority
development
nuclear
energy
terms
act
utility
seeking
construct
operate
nuclear
power
plant
must
obtain
separate
permit
license
construction
operation
stage
project
see
order
obtain
construction
permit
utility
must
file
preliminary
safety
analysis
report
environmental
report
certain
information
regarding
antitrust
implications
proposed
project
see
cfr
application
undergoes
exhaustive
review
commission
staff
advisory
committee
reactor
safeguards
acrs
group
distinguished
experts
field
atomic
energy
groups
submit
commission
evaluations
become
part
record
utility
application
see
commission
staff
also
undertakes
review
required
national
environmental
policy
act
nepa
stat
et
prepares
draft
environmental
impact
statement
circulated
comment
cfr
revised
becomes
final
environmental
impact
statement
thereupon
atomic
safety
licensing
board
conducts
public
adjudicatory
hearing
reaches
decision
appealed
atomic
safety
licensing
appeal
board
currently
commission
discretion
commission
cfr
final
agency
decision
may
appealed
courts
appeals
sort
process
occurs
utility
applies
license
operate
plant
cfr
except
hearing
need
held
contested
cases
may
limited
matters
controversy
see
cfr
cfr
pt
app
cases
arise
two
separate
decisions
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
first
remanded
decision
commission
grant
license
petitioner
vermont
yankee
nuclear
power
operate
nuclear
power
plant
natural
resources
defense
council
nrc
app
second
remanded
decision
agency
grant
permit
petitioner
consumers
power
construct
two
pressurized
water
nuclear
reactors
generate
electricity
steam
aeschliman
nrc
app
december
mandatory
adjudicatory
hearing
necessary
review
commission
granted
petitioner
vermont
yankee
permit
build
nuclear
power
plant
vernon
see
thereafter
vermont
yankee
applied
operating
license
respondent
natural
resources
defense
council
nrdc
objected
granting
license
however
therefore
hearing
application
commenced
august
excluded
consideration
hearings
nrdc
objection
issue
environmental
effects
operations
reprocess
fuel
dispose
wastes
resulting
reprocessing
operations
ruling
affirmed
appeal
board
june
november
however
commission
making
specific
reference
appeal
board
decision
respect
vermont
yankee
license
instituted
rulemaking
proceedings
specifically
deal
question
consideration
environmental
effects
associated
uranium
fuel
cycle
individual
analyses
light
water
cooled
nuclear
power
reactors
app
notice
proposed
rulemaking
offered
two
alternatives
predicated
report
prepared
commission
staff
entitled
environmental
survey
nuclear
fuel
cycle
first
required
quantitative
evaluation
environmental
hazards
fuel
reprocessing
disposal
environmental
survey
found
slight
second
specified
numerical
values
environmental
impact
part
fuel
cycle
values
incorporated
table
along
relevant
factors
determine
overall
balance
operating
license
see
much
controversy
case
revolves
around
procedures
used
rulemaking
hearing
commenced
february
supplemental
notice
hearing
commission
indicated
discovery
utilized
environmental
survey
available
public
hearing
along
extensive
background
documents
cited
therein
participants
given
reasonable
opportunity
present
position
represented
counsel
desired
written
time
permitting
oral
statements
received
incorporated
record
persons
giving
oral
statements
subject
questioning
commission
conclusion
hearing
transcript
made
available
public
record
remain
open
days
allow
filing
supplemental
written
statements
see
generally
individuals
organizations
representing
wide
variety
interests
submitted
written
comments
january
licensing
board
held
planning
session
schedule
appearance
witnesses
discuss
methods
compiling
record
hearing
held
february
participation
number
groups
including
commission
staff
environmental
protection
agency
manufacturer
reactor
equipment
trade
association
nuclear
industry
group
electric
utility
companies
group
called
consolidated
national
intervenors
represented
groups
individuals
including
respondent
nrdc
hearing
commission
staff
filed
supplemental
document
purpose
clarifying
revising
environmental
survey
licensing
board
forwarded
report
commission
without
rendering
decision
licensing
board
identified
principal
procedural
question
propriety
declining
use
full
formal
adjudicatory
procedures
major
substantive
issue
technical
adequacy
environmental
survey
april
commission
issued
rule
adopted
second
two
proposed
alternatives
described
commission
also
approved
procedures
used
hearing
indicated
record
including
environmental
survey
provided
adequate
data
base
regulation
adopted
finally
commission
ruled
extent
rule
differed
appeal
board
decisions
vermont
yankee
decisions
presidential
significance
since
environmental
effects
uranium
fuel
cycle
shown
relatively
insignificant
unnecessary
apply
amendment
applicant
environmental
reports
submitted
prior
effective
date
final
environmental
statements
draft
environmental
statements
circulated
comment
prior
effective
date
respondents
appealed
commission
adoption
rule
decision
grant
vermont
yankee
license
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
january
petitioner
consumers
power
applied
permit
construct
two
nuclear
reactors
midland
consumers
power
application
examined
commission
staff
acrs
acrs
issued
reports
discussed
specific
problems
recommended
solutions
also
made
reference
problems
generic
nature
suggested
efforts
made
resolve
respect
well
projects
two
groups
one
called
saginaw
another
called
mapleton
intervened
opposed
application
saginaw
filed
board
number
environmental
contentions
directed
interrogatories
acrs
attempted
depose
chairman
acrs
requested
discovery
various
acrs
documents
licensing
board
denied
various
discovery
requests
directed
acrs
hearings
held
numerous
radiological
health
safety
issues
thereafter
commission
staff
issued
draft
environmental
impact
statement
saginaw
submitted
environmental
contentions
comments
proposed
draft
statement
statement
saginaw
position
upcoming
hearings
staff
revised
statement
issued
final
environmental
statement
march
hearings
conducted
may
june
saginaw
however
choosing
appear
participate
latter
hearings
indicated
conventional
findings
fact
set
forth
chosen
search
record
respond
proceeding
submitting
citations
matters
believe
proved
disproved
see
app
licensing
board
recognizing
obligations
independently
consider
final
balance
among
conflicting
environmental
factors
record
nevertheless
treated
contested
issues
intervenors
introduced
affirmative
evidence
engaged
substantial
cross
examination
issue
contentions
claimed
raise
questions
energy
conservation
licensing
board
indicated
far
appeared
record
demand
plant
made
normal
industrial
residential
use
went
state
beyond
province
inquire
whether
customary
uses
made
electricity
society
proper
improper
ibid
respect
claims
consumers
power
stimulated
demand
advertising
licensing
board
indicated
evidence
offered
point
absent
evidence
applicant
creating
abnormal
demand
board
consider
question
licensing
board
also
failed
consider
environmental
effects
fuel
reprocessing
disposal
radioactive
wastes
appeal
board
ultimately
affirmed
licensing
board
grant
construction
permit
commission
declined
review
matter
time
council
environmental
quality
revised
regulations
governing
preparation
environmental
impact
statements
fed
reg
regulations
mentioned
first
time
necessity
considering
impact
statements
energy
conservation
one
alternatives
proposed
project
new
guidelines
apply
final
impact
statements
filed
january
thereafter
november
year
record
closed
consumers
power
case
case
pending
appeals
commission
ruled
another
case
statutory
power
compel
conservation
clear
follow
evidence
energy
conservation
issues
therefore
barred
threshold
niagara
mohawk
power
saginaw
moved
commission
clarify
ruling
reopen
consumers
power
proceedings
lengthy
opinion
commission
declined
reopen
proceedings
commission
first
ruled
required
consider
energy
conservation
alternatives
reasonably
available
aggregate
effect
curtail
demand
electricity
level
proposed
facility
needed
susceptible
reasonable
degree
proof
app
determined
thorough
examination
record
saginaw
contentions
met
threshold
tests
determined
board
willing
times
take
evidence
contentions
saginaw
simply
failed
present
evidence
commission
criticized
saginaw
total
disregard
even
minimal
procedural
formalities
necessary
give
board
idea
exactly
issue
commission
emphasized
articularly
circumstances
saginaw
complaint
granted
hearing
alleged
energy
conservation
issues
comes
ill
grace
response
saginaw
contention
regardless
whether
properly
raised
issues
licensing
board
must
consider
environmental
issues
commission
basically
agreed
board
reasoned
board
must
workable
procedural
rules
rules
setting
must
take
account
energy
conservation
novel
evolving
concept
nepa
require
crystal
ball
inquiry
natural
resources
defense
council
morton
app
consideration
led
us
hold
apply
niagara
retroactively
gain
experience
basis
hopefully
feasible
energy
conservation
techniques
emerge
applicant
staff
licensing
boards
obligations
develop
adequate
record
issues
appropriate
cases
whether
raised
intervenors
however
emergent
stage
energy
conservation
principles
intervenors
also
responsibilities
must
state
clear
reasonably
specific
energy
conservation
contentions
timely
fashion
beyond
burden
coming
forward
affirmative
showing
wish
novel
contentions
explored
footnotes
omitted
respect
challenge
vermont
yankee
license
first
ruled
absence
effective
rulemaking
proceedings
commission
must
deal
environmental
impact
fuel
reprocessing
disposal
individual
licensing
proceedings
app
examined
rulemaking
proceedings
despite
fact
appeared
agency
employed
procedures
required
ed
determined
proceedings
inadequate
overturned
rule
accordingly
commission
determination
respect
vermont
yankee
license
also
remanded
proceedings
app
respect
permit
consumers
power
first
held
environmental
impact
statement
construction
midland
reactors
fatally
defective
failure
examine
energy
conservation
alternative
plant
size
app
also
thought
report
acrs
inadequate
although
agree
discovery
individual
acrs
members
proper
way
obtain
explication
report
instead
held
commission
sua
sponte
sent
report
back
acrs
elucidation
problems
resolution
finally
ruled
fuel
cycle
issues
case
controlled
nrdc
nrc
discussed
remanded
appropriate
consideration
waste
disposal
unaddressed
fuel
cycle
issues
described
opinion
app
ii
petitioner
vermont
yankee
first
argues
commission
may
grant
license
operate
nuclear
reactor
without
consideration
waste
disposal
fuel
reprocessing
find
however
issue
longer
presented
record
case
commission
contend
required
consider
environmental
impact
spent
fuel
processes
licensing
nuclear
power
plants
indeed
commission
publicly
stated
subsequent
appeals
decision
instant
case
consideration
environmental
impact
back
end
fuel
cycle
environmental
impact
statements
individual
lwr
power
reactors
represent
full
candid
assessment
costs
benefits
consistent
legal
requirements
spirit
nepa
fed
reg
even
prior
appeals
decision
commission
implicitly
agreed
consider
back
end
fuel
cycle
licensing
proceedings
indicated
necessary
reopen
prior
licensing
proceedings
environmental
effects
uranium
fuel
cycle
shown
relatively
insignificant
thus
incorporation
effects
analysis
change
results
licensing
proceedings
app
thus
stage
proceedings
question
presented
review
regard
whether
commission
may
consider
environmental
impact
fuel
processes
licensing
nuclear
reactors
addition
weight
normally
attaches
agency
determination
question
reasons
support
commission
conclusion
vermont
yankee
produce
annually
well
pounds
radioactive
wastes
highly
toxic
commission
pamphlet
published
information
office
clearly
recognizes
wastes
pose
severe
potential
health
hazard
atomic
energy
commission
radioactive
wastes
many
substances
must
isolated
anywhere
hundreds
thousands
years
hard
argue
wastes
constitute
adverse
environmental
effects
avoided
proposal
implemented
operating
nuclear
power
plants
making
irreversible
irretrievable
commitments
resources
ii
appeals
recognized
environmental
impact
radioactive
wastes
produced
nuclear
power
plant
analytically
indistinguishable
environmental
effects
stack
gases
produced
power
plant
app
reasons
hold
commission
acted
well
within
statutory
authority
considered
back
end
fuel
cycle
individual
licensing
proceedings
next
turn
invalidation
fuel
cycle
rule
determining
whether
appeals
reached
permissible
result
must
determine
exactly
result
reach
case
mean
feat
vermont
yankee
argues
invalidated
rule
inadequacy
procedures
employed
proceedings
brief
petitioner
pp
respondents
hand
labeling
petitioner
view
decision
straw
man
argue
merely
held
record
inadequate
enable
reviewing
determine
whether
agency
fulfilled
statutory
obligation
brief
respondents
pp
unfortunately
found
parties
characterization
opinion
entirely
reliable
appears
orloff
willoughby
parties
changed
positions
nimbly
dancing
quadrille
thorough
examination
opinion
conclude
matter
entirely
free
doubt
majority
appeals
struck
rule
perceived
inadequacies
procedures
employed
rulemaking
proceedings
first
determined
intervenors
primary
argument
decision
preclude
discovery
denied
meaningful
opportunity
participate
proceedings
guaranteed
due
process
app
went
frame
issue
decision
thus
thus
called
upon
decide
whether
procedures
provided
agency
sufficient
ventilate
issues
prior
opinions
intimated
even
rulemaking
proceeding
agency
making
quasijudicial
determination
small
number
persons
exceptionally
affected
case
upon
individual
grounds
circumstances
additional
procedures
may
required
order
afford
aggrieved
individuals
due
process
florida
east
coast
quoting
investment
state
board
equalization
might
also
true
although
think
issue
presented
case
accordingly
decide
totally
unjustified
departure
agency
procedures
long
standing
might
require
judicial
correction
much
absolutely
clear
absent
constitutional
constraints
extremely
compelling
circumstances
administrative
agencies
free
fashion
rules
procedure
pursue
methods
inquiry
capable
permitting
discharge
multitudinous
duties
fcc
schreiber
quoting
fcc
pottsville
broadcasting
indeed
cases
hardly
explicit
regard
noted
fcc
schreiber
supra
upheld
principle
variety
applications
including
case
district
instead
inquiring
validity
federal
communications
commission
exercise
rulemaking
authority
devised
procedures
followed
agency
basis
conception
public
private
interest
involved
best
served
examining
communications
act
unanimously
held
appeals
erred
upholding
action
basic
reason
decision
appeals
serious
departure
basic
tenet
administrative
law
agencies
free
fashion
rules
procedure
continually
repeated
theme
years
recently
fpc
transcontinental
gas
pipe
line
decided
two
terms
ago
case
determining
proper
scope
judicial
review
agency
action
natural
gas
act
held
may
occasion
remand
agency
decision
inadequacy
record
agency
normally
allowed
exercise
administrative
discretion
deciding
light
internal
organization
considerations
may
best
proceed
develop
needed
evidence
prior
decision
modified
light
evidence
develops
went
emphasize
least
absence
substantial
justification
otherwise
reviewing
may
determining
additional
evidence
requisite
adequate
review
proceed
dictating
agency
methods
procedures
time
dimension
needed
inquiry
ordering
results
reported
without
opportunity
consideration
basis
new
evidence
agency
procedure
clearly
runs
risk
propel
ling
domain
congress
set
aside
exclusively
administrative
agency
sec
chenery
ibid
subsection
minimum
requirements
public
rule
making
procedure
short
statutory
hearing
agencies
might
addition
confer
industry
advisory
committees
consult
organizations
hold
informal
hearings
like
considerations
practicality
necessity
public
interest
naturally
govern
agency
determination
extent
public
proceedings
go
matters
great
import
public
submission
facts
either
useful
agency
protection
public
naturally
accorded
elaborate
public
procedures
niformity
found
possible
desirable
classes
equity
law
actions
courts
seem
require
argument
demonstrate
administrative
agencies
exercising
fraction
judicial
power
may
likewise
operate
uniform
rules
practice
procedure
may
required
remain
within
terms
law
exercise
power
bill
outline
minimum
essential
rights
procedures
affords
private
parties
means
knowing
rights
may
protect
bill
contains
essentials
different
forms
administrative
proceedings
compelling
reasons
construing
manner
first
place
courts
continually
review
agency
proceedings
determine
whether
agency
employed
procedures
opinion
perfectly
tailored
reach
perceives
best
correct
result
judicial
review
totally
unpredictable
agencies
operating
vague
injunction
employ
best
procedures
facing
threat
reversal
undoubtedly
adopt
full
adjudicatory
procedures
every
instance
totally
disrupt
statutory
scheme
congress
enacted
formula
upon
opposing
social
political
forces
come
rest
wong
yang
sung
mcgrath
inherent
advantages
informal
rulemaking
totally
lost
secondly
obvious
cases
reviewed
agency
choice
procedures
basis
record
actually
produced
hearing
app
basis
information
available
agency
made
decision
structure
proceedings
certain
way
sort
monday
morning
quarterbacking
encourages
almost
compels
agency
conduct
rulemaking
proceedings
full
panoply
procedural
devices
normally
associated
adjudicatory
hearings
finally
perhaps
importantly
sort
review
fundamentally
misconceives
nature
standard
judicial
review
agency
rule
uncritically
assumed
additional
procedures
automatically
result
adequate
record
give
interested
parties
opportunity
participate
contribute
proceedings
informal
rulemaking
need
based
solely
transcript
hearing
held
agency
indeed
agency
need
even
hold
formal
hearing
see
thus
adequacy
record
type
proceeding
correlated
directly
type
procedural
devices
employed
rather
turns
whether
agency
followed
statutory
mandate
administrative
procedure
act
relevant
statutes
agency
compelled
support
rule
ultimately
adopts
type
record
produced
full
adjudicatory
hearing
simply
choice
conduct
full
adjudicatory
hearing
prior
promulgating
every
rule
sum
sort
unwarranted
judicial
examination
perceived
procedural
shortcomings
rulemaking
proceeding
nothing
seriously
interfere
process
prescribed
congress
respondent
nrdc
also
argues
fact
commission
inquiry
undertaken
context
nepa
somehow
permits
require
procedures
beyond
specified
apa
investigating
factual
issues
rulemaking
appeals
apparently
also
view
indicating
agencies
may
required
develop
new
procedures
accomplish
innovative
task
implementing
nepa
rulemaking
app
search
vain
something
nepa
mandate
result
observed
nepa
repeal
implication
statute
aberdeen
rockfish
scrap
see
also
scrap
fact
two
terms
ago
emphasized
procedural
requirements
imposed
nepa
stated
plain
language
act
kleppe
sierra
club
thus
clear
nepa
serve
basis
substantial
revision
carefully
constructed
procedural
specifications
apa
short
nothing
apa
nepa
circumstances
case
nature
issues
considered
past
agency
practice
statutory
mandate
commission
operates
permitted
review
overturn
rulemaking
proceeding
basis
procedural
devices
employed
employed
commission
long
commission
employed
least
statutory
minima
matter
doubt
case
remains
course
question
whether
challenged
rule
finds
sufficient
justification
administrative
proceedings
upheld
reviewing
judge
tamm
concurring
result
reached
majority
appeals
thought
also
intimations
majority
opinion
suggest
judges
joined
likewise
may
thought
administrative
proceedings
insufficient
basis
upon
predicate
rule
question
accordingly
remand
appeals
may
review
rule
administrative
procedure
act
provides
made
abundantly
clear
contemporaneous
explanation
agency
decision
validity
action
must
stand
fall
propriety
finding
judged
course
appropriate
standard
review
finding
sustainable
administrative
record
made
comptroller
decision
must
vacated
matter
remanded
consideration
camp
pitts
see
also
sec
chenery
engage
kind
review
stray
beyond
judicial
province
explore
procedural
format
impose
upon
agency
notion
procedures
best
likely
vague
undefined
public
good
iii
turn
appeals
holding
rejection
energy
conservation
basis
threshold
test
capricious
arbitrary
app
conclude
wrong
appeals
ruled
commission
threshold
test
presentation
energy
conservation
contentions
inconsistent
nepa
basic
mandate
commission
commission
reasoned
something
umpire
sits
back
resolves
adversary
contentions
hearing
stage
intervenor
comments
bring
sufficient
attention
issue
stimulate
commission
consideration
commission
must
undertake
preliminary
investigation
proffered
alternative
sufficient
reach
rational
judgment
whether
worthy
detailed
consideration
eis
moreover
commission
must
explain
basis
conclusion
consideration
suggested
alternative
unwarranted
quoting
indiana
michigan
electric
fpc
app
cert
denied
rationale
entirely
unappealing
abstract
proposition
applied
case
think
basically
misconceives
scope
agency
statutory
responsibility
also
nature
administrative
process
thrust
agency
decision
type
issues
intervenors
trying
raise
little
doubt
atomic
energy
act
state
public
utility
commissions
similar
bodies
empowered
make
initial
decision
regarding
need
power
commission
prime
area
concern
licensing
context
hand
national
security
public
health
safety
clear
need
term
conventionally
used
power
thoroughly
explored
hearings
even
federal
power
commission
regulates
sales
interstate
commerce
et
seq
ed
agreed
consumers
power
analysis
projected
need
app
nepa
course
altered
slightly
statutory
balance
requiring
detailed
statement
responsible
official
alternatives
proposed
action
obvious
even
upon
moment
reflection
term
alternatives
make
impact
statement
something
exercise
frivolous
boilerplate
concept
alternatives
must
bounded
notion
feasibility
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
recognized
reason
concluding
nepa
meant
require
detailed
discussion
environmental
effects
alternatives
put
forward
comments
effects
readily
ascertained
alternatives
deemed
remote
speculative
possibilities
view
basic
changes
required
statutes
policies
agencies
making
available
protracted
debate
litigation
meaningfully
compatible
needs
underlying
proposal
addressed
natural
resources
defense
council
morton
app
principles
mind
turn
notion
energy
conservation
alternative
omission
thought
appeals
forcefully
pointed
saginaw
comments
draft
eis
app
commission
pointed
phrase
energy
conservation
deceptively
simple
ring
context
taken
literally
phrase
suggests
virtually
limitless
range
possible
actions
developments
might
one
way
another
ultimately
reduce
projected
demands
electricity
particular
proposed
plant
app
moreover
practical
matter
hard
dispute
observation
largely
events
recent
years
emphasized
need
also
large
variety
alternatives
energy
conservation
prior
drastic
oil
shortages
incurred
little
serious
thought
government
circles
energy
conservation
alternatives
indeed
council
environmental
quality
promulgate
regulations
even
remotely
suggested
need
consider
energy
conservation
impact
statements
august
see
cfr
fed
reg
even
guidelines
made
applicable
draft
final
statements
filed
council
january
federal
power
commission
likewise
require
consideration
energy
conservation
applications
build
hydroelectric
facilities
june
cfr
pt
app
fed
reg
regulations
made
retroactive
either
occurred
year
half
draft
environmental
statement
midland
prepared
year
final
environmental
statement
prepared
hearings
completed
think
facts
amply
demonstrate
concept
alternatives
evolving
one
requiring
agency
explore
fewer
alternatives
become
better
known
understood
well
understood
commission
unlike
appeals
recognized
licensing
board
decision
judged
information
available
judged
light
little
doubt
board
actions
well
within
proper
bounds
statutory
authority
record
agency
give
every
indication
project
actually
needed
also
nothing
board
indicate
contrary
also
think
criticism
commission
threshold
test
displays
lack
understanding
historical
setting
within
agency
action
took
place
nature
test
first
place
true
nepa
places
upon
agency
obligation
consider
every
significant
aspect
environmental
impact
proposed
action
still
incumbent
upon
intervenors
wish
participate
structure
participation
meaningful
alerts
agency
intervenors
position
contentions
especially
true
intervenors
requesting
agency
embark
upon
exploration
uncharted
territory
question
energy
conservation
late
early
omments
must
significant
enough
step
threshold
requirement
materiality
lack
agency
response
consideration
becomes
concern
comment
merely
state
particular
mistake
made
must
show
mistake
possible
significance
results
portland
cement
assn
ruckelshaus
app
cert
denied
sub
nom
portland
cement
administrator
epa
also
think
seriously
mischaracterized
commission
threshold
test
placing
heavy
substantive
burdens
intervenors
app
contrary
commission
explicitly
stated
equate
burden
civil
litigation
concept
prima
facie
case
unduly
heavy
burden
setting
showing
sufficient
require
reasonable
minds
inquire
app
sum
characterize
actions
commission
arbitrary
capricious
light
facts
available
described
length
deprive
words
meaning
said
past
administrative
consideration
evidence
always
creates
gap
time
record
closed
time
administrative
decision
promulgated
might
add
time
decision
judicially
reviewed
upon
coming
order
litigants
might
demand
rehearings
matter
law
new
circumstance
arisen
new
trend
observed
new
fact
discovered
little
hope
administrative
process
ever
consummated
order
subject
reopening
icc
jersey
city
also
made
clear
role
reviewing
sufficiency
agency
consideration
environmental
factors
limited
one
limited
time
decision
made
statute
mandating
review
neither
statute
legislative
history
contemplates
substitute
judgment
agency
environmental
consequences
actions
kleppe
sierra
club
finally
turn
appeals
holding
licensing
board
returned
acrs
report
acrs
elaboration
understandable
layman
reference
problems
appeals
reasoned
since
one
function
report
concerned
may
apprised
safety
possible
hazard
facilities
report
must
terms
understandable
layman
replete
previous
reports
problems
detailed
report
elaborate
licensing
board
fails
sua
sponte
return
report
acrs
development
entire
agency
action
made
exhaustive
studies
reviews
days
hearings
must
nullified
appeals
unjustifiably
intruded
administrative
process
true
congress
thought
publication
acrs
report
served
important
function
legislative
history
shows
function
publication
subsidiary
main
function
providing
technical
advice
body
experts
uniquely
qualified
provide
assistance
see
joint
committee
atomic
energy
study
aec
procedures
organization
licensing
reactor
facilities
comm
print
basic
information
conveyed
public
necessarily
full
technical
exposition
every
facet
nuclear
energy
rather
acrs
position
reasons
therefore
respect
safety
proposed
nuclear
reactor
accordingly
acrs
faulted
dealing
every
facet
nuclear
energy
every
report
issues
equal
significance
fact
acrs
obfuscating
findings
reports
referred
matters
public
record
file
commission
room
indeed
acrs
reports
file
furthermore
informed
shortly
licensing
board
initial
decision
acrs
prepared
list
identified
generic
safety
concerns
light
simply
inconceivable
reviewing
find
necessary
permissible
order
board
sua
sponte
return
report
acrs
view
confirmed
fact
putative
reason
remand
public
understand
report
yet
one
member
supposedly
uncomprehending
public
even
asked
report
remanded
surely
petitioner
consumers
power
claims
judicial
intervention
run
riot
brief
petitioner
also
think
worth
noting
find
absolutely
nothing
relevant
statutes
justify
commission
well
might
able
remand
report
clarification
nothing
support
ordering
commission
take
step
support
requiring
acrs
give
short
explanation
understandable
layman
generic
safety
concern
leads
us
make
one
observation
relevance
case
say
appeals
final
reason
remanding
insubstantial
best
gross
understatement
consumers
power
first
applied
construction
permit
even
operating
license
construction
permit
proposed
plant
underwent
incredibly
extensive
review
reports
filed
reviewed
literally
fill
books
proceedings
took
years
actual
hearings
two
weeks
nullify
effort
seven
years
later
one
report
refers
problems
problems
admittedly
discussed
length
reports
available
public
borders
kafkaesque
nuclear
energy
may
day
cheap
safe
source
power
may
congress
made
choice
least
try
nuclear
energy
establishing
reasonable
review
process
courts
play
limited
role
fundamental
policy
questions
appropriately
resolved
congress
state
legislatures
subject
federal
courts
guise
judicial
review
agency
action
time
may
prove
wrong
decision
develop
nuclear
energy
congress
within
appropriate
agencies
must
eventually
make
judgment
meantime
courts
perform
appointed
function
nepa
set
forth
significant
substantive
goals
nation
mandate
agencies
essentially
procedural
see
see
also
aberdeen
rockfish
scrap
insure
fully
informed
decision
necessarily
decision
judges
appeals
reached
members
decisionmaking
unit
agency
administrative
decisions
set
aside
context
every
substantial
procedural
substantive
reasons
mandated
statute
consolo
fmc
simply
unhappy
result
reached
single
alleged
oversight
peripheral
issue
urged
parties
never
fully
cooperated
indeed
raised
issue
must
made
basis
overturning
decision
properly
made
otherwise
exhaustive
proceeding
reversed
remanded
footnotes
licensing
regulatory
functions
atomic
energy
commission
aec
transferred
nuclear
regulatory
commission
nrc
energy
reorganization
act
et
seq
supp
hereinafter
aec
nrc
referred
commission
acrs
required
review
construction
permit
application
purpose
informing
commission
hazards
proposed
existing
reactor
facilities
adequacy
proposed
reactor
safety
standards
licensing
board
issues
permit
concludes
reasonable
assurance
proposed
plant
constructed
operated
without
undue
risk
cfr
environmental
balance
favors
issuance
permit
license
application
contested
licensing
board
must
find
reasonable
assurance
plant
operated
without
undue
risk
inimical
common
defense
security
health
safety
public
see
cfr
licensing
board
decision
subject
review
similar
afforded
board
decision
respect
construction
permit
nuclear
fission
takes
place
nuclear
reactors
apparently
converts
principal
fuel
uranium
plutonium
highly
radioactive
used
reactor
fuel
separated
remaining
uranium
radioactive
waste
products
fuel
reprocessing
refers
process
necessary
recapture
usable
plutonium
waste
disposal
present
stage
technological
development
refers
storage
long
lived
highly
radioactive
waste
products
detoxify
sufficiently
longer
present
environmental
hazard
presently
physical
chemical
steps
render
waste
less
toxic
simply
passage
time
commission
stated
view
procedures
adopted
provide
adequate
basis
formulation
rule
adopted
parties
fully
heard
nothing
offered
excluded
record
indicate
evidentiary
material
received
different
procedures
proponent
strict
adjudicatory
approach
make
offer
proof
even
remotely
suggest
substantive
matters
develop
different
procedures
addition
note
documents
including
survey
available
parties
several
weeks
hearing
regulatory
staff
though
requested
made
available
various
drafts
handwritten
notes
circumstances
conclude
adjudicatory
type
procedures
warranted
app
omitted
acrs
report
quoted
app
stated
problems
related
large
water
reactors
identified
regulatory
staff
acrs
cited
previous
acrs
reports
committee
believes
resolution
items
apply
equally
midland
plant
units
committee
believes
items
resolved
construction
due
consideration
given
items
nuclear
units
proposed
midland
plant
constructed
reasonable
assurance
operated
without
undue
risk
health
safety
public
saginaw
included
saginaw
valley
nuclear
study
group
citizens
committee
environmental
protection
michigan
automobile
workers
international
three
environmental
groups
mapleton
included
nelson
aeschliman
five
residents
community
near
proposed
plantsite
mapleton
raise
contentions
relating
energy
conservation
pursuant
regulations
effect
licensing
board
refused
consider
environmental
issues
first
set
hearings
last
day
hearings
however
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
decided
calvert
cliffs
coordinating
comm
aec
app
invalidated
commission
nepa
regulations
one
effect
decision
require
environmental
matters
considered
pending
proceedings
including
one
accordingly
commission
revised
regulations
undertook
extensive
environmental
review
proposed
nuclear
plants
requiring
consumers
power
file
lengthy
environmental
report
thereafter
commission
staff
prepared
draft
environmental
impact
statement
discussed
text
licensing
board
highlighted
problem
initial
decision
noting
failure
propose
proper
findings
conclusions
greatly
complicated
task
board
made
virtually
impossible
instances
know
whether
particular
issues
fact
contested
app
appeal
board
even
less
charitable
noting
articipation
manner
opinion
subverts
entire
adjudicatory
process
essentially
dictum
commission
also
ruled
considering
various
relevant
factors
extent
new
rule
represents
departure
prior
practice
degree
reliance
past
practice
consequent
burdens
imposed
retroactive
application
rule
rule
enunciated
niagara
applied
retroactively
cases
progressed
final
order
issuance
construction
permits
niagara
decided
app
appeals
one
questioned
commission
authority
deal
fuel
cycle
issues
informal
rulemaking
opposed
adjudication
app
neither
anyone
seriously
question
commission
authority
respect
decision
appeals
commission
promulgated
new
interim
rule
pending
issuance
final
rule
fed
reg
see
vermont
yankee
nuclear
power
commission
request
new
england
coalition
nuclear
pollution
applied
interim
rule
vermont
yankee
determined
analysis
still
plant
favor
vermont
yankee
nuclear
power
decision
presently
appeal
appeals
first
circuit
commission
also
indicated
brief
intends
complete
proceedings
currently
progress
looking
toward
adoption
final
rule
regardless
outcome
case
brief
federal
respondents
following
oral
argument
respondent
nrdc
relying
facts
filed
suggestion
mootness
motion
dismiss
writ
certiorari
improvidently
granted
hold
case
moot
deny
motion
dismiss
writ
certiorari
improvidently
granted
upon
remand
majority
panel
appeals
entirely
free
agree
disagree
judge
tamm
conclusion
rule
pertaining
back
end
fuel
cycle
petitioner
vermont
yankee
license
considered
arbitrary
capricious
within
meaning
administrative
procedure
act
ed
even
though
may
hold
previous
opinion
rule
invalid
inadequacy
agency
procedures
hold
rule
invalid
appears
probability
commission
proceed
promulgate
rule
resulting
rulemaking
proceedings
currently
progress
brief
federal
respondents
likelihood
commission
required
compulsion
order
examine
vermont
yankee
license
new
rule
hand
majority
appeals
decide
unwilling
hold
rule
question
arbitrary
capricious
merely
basis
administrative
procedure
act
vermont
yankee
necessarily
required
license
reevaluated
far
petitioner
vermont
yankee
concerned
certainly
case
controversy
respect
whether
must
virtue
appeals
decision
submit
license
commission
reevaluation
possible
revocation
new
rule
true
finally
determine
validity
rule
upon
validity
vermont
yankee
license
turn
depends
neither
anything
say
today
taken
limitation
appeals
discretion
take
due
account
appropriate
additions
made
record
commission
consolidate
appeal
appeal
interim
rulemaking
proceeding
already
pending
fact
question
validity
first
rule
remains
open
upon
remand
makes
controversy
less
live
read
opinion
appeals
view
reviewing
courts
may
absence
special
circumstances
justifying
course
action
impose
additional
procedural
requirements
agency
action
raises
questions
significance
area
law
warrant
granting
certiorari
deciding
case
since
vast
majority
challenges
administrative
agency
action
brought
appeals
district
columbia
circuit
decision
case
serve
precedent
many
proceedings
judicial
review
agency
actions
decision
another
appeals
finally
decision
continue
play
major
role
instant
litigation
regardless
commission
decision
press
ahead
rulemaking
proceedings
note
infra
nrdc
relying
decision
appeals
device
force
agency
provide
procedures
also
challenging
interim
rules
promulgated
agency
appeals
alleging
inadequacy
procedures
citing
opinion
appeals
binding
precedent
effect
vermont
yankee
interpretation
consistent
throughout
litigation
said
parties
however
government
initially
took
positions
petition
certiorari
pending
brief
filed
behalf
commission
former
indicating
believed
unanimously
held
record
inadequate
latter
took
vermont
yankee
view
matter
see
brief
federal
respondents
filed
announcing
intention
undertake
licensing
reactors
pending
promulgation
interim
fuel
cycle
rule
however
commission
said
found
rule
inadequately
supported
record
insofar
treated
two
particular
aspects
fuel
cycle
impacts
reprocessing
spent
fuel
impacts
radioactive
waste
management
fed
reg
even
recently
opening
another
rulemaking
proceeding
replace
rule
overturned
appeals
commission
stated
original
procedures
proved
adequate
development
illumination
wide
range
fuel
cycle
impact
issues
indicated
procedures
previously
employed
suffice
indeed
issues
accordingly
notice
hereby
given
rules
conduct
reopened
hearing
authorities
responsibilities
hearing
board
originally
applied
matter
fed
reg
january
except
specific
provision
hereby
made
hearing
board
entertain
suggestions
participants
questions
board
ask
witnesses
participants
fed
reg
respondent
nrdc
likewise
happily
switches
sides
depending
forum
indicated
argues
appeals
held
record
inadequate
almost
immediately
appeals
rendered
decision
however
nrdc
filed
petition
rulemaking
commission
listed
pages
procedural
suggestions
thought
necessary
comply
order
mandate
nepa
nrdc
petition
rulemaking
nrc
docket
proposals
include
discovery
subpoena
power
attachment
rules
conduct
hearing
environmental
effects
uranium
fuel
cycle
nrdc
likewise
challenged
interim
fuel
cycle
rule
suggested
appeals
hold
case
pending
decision
case
interim
rules
defective
due
inadequacy
procedures
used
developing
rule
motion
hold
petition
review
abeyance
nrdc
nrc
dc
petition
review
filed
may
motion
filed
july
nrdc
likewise
challenged
procedures
used
final
rulemaking
proceeding
hearing
procedures
found
inadequate
appeals
nrdc
petition
reconsideration
ruling
reopening
hearings
environmental
effects
uranium
fuel
cycle
nrc
docket
june
respondent
nrdc
argue
additional
procedural
devices
required
constitution
since
clearly
rulemaking
proceeding
purest
form
see
nothing
support
view
see
florida
east
coast
bowles
willingham
investment
state
board
equalization
nrdc
argues
agency
past
provided
minimum
procedures
specified
apa
therefore
something
required
since
gencies
free
alter
procedures
whim
grossly
constricting
parties
procedural
rights
deems
impediment
embarrassment
implementing
views
brief
respondents
support
nrdc
first
argues
commission
considered
equally
generic
issues
adjudicatory
proceedings
nrdc
conceded
agency
promulgate
rules
regarding
fuel
cycle
rulemaking
proceedings
app
moreover
even
concedes
commission
past
chosen
consider
environmental
safety
issues
ordinarily
addressed
adjudicatory
licensing
proceedings
generic
rulemaking
practice
lower
take
issue
brief
respondents
contends
however
commission
provided
procedural
safeguards
rulemaking
proceedings
proceeding
presently
review
support
cites
three
previous
proceedings
supposedly
provided
pretermitting
fact
appeals
way
relied
upon
argument
decision
question
whether
courts
impose
additional
procedures
even
agency
substantially
departs
past
practice
find
nrdc
argument
without
merit
first
place
three
proceedings
many
held
nrc
predecessor
hardly
establish
type
longstanding
practice
deviation
might
justify
judicial
intervention
appears
moreover
fact
hearings
cited
nrdc
part
longstanding
practice
aberrational
since
commission
conducted
large
number
rulemaking
proceedings
involved
matters
substantial
importance
almost
none
involved
see
quality
assurance
criteria
nuclear
power
plants
fed
reg
general
design
criteria
nuclear
power
plants
fed
reg
permit
activities
fed
reg
environmental
protection
licensing
regulatory
policy
procedures
see
cab
hermann
oklahoma
press
pub
walling
wallace
nlrb
endicott
johnson
perkins
utah
fuel
national
bituminous
coal
norwegian
nitrogen
products
see
power
reactor
electricians
zucca
see
wright
courts
rulemaking
process
limits
judicial
review
cornell
rev
course
must
determine
whether
agency
complied
procedures
mandated
relevant
statutes
citizens
preserve
overton
park
volpe
indicated
little
doubt
agency
full
compliance
applicable
requirements
administrative
procedure
act
also
indicated
end
opinion
aeschliman
since
matter
requires
remand
reopening
issues
energy
conservation
alternatives
well
recalculation
costs
benefits
assume
commission
take
account
changed
circumstances
regarding
dow
principal
customer
plant
steam
need
process
steam
intended
continued
operation
dow
generating
facilities
app
read
appeals
opinion
however
independent
basis
vacating
remanding
commission
licensing
decision
also
appears
record
commission
reconsidered
changed
circumstances
refused
reopen
proceedings
least
three
times
see
app
possibly
fourth
see
brief
nonfederal
respondents
pp
see
error
commission
actions
respect