williams
taylor
warden
argued
february
decided
april
petitioner
convicted
two
capital
murders
crimes
sentenced
death
virginia
affirmed
direct
appeal
later
dismissed
petitioner
state
habeas
corpus
petition
sought
federal
habeas
relief
requesting
among
things
evidentiary
hearing
three
constitutional
claims
unable
develop
proceedings
claims
prosecution
violated
brady
maryland
failing
disclose
report
pretrial
psychiatric
examination
jeffrey
cruse
petitioner
accomplice
commonwealth
main
witness
petitioner
trial
rendered
unfair
seating
juror
voir
dire
revealed
possible
sources
bias
prosecutor
committed
misconduct
failing
reveal
knowledge
juror
possible
bias
district
granted
evidentiary
hearing
inter
alia
latter
two
claims
denied
hearing
brady
claim
hearing
held
however
fourth
circuit
granted
commonwealth
requests
emergency
stay
writ
mandamus
prohibition
based
argument
evidentiary
hearing
prohibited
amended
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
remand
district
vacated
order
granting
evidentiary
hearing
dismissed
petition
determined
petitioner
satisfy
requirements
affirming
fourth
circuit
agreed
petitioner
argument
statute
apply
exercised
diligence
state
held
among
things
diligent
failed
develop
factual
basis
three
claim
state
concluded
petitioner
satisfy
statute
conditions
excusing
failure
develop
facts
held
barred
receiving
evidentiary
hearing
held
amended
aedpa
fail
ure
develop
claim
factual
basis
state
proceedings
established
unless
lack
diligence
greater
fault
attributable
prisoner
counsel
statute
bar
evidentiary
hearing
petitioner
seeks
juror
bias
prosecutorial
misconduct
claims
bars
hearing
brady
claim
failed
develop
claim
factual
basis
state
concedes
inability
satisfy
statute
stringent
conditions
excusing
deficiency
pp
petitioner
filed
federal
habeas
petition
aedpa
effective
date
case
controlled
opening
clause
specifies
federal
habeas
applicant
failed
develop
factual
basis
claim
state
proceedings
shall
hold
evidentiary
hearing
claim
unless
applicant
makes
specified
showings
pp
analysis
begins
language
statute
although
fail
sometimes
used
neutral
way
importing
fault
want
diligence
sense
word
failed
used
statute
words
must
given
ordinary
contemporary
common
meaning
absent
indication
congress
intended
bear
different
import
walters
metropolitan
ed
enterprises
customary
preferred
sense
fail
connotes
omission
fault
negligence
part
person
failed
something
congress
instead
intended
standard
use
lieu
phrase
failed
phrase
interpretation
support
keeney
whose
threshold
standard
diligence
codified
opening
clause
interpretation
also
avoids
putting
needless
tension
authorizes
habeas
relief
prisoner
developed
claim
state
prove
state
decision
contrary
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
rejects
commonwealth
arguments
reading
treating
prisoner
lack
diligence
state
prerequisite
application
renders
nullity
ii
provision
requiring
prisoner
show
factual
predicate
claim
previously
discovered
exercise
due
diligence
anything
less
understanding
contrary
aedpa
purpose
comity
finality
federalism
principles
pp
petitioner
exercise
diligence
required
preserve
claim
nondisclosure
cruse
psychiatric
report
contravened
brady
report
mentioned
cruse
little
recollection
murders
intoxicated
time
prepared
petitioner
tried
yet
raised
petitioner
filed
federal
habeas
petition
given
evidence
record
state
habeas
counsel
knew
report
existence
potential
importance
yet
failed
investigate
anything
cursory
manner
satisfied
petitioner
explanation
although
investigator
federal
habeas
counsel
discovered
report
cruse
file
state
counsel
seen
report
reviewed
file
constitutes
failure
develop
factual
basis
petitioner
brady
claim
state
must
determine
requirements
balance
satisfied
petitioner
failure
excused
subparagraph
conditions
hearing
upon
showing
clear
convincing
evidence
reasonable
factfinder
found
petitioner
guilty
capital
murder
alleged
constitutional
error
petitioner
concedes
make
showing
case
presented
premise
accordingly
fourth
circuit
judgment
barring
evidentiary
hearing
claim
affirmed
pp
however
petitioner
met
burden
showing
diligent
efforts
develop
facts
supporting
juror
bias
prosecutorial
misconduct
claims
state
claims
based
two
questions
posed
trial
judge
voir
dire
first
judge
asked
prospective
jurors
whether
related
inter
alios
deputy
sheriff
meinhard
investigated
crime
scene
interrogated
cruse
later
became
prosecution
first
witness
venire
member
stinnett
divorced
meinhard
marriage
four
children
remained
silent
thereby
indicating
answer
question
second
judge
asked
whether
prospective
juror
ever
represented
attorneys
case
including
prosecutor
woodson
stinnett
said
nothing
although
woodson
represented
divorce
meinhard
later
woodson
admitted
knew
stinnett
meinhard
married
divorced
stated
consider
divorced
people
related
recollection
involved
private
attorney
divorce
stinnett
silence
first
question
suggest
factfinder
unwillingness
forthcoming
turn
bear
failure
disclose
woodson
attorney
moreover
failure
divulge
material
information
response
second
question
misleading
matter
fact
woodson
counsel
coupled
woodson
reticence
omissions
whole
disclose
need
evidentiary
hearing
disagrees
fourth
circuit
conclusion
petitioner
state
habeas
counsel
discovered
stinnett
relationship
meinhard
woodson
trial
record
contains
evidence
put
reasonable
attorney
notice
stinnett
nonresponse
deliberate
omission
material
information
counsel
reason
believe
stinnett
married
meinhard
represented
woodson
moreover
state
postconviction
relief
longer
available
time
facts
came
light
futile
petitioner
return
virginia
courts
said
failed
develop
facts
state
reason
neglected
pursue
remedies
available
virginia
law
foregoing
analysis
establishes
cause
procedural
default
petitioner
may
committed
presenting
claims
virginia
courts
first
instance
questions
regarding
standard
determining
prejudice
petitioner
must
establish
obtain
relief
claims
addressed
lower
courts
proceedings
courts
take
due
account
district
earlier
decision
grant
evidentiary
hearing
based
part
belief
stinnett
deliberately
lied
voir
dire
pp
affirmed
part
reversed
part
remanded
kennedy
delivered
opinion
unanimous
michael
wayne
williams
petitioner
john
taylor
warden
writ
certiorari
appeals
fourth
circuit
april
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
petitioner
michael
wayne
williams
received
capital
sentence
murders
morris
keller
keller
wife
mary
elizabeth
petitioner
later
sought
writ
habeas
corpus
federal
accompanying
petition
request
evidentiary
hearing
constitutional
claims
alleged
unable
develop
proceedings
question
case
whether
supp
iii
amended
antiterrorism
effective
death
penalty
act
aedpa
stat
bars
evidentiary
hearing
petitioner
seeks
petitioner
failed
develop
factual
basis
claim
state
proceedings
case
subject
may
receive
hearing
concedes
inability
satisfy
statute
stringent
conditions
excusing
deficiency
evening
february
verena
lozano
james
dropped
petitioner
friend
jeffrey
alan
cruse
near
local
store
rural
area
cumberland
county
virginia
pair
planned
rob
store
employees
customers
using
revolver
petitioner
stolen
course
quadruple
murder
robbery
committed
two
months
earlier
finding
store
closed
petitioner
cruse
walked
kellers
home
petitioner
familiar
couple
grown
road
lived
told
cruse
couple
thousand
dollars
app
cruse
holding
handed
gun
petitioner
knocked
door
keller
opened
door
petitioner
pointed
gun
two
intruders
forced
way
inside
petitioner
cruse
forced
keller
kitchen
discovered
keller
petitioner
ordered
captives
remove
clothing
petitioner
kept
guard
kellers
cruse
searched
house
money
valuables
found
handgun
bullets
upon
cruse
return
kitchen
petitioner
cruse
tie
captives
telephone
cords
kellers
confined
separate
closets
intruders
continued
ransacking
house
gathered
wanted
petitioner
cruse
decided
rape
keller
keller
pleading
hurt
husband
petitioner
raped
cruse
petitioner
ordered
kellers
shower
dress
take
walk
cruse
leaving
petitioner
told
keller
cruse
going
burn
house
keller
begged
allowed
retrieve
marriage
license
guarded
petitioner
prosecution
later
presented
case
details
murders
follows
petitioner
carrying
cruse
carrying
took
kellers
thicket
dirt
road
house
petitioner
standing
behind
keller
cruse
behind
keller
petitioner
told
cruse
shoot
count
three
third
count
petitioner
shot
keller
head
keller
collapsed
ground
cruse
shoot
keller
moment
saying
want
leave
witnesses
petitioner
urged
cruse
shoot
keller
ibid
cruse
fired
one
shot
head
despite
wound
keller
stood
petitioner
shot
second
time
ensure
kellers
dead
petitioner
shot
two
three
times
returning
house
loading
stolen
property
kellers
jeep
petitioner
cruse
set
fire
house
drove
jeep
fredericksburg
virginia
sold
property
threw
remaining
property
revolver
rappahannock
river
set
fire
jeep
pursuing
lead
verena
james
police
interviewed
cruse
fire
kellers
home
petitioner
fled
florida
cruse
provided
useful
information
police
discovered
bodies
victims
point
cruse
consulted
counsel
plea
bargain
cruse
agreed
disclose
details
crimes
exchange
commonwealth
promise
seek
death
penalty
cruse
described
murders
made
mention
act
rape
commonwealth
discovered
omission
revoked
plea
agreement
charged
cruse
capital
murder
petitioner
arrested
charged
robbery
abduction
rape
capital
murders
kellers
trial
january
cruse
commonwealth
main
witness
recounted
murders
described
cruse
testified
petitioner
raped
keller
shot
keller
least
twice
shot
keller
several
times
felled
cruse
bullet
also
described
petitioner
mastermind
murders
circumstances
first
plea
agreement
commonwealth
cruse
revocation
disclosed
jury
app
testifying
behalf
petitioner
admitted
first
shoot
keller
idea
rob
store
set
fire
house
denied
however
raping
shooting
keller
claimed
shot
keller
petitioner
blamed
cruse
remaining
shots
disputed
parts
cruse
testimony
jury
convicted
petitioner
counts
considering
aggravating
mitigating
evidence
presented
sentencing
phase
jury
found
aggravating
circumstances
future
dangerousness
vileness
crimes
recommended
death
sentence
trial
imposed
recommended
sentence
virginia
affirmed
petitioner
convictions
sentence
williams
commonwealth
denied
certiorari
williams
virginia
separate
proceeding
cruse
pleaded
guilty
capital
murder
keller
murder
keller
prosecution
asked
sentencing
spare
life
testimony
petitioner
cruse
sentenced
life
imprisonment
petitioner
filed
habeas
petition
state
alleging
relevant
part
commonwealth
failed
disclose
second
agreement
reached
cruse
first
one
revoked
new
agreement
petitioner
alleged
informal
undertaking
prosecution
recommend
life
sentence
exchange
cruse
testimony
finding
merit
petitioner
claims
virginia
dismissed
habeas
petition
denied
certiorari
williams
netherland
petitioner
filed
habeas
petition
district
eastern
district
virginia
november
addition
claim
regarding
alleged
undisclosed
agreement
commonwealth
cruse
petition
raised
three
claims
relevant
questions
us
first
petitioner
claimed
prosecution
violated
brady
maryland
failing
disclose
report
confidential
psychiatric
examination
cruse
second
petitioner
alleged
trial
rendered
unfair
seating
juror
voir
dire
revealed
possible
sources
bias
finally
petitioner
alleged
one
prosecutors
committed
misconduct
failing
reveal
knowledge
juror
possible
bias
district
granted
evidentiary
hearing
undisclosed
agreement
allegations
juror
bias
prosecutorial
misconduct
denied
hearing
psychiatric
report
evidentiary
hearing
held
commonwealth
filed
application
emergency
stay
petition
writ
mandamus
prohibition
appeals
commonwealth
argued
petitioner
evidentiary
hearing
prohibited
supp
iii
divided
panel
appeals
granted
emergency
stay
remanded
district
apply
statute
petitioner
request
evidentiary
hearing
remand
district
vacated
order
granting
evidentiary
hearing
dismissed
petition
determined
petitioner
satisfy
requirements
appeals
affirmed
first
considered
petitioner
argument
apply
case
diligent
attempting
develop
claims
state
citing
decision
cardwell
greene
cert
denied
appeals
agreed
petitioner
apply
exercised
diligence
state
held
however
petitioner
diligent
failed
develop
state
factual
bases
brady
juror
bias
prosecutorial
misconduct
claims
see
appeals
concluded
petitioner
satisfy
statute
conditions
excusing
failure
develop
facts
held
barred
receiving
evidentiary
hearing
appeals
ruled
alternative
even
apply
petitioner
ineligible
evidentiary
hearing
cause
prejudice
standard
law
see
addressing
petitioner
claim
undisclosed
informal
agreement
commonwealth
cruse
appeals
rejected
merits
result
consider
whether
applied
see
october
petitioner
filed
application
stay
execution
petition
writ
certiorari
october
stayed
petitioner
execution
granted
certiorari
decide
whether
precludes
receiving
evidentiary
hearing
claims
see
affirm
part
reverse
part
ii
petitioner
filed
federal
habeas
petition
aedpa
effective
date
statute
applies
case
see
lindh
murphy
commonwealth
argues
aedpa
bars
petitioner
receiving
evidentiary
hearing
claim
whose
factual
basis
developed
state
absent
narrow
circumstances
applicable
petitioner
develop
raise
claims
juror
bias
prosecutorial
misconduct
prosecution
alleged
brady
violation
regarding
cruse
psychiatric
report
filed
federal
habeas
petition
petitioner
explains
developed
claims
earlier
unaware
fault
underlying
facts
consequence
petitioner
contends
aedpa
erects
barrier
evidentiary
hearing
federal
section
provision
controls
whether
petitioner
may
receive
evidentiary
hearing
federal
district
claims
developed
virginia
courts
becomes
central
point
analysis
provides
follows
applicant
failed
develop
factual
basis
claim
state
proceedings
shall
hold
evidentiary
hearing
claim
unless
applicant
shows
claim
relies
new
rule
constitutional
law
made
retroactive
cases
collateral
review
previously
unavailable
ii
factual
predicate
previously
discovered
exercise
due
diligence
facts
underlying
claim
sufficient
establish
clear
convincing
evidence
constitutional
error
reasonable
factfinder
found
applicant
guilty
underlying
offense
terms
opening
clause
statute
applies
prisoners
failed
develop
factual
basis
claim
state
proceedings
prisoner
failed
develop
facts
evidentiary
hearing
granted
unless
prisoner
case
meets
conditions
petitioner
concedes
case
comply
see
brief
petitioner
may
receive
evidentiary
hearing
claims
fall
outside
opening
clause
hearing
state
claims
petitioner
seeks
evidentiary
hearing
says
commonwealth
end
matter
view
petitioner
whether
fault
neglect
still
failed
develop
factual
basis
claim
state
proceedings
petitioner
hand
says
phrase
failed
develop
means
lack
diligence
developing
claims
defalcation
contends
occur
since
made
adequate
efforts
proceedings
discover
present
underlying
facts
appeals
agreed
petitioner
interpretation
believed
petitioner
exercised
enough
diligence
avoid
statutory
bar
see
agree
petitioner
appeals
failed
develop
implies
lack
diligence
unlike
appeals
find
lack
diligence
petitioner
part
regard
two
three
claims
start
always
language
statute
see
ron
pair
enterprises
section
begins
conditional
clause
applicant
failed
develop
factual
basis
claim
state
proceedings
directs
attention
prisoner
efforts
state
ask
first
whether
factual
basis
indeed
developed
state
question
susceptible
normal
course
simple
yes
answer
answer
commonwealth
analysis
begin
end
reading
statute
factual
development
state
federal
habeas
may
inquire
reasons
default
determining
whether
opening
clause
applies
agree
commonwealth
interpretation
word
failed
deny
fail
sometimes
used
neutral
way
importing
fault
want
diligence
phrase
fail
understand
argument
mean
simply
understand
argument
sense
word
failed
used
however
give
words
statute
ordinary
contemporary
common
meaning
absent
indication
congress
intended
bear
different
import
walters
metropolitan
ed
enterprises
quoting
pioneer
investment
services
brunswick
associates
partnership
see
also
bailey
customary
preferred
sense
fail
connotes
omission
fault
negligence
part
person
failed
something
see
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
defining
fail
wanting
fall
short
become
deficient
measure
degree
failure
falling
short
deficiency
lack
mission
perform
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
leave
possible
expected
action
unperformed
condition
unachieved
see
also
black
law
dictionary
ed
defining
fail
ault
negligence
refusal
say
person
failed
duty
implies
take
necessary
steps
fulfill
consequence
fault
bears
responsibility
failure
sense
person
fault
diligent
efforts
perform
act
thwarted
example
conduct
another
happenstance
fault
lies
circumstances
either
person
interfered
accomplishment
act
one
conclude
congress
used
word
failed
sense
described
congress
intended
standard
difficulty
making
intent
plain
use
lieu
phrase
failed
phrase
opening
clause
failure
develop
factual
basis
claim
established
unless
lack
diligence
greater
fault
attributable
prisoner
prisoner
counsel
agree
appeals
courts
appeals
addressed
issue
see
baja
ducharme
miller
champion
cardwell
mcdonald
johnson
burris
parke
love
morton
interpretation
opening
clause
support
keeney
case
decided
four
years
aedpa
enactment
keeney
prisoner
little
knowledge
english
sought
evidentiary
hearing
federal
alleging
nolo
contendere
plea
manslaughter
charge
knowing
voluntary
inaccuracies
translation
plea
proceedings
prisoner
developed
facts
claim
state
collateral
proceedings
omission
caused
negligence
state
postconviction
counsel
see
characterized
prisoner
failure
develop
material
facts
state
required
prisoner
demonstrate
cause
prejudice
excusing
default
receive
hearing
claim
unless
prisoner
show
fundamental
miscarriage
justice
result
failure
hold
federal
evidentiary
hearing
section
initial
inquiry
whether
applicant
failed
develop
factual
basis
claim
state
proceedings
echoes
keeney
language
regarding
state
prisoner
failure
develop
material
facts
state
keeney
borrowed
cause
prejudice
standard
applied
procedurally
defaulted
claims
see
wainwright
sykes
deciding
reason
distinguish
failing
properly
assert
federal
claim
state
failing
state
properly
develop
claim
keeney
supra
evident
similarity
phrasing
keeney
opening
clause
congress
intended
preserve
least
one
aspect
keeney
holding
prisoners
fault
deficiency
record
must
satisfy
heightened
standard
obtain
evidentiary
hearing
sure
requiring
prisoners
diligent
satisfy
provisions
rather
show
cause
prejudice
eliminating
freestanding
miscarriage
justice
exception
congress
raised
bar
keeney
imposed
prisoners
diligent
proceedings
contrary
commonwealth
position
however
basis
text
believe
congress
used
fail
different
sense
keeney
otherwise
intended
statute
stringent
requirements
control
availability
evidentiary
hearing
broader
class
cases
covered
keeney
cause
prejudice
standard
sum
opening
clause
codifies
keeney
threshold
standard
diligence
prisoners
satisfy
keeney
test
excusing
deficiency
record
prior
aedpa
controlled
words
used
later
statute
governing
subject
matter
respectful
congress
processes
give
words
meaning
absence
specific
direction
contrary
see
lorillard
pons
congress
adopts
new
law
incorporating
sections
prior
law
congress
normally
presumed
knowledge
interpretation
given
incorporated
law
least
insofar
affects
new
statute
see
also
cottage
savings
assn
commissioner
interpreting
failed
requires
lack
diligence
fault
avoids
putting
needless
tension
prisoner
developed
claim
state
prove
state
decision
contrary
unreasonable
application
clearly
established
federal
law
determined
barred
obtaining
relief
see
williams
taylor
ante
opinion
opening
clause
covers
request
evidentiary
hearing
claim
pursued
diligence
remained
undeveloped
state
instance
prosecution
concealed
facts
prisoner
lacking
clear
convincing
evidence
innocence
barred
hearing
claim
even
satisfy
see
failed
develop
clause
bear
harsh
reading
attribute
congress
purpose
design
bar
evidentiary
hearings
diligent
prisoners
meritorious
claims
prosecution
conduct
went
undetected
state
see
indication
congress
language
intended
remove
distinction
prisoner
fault
one
commonwealth
argues
reading
failed
develop
premised
fault
empties
ii
meaning
treat
prisoner
lack
diligence
state
prerequisite
application
commonwealth
contends
renders
nullity
statute
diligence
provision
requiring
prisoner
show
factual
predicate
claim
previously
discovered
exercise
due
diligence
ii
disagree
commonwealth
misconceives
inquiry
mandated
opening
clause
question
whether
facts
discovered
instead
whether
prisoner
diligent
efforts
purpose
fault
component
failed
ensure
prisoner
undertakes
diligent
search
evidence
diligence
purposes
opening
clause
depends
upon
whether
prisoner
made
reasonable
attempt
light
information
available
time
investigate
pursue
claims
state
depend
commonwealth
upon
whether
efforts
successful
though
lack
diligence
bar
evidentiary
hearing
efforts
discover
facts
vain
see
ii
convincing
claim
innocence
see
prisoner
neglected
rights
state
need
satisfy
conditions
statute
later
reference
diligence
pertains
cases
facts
discovered
whether
diligence
important
respect
ii
bears
close
resemblance
applies
new
rule
available
time
earlier
proceedings
cf
gutierrez
ada
slip
ords
people
known
companions
cf
also
locke
slip
two
parallel
provisions
congress
given
prisoners
fall
within
opening
clause
opportunity
obtain
evidentiary
hearing
legal
factual
basis
claims
exist
time
proceedings
persuaded
commonwealth
argument
anything
less
understanding
opening
clause
contrary
aedpa
purpose
principles
comity
finality
federalism
doubt
congress
intended
aedpa
advance
doctrines
federal
habeas
corpus
principles
must
inform
shape
historic
still
vital
relation
mutual
respect
common
purpose
existing
federal
courts
keeping
delicate
balance
careful
limit
scope
federal
intrusion
state
criminal
adjudications
safeguard
interest
integrity
criminal
collateral
proceedings
see
coleman
thompson
case
federalism
concerns
respect
federal
courts
owe
procedural
rules
reviewing
claims
state
prisoners
federal
habeas
corpus
mccleskey
zant
doctrines
procedural
default
abuse
writ
designed
lessen
injury
state
results
reexamination
state
conviction
ground
state
opportunity
address
prior
appropriate
time
doctrines
seek
vindicate
state
interest
finality
criminal
judgments
consistent
principles
give
effect
congress
intent
avoid
unneeded
evidentiary
hearings
federal
habeas
corpus
recognizing
statute
equate
prisoners
exercise
diligence
pursuing
claims
principles
exhaustion
premised
upon
recognition
congress
state
judiciaries
duty
competence
vindicate
rights
secured
constitution
state
criminal
proceedings
diligence
require
usual
case
prisoner
minimum
seek
evidentiary
hearing
state
manner
prescribed
state
law
comity
dictates
prisoner
alleges
continued
confinement
state
conviction
violates
federal
law
state
courts
first
opportunity
review
claim
provide
necessary
relief
boerckel
state
courts
rightful
opportunity
adjudicate
federal
rights
prisoner
must
diligent
developing
record
presenting
possible
claims
constitutional
error
prisoner
fails
contributing
absence
full
fair
adjudication
state
prohibits
evidentiary
hearing
develop
relevant
claims
federal
unless
statute
stringent
requirements
met
federal
courts
sitting
habeas
alternative
forum
trying
facts
issues
prisoner
made
insufficient
effort
pursue
state
proceedings
yet
comity
served
saying
prisoner
failed
develop
factual
basis
claim
unable
develop
claim
state
despite
diligent
effort
circumstance
evidentiary
hearing
barred
iii
apply
statutory
test
lack
diligence
relevant
stages
state
proceedings
prisoner
failed
develop
facts
opening
clause
excused
showing
compliance
balance
subsection
requirements
find
lack
diligence
one
three
claims
two
petitioner
exercise
diligence
required
preserve
claim
nondisclosure
cruse
psychiatric
report
contravention
brady
maryland
report
concluded
cruse
ha
little
recollection
murders
kellers
vague
memories
intoxicated
alcohol
marijuana
time
app
report
prepared
september
petitioner
tried
yet
mentioned
petitioner
filed
federal
habeas
petition
attached
copy
report
petitioner
explained
investigator
federal
habeas
counsel
discovered
report
cruse
file
state
habeas
counsel
seen
reviewed
file
state
habeas
counsel
averred
follows
prior
filing
petitioner
habeas
corpus
petition
virginia
reviewed
cumberland
county
files
petitioner
jeffrey
cruse
reviewed
attached
psychiatric
evaluation
jeffrey
cruse
recollection
seeing
report
cruse
file
examined
file
given
contents
report
confident
remember
trial
satisfied
explanation
late
discovery
repeated
references
psychiatric
mental
health
report
transcript
cruse
sentencing
proceeding
copy
petitioner
state
habeas
counsel
attached
state
habeas
petition
filed
virginia
transcript
reveals
cruse
attorney
described
report
details
alerted
counsel
possible
brady
claim
cruse
attorney
said
psychiatric
report
point
cruse
significantly
depressed
suffered
post
traumatic
stress
symptoms
include
nightmares
sleeplessness
sobbing
reddening
face
severe
depression
flash
backs
psychological
report
overwhelmed
feelings
guilt
shame
actions
numb
trying
suppress
feelings
feelings
pain
sadness
description
accords
contents
psychiatric
report
diagnosed
cruse
suffering
stress
disorder
cruse
recurrent
nightmares
visualizes
face
woman
killed
attempting
describe
nightmare
breaks
openly
tears
face
reddens
continues
feel
worthless
person
hope
future
thinking
suicide
constantly
describe
inability
sleep
often
tossing
turning
waking
feeling
fatigued
day
described
neurovegetative
symptoms
major
depression
nightmares
recurrent
nature
murders
transcript
put
petitioner
state
habeas
counsel
notice
report
existence
possible
materiality
sole
indication
counsel
made
effort
investigate
report
october
letter
prosecutor
counsel
requested
reports
physical
mental
examinations
scientific
tests
experiments
conducted
connection
investigation
offense
including
limited
psychological
test
polygraph
examinations
performed
upon
prosecution
witness
documents
referring
relating
tests
prosecution
declined
requests
absent
order
appears
counsel
made
efforts
find
specific
report
mentioned
cruse
attorney
given
knowledge
report
existence
potential
importance
diligent
attorney
done
counsel
failure
investigate
references
anything
cursory
manner
triggers
opening
clause
hold
failure
develop
factual
basis
brady
claim
state
must
determine
requirements
balance
satisfied
petitioner
failure
excused
subparagraph
conditions
hearing
upon
showing
clear
convincing
evidence
reasonable
factfinder
found
petitioner
guilty
capital
murder
alleged
constitutional
error
petitioner
concedes
make
showing
see
brief
petitioner
case
presented
us
premise
reasons
affirm
appeals
judgment
barring
evidentiary
hearing
claim
conclude
petitioner
met
burden
showing
diligent
efforts
develop
facts
supporting
juror
bias
prosecutorial
misconduct
claims
collateral
proceedings
virginia
petitioner
claims
based
two
questions
posed
jurors
trial
judge
voir
dire
first
judge
asked
prospective
jurors
related
following
people
may
called
witnesses
read
jurors
list
names
one
deputy
sheriff
claude
meinhard
bonnie
stinnett
later
become
jury
foreperson
divorced
meinhard
marriage
four
children
stinnett
remained
silent
indicating
answer
meinhard
officer
investigated
crime
scene
interrogated
cruse
later
become
prosecution
witness
trial
reading
names
attorneys
involved
case
including
one
prosecutors
robert
woodson
judge
asked
member
immediate
family
ever
represented
aforementioned
attorneys
stinnett
said
nothing
despite
fact
woodson
represented
divorce
meinhard
app
affidavit
provided
federal
habeas
proceedings
stinnett
claimed
respond
judge
first
question
consider
related
claude
meinhard
voir
dire
marriage
ended
longer
related
woodson
earlier
representation
stinnett
explained
follows
claude
divorced
divorce
uncontested
woodson
drew
papers
divorce
completed
since
neither
claude
contesting
anything
think
woodson
represented
either
one
us
woodson
provided
affidavit
admitted
aware
juror
bonnie
stinnett
deputy
sheriff
claude
meinhard
aware
divorced
time
woodson
stated
however
mind
people
related
marriage
longer
related
marriage
ends
divorce
ibid
woodson
also
recollection
involved
private
attorney
divorce
proceedings
claude
meinhard
bonnie
stinnett
explained
hatever
involvement
divorce
time
trial
completely
forgotten
even
stinnett
correct
technical
literal
interpretation
question
relating
meinhard
silence
first
question
asked
suggest
finder
fact
unwillingness
forthcoming
turn
bear
veracity
explanation
disclosing
woodson
attorney
stinnett
failure
divulge
material
information
response
second
question
misleading
matter
fact
interpretation
woodson
acted
counsel
meinhard
divorce
coupled
woodson
reticence
omissions
whole
disclose
need
evidentiary
hearing
may
petitioner
establish
stinnett
impartial
see
smith
phillips
woodson
silence
infected
trial
deny
due
process
see
donnelly
dechristoforo
ordering
evidentiary
hearing
juror
bias
prosecutorial
misconduct
claims
district
concluded
factual
basis
claims
reasonably
available
petitioner
counsel
state
habeas
proceedings
appeals
vacated
judgment
district
dismissed
petition
appeals
affirmed
theory
state
habeas
counsel
discovered
stinnett
relationship
meinhard
woodson
see
disagree
appeals
point
trial
record
contains
evidence
put
reasonable
attorney
notice
stinnett
deliberate
omission
material
information
state
habeas
counsel
attempt
investigate
petitioner
jury
though
prompted
concerns
different
juror
app
counsel
filed
motion
expert
services
virginia
alleging
irregularities
improprieties
omissions
exist
ed
respect
empaneling
sic
jury
based
suspicions
counsel
requested
funding
investigator
examine
circumstances
relating
empanelment
jury
jury
consideration
case
ibid
commonwealth
opposed
motion
virginia
denied
dismissed
habeas
petition
depriving
petitioner
opportunity
investigate
virginia
denial
motion
understandable
light
petitioner
vague
allegations
vagueness
fault
petitioner
counsel
reason
believe
stinnett
married
meinhard
represented
woodson
underdevelopment
matters
attributable
stinnett
woodson
anyone
suggest
state
obligation
pay
investigation
yet
undeveloped
claims
prisoner
made
reasonable
effort
discover
claims
commence
continue
state
proceedings
bar
developing
federal
appeals
held
state
habeas
counsel
diligent
petitioner
investigator
federal
habeas
discovered
relationships
upon
interviewing
two
jurors
referred
passing
stinnett
bonnie
meinhard
see
brief
petitioner
investigator
later
confirmed
stinnett
prior
marriage
meinhard
checking
cumberland
county
public
records
see
documents
supporting
petitioner
sixth
amendment
claims
matter
public
record
since
stinnett
divorce
became
final
indeed
petitioner
federal
habeas
counsel
located
documents
little
reason
think
state
habeas
counsel
done
well
surprised
say
least
district
familiar
standards
trial
practice
hold
cases
diligent
counsel
must
check
public
records
containing
personal
information
pertaining
every
juror
stinnett
woodson
silence
basis
investigation
stinnett
marriage
history
section
apply
petitioner
related
claims
juror
bias
prosecutorial
misconduct
note
commonwealth
argued
petitioner
sought
relief
state
discovered
factual
bases
claims
time
appointment
federal
habeas
counsel
july
filing
federal
habeas
petition
november
indigent
petitioner
days
following
appointment
state
habeas
counsel
file
petition
virginia
code
ann
state
habeas
counsel
appointed
august
year
petitioner
investigator
federal
habeas
uncovered
information
regarding
stinnett
woodson
state
postconviction
relief
longer
available
time
facts
came
light
futile
petitioner
return
virginia
courts
circumstances
though
state
courts
opportunity
consider
new
claims
petitioner
said
failed
develop
state
reason
neglected
pursue
remedies
available
virginia
law
analysis
suffice
establish
cause
procedural
default
petitioner
may
committed
presenting
claims
virginia
courts
first
instance
questions
regarding
standard
determining
prejudice
petitioner
must
establish
obtain
relief
claims
addressed
appeals
district
course
proceedings
courts
light
cases
smith
supra
remedy
allegations
juror
partiality
hearing
defendant
opportunity
prove
actual
bias
take
due
account
district
earlier
decision
grant
evidentiary
hearing
based
part
belief
juror
stinnett
deliberately
failed
tell
truth
voir
dire
williams
netherland
civ
action
ed
apr
app
iv
petitioner
alleges
commonwealth
failed
disclose
informal
plea
agreement
cruse
appeals
rejected
claim
merits
unnecessary
reach
question
whether
permit
hearing
claim
decision
appeals
affirmed
part
reversed
part
case
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered