montana
argued
december
decided
february
montana
levies
gross
receipts
tax
upon
contractors
public
private
construction
projects
public
contractor
may
credit
gross
receipts
tax
payments
personal
property
corporate
income
individual
income
taxes
remaining
gross
receipts
tax
liability
customarily
passed
form
increased
construction
costs
governmental
unit
financing
project
contractor
federal
project
montana
brought
suit
state
contending
gross
receipts
tax
unconstitutionally
discriminated
government
companies
dealt
litigation
directed
financed
less
month
later
government
brought
action
federal
district
challenging
constitutionality
tax
stipulation
case
continued
pending
resolution
litigation
concluded
decision
montana
upholding
tax
kiewit
found
distinction
public
private
contractors
consistent
mandates
supremacy
equal
protection
clauses
solicitor
general
direction
contractor
abandoned
request
review
contractor
instituted
second
action
regarding
certain
tax
payments
different
kiewit
montana
finding
second
claim
essentially
different
first
invoked
doctrines
collateral
estoppel
res
judicata
affirm
dismissal
complaint
kiewit
ii
thereafter
district
heard
instant
case
merits
concluded
bound
kiewit
tax
violated
supremacy
clause
held
collaterally
estopped
challenging
prior
judgment
montana
pp
interests
underlying
related
doctrines
collateral
estoppel
res
judicata
right
question
fact
distinctly
put
issue
directly
determined
competent
jurisdiction
disputed
subsequent
suit
parties
privies
southern
pacific
similarly
implicated
nonparties
assume
control
litigation
direct
financial
proprietary
interest
seek
redetermine
issues
previously
resolved
undisputed
exercised
sufficient
control
kiewit
litigation
actuate
principles
collateral
estoppel
pp
precise
constitutional
claim
advanced
litigation
presented
resolved
government
kiewit
pp
factual
legal
context
issues
case
arise
materially
changed
since
kiewit
thus
normal
rules
preclusion
operate
relieve
parties
redundant
litigation
identical
question
statute
application
taxpayer
status
tait
western
maryland
commissioner
sunnen
distinguished
pp
though
preclusion
may
inappropriate
issues
law
arise
successive
actions
involving
unrelated
subject
matter
exception
inapposite
since
government
demands
closely
aligned
time
subject
kiewit
case
party
compelled
accept
state
determination
issues
essential
resolution
federal
questions
rather
government
freely
without
reservation
submitte
federal
claims
decision
state
courts
ha
decided
england
medical
examiners
since
government
alleged
unfairness
inadequacy
state
procedures
voluntarily
submitted
estopped
relitigating
issues
previously
adjudicated
pp
marshall
delivered
opinion
burger
brennan
stewart
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
stevens
joined
rehnquist
filed
concurring
statement
post
white
filed
dissenting
opinion
post
robert
poore
special
assistant
attorney
general
montana
argued
cause
appellants
brief
terry
cosgrove
special
assistant
attorney
general
robert
corcoran
stuart
smith
argued
cause
brief
solicitor
general
mccree
assistant
attorney
general
ferguson
david
english
carmack
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
louis
lefkowitz
attorney
general
ruth
kessler
toch
solicitor
general
francis
dow
assistant
attorney
general
state
new
york
slade
gorton
attorney
general
richard
holmquist
senior
assistant
attorney
general
greg
montgomery
assistant
attorney
general
state
washington
attorneys
general
officials
respective
jurisdictions
follows
marshall
coleman
attorney
general
virginia
john
macconnell
assistant
attorney
general
john
lasota
acting
attorney
general
arizona
ian
macpherson
assistant
attorney
general
allen
olson
attorney
general
north
dakota
kenneth
jakes
special
assistant
attorney
general
avrum
gross
attorney
general
alaska
joseph
donohue
assistant
attorney
general
paul
douglas
attorney
general
nebraska
ralph
gillan
assistant
attorney
general
frank
burch
attorney
general
maryland
gerald
langbaum
assistant
attorney
general
ronald
amemiya
attorney
general
hawaii
bruce
honda
deputy
attorney
general
robert
list
attorney
general
nevada
james
thompson
chief
deputy
attorney
general
james
redden
attorney
general
oregon
william
baxley
attorney
general
alabama
herbert
burson
john
rooney
acting
attorney
general
wyoming
james
douglass
senior
assistant
attorney
general
philip
jacobsen
acting
attorney
general
guam
slade
gorton
attorney
general
washington
richard
holmquist
senior
assistant
attorney
general
bill
clinton
attorney
general
arkansas
martin
nevrla
assistant
attorney
general
robert
shevin
attorney
general
florida
maxie
broome
assistant
attorney
general
chauncey
browning
attorney
general
west
virginia
thomas
steele
assistant
attorney
general
richard
turner
attorney
general
iowa
george
murray
assistant
attorney
general
wayne
kidwell
attorney
general
idaho
theodore
spangler
toney
anaya
attorney
general
new
mexico
jan
unna
assistant
attorney
general
theodore
sendak
attorney
general
indiana
donald
bogard
miguel
attorney
general
puerto
rico
victor
cruz
ojeda
frank
kelley
attorney
general
michigan
macfarlane
attorney
general
colorado
steven
kaplan
assistant
attorney
general
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
state
montana
imposes
one
percent
gross
receipts
tax
upon
contractors
public
private
construction
projects
mont
rev
codes
ann
supp
public
contractor
may
credit
gross
receipts
tax
payments
personal
property
corporate
income
individual
income
taxes
remaining
gross
receipts
liability
customarily
passed
form
increased
construction
costs
governmental
unit
financing
project
issue
appeal
whether
prior
judgment
montana
upholding
tax
precludes
contesting
constitutionality
whether
tax
discriminates
federal
government
violation
supremacy
clause
peter
kiewit
sons
contractor
federal
dam
project
montana
brought
suit
state
contending
montana
gross
receipts
tax
unconstitutionally
discriminated
companies
dealt
litigation
directed
financed
less
month
state
suit
filed
government
initiated
challenge
constitutionality
tax
district
district
montana
stipulation
parties
instant
case
continued
pending
resolution
litigation
litigation
concluded
unanimous
decision
montana
sustaining
tax
peter
kiewit
sons
state
board
equalization
mont
kiewit
found
distinction
public
private
contractors
consistent
mandates
supremacy
equal
protection
clauses
contractor
subsequently
filed
notice
appeal
abandoned
request
review
direction
solicitor
general
app
juris
statement
instituted
second
action
state
seeking
refund
certain
tax
payments
different
involved
kiewit
determining
contractor
second
legal
claim
material
respects
identical
first
montana
invoked
doctrines
collateral
estoppel
res
judicata
affirm
dismissal
complaint
peter
kiewit
sons
department
revenue
mont
kiewit
ii
decision
kiewit
ii
district
heard
instant
case
merits
divided
opinion
concluded
bound
kiewit
decision
struck
tax
violative
supremacy
clause
supp
majority
began
premise
supremacy
clause
immunizes
federal
government
direct
taxation
also
indirect
taxation
operates
discriminate
government
transacts
business
see
detroit
phillips
chemical
dumas
independent
school
private
contractors
subject
montana
gross
receipts
tax
reasoned
statute
impermissibly
singled
federal
government
dealt
disparate
treatment
tax
applied
state
municipal
well
federal
contractors
majority
view
negate
statute
discriminatory
character
although
contractors
state
projects
might
pass
amount
tax
liability
state
form
higher
construction
costs
montana
recoup
additional
expenditure
revenue
tax
generated
contrast
federal
contractors
shifted
burden
increased
costs
receive
offsetting
revenues
accordingly
concluded
statute
encroached
upon
immunity
discriminatory
taxation
enjoyed
federal
government
supremacy
clause
one
judge
argued
dissent
estopped
challenging
constitutionality
tax
statutory
scheme
encompassed
receipts
municipal
state
well
federal
contractors
discriminatory
within
meaning
phillips
chemical
dumas
independent
school
supra
kilkenny
dissenting
noted
probable
jurisdiction
find
constitutional
question
presented
appeal
determined
adversely
prior
state
proceeding
reverse
grounds
collateral
estoppel
without
reaching
merits
ii
fundamental
precept
adjudication
embodied
related
doctrines
collateral
estoppel
res
judicata
right
question
fact
distinctly
put
issue
directly
determined
competent
jurisdiction
disputed
subsequent
suit
parties
privies
southern
pacific
res
judicata
final
judgment
merits
bars
claims
parties
privies
based
cause
action
cromwell
county
sac
lawlor
national
screen
service
moore
federal
practice
pp
ed
hereinafter
moore
restatement
second
judgments
tent
draft
mar
merger
bar
collateral
estoppel
issue
actually
necessarily
determined
competent
jurisdiction
determination
conclusive
subsequent
suits
based
different
cause
action
involving
party
prior
litigation
parklane
hosiery
shore
scott
collateral
estoppel
judgment
harv
rev
restatement
second
judgments
tent
draft
apr
issue
preclusion
application
doctrines
central
purpose
civil
courts
established
conclusive
resolution
disputes
within
jurisdictions
southern
pacific
supra
hart
steel
railroad
supply
preclude
parties
contesting
matters
full
fair
opportunity
litigate
protects
adversaries
expense
vexation
attending
multiple
lawsuits
conserves
judicial
resources
fosters
reliance
judicial
action
minimizing
possibility
inconsistent
decisions
interests
similarly
implicated
nonparties
assume
control
litigation
direct
financial
proprietary
interest
seek
redetermine
issues
previously
resolved
observed
souffront
compagnie
des
sucreries
persons
whose
benefit
whose
direction
cause
action
litigated
said
strangers
cause
ne
prosecutes
defends
suit
name
another
establish
protect
right
assists
prosecution
defense
action
aid
interest
much
bound
party
record
see
schnell
peter
eckrich
sons
cf
zenith
radio
hazeltine
research
preclusion
nonparties
falls
rubric
collateral
estoppel
rather
res
judicata
latter
doctrine
presupposes
identity
causes
action
cause
action
nonparty
vicariously
asserted
differs
definition
subsequently
seeks
litigate
right
see
merriam
saalfield
restatement
second
judgments
comment
tent
draft
apr
moore
pp
note
developments
law
res
judicata
harv
rev
exercised
control
kiewit
litigation
dispute
government
stipulated
required
kiewit
lawsuit
filed
reviewed
approved
complaint
paid
attorneys
fees
costs
directed
appeal
state
district
montana
appeared
submitted
brief
amicus
montana
directed
filing
notice
appeal
effectuated
kiewit
abandonment
appeal
advice
solicitor
general
app
juris
statement
iii
determine
appropriate
application
collateral
estoppel
instant
case
necessitates
three
inquiries
first
whether
issues
presented
litigation
substance
resolved
kiewit
second
whether
controlling
facts
legal
principles
changed
significantly
since
judgment
finally
whether
special
circumstances
warrant
exception
normal
rules
preclusion
review
record
kiewit
dispels
doubt
plaintiff
raised
montana
decided
precise
constitutional
claim
advances
complaint
kiewit
contractor
alleged
gross
receipts
tax
accompanying
regulations
unconstitutional
inter
alia
illegally
discriminate
plaintiff
agencies
instrumentalities
business
deny
due
process
law
equal
protection
laws
illegally
impose
tax
plaintiff
uniform
upon
class
subjects
illegally
improperly
interfere
federal
government
power
select
contractors
schedule
construction
conflict
federal
law
policy
regulating
federal
procurement
illegally
violate
immunity
federal
government
instruments
including
plaintiff
state
control
performance
functions
illegally
frustrate
federal
policy
selecting
lowest
possible
bidder
app
federal
government
treated
manner
state
montana
treats
subdivisions
municipalities
discrimination
federal
government
claim
private
contractors
paying
tax
public
contractors
however
according
phillips
chemical
dumas
school
moses
lake
homes
grant
county
required
state
give
special
treatment
received
federal
government
act
involved
treats
federal
government
manner
treats
deal
part
state
government
kiewit
illegally
discriminate
plaintiff
agencies
instrumentalities
business
violation
supremacy
clause
article
vi
clause
fourteenth
amendment
illegally
impose
tax
plaintiff
contractors
subcontractors
uniform
upon
class
subjects
violation
fourteenth
amendment
illegally
force
america
pay
construction
private
party
corporation
violation
supremacy
clause
art
vi
cl
illegally
interfer
federal
government
free
choice
choose
contractors
frustrat
policy
choosing
lowest
bidder
violation
federal
procurement
law
supremacy
clause
art
iv
sic
cl
app
relying
commissioner
sunnen
argues
collateral
estoppel
extends
contexts
controlling
facts
applicable
legal
rules
remain
unchanged
government
view
factual
stasis
missing
contract
issue
kiewit
contained
critical
provision
contracts
involved
instant
litigation
contract
army
corps
engineers
kiewit
unable
take
advantage
credit
provisions
gross
receipts
tax
however
altered
policy
since
required
montana
contractors
seek
available
refunds
credits
see
app
government
reads
kiewit
decision
montana
proceeded
assumption
kiewit
able
avail
offsetting
income
property
tax
credits
might
total
washout
gross
receipts
tax
liability
thus
according
government
holding
kiewit
montana
statute
discriminate
circumstances
federal
government
contractual
arrangement
tax
might
financial
impact
brief
uncontroverted
evidence
case
establishes
taking
credits
available
federal
contractors
still
subject
gross
revenue
tax
one
percent
app
juris
statement
government
submits
factual
premise
kiewit
holding
absent
disagree
course
true
changes
facts
essential
judgment
render
collateral
estoppel
inapplicable
subsequent
action
raising
issues
see
certain
land
irving
place
street
metcalf
commissioner
alexander
commissioner
moore
pp
pp
construe
opinion
kiewit
predicated
factual
assumption
gross
receipts
tax
cancel
public
contractors
took
available
refunds
credits
montana
adverted
washout
possibility
discussing
origin
gross
receipts
tax
rather
measure
prior
enactment
statute
certain
public
contractors
evaded
assessment
local
property
taxes
shifting
equipment
one
construction
site
another
filing
corporate
personal
income
tax
returns
fairly
reflect
amount
profit
attributable
construction
projects
within
state
establishing
flat
percentage
tax
gross
receipts
credits
available
income
property
tax
payments
montana
legislature
sought
remove
incentive
contractors
dissemble
location
taxable
equipment
source
taxable
revenues
statutory
scheme
contractor
paid
substantial
amount
property
income
taxes
might
claiming
payments
credits
effectively
cancel
gross
receipts
tax
liability
practice
noted
kiewit
statute
resulted
total
offset
gross
receipts
payments
part
provisions
federal
contracts
significantly
however
rely
potential
absence
tax
liability
analysis
kiewit
constitutional
challenge
indeed
even
allude
washout
potential
course
discussion
focused
rather
rationality
classification
public
private
contractors
parity
treatment
public
contractors
ibid
conclusion
washout
potential
tax
controlling
significance
kiewit
reinforced
montana
holding
kiewit
ii
contractor
alleged
gross
receipts
tax
liability
exceeded
property
income
tax
credits
argued
basis
decision
kiewit
act
properly
enforced
result
washout
kiewit
ii
montana
rejected
reading
kiewit
much
narro
offset
possibility
materialized
kiewit
view
fact
inconsequential
warrant
relitigation
statute
constitutionality
view
absence
total
washout
altering
facts
essential
judgment
kiewit
thus
unless
major
changes
law
governing
intergovernmental
tax
immunity
since
kiewit
government
reliance
commissioner
sunnen
misplaced
sunnen
involved
tax
status
certain
income
generated
license
agreement
particular
tax
period
although
previous
litigation
settled
status
income
agreement
earlier
tax
years
declined
give
collateral
estoppel
effect
prior
judgment
significant
change
legal
climate
underlying
sunnen
decision
concern
modifications
controlling
legal
principles
render
previous
determination
inconsistent
prevailing
doctrine
determination
perpetuated
succeeding
year
taxpayer
involved
original
litigation
accorded
tax
treatment
different
given
taxpayers
class
result
inequalities
administration
revenue
laws
discriminatory
distinctions
tax
liability
fertile
basis
litigious
confusion
collateral
estoppel
meant
create
vested
rights
decisions
become
obsolete
erroneous
time
thereby
causing
inequities
among
taxpayers
ibid
citations
omitted
factual
legal
context
issues
case
arise
materially
altered
since
kiewit
normal
rules
preclusion
operate
relieve
parties
redundant
litigation
identical
question
statute
application
taxpayer
status
tait
western
maryland
see
russel
mfg
sole
remaining
question
whether
particular
circumstances
case
justify
exception
general
principles
estoppel
possible
relevance
exception
obtains
unmixed
questions
law
successive
actions
involving
substantially
unrelated
claims
moser
recognized
moser
example
deciding
case
enunciated
rule
law
parties
subsequent
action
upon
different
demand
estopped
insisting
law
otherwise
merely
parties
cases
fact
question
right
distinctly
adjudged
original
action
disputed
subsequent
action
even
though
determination
reached
upon
erroneous
view
erroneous
application
law
ibid
emphasis
added
case
implicate
right
litigant
properly
invoked
jurisdiction
federal
district
consider
federal
constitutional
claims
compelled
without
consent
accept
state
determination
claims
england
medical
examiners
omitted
held
england
abstention
doctrine
may
serve
vehicle
depriving
individuals
otherwise
cognizable
right
federal
courts
make
factual
determinations
essential
resolution
federal
questions
see
naacp
button
however
england
party
freely
without
reservation
submit
ted
federal
claims
decision
state
courts
ha
decided
england
medical
examiners
supra
considerations
comity
well
repose
militate
redetermination
issues
federal
forum
behest
plaintiff
chosen
litigate
state
finally
government
alleged
unfairness
inadequacy
state
procedures
voluntarily
submitted
must
conclude
therefore
full
fair
opportunity
press
constitutional
challenges
kiewit
accordingly
government
estopped
seeking
contrary
resolution
issues
judgment
district
reversed
footnotes
see
supp
see
app
see
hazard
res
nova
res
judicata
cal
rev
vestal
judicata
variables
adjudicating
bodies
geo
note
developments
law
res
judicata
harv
rev
although
term
privies
used
occasion
denominate
nonparties
control
litigation
see
merriam
saalfield
restatement
judgments
comment
usage
criticized
conclusory
analytically
unsound
moore
cf
note
harv
nomenclature
abandoned
applicable
section
second
edition
restatement
see
restatement
second
judgments
tent
draft
apr
clause
contract
enumerated
credit
provisions
montana
statute
provided
contractor
turn
subcontractors
take
advantage
credits
peter
kiewit
sons
state
board
equalization
mont
kiewit
record
reflect
reason
government
policy
see
tr
oral
arg
threshold
difficulty
government
argument
record
support
assertion
contractual
provisions
barring
contractors
taking
credits
longer
applicable
contracts
involved
litigation
brief
see
also
tr
oral
arg
montana
gross
receipts
statute
enacted
government
limited
request
relief
gross
receipts
taxes
paid
contractual
provisions
involved
kiewit
discontinued
see
supra
contrary
government
amended
complaint
instant
case
seeks
refund
tax
payments
less
credits
made
montana
statute
app
thus
government
contention
concerning
factual
changes
justify
district
refusal
invoke
estoppel
respect
claims
apparently
problem
arisen
appreciable
extent
private
contractors
tr
oral
arg
see
supra
government
seeks
distinguish
england
ground
technically
abstain
rather
parties
request
continued
action
pending
resolution
state
courts
montana
app
juris
statement
government
view
rule
england
arises
party
freely
submits
federal
claims
adjudication
state
courts
party
kiewit
government
submits
bound
judgment
case
brief
agree
district
action
properly
characterized
continuance
res
judicata
doctrine
involved
england
inapplicable
nonparties
see
supra
neither
point
availing
since
dispose
case
grounds
collateral
estoppel
apply
nonparties
see
invoke
england
simply
dispel
inference
result
obtain
federal
government
forced
state
reserved
federal
claim
redetermination
issues
warranted
reason
doubt
quality
extensiveness
fairness
procedures
followed
prior
litigation
see
restatement
second
judgments
tent
draft
apr
note
preclusive
effect
state
judgments
subsequent
actions
colum
rev
cf
gibson
berryhill
trainor
hernandez
stevens
dissenting
justice
rehnquist
concurring
join
opinion
customary
understanding
references
law
review
articles
drafts
finally
adopted
versions
restatement
judgments
intended
bind
views
expressed
therein
issues
presented
facts
case
justice
white
dissenting
disagree
government
estopped
litigating
claim
federal
virtue
earlier
action
courts
montana
merits
think
montana
gross
receipts
tax
constitutionally
infirm
thus
affirm
decision
basic
principle
collateral
estoppel
must
confined
situations
matter
raised
second
suit
identical
respects
decided
first
proceeding
controlling
facts
remain
unchanged
commissioner
sunnen
dispute
maintains
discrepancies
facts
underlying
state
federal
actions
moment
clear
however
montana
assumed
kiewit
tax
scrutiny
rather
measure
significance
supposition
view
refuted
neither
opinion
kiewit
state
subsequent
pronouncements
kiewit
ii
assumption
lost
force
time
federal
litigation
undisputed
federal
government
abandoned
policy
requiring
contractors
dealt
forgo
credits
available
gross
receipts
law
though
federal
contractors
accordingly
availed
credits
refunds
allowable
law
uncontroverted
evidence
case
establishes
federal
contractors
still
subject
net
gross
revenue
tax
one
percent
ante
facts
developed
cast
constitutional
issues
wholly
different
light
think
properly
proceeded
decide
issues
uninhibited
prior
state
adjudication
outset
discussion
kiewit
montana
labored
demonstrate
gross
receipts
tax
issue
measure
funds
collected
pursuant
thereto
applied
credited
taxes
otherwise
due
understood
tax
practice
resulted
total
washout
gross
receipts
payments
attributed
federal
government
policy
prohibiting
certain
contractors
kiewit
taking
refunds
credits
available
law
ignorance
indifference
credit
provisions
part
contractors
maintained
aside
aberrations
act
intended
operate
revenue
enforcing
measure
peter
kiewit
sons
state
board
equalization
mont
emphasis
added
majority
surmises
state
extensive
characterization
tax
irrelevant
constitutional
analysis
view
relegates
dicta
state
careful
appraisal
operation
impact
tax
inspecting
state
constitutional
analysis
independently
evaluation
nature
tax
majority
assumes
constitutional
adjudication
proceeded
vacuo
logic
state
decision
may
well
extend
measure
say
kiewit
may
persuasive
authority
score
establish
adjudicated
issue
moreover
reliance
kiewit
ii
demonstrate
immateriality
washout
nature
tax
decision
kiewit
misplaced
recognize
montana
regarded
kiewit
second
attack
launched
contractual
credit
restrictions
removed
government
foreclosed
judgment
first
suit
addressing
kiewit
objection
application
tax
manner
raise
revenue
acknowledged
may
kiewit
entitled
refund
administrative
remedy
peter
kiewit
sons
department
revenue
mont
statute
course
contemplates
remedy
affirmatively
construe
authorize
one
yet
remark
leaves
unclear
whether
absent
remedy
persist
holding
tax
constitutional
statement
underscores
assumption
kiewit
gross
receipts
tax
device
suggests
correlatively
decision
condone
imposition
unmitigated
positive
tax
solely
public
contractors
majority
unsound
inferring
kiewit
ii
ruling
kiewit
insensitive
washout
character
gross
receipts
tax
see
modification
significant
facts
rendered
prior
state
determination
obsolete
least
future
purposes
commissioner
sunnen
supra
government
free
litigate
constitutional
challenge
federal
ii
merits
judgment
sustained
nothing
wrong
course
state
gross
receipts
tax
general
applicability
incidentally
applies
contractors
deal
federal
government
thus
increasing
construction
costs
county
fresno
james
dravo
contracting
long
tax
directly
laid
federal
government
valid
nondiscriminatory
congress
declares
otherwise
county
fresno
supra
fresno
stressed
requirement
state
tax
imposed
equally
similarly
situated
constituents
state
concern
discriminatory
taxation
returns
original
intent
culloch
maryland
wheat
observed
political
check
abuse
taxing
power
found
lacking
culloch
present
state
imposes
nondiscriminatory
tax
constituents
artificially
owned
entities
culloch
foresaw
unfairness
forcing
state
exempt
private
individuals
beneficial
interests
federal
property
taxes
imposed
similar
interests
held
others
private
property
ibid
montana
gross
receipts
tax
survive
application
foregoing
principles
law
generally
embracing
similarly
situated
state
constituents
business
private
public
sectors
mandating
collection
revenue
contractors
transact
public
entities
law
passes
contractors
deal
private
parties
thus
political
check
provided
contractors
abuse
taxing
power
lacking
ibid
appellants
maintain
contractors
deal
private
enterprises
situated
similarly
transact
public
bodies
point
special
problems
associated
enforcement
state
tax
laws
contractors
prone
move
state
pursuit
large
public
contracts
gross
receipts
tax
measure
necessary
argued
order
facilitate
enforcement
tax
laws
contractors
concededly
however
problems
exist
respect
large
private
contractors
even
assuming
differentiation
contractors
warranted
context
tax
enforcement
measures
appellants
representations
provide
basis
discriminating
regard
revenue
raising
montana
kiewit
litigation
defended
classification
equal
protection
purposes
submitting
public
stake
safety
building
projects
hence
qualifications
public
contractors
warranted
treating
contractors
differently
counterparts
considerations
like
matters
advanced
appellants
fail
explain
tax
collected
former
latter
moreover
though
law
may
sustainable
equal
protection
assault
indulgent
standard
used
area
applied
federal
supremacy
threatened
see
phillips
chemical
dumas
independent
school
circumstances
disparate
treatment
must
justified
significant
differences
two
classes
must
considerations
provid
ing
solid
support
classification
emphasis
added
seems
plain
contractors
similarly
situated
purposes
litigation
iii
appellants
contend
nonetheless
enough
tax
reaches
contractors
dealing
public
entities
state
federal
appellants
root
contention
statement
phillips
chemical
dumas
independent
school
supra
state
must
treat
deal
government
well
treats
deals
emphasis
added
phillips
furnishes
support
appellants
position
held
unconstitutional
state
tax
scheme
treated
lessees
federal
property
severely
lessees
state
property
even
addressing
issue
however
ascertained
discrimination
government
lessees
lessees
private
property
thus
phillips
evinced
concern
equal
treatment
similarly
situated
persons
connected
private
public
sector
persons
within
public
sector
event
see
basis
whatsoever
extracting
principle
state
may
favor
federal
government
proposition
state
may
favor
constituents
long
contractors
working
public
bodies
taxed
indeed
fresno
sustained
tax
assuring
persons
rented
federal
property
worse
california
tax
laws
work
private
employers
rent
houses
private
sector
laws
reaching
broadly
across
public
private
sectors
characteristic
sustained
detroit
detroit
murray
alabama
king
boozer
james
dravo
contracting
silas
mason
tax
good
reason
insist
state
tax
imposed
equally
similarly
situated
constituents
state
county
fresno
whether
connected
public
sector
private
broad
application
tax
necessary
guarantee
efficacious
political
check
potentially
abusive
taxation
montana
gross
receipts
tax
limited
contractors
provides
little
assurance
taxation
contractors
dealing
directly
state
state
agencies
affords
safeguard
discriminatory
treatment
federal
contracting
agencies
contractors
deal
tax
increase
passed
along
contractor
borne
fully
federal
agency
offset
corresponding
tax
revenues
case
state
state
perspective
tax
washout
municipalities
local
districts
true
enjoy
advantage
may
resist
tax
increases
successfully
enforced
burden
federal
government
alike
least
potentially
local
subdivisions
may
secure
offsetting
state
assistance
indirection
may
diminish
incentive
oppose
tax
hikes
even
assuming
however
local
public
bodies
share
interest
federal
government
restraining
taxes
escapes
government
must
acquiesce
limited
protection
provide
enhanced
political
check
ensue
extension
tax
similarly
situated
state
constituents
indicated
support
notion
decisions
mcculloch
condoned
state
taxation
private
interests
federal
property
common
property
description
throughout
state
mcculloch
maryland
wheat
emphasis
added
fresno
observed
escalation
state
tax
destroy
impair
federal
function
might
forestalled
imposition
tax
income
property
interests
residents
voters
state
decisions
counsel
nice
determinations
regarding
political
leverage
group
establish
simple
fundamental
proposition
federal
government
entitled
full
measure
protection
derivable
inclusion
similarly
situated
state
constituents
class
subject
tax
appellants
suggested
oral
argument
contracting
comprises
relatively
small
percentage
contracting
state
argue
exclusion
contractors
ambit
gross
receipts
tax
therefore
excusable
appellants
seriously
contend
contracting
montana
de
minimis
assertion
find
support
record
private
contracting
parties
subjected
tax
provide
significant
additional
protection
abuse
state
taxing
power
exempting
private
sector
montana
gross
receipts
tax
accordingly
contrary
constitution
believe
properly
reached
decided
merits
government
claim
dissent
reversal
judgment
administrator
miscellaneous
tax
division
montana
department
revenue
testified
federal
proceedings
administrative
remedy
existed
none
contemplated
deposition
james
madison
record
doc
true
indicated
first
opinion
held
reasonable
grounds
distinguishing
private
public
contractors
tax
purposes
discussion
differentiating
private
public
contractors
alluded
addressed
kiewit
equal
protection
claim
supremacy
claim
see
peter
kiewit
sons
state
board
equalization
mont
suggested
public
contractors
warrant
special
tax
treatment
public
construction
projects
extensively
regulated
private
jobs
subject
mandatory
supervision
inspection
state
stipulated
federal
contracts
subject
state
standards
review
supervision
state
right
authority
suspend
federal
contractor
license
state
interfere
selection
bidders
federal
government
app
juris
statement
thus
considerations
posited
state
distinguish
contractors
deal
federal
government
montana
authorized
payment
state
funds
local
political
entities
certain
contexts
mont
rev
codes
ann
supp
funding
certain
highway
improvements
expansion
services
due
coal
development
supp
state
payments
municipalities
police
departments
supp
state
payments
municipalities
fire
department
relief
associations
record
indicates
anything
contracting
nonnegligible
see
app
see
also
bureau
census
census
construction
industries