et
al
playboy
entertainment
group
argued
november
decided
may
section
telecommunications
act
requires
cable
television
operators
providing
channels
primarily
dedicated
programming
either
fully
scramble
otherwise
fully
block
channels
limit
transmission
hours
children
unlikely
viewing
set
administrative
regulation
even
enactment
cable
operators
used
signal
scrambling
limit
access
certain
programs
paying
customers
scrambling
imprecise
however
either
audio
visual
portions
scrambled
programs
might
heard
seen
phenomenon
known
signal
bleed
purpose
shield
children
hearing
seeing
images
resulting
signal
bleed
comply
majority
cable
operators
adopted
time
channeling
approach
day
viewers
service
areas
receive
programming
question
appellee
playboy
entertainment
group
filed
suit
challenging
constitutionality
district
concluded
restriction
speech
violates
first
amendment
government
might
interests
less
restrictive
ways
one
plausible
less
restrictive
alternative
found
act
requires
cable
operator
pon
request
cable
service
subscriber
without
charge
fully
scramble
otherwise
fully
block
channel
subscriber
wish
receive
long
subscribers
knew
opportunity
reasoned
provide
much
protection
unwanted
programming
held
government
failed
prove
least
restrictive
means
addressing
real
problem
district
err
holding
statute
violative
first
amendment
pp
two
points
understood
many
adults
find
material
issue
highly
offensive
considering
material
comes
unwanted
homes
children
might
see
hear
parental
wishes
consent
legitimate
reasons
regulating
playboy
programming
first
amendment
protection
section
regulation
also
singles
particular
programmers
regulation
moment
statute
impose
complete
prohibition
since
stand
satisfies
strict
scrutiny
sable
communications
fcc
must
narrowly
tailored
promote
compelling
government
interest
less
restrictive
alternative
serve
government
purpose
legislature
must
use
alternative
cable
television
like
broadcast
media
presents
unique
problems
even
speech
indecent
enters
home
objective
shielding
children
suffice
support
blanket
ban
protection
obtained
less
restrictive
alternative
moreover
key
difference
cable
television
broadcasting
media
cable
systems
capacity
block
unwanted
channels
basis
targeted
blocking
less
restrictive
banning
government
ban
speech
targeted
blocking
feasible
effective
means
furthering
compelling
interests
pp
one
disputes
narrowly
tailored
government
goal
supporting
parents
want
sexually
explicit
channels
blocked
question
whether
effective
despite
empirical
evidence
generated
requests
blocking
period
sole
federal
blocking
statute
effect
district
correctly
concluded
publicized
adequate
manner
serve
effective
less
restrictive
means
reaching
government
goals
government
restricts
speech
government
bears
burden
proving
constitutionality
actions
greater
new
orleans
broadcasting
three
explanations
lack
individual
blocking
requests
individual
blocking
might
effective
alternative
due
technological
limitations
although
adequately
advertised
blocking
provision
might
effective
written
require
sufficient
notice
make
actual
signal
bleed
problem
might
far
less
concern
government
first
supposed
government
show
first
right
answer
according
district
however
first
third
possibilities
equally
consistent
record
record
clear
whether
enough
notice
issued
give
fighting
chance
unless
district
findings
clearly
erroneous
tie
goes
free
expression
regard
signal
bleed
district
thorough
discussion
exposes
central
weakness
government
proof
little
hard
evidence
widespread
serious
problem
proof
likely
child
view
discernible
explicit
image
proof
duration
bleed
quality
pictures
sound
sanctionable
signal
bleed
include
instances
fleeting
image
appearing
screen
seconds
first
amendment
requires
careful
assessment
characterization
evil
order
justify
regulation
sweeping
government
failed
establish
pervasive
nationwide
problem
justifying
nationwide
daytime
speech
ban
government
also
failed
prove
adequate
notice
ineffective
evidence
voluntary
blocking
provision
capable
least
informing
parents
signal
bleed
yet
aware
rights
bleed
blocked
consider
problem
yet
controlled
assume
plausible
less
restrictive
alternative
ineffective
presume
parents
given
full
information
fail
act
government
also
argues
society
independent
interests
unserved
parents
fail
act
information
even
upon
assumption
government
interest
substituting
informed
empowered
parents
interest
sufficiently
compelling
justify
widespread
restriction
speech
regulatory
alternative
publicized
real
possibility
promoting
open
disclosure
choice
effective
blocking
system
provide
parents
information
needed
engage
active
supervision
government
shown
alternative
insufficient
secure
objective
overriding
harm
justifies
intervention
although
voluntary
blocking
regime
even
adequate
notice
children
exposed
signal
bleed
children
also
exposed
time
channeling
eliminate
signal
bleed
around
clock
record
silent
comparative
effectiveness
two
alternatives
pp
supp
affirmed
kennedy
delivered
opinion
stevens
souter
thomas
ginsburg
joined
stevens
thomas
filed
concurring
opinions
scalia
filed
dissenting
opinion
breyer
filed
dissenting
opinion
rehnquist
scalia
joined
et
appellants
playboy
entertainment
group
appeal
district
district
delaware
may
justice
kennedy
delivered
opinion
case
presents
challenge
telecommunications
act
pub
stat
supp
iii
section
requires
cable
television
operators
provide
channels
primarily
dedicated
programming
either
fully
scramble
otherwise
fully
block
channels
limit
transmission
hours
children
unlikely
viewing
set
administrative
regulation
time
supp
iii
cfr
even
enactment
statute
signal
scrambling
already
use
cable
operators
used
scrambling
regular
course
business
paying
customers
access
certain
programs
scrambling
imprecise
however
either
audio
visual
portions
scrambled
programs
might
heard
seen
phenomenon
known
signal
bleed
purpose
shield
children
hearing
seeing
images
resulting
signal
bleed
comply
statute
majority
cable
operators
adopted
second
time
channeling
approach
effect
widespread
adoption
time
channeling
eliminate
altogether
transmission
targeted
programming
outside
safe
harbor
period
affected
cable
service
areas
words
day
household
service
areas
receive
programming
whether
household
viewer
wanted
appellee
playboy
entertainment
group
challenged
statute
unnecessarily
restrictive
legislation
violative
first
amendment
trial
district
concluded
regime
viewers
order
signal
blocking
basis
presented
effective
less
restrictive
alternative
supp
del
finding
error
conclusion
affirm
playboy
entertainment
group
owns
prepares
programs
adult
television
networks
including
playboy
television
spice
playboy
transmits
programming
cable
television
operators
retransmit
subscribers
either
monthly
subscriptions
premium
channels
basis
cable
operators
transmit
playboy
signal
like
premium
channel
signals
scrambled
form
operators
provide
paying
subscribers
addressable
converter
box
placed
home
television
set
converter
permits
viewer
see
hear
descrambled
signal
conceded
almost
playboy
programming
consists
sexually
explicit
material
defined
statute
statute
enacted
scrambling
technology
perfect
analog
cable
television
systems
may
use
either
rf
baseband
scrambling
systems
may
prevent
signal
bleed
discernible
pictures
may
appear
time
time
scrambled
screen
furthermore
listener
might
hear
audio
portion
program
imperfections
inevitable
problem
present
appears
economical
convert
simpler
rf
baseband
scrambling
systems
alternative
scrambling
technologies
systemwide
scale
digital
technology
may
one
day
provide
another
solution
presents
bleed
problem
indeed
digital
systems
projected
become
technology
choice
eliminate
signal
bleed
problem
digital
technology
yet
widespread
use
however
imperfect
scrambling
viewers
paid
receive
playboy
channels
may
happen
across
discernible
images
sexually
explicit
nature
many
viewers
discernible
scene
sound
often
may
occur
issue
case
section
enacted
address
signal
bleed
phenomenon
noted
statute
implementing
regulations
require
cable
operators
either
scramble
sexually
explicit
channel
full
limit
channel
programming
hours
supp
iii
cfr
section
added
floor
amendment
without
significant
debate
telecommunications
act
act
major
legislative
effort
designed
reduce
regulation
encourage
rapid
deployment
new
telecommunications
technologies
reno
american
civil
liberties
union
quoting
stat
act
includes
seven
titles
six
product
extensive
committee
hearings
subject
discussion
reports
prepared
committees
senate
house
representatives
reno
supra
section
found
title
act
known
communications
decency
act
cda
stat
section
become
effective
march
days
act
signed
president
note
following
supp
iii
march
playboy
obtained
temporary
restraining
order
tro
enjoining
enforcement
supp
del
brought
suit
district
pursuant
act
stat
note
following
supp
iii
playboy
sought
declaration
violates
constitution
injunction
prohibiting
law
enforcement
district
denied
playboy
preliminary
injunction
supp
del
summarily
affirmed
tro
lifted
federal
communications
commission
announced
begin
enforcing
may
implementation
section
telecommunications
act
fcc
rcd
statute
became
operative
cable
operators
practical
choice
curtail
targeted
programming
regulated
sixteen
hours
risk
penalties
imposed
audio
video
signal
bleed
occur
red
times
supp
majority
operators
one
survey
complied
time
channeling
targeted
programmers
ibid
since
adult
programming
viewed
households
prior
result
significant
restriction
communication
corresponding
reduction
playboy
revenues
ibid
march
district
held
full
trial
concluded
violates
first
amendment
supp
district
observed
imposed
restriction
speech
agreed
interests
statute
advanced
compelling
concluded
government
might
interests
less
restrictive
ways
one
plausible
less
restrictive
alternative
found
another
section
act
requires
cable
operator
pon
request
cable
service
subscriber
without
charge
fully
scramble
otherwise
fully
block
channel
subscriber
wish
receive
stat
supp
iii
long
subscribers
knew
opportunity
reasoned
provide
much
protection
unwanted
programming
supp
time
content
neutral
less
restrictive
playboy
first
amendment
rights
ibid
described
adequate
notice
include
suggesting
operators
communicate
subscribers
information
certain
channels
broadcast
programming
signal
bleed
may
appear
children
may
view
signal
bleed
without
parents
knowledge
permission
channel
blocking
devices
available
free
charge
request
free
device
made
telephone
call
operator
means
providing
notice
include
inserts
monthly
billing
statements
barker
channels
preview
channels
programming
coming
advertisement
channels
one
broadcasting
sexually
explicit
programming
ibid
added
notice
conveyed
regular
basis
reasonable
intervals
include
notice
changes
channel
alignments
ibid
district
concluded
supplemented
effective
less
restrictive
alternative
consequently
declared
unconstitutional
enjoined
enforcement
also
required
playboy
insist
notice
provisions
contracts
cable
operators
ibid
filed
direct
appeal
pursuant
district
thereafter
dismissed
lack
jurisdiction
two
motions
filed
government
app
juris
statement
noted
probable
jurisdiction
affirm
ii
two
essential
points
understood
concerning
speech
issue
first
shall
assume
many
adults
find
material
highly
offensive
consider
circumstance
material
comes
unwanted
homes
children
might
see
hear
parental
wishes
consent
legitimate
reasons
regulating
second
parties
bring
case
us
premise
playboy
programming
first
amendment
protection
case
litigated
alleged
obscene
adults
constitutional
right
view
government
disclaims
interest
preventing
children
seeing
hearing
consent
parents
playboy
concomitant
rights
first
amendment
transmit
points
undisputed
speech
question
defined
content
statute
seeks
restrict
content
based
section
applies
channels
primarily
dedicated
sexually
explicit
adult
programming
programming
indecent
statute
unconcerned
signal
bleed
channels
see
section
apply
signal
bleed
occurs
premium
channel
networks
like
hbo
disney
channel
overriding
justification
regulation
concern
effect
subject
matter
young
viewers
section
justified
without
reference
content
regulated
speech
ward
rock
racism
quoting
clark
community
creative
emphasis
deleted
focuses
content
speech
direct
impact
speech
listeners
boos
barry
opinion
essence
regulation
single
particular
programming
content
regulation
also
singles
particular
programmers
speech
question
thought
congress
harmful
channels
subject
restriction
instead
statutory
disability
applies
channels
primarily
dedicated
programming
supp
iii
one
sponsor
measure
even
identified
appellee
name
see
cong
rec
statement
feinstein
noting
statute
apply
channels
playboy
spice
channels
laws
designed
intended
suppress
restrict
expression
specific
speakers
contradict
basic
first
amendment
principles
section
limited
playboy
market
penalty
programming
choice
though
channels
capable
transmitting
like
material
altogether
exempt
effect
federal
statute
protected
speech
apparent
evident
reasonable
way
substantial
number
cable
operators
comply
letter
time
channel
silences
protected
speech
day
every
home
cable
service
area
regardless
presence
likely
presence
children
wishes
viewers
according
district
adult
programming
viewed
households
prior
period
begins
supp
prohibit
much
speech
significant
restriction
communication
speakers
willing
adult
listeners
communication
enjoys
first
amendment
protection
moment
statute
impose
complete
prohibition
distinction
laws
burdening
laws
banning
speech
matter
degree
government
burdens
must
satisfy
rigorous
scrutiny
bans
since
speech
restriction
stand
satisfies
strict
scrutiny
sable
communications
fcc
statute
regulates
speech
based
content
must
narrowly
tailored
promote
compelling
government
interest
ibid
less
restrictive
alternative
serve
government
purpose
legislature
must
use
alternative
reno
cda
internet
indecency
provisions
burden
adult
speech
unacceptable
less
restrictive
alternatives
least
effective
achieving
legitimate
purpose
statute
enacted
serve
sable
communications
supra
government
may
regulate
content
constitutionally
protected
speech
order
promote
compelling
interest
chooses
least
restrictive
means
articulated
interest
otherwise
restrict
speech
without
adequate
justification
course
first
amendment
permit
precedents
teach
principles
designed
benefit
speech
restriction
shield
sensibilities
listeners
general
rule
right
expression
prevails
even
less
restrictive
alternative
exists
expected
protect
sensibilities
simply
averting
eyes
cohen
california
accord
erznoznik
jacksonville
course
consider
images
transmitted
homes
wanted
parents
often
present
give
immediate
guidance
cable
television
like
broadcast
media
presents
unique
problems
inform
assessment
interests
stake
may
justify
restrictions
unacceptable
contexts
see
denver
area
ed
telecommunications
consortium
fcc
plurality
opinion
kennedy
concurring
part
concurring
judgment
part
dissenting
part
fcc
pacifica
foundation
one
suggests
government
must
indifferent
unwanted
indecent
speech
comes
home
without
parental
consent
speech
agree
protected
speech
question
standard
government
must
meet
order
restrict
consider
regulation
answer
clear
standard
strict
scrutiny
case
involves
speech
alone
even
speech
indecent
enters
home
objective
shielding
children
suffice
support
blanket
ban
protection
accomplished
less
restrictive
alternative
sable
communications
instance
feasibility
technological
approach
controlling
minors
access
messages
required
invalidation
complete
statutory
ban
medium
upholding
statute
whereby
householder
may
insulate
advertisements
offer
sale
matter
addressee
sole
discretion
believes
erotically
arousing
sexually
provocative
quoting
supp
iv
bolger
youngs
drug
products
rejecting
blanket
ban
mailing
unsolicited
contraceptive
advertisements
compare
also
ginsberg
new
york
upholding
state
statute
barring
sale
minors
material
defined
obscene
basis
appeal
butler
michigan
rejecting
blanket
ban
material
tending
incite
minors
violent
depraved
immoral
acts
manifestly
tending
corruption
morals
youth
quoting
mich
penal
code
cases
arose
different
context
sable
communications
reno
instance
also
note
affirmative
steps
necessary
obtain
access
indecent
material
via
media
issue
provide
necessary
instruction
complying
accepted
first
amendment
principles
zoning
cases
hand
irrelevant
question
post
breyer
dissenting
citing
renton
playtime
theatres
young
american
mini
theatres
made
clear
lesser
scrutiny
afforded
regulations
targeting
secondary
effects
crime
declining
property
values
application
regulations
targeting
primary
effects
protected
speech
reno
supra
boos
statute
us
dens
speech
content
must
receive
strict
scrutiny
moreover
key
difference
cable
television
broadcasting
media
point
case
turns
cable
systems
capacity
block
unwanted
channels
basis
option
block
reduces
likelihood
concerning
pacifica
supra
traditional
first
amendment
scrutiny
deprive
government
authority
address
sort
problem
corollary
course
targeted
blocking
enables
government
support
parental
authority
without
affecting
first
amendment
interests
speakers
willing
listeners
listeners
speech
unpopular
indecent
privacy
homes
may
optimal
place
receipt
simply
put
targeted
blocking
less
restrictive
banning
government
ban
speech
targeted
blocking
feasible
effective
means
furthering
compelling
interests
say
absence
effective
blocking
mechanism
cases
suffice
support
law
restricting
speech
question
less
restrictive
means
available
government
achieve
goals
government
must
use
iii
district
concluded
less
restrictive
alternative
available
adequate
publicity
supp
one
disputes
requires
cable
operators
block
undesired
channels
individual
households
upon
request
narrowly
tailored
government
goal
supporting
parents
want
channels
blocked
question
whether
effective
plausible
less
restrictive
alternative
offered
speech
restriction
government
obligation
prove
alternative
ineffective
achieve
goals
government
met
burden
support
position
government
cites
empirical
evidence
showing
promulgated
implemented
trial
generated
requests
blocking
march
may
government
enjoined
enforcing
remained
operation
survey
cable
operators
determined
fewer
cable
subscribers
requested
full
blocking
time
uncomfortable
fact
sole
blocking
regulation
effect
year
public
greeted
collective
yawn
district
correct
direct
attention
import
tepid
response
placing
burden
proof
upon
government
district
examined
whether
capable
serving
effective
less
restrictive
means
reaching
government
goals
concluded
publicized
adequate
manner
district
employed
proper
approach
government
restricts
speech
government
bears
burden
proving
constitutionality
actions
greater
new
orleans
broadcasting
government
bears
burden
identifying
substantial
interest
justifying
challenged
restriction
reno
governmental
body
seeking
sustain
restriction
commercial
speech
must
demonstrate
harms
recites
real
restriction
fact
alleviate
material
degree
board
trustees
state
univ
fox
state
bears
burden
justifying
restrictions
tinker
des
moines
independent
community
school
order
state
justify
prohibition
particular
expression
opinion
must
able
show
action
caused
something
mere
desire
avoid
discomfort
unpleasantness
always
accompany
unpopular
viewpoint
government
seeks
restrict
speech
based
content
usual
presumption
constitutionality
afforded
congressional
enactments
reversed
regulations
presumptively
invalid
paul
government
bears
burden
rebut
presumption
good
reason
line
speech
unconditionally
guaranteed
speech
may
legitimately
regulated
suppressed
punished
finely
drawn
speiser
randall
error
marking
line
exacts
extraordinary
cost
speech
convictions
beliefs
influenced
expressed
tested
speech
bring
beliefs
bear
government
society
speech
personalities
formed
expressed
citizen
entitled
seek
reject
certain
ideas
influences
without
government
interference
control
student
first
encounters
free
speech
jurisprudence
might
think
influenced
philosophy
one
idea
good
art
literature
objective
standards
style
taste
decorum
beauty
esthetics
deemed
constitution
inappropriate
indeed
unattainable
quite
opposite
true
constitution
enforces
relativistic
philosophy
moral
nihilism
point
view
constitution
exists
precisely
opinions
judgments
including
esthetic
moral
judgments
art
literature
formed
tested
expressed
constitution
says
judgments
individual
make
government
decree
even
mandate
approval
majority
technology
expands
capacity
choose
denies
potential
revolution
assume
government
best
positioned
make
choices
us
rare
regulation
restricting
speech
content
ever
permissible
indeed
give
government
benefit
doubt
attempted
restrict
speech
risk
leaving
regulations
place
sought
shape
unique
personalities
silence
dissenting
ideas
first
amendment
compliance
point
proved
risk
operative
trials
must
rest
government
citizen
burden
mind
district
explored
three
explanations
lack
individual
blocking
requests
supp
first
individual
blocking
might
effective
alternative
due
technological
limitations
second
although
adequately
advertised
blocking
provision
might
effective
written
require
sufficient
notice
make
third
actual
signal
bleed
problem
might
far
less
concern
government
first
supposed
ibid
sustain
statute
government
required
show
first
right
answer
according
district
however
first
third
possibilities
equally
consistent
record
ibid
second
record
clear
whether
enough
notice
issued
give
fighting
chance
ibid
case
best
draw
unless
district
findings
clearly
erroneous
tie
goes
free
expression
district
began
problem
signal
bleed
concluding
government
convinced
us
signal
bleed
pervasive
problem
district
thorough
discussion
exposes
central
weakness
government
proof
little
hard
evidence
widespread
serious
problem
signal
bleed
indeed
proof
likely
child
view
discernible
explicit
image
proof
duration
bleed
quality
pictures
sound
say
millions
children
subject
risk
viewing
signal
bleed
one
thing
avoid
articulating
true
nature
extent
risk
quite
another
sanctionable
signal
bleed
include
instances
fleeting
image
appearing
screen
seconds
first
amendment
requires
careful
assessment
characterization
evil
order
justify
regulation
sweeping
although
parties
taken
additional
step
lodging
assortment
videotapes
show
quite
explicit
bleeding
show
television
static
snow
attempt
explanation
context
discussion
instance
extent
particular
tape
representative
appears
screens
nationwide
government
relied
trial
anecdotal
evidence
support
regulation
district
summarized
follows
government
presented
evidence
two
city
councillors
eighteen
individuals
one
senator
officials
one
city
complained
either
cable
operator
local
congressman
fcc
viewing
signal
bleed
television
instance
local
cable
operator
offered
fact
rectify
situation
free
exception
individual
varying
degrees
rapidity
included
complaints
additional
concern
parents
might
aware
children
exposed
problem
addition
government
presented
evidence
child
exposed
signal
bleed
friend
house
cindy
omlin
set
lockout
feature
remote
control
prevent
child
tuning
adult
channels
eleven
year
old
son
nevertheless
exposed
signal
bleed
attended
slumber
party
friend
house
government
presented
evidence
handful
isolated
incidents
years
since
playboy
started
broadcasting
government
presented
evidence
magnitude
problem
record
citations
omitted
spurred
district
express
request
specific
evidence
problem
see
government
also
presented
expert
spreadsheet
estimate
million
homes
million
children
potential
exposed
signal
bleed
supp
government
made
attempt
confirm
accuracy
estimate
surveys
field
tests
however
accordingly
district
discounted
figures
made
finding
government
presented
evidence
number
households
actually
exposed
signal
bleed
thus
quantified
actual
extent
problem
signal
bleed
finding
clearly
erroneous
indeed
required
went
effect
course
significant
percentage
cable
operators
felt
necessary
time
channel
sexually
explicit
programmers
indication
scrambling
technology
yet
perfected
say
however
scrambling
completely
ineffective
different
cable
systems
use
different
scrambling
systems
vary
dependability
severity
problem
varies
time
time
place
place
depending
weather
quality
equipment
installation
maintenance
even
good
end
spectrum
system
might
bleed
extent
sufficient
trigger
requirement
cautious
cable
operator
statute
requires
signal
fully
block
ed
supp
iii
emphasis
added
rational
cable
operator
faced
possibility
sanctions
intermittent
bleeding
well
choose
time
channel
even
bleeding
momentary
pose
concern
households
affirm
government
failed
prove
existence
problem
time
observing
statute
imposes
severe
burden
speech
consistent
analysis
cases
require
probative
evidence
record
differentiates
among
extent
bleed
individual
households
evidence
otherwise
quantifies
signal
bleed
problem
addition
solutions
programmable
televisions
vcr
mapping
systems
display
blue
screen
tuned
scrambled
signal
may
eliminate
signal
bleed
consumer
end
cable
supp
playboy
made
point
trial
government
estimate
failed
account
factors
without
sort
field
survey
impossible
know
widespread
problem
fact
indicator
record
handful
complaints
cf
turner
broadcasting
system
fcc
reviewing
record
tens
thousands
pages
evidence
developed
three
years
hearings
well
additional
expert
submissions
sworn
declarations
testimony
industry
documents
support
complex
provisions
number
children
transfixed
even
flickering
pornographic
television
images
fact
reached
millions
like
district
expected
directed
handful
complaints
support
restriction
found
near
barren
legislative
record
relevant
provision
section
added
act
floor
amendment
accompanied
brief
statements
without
committee
hearing
debate
see
cong
rec
one
measure
sponsors
indicate
considered
time
channeling
superior
voluntary
blocking
put
burden
action
subscriber
cable
company
statement
feinstein
sole
conclusory
statement
however
tells
little
relative
efficacy
voluntary
blocking
versus
time
channeling
offering
unhelpful
generality
voluntary
measures
require
voluntary
action
declined
rely
similar
evidence
see
sable
communications
side
conclusory
statements
debates
proponents
bill
congressional
record
presented
us
contains
evidence
effective
ineffective
regulations
might
prove
omitted
reno
suggest
page
record
must
compiled
every
case
government
must
delay
acting
address
real
problem
government
must
present
anecdote
supposition
question
whether
actual
problem
proven
case
agree
government
failed
establish
pervasive
nationwide
problem
justifying
nationwide
daytime
speech
ban
district
err
second
conclusion
government
also
failed
prove
adequate
notice
ineffective
alternative
district
invited
government
produce
proof
see
blocking
option
promoted
become
meaningful
alternative
provisions
time
permanent
injunction
hearing
evidence
actual
predicted
impact
efficacy
helpful
us
government
fell
short
see
supp
government
argument
ineffective
premised
adequate
notice
subscribers
clear
however
record
notices
provisions
adequate
evidence
voluntary
blocking
provision
capable
least
informing
parents
signal
bleed
yet
aware
rights
bleed
blocked
consider
problem
yet
controlled
government
finds
least
two
problems
conclusion
district
first
government
takes
issue
district
reliance
without
proof
hypothetical
enhanced
version
section
brief
et
al
district
obligation
however
predict
extent
improved
notice
scheme
improve
government
presented
plausible
less
restrictive
alternative
prove
alternative
ineffective
least
restrictive
available
means
indeed
extent
district
erred
attempting
implement
less
restrictive
alternative
judicial
decree
requiring
playboy
provide
expanded
notice
cable
service
contracts
appropriate
remedy
repair
statute
enjoin
speech
restriction
given
existence
less
restrictive
means
legislature
wished
improve
statute
perhaps
process
giving
careful
consideration
alternatives
government
also
contends
publicized
restrictive
theory
cost
installing
blocking
devices
outstrip
revenues
distributing
playboy
programming
lead
cancellation
see
supp
conclusion
rests
assumption
sufficient
percentage
households
informed
potential
signal
bleed
consider
enough
problem
order
blocking
devices
assumption
support
record
noted
furthermore
playboy
willing
incur
costs
effective
one
might
infer
playboy
believes
advertised
ineffective
object
one
might
infer
company
believes
signal
bleed
problem
widespread
absence
proof
assume
former
response
voluntary
blocking
requires
consumer
take
action
may
inconvenient
may
go
perfectly
every
time
assume
plausible
less
restrictive
alternative
ineffective
presume
parents
given
full
information
fail
act
unresponsive
operators
concern
moreover
notice
statute
give
cable
operators
ample
incentive
fines
penalties
noncompliance
respond
blocking
requests
prompt
efficient
fashion
adduced
evidence
district
showing
adequately
advertised
effective
aid
desirous
parents
keeping
signal
bleed
households
government
cite
nothing
record
support
point
government
instead
takes
quite
different
approach
offhand
suggestion
success
highly
unlikely
government
sets
point
aside
arguing
instead
society
independent
interests
unserved
parents
fail
act
information
brief
et
al
nder
enhanced
version
section
parents
strong
feelings
matter
see
children
view
signal
bleed
least
homes
even
enhanced
version
section
succeed
blocking
signal
bleed
parents
affirmatively
decided
avail
means
offered
certainly
parents
perhaps
large
number
parents
inertia
indifference
distraction
simply
take
action
block
signal
bleed
even
fully
informed
problem
even
offered
relatively
easy
solution
reply
brief
et
al
society
interest
course
served
instances
parents
request
blocking
enhanced
section
cases
parents
fail
make
use
enhanced
section
procedure
distraction
inertia
indifference
section
means
protect
society
independent
interest
even
upon
assumption
government
interest
substituting
informed
empowered
parents
interest
sufficiently
compelling
justify
widespread
restriction
speech
government
argument
stems
idea
parents
know
children
viewing
material
scale
frequency
cause
concern
parents
want
take
affirmative
steps
block
decisions
superseded
assumptions
established
event
assumptions
apply
regime
option
blocking
explained
whole
point
publicized
advise
parents
indecent
material
may
shown
afford
opportunity
block
times
even
home
even
time
channeling
offer
assistance
regulatory
alternative
publicized
real
possibility
promoting
open
disclosure
choice
effective
blocking
system
provide
parents
information
needed
engage
active
supervision
government
shown
alternative
regime
added
communication
support
insufficient
secure
objective
overriding
harm
justifies
intervention
little
doubt
course
voluntary
blocking
regime
even
adequate
notice
children
exposed
signal
bleed
need
discount
possibility
graphic
image
negative
impact
young
child
must
remembered
however
children
exposed
signal
bleed
time
channeling
well
time
channeling
unlike
blocking
eliminate
signal
bleed
around
clock
adolescents
may
unsupervised
outside
households
hardly
unknown
unsupervised
front
television
set
record
silent
comparative
effectiveness
two
alternatives
basic
speech
principles
stake
case
purpose
design
statute
regulate
speech
reason
content
special
consideration
latitude
accorded
government
merely
law
somehow
described
burden
rather
outright
suppression
influenced
moreover
perception
regulation
question
major
one
speech
important
history
law
free
expression
one
vindication
cases
involving
speech
many
citizens
may
find
shabby
offensive
even
ugly
follows
restrictions
speech
must
give
us
moment
pause
television
broadcasts
expose
children
real
risk
harmful
exposure
indecent
materials
even
home
without
parental
consent
problem
government
address
must
however
way
consistent
first
amendment
principles
government
met
burden
first
amendment
imposes
government
failed
show
least
restrictive
means
addressing
real
problem
district
err
holding
statute
violative
first
amendment
light
ruling
unnecessary
address
second
question
presented
whether
district
divested
jurisdiction
consider
government
postjudgment
motions
government
filed
notice
appeal
judgment
district
affirmed
ordered
appendix
opinion
section
telecommunications
act
pub
stat
supp
iii
provides
relevant
part
requirement
providing
sexually
explicit
adult
programming
programming
indecent
channel
service
primarily
dedicated
programming
multichannel
video
programming
distributor
shall
fully
scramble
otherwise
fully
block
video
audio
portion
channel
one
subscriber
channel
programming
receive
implementation
multichannel
video
programming
distributor
complies
requirement
set
forth
subsection
section
distributor
shall
limit
access
children
programming
referred
subsection
providing
programming
hours
day
determined
commission
significant
number
children
likely
view
scramble
defined
used
section
term
scramble
means
rearrange
content
signal
programming
programming
viewed
heard
understandable
manner
section
telecommunications
act
pub
stat
supp
iii
provides
relevant
part
subscriber
request
upon
request
cable
service
subscriber
cable
operator
shall
without
charge
fully
scramble
otherwise
fully
block
audio
video
programming
channel
carrying
programming
one
subscriber
receive
scramble
defined
used
section
term
scramble
means
rearrange
content
signal
programming
programming
viewed
heard
understandable
manner
et
appellants
playboy
entertainment
group
appeal
district
district
delaware
may
justice
stevens
concurring
justice
scalia
advanced
argument
parties
addressed
brief
response
order
relying
ginzburg
justice
scalia
treat
programs
whose
content
assumes
protected
first
amendment
though
obscene
way
advertised
four
separate
dissenting
opinions
ginzburg
authored
justices
black
harlan
douglas
stewart
amply
demonstrated
untenable
character
ginzburg
decision
rendered
ginzburg
theory
obscenity
legal
fiction
premised
upon
logical
advertising
bareheaded
dancer
topless
might
deceptive
make
performance
obscene
explained
dissent
splawn
california
ginzburg
decided
extended
first
amendment
protection
commercial
speech
virginia
bd
pharmacy
virginia
citizens
consumer
council
justice
scalia
proposal
thus
anachronistic
also
overlooks
key
premise
upon
commercial
speech
cases
based
first
amendment
assumes
general
matter
information
harmful
people
perceive
best
interests
well
enough
informed
best
means
end
open
channels
communication
rather
close
fact
programs
marketed
playboy
offensive
many
viewers
provides
justification
protecting
penalizing
truthful
statements
content
et
appellants
playboy
entertainment
group
appeal
district
district
delaware
may
justice
thomas
concurring
seem
respect
least
cable
programming
affected
telecommunications
act
government
ample
constitutional
statutory
authority
prohibit
broadcast
entirely
governmental
restriction
distribution
obscene
materials
receives
first
amendment
scrutiny
roth
though
perhaps
programming
issue
case
obscene
defined
term
miller
california
one
fairly
conclude
standards
applicable
many
communities
programming
meets
miller
test
government
empowered
statute
sanction
broadcasts
criminal
penalties
see
supp
iii
whoever
transmits
cable
system
matter
obscene
otherwise
unprotected
constitution
shall
fined
title
imprisoned
years
however
points
case
litigated
assumption
programming
issue
obscene
merely
indecent
factual
finding
materials
issue
fact
obscene
indeed
district
described
materials
indecent
obscene
supp
del
government
challenge
characterization
tr
oral
arg
instead
asks
ratify
statute
assumption
protected
speech
unwilling
absence
factual
findings
advocacy
position
rely
view
relevant
programming
obscene
remains
assumption
programming
restricted
obscene
merely
indecent
government
declined
defend
statute
regulation
obscenity
asks
us
dilute
stringent
first
amendment
standards
uphold
proper
regulation
protected
rather
unprotected
speech
see
brief
appellants
arguing
traditional
strict
scrutiny
apply
unwilling
corrupt
first
amendment
reach
result
starch
constitutional
standards
sacrificed
accommodate
enforcement
choices
government
see
denver
area
ed
telecommunications
consortium
fcc
souter
concurring
reviewing
speech
regulations
fairly
strict
categorical
rules
keeps
starch
standards
moments
daily
politics
cries
loudest
limiting
may
said
applying
first
amendment
exacting
standards
correctly
determined
upheld
theory
argued
government
accordingly
join
opinion
et
appellants
playboy
entertainment
group
appeal
district
district
delaware
may
justice
scalia
dissenting
agree
principal
dissent
case
telecommunications
act
pub
stat
supp
iii
supported
compelling
state
interest
narrowly
tailored
write
separately
express
view
upheld
simpler
fashion
finding
regulates
business
obscenity
sure
federal
communications
commission
implementing
regulation
see
cfr
purport
capture
programming
indecent
rather
merely
obscene
assume
purposes
discussion
though
highly
fanciful
assumption
none
transmissions
issue
independently
crosses
boundary
established
obscenity
see
miller
california
individual
programs
enjoy
first
amendment
protection
view
however
assumption
put
end
inquiry
recognized
commercial
entities
engage
sordid
business
pandering
deliberately
emphasiz
ing
sexually
provocative
aspects
nonobscene
products
order
catch
salaciously
disposed
engage
constitutionally
unprotected
behavior
ginzburg
see
also
dallas
scalia
concurring
part
dissenting
part
pinkus
splawn
california
hamling
cf
jacobellis
ohio
warren
dissenting
opinion
use
various
materials
put
words
pictures
must
considered
determining
whether
materials
obscene
whether
products
business
traffics
independently
meet
high
hurdle
established
delineating
obscene
contain
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
miller
supra
see
ginzburg
permissive
government
regulation
circumstances
clear
context
exchanges
businesses
customers
occur
neither
merchant
buyer
interested
work
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
deliberate
representation
petitioner
publications
erotically
arousing
stimulate
reader
accept
prurient
looks
titillation
saving
intellectual
content
thus
business
offer
hardcore
sexual
material
constant
intentional
objective
business
seek
promote
finds
sanctuary
first
amendment
supra
scalia
concurring
part
dissenting
part
section
regulates
sort
business
coverage
limited
programming
describes
depicts
sexual
excretory
activities
organs
patently
offensive
manner
measured
contemporary
community
standards
cable
television
cfr
emphasis
added
furthermore
applies
channels
primarily
dedicated
programming
emphasis
added
conceivable
suppose
channel
primarily
dedicated
sex
might
hold
forth
primarily
dedicated
sex
case
productions
contain
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
entitled
first
amendment
protection
statuary
rooms
national
gallery
competitive
world
cable
programming
possibility
channel
devoted
sex
advertise
sufficiently
remote
number
channels
sufficiently
small
indeed
nonexistent
render
provision
substantially
playboy
illustrates
type
business
designed
reach
playboy
provides
networks
playboy
television
adultvision
adam
eve
spice
virtually
sexually
explicit
adult
programming
supp
del
example
spice
network
playboy
describes
programming
depicting
activities
female
sex
oral
record
exh
one
expect
given
content
playboy
advertises
accordingly
calls
enjoy
sexiest
hottest
adult
movies
privacy
home
exh
example
promotion
particular
movie
follows
little
miss
country
girls
aching
quick
roll
hay
watch
southern
hospitality
pull
stops
ravin
nymphos
tear
barn
light
big
country
sky
exh
one
may
doubt
whether
marvel
sort
embarrassingly
juvenile
promotion
really
attracts
playboy
assures
us
adult
audience
certainly
marketing
thus
agree
justice
breyer
analysis
leaves
feeling
conclusion
al
capone
accurately
report
income
children
protected
occasional
uninvited
exposure
appellee
calls
programming
section
covers
businesses
engage
commercial
exploitation
erotica
solely
sake
prurient
appeal
ginzburg
supra
playboy
advertisements
make
plain
adult
programming
contexts
contemporary
american
society
chosen
permit
commercial
exploitation
may
wise
democratic
choice
difficulty
many
contexts
though
one
identifying
panderer
sex
however
course
compelled
constitution
since
government
entirely
free
block
transmissions
may
certainly
take
less
drastic
step
dictating
times
may
occur
et
appellants
playboy
entertainment
group
appeal
district
district
delaware
may
justice
breyer
chief
justice
justice
justice
scalia
join
dissenting
case
involves
application
elucidation
first
amendment
principles
apply
established
first
amendment
law
statute
focuses
upon
broadcast
sexually
explicit
adult
programming
adultvision
adam
eve
spice
playboy
cable
channels
channels
statute
requires
primarily
dedicated
programming
telecommunications
act
pub
stat
supp
iii
section
forbids
cable
operators
sending
adult
channels
homes
viewers
request
practice
requires
significant
number
cable
operators
either
upgrade
scrambling
technology
avoid
broadcasting
channels
daylight
evening
hours
must
decide
whether
first
amendment
permits
congress
enact
statute
basic
applicable
first
amendment
principles
issue
must
examine
statute
us
great
care
determine
whether
restrictions
justified
compelling
interest
namely
interest
limiting
children
access
sexually
explicit
material
recognizes
legislature
must
respect
adults
viewing
freedom
narrowly
tailoring
statute
restricts
speech
necessary
choosing
instead
alternative
compelling
interest
less
restrictive
least
effective
way
see
ante
reno
american
civil
liberties
union
applying
principles
majority
invalidates
two
reasons
finds
government
failed
establish
pervasive
nationwide
problem
justifying
nationwide
daytime
speech
ban
ante
government
failed
prove
ineffective
ness
alternative
namely
notified
viewers
requesting
broadcaster
sexually
explicit
material
stop
sending
ante
view
record
supports
neither
reason
outset
describe
statutory
scheme
somewhat
differently
majority
emphasize
three
background
points
first
statutory
scheme
reflects
congressional
effort
control
incomplete
scrambling
previously
federal
law
left
cable
operators
free
decide
whether
transmit
adult
channels
channel
operators
decided
send
adult
channels
subscriber
home
except
request
operators
implemented
decision
inexpensive
technology
signal
bleeding
scrambling
technology
either
inadvertently
way
enticement
allowed
non
subscribers
see
hear
going
congress
decided
act
senator
dianne
feinstein
present
statute
legislative
cosponsor
pointed
numerous
cable
operators
across
country
still
automatically
broadcasting
sexually
explicit
programming
households
across
america
regardless
whether
parents
want
subscribers
want
cong
rec
complained
industry
taken
baby
steps
address
problem
voluntary
policies
simply
recommend
action
adding
problem
uniform
laws
regulations
govern
sexually
explicit
adult
programming
cable
television
consequently
proposed
congress
enacted
present
statute
statute
carefully
tailored
respect
viewer
preferences
regulates
transmissions
creating
two
default
rules
applicable
unless
subscriber
decides
otherwise
section
requires
cable
operator
fully
scramble
channel
whether
broadcasts
adult
programming
subscriber
asks
receive
section
requires
cable
operator
fully
scramble
every
adult
channel
unless
subscriber
asks
receive
taken
together
two
provisions
create
scheme
permits
subscribers
choose
see
want
law
creates
different
default
assumption
silent
subscribers
section
assumes
silent
subscriber
wants
see
ordinary
non
adult
channels
cable
operator
includes
bundle
sent
home
section
assumes
silent
subscriber
want
receive
adult
channels
consequently
subscriber
wishing
view
adult
channel
must
opt
specifically
request
channel
see
subscriber
wishing
view
channel
sent
home
must
opt
see
scheme
addresses
signal
bleed
indirectly
statute
perspective
signal
bleeding
failure
fully
rearrange
content
signal
programming
viewed
heard
understandable
manner
amounts
transmission
home
hence
bleeding
violates
statute
whenever
clear
transmission
unrequested
adult
channel
violate
statute
second
majority
characterization
statutory
scheme
prohibit
ing
speech
exaggeration
ante
rather
statute
places
burden
adult
channel
speech
requiring
relevant
cable
operator
either
use
better
scrambling
technology
technology
expensive
broadcast
laws
burden
speech
say
making
speech
less
profitable
may
create
serious
first
amendment
issues
equivalent
absolute
ban
speech
cf
nixon
shrink
missouri
government
pac
thus
upheld
laws
ban
access
adults
sexually
explicit
speech
burden
access
geographical
temporal
zoning
see
renton
playtime
theatres
fcc
pacifica
foundation
young
american
mini
theatres
also
recognized
material
first
amendment
guarantees
adults
right
see
may
suitable
children
consequently
held
legislatures
maintain
limited
power
protect
children
restricting
access
banning
adult
material
compare
ginsberg
new
york
upholding
ban
sale
pornographic
magazines
minors
butler
michigan
invalidating
ban
books
unfit
minors
see
also
denver
area
ed
telecommunications
consortium
fcc
plurality
opinion
pacifica
foundation
supra
reno
supra
concurring
part
dissenting
part
difference
imposing
burden
enacting
ban
matter
even
strict
first
amendment
rules
issue
third
case
concerns
regulation
commercial
actors
broadcast
virtually
sexually
explicit
material
supp
del
channels
broadcast
trivial
amounts
serious
material
birth
control
information
artistic
images
visual
equivalents
classical
serious
literature
case
therefore
present
kind
narrow
tailoring
concerns
seen
cases
see
reno
breadth
statutue
coverage
wholly
unprecedented
cover
large
amounts
non
pornographic
material
serious
educational
value
butler
supra
invalidating
ban
books
tending
corruption
morals
background
mind
reader
better
understand
basic
disagreement
two
conclusions
ii
majority
first
concludes
government
failed
prove
seriousness
problem
receipt
adult
channels
children
whose
parents
request
broadcast
ante
claim
wrong
one
thing
parties
concede
basic
rf
scrambling
scramble
audio
portion
program
supp
another
playboy
conducted
survey
cable
operators
asked
system
full
compliance
section
discernible
audio
video
bleed
question
cable
operators
answered
see
def
exh
record
government
expert
took
number
homes
subscribing
playboy
spice
multiplied
fraction
cable
households
children
average
number
children
per
household
found
million
children
potentially
exposed
audio
video
bleed
adult
programming
def
exh
record
even
discounting
systems
might
considered
full
compliance
left
million
children
homes
faulty
scrambling
systems
see
course
record
contains
additional
anecdotal
evidence
concerns
expressed
elected
officials
probative
larger
problem
see
supp
see
also
cong
rec
add
empirical
evidence
majority
statement
cable
operators
practical
choice
adult
programming
switching
nighttime
transmission
adult
channels
ante
emphasis
added
quoting
supp
signal
bleed
significant
empirical
problem
light
cost
cure
must
many
cable
operators
switch
night
time
hours
realistic
answer
question
think
realistic
imagine
signal
bleed
occurs
enough
make
cable
operators
skittish
without
also
significantly
exposing
children
images
see
ante
majority
suggests
signal
bleed
problem
significant
also
significant
burden
speech
created
majority
evidence
ways
given
logical
difficulty
quantity
empirical
evidence
majority
still
believes
government
proved
case
imposes
burden
upon
government
beyond
suggested
first
amendment
case
aware
iii
majority
second
claim
government
failed
demonstrate
absence
less
restrictive
alternative
presents
closer
question
specific
question
whether
amounts
less
restrictive
similarly
practical
effective
way
accomplish
objective
reno
tells
us
less
restrictive
alternative
must
least
effective
achieving
legitimate
purpose
statute
enacted
serve
words
emphasized
similarly
effective
critical
appropriate
case
ask
judge
apply
first
amendment
rules
mechanically
decide
whether
light
benefits
potential
alternatives
statute
works
harm
adult
speech
proportion
benefits
statute
seeks
provide
child
protection
words
imply
degree
leeway
however
small
legislature
chooses
among
possible
alternatives
light
predicted
comparative
effects
without
empirical
leeway
undoubted
ability
lawyers
judges
imagine
kind
slightly
less
drastic
restrictive
approach
make
impossible
write
laws
deal
harm
called
statute
justice
blackmun
pointed
judge
unimaginative
indeed
come
something
little
less
drastic
little
less
restrictive
almost
situation
thereby
enable
vote
strike
legislation
illinois
bd
elections
socialist
workers
party
concurring
opinion
used
without
sense
practical
choices
face
legislatures
test
merely
announces
inevitable
negative
result
test
test
majority
describing
first
amendment
jurisprudence
scarcely
mentions
words
least
effective
rather
surprising
omission
since
happen
case
majority
refer
reno
understanding
less
restrictive
alternatives
ante
addresses
governments
effectiveness
arguments
ante
therefore
assume
continues
recognize
role
part
test
enunciates
turn
major
point
disagreement
unlike
majority
believe
record
makes
clear
similarly
effective
alternative
section
work
differently
order
achieve
different
legislative
objectives
section
gives
parents
power
tell
cable
operators
keep
channel
home
section
unless
parents
explicitly
consent
inhibits
transmission
adult
cable
channels
children
whose
parents
may
unaware
watching
whose
parents
easily
supervise
television
viewing
habits
whose
parents
know
rights
whose
parents
simply
unavailable
critical
times
respect
serves
interests
laws
deny
children
access
adult
cabarets
movies
del
code
tit
code
ann
laws
act
absence
direct
parental
supervision
legislative
objective
perfectly
legitimate
million
school
age
children
parents
parent
work
force
least
million
children
left
alone
home
without
supervision
week
children
may
spend
afternoons
evenings
watching
television
outside
home
friends
offers
independent
protection
large
number
families
see
dept
education
office
research
improvement
bringing
education
hours
summer
disagree
majority
implies
government
independent
interest
offering
protection
preventing
say
child
watching
virulent
pornography
without
parental
consent
might
compelling
ante
previous
case
protection
children
issue
suggested
thing
indeed
say
precisely
opposite
see
reno
ginsberg
make
clear
government
compelling
interest
helping
parents
preventing
minors
accessing
sexually
explicit
materials
absence
parental
supervision
see
ginsberg
supra
definition
nothing
compelling
interest
described
similarly
effective
alternative
record
moreover
sets
forth
empirical
evidence
showing
two
laws
equivalent
respect
government
objectives
majority
observes
months
government
enjoined
enforcing
fewer
cable
subscribers
requested
full
blocking
ante
majority
describes
public
reaction
collective
yawn
adding
government
failed
prove
yawn
reflected
anything
lack
serious
signal
bleed
problem
lack
notice
better
information
might
cure
record
excludes
first
possibility
least
respect
exposure
discussed
see
supra
doubt
public
though
may
well
consider
ing
habits
adults
matter
personal
choice
yawn
exposure
question
concerns
young
children
absence
parental
consent
sexually
explicit
material
issue
see
ante
scalia
dissenting
neither
record
neutral
respect
curative
power
better
notice
section
right
works
parents
become
aware
rights
discover
children
watching
signal
bleed
reach
cable
operator
ask
block
sending
signal
home
await
installation
individual
blocking
device
perhaps
block
fails
channel
number
changes
make
new
request
better
notice
rights
little
help
parents
discover
children
viewing
habits
step
two
nothing
respect
steps
three
five
yet
record
contains
considerable
evidence
problems
matter
evidence
endlessly
delayed
phone
call
responses
faulty
installations
blocking
failures
mishaps
leaving
steps
significant
obstacles
see
deposition
cavalier
civ
action
pp
like
calling
utilities
sit
wait
wait
phone
took
hree
weeks
numerous
phone
calls
time
call
cox
cable
get
different
stories
telephonic
deposition
bennett
two
failed
installations
recall
calling
said
well
guess
something
going
live
district
actual
plan
better
notice
plan
makes
concrete
majority
better
notice
requirement
fraught
difficulties
district
ordered
playboy
insist
cable
operators
place
notice
inserts
monthly
billing
statements
barker
channels
advertising
supp
one
say
placing
one
insert
monthly
billing
statement
stuffed
others
calling
additional
attention
adult
channels
notice
barker
channels
make
small
difference
importantly
interfere
extent
cable
operators
freedom
decide
broadcast
district
supervise
contracts
thousands
cable
operators
embody
requirement
even
better
notice
adequately
inform
viewers
rights
exercise
rights
subscriber
base
raise
playboy
costs
point
playboy
forced
air
entirely
supp
consequence
seem
anyone
interest
free
speech
majority
resting
earlier
conclusion
signal
bleed
widespread
denies
likelihood
viewers
need
earlier
conclusion
unsound
see
supra
majority
also
relies
fact
playboy
presumably
aware
economic
interests
willing
incur
costs
effective
ante
yet
denial
majority
admits
may
simply
reflect
playboy
knowledge
even
better
notice
work
section
similarly
effective
alternative
respect
government
interest
protecting
children
unless
minimal
number
viewers
actually
use
yet
economic
evidence
shows
playboy
programming
totally
eliminated
majority
provides
answer
argument
opinion
evidence
sufficient
dispose
case
course
logically
possible
better
notice
bring
near
perfect
parental
knowledge
children
watch
rights
cable
operators
respond
rapidly
blocking
requests
still
informed
parents
decided
adult
channels
blocked
free
probability
remote
possibility
occur
neither
draw
tie
ante
fact
sufficient
government
met
burden
proof
considerations
show
even
plan
better
notice
similarly
effective
achieving
legitimate
goals
statute
enacted
serve
iv
section
raises
cost
adult
channel
broadcasting
restricts
ban
adult
speech
adults
may
continue
watch
adult
channels
though
less
conveniently
watching
night
recording
programs
vcr
subscribing
digital
cable
better
blocking
systems
cf
renton
upholding
zoning
rules
force
potential
adult
theatre
patrons
travel
less
convenient
locations
government
justification
imposing
restriction
limiting
access
children
channels
cast
virtually
sexually
explicit
material
compelling
record
shows
similarly
effective
less
restrictive
alternative
consequently
restriction
viewed
light
proposed
alternative
proportionate
need
say
restricts
speech
necessary
compelling
need
taken
together
considerations
lead
conclusion
lawful
repeat
disagreement
majority
lies
fact
view
government
satisfied
burden
proof
particular
proved
existence
serious
problem
comparative
ineffectiveness
resolving
problem
disagreement
allocation
first
amendment
burdens
proof
basic
first
amendment
principle
importance
amendment
scheme
government
see
ante
first
amendment
standards
rigorous
safeguard
speech
also
permit
congress
enact
law
increases
costs
associated
certain
speech
serves
compelling
interest
served
adoption
less
restrictive
similarly
effective
alternative
standards
strictest
make
difficult
government
prevail
make
impossible
government
prevail
majority
however
applied
standards
without
making
realistic
assessment
alternatives
thereby
threatens
leave
congress
without
power
help
millions
parents
want
expose
children
commercial
pornography
remain
ill
served
chosen
remedy
worse
still
logic
majority
comparison
holding
problem
established
seem
apply
whether
bleeding
totally
unscrambled
transmission
issue
public
depend
solely
upon
voluntary
conduct
cable
channel
operators
avert
considerably
greater
harm
case
law
mandate
result
contrary
pointed
prior
cases
recognize
protection
children
issue
first
amendment
poses
barrier
properly
high
insurmountable
difficult
reconcile
today
decision
foundational
cases
upheld
similar
laws
fcc
pacifica
foundation
ginsberg
new
york
difficult
distinguish
cases
striking
laws
either
applied
far
broadly
narrow
regulation
adult
channels
see
reno
american
civil
liberties
union
imposed
total
ban
form
adult
speech
see
sable
communications
fcc
bolger
youngs
drug
products
less
restrictive
similarly
effective
alternative
otherwise
available
see
denver
area
satisfactory
answer
say
justice
thomas
government
remains
free
prosecute
obscenity
laws
ante
obscenity
exception
permits
censorship
communication
even
among
adults
see
miller
california
must
kept
narrow
lest
government
improperly
interfere
communication
choices
adults
freely
made
rely
primarily
upon
law
bans
speech
adults
overlook
special
need
protect
children
congress
taken
seriously
importance
maintaining
adult
access
sexually
explicit
channels
issue
tailored
restrictions
minimize
impact
upon
adults
offering
parents
help
keeping
unwanted
transmissions
children
finding
adequate
alternatives
none
reduces
congress
protective
power
vanishing
point
first
amendment
demands
respectfully
dissent
footnotes
referring
unscrambled
programming
playboy
spice
channels
examples
lodged
government
also
lodged
videotapes
containing
signal
bleed
channels
assume
unscrambled
programming
channels
obscene
scrambled
discernible
images
programs
obscene
well
fact
examples
signal
bleed
contained
record
may
fall
within
definition
obscenity
easily
unscrambled
programming
difficult
dispute
signal
bleed
lacks
serious
literary
artistic
political
scientific
value
miller
california
footnotes
congress
attempt
limit
reach
therefore
contrary
contention
see
ante
virtue
rather
vice
justice
stevens
misapprehends
several
respects
nature
test
apply
first
mistakenly
believes
nature
advertising
controls
obscenity
analysis
regardless
nature
material
advertised
entirely
agree
advertising
bareheaded
dancer
topless
might
deceptive
make
performance
obscene
ante
concurring
opinion
believe
however
material
patently
offensive
advertised
little
reason
think
proffered
socially
redeeming
value
justice
stevens
second
misapprehension
flows
first
sees
test
apply
incompatible
jurisprudence
see
ante
concurring
opinion
see
also
splawn
california
stevens
dissenting
ginzburg
survive
virginia
bd
pharmacy
virginia
citizens
consumer
council
conflict
although
ginzburg
test
like
obscenity
tests
ordinarily
applied
commercial
context
purveyors
obscenity
business
money
logic
restricted
context
test
applies
equally
improbable
case
collector
indecent
materials
wishes
give
away
takes
classified
ad
local
newspaper
touting
salacious
appeal
commercial
motive
ircumstances
dissemination
relevant
determining
whether
social
importance
claimed
material
pretense
reality
splawn
supra
quoting
jury
instruction
approved
perhaps
splawn
accept
justice
stevens
claim
incompatibility
see
ante
justice
thomas
see
ante
concurring
opinion
find
great
importance
fact
case
litigated
assumption
programming
issue
obscene
merely
indecent
see
ibid
emphasis
deleted
noted
dallas
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
allowed
parties
litigating
positions
place
limits
upon
development
obscenity
law
see
miller
california
abandoning
utterly
without
redeeming
social
value
test
sua
sponte
ginzburg
adopting
pandering
theory
unargued
government
mishkin
new
york
upholding
convictions
theory
obscenity
defined
looking
intent
disseminator
despite
respondent
express
disavowal
theory
justice
thomas
concern
factual
finding
obscenity
case
see
ante
concurring
opinion
challenge
issue
whether
particular
course
conduct
constitutes
obscenity
facial
challenge
issue
whether
terms
statute
address
obscenity
factfinder