auer
et
al
robbins
et
argued
december
decided
february
held
disciplinary
deductions
element
salary
basis
test
reflects
permissible
reading
flsa
applies
public
sector
employees
apparent
secretary
interpretation
rendered
unreasonable
applied
public
sector
employees
absence
non
salary
reduction
means
discipline
peculiar
needs
quasi
military
law
enforcement
organizations
secretary
approach
must
therefore
sustained
given
grant
broad
authority
secretary
defin
delimi
statutory
exemption
scope
see
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
respondents
procedural
objection
secretary
failureto
amend
disciplinary
deduction
rule
wake
garcia
san
antonio
metropolitan
transit
authority
raised
first
instance
lawsuit
must
presented
initially
petition
secretary
amendatory
rulemaking
administrative
procedure
act
pp
secretary
reasonably
interpreted
salary
basis
test
met
employee
compensation
may
practical
matter
adjusted
ways
inconsistent
test
standard
violated
secretary
says
either
actual
practice
making
deductions
employment
policy
creates
significant
likelihood
regulation
critical
phrase
subject
comfortably
bears
meaning
secretary
assigns
interpretation
test
plainly
erroneous
thus
controlling
robertson
methow
valley
citizens
council
secretary
interpretation
rendered
unworthy
deference
fact
set
forth
amicus
brief
position
adopted
response
litigation
reason
suspect
reflect
secretary
fair
considered
judgment
rule
requiring
flsa
exemptions
narrowly
construed
employers
apply
rule
governs
judicial
interpretation
statutes
regulations
limit
secretary
power
resolve
ambiguities
regulations
pp
regulations
entitle
employers
preserve
exempt
status
employees
subjected
pay
deductions
inconsistent
salary
basis
test
reimbursing
employees
promising
comply
test
future
long
deductions
question
either
inadvertent
made
reasons
lack
work
pp
affirmed
scalia
delivered
opinion
unanimous
notice
opinion
subject
formal
revision
publication
preliminary
print
reports
readers
requested
notify
reporter
decisions
wash
ington
typographical
formal
errors
order
corrections
may
made
preliminary
print
goes
press
francis
bernard
auer
et
petitioners
david
robbins
et
al
writ
certiorari
appeals
eighth
circuit
february
justice
scalia
delivered
opinion
fair
labor
standards
act
flsa
stat
amended
et
exempts
bona
fide
executive
administrative
professional
employees
overtime
pay
requirements
case
presents
question
whether
secretary
labor
salary
basis
test
determining
employee
exempt
status
reflects
permissible
reading
statute
applies
public
sector
employees
also
consider
whether
secretary
reasonably
interpreted
salary
basis
test
deny
employee
salaried
status
thus
grant
overtime
pay
compensation
may
practical
matter
adjusted
ways
inconsistent
test
petitioners
sergeants
lieutenant
employed
louis
police
department
brought
suit
respondents
members
louis
board
police
commissioners
seeking
payment
overtime
pay
claimed
owed
flsa
respondents
argued
petitioners
entitled
pay
came
within
exemption
provided
bona
fide
executive
administrative
professional
employees
regulations
promulgated
secretary
one
requirement
exempt
status
employee
earn
specified
minimum
amount
salary
basis
cfr
according
regulations
employee
considered
paid
salary
basis
employment
agreement
regularly
receives
pay
period
weekly
less
frequent
basis
predetermined
amount
constituting
part
compensation
amount
subject
reduction
variations
quality
quantity
work
performed
petitioners
contended
salary
basis
test
met
case
terms
louis
metropolitan
police
department
manual
compensation
reduced
variety
disciplinary
infractions
related
quality
quantity
work
performed
petitioners
also
claimed
meet
requirement
exempt
status
duties
executive
administrative
professional
nature
see
district
found
petitioners
paid
salary
basis
though
also
satisfied
duties
criterion
appeals
affirmed
part
reversed
part
holding
salary
basis
test
duties
test
satisfied
petitioners
granted
certiorari
flsa
grants
secretary
broad
authority
defin
delimi
scope
exemption
executive
administrative
professional
employees
secretary
chosen
approach
exempt
status
requires
employee
paid
salary
basis
turn
requires
compensation
subject
reduction
variations
quality
quantity
work
performed
cfr
regulation
goes
carve
exception
rule
enalties
imposed
infractions
safety
rules
major
significance
clear
rule
embraces
reductions
pay
disciplinary
violations
secretary
view
employees
whose
pay
adjusted
disciplinary
reasons
deserve
exempt
status
general
matter
true
executive
administrative
professional
employees
disciplined
piecemeal
deductions
pay
terminated
demoted
given
restricted
assignments
flsa
apply
state
local
employees
salary
basis
test
adopted
see
ed
fed
reg
salary
basis
test
congress
extended
flsa
coverage
virtually
public
sector
employees
pub
stat
held
exercise
power
consistent
tenthamendment
garcia
san
antonio
metropolitan
transit
authority
overruling
national
league
cities
usery
salary
basis
test
existed
largely
present
form
since
see
fed
reg
expressly
applicable
public
sector
employees
see
cfr
respondents
concede
flsa
may
validly
applied
public
sector
also
raise
general
challenge
secretary
reliance
salary
basis
test
contend
however
disciplinary
deductions
element
salary
basis
test
invalid
public
sector
employees
applied
reflects
unreasonable
interpretation
statutory
exemption
say
ability
adjust
public
sector
employees
pay
even
executive
administrative
professional
employees
pay
means
enforcing
compliance
work
rules
necessary
component
effective
government
public
sector
context
contend
fewer
disciplinary
alternatives
deductions
pay
available
congress
directly
spoken
precise
question
issue
must
sustain
secretary
approach
long
based
permissible
construction
statute
chevron
natural
resources
defense
council
respondents
objections
perhaps
support
different
application
salary
basis
test
public
employees
conclude
compel
secretary
view
public
employers
differently
situated
regard
disciplining
employees
require
wholesale
revision
time
tested
rule
simply
said
unreasonable
agree
seventh
circuit
principle
public
administration
drawn
attention
makes
imperative
public
sector
employers
ability
toimpose
disciplinary
pay
deductions
individuals
employed
genuine
executive
administrative
professional
capacities
mueller
reich
cert
pending
respondents
appeal
quasi
military
nature
law
enforcement
agencies
louis
police
department
ability
use
full
range
disciplinary
tools
even
relatively
senior
law
enforcement
personnel
essential
say
maintaining
control
discipline
organizations
human
lives
line
daily
far
clear
however
pay
deduction
form
discipline
example
placing
offending
officer
restricted
duties
necessary
effect
flsa
entrusts
matters
judgment
secretary
federal
courts
say
disciplinary
deduction
rule
invalid
applied
law
enforcement
personnel
fundamental
objection
respondents
disciplinary
deduction
rule
procedural
one
secretary
failed
give
adequate
consideration
whether
really
makes
sense
apply
rule
public
sector
respondents
amici
make
claim
specific
secretary
failure
revisit
rule
wake
garcia
decision
arbitrary
capricious
violation
administrative
procedure
act
apa
certainly
true
application
disciplinary
deduction
rule
public
sector
employees
raises
distinct
issues
may
warrant
secretary
formal
consideration
much
suggested
veritable
flood
post
garcia
litigation
public
employers
area
see
carpenter
denver
cert
pending
bankston
illinois
shockley
newport
atlanta
professional
firefighters
union
local
atlanta
respondents
complaints
failure
amend
disciplinary
deduction
rule
raised
first
instance
present
suit
may
certainly
asked
parties
respondents
position
disregard
agency
regulation
contrary
substantive
requirements
law
one
appears
public
record
issued
violation
procedural
prerequisites
notice
comment
requirements
apa
claim
regulation
substantively
unlawful
even
violates
clear
procedural
prerequisite
rather
arbitrary
capricious
conduct
amendatory
rulemaking
might
well
resulted
change
basis
set
aside
agency
action
prior
application
relief
addressed
agency
proper
procedure
pursuit
respondents
grievance
set
forth
explicitly
apa
petition
agency
rulemaking
denial
must
justified
statement
reasons
appealed
courts
primary
issue
litigation
unleashed
application
salary
basis
test
public
sector
employees
whether
test
employee
pay
subject
disciplinary
deductions
whenever
exists
theoretical
possibility
deductions
rather
something
suggest
employee
actually
vulnerable
pay
reduced
petitioners
effect
argue
something
close
former
view
contend
police
manual
nominally
subjects
department
employees
range
disciplinary
sanctions
thatincludes
disciplinary
deductions
pay
single
sergeant
actually
subjected
disciplinary
deduction
subject
deductions
hence
nonexempt
flsa
appeals
rejected
petitioners
approach
saying
mere
possibility
improper
deduction
pay
defeat
employee
salaried
status
practice
making
deductions
exists
appeals
view
one
time
incident
disciplinary
deduction
taken
unique
circumstances
defeat
salaried
status
employees
case
sergeant
question
violated
residency
rule
agreed
reduction
pay
alternative
termination
employment
requirement
actual
deductions
also
imposed
earlier
ruling
eighth
circuit
mcdonnell
omaha
cert
denied
eleventh
circuit
case
atlanta
professional
firefighters
union
local
atlanta
supra
circuits
rejected
requirement
yourman
dinkins
cert
pending
carpenter
denver
supra
bankston
illinois
supra
kinney
district
columbia
cadc
abshire
county
kern
cert
denied
else
imposed
requirement
actual
deductions
face
vagueness
ambiguity
governing
policy
michigan
assn
governmental
employees
michigan
dept
corrections
secretary
labor
amicus
brief
filed
request
interprets
salary
basis
test
todeny
exempt
status
employees
covered
policy
permits
disciplinary
deductions
pay
practical
matter
standard
met
secretary
says
either
actual
practice
making
deductions
employment
policy
creates
significant
likelihood
deductions
secretary
approach
rejects
wooden
requirement
actual
deductions
absence
requires
clear
particularized
policy
one
effectively
communicates
deductions
made
specified
circumstances
avoids
imposition
massive
unanticipated
overtime
liability
including
possibility
substantial
liquidated
damages
see
kinney
district
columbia
supra
situations
vague
broadly
worded
policy
nominally
applicable
whole
range
personnel
significantly
likely
invoked
salaried
employees
salary
basis
test
creature
secretary
regulations
interpretation
jurisprudence
controlling
unless
plainly
erroneous
inconsistent
regulation
robertson
methow
valley
citizens
council
quoting
bowles
seminole
rock
sand
deferential
standard
easily
met
critical
phrase
subject
comfortably
bears
meaning
secretary
assigns
see
american
heritage
dictionary
ed
def
defining
subject
mean
prone
disposed
giving
example
child
subject
colds
webster
new
international
dictionary
ed
def
defining
subject
mean
xposed
liable
prone
disposed
giving
example
country
subject
extreme
heat
secretary
approach
usefully
illustrated
reference
case
policy
petitioners
rely
contained
section
police
manual
lists
total
possible
rule
violations
specifies
therange
penalties
associated
department
employees
nominally
covered
manual
specified
penalties
involve
disciplinary
deductions
pay
secretary
view
enough
render
petitioners
pay
subject
disciplinary
deductions
within
meaning
salary
basis
test
manual
effectively
communicate
pay
deductions
anticipated
form
punishment
employees
petitioners
category
since
perfectly
possible
give
full
effect
every
aspect
manual
without
drawing
inference
sort
statement
available
penalties
applied
solely
petitioners
matters
different
since
applies
petitioners
employees
unquestionably
paid
salary
basis
expressed
availability
disciplinary
deductions
may
reference
latter
clear
inference
drawn
likelihood
sanction
applied
employees
petitioners
secretary
approach
likelihood
established
one
time
deduction
sergeant
pay
unusual
circumstances
petitioners
complain
secretary
interpretation
comes
us
form
legal
brief
circumstances
case
make
unworthy
deference
secretary
position
sense
post
hoc
rationalizatio
advanced
agency
seeking
defend
past
agency
action
attack
bowen
georgetown
univ
hospital
simply
reason
suspect
interpretation
reflect
agency
fair
considered
judgment
matter
question
petitioners
also
suggest
secretary
approach
contravenes
rule
flsa
exemptions
narrowly
construed
employers
withheld
except
persons
plainly
unmistakably
within
terms
spirit
arnold
ben
kanowsky
rule
governing
judicial
interpretation
statutes
regulations
limitation
secretary
power
resolve
ambiguities
regulations
rule
requiring
secretary
construe
regulations
narrowly
make
little
sense
since
free
write
regulations
broadly
wishes
subject
limits
imposed
statute
one
small
issue
remains
unresolved
effect
upon
exempt
status
sergeant
guzy
officer
violated
residency
requirement
one
time
reduction
pay
secretary
regulations
provide
deductions
inconsistent
salary
basis
test
deduction
guzy
pay
made
circumstances
indicating
intention
pay
employee
salary
basis
exemption
flsa
applicable
entire
period
deductions
made
cfr
conversely
deduction
permitted
salary
basis
test
inadvertent
made
reasons
lack
work
exemption
considered
lost
employer
reimburses
employee
deductions
promises
comply
future
ibid
petitioners
contend
initial
condition
latter
provision
enables
employer
take
corrective
action
satisfied
deduction
guzy
pay
inadvertent
inadvertent
true
enough
plain
language
regulation
sets
inadverten
ce
made
reasons
lack
work
alternative
grounds
permitting
corrective
action
petitioners
also
contend
corrective
provision
unavailable
respondents
guzy
yet
reimbursed
theresidency
based
deduction
petitioners
view
reimbursement
must
made
immediately
upon
discovery
improper
deduction
made
language
regulation
however
address
timing
reimbursement
secretary
amicus
brief
informs
us
interpret
require
immediate
payment
respondents
entitled
preserve
guzy
exempt
status
complying
corrective
provision
petitioners
argued
finally
respondents
failed
carry
affirmative
burden
establishing
petitioners
exempt
status
even
secretary
interpretation
salary
basis
test
since
however
argument
inadequately
preserved
prior
proceedings
consider
see
adickes
kress
judgment
appeals
affirmed
ordered
footnotes
respondents
contend
district
lacked
jurisdiction
petitioners
suit
virtue
eleventh
amendment
board
police
commissioners
however
share
immunity
state
missouri
governor
appoints
four
board
five
members
mo
rev
stat
city
ofst
louis
responsible
board
financial
liabilities
board
subject
state
direction
control
respect
therefore
arm
state
eleventh
amendment
purposes
hess
port
authority
trans
hudson
lake
country
estates
tahoe
regional
planning
agency
petitioners
also
contend
additional
sergeants
actually
subjected
disciplinary
deductions
fact
established
portions
record
petitioners
cite