eisen
carlisle
jacquelin
argued
february
decided
may
petitioner
brought
class
action
fed
rule
civ
proc
behalf
traders
new
york
stock
exchange
certain
period
charging
respondent
brokerage
firms
handled
exchange
business
respondent
exchange
violating
antitrust
securities
laws
followed
series
decisions
district
appeals
district
ultimately
decided
suit
maintained
class
action
finding
two
quarter
million
members
prospective
class
identified
name
address
reasonable
effort
cost
send
individual
notice
proposed
notification
scheme
providing
individual
notice
limited
number
prospective
class
members
notice
publication
remainder
district
held
preliminary
hearing
merits
finding
petitioner
likely
prevail
trial
ruled
respondents
bear
costs
notification
scheme
appeals
reversed
ordered
suit
dismissed
class
action
disapproving
district
partial
reliance
publication
notice
appeals
held
rule
required
individual
notice
identifiable
class
members
district
authority
hold
preliminary
hearing
merits
purpose
allocating
notice
costs
entire
notice
expense
fall
petitioner
proposed
class
action
unmanageable
rule
petitioner
contends
appeals
jurisdiction
review
district
orders
appeals
decided
issues
incorrectly
held
district
resolution
notice
problems
constituted
final
decision
within
meaning
therefore
appealable
right
section
pp
section
limit
appellate
review
final
judgments
terminate
action
rather
requirement
finality
given
practical
rather
technical
construction
cohen
beneficial
loan
pp
district
decision
respondents
lawfully
required
bear
costs
notice
involved
collateral
matter
unrelated
merits
petitioner
claims
final
disposition
claimed
right
ingredient
cause
action
require
consideration
cohen
supra
district
resolution
notice
problems
failed
comply
notice
requirement
rule
pp
express
language
intent
rule
leave
doubt
individual
notice
must
sent
class
members
identified
reasonable
effort
nothing
show
individual
notice
mailed
two
quarter
million
class
members
whose
names
addresses
easily
ascertainable
class
members
individual
notice
clearly
best
notice
practicable
within
meaning
rule
pp
facts
cost
sending
individual
notices
prohibitively
high
petitioner
stake
matter
individual
notice
might
unnecessary
prospective
class
member
large
enough
stake
justify
separate
litigation
individual
claim
dispense
requirement
since
individual
notice
identifiable
class
members
discretionary
consideration
waived
particular
case
unambiguous
requirement
rule
pp
adequate
representation
satisfy
rule
since
rule
speaks
notice
well
adequacy
representation
requires
provided
otherwise
notice
published
otherwise
required
case
pp
petitioner
must
bear
cost
notice
members
class
improper
district
impose
part
cost
respondents
pp
nothing
either
language
history
rule
gives
authority
conduct
preliminary
inquiry
merits
suit
order
determine
whether
may
maintained
class
action
indeed
procedure
contravenes
rule
allowing
representative
plaintiff
secure
benefits
class
action
without
first
satisfying
requirements
rule
pp
preliminary
determination
merits
may
substantially
prejudice
defendant
since
unaccompanied
traditional
rules
procedures
applicable
civil
trials
relationship
parties
truly
adversary
plaintiff
must
pay
cost
notice
part
ordinary
burden
financing
suit
pp
powell
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
white
blackmun
rehnquist
joined
douglas
filed
opinion
dissenting
part
brennan
marshall
joined
post
aaron
fine
argued
cause
petitioner
briefs
mordecai
rosenfeld
harold
kohn
devereux
milburn
william
eldred
jackson
argued
cause
respondents
briefs
louis
stanton
russell
brooks
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
reversal
filed
louis
lefkowitz
attorney
general
pro
se
samuel
hirshowitz
first
assistant
attorney
general
george
zuckerman
arnold
fleischer
assistant
attorneys
general
attorney
general
new
york
israel
packel
attorney
general
lawrence
silver
gerry
elman
deputy
attorneys
general
david
berger
commonwealth
pennsylvania
evelle
younger
attorney
general
anthony
joseph
assistant
attorney
general
michael
spiegel
deputy
attorney
general
state
california
william
baxley
attorney
general
alabama
norman
gorsuch
attorney
general
alaska
gary
nelson
attorney
general
arizona
arthur
bolton
attorney
general
georgia
ed
hancock
attorney
general
kentucky
robert
quinn
attorney
general
leo
schwartz
special
assistant
attorney
general
massachusetts
john
danforth
attorney
general
missouri
allen
olson
attorney
general
north
dakota
richard
israel
attorney
general
rhode
island
kimberly
cheney
attorney
general
vermont
robert
shevin
attorney
general
florida
richard
turner
attorney
general
iowa
william
guste
attorney
general
louisiana
summer
attorney
general
mississippi
louis
lefkowitz
attorney
general
new
york
larry
derryberry
attorney
general
oklahoma
kermit
sande
attorney
general
south
dakota
andrew
miller
attorney
general
virginia
david
shapiro
james
vanr
springer
state
alabama
et
al
sheldon
burman
new
york
state
trial
lawyers
assn
edward
pollock
leonard
sacks
stephen
zetterberg
california
trial
lawyers
assn
melvin
wulf
burt
neuborne
american
civil
liberties
union
jack
greenberg
james
nabrit
iii
charles
stephen
ralston
eric
schnapper
naacp
legal
defense
educational
fund
alan
morrison
public
citizen
consumers
union
briefs
amici
curiae
urging
affirmance
filed
william
falkenhainer
rollin
woodbury
southern
california
edison
samuel
gates
dwight
buss
ralph
mcafee
carl
schuck
marvin
schwartz
william
simon
george
spiegelberg
philip
strubing
american
college
trial
lawyers
justice
powell
delivered
opinion
may
petitioner
filed
class
action
behalf
traders
new
york
stock
exchange
exchange
complaint
charged
respondents
violations
antitrust
securities
laws
demanded
damages
petitioner
class
eight
years
elapsed
trial
merits
claims
parties
courts
still
wrestling
complex
questions
surrounding
petitioner
attempt
maintain
suit
class
action
fed
rule
civ
proc
granted
certiorari
resolve
difficulties
petitioner
brought
class
action
district
southern
district
new
york
originally
sued
behalf
buyers
sellers
odd
lots
exchange
subsequently
class
limited
traded
odd
lots
period
may
june
throughout
period
trading
part
exchange
regular
auction
market
handled
exclusively
special
dealers
bought
sold
accounts
principals
respondent
brokerage
firms
carlisle
jacquelin
decoppet
doremus
together
handled
exchange
business
report
special
study
securities
markets
doc
pt
compensated
differential
surcharge
imposed
investor
addition
standard
brokerage
commission
applicable
transactions
period
question
differential
point
per
share
stocks
trading
per
share
point
per
share
stocks
trading
per
share
petitioner
charged
respondent
brokerage
firms
monopolized
trading
set
differential
excessive
level
violation
sherman
act
demanded
treble
damages
amount
overcharge
petitioner
also
demanded
unspecified
money
damages
exchange
alleged
failure
regulate
differential
protection
investors
violation
securities
exchange
act
finally
requested
attorneys
fees
injunctive
prohibition
future
excessive
charges
critical
fact
litigation
petitioner
individual
stake
damages
award
seeks
competent
attorney
undertake
complex
antitrust
action
recover
inconsequential
amount
economic
reality
dictates
petitioner
suit
proceed
class
action
opposing
counsel
therefore
engaged
prolonged
combat
various
requirements
rule
result
exceedingly
complicated
series
decisions
district
appeals
second
circuit
understand
labyrinthian
history
litigation
preliminary
overview
decisions
may
prove
useful
beginning
district
determined
petitioner
suit
maintainable
class
action
appeal
appeals
issued
two
decisions
known
popularly
eisen
eisen
ii
first
held
district
decision
final
order
thus
appealable
second
appeals
intimated
petitioner
suit
satisfy
requirements
rule
remanded
case
permit
district
consider
matter
conducting
several
evidentiary
hearings
remand
district
decided
suit
maintained
class
action
entered
orders
intended
fulfill
notice
requirements
rule
case
appealed
appeals
issued
decision
eisen
iii
ended
trilogy
denying
class
action
status
petitioner
suit
review
developments
detail
eisen
eisen
ii
addition
meeting
four
conjunctive
requirements
class
action
must
also
qualify
one
three
subdivisions
petitioner
argued
suit
maintainable
class
action
three
subdivisions
appeals
held
first
two
subdivisions
inapplicable
suit
therefore
turned
attention
third
subdivision
subdivision
requires
determine
whether
questions
law
fact
common
members
class
predominate
questions
affecting
individual
members
whether
class
action
superior
available
methods
fair
efficient
adjudication
controversy
specifically
identifies
four
factors
relevant
inquiries
detailed
review
provisions
appeals
concluded
potential
barrier
maintenance
suit
class
action
rule
directive
evaluate
difficulties
likely
encountered
management
class
action
commonly
referred
manageability
consideration
encompasses
whole
range
practical
problems
may
render
class
action
format
inappropriate
particular
suit
reference
litigation
appeals
noted
difficulties
distributing
ultimate
recovery
class
members
formidable
though
necessarily
insuperable
commented
reluctant
permit
actions
proceed
likely
benefit
anyone
lawyers
bring
therefore
directed
district
conduct
inquiry
order
consider
mechanics
involved
administration
present
action
ibid
finally
appeals
turned
imposing
obstacle
class
action
notice
requirement
rule
district
held
rule
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
required
individual
notice
class
members
identified
petitioner
objected
mailed
notice
entire
class
prohibitively
expensive
argued
form
publication
notice
suffice
appeals
declined
settle
issue
nothing
record
us
arrive
rational
satisfactory
conclusion
propriety
resorting
form
publication
means
giving
necessary
notice
members
class
behalf
action
stated
commenced
maintained
outcome
eisen
ii
remand
evidentiary
hearing
questions
notice
manageability
adequacy
representation
matters
district
may
consider
pertinent
proper
ruling
aroused
later
controversy
appeals
expressly
purported
retain
appellate
jurisdiction
case
heard
remand
eisen
iii
finally
district
took
problem
notice
found
prospective
class
included
six
million
individuals
institutions
intermediaries
various
sorts
reasonable
effort
two
million
investors
identified
name
address
names
addresses
additional
persons
participated
special
investment
programs
involving
trading
also
identified
reasonable
effort
using
current
postage
rate
six
cents
determined
stuffing
mailing
individual
notice
form
cost
cents
thus
individual
notice
identifiable
class
members
cost
additional
expense
incurred
suitable
publication
notice
designed
reach
four
million
class
members
district
concluded
however
neither
rule
due
process
clause
required
substantial
expenditure
outset
litigation
instead
proposed
notification
scheme
consisting
four
elements
individual
notice
member
firms
exchange
commercial
banks
large
trust
departments
individual
notice
approximately
identifiable
class
members
transactions
relevant
period
individual
notice
additional
class
members
selected
random
prominent
publication
notice
wall
street
journal
newspapers
new
york
california
calculated
package
cost
approximately
issue
resolved
district
first
opinion
remand
eisen
ii
bear
cost
notice
petitioner
understandably
declined
pay
order
litigate
action
involving
individual
stake
question
presented
something
dilemma
expense
notice
placed
upon
petitioner
end
possibly
meritorious
suit
frustrating
policy
behind
private
antitrust
actions
admonition
new
rule
given
liberal
rather
restrictive
interpretation
eisen
ii
hand
costs
arbitrarily
placed
upon
respondents
point
result
might
imposition
unfair
burden
founded
upon
groundless
claim
addition
probability
encouraging
frivolous
class
actions
step
might
also
result
respondents
passing
customers
including
many
class
members
case
expenses
defending
actions
relying
purported
retention
jurisdiction
appeals
eisen
ii
respondents
may
obtained
order
directing
clerk
district
certify
transmit
record
appellate
review
subsequently
respondents
also
filed
notice
appeal
petitioner
motion
dismiss
ground
appeal
taken
final
order
denied
appeals
june
may
appeals
issued
eisen
iii
majority
disapproved
district
partial
reliance
publication
notice
holding
rule
required
individual
notice
identifiable
class
members
majority
ruled
district
authority
conduct
preliminary
hearing
merits
purpose
allocating
costs
entire
expense
notice
necessarily
fell
petitioner
representative
plaintiff
finally
appeals
rejected
expedient
recovery
concluded
proposed
class
action
unmanageable
rule
reasons
appeals
ordered
suit
dismissed
class
action
one
judge
concurred
result
solely
ground
district
erred
imposing
notice
costs
respondents
petitioner
requests
rehearing
rehearing
en
banc
denied
thus
six
years
three
published
decisions
appeals
endorsed
conclusion
reached
district
original
order
petitioner
suit
proceed
class
action
procedural
history
least
litigation
lived
judge
lumbard
characterization
frankenstein
monster
posing
class
action
eisen
ii
ii
outset
must
decide
whether
appeals
eisen
iii
jurisdiction
review
district
orders
permitting
suit
proceed
class
action
allocating
cost
notice
petitioner
contends
respondents
counter
asserting
two
independent
bases
appellate
jurisdiction
first
orders
question
constituted
final
decision
within
meaning
therefore
appealable
right
section
second
appeals
eisen
ii
expressly
retained
jurisdiction
pending
development
factual
record
remand
consequently
new
jurisdictional
basis
required
decision
eisen
iii
agree
first
ground
asserted
respondents
occasion
consider
second
restricting
appellate
review
final
decisions
prevents
debilitating
effect
judicial
administration
caused
piecemeal
appellate
disposition
practical
consequence
single
controversy
application
cases
plain
enough
determining
finality
particular
judicial
order
may
pose
close
question
verbal
formula
yet
devised
explain
prior
finality
decisions
unerring
accuracy
provide
utterly
reliable
guide
future
know
course
limit
appellate
review
final
judgments
terminate
action
cohen
beneficial
loan
rather
requirement
finality
given
practical
rather
technical
construction
inquiry
requires
evaluation
competing
considerations
underlying
questions
finality
inconvenience
costs
piecemeal
review
one
hand
danger
denying
justice
delay
dickinson
petroleum
conversion
omitted
find
instant
case
controlled
decision
cohen
beneficial
loan
supra
considered
applicability
federal
diversity
action
forum
state
statute
making
plaintiff
stockholder
derivative
action
liable
litigation
expenses
ultimately
unsuccessful
entitling
corporation
demand
security
advance
payment
trial
ruled
statute
inapplicable
corporation
sought
immediate
appellate
review
stockholder
objection
order
appealed
final
held
order
appealable
two
grounds
first
district
finding
tentative
informal
incomplete
settled
conclusively
corporation
claim
entitled
state
law
require
shareholder
post
security
costs
second
decision
constitute
merely
step
toward
final
disposition
merits
case
ibid
rather
concerned
collateral
matter
reviewed
effectively
appeal
final
judgment
summarized
conclusion
way
decision
appears
fall
small
class
finally
determine
claims
right
separable
collateral
rights
asserted
action
important
denied
review
independent
cause
require
appellate
consideration
deferred
whole
case
adjudicated
ibid
iii
turning
merits
case
find
district
resolution
notice
problems
erroneous
two
respects
first
failed
comply
notice
requirements
rule
second
imposed
part
cost
notice
respondents
rule
provides
class
action
maintained
subdivision
class
member
shall
advised
right
exclude
action
request
enter
appearance
counsel
judgment
whether
favorable
bind
class
members
requesting
exclusion
end
required
direct
class
members
best
notice
practicable
circumstances
including
individual
notice
members
identified
reasonable
effort
think
import
language
unmistakable
individual
notice
must
sent
class
members
whose
names
addresses
may
ascertained
reasonable
effort
advisory
committee
note
rule
reinforces
conclusion
see
advisory
committee
described
subdivision
merely
discretionary
added
mandatory
notice
pursuant
subdivision
designed
fulfill
requirements
due
process
class
action
procedure
course
subject
committee
explicated
incorporation
due
process
standards
citation
mullane
central
hanover
bank
trust
like
cases
mullane
addressed
constitutional
sufficiency
publication
notice
rather
mailed
individual
notice
known
beneficiaries
common
trust
fund
part
judicial
settlement
accounts
observed
notice
opportunity
heard
fundamental
requisites
constitutional
guarantee
procedural
due
process
stated
notice
must
reasonably
calculated
circumstances
apprise
interested
parties
pendency
action
afford
opportunity
present
objections
continued
notice
person
due
process
mere
gesture
due
process
means
employed
must
one
desirous
actually
informing
absentee
might
reasonably
adopt
accomplish
reasonableness
hence
constitutional
validity
chosen
method
may
defended
ground
reasonably
certain
inform
affected
schroeder
city
new
york
decided
prior
promulgation
amended
rule
explained
mullane
required
rejection
notice
publication
name
address
affected
person
available
stated
general
rule
notice
publication
enough
respect
person
whose
name
address
known
easily
ascertainable
also
noted
notice
publication
long
recognized
poor
substitute
actual
notice
justification
difficult
best
viewed
context
express
language
intent
rule
leave
doubt
individual
notice
must
provided
class
members
identifiable
reasonable
effort
present
case
names
addresses
class
members
easily
ascertainable
nothing
show
individual
notice
mailed
class
members
individual
notice
clearly
best
notice
practicable
within
meaning
rule
prior
decisions
petitioner
contends
however
dispense
requirement
individual
notice
case
advances
two
reasons
first
prohibitively
high
cost
providing
individual
notice
class
members
end
suit
class
action
effectively
frustrate
petitioner
attempt
vindicate
policies
underlying
antitrust
securities
laws
second
petitioner
contends
individual
notice
unnecessary
case
prospective
class
member
large
enough
stake
matter
justify
separate
litigation
individual
claim
hence
class
members
lack
incentive
opt
class
action
even
notified
short
answer
arguments
individual
notice
identifiable
class
members
discretionary
consideration
waived
particular
case
rather
unambiguous
requirement
rule
advisory
committee
note
explained
rule
intended
insure
judgment
whether
favorable
bind
class
members
request
exclusion
suit
pp
accordingly
class
member
identified
reasonable
effort
must
notified
may
request
exclusion
action
thereby
preserve
opportunity
press
claim
separately
may
remain
class
perhaps
participate
management
action
nothing
rule
suggest
notice
requirements
tailored
fit
pocketbooks
particular
plaintiffs
petitioner
contends
adequate
representation
rather
notice
touchstone
due
process
class
action
therefore
satisfies
rule
think
view
little
commend
begin
rule
speaks
notice
well
adequacy
representation
requires
provided
moreover
petitioner
argument
proves
much
quickly
leads
conclusion
notice
published
otherwise
required
present
case
quite
apart
due
process
may
require
command
rule
clearly
contrary
therefore
conclude
rule
requires
individual
notice
sent
class
members
identified
reasonable
effort
also
agree
appeals
petitioner
must
bear
cost
notice
members
class
district
reached
contrary
conclusion
imposed
notice
cost
respondents
decision
predicated
finding
made
preliminary
hearing
merits
case
petitioner
likely
prevail
claims
apparently
interpreted
rule
authorize
hearing
part
determination
whether
suit
may
maintained
class
action
disagree
find
nothing
either
language
history
rule
gives
authority
conduct
preliminary
inquiry
merits
suit
order
determine
whether
may
maintained
class
action
indeed
procedure
contravenes
rule
allowing
representative
plaintiff
secure
benefits
class
action
without
first
satisfying
requirements
thereby
allowed
obtain
determination
merits
claims
advanced
behalf
class
without
assurance
class
action
may
maintained
procedure
directly
contrary
command
subdivision
determine
whether
suit
denominated
class
action
may
maintained
soon
practicable
commencement
action
short
agree
judge
wisdom
conclusion
miller
mackey
international
rejected
preliminary
inquiry
merits
proposed
class
action
determining
propriety
class
action
question
whether
plaintiff
plaintiffs
stated
cause
action
prevail
merits
rather
whether
requirements
rule
met
absence
support
rule
petitioner
effort
impose
cost
notice
respondents
must
fail
usual
rule
plaintiff
must
initially
bear
cost
notice
class
exceptions
cited
district
related
situations
fiduciary
duty
plaintiff
defendant
shareholder
derivative
suit
relationship
parties
truly
adversary
plaintiff
must
pay
cost
notice
part
ordinary
burden
financing
suit
petitioner
consistently
maintained
however
bear
cost
notice
subdivision
members
class
defined
original
complaint
see
therefore
remand
cause
instructions
dismiss
class
action
defined
judgment
appeals
vacated
cause
remanded
proceedings
consistent
opinion
ordered
footnotes
july
breakpoint
raised
class
actions
maintainable
action
may
maintained
class
action
prerequisites
subdivision
satisfied
addition
prosecution
separate
actions
individual
members
class
create
risk
inconsistent
varying
adjudications
respect
individual
members
class
establish
incompatible
standards
conduct
party
opposing
class
adjudications
respect
individual
members
class
practical
matter
dispositive
interests
members
parties
adjudications
substantially
impair
impede
ability
protect
interests
party
opposing
class
acted
refused
act
grounds
generally
applicable
class
thereby
making
appropriate
final
injunctive
relief
corresponding
declaratory
relief
respect
class
whole
finds
questions
law
fact
common
members
class
predominate
questions
affecting
individual
members
class
action
superior
available
methods
fair
efficient
adjudication
controversy
matters
pertinent
findings
include
interest
members
class
individually
controlling
prosecution
defense
separate
actions
extent
nature
litigation
concerning
controversy
already
commenced
members
class
desirability
undesirability
concentrating
litigation
claims
particular
forum
difficulties
likely
encountered
management
class
action
appeals
petitioner
dropped
contention
suit
qualified
subdivision
held
subdivision
inapplicable
ground
prospective
class
consisted
entirely
small
claimants
none
afford
litigate
action
order
recover
individual
claim
consequently
little
chance
inconsistent
varying
adjudications
respect
individual
members
class
establish
incompatible
standards
conduct
party
opposing
class
subdivision
held
apply
actions
exclusively
predominantly
injunctive
declaratory
relief
advisory
committee
note
proposed
rules
civil
procedure
two
million
traders
dealt
brokerage
firms
transmitted
transactions
respondents
carlisle
jacquelin
decoppet
doremus
via
teletype
comparing
firms
computerized
records
teletype
transactions
brokerage
firms
computerized
records
customer
names
addresses
names
addresses
two
million
traders
obtained
period
may
june
individuals
transactions
participation
monthly
investment
plan
operated
exchange
persons
traded
odd
lots
participation
number
payroll
deduction
plans
operated
merrill
lynch
pierce
fenner
smith
adjusting
figure
reflect
subsequent
increase
postage
yield
figure
section
provides
courts
appeals
shall
jurisdiction
appeals
final
decisions
district
courts
district
district
canal
zone
district
guam
district
virgin
islands
except
direct
review
may
long
ago
complained
probably
question
equity
practice
subject
frequent
discussion
finality
decrees
cases
must
conceded
altogether
harmonious
mcgourkey
toledo
ohio
intervening
years
difficulty
resolving
questions
abated
justice
black
commented
gillespie
steel
whether
ruling
final
within
meaning
frequently
close
question
decision
issue
either
way
supported
equally
forceful
arguments
impossible
devise
formula
resolve
marginal
cases
coming
within
might
well
called
twilight
zone
finality
explained
part
iii
opinion
find
notice
requirements
rule
dispositive
petitioner
attempt
maintain
class
action
presently
defined
therefore
occasion
consider
whether
appeals
correctly
resolved
issues
manageability
recovery
indeed
whether
issues
properly
appeals
theory
retained
jurisdiction
emphasis
added
subdivision
provides
full
class
action
maintained
subdivision
shall
direct
members
class
best
notice
practicable
circumstances
including
individual
notice
members
identified
reasonable
effort
notice
shall
advise
member
exclude
class
requests
specified
date
judgment
whether
favorable
include
members
request
exclusion
member
request
exclusion
may
desires
enter
appearance
counsel
discussion
inadequacies
published
notice
bears
attention
idle
pretend
publication
alone
prescribed
reliable
means
acquainting
interested
parties
fact
rights
courts
chance
alone
brings
attention
even
local
resident
advertisement
small
type
inserted
back
pages
newspaper
makes
home
outside
area
newspaper
normal
circulation
odds
information
never
reach
large
indeed
chance
actual
notice
reduced
notice
required
even
name
whose
attention
supposed
attract
inform
acquaintances
might
call
attention
petitioner
also
argues
class
members
opt
statute
limitations
long
since
run
claims
class
members
petitioner
contention
disposed
recent
decision
american
pipe
construction
utah
established
commencement
class
action
tolls
applicable
statute
limitations
members
class
concerned
notice
requirements
subdivision
applicable
class
actions
maintained
subdivision
terms
subdivision
inapplicable
class
actions
injunctive
declaratory
relief
maintained
subdivision
petitioner
effort
qualify
suit
class
action
subdivisions
rejected
appeals
see
supra
see
dolgow
anderson
edny
course
express
opinion
proper
allocation
cost
notice
cases
record
reveal
whether
smaller
class
traders
defined
whether
petitioner
willing
pay
cost
notice
members
class
intimate
view
whether
subclass
satisfy
requirements
rule
note
however
dismissal
class
action
originally
defined
without
prejudice
efforts
petitioner
may
make
redefine
class
either
rule
fed
rule
civ
proc
justice
douglas
justice
brennan
justice
marshall
concur
dissenting
part
general
agreement
phases
case
touched
add
words
opinion
fully
explore
issues
dispositive
case
remand
district
federal
rule
civ
proc
provides
appropriate
action
may
brought
maintained
class
action
respect
particular
issues
class
may
divided
subclasses
subclass
treated
class
provisions
rule
shall
construed
applied
accordingly
judge
oakes
speaking
judge
timbers
said
plaintiff
class
might
example
divided
much
smaller
subclasses
odd
lot
buyers
particular
periods
one
subclass
treated
test
case
subclasses
held
abeyance
individual
notice
probably
reasonable
cost
given
members
particular
small
subclass
easily
identified
dissenting
denial
rehearing
en
banc
power
create
subclass
clear
unambiguous
included
large
questions
district
resolve
notice
member
subclass
essential
rule
rule
notified
member
may
opt
remain
question
whether
subclass
suit
manageable
since
subclass
chosen
light
size
class
whose
claims
presently
us
apparent
difficulty
sense
statute
limitations
argued
run
run
many
classes
held
american
pipe
construction
utah
start
class
action
prior
running
statute
protects
members
class
whether
rule
obtain
benefit
members
included
subclass
bringing
suit
manageability
issue
question
decided
moreover
subclass
sues
wins
sues
loses
questions
covering
rights
members
larger
class
parties
raised
questions
answered
fact
unresolved
questions
law
remain
insurmountable
obstacle
rule
expressly
authorizes
subclasses
sue
lieu
full
class
rule
may
forerunner
proposal
stated
judge
weinstein
question
law
fact
common
persons
numerous
class
whose
joinder
impracticable
one
whose
claims
defenses
representative
claims
defenses
fairly
adequately
protect
interests
may
sue
sued
behalf
rule
provide
six
requirements
class
action
class
numerous
members
common
question
law
fact
impracticability
joinder
representative
claim
defense
fair
adequate
protection
absentees
almost
bond
association
event
status
legal
dispute
arose
sufficient
constitute
class
class
must
numerous
need
large
factor
makes
impracticable
bring
number
members
sufficient
satisfy
present
section
new
york
civil
practice
act
satisfy
proposed
rule
size
modesty
monetary
interest
inability
locate
members
difficulty
obtaining
jurisdiction
considered
determining
impracticability
joinder
rule
provides
soon
practicable
commencement
action
brought
class
action
shall
determine
order
whether
maintained
order
subdivision
may
conditional
may
altered
amended
decision
merits
plain
words
make
decides
full
class
action
maintained
alter
amend
order
decision
merits
one
permissible
way
order
may
changed
altered
provided
rule
reducing
larger
class
subclass
provided
subsection
rule
prerequisites
class
cause
action
described
rule
instant
case
hurdle
passed
stage
notice
requirements
manageability
iota
change
made
cause
action
restricting
subclass
purpose
rule
provide
flexibility
management
class
actions
trial
taking
active
role
conduct
litigation
see
dolgow
anderson
edny
green
wolf
cert
denied
lower
federal
courts
recognized
discretion
define
subclasses
proper
prosecute
action
without
bound
plaintiff
complaint
see
dolgow
anderson
supra
philadelphia
elec
anaconda
american
brass
ed
see
generally
wright
miller
federal
practice
procedure
moore
federal
practice
rule
clearly
indicates
courts
retain
power
duty
realign
classes
conduct
action
appropriate
see
carr
conoco
plastics
cert
denied
johnson
industries
supp
nd
miss
ostapowicz
johnson
bronze
wd
baxter
savannah
sugar
refining
sd
discretion
fully
retained
complaint
preserved
subclass
defined
prosecute
action
bounds
subclass
narrowed
widened
order
district
provided
rule
without
need
amend
complaint
without
constraints
might
exist
complaint
earlier
amended
pursuant
rule
include
subclass
agree
professor
chafee
class
action
serves
convenience
parties
also
prompt
efficient
judicial
administration
think
society
growing
complexity
bound
innumerable
people
common
disasters
calamities
ventures
go
begging
justice
without
class
action
regard
due
process
protected
consumers
whose
claims
may
seem
de
minimis
alone
practical
recourse
either
remuneration
injunctive
relief
may
environmentalists
photographic
development
plant
ruined
air
pollution
radiation
suffer
perceptibly
smoke
noxious
gases
radiation
unnamed
individual
may
ratepayer
excessively
charged
utility
homeowner
whose
assessment
slowly
rising
beyond
ability
pay
class
action
one
legal
remedies
small
claimant
command
status
quo
strengthen
hand
view
creating
system
law
dispenses
justice
lowly
well
liberally
endowed
power
wealth
parties
courts
concentrated
whether
class
action
sustained
behalf
six
million
investors
record
limited
information
bearing
manageable
subclasses
created
nonetheless
indication
certain
subclasses
might
economically
manageable
counsel
respondent
carlisle
jacquelin
stated
oral
argument
appeals
shareholders
participate
client
monthly
investment
plan
carlisle
jacquelin
corresponds
investors
merrill
lynch
corresponds
people
participating
payroll
deduction
investment
plan
whether
eisen
plaintiff
may
come
forward
intervene
fits
subclass
know
brokerage
houses
correspond
regularly
course
business
investors
marginal
cost
providing
individual
notice
required
rule
might
nothing
printing
stuffing
additional
sheet
paper
correspondence
already
sent
investor
perhaps
programing
computer
type
additional
paragraph
bottom
monthly
quarterly
statements
regularly
mailed
brokers
subclass
engaged
numerous
transactions
might
also
defined
recovery
per
class
member
might
large
enough
justify
cost
notice
management
action
survey
four
wire
firms
revealed
customers
transactions
defining
definite
subclasses
discussed
moreover
problems
inherent
distributing
eventual
judgment
reduced
class
members
readily
identifiable
readily
accessible
transaction
records
individually
provable
damages
case
entire
class
defined
original
complaint
defendants
put
notice
within
period
limitation
potential
liability
serving
purpose
statute
limitations
even
substantive
merits
eventually
prosecuted
form
subclass
action
class
action
held
abeyance
within
period
set
statute
limitations
defendants
essential
information
necessary
determine
subject
matter
size
prospective
litigation
whether
actual
trial
conducted
form
class
action
joint
suit
principal
suit
additional
intervenors
american
pipe
construction
utah
see
wheaton
representative
suits
involving
numerous
litigants
cornell
subclass
lost
argued
investors
members
subclass
precluded
prosecuting
successful
suits
since
never
day
necessarily
even
apprised
subclass
action
see
hansberry
lee
james
civil
procedure
moore
federal
practice
subclass
strict
application
doctrine
mutuality
estoppel
limit
usefulness
subclass
victory
suits
brought
investors
members
subclass
see
generally
james
supra
moore
supra
supp
cases
cited
therein
see
vestal
judicata
variables
parties
iowa
rev
note
geo
rev
currie
mutuality
collateral
estoppel
limits
bernhard
doctrine
stan
rev
weinstein
revision
procedure
problems
class
actions
buffalo
rev
footnotes
omitted
eisen
remitted
individual
action
refused
pay
cost
notice
even
subclass
amendment
complaint
might
called
district
rule
district
may
instances
require
pleadings
amended
eliminate
class
allegations
advisory
committee
notes
indicate
provision
applied
suit
must
proceed
nonclass
individual
action
appropriate
class
exists
action
must
prosecuted
first
instance
subclass
problems
manageability
see
chafee
problems
equity
judge
weinstein
writing
law
journal
may
said
however
public
authorities
remiss
performance
responsibility
reason
inadequate
legal
authority
excessive
workloads
simple
indifference
class
actions
may
provide
necessary
temporary
measure
desirable
corrections
occurred
existence
class
action
litigation
may
also
play
substantial
role
bringing
efficient
administrative
enforcement
inducing
legislative
action
matter
touches
issue
credibility
judicial
system
either
committed
make
reasonable
efforts
provide
forum
adjudication
disputes
involving
citizens
including
deprived
human
rights
consumers
overpay
products
antitrust
violations
investors
victimized
insider
trading
misleading
information
ignore
irony
courts
ready
imprison
man
steals
goods
interstate
commerce
unwilling
grant
civil
remedy
corporation
benefited
extent
many
millions
dollars
collusive
illegal
pricing
goods
public
organization
modern
society
affords
possibility
illegal
behavior
accompanied
widespread
diffuse
consequences
procedural
means
must
exist
remedy
least
deter
conduct