greene
mcelroy
argued
april
decided
june
petitioner
aeronautical
engineer
general
manager
private
corporation
engaged
developing
producing
armed
forces
goods
involving
military
secrets
contracts
requiring
corporation
exclude
premises
persons
security
clearances
regulations
promulgated
secretary
defense
without
explicit
authorization
either
president
congress
administrative
hearings
denied
access
much
information
adverse
opportunity
confront
witnesses
petitioner
deprived
security
clearance
grounds
alleged
communistic
associations
sympathies
consequence
corporation
discharged
unable
obtain
employment
aeronautical
engineer
sued
judgment
declaring
revocation
security
clearance
unlawful
void
order
restraining
secretaries
armed
forces
acting
pursuant
held
absence
explicit
authorization
either
president
congress
secretaries
armed
forces
authorized
deprive
petitioner
job
proceeding
afforded
safeguards
confrontation
pp
neither
executive
order
executive
order
empowers
executive
agency
fashion
security
programs
whereby
persons
deprived
civilian
employment
opportunity
continued
activity
chosen
professions
without
accorded
chance
challenge
effectively
evidence
testimony
upon
adverse
security
determination
might
rest
pp
neither
national
security
act
armed
services
procurement
act
even
read
conjunction
making
crime
communicate
unauthorized
persons
information
concerning
cryptographic
intelligence
activities
making
crime
officer
employee
communicate
classified
information
agents
foreign
governments
officers
members
communist
organizations
constitutes
authorization
create
elaborate
clearance
program
persons
may
seriously
restrained
employment
opportunities
denial
clearance
without
safeguards
confrontation
pp
congressional
ratification
security
clearance
procedures
implied
continued
appropriation
funds
finance
aspects
program
fashioned
department
defense
pp
area
questionable
constitutionality
hold
person
may
deprived
right
follow
chosen
profession
without
full
hearings
accusers
may
confronted
neither
president
congress
explicitly
authorized
procedure
pp
carl
berueffy
argued
cause
filed
brief
petitioner
assistant
attorney
general
doub
argued
cause
respondents
brief
solicitor
general
rankin
samuel
slade
bernard
cedarbaum
david
shapiro
filed
brief
american
civil
liberties
union
amicus
curiae
urging
reversal
chief
justice
warren
delivered
opinion
case
involves
validity
government
revocation
security
clearance
granted
petitioner
aeronautical
engineer
employed
private
manufacturer
produced
goods
armed
services
petitioner
discharged
employment
solely
consequence
revocation
access
classified
information
required
nature
job
discharge
petitioner
unable
secure
employment
aeronautical
engineer
practical
purposes
field
endeavor
closed
petitioner
vice
president
general
manager
engineering
research
corporation
erco
business
devoted
primarily
developing
manufacturing
various
mechanical
electronic
products
began
employment
soon
graduation
guggenheim
school
aeronautics
except
brief
leave
absence
stayed
firm
discharge
first
employed
junior
engineer
draftsman
excellence
work
eventually
became
chief
executive
officer
firm
career
erco
credited
expedited
development
complicated
electronic
flight
simulator
design
rocket
launcher
produced
erco
long
used
navy
war
ii
period
petitioner
given
security
clearances
three
occasions
required
nature
projects
undertaken
erco
various
armed
services
november
however
force
personnel
security
board
psb
advised
erco
company
clearances
access
classified
information
jeopardy
tentative
decision
deny
petitioner
access
classified
department
defense
information
revoke
clearance
security
reasons
erco
invited
respond
notification
corporation
president
informed
psb
petitioner
taken
extended
furlough
due
board
action
erco
executive
also
stated
opinion
petitioner
loyal
discreet
citizen
absence
denied
firm
services
outstanding
engineer
administrative
executive
december
petitioner
informed
board
decided
access
contract
work
information
erco
inimical
best
interests
accordingly
psb
revoked
petitioner
clearances
informed
seek
hearing
industrial
employment
review
board
ierb
took
course
prior
hearing
petitioner
received
letter
informing
psb
action
based
information
indicating
associated
communists
visited
officials
russian
embassy
attended
dinner
given
allegedly
communist
front
organization
january
petitioner
counsel
appeared
ierb
questioned
detail
concerning
background
information
disclosed
ierb
letter
response
numerous
searching
questions
explained
substance
specific
suspect
persons
said
associated
actually
friends
explained
detail
first
marriage
lasted
wife
held
views
concur
friendly
associates
persons
little
common
stated
basic
disagreements
prime
reasons
marriage
ended
failure
attributed
wife
attendance
dinner
membership
bookshop
association
purportedly
front
organization
presence
home
communist
publications
denied
categorically
ever
communist
spoke
length
dislike
theory
government
object
common
ownership
property
lastly
petitioner
explained
visits
persons
various
foreign
embassies
including
russian
embassy
made
connection
attempts
sell
erco
products
governments
petitioner
witnesses
included
executives
erco
number
military
officers
worked
petitioner
past
corroborated
many
petitioner
statements
testified
substance
loyal
discreet
citizen
executives
erco
whose
right
clearance
never
challenged
corroborated
petitioner
testimony
concerning
reasons
visiting
russian
embassy
government
presented
witnesses
obvious
however
questions
posed
petitioner
witnesses
board
relied
confidential
reports
never
made
available
petitioner
reports
apparently
compilations
statements
taken
various
persons
contacted
investigatory
agency
petitioner
opportunity
confront
question
persons
whose
statements
reflected
adversely
confront
government
investigators
took
statements
moreover
seemed
evident
board
never
questioned
investigators
never
seen
persons
whose
statements
subject
reports
january
ierb
basis
testimony
given
hearing
confidential
reports
reversed
action
psb
informed
petitioner
erco
petitioner
authorized
work
secret
contract
work
march
secretary
defense
abolished
psb
ierb
directed
secretaries
three
armed
services
establish
regional
industrial
personnel
security
boards
coordinate
industrial
security
program
secretaries
also
instructed
establish
uniform
standards
criteria
procedures
cases
pending
psb
ierb
referred
new
boards
interim
period
abolishment
old
program
implementation
new
one
secretaries
considered
charged
administering
clearance
activities
previously
stated
criteria
april
respondent
anderson
secretary
navy
wrote
erco
reviewed
petitioner
case
concluded
petitioner
continued
access
navy
classified
security
information
inconsistent
best
interests
national
security
hearing
preceded
notification
requested
erco
exclude
petitioner
part
plants
factories
sites
classified
navy
projects
carried
bar
access
navy
classified
information
also
advised
corporation
petitioner
case
referred
secretary
defense
recommendation
ierb
decision
january
overruled
erco
choice
comply
request
led
petitioner
discharge
erco
informed
navy
occurred
requested
opportunity
discuss
matter
view
petitioner
importance
firm
navy
replied
far
navy
department
concerned
discussion
problem
time
serve
useful
purpose
petitioner
asked
reconsideration
decision
october
navy
wrote
stating
requested
eastern
industrial
personnel
security
board
eipsb
accept
jurisdiction
arrive
final
determination
concerning
petitioner
status
various
letters
subsequently
exchanged
petitioner
counsel
eipsb
resulted
finally
generalized
charges
quoted
margin
incorporating
information
previously
discussed
petitioner
hearing
ierb
april
one
year
secretary
took
action
two
days
thereafter
petitioner
presented
case
eipsb
detail
hearing
began
statement
chairman
included
following
passage
transcript
made
hearing
include
material
file
case
include
reports
investigation
conducted
federal
bureau
investigation
investigative
agencies
confidential
neither
contain
information
concerning
identity
confidential
informants
information
reveal
source
confidential
evidence
transcript
contain
statement
reasons
answer
thereto
testimony
actually
taken
hearing
petitioner
response
question
stated
outset
hearing
employed
salary
per
year
architectural
draftsman
receiving
per
year
vice
president
general
manager
erco
later
explained
discharge
erco
unsuccessfully
tried
obtain
employment
aeronautics
field
barricaded
lack
clearance
petitioner
subjected
intense
examination
similar
experienced
ierb
course
examination
board
injected
new
subjects
inquiry
made
evident
relying
various
investigatory
reports
statements
confidential
informants
made
available
petitioner
petitioner
reiterated
great
detail
explanations
previously
given
ierb
subjected
intense
however
concerning
reports
agreed
views
held
petitioner
presented
number
witnesses
testified
loyal
spoken
approvingly
economic
system
valuable
engineer
made
valuable
significant
contributions
country
war
efforts
world
war
ii
korean
war
soon
conclusion
hearing
eipsb
notified
petitioner
affirmed
secretary
action
decided
granting
clearance
petitioner
access
classified
information
clearly
consistent
interests
national
security
petitioner
requested
furnished
detailed
statement
findings
supporting
board
decision
informed
however
security
considerations
prohibited
disclosure
september
petitioner
requested
review
industrial
personnel
security
review
board
march
almost
three
years
secretary
action
nearly
one
year
second
hearing
received
letter
director
office
industrial
personnel
security
review
informing
eipsb
found
petitioner
associated
closely
wife
friends
knowing
active
behalf
sympathized
communist
party
part
period
petitioner
maintained
sympathetic
association
number
officials
russian
embassy
period
petitioner
political
views
similar
wife
petitioner
member
suspect
bookshop
association
invested
money
suspect
radio
station
attended
suspect
dinner
occasion
communist
publications
home
petitioner
credibility
witness
proceedings
doubtful
letter
also
stated
doubts
concerning
petitioner
credibility
affected
board
evaluation
trustworthiness
trustworthy
persons
afforded
access
classified
information
eipsb
determination
affirmed
eipsb
decision
petitioner
filed
complaint
district
district
columbia
asking
declaration
revocation
unlawful
void
order
restraining
respondents
acting
pursuant
also
asked
order
requiring
respondents
advise
erco
clearance
revocation
void
following
affirmance
eipsb
order
industrial
personnel
review
board
petitioner
moved
summary
judgment
district
government
dismissal
complaint
summary
judgment
district
granted
government
motion
summary
judgment
supp
appeals
affirmed
disposition
app
appeals
recognized
petitioner
suffered
substantial
harm
clearance
revocation
view
petitioner
suit
presented
justiciable
controversy
controversy
courts
finally
effectively
decide
conclusion
followed
appeals
reasoning
executive
department
alone
competent
evaluate
competing
considerations
exist
determining
persons
afforded
security
clearances
also
rejected
petitioner
claim
deprived
livelihood
without
traditional
safeguards
required
due
process
law
confrontation
accusers
access
confidential
reports
used
determine
fitness
central
determination
unwillingness
order
government
choose
disclosing
identities
informants
giving
petitioner
clearance
petitioner
contends
action
department
defense
barring
access
classified
information
basis
statements
confidential
informants
made
investigators
authorized
either
congress
president
denied
liberty
property
without
due
process
law
contravention
fifth
amendment
alleged
property
petitioner
employment
alleged
liberty
petitioner
freedom
practice
chosen
profession
respondents
admit
must
revocation
security
clearance
caused
petitioner
lose
job
erco
seriously
affected
destroyed
ability
obtain
employment
aeronautics
field
although
right
hold
specific
private
employment
follow
chosen
profession
free
unreasonable
governmental
interference
comes
within
liberty
property
concepts
fifth
amendment
dent
west
virginia
schware
board
bar
examiners
peters
hobby
concurring
opinion
cf
slochower
board
education
truax
raich
allgeyer
louisiana
powell
pennsylvania
respondents
contend
admitted
interferences
occurred
indirect
necessary
governmental
action
protect
integrity
secret
information
hence
unreasonable
constitute
deprivations
within
meaning
amendment
alternatively
respondents
urge
even
petitioner
restrained
enjoyment
constitutionally
protected
rights
accorded
due
process
law
permitted
utilize
procedural
safeguards
consonant
effective
clearance
program
administration
identity
informants
statements
kept
secret
insure
unimpaired
flow
government
information
concerning
subversive
conduct
view
conclusion
case
decided
narrower
ground
authorization
find
need
determine
answers
questions
issue
see
whether
department
defense
authorized
create
industrial
security
clearance
program
affected
persons
may
lose
jobs
may
restrained
following
chosen
professions
basis
fact
determinations
concerning
fitness
clearance
made
proceedings
denied
traditional
procedural
safeguards
confrontation
prior
world
war
ii
sporadic
efforts
made
control
clearance
persons
worked
private
establishments
manufactured
materials
national
defense
report
commission
government
security
doc
sess
world
war
ii
war
department
instituted
formalized
program
obtain
discharge
war
plants
persons
engaged
sabotage
espionage
willful
activity
designed
disrupt
national
defense
program
war
department
began
require
contractors
given
access
classified
information
sign
secrecy
agreements
required
consent
employees
permitted
access
top
secret
secret
information
outset
armed
service
administered
industrial
clearance
program
later
psb
ierb
established
department
defense
secretaries
armed
services
administer
centralized
program
ibid
confusion
existed
concerning
criteria
procedures
employed
boards
ibid
eventually
generalized
procedures
established
approval
secretaries
provided
part
ierb
hearing
conducted
manner
protect
disclosure
information
affecting
national
security
tending
compromise
investigative
sources
methods
see
procedures
governing
appeals
industrial
employment
review
board
dated
november
note
supra
abolition
boards
establishment
ipsb
various
new
sets
procedures
promulgated
likewise
provided
information
tending
compromise
investigative
sources
methods
indentity
confidential
informants
programs
procedures
established
directives
issued
secretary
defense
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
none
creature
statute
executive
order
issued
president
respondents
maintain
congressional
authorization
president
fashion
program
denies
security
clearance
persons
basis
confidential
information
individuals
opportunity
confront
test
unnecessary
president
inherent
authority
maintain
military
secrets
inviolate
respondents
argue
statutory
grant
power
necessary
grant
readily
inferred
necessarily
implicit
authority
generalized
provisions
legislation
dealing
armed
services
question
must
decided
case
whether
president
inherent
power
act
whether
congress
granted
power
rather
whether
either
president
congress
exercised
power
delegated
department
defense
authority
fashion
program
certain
principles
remained
relatively
immutable
jurisprudence
one
governmental
action
seriously
injures
individual
reasonableness
action
depends
fact
findings
evidence
used
prove
government
case
must
disclosed
individual
opportunity
show
untrue
important
case
documentary
evidence
even
important
evidence
consists
testimony
individuals
whose
memory
might
faulty
fact
might
perjurers
persons
motivated
malice
vindictiveness
intolerance
prejudice
jealousy
formalized
protections
requirements
confrontation
ancient
roots
find
expression
sixth
amendment
provides
criminal
cases
accused
shall
enjoy
right
confronted
witnesses
zealous
protect
rights
erosion
spoken
criminal
cases
mattox
kirby
motes
oliver
also
types
cases
administrative
regulatory
actions
scrutiny
southern
virginia
ohio
bell
telephone
public
utilities
commission
morgan
carter
kubler
reilly
pinkus
pointed
congress
ignored
fundamental
requirements
enacting
regulatory
legislation
joint
committee
mcgrath
concurring
opinion
professor
wigmore
commenting
importance
treatise
wigmore
evidence
ed
two
centuries
past
policy
system
evidence
regard
necessity
testing
vital
feature
law
belief
safeguard
testing
value
human
statements
comparable
furnished
conviction
statement
unless
special
exception
used
testimony
probed
sublimated
test
found
increasing
strength
lengthening
experience
must
determine
background
whether
president
congress
delegated
department
defense
authority
traditional
safeguards
industrial
security
clearance
program
operate
injure
individuals
substantially
denying
opportunity
follow
chosen
private
professions
respondents
cite
two
executive
orders
believe
show
presidential
delegation
first
exec
order
fed
reg
entitled
prescribing
regulations
establishing
minimum
standards
classification
transmission
handling
departments
agencies
executive
branch
official
information
requires
safeguarding
interest
security
provided
relevant
part
part
dissemination
classified
security
information
general
person
shall
entitled
knowledge
possession
access
classified
security
information
solely
virtue
office
position
classified
security
information
shall
discussed
presence
unauthorized
persons
latter
shall
permitted
inspect
access
information
head
agency
shall
establish
system
controlling
dissemination
classified
security
information
adequate
needs
agency
limitations
dissemination
within
executive
branch
dissemination
classified
security
information
shall
limited
persons
whose
official
duties
require
knowledge
information
special
measures
shall
employed
limit
dissemination
top
secret
security
information
absolute
minimum
portion
top
secret
security
information
necessary
proper
planning
appropriate
action
organizational
unit
individual
shall
released
unit
individual
outside
executive
branch
classified
security
information
shall
disseminated
outside
executive
branch
person
agency
access
thereto
knowledge
thereof
except
conditions
channels
authorized
head
disseminating
agency
even
though
person
agency
may
solely
partly
responsible
production
sec
accountability
dissemination
dissemination
outside
executive
branch
classified
defense
information
shall
disseminated
outside
executive
branch
except
conditions
channels
authorized
head
disseminating
department
agency
even
though
person
agency
dissemination
information
proposed
made
may
solely
partly
responsible
production
turning
legislative
enactments
might
deemed
delegating
authority
department
defense
fashion
programs
persons
may
seriously
restrained
employment
opportunities
denial
clearance
without
safeguards
confrontation
note
government
assertion
made
brief
ith
petitioner
contention
industrial
security
program
explicitly
authorized
statute
may
readily
agree
first
proffered
statute
national
security
act
amended
et
seq
act
created
department
defense
gave
secretary
defense
secretaries
armed
services
authority
administer
departments
nowhere
act
amendments
found
specific
authority
create
clearance
program
similar
one
effect
another
act
cited
respondents
armed
service
procurement
act
amended
provides
purchases
contracts
property
services
covered
chapter
shall
made
formal
advertising
however
head
agency
may
negotiate
purchase
contract
purchase
contract
property
services
whose
procurement
determines
publicly
disclosed
character
ingredients
components
system
contracting
may
used
subject
limitation
subject
subsections
head
agency
may
negotiating
contracts
section
title
make
kind
contract
considers
promote
best
interests
although
statutes
make
apparent
congress
recognizes
existence
military
secrets
hardly
constitute
authorization
create
elaborate
clearance
program
embodies
procedures
traditionally
believed
inadequate
protect
affected
persons
lastly
government
urges
refuse
adopt
inferred
authorization
reasoning
nevertheless
congressional
ratification
apparent
continued
appropriation
funds
finance
aspects
program
fashioned
department
defense
respondents
refer
us
hearings
house
committee
appropriations
department
defense
appropriations
sess
hearings
committee
asked
approve
appropriation
funds
finance
program
reimbursement
lost
wages
made
employees
government
contractors
temporarily
denied
later
granted
security
clearance
apparently
reimbursements
made
prior
time
general
appropriations
although
specific
appropriation
eventually
made
purpose
conceivably
constitute
ratification
hearing
procedures
procedures
way
involved
special
reimbursement
program
respondents
argument
delegation
resolves
following
president
general
terms
authorized
department
defense
create
procedures
restrict
dissemination
classified
information
apparently
acquiesced
elaborate
program
established
secretary
defense
even
application
program
results
restraints
traditional
freedoms
without
use
procedural
protections
similarly
congress
although
enacted
specific
legislation
relating
clearance
procedures
utilized
industrial
workers
acquiesced
existing
department
defense
program
ratified
specifically
appropriating
funds
finance
one
aspect
acquiescence
implied
ratification
enough
show
delegation
authority
take
actions
within
area
questionable
constitutionality
might
agree
respondents
delegation
shown
many
circumstances
government
freedom
act
clear
congress
president
provided
general
standards
action
acquiesced
administrative
interpretation
delegation
may
inferred
thus
even
absence
specific
delegation
difficulty
finding
department
defense
authorized
fashion
apply
industrial
clearance
program
affords
affected
persons
safeguards
confrontation
case
present
situation
deal
substantial
restraints
employment
opportunities
numerous
persons
imposed
manner
conflict
notions
fair
procedures
asked
judge
whether
context
security
clearance
cases
person
may
deprived
right
follow
chosen
profession
without
full
hearings
accusers
may
confronted
must
made
clear
president
congress
within
respective
constitutional
powers
specifically
decided
imposed
procedures
necessary
warranted
authorized
use
cf
watkins
scull
virginia
decisions
assumed
acquiescence
kent
dulles
peters
hobby
ex
parte
endo
must
made
explicitly
assure
individuals
deprived
cherished
rights
procedures
actually
authorized
see
peters
hobby
supra
also
explicit
action
especially
areas
doubtful
constitutionality
requires
careful
purposeful
consideration
responsible
enacting
implementing
laws
without
explicit
action
lawmakers
decisions
great
constitutional
import
effect
relegated
default
administrators
system
government
endowed
authority
decide
administrative
action
raised
serious
constitutional
problems
assumed
congress
president
intended
afford
affected
action
traditional
safeguards
due
process
see
japanese
immigrant
case
dismuke
ex
parte
endo
american
power
securities
exchange
hannegon
esquire
wong
yang
sung
mcgrath
cf
anniston
mfg
davis
rumely
cases
reflect
concern
traditional
forms
fair
procedure
restricted
implication
without
explicit
action
nation
lawmakers
even
areas
possible
constitution
presents
inhibition
instant
case
petitioner
work
opportunities
severely
limited
basis
fact
determination
rendered
hearing
failed
comport
traditional
ideas
fair
procedure
type
hearing
product
administrative
decision
explicitly
authorized
either
congress
president
whether
procedures
circumstances
comport
constitution
decide
decide
whether
president
inherent
authority
create
program
whether
congressional
action
necessary
limits
executive
legislative
authority
may
decide
absence
explicit
authorization
either
president
congress
respondents
empowered
deprive
petitioner
job
proceeding
afforded
safeguards
confrontation
accordingly
judgment
reversed
case
remanded
district
proceedings
inconsistent
herewith
ordered
footnotes
erco
classified
contract
work
various
services
connection
classified
research
project
navy
entered
security
agreement
undertook
provide
maintain
system
security
controls
within
organization
accordance
requirements
department
defense
industrial
security
manual
manual
turn
provided
paragraphs
contractor
shall
exclude
imply
dismissal
separation
employee
part
plants
factories
sites
work
military
department
performed
person
persons
secretary
military
department
concerned
duly
authorized
representative
interest
security
may
designate
writing
individual
shall
permitted
access
classified
matter
unless
cleared
government
contractor
case
may
specified
following
subparagraphs
given
access
matter
extent
clearance
psb
created
pursuant
interim
agreement
dated
october
army
navy
air
force
pursuant
memorandum
agreement
provost
marshal
general
air
provost
marshal
dated
march
board
one
representative
military
departments
functions
grant
deny
clearance
employment
aeronautical
classified
contract
work
consent
required
suspend
individuals
whose
continued
employment
considered
inimical
security
interests
employment
classified
work
report
commission
government
security
doc
sess
established
procedures
approved
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
see
procedures
governing
force
personnel
security
board
dated
june
ierb
board
given
jurisdiction
hear
review
appeals
decisions
psb
charter
dated
november
signed
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
contemplated
afford
hearings
persons
denied
clearance
see
procedures
governing
appeals
industrial
employment
review
board
dated
november
letter
read
part
period
years
near
washington
closely
sympathetically
associated
persons
reported
members
communist
party
period
entertained
visited
home
military
representatives
russian
embassy
washington
attended
social
functions
period
russian
embassy
washington
april
attended
southern
conference
human
welfare
third
annual
dinner
statler
hotel
washington
cited
communist
front
organization
congressional
committee
activities
boards
abolished
pursuant
memorandum
march
issued
secretary
defense
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
chairman
munitions
board
provided
part
department
army
navy
air
force
shall
establish
number
geographical
regions
within
seems
appropriate
region
shall
established
within
region
industrial
personnel
security
board
board
shall
consist
two
separate
distinct
divisions
screening
division
appeal
division
equal
representation
departments
army
navy
air
force
division
appeal
division
shall
jurisdiction
hear
appeals
decision
screening
division
decisions
shall
determined
majority
vote
shall
final
subject
reconsideration
motion
request
appellant
good
cause
shown
request
secretary
military
department
memorandum
secretary
defense
also
provided
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
shall
within
thirty
days
establish
geographical
regions
develop
joint
uniform
standards
criteria
detailed
procedures
implement
program
developing
standards
criteria
procedures
full
consideration
shall
given
rights
individuals
consistent
security
requirements
approval
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
standards
criteria
procedures
shall
govern
operations
board
memorandum
provided
cases
pending
force
personnel
security
board
industrial
employment
review
board
shall
referred
action
order
appropriate
industrial
personnel
security
board
memorandum
provided
criteria
governing
actions
industrial
employment
review
board
dated
november
revised
november
approved
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
shall
govern
security
clearances
industrial
facilities
industrial
personnel
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
time
uniform
criteria
established
connection
paragraph
memorandum
see
note
supra
chairman
board
erco
colonel
henry
berliner
later
testified
affidavit
follows
year
many
years
previous
thereto
principal
stockholder
engineering
research
corporation
corporation
principal
place
business
riverdale
maryland
also
chairman
board
principal
executive
officer
corporation
acquainted
william
lewis
greene
prior
month
april
greene
charge
engineering
general
manager
engineering
research
corporation
employed
corporation
since
progress
company
consistent
one
valued
valuable
employees
responsible
much
work
engineering
research
corporation
april
company
received
letter
secretary
navy
advising
us
clearance
denied
greene
advising
us
necessary
bar
access
plant
view
position
company
work
light
denial
clearance
navy
result
necessary
company
discharge
reason
greene
discharge
absence
letter
referred
continued
employment
engineering
research
corporation
indefinitely
president
erco
wrote
secretary
navy
follows
honorable
anderson
secretary
navy
washington
dear
secretary
receipt
acknowledged
letter
april
state
reviewed
case
history
file
william
lewis
greene
concluded
continued
access
navy
classified
security
information
inconsistent
best
interests
national
security
request
company
exclude
greene
plants
factories
sites
bar
information
interests
protecting
navy
classified
projects
classified
security
information
accordance
request
please
advised
since
receipt
letter
company
excluded
greene
part
plants
factories
sites
barred
access
classified
security
information
information
greene
tendered
resignation
officer
corporation
left
plant
shall
contact
status
clarified
although
yet
formally
accepted
resignation
greene
vice
president
company
charge
engineering
knowledge
experience
executive
ability
proven
inestimable
value
past
loss
services
time
serious
blow
company
operations
accordingly
like
privilege
personal
conference
discuss
matter
furthermore
state
referring
case
secretary
defense
recommending
industrial
employment
review
board
decision
january
overruled
appropriate
like
much
privilege
discussing
matter
secretary
defense
please
accept
thanks
official
courtesies
position
extend
respectfully
engineering
research
corporation
wells
may
pursuant
memorandum
secretary
defense
dated
march
see
note
supra
secretaries
military
departments
established
regional
industrial
personnel
security
boards
governed
generalized
standards
criteria
procedures
specifications
contained
letter
petitioner
counsel
dated
april
sent
nineteen
days
hearing
letter
provided
part
security
considerations
permit
disclosure
following
information
thus
far
resulted
denial
clearance
greene
subject
member
washington
book
shop
association
organization
officially
cited
attorney
general
communist
subversive
subject
first
wife
jean
hinton
greene
married
approximately
december
approximately
december
ardent
communist
greater
part
period
marriage
period
subject
first
marriage
wife
many
communist
publications
home
including
daily
worker
soviet
russia
today
fact
karl
marx
das
kapital
many
apparently
reliable
witnesses
testified
period
subject
first
marriage
personal
political
sympathies
general
accord
wife
sympathetic
towards
russia
followed
communist
party
line
presented
arguments
apparently
influenced
jean
wild
theories
etc
nothing
record
establishes
witness
testified
hearing
subjects
everything
record
indicates
done
make
statements
investigative
officers
subject
invested
approximately
metropolitan
broadcasting
corporation
later
became
director
radio
station
wqqw
reliably
reported
many
stockholders
corporation
communists
news
coverage
radio
programs
station
wqqw
frequently
paralleled
communist
party
line
station
station
wgms
washington
good
music
station
petitioner
stated
invested
money
station
liked
classical
music
considered
good
investment
april
subject
wife
jean
attended
third
annual
dinner
southern
conference
human
welfare
organization
officially
cited
communist
front
dinner
also
attended
many
washington
notables
including
several
members
beginning
continuing
several
years
thereafter
subject
maintained
sympathetic
associations
various
officials
soviet
embassy
including
major
constantine
ovchinnikov
pavel
berezin
major
pavel
asseev
ilia
saraev
anatoly
golkovsky
executives
erco
noted
testified
associations
carried
secure
business
corporation
subject
frequent
sympathetic
association
vaso
syrzentic
yugoslav
embassy
syrzentic
identified
agent
international
communist
party
petitioner
testified
met
individual
connection
business
transaction
subject
contact
alexander
hess
czechoslovak
embassy
identified
agent
red
army
intelligence
charge
apparently
abandoned
adverse
finding
based
subject
maintained
close
sympathetic
association
nathan
gregory
silvermaster
william
ludwig
ullman
silvermaster
ullman
identified
members
soviet
espionage
apparatus
active
washington
silvermaster
top
economist
department
agriculture
direct
superior
petitioner
worked
department
subject
series
contacts
laughlin
currie
period
currie
also
identified
member
silvermaster
espionage
group
petitioner
met
currie
executive
offices
president
time
currie
special
assistant
president
period
subject
maintained
frequent
close
associations
many
communist
party
members
including
wife
wife
persons
apparently
friends
petitioner
substantially
period
subject
maintained
close
association
many
persons
identified
strong
supporters
communist
conspiracy
including
persons
apparently
friends
noted
information
previously
discussed
greene
hearing
industrial
employment
review
board
copy
transcript
hearing
made
available
august
last
year
petitioner
stated
affidavit
support
motion
summary
judgment
fter
discharge
engineering
research
corporation
made
every
possible
effort
secure
employment
salary
commensurate
experience
unable
work
history
field
aeronautics
spite
everything
best
position
obtain
architectural
firm
obliged
go
work
salary
per
year
basis
upon
higher
salary
justified
experience
field
particularly
useful
type
work
able
obtain
result
actions
defendants
complained
field
aeronautical
engineering
closed
instance
following
questions
asked
connection
left
wing
radio
station
petitioner
owned
stock
petitioner
acquaintanceship
alleged
subversives
petitioner
business
relationships
foreign
governments
information
greene
one
particular
individual
specifically
called
attention
fact
congressman
rankin
senator
bilbo
characterized
station
communist
station
run
communists
information
come
informant
characterized
known
reliability
refers
conversations
january
told
visited
previous
evening
become
rather
chummy
wish
comment
concerning
relationship
information
informant
characterized
one
known
reliability
told
informant
shortly
following
western
high
school
speech
remarked
probably
many
people
learn
things
russia
quoted
replying
well
hope
learn
something
good
least
wish
say
anything
information
greene
indicates
first
meet
russians
met
early
information
greene
indicating
initiative
contacts
came
berezin
information
indicating
matter
fact
sir
know
meeting
berezin
arranged
hess
hochfeld
indicated
also
information
source
identified
one
known
reliability
referring
conversation
source
hess
april
hess
stated
talking
one
harry
identified
presumed
hochfeld
harry
said
hess
young
engineer
good
friend
cause
harry
wanted
hess
set
meeting
berezin
give
us
reason
harry
might
referred
good
friend
cause
course
make
certain
assumptions
berezin
might
wanted
meet
back
december
look
statement
like
indicating
considered
good
friend
cause
course
weight
lent
assumption
fact
wife
strongly
left
became
active
communist
affairs
case
know
pass
bill
home
red
brick
house
talking
anything
unusual
house
interior
dirty
beds
house
mattresses
ever
hear
said
jean
slept
board
order
keep
common
touch
jean
home
dress
conventionally
received
guests
let
ask
conventionally
somebody
invite
dinner
home
expect
woman
wear
dress
shoes
stockings
usual
clothing
evening
expect
appear
overalls
notification
stated
security
considerations
prohibit
furnishing
appellant
detailed
statement
findings
appeal
inasmuch
entire
file
considered
comments
made
appeal
division
panel
security
matters
security
reasons
form
basis
statement
reasons
board
created
secretary
defense
february
given
power
review
adverse
decisions
rendered
regional
boards
first
time
petitioner
charged
found
untrustworthy
complaint
filed
establishment
industrial
personnel
security
review
board
see
note
supra
appeals
stated
doubt
greene
fact
injured
forced
job
paid
per
year
since
reduced
far
record
shows
working
architectural
draftsman
salary
per
year
aeronautical
engineer
considerable
experience
says
without
real
contradiction
effectively
barred
pursuit
many
aspects
profession
given
current
dependence
phases
aircraft
industry
defense
department
contracts
production
research
development
work
well
doubt
following
government
action
stigma
greater
less
degree
attached
greene
app
note
agreement
respondents
concession
petitioner
standing
bring
suit
assert
whatever
rights
may
respondents
actions
directed
petitioner
individual
caused
substantial
injuries
joint
committee
mcgrath
concurring
opinion
subject
suit
private
persons
attacked
invasion
legally
protected
right
free
arbitrary
interference
private
contractual
relationships
moreover
petitioner
right
free
unauthorized
actions
government
officials
substantially
impair
property
interests
cf
philadelphia
stimson
industrial
personnel
security
review
regulation
fed
reg
recommended
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
approved
secretary
defense
provided
release
information
personnel
program
comply
applicable
directives
pertaining
safeguarding
classified
information
handling
investigative
reports
classified
information
information
might
compromise
investigative
sources
methods
identity
confidential
informants
disclosed
contractor
contractor
employee
lawyer
representatives
person
authorized
access
information
addition
case
involving
contractor
employee
contractor
concerned
advised
final
determination
case
grant
deny
revoke
clearance
decision
suspend
clearance
granted
previously
pending
final
determination
case
contractor
given
copy
statement
reasons
issued
contractor
employee
except
written
request
contractor
employee
concerned
see
charter
industrial
employment
review
board
dated
november
note
supra
charter
force
personnel
security
board
dated
june
note
supra
memorandum
issued
secretary
defense
secretaries
army
navy
air
force
chairman
munitions
board
dated
march
notes
supra
industrial
personnel
facility
security
clearance
program
effective
may
note
supra
industrial
personnel
security
review
regulation
fed
reg
cfr
part
supp
industrial
security
manual
safeguarding
classified
information
fed
reg
fed
reg
festus
two
thousand
years
ago
reported
king
agrippa
felix
given
prisoner
named
paul
priests
elders
desired
judgment
paul
festus
reported
stated
manner
romans
deliver
man
die
accused
accusers
face
face
licence
answer
concerning
crime
laid
acts
professor
wigmore
explains
detail
emergence
principle
law
confrontation
basic
ingredients
fair
trial
wigmore
evidence
ed
see
national
security
individual
freedom
instance
instant
case
establish
charge
petitioner
personal
political
sympathies
general
accord
wife
eipsb
apparently
relied
statements
made
investigators
old
friends
petitioner
thus
following
questions
asked
petitioner
like
read
quotation
testimony
person
identified
close
friend
long
period
years
saying
one
day
reading
great
deal
books
literature
wish
comment
incidentally
man
testimony
concerning
entirely
favorable
one
respect
stated
think
communist
state
thought
influenced
jean
viewpoints
received
impressions
definite
wife
parlor
pink
going
along
friend
testified
believed
influenced
jean
wild
theories
decided
time
association
wife
another
man
indicates
friend
long
period
time
visitor
home
occasions
regarding
visits
met
wife
friends
people
talking
past
one
occasion
mentioned
particular
topic
conversation
china
set
forth
conversation
seemed
general
agreement
among
time
revolutionists
china
actually
communists
agrarian
reformists
probably
know
part
communist
propaganda
line
several
years
back
greene
got
information
indicating
period
marriage
first
wife
constantly
finding
fault
american
institutions
opposing
american
capitalistic
system
never
anything
praise
russians
everything
attempted
find
case
statement
another
witness
respect
felt
modern
people
country
rich
powerful
capitalistic
system
country
disadvantage
working
people
working
people
exploited
rich
statement
another
one
associates
effect
times
present
argument
man
indicated
us
pretty
well
versed
communist
party
line
time
found
parroting
arguments
assumed
got
wife
wish
comment
made
clear
following
testimony
jerome
fenton
director
industrial
personnel
security
department
defense
subcommittee
constitutional
rights
senate
judiciary
committee
given
november
type
evidence
received
hearing
boards
besides
evidence
persons
oath
reports
various
governmental
investigative
agencies
reports
various
governmental
investigations
might
hearsay
might
think
fair
statement
fact
might
appeals
ninth
district
sic
said
respect
port
security
program
second
third
hearsay
might
question
refers
opinion
appeals
ninth
circuit
parker
lester
answer
yes
tell
type
help
given
hearing
board
reports
respect
matter
evaluation
nature
evaluation
used
purpose
well
board
person
called
security
adviser
expert
particular
area
screening
board
one
individuals
people
know
evaluate
reports
evaluate
information
know
separate
wheat
chaff
assist
boards
expert
take
report
make
determination
assisting
board
reliability
witness
never
seen
perhaps
even
opportunity
see
person
interviewed
witness
well
nothing
witness
interviewed
witness
better
purpose
exec
order
fed
reg
filed
december
empowered
secretary
war
establish
maintain
military
guards
patrols
take
appropriate
measures
protect
injury
destruction
material
premises
utilities
even
order
relevant
authority
programs
created
world
war
ii
doubtful
provides
specific
authorization
hearings
far
appears
substantial
official
notice
congress
procedures
used
screening
industrial
workers
embodied
doc
compilation
laws
executive
orders
regulations
relating
internal
security
printed
request
single
senator
reproduced
among
documents
without
specific
comment
industrial
personnel
security
review
regulation
hearings
referred
following
passage
testimony
department
defense
representative
constitutes
description
made
committee
concerning
procedures
used
department
clearance
program
connection
procurement
programs
department
defense
regulations
prescribed
provide
uniform
standards
criteria
determining
eligibility
contractors
contractor
employees
certain
individuals
access
classified
defense
information
regulations
also
establish
administrative
procedures
governing
disposition
cases
military
department
activity
thereof
made
recommendation
determination
respect
denial
suspension
revocation
clearance
contractor
contractor
employee
respect
denial
withdrawal
authorization
access
certain
individuals
department
defense
assumes
unless
information
contrary
received
contractors
contractor
employees
loyal
government
responsibilities
military
establishment
necessitate
vigorous
application
policies
designed
minimize
security
risk
incident
use
classified
information
contractors
contractor
employees
accordingly
measures
taken
provide
continuing
assurance
contractor
contractor
employee
granted
clearance
available
information
indicates
granting
clearance
may
clearly
consistent
interests
national
security
time
every
possible
safeguard
within
limitations
national
security
provided
ensure
contractor
contractor
employee
denied
clearance
without
opportunity
fair
hearing
estimated
approximately
three
million
persons
access
classified
information
covered
industrial
security
program
brown
loyalty
security
association
bar
city
new
york
report
special
committee
federal
program
justice
harlan
concurring
specially
written
sides
case
makes
appropriate
word
one
concurs
judgment
join
opinion
unlike
brother
clark
finds
case
clear
simple
consider
constitutional
issue
presents
difficult
view
quite
properly
declines
decide
present
posture
case
unwillingness
subscribe
opinion
due
fact
unnecessarily
deals
issue
disclaims
deciding
present
purposes
need
said
drawn
deciding
constitutionality
revocation
procedures
employed
case
use
procedures
matters
kind
deliberately
considered
expressly
authorized
congress
president
alone
position
evaluate
first
instance
totality
factors
bearing
upon
necessity
use
much
courts
entitled
asked
express
constitutional
judgment
upon
issue
fraught
important
consequences
government
citizen
ample
justification
abstaining
constitutional
decision
stage
case
afforded
traditional
wise
rule
reaching
constitutional
issues
unnecessarily
prematurely
rule
indeed
consistently
followed
faced
confrontation
issues
security
loyalty
cases
see
peters
hobby
vitarelli
seaton
cf
service
dulles
kent
dulles
adherence
rule
understand
underlying
basis
today
decision
basis
join
judgment
regrettable
brother
clark
far
yielded
temptations
colorful
characterization
depict
issue
case
whether
citizen
constitutional
right
access
government
military
secrets
suggest
action
today
requires
president
cabinet
members
revoke
refusal
give
petitioner
access
military
secrets
despite
views
may
reliability
course
decision
involves
issue
consequences
basic
constitutional
issue
whether
petitioner
entitled
access
classified
material
rather
whether
particular
procedures
employed
deny
clearance
security
grounds
constitutionally
permissible
good
reason
reach
issue
matters
stand
certainly
nothing
opinion
suggests
petitioner
must
given
access
classified
material
justice
clark
dissenting
case
clear
simple
respondents
members
president
cabinet
series
hearings
refused
give
greene
access
certain
government
military
information
classified
secret
pertinent
executive
order
defines
secret
information
defense
information
material
unauthorized
disclosure
result
serious
damage
nation
jeopardizing
international
relations
endangering
effectiveness
program
policy
vital
importance
national
defense
compromising
important
military
defense
plans
scientific
technological
developments
important
national
defense
information
revealing
important
intelligence
operations
exec
order
fed
reg
cfr
comp
holding
greene
constitutional
protection
private
job
ordered
president
cabinet
members
revoke
refusal
give
greene
access
military
secrets
strikes
present
regulations
insufficiently
authorized
either
president
congress
procedures
fail
provide
confrontation
board
hearings
let
us
first
consider
problem
constitutional
issue
believe
error
holding
must
order
reach
authorization
issue
greene
right
hold
specific
private
employment
follow
chosen
profession
free
unreasonable
governmental
interference
protected
fifth
amendment
cites
four
cases
support
proposition
says
compare
four
others
read
cases
one
point
fact
find
single
case
support
position
even
suit
damages
ground
interference
private
contracts
lie
government
congress
specifically
exempted
suits
tort
claims
act
action
today
may
effect
exemption
since
greene
claim
vitarelli
see
vitarelli
seaton
reimbursement
loss
wages
see
taylor
mcelroy
post
date
back
salary
time
year
holding
fifth
amendment
protects
greene
ignores
basic
consideration
case
namely
person
save
president
constitutional
right
access
governmental
secrets
even
though
access
necessary
one
keep
job
private
industry
still
entitled
secrets
matters
consequence
unable
secure
specific
job
loses
one
presently
enjoys
simple
reason
conclusion
constitutional
right
secrets
access
secrets
granted
government
entirely
permissive
may
revoked
time
cabinet
officers
done
every
day
governmental
operation
seems
hold
access
granted
greene
benefit
access
granted
secure
government
supplies
services
needed
contract
erco
specifically
provided
action
taken
cabinet
officers
greene
general
manager
erco
knew
provisions
every
person
working
government
contracts
rights
greene
given
government
indeed
box
said
perkins
lukens
steel
like
private
individuals
businesses
government
enjoys
unrestricted
power
produce
supplies
determine
deal
fix
terms
conditions
upon
make
needed
purchases
judicial
restraint
administer
government
purchasing
constitute
break
settled
judicial
practice
departure
fields
hitherto
wisely
happily
apportioned
genius
polity
administration
another
branch
government
time
since
programs
vogue
established
rights
confrontation
witnesses
required
fact
present
regulations
patterned
employee
loyalty
program
first
inaugurated
upon
passage
hatch
act
rights
confrontation
never
recognized
every
attorney
general
since
time
approved
procedures
every
president
noted
though
several
cases
attacked
regulations
ground
yet
strike
shall
labor
point
say
opinion
procedures
comport
fairness
required
administrative
action
security
field
score
cases
cited
support
position
one
contrary
action
striking
program
lack
specific
authorization
indeed
strange
hard
understand
critical
time
national
emergency
defense
establishment
know
whether
program
constitutional
wherein
deficient
sure
remember
times
emergency
grave
present
permitted
without
hearing
whatsoever
much
less
confrontation
remove
american
citizens
homes
west
coast
place
concentration
camps
see
hirabayashi
korematsu
examination
japanese
exclusion
orders
indicates
clearly
executive
order
general
authorization
two
congress
time
created
criminal
offenses
violation
exclusion
curfew
orders
military
commander
likewise
criminal
statutes
japanese
orders
time
war
involved
inception
war
continued
national
emergency
declared
president
one
informed
present
world
affairs
say
safety
less
jeopardy
today
fact
spending
nearly
much
money
protect
war
period
light
inescapable
existing
authorizations
entirely
sufficient
let
us
examine
ii
president
congress
granted
sufficient
authority
cabinet
officers
national
security
act
stat
effected
reorganization
military
departments
placed
secretary
defense
head
national
military
establishment
section
act
transferred
new
organization
laws
orders
regulations
actions
applicable
respect
function
transferred
act
section
created
munitions
board
within
military
establishment
supervision
secretary
defense
among
functions
coordinate
appropriate
activities
within
national
military
establishment
regard
industrial
matters
including
procurement
plans
plan
military
aspects
industrial
mobilization
perform
duties
secretary
defense
may
direct
munitions
board
responsible
necessary
action
coordinate
internal
security
within
national
military
establishment
regard
industrial
matters
work
planned
phases
carried
forward
following
programs
development
plans
directives
protect
classified
armed
forces
information
hands
industry
potential
enemies
establishment
uniform
methods
handling
personnel
clearances
secrecy
agreements
first
report
secretary
defense
industrial
security
program
coordinate
develop
uniform
practices
protect
classified
military
information
placed
hands
industry
procurement
research
contracts
continued
munitions
board
criteria
developed
granting
denial
personnel
facility
clearances
performance
classified
contracts
work
started
establish
central
security
clearance
register
centralize
clearance
data
ready
reference
departments
prevent
duplication
making
clearance
investigations
joint
personnel
security
board
administers
program
industrial
employment
review
board
hears
appeals
security
clearance
denials
second
report
secretary
defense
fiscal
year
secretary
defense
informed
president
report
required
law
status
industrial
security
program
past
months
munitions
board
activated
industrial
employment
review
board
established
procedures
latter
operate
developed
set
uniform
criteria
stipulating
circumstances
security
clearances
denied
munitions
board
also
established
central
index
security
clearance
file
serve
clearing
house
individual
facility
clearances
denials
developed
standard
security
requirements
check
list
uniform
standards
security
investigations
facility
contractors
personnel
developed
standard
military
security
agreement
coordinated
bind
potential
suppliers
security
regulations
classified
contract
awarded
manual
give
security
guidance
industry
prepared
semiannual
report
secretary
defense
july
thus
see
program
years
carried
express
authority
president
regularly
reported
highest
cabinet
officers
say
despite
facts
president
sufficiently
authorized
program
beyond
unless
means
necessary
president
write
industrial
security
manual
hand
furthermore
think
congress
sufficiently
authorized
program
kept
fully
aware
development
appropriated
money
support
formative
period
program
congress
appropriation
hearings
kept
fully
informed
activity
carpenter
chairman
munitions
board
appeared
subcommittee
house
committee
appropriations
testify
concerning
requested
appropriation
board
report
indicates
much
testimony
record
contain
specific
references
program
attack
significantly
appropriation
bill
included
item
maintenance
inter
alia
board
general
timberlake
member
board
testified
going
intensify
industrial
mobilization
planning
within
department
defense
particular
emphasis
industrial
security
house
representatives
hearings
subcommittee
committee
appropriations
supplemental
appropriation
sess
reorganization
plan
functions
munitions
board
transferred
various
assistant
secretaries
defense
industrial
security
program
put
assistant
secretary
defense
manpower
personnel
reserve
forces
course
office
received
appropriation
year
hearings
cite
two
certainly
indicate
awareness
part
congress
existence
industrial
security
program
continued
appropriations
hardly
bespeak
unwillingness
part
congress
carried
congress
motion
senator
wiley
unanimous
consent
caused
printed
internal
security
manual
doc
sess
compilation
laws
regulations
congressional
committees
relating
national
security
contained
volume
industrial
personnel
security
review
regulation
verbatim
copy
regulations
set
secretary
defense
february
manual
outlined
detail
hearing
procedures
condemned
important
note
final
denial
greene
clearance
board
acting
regulations
still
one
voice
raised
either
within
without
halls
congress
defense
department
exceeded
authority
contractor
employees
denied
constitutional
rights
cases
held
inaction
congress
circumstances
much
less
specific
clear
ratification
program
carried
executive
ask
vital
blind
see
others
see
understand
rumely
certainly
clear
suppose
present
fastidiousness
satisfied
president
incorporating
present
industrial
security
program
specific
executive
order
congress
placing
statute
books
seems
entirely
superfluous
light
clear
authorization
presently
existing
cabinet
officers
also
subjects
government
multitudinous
actions
perhaps
large
damages
reason
discharges
made
pursuant
present
procedures
might
add
nota
bene
even
cabinet
officers
given
specific
direction
opinion
today
dealing
copiously
constitutional
issues
puts
cloud
employee
loyalty
program
one
attack
neither
requires
hearings
afford
confrontation
disclaims
deciding
constitutional
question
one
reading
opinion
doubt
explicit
language
broad
sweep
speaks
prophecy
let
us
hope
winds
may
change
present
temporary
debacle
turn
rout
internal
security
brother
harlan
kindly
credits
colorful
characterization
stating
issue
take
great
pride
authorship
must
say
instance
merely
agreed
statement
issue
solicitor
general
five
different
places
brief
see
pp
erco
agreed
government
contract
well
known
greene
exclude
individual
part
plant
work
contract
performed
cleared
navy
access
military
secrets
brother
harlan
suggest
action
today
requires
president
cabinet
members
revoke
refusal
give
petitioner
access
military
secrets
despite
views
may
reliability
government
officials
well
versed
application
judgments
practicalities
government
operation
say
relief
greene
seeks
grants
substance
mandatory
injunction
requiring
government
show
practice
allow
contractors
show
defense
secrets
notwithstanding
judgment
executive
branch
disclosure
might
jeopardize
national
safety
brief
dent
west
virginia
held
west
virginia
statute
deprive
one
previously
practicing
medicine
rights
without
due
process
requiring
obtain
license
act
schware
board
bar
examiners
likewise
license
case
pass
upon
right
privilege
practice
law
merely
holding
facts
refusal
permit
schware
take
examination
invidiously
discriminatory
peters
hobby
simply
held
action
taken
violated
executive
order
involved
concurring
opinion
douglas
went
alone
question
right
discuss
question
much
less
pass
upon
slochower
board
education
held
summary
dismissal
without
evidence
new
york
school
teacher
pleaded
fifth
amendment
senate
committee
violated
due
process
case
merely
touched
right
plead
fifth
amendment
property
rights
truax
raich
allgeyer
louisiana
powell
pennsylvania
equal
protection
cases
wherein
discrimination
claimed
greene
alleges
discrimination
see
bailey
richardson
app
affirmed
equally
divided
peters
hobby
report
commission
government
security
doc
sess
war
department
pamphlet
provided
criteria
procedures
removal
subversives
basic
criterion
good
cause
suspect
employee
subversive
activity
latter
defined
sabotage
espionage
wilful
activity
intended
disrupt
national
defense
program
basic
procedure
removal
set
adequate
investigation
revealed
good
cause
suspect
employee
subversive
activity
national
defense
project
importance
army
navy
procurement
vital
success
project
well
security
loyal
employees
may
require
army
navy
without
revealing
nature
source
evidence
request
immediate
removal
individual
project
end
cooperation
organizations
representative
organized
labor
solicited
following
program
national
security
act
amendments
stat
amended
delete
subparagraph
annual
report
secretary
army
fiscal
year
part
iv
exec
order
specifically
stated
investigative
agency
may
refuse
disclose
names
confidential
informants
provided
furnishes
sufficient
information
informants
basis
requesting
department
agency
make
adequate
evaluation
information
furnished
provided
advises
requesting
department
agency
writing
essential
protection
informants
investigation
cases
identity
informants
revealed
house
representatives
hearings
subcommittee
committee
appropriations
national
military
establishment
appropriation
bill
sess
reason
dearth
legislative
reference
program
appears
hearings
appropriation
bill
consideration
time
proposal
fund
reimburse
contractor
employees
suspended
security
check
subsequently
cleared
general
moore
testified
past
reimbursement
made
service
secretaries
contingency
funds
followed
colloquy
mahon
contingency
fund
buy
boy
top
toy
provided
secretary
defense
thinks
proper
moore
right
come
explain
committee
respect
secret
session
much
spent
precisely
spent
house
representatives
hearings
subcommittee
committee
appropriations
department
defense
appropriations
sess