huffman
pursue
argued
december
decided
march
ohio
public
nuisance
statute
provides
inter
alia
place
exhibiting
obscene
films
nuisance
requires
year
closure
place
determined
nuisance
also
provides
sale
personalty
used
conducting
nuisance
appellant
officials
instituted
proceeding
statute
state
appellee
predecessor
operator
theater
displaying
pornographic
films
concluding
defendant
displayed
obscene
movies
trial
rendered
judgment
appellants
favor
ordered
theater
closed
year
seizure
sale
personal
property
used
operation
appellee
taken
operation
theater
prior
judgment
rather
appealing
within
state
system
immediately
filed
suit
federal
district
alleging
appellants
use
nuisance
statute
constituted
deprivation
constitutional
rights
color
state
law
seeking
injunctive
declaratory
relief
without
considering
whether
stayed
hand
deference
federalism
principles
set
forth
younger
harris
district
declared
nuisance
statute
unconstitutional
first
amendment
grounds
enjoined
execution
state
judgment
insofar
closed
theater
films
adjudged
obscene
prior
adversary
hearings
held
circumstances
principles
younger
applicable
even
though
state
proceeding
civil
nature
district
applied
tests
laid
younger
determining
whether
proceed
merits
entertained
action
unless
appellee
established
early
intervention
justified
exceptions
recognized
younger
state
proceeding
conducted
intent
harass
bad
faith
challenged
statute
flagrantly
patently
unconstitutional
pp
component
younger
rests
upon
threat
federal
system
federal
judicial
interference
state
criminal
proceedings
permitted
applies
equally
civil
proceeding
akin
criminal
prosecution
civil
cases
pp
apart
right
appellee
might
appeal
remained
state
view
comity
federalism
interests
younger
seeks
protect
permitted
luxury
federal
litigation
issues
presented
ongoing
state
proceedings
even
assuming
arguendo
litigants
entitled
federal
forum
resolution
federal
issues
entitlement
appropriately
asserted
state
litigant
seeks
relitigate
federal
issue
adversely
determined
completed
state
proceedings
pp
regardless
state
trial
judgment
became
final
younger
standards
must
met
justify
federal
intervention
state
judicial
proceeding
losing
litigant
exhausted
state
appellate
remedies
seeking
relief
federal
district
considerations
comity
federalism
underlie
younger
permit
truncation
exhaustion
requirement
merely
losing
party
state
general
jurisdiction
believes
appellee
chances
prevailing
appeal
auspicious
pp
since
district
rule
younger
issue
case
appropriate
remand
may
consider
whether
irreparable
injury
shown
light
intervening
ohio
decision
whether
injury
nature
district
may
assume
jurisdiction
exception
policy
federal
judicial
interference
state
proceedings
kind
pp
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
white
blackmun
powell
joined
douglas
filed
dissenting
statement
post
brennan
filed
dissenting
opinion
douglas
marshall
joined
post
james
clancy
argued
cause
appellants
brief
lawrence
huffman
pro
se
richard
bertsch
albert
johnston
iii
gilbert
deitch
argued
cause
appellee
brief
robert
eugene
smith
barbara
scott
james
bouras
filed
brief
motion
picture
association
america
amicus
curiae
urging
affirmance
justice
rehnquist
delivered
opinion
case
requires
decide
whether
decision
younger
harris
bars
federal
district
intervening
state
civil
proceeding
proceeding
based
state
statute
believed
district
unconstitutional
similar
issue
raised
gibson
berryhill
required
decide
enjoined
state
proceedings
biased
administrative
body
provide
necessary
predicate
younger
dismissal
opportunity
raise
timely
decided
competent
state
tribunal
federal
issues
involved
similarly
speight
slaton
noted
probable
jurisdiction
consider
applicability
younger
noncriminal
cases
remanded
reconsideration
light
subsequent
decision
georgia
struck
challenged
statute
similar
facts
today
reach
issue
conclude
circumstances
presented
principles
younger
applicable
even
though
state
proceeding
civil
nature
appellants
sheriff
prosecuting
attorney
allen
county
ohio
case
arises
efforts
close
cinema
theatre
lima
ohio
management
current
tenant
appellee
pursue
appellee
predecessor
william
dakota
cinema
specialized
display
films
may
fairly
characterized
pornographic
numerous
instances
adjudged
obscene
adversary
hearings
appellants
sought
invoke
ohio
public
nuisance
statute
ohio
rev
code
ann
et
seq
appellee
section
provides
place
exhibits
obscene
films
nuisance
requires
closure
year
place
determined
nuisance
statute
also
provides
preliminary
injunctions
pending
final
determination
status
nuisance
sale
personal
property
used
conducting
nuisance
release
closure
order
upon
satisfaction
certain
conditions
including
showing
nuisance
appellants
instituted
nuisance
proceeding
common
pleas
allen
county
appellee
predecessor
william
dakota
course
somewhat
involved
legal
proceedings
followed
common
pleas
reviewed
movies
shown
theater
rendered
judgment
dakota
engaged
course
conduct
displaying
obscene
movies
cinema
theater
therefore
closed
pursuant
ohio
rev
code
ann
purpose
period
one
year
unless
sooner
released
order
pursuant
fulfilling
requirements
provided
section
revised
code
ohio
judgment
also
provided
seizure
sale
personal
property
used
theater
operations
appellee
pursue
succeeded
william
dakota
leasehold
interest
cinema
prior
entry
judgment
rather
appealing
judgment
within
ohio
system
immediately
filed
suit
district
northern
district
ohio
complaint
based
alleged
appellants
use
ohio
nuisance
statute
constituted
deprivation
constitutional
rights
color
state
law
sought
injunctive
relief
declaratory
judgment
statute
unconstitutional
unenforceable
since
complaint
directed
constitutionality
state
statute
convened
district
concluded
statute
vague
constitute
overly
broad
prior
restraint
first
amendment
rights
insofar
permanently
temporarily
prevented
showing
films
adjudged
obscene
prior
adversary
hearings
cf
near
minnesota
ex
rel
olson
fashioning
remedy
match
perceived
constitutional
defect
permanently
enjoined
execution
portion
state
judgment
closed
cinema
films
adjudged
obscene
judgment
opinion
district
give
indication
considered
whether
stayed
hand
deference
principles
federalism
find
expression
younger
harris
appeal
appellants
raise
younger
problem
well
variety
constitutional
statutory
issues
need
consider
applicability
younger
ii
younger
companion
cases
considered
propriety
intervention
pending
state
criminal
prosecutions
issue
novel
one
relied
heavily
fenner
boykin
subsequent
cases
endorsed
holding
federal
injunctions
state
criminal
law
enforcement
process
issued
extraordinary
circumstances
danger
irreparable
loss
great
immediate
younger
involved
challenge
prosecution
california
criminal
syndicalism
act
allegedly
unconstitutional
face
opinion
justice
black
observed
perfectly
natural
cases
repeat
time
time
normal
thing
federal
courts
asked
enjoin
pending
proceedings
state
courts
issue
injunctions
noted
congressional
statute
manifested
interest
permitting
state
courts
try
state
cases
also
long
existed
strong
judicial
policy
federal
interference
state
criminal
proceedings
recognized
judicial
policy
based
part
traditional
doctrine
equity
stay
hand
movant
adequate
remedy
law
particularly
act
restrain
criminal
prosecution
went
explain
doctrine
reinforced
even
vital
consideration
aspect
federalism
described
notion
comity
proper
respect
state
functions
recognition
fact
entire
country
made
union
separate
state
governments
continuance
belief
national
government
fare
best
institutions
left
free
perform
separate
functions
separate
ways
national
government
anxious
though
may
vindicate
protect
federal
rights
federal
interests
always
endeavors
ways
unduly
interfere
legitimate
activities
ibid
younger
also
considered
whether
policy
noninterference
modified
decision
dombrowski
pfister
least
insofar
first
amendment
attacks
statutes
thought
facially
invalid
concerned
observed
arrests
threatened
prosecutions
dombrowski
alleged
bad
faith
employed
means
harassing
plaintiffs
case
thus
within
traditional
narrow
exceptions
doctrine
federal
courts
interfere
state
prosecutions
acknowledged
younger
course
conceivable
statute
might
flagrantly
patently
violative
express
constitutional
prohibitions
every
clause
sentence
paragraph
whatever
manner
whomever
effort
might
made
apply
situation
might
justify
federal
intervention
unequivocally
held
facial
invalidity
statute
exceptional
circumstance
justifying
federal
interference
state
criminal
proceedings
steffel
thompson
considered
whether
younger
required
exceptional
circumstances
justify
federal
declaratory
relief
state
criminal
statutes
prosecution
pending
concluding
occasion
identify
specifically
means
federal
interference
state
proceedings
might
violate
principles
comity
federalism
younger
based
noted
relevant
principles
equity
comity
federalism
little
force
absence
pending
state
proceeding
explained
state
criminal
proceeding
pending
time
federal
complaint
filed
federal
intervention
result
duplicative
legal
proceedings
disruption
state
criminal
justice
system
federal
intervention
circumstance
interpreted
reflecting
negatively
upon
state
ability
enforce
constitutional
principles
ibid
iii
seriousness
federal
judicial
interference
state
civil
functions
long
recognized
consistently
required
federal
courts
confronted
requests
relief
abide
standards
restraint
go
well
beyond
private
equity
jurisprudence
example
massachusetts
state
grange
benton
involved
effort
enjoin
operation
state
daylight
savings
act
writing
justice
holmes
cited
fenner
boykin
supra
emphasized
rule
strictly
observed
injunction
issue
officers
state
clothed
authority
enforce
law
question
unless
case
reasonably
free
doubt
necessary
prevent
great
irreparable
injury
although
justice
holmes
confronted
bill
seeking
injunction
state
executive
officers
rather
state
judicial
proceedings
think
relevant
considerations
federalism
less
weight
latter
setting
anything
counsel
heavily
toward
federal
restraint
since
interference
state
judicial
proceeding
prevents
state
effectuating
substantive
policies
also
continuing
perform
separate
function
providing
forum
competent
vindicate
constitutional
objections
interposed
policies
interference
also
results
duplicative
legal
proceedings
readily
interpreted
reflecting
negatively
upon
state
ability
enforce
constitutional
principles
cf
steffel
thompson
supra
component
younger
rests
upon
threat
federal
system
thus
applicable
civil
proceeding
quite
much
criminal
proceeding
younger
however
also
rests
upon
traditional
reluctance
courts
equity
even
within
unitary
system
interfere
criminal
prosecution
strictly
speaking
element
younger
available
mandate
federal
restraint
civil
cases
whatever
may
weight
attached
factor
civil
litigation
involving
private
parties
deal
state
proceeding
important
respects
akin
criminal
prosecution
civil
cases
state
party
common
pleas
proceeding
proceeding
aid
closely
related
criminal
statutes
prohibit
dissemination
obscene
materials
thus
offense
state
interest
nuisance
litigation
likely
every
bit
great
criminal
proceeding
cf
younger
harris
stewart
concurring
similarly
case
district
injunction
directly
disrupted
ohio
criminal
justice
system
disrupted
state
efforts
protect
interests
underlie
criminal
laws
obtain
compliance
precisely
standards
embodied
criminal
laws
iv
spite
critical
similarities
criminal
prosecution
ohio
nuisance
proceedings
appellee
nonetheless
urges
also
critical
difference
two
cause
us
limit
younger
criminal
proceedings
difference
says
appellee
whereas
criminal
defendant
may
exhaustion
state
remedies
present
constitutional
claims
federal
courts
habeas
corpus
analogous
remedy
available
one
like
appellee
whose
constitutional
rights
may
infringed
state
proceeding
result
custodial
detention
criminal
sanction
civil
litigant
may
course
seek
review
federal
claim
properly
asserted
rejected
state
courts
moreover
final
decision
state
sustained
validity
state
statute
challenged
federal
constitutional
grounds
appeal
lies
matter
right
thus
appellee
case
assured
eventual
consideration
claim
quite
apart
appellee
right
appeal
remained
state
conclude
permitted
luxury
federal
litigation
issues
presented
ongoing
state
proceedings
luxury
already
explained
quite
costly
terms
interests
younger
seeks
protect
appellee
argument
may
civil
counterpart
federal
habeas
contemporaneous
access
federal
forum
federal
claim
apparently
depends
unarticulated
major
premise
every
litigant
asserts
federal
claim
entitled
decided
merits
federal
rather
state
need
consider
validity
premise
order
reject
result
appellee
seeks
even
assuming
arguendo
litigants
entitled
federal
forum
resolution
federal
issues
entitlement
appropriately
asserted
state
litigant
seeks
relitigate
federal
issue
adversely
determined
completed
state
proceedings
understand
federal
forum
must
available
prior
completion
state
proceedings
federal
issue
arises
considerations
canvassed
younger
militate
result
issue
whether
federal
courts
able
interfere
ongoing
state
proceedings
quite
distinct
separate
issue
whether
litigants
entitled
subsequent
federal
review
dispositions
federal
questions
younger
turned
considerations
comity
federalism
peculiar
fact
state
proceedings
pending
turn
fact
event
criminal
defendant
eventually
obtained
federal
habeas
consideration
federal
claims
propriety
interference
ohio
nuisance
proceeding
must
likewise
controlled
application
considerations
comity
federalism
informed
relevant
principles
comity
federalism
least
three
courts
appeals
applied
younger
pending
state
proceedings
civil
nature
see
duke
texas
lynch
snepp
cousins
wigoda
purposes
case
us
however
need
make
general
pronouncements
upon
applicability
younger
civil
litigation
suffices
say
reasons
heretofore
set
conclude
district
applied
tests
laid
younger
determining
whether
proceed
merits
appellee
prayer
relief
ohio
civil
nuisance
proceeding
appellee
contends
even
younger
applicable
civil
proceedings
sort
nonetheless
govern
case
time
district
acted
longer
pending
state
proceeding
term
used
younger
younger
subsequent
cases
steffel
used
term
pending
proceeding
distinguish
state
proceedings
already
commenced
merely
incipient
threatened
course
state
proceeding
begun
long
appellee
sought
intervention
district
appellee
point
take
state
proceeding
begun
ended
time
district
complaint
filed
appellee
apparently
relies
facts
allen
county
common
pleas
already
issued
judgment
permanent
injunction
action
filed
appeal
judgment
ever
taken
ohio
appellate
courts
matter
state
procedure
judgment
presumably
became
final
sense
nonappealable
point
district
filing
possibly
prior
entry
district
judgment
surely
single
judge
stayed
state
judgment
need
however
engage
inquiry
regardless
common
pleas
judgment
became
final
believe
necessary
concomitant
younger
party
appellee
posture
must
exhaust
state
appellate
remedies
seeking
relief
district
unless
bring
within
one
exceptions
specified
younger
virtually
evils
younger
directed
inhere
federal
intervention
prior
completion
state
appellate
proceedings
surely
intervention
occurred
trial
intervention
later
stage
anything
highly
duplicative
since
entire
trial
already
taken
place
also
direct
aspersion
capabilities
good
faith
state
appellate
courts
nuisance
proceedings
federal
intervention
appellate
stage
less
disruption
state
efforts
protect
interests
deems
important
indeed
likely
even
disruptive
offensive
state
already
nisi
prius
determination
valid
policies
violated
fashion
justifies
judicial
abatement
federal
intervention
fashion
designed
annul
results
state
trial
also
deprives
function
quite
legitimately
left
overseeing
trial
dispositions
constitutional
issues
arise
civil
litigation
jurisdiction
think
consideration
importance
typically
judicial
system
appellate
courts
nature
litigant
appropriate
forum
resolution
constitutional
contentions
especially
true
constitutional
issue
involves
statute
capable
judicial
narrowing
short
believe
state
judicial
system
fairly
accorded
opportunity
resolve
federal
issues
arising
courts
federal
district
permitted
substitute
state
appellate
courts
therefore
hold
younger
standards
must
met
justify
federal
intervention
state
judicial
proceeding
losing
litigant
exhausted
state
appellate
remedies
time
appellee
filed
action
district
available
remedy
appeal
ohio
appellate
courts
appellee
nonetheless
contends
exhaustion
state
appellate
remedies
required
appeal
futile
claim
based
decision
ohio
state
ex
rel
keating
motion
picture
film
entitled
vixen
ohio
rendered
time
proceedings
common
pleas
keating
uphold
use
nuisance
statute
film
ran
afoul
ohio
statutory
definition
obscenity
absolutely
nothing
say
respect
appellee
principal
contention
whether
first
fourteenth
amendments
prohibit
blanket
injunction
showing
films
including
adjudged
obscene
adversary
proceedings
therefore
difficulty
understanding
appellee
belief
appeal
doomed
failure
importantly
opinion
considerations
comity
federalism
underlie
younger
permit
truncation
exhaustion
requirement
merely
losing
party
state
general
jurisdiction
believes
chances
success
appeal
auspicious
appellee
obviously
believes
possessed
viable
federal
claim
else
assiduously
seek
litigate
district
yet
art
vi
constitution
declares
judges
every
state
shall
bound
federal
constitution
laws
treaties
appellee
truth
urging
us
base
rule
assumption
state
judges
faithful
constitutional
responsibilities
refuse
district
entertained
action
seeking
preappeal
interference
state
judicial
proceeding
unless
appellee
established
early
intervention
justified
one
exceptions
recognized
younger
vi
younger
civil
counterpart
apply
today
course
allow
intervention
cases
district
properly
finds
state
proceeding
motivated
desire
harass
conducted
bad
faith
challenged
statute
flagrantly
patently
violative
express
constitutional
prohibitions
every
clause
sentence
paragraph
whatever
manner
whomever
effort
might
made
apply
noted
district
case
rule
younger
issue
thus
apparently
considered
whether
intervention
justified
one
narrow
exceptions
even
district
opinion
interpreted
sub
silentio
determination
case
fits
within
exception
statutes
flagrantly
patently
violative
express
constitutional
prohibitions
characterization
statute
possible
subsequent
decision
ohio
state
ex
rel
ewing
motion
picture
film
entitled
without
stitch
ohio
case
narrowly
construed
ohio
nuisance
statute
view
avoiding
constitutional
difficulties
concerned
district
therefore
think
case
appropriate
remand
district
may
consider
whether
irreparable
injury
shown
light
without
stitch
whether
injury
nature
district
may
assume
jurisdiction
exception
policy
federal
judicial
interference
state
proceedings
kind
judgment
district
vacated
cause
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
sosna
directed
parties
address
younger
issue
reflecting
concern
whether
constitutional
merits
reached
light
sosna
failure
appeal
state
trial
adverse
ruling
state
appellate
network
parties
urged
proceed
merits
reach
issue
sosna
see
miller
california
discusses
distinction
pornography
obscenity
definitions
used
sections
revised
code
relating
nuisances
nuisance
means
defined
declared
statutes
also
means
place
upon
lewdness
assignation
prostitution
conducted
permitted
continued
exists
place
upon
lewd
indecent
lascivious
obscene
films
plate
negatives
film
plate
positives
films
designed
projected
screen
exhibition
films
glass
slides
either
negative
positive
form
designed
exhibition
projection
screen
photographed
manufactured
developed
screened
exhibited
otherwise
prepared
shown
personal
property
contents
used
conducting
maintaining
place
purpose
chapter
shall
affect
newspaper
magazine
publication
entered
second
class
matter
department
interpreted
ohio
state
ex
rel
keating
motion
picture
film
entitled
vixen
ohio
determination
obscenity
based
definition
contained
ohio
criminal
statutes
ohio
rev
code
ann
supp
remand
keating
following
decision
miller
california
supra
ohio
concluded
statute
definition
comported
miller
constitutional
standards
ohio
content
judgment
order
existence
nuisance
admitted
established
action
provided
sections
inclusive
revised
code
criminal
proceeding
order
abatement
shall
entered
part
judgment
case
order
shall
direct
removal
place
personal
property
contents
used
conducting
nuisance
already
released
authority
provided
section
revised
code
shall
direct
sale
thereof
belong
defendants
notified
appearing
manner
provided
sale
chattels
execution
order
shall
also
require
renewal
one
year
bond
furnished
owner
real
property
provided
section
revised
code
furnished
shall
continue
one
year
closing
order
issued
time
granting
temporary
injunction
closing
order
issued
shall
include
order
directing
effectual
closing
place
use
purpose
keeping
closed
period
one
year
unless
sooner
released
owner
place
closed
released
bond
may
appear
obtain
release
manner
upon
fulfilling
requirements
provided
section
revised
code
release
property
section
shall
release
judgment
lien
penalty
liability
may
subject
owners
unsold
personal
property
contents
seized
must
appear
claim
within
ten
days
order
abatement
made
prove
innocence
satisfaction
knowledge
said
use
thereof
reasonable
care
diligence
known
thereof
every
defendant
action
presumed
knowledge
general
reputation
place
innocence
established
unsold
personal
property
contents
shall
delivered
owner
otherwise
shall
sold
provided
section
removing
selling
personal
property
contents
officer
shall
entitled
charge
receive
fees
levying
upon
selling
like
property
execution
closing
place
keeping
closed
reasonable
sum
shall
allowed
ohio
rev
code
ann
supra
ibid
referenced
portion
provides
owner
real
personal
property
closed
restrained
closed
restrained
may
appear
filing
petition
hearing
application
permanent
injunction
upon
payment
costs
incurred
upon
filing
bond
owner
real
property
sureties
approved
clerk
full
value
property
ascertained
vacation
judge
conditioned
owner
immediately
abate
nuisance
prevent
established
kept
decision
judge
rendered
application
permanent
injunction
judge
vacation
satisfied
good
faith
owner
real
property
innocence
part
owner
personal
property
knowledge
use
personal
property
nuisance
reasonable
care
diligence
owner
known
thereof
shall
deliver
real
personal
property
respective
owners
thereof
discharge
refrain
issuing
time
hearing
application
temporary
injunction
order
closing
real
property
restraining
removal
interference
personal
property
release
real
personal
property
section
shall
release
judgment
lien
penalty
liability
may
subjected
state
ex
rel
huffman
dakota
civ
com
pleas
allen
county
ohio
judgment
primarily
directed
property
interest
pursue
succeeded
district
concluded
pursue
standing
challenge
nuisance
statute
similarly
counsel
pursue
conceded
oral
argument
pursue
appealed
judgment
common
pleas
within
ohio
system
pending
convening
single
judge
northern
district
ohio
stayed
judgment
common
pleas
except
insofar
judgment
applied
films
declared
obscene
prior
adversary
hearing
stay
order
entered
day
action
filed
one
day
entry
judgment
common
pleas
nd
ohio
apr
samuels
mackell
boyle
landry
perez
ledesma
dyson
stein
byrne
karalexis
see
spielman
motor
sales
dodge
beal
missouri
watson
buck
williams
miller
douglas
city
jeannette
title
provides
may
grant
injunction
stay
proceedings
state
except
expressly
authorized
act
congress
necessary
aid
jurisdiction
protect
effectuate
judgments
held
mitchum
foster
contained
expressly
authorized
congressional
exception
thus
statute
express
general
congressional
attitude
recognized
younger
control
case
us
today
standards
governing
federal
interference
largely
shaped
context
prayers
federal
injunctions
state
proceedings
clear
respect
pending
prosecutions
standards
apply
interference
form
declaratory
relief
see
samuels
mackell
relation
proceeding
nominally
civil
state
criminal
laws
relied
lower
federal
courts
resolving
younger
problems
see
mtm
baxley
supp
nd
probable
jurisdiction
noted
palaio
mcauliffe
way
intend
suggest
right
access
federal
forum
disposition
federal
issues
normal
rules
res
judicata
judicial
estoppel
operate
bar
relitigation
actions
federal
issues
arising
state
proceedings
cf
preiser
rodriguez
assumption
made
solely
means
disposing
appellee
contentions
without
confronting
issues
briefed
argued
case
ordinarily
difficult
consider
problem
duration
younger
restrictions
entry
state
trial
judgment
without
also
considering
res
judicata
implications
judgment
however
appellants
plead
res
judicata
district
therefore
available
see
fed
rule
civ
proc
sosna
iowa
state
judicial
system
may
retain
undisturbed
jurisdiction
despite
possibly
erroneous
trial
disposition
constitutional
issues
recognized
dombrowski
pfister
stated
mere
possibility
erroneous
initial
application
constitutional
standards
usually
amount
irreparable
injury
necessary
justify
disruption
orderly
state
proceedings
requiring
exhaustion
state
appellate
remedies
purposes
applying
younger
way
undermine
monroe
pape
held
one
seeking
redress
deprivation
federal
rights
need
first
initiate
state
proceedings
based
related
state
causes
action
monroe
pape
nothing
problem
presently
us
deference
accorded
state
proceedings
already
initiated
afford
competent
tribunal
resolution
federal
issues
exhaustion
requirement
likewise
inconsistent
cases
city
bank
farmers
trust
schnader
bacon
rutland
expressed
doctrine
federal
equity
plaintiff
challenging
state
administrative
action
need
exhausted
state
judicial
remedies
cases
deal
situations
state
judicial
process
initiated
appellee
option
appeal
state
courts
time
filed
action
know
certain
whether
remedy
remained
available
time
district
issued
permanent
injunction
whether
remains
available
event
appellee
may
avoid
standards
younger
simply
failing
comply
procedures
perfecting
appeal
within
ohio
judicial
system
without
stitch
decided
closure
provisions
ohio
rev
code
ann
applicable
even
theater
shown
one
film
adjudged
obscene
however
ohio
concerned
constitutional
implications
prior
restraint
films
adjudged
narrowing
statute
noted
specifies
conditions
release
may
obtained
closure
order
property
owner
must
appear
pay
cost
incurred
action
file
bond
full
value
property
demonstrate
prevent
nuisance
made
critical
clarification
nuisance
exhibition
particular
film
declared
obscene
release
provisions
appellants
contend
require
owner
show
film
exhibited
period
obscene
requirement
impossible
practical
matter
also
unconstitutional
prior
restraint
ohio
mr
dissent
treatment
state
civil
proceeding
one
aid
closely
related
criminal
statutes
obviously
first
step
toward
extending
state
civil
proceedings
generally
holding
younger
harris
federal
courts
interfere
pending
state
criminal
proceedings
except
extraordinary
circumstances
similarly
today
holding
plaintiff
action
may
maintain
without
first
exhausting
state
appellate
procedures
review
adverse
state
trial
decision
obvious
first
step
toward
discard
heretofore
settled
law
actions
may
maintained
without
first
exhausting
state
judicial
remedies
younger
harris
basically
application
context
relation
federal
courts
pending
state
criminal
prosecutions
basic
doctrine
equity
jurisprudence
courts
equity
particularly
act
restrain
criminal
prosecution
maxim
equity
enjoin
criminal
prosecution
summarizes
centuries
weighty
experience
law
stefanelli
minard
younger
harris
also
decision
enforcing
national
policy
forbidding
federal
courts
stay
enjoin
pending
state
criminal
proceedings
except
special
circumstances
see
also
decisions
long
antedating
younger
harris
invested
basic
maxim
particular
significance
restraint
upon
federal
equitable
interference
pending
state
prosecutions
showing
irreparable
injury
alone
irreparable
injury
great
immediate
required
justify
federal
injunctive
relief
pending
state
prosecution
fenner
boykin
spielman
motor
sales
dodge
injury
merely
incidental
every
criminal
proceeding
brought
lawfully
good
faith
irreparable
injury
justifies
injunction
douglas
city
jeannette
see
also
dombrowski
pfister
line
decisions
culminating
younger
harris
reflects
longstanding
recognition
equitable
interference
federal
courts
pending
state
prosecutions
incompatible
federal
system
paramount
role
definition
crimes
enforcement
criminal
laws
noninterference
state
prosecution
crimes
protects
sensitive
source
friction
nation
stefanelli
minard
supra
tradition
however
quite
opposite
respects
federal
injunctive
interference
pending
state
civil
proceedings
even
though
legislation
far
back
provided
seemingly
uncompromising
language
mitchum
foster
federal
may
grant
injunction
stay
proceedings
state
specified
exceptions
see
consistently
engrafted
exceptions
upon
prohibition
many
exceptions
engrafted
euphemism
implied
story
appears
mitchum
foster
supra
indeed
congress
became
concerned
decision
toucey
new
york
life
ins
forecast
possibility
act
might
enforced
according
literal
terms
congress
amended
act
restore
basic
law
generally
understood
interpreted
prior
toucey
decision
mitchum
foster
supra
thus
today
extension
younger
harris
turns
clock
back
portends
resuscitation
literal
command
act
state
courts
free
interference
federal
injunction
even
civil
cases
overrule
decades
jurisprudence
heedlessly
flout
congress
evident
purpose
enacting
amendment
acquiesce
jurisprudence
extension
also
threatens
serious
prejudice
potential
plaintiff
present
pending
state
proceeding
criminal
prosecution
prosecution
come
existence
completion
steps
designed
safeguard
spurious
prosecution
arrest
charge
information
indictment
contrast
civil
proceeding
case
comes
existence
merely
upon
filing
complaint
whether
well
founded
deny
fiat
potential
federal
plaintiff
federal
forum
circumstance
obviously
arm
adversary
public
authorities
easily
wielded
weapon
strip
forum
remedy
federal
statutes
enacted
assure
escape
consequence
characterizing
state
civil
proceeding
involved
aid
closely
related
criminal
statutes
nuisance
action
brought
mere
filing
complaint
state
untoward
consequences
federal
plaintiff
thereby
set
train
without
regard
connection
proceeding
state
criminal
laws
even
extension
younger
harris
pending
state
civil
proceedings
appropriate
case
think
plainly
improper
case
action
federal
plaintiff
case
grounded
upon
statute
serves
particular
congressional
objective
long
recognized
enforced
today
extension
defeat
objective
war
nationalism
dominated
political
thought
brought
congressional
investiture
federal
judiciary
enormously
increased
powers
zwickler
koota
section
enacted
time
civil
rights
act
stat
act
judiciary
act
granted
federal
courts
general
jurisdiction
completely
altered
congress
war
policy
relying
state
courts
vindicate
rights
arising
constitution
federal
laws
statutes
constituted
lower
federal
courts
primary
powerful
reliances
vindicating
every
right
given
constitution
laws
treaties
steffel
thompson
fact
standing
alone
state
courts
also
must
protect
federal
rights
never
justify
refusal
federal
courts
exercise
jurisdiction
zwickler
koota
supra
true
notwithstanding
possibility
review
state
decisions
even
available
appeal
rather
discretionary
writ
certiorari
possibility
inadequate
substitute
initial
district
determination
litigant
entitled
federal
courts
england
louisiana
state
board
medical
examiners
consistently
congressional
objective
acts
held
monroe
pape
federal
plaintiff
suing
need
exhaust
state
administrative
judicial
remedies
filing
action
federal
district
federal
remedy
supplementary
state
remedy
latter
need
first
sought
refused
federal
one
invoked
ibid
extension
today
younger
harris
require
exhaustion
action
drastically
undercuts
monroe
pape
numerous
progeny
mere
filing
complaint
potential
litigant
forces
exhaust
state
remedies
mitchum
foster
supra
holding
actions
excepted
operation
federal
statute
also
undercut
today
extension
younger
mitchum
canvassed
history
concluded
extended
federal
power
attempt
remedy
state
courts
failure
secure
federal
rights
mitchum
prompted
comment
younger
harris
extended
civil
cases
much
rigidity
section
reintroduced
significance
mitchum
seeking
relief
state
civil
proceedings
largely
destroyed
recognition
section
exception
statute
pyrrhic
victory
today
decision
fulfills
gloomy
prophecy
therefore
dissent
remand
reach
merits
justice
douglas
joining
opinion
justice
brennan
wishes
make
clear
adheres
view
expressed
younger
harris
dissenting
opinion
federal
abstention
interference
state
criminal
prosecutions
inconsistent
demands
federalism
important
overriding
civil
rights
involved
first
amendment
sacrificed
reaches
younger
issue
although
appellants
plead
younger
district
yet
implies
younger
jurisdictional
matter
since
allowed
parties
waive
sosna
iowa
ante
circumstance
address
younger
issue
solely
respond
treatment
abstention
authoritative
resolution
state
courts
ambiguities
state
statute
sufficiently
likely
avoid
significantly
modify
federal
questions
raised
statute
another
matter
abstention
justified
cases
primarily
policy
avoidance
premature
constitutional
adjudication
federal
plaintiff
therefore
dismissed
federal
younger
cases
contrary
may
reserve
federal
questions
decision
federal
district
submit
state
courts
england
louisiana
state
board
medical
examiners
accordingly
retention
federal
jurisdiction
federal
complaint
pending
decision
dismissal
complaint
correct
practice
lake
carriers
assn
macmullan
title
provides
every
person
color
statute
ordinance
regulation
custom
usage
state
territory
subjects
causes
subjected
citizen
person
within
jurisdiction
thereof
deprivation
rights
privileges
immunities
secured
constitution
laws
shall
liable
party
injured
action
law
suit
equity
proper
proceeding
redress
note
term
harv
rev