wilson
argued
december
decided
february
jury
entered
guilty
verdict
respondent
federal
offense
one
respondent
postverdict
motions
district
dismissed
indictment
ground
delay
offense
indictment
prejudiced
respondent
right
fair
trial
appeals
dismissed
government
appeal
ground
double
jeopardy
clause
barred
review
district
ruling
ruling
based
facts
brought
trial
appeals
held
effect
acquittal
held
trial
judge
rules
favor
defendant
guilty
verdict
entered
trier
fact
government
may
appeal
ruling
without
contravening
double
jeopardy
clause
pp
clause
protects
government
appeals
danger
subjecting
defendant
second
trial
offense
hence
protection
attach
trial
judge
postverdict
correction
error
law
grant
prosecution
new
trial
subject
defendant
multiple
prosecutions
pp
district
ruling
respondent
favor
disposed
appeal
without
subjecting
second
trial
government
behest
prevails
appeal
matter
become
final
government
permitted
bring
second
prosecution
offense
whereas
loses
case
must
return
district
disposition
remaining
motions
marshall
delivered
opinion
burger
stewart
white
blackmun
powell
rehnquist
joined
douglas
filed
dissenting
opinion
brennan
joined
post
deputy
solicitor
general
frey
argued
cause
brief
solicitor
general
bork
assistant
attorney
general
petersen
edward
korman
philip
lauer
argued
cause
filed
brief
respondent
justice
marshall
delivered
opinion
respondent
george
wilson
tried
eastern
district
pennsylvania
converting
union
funds
use
violation
reporting
disclosure
act
stat
jury
entered
guilty
verdict
postverdict
motion
district
dismissed
indictment
ruled
delay
offense
indictment
prejudiced
defendant
dismissal
called
decision
marion
government
sought
appeal
dismissal
appeals
third
circuit
held
double
jeopardy
clause
barred
review
district
ruling
granted
certiorari
consider
applicability
double
jeopardy
clause
appeals
postverdict
rulings
trial
reverse
april
fbi
began
investigation
respondent
wilson
business
manager
local
international
brotherhood
electrical
workers
investigation
focused
wilson
suspected
conversion
union
funds
pay
part
expenses
daughter
wedding
reception
payment
apparently
made
check
drawn
union
funds
endorsed
treasurer
president
local
union
respondent
contended
trial
authorized
two
union
officials
make
payment
behalf
know
bill
reception
paid
union
funds
june
fbi
completed
investigation
reported
organized
crime
strike
force
local
attorney
office
matter
rested
months
three
days
prior
running
statute
limitations
respondent
indicted
illegal
conversion
union
funds
wilson
made
pretrial
motion
dismiss
indictment
ground
government
delay
filing
action
denied
opportunity
fair
trial
chance
mount
effective
defense
impaired
wilson
argued
two
union
officers
signed
check
reception
unavailable
testify
one
died
suffering
terminal
illness
hearing
denied
pretrial
motion
case
proceeded
trial
jury
returned
verdict
guilty
defendant
filed
various
motions
including
motion
arrest
judgment
motion
judgment
acquittal
motion
new
trial
district
reversed
earlier
ruling
dismissed
indictment
ground
preindictment
delay
unreasonable
substantially
prejudiced
defendant
right
fair
trial
union
treasurer
died
prior
noted
loss
testimony
attributed
preindictment
delay
union
president
however
become
unavailable
period
delay
ruled
since
remaining
witness
explain
circumstances
payment
check
preindictment
delay
violated
respondent
fifth
amendment
right
fair
trial
disposition
marion
claim
made
unnecessary
rule
defendant
postverdict
motions
government
sought
appeal
district
ruling
pursuant
criminal
appeals
act
appeals
dismissed
appeal
judgment
order
citing
decision
sisson
government
petition
rehearing
wrote
opinion
reasoned
since
district
relied
facts
brought
trial
finding
prejudice
preindictment
delay
ruling
effect
acquittal
double
jeopardy
clause
appeals
held
government
constitutionally
appeal
acquittal
even
though
rendered
judge
jury
returned
verdict
guilty
ii
government
argues
appeals
read
double
jeopardy
clause
broadly
mischaracterized
district
ruling
terming
acquittal
government
view
constitutional
restriction
governmental
appeals
intended
solely
protect
exposing
defendant
multiple
trials
shield
every
determination
favorable
defendant
appellate
review
since
new
trial
necessary
trier
fact
returned
verdict
guilty
government
argues
permitted
appeal
adverse
postverdict
ruling
alternative
government
urges
even
double
jeopardy
clause
read
bar
appeal
judgment
acquittal
district
order
case
acquittal
therefore
appealable
respondent
argues
prior
cases
double
jeopardy
clause
prohibits
appeal
order
discharging
defendant
order
based
facts
outside
indictment
agree
government
constitutional
protection
government
appeals
attaches
danger
subjecting
defendant
second
trial
offense
occasion
determine
whether
ruling
wilson
favor
actually
acquittal
even
though
district
characterized
otherwise
early
held
government
take
appeal
criminal
case
without
express
statutory
authority
sanges
reaching
underlying
constitutional
issue
held
general
appeals
provisions
judiciary
act
stat
sufficiently
explicit
overcome
rule
state
sue
writ
error
criminal
case
unless
legislature
expressly
granted
right
fifteen
years
later
congress
passed
first
criminal
appeals
act
conferred
jurisdiction
consider
criminal
appeals
government
limited
circumstances
stat
act
permitted
government
take
appeal
decision
dismissing
indictment
arresting
judgment
decision
based
invalidity
construction
statute
upon
indictment
founded
decision
sustaining
special
plea
bar
defendant
put
jeopardy
act
construed
accordance
meaning
terms
employed
rules
governing
conditions
appeal
became
highly
technical
number
occasions
struggle
vagaries
act
one
last
unhappy
efforts
concluded
act
failure
unruly
child
improved
age
sisson
congress
finally
disposed
statute
replaced
new
criminal
appeals
act
intended
broaden
government
appeal
rights
language
new
act
dispositive
legislative
history
makes
clear
congress
intended
remove
statutory
barriers
government
appeals
allow
appeals
whenever
constitution
permit
bill
proposed
department
justice
permitted
appeal
decision
judgment
order
district
dismissing
indictment
information
terminating
prosecution
favor
defendant
one
counts
except
appeal
lie
judgment
acquittal
senate
report
bill
indicated
judiciary
committee
intended
extend
government
appeal
rights
constitutional
limits
report
wording
bill
however
suggested
committee
thought
double
jeopardy
clause
bar
appeal
acquittal
whether
verdict
acquittal
jury
judgment
acquittal
entered
judge
time
committee
appears
thought
constitution
permit
review
ruling
judge
terminated
prosecution
even
ruling
came
midst
trial
conference
committee
made
two
important
changes
bill
although
offered
explanation
conf
committee
omitted
language
purporting
permit
appeal
order
terminating
prosecution
favor
defendant
removed
phrase
barred
appeal
acquittal
place
provision
committee
substituted
language
ultimately
enacted
appeal
authorized
decision
judgment
order
district
dismissing
indictment
information
except
appeal
shall
lie
double
jeopardy
clause
constitution
prohibits
prosecution
changes
consistent
senate
committee
desire
authorize
appeals
whenever
constitutionally
permissible
suggest
congress
decided
rely
upon
courts
define
constitutional
boundaries
rather
create
statutory
scheme
might
respects
narrower
broader
fifth
amendment
allow
light
background
seems
inescapable
congress
determined
avoid
creating
nonconstitutional
bars
government
right
appeal
district
order
case
therefore
appealable
unless
appeal
barred
constitution
statutory
restrictions
government
appeals
long
made
unnecessary
consider
constitutional
limitations
appeal
rights
prosecution
except
unusual
circumstances
even
relevant
cases
discussion
question
brief
congress
removed
statutory
limitations
double
jeopardy
clause
held
apply
see
benton
maryland
necessary
take
closer
look
policies
underlying
clause
order
determine
precisely
boundaries
government
appeal
rights
criminal
cases
documented
elsewhere
idea
double
jeopardy
old
see
bartkus
illinois
black
dissenting
jenkins
early
development
principle
traced
variety
sources
ranging
legal
maxims
casual
references
contemporary
commentary
although
form
breadth
prohibition
varied
widely
underlying
premise
generally
defendant
twice
tried
punished
offense
sigler
double
jeopardy
writing
century
lord
coke
described
protection
afforded
principle
double
jeopardy
function
three
related
pleas
autrefois
acquit
autrefois
convict
pardon
exceptions
pleas
raised
bar
second
trial
defendant
prove
already
convicted
crime
coke
institutes
ed
blackstone
later
used
ancient
term
jeopardy
characterizing
principle
underlying
two
pleas
autrefois
acquit
autrefois
convict
principle
wrote
universal
maxim
common
law
england
man
brought
jeopardy
life
offence
blackstone
commentaries
history
adoption
double
jeopardy
clause
sheds
light
drafters
thought
blackstone
universal
maxim
mean
applied
country
time
first
congress
one
state
constitutional
provision
embodying
anything
resembling
prohibition
double
jeopardy
course
ratification
proceedings
however
two
suggested
double
jeopardy
clause
included
among
first
amendments
federal
constitution
apparently
attempting
accommodate
suggestions
james
madison
added
ban
double
jeopardy
proposed
version
bill
rights
presented
house
representatives
june
madison
provision
read
person
shall
subject
except
cases
impeachment
one
punishment
one
trial
offence
annals
cong
several
members
house
challenged
madison
wording
ground
might
misconstrued
prevent
defendant
seeking
new
trial
appeal
conviction
one
madison
supporters
assured
doubters
proposed
clause
merely
stated
current
law
protection
defendants
implicit
language
stood
madison
wording
survived
house
senate
proposal
rejected
favor
traditional
language
employing
familiar
concept
jeopardy
senate
choice
language
tracked
blackstone
statement
principles
autrefois
acquit
autrefois
convict
adopted
conference
committee
approved
houses
apparent
dissension
course
debates
bill
rights
suggestion
double
jeopardy
clause
imposed
general
ban
appeals
prosecution
restriction
appeal
rights
mentioned
proposed
versions
clause
maryland
suggestion
shall
appeal
matter
fact
apparently
intended
apply
equally
prosecution
defense
background
clause
suggest
implied
prohibition
state
appeals
although
late
century
king
permitted
sue
writ
error
criminal
case
certain
circumstances
principles
autrefois
acquit
autrefois
convict
imposed
apparent
restrictions
right
defendant
indicted
second
time
either
conviction
acquittal
seek
protection
pleas
development
double
jeopardy
clause
origins
thus
suggests
directed
threat
multiple
prosecutions
government
appeals
least
appeals
require
new
trial
cases
construing
double
jeopardy
clause
reinforce
view
constitutional
guarantee
north
carolina
pearce
observed
double
jeopardy
clause
provides
three
related
protections
protects
second
prosecution
offense
acquittal
protects
second
prosecution
offense
conviction
protects
multiple
punishments
offense
policy
avoiding
multiple
trials
regarded
important
exceptions
principle
grudgingly
allowed
initially
new
trial
thought
unavailable
appeal
whether
requested
prosecution
defendant
see
gibert
cas
ccd
mass
story
made
clear
defendant
seek
new
trial
conviction
even
though
government
enjoyed
similar
right
ball
following
policy
granted
government
right
retry
defendant
mistrial
manifest
necessity
act
ends
public
justice
otherwise
defeated
perez
wheat
contrast
threat
either
multiple
punishment
successive
prosecutions
double
jeopardy
clause
offended
various
situations
appellate
review
subject
defendant
second
trial
held
order
favoring
defendant
constitutionally
appealed
government
since
criminal
appeals
act
example
government
permitted
without
serious
constitutional
challenge
appeal
orders
arresting
judgment
verdict
entered
defendant
see
bramblett
green
pratt
app
since
reversal
appeal
merely
reinstate
jury
verdict
review
order
offend
policy
multiple
prosecution
similarly
well
settled
appellate
order
reversing
conviction
subject
review
even
appellate
ordered
indictment
dismissed
defendant
discharged
forman
reversal
appeals
operated
deprive
government
right
seek
review
disposition
appeals
tantamount
verdict
acquittal
hands
jury
subject
review
motion
rehearing
appeal
certiorari
ibid
see
also
shotwell
mfg
difficult
see
rule
different
simply
defendant
gotten
favorable
postverdict
ruling
law
district
judge
rather
appeals
district
judge
relied
degree
evidence
presented
trial
making
ruling
although
review
ruling
law
discharging
defendant
obviously
enhances
likelihood
conviction
subjects
continuing
expense
anxiety
defendant
legitimate
claim
benefit
error
law
error
corrected
without
subjecting
second
trial
second
trier
fact
noted
relatively
occasions
comment
directly
constitutional
restrictions
government
appeals
relevant
cases
nonetheless
consistent
double
jeopardy
cases
related
areas
focusing
prohibition
multiple
trials
controlling
constitutional
principle
first
addressed
question
ball
supra
trial
indictment
murder
jury
found
one
defendants
guilty
indictment
later
determined
defective
held
acquittal
even
defective
indictment
sufficient
bar
subsequent
prosecution
offense
verdict
acquittal
final
wrote
reviewed
error
otherwise
without
putting
twice
jeopardy
thereby
violating
constitution
eight
years
later
faced
double
jeopardy
challenge
government
appeal
kepner
prosecution
sought
essence
trial
de
novo
defendant
acquitted
bench
trial
relying
ball
case
held
try
man
verdict
acquittal
put
twice
jeopardy
although
verdict
followed
judgment
permitting
appeal
kepner
effect
exposed
defendant
second
trial
violation
constitutional
protection
multiple
trials
offense
respondent
contends
ball
kepner
stand
proposition
key
invoking
double
jeopardy
protection
whether
defendant
might
subjected
multiple
trials
whether
point
prior
verdict
judgment
acquittal
ball
however
explained
review
verdict
acquittal
barred
primarily
expose
defendant
risk
second
trial
finder
fact
ruled
favor
first
although
kepner
case
technically
involved
single
proceeding
regarded
practice
equivalent
two
separate
trials
evil
saw
procedure
plainly
multiple
prosecution
first
instance
jurisdiction
try
question
guilt
innocence
accused
found
kepner
guilty
try
upon
merits
even
appellate
put
second
time
jeopardy
offense
finally
respondent
places
great
weight
decision
sisson
claims
sisson
extends
constitutional
protection
government
appeals
case
ruling
appealed
based
upon
facts
outside
face
indictment
sisson
arose
former
criminal
appeals
act
came
direct
appeal
district
defendant
tried
refusing
submit
induction
jury
found
guilty
postverdict
motion
however
district
entered
termed
arrest
judgment
dismissing
indictment
ground
sisson
convicted
sincere
opposition
war
vietnam
outweighed
country
need
draft
government
sought
appeal
district
ruling
theory
within
arresting
judgment
provision
criminal
appeals
act
held
ruling
appealable
either
arresting
judgment
motion
bar
provisions
act
dismissed
case
want
appellate
jurisdiction
writing
plurality
four
justices
justice
harlan
gave
three
reasons
conclusion
district
ruling
appealable
arrest
judgment
first
wrote
district
ruling
within
definition
arrest
judgment
since
went
beyond
face
record
criminal
appeals
act
noted
drafted
background
statutory
phrase
limited
meaning
incorporate
rulings
relied
upon
evidence
introduced
trial
second
district
ruling
failed
satisfy
statutory
requirement
decision
arresting
judgment
insufficiency
indictment
issue
sincerity
sisson
beliefs
presented
indictment
accordingly
indictment
insufficient
appeals
statute
since
sufficient
charge
offense
allege
facts
established
availability
constitutional
privilege
part
opinion
justice
black
provided
majority
justice
harlan
explained
third
reason
concluding
district
order
arrest
judgment
order
bottomed
factual
conclusions
found
indictment
instead
made
basis
evidence
adduced
trial
acquittal
rendered
trial
jury
verdict
guilty
district
postverdict
ruling
wrote
indistinguishable
hypothetical
verdict
acquittal
entered
jury
instruction
incorporating
constitutional
defense
judge
recognized
ruling
jury
instructed
acquitted
pointed
plainly
appeal
criminal
appeals
act
legislative
history
act
made
clear
congress
contemplate
review
verdicts
acquittal
matter
erroneous
constitutional
theory
underlying
instructions
added
appeal
taken
consistently
double
jeopardy
clause
latter
point
made
following
passage
quite
apart
statute
course
well
settled
acquittal
reviewed
error
otherwise
without
putting
defendant
twice
jeopardy
thereby
violating
constitution
country
verdict
acquittal
although
followed
judgment
bar
subsequent
prosecution
offence
ball
constrained
disagree
natural
reading
passage
suggests
reference
double
jeopardy
clause
meant
apply
hypothetical
jury
verdict
order
entered
trial
sisson
appeal
hypothetical
jury
verdict
precluded
statute
constitution
appeal
district
actual
ruling
case
however
barred
solely
statute
direct
effect
constitution
case
pointed
following
quoted
passage
jurisdictional
dismissal
sisson
retried
accordingly
find
sisson
authority
proposition
government
constitutionally
appeal
postverdict
order
unappealable
acquittal
former
criminal
appeals
act
government
seriously
contended
case
ruling
law
judge
course
trial
reviewable
prosecution
motion
although
view
support
among
commentators
since
justice
holmes
adopted
dissent
kepner
supra
justice
holmes
accepted
common
ground
double
jeopardy
clause
forbids
trial
new
independent
case
man
already
tried
view
first
jeopardy
treated
continuing
sides
exhausted
appeals
claimed
errors
law
regardless
possibility
defendant
may
subjected
retrial
verdict
acquittal
system
permitting
review
claimed
legal
errors
symmetry
recommend
avoid
release
defendants
benefited
instructions
evidentiary
rulings
unduly
favorable
rejected
position
past
continue
view
policies
underlying
double
jeopardy
clause
militate
permitting
government
appeal
verdict
acquittal
granting
government
broad
appeal
rights
allow
prosecutor
seek
persuade
second
trier
fact
defendant
guilt
failed
first
permit
weaknesses
first
presentation
order
strengthen
second
disserve
defendant
legitimate
interest
finality
verdict
acquittal
interests
however
apply
case
postverdict
ruling
law
trial
judge
correction
error
law
stage
grant
prosecutor
new
trial
subject
defendant
harassment
traditionally
associated
multiple
prosecutions
therefore
conclude
judge
rules
favor
defendant
verdict
guilty
entered
trier
fact
government
may
appeal
ruling
without
running
afoul
double
jeopardy
clause
iii
applying
principles
present
case
relatively
straightforward
task
jury
entered
verdict
guilty
wilson
ruling
favor
marion
motion
acted
appeals
indeed
without
subjecting
second
trial
government
behest
prevails
appeal
matter
become
final
government
permitted
bring
second
prosecution
offense
loses
case
must
go
back
district
disposition
remaining
motions
therefore
reverse
judgment
remand
appeals
consider
merits
government
appeal
reversed
remanded
footnotes
significantly
statute
expressly
provided
government
writ
error
case
verdict
favor
defendant
legislative
history
indicates
provision
added
ensure
statute
conflict
principles
double
jeopardy
clause
see
cong
rec
statute
amended
several
times
amendments
render
construction
simpler
significant
change
statute
amendment
stat
congress
provided
dismissals
reviewed
courts
appeals
appellate
jurisdiction
extend
prosecutions
information
statute
amended
authorize
government
appeals
pretrial
rulings
granting
motions
suppress
return
seized
property
stat
see
weller
sisson
mersky
borden
new
statute
passed
title
iii
omnibus
crime
control
act
pub
stat
expressions
principle
found
english
law
time
year
books
early
century
english
courts
begun
use
term
jeopardy
connection
principle
multiple
trials
see
kirk
jeopardy
period
year
books
rev
part
art
xvi
new
hampshire
constitution
read
subject
shall
liable
tried
acquittal
crime
offence
contained
prohibition
however
retrial
conviction
thorpe
federal
state
constitutions
among
suggested
amendments
new
york
sent
congress
ratification
declaration
one
read
person
put
twice
jeopardy
life
limb
one
offence
unless
case
impeachment
punished
offence
elliott
debates
federal
constitution
language
borrowed
heavily
blackstone
formulation
maryland
also
sent
proposed
version
double
jeopardy
clause
read
shall
appeal
matter
fact
second
trial
acquittal
provision
shall
extend
cases
may
arise
government
land
naval
forces
elliott
supra
brief
report
debate
appears
sides
agreed
defendant
second
trial
conviction
government
new
trial
acquittal
representative
sherman
commented
defendant
acquitted
first
trial
tried
second
time
convicted
first
thing
appear
set
judgment
aside
entitled
second
certainly
favorable
annals
cong
prosecution
appeal
rights
generally
limited
cases
error
appeared
face
record
defendant
obtained
acquittal
fraud
treachery
see
friedland
double
jeopardy
exception
one
trial
rule
explained
conclusory
theories
defendant
waives
double
jeopardy
claim
appealing
conviction
first
jeopardy
continues
acquitted
conviction
becomes
final
see
green
justice
harlan
noted
tateo
however
practical
justification
exception
simply
fairer
defendant
government
perez
emphasized
limited
scope
exception
adding
sure
power
declare
mistrial
subject
defendant
retrial
used
greatest
caution
urgent
circumstances
plain
obvious
causes
number
occasions
observed
double
jeopardy
clause
prohibits
merely
punishing
twice
attempting
second
time
punish
criminally
offense
helvering
mitchell
see
also
one
lot
emerald
cut
stones
stroud
cf
jorn
judge
learned
hand
took
position
zisblatt
appeal
dismissed
government
motion
long
verdict
guilty
remains
datum
correction
errors
law
attaching
proper
legal
consequences
trench
upon
constitutional
prohibition
challenge
kepner
based
constitution
statutory
provision
extended
double
jeopardy
protection
philippines
cases
construing
statute
necessarily
control
construction
double
jeopardy
clause
fifth
amendment
see
green
accept
kepner
correctly
stated
relevant
double
jeopardy
principles
although
kepner
technically
involved
one
proceeding
regarded
second
factfinding
equivalent
second
trial
subsequent
cases
treated
kepner
principle
addressed
evil
successive
trials
see
stroud
palko
connecticut
respondent
interpretation
passage
reliance
ball
difficult
explain
rationale
ball
case
particularly
portion
quoted
sisson
turns
fact
appeal
might
result
second
trial
necessary
sisson
narrower
reading
passage
reference
ball
precisely
point
verdict
hypothetical
jury
unappealable
reason
stated
quotation
ball
case
addition
respondent
proposed
reading
passage
constitutionalize
distinctions
sisson
anticipated
amended
criminal
appeals
act
eliminate
postverdict
order
except
arrest
judgment
constitutionally
appealable
courts
appeals
continue
plagued
limitations
imposed
awkward
ancient
criminal
appeals
act
worse
still
unhappy
task
exploring
pleading
distinctions
existed
common
law
imposed
see
benton
maryland
view
sisson
singularly
inappropriate
case
decide
constitutional
point
constitutional
question
raised
briefed
parties
resolution
issue
manner
respondent
suggests
marked
significant
development
double
jeopardy
law
deserving
plenary
treatment
government
advanced
argument
rather
cautiously
brief
companion
case
jenkins
post
upon
relied
case
see
brief
jenkins
pp
see
mayers
yarbrough
bis
vexari
new
trials
successive
prosecutions
harv
rev
miller
appeals
state
criminal
cases
yale
see
ashe
swenson
brennan
concurring
green
comment
double
jeopardy
government
appeals
criminal
dismissals
tex
rev
justice
douglas
justice
brennan
joins
dissenting
respondent
wilson
indicted
converting
use
funds
local
ibew
served
business
manager
financial
secretary
theory
prosecution
respondent
caused
union
funds
expended
daughter
wedding
reception
undisputed
check
drawn
union
signed
two
union
officers
brinker
schaefer
forwarded
hotel
wedding
reception
held
hotel
applied
payment
satisfaction
debts
incurred
account
reception
funds
paid
november
indictment
returned
october
three
days
prior
running
statute
limitations
time
neither
two
signatories
union
check
available
testify
case
brinker
died
schaefer
terminally
respondent
filed
pretrial
motion
dismiss
indictment
ground
preindictment
delay
violated
due
process
clause
fifth
amendment
see
marion
specifically
respondent
argued
unavailability
two
signatories
caused
preindictment
delay
prejudiced
defense
two
pretrial
hearings
district
denied
motion
trial
established
local
attorney
one
burke
made
deposit
hotel
wedding
reception
held
cover
expenses
bill
balance
mailed
hotel
respondent
home
address
five
months
later
check
signed
brinker
schaefer
arrived
testimony
established
usual
procedure
issuance
check
completion
voucher
signed
local
president
schaefer
recording
secretary
thus
signifying
approval
expenditure
preparation
check
secretary
signature
local
president
treasurer
established
respondent
first
given
brinker
schaefer
office
positions
though
elected
offices
held
union
respondent
testified
never
directed
anyone
issue
check
question
reimbursed
burke
personally
deposit
acknowledge
however
burke
told
november
shortly
payment
reached
hotel
bill
paid
close
evidence
respondent
renewed
motion
dismiss
account
preindictment
delay
judge
withheld
decision
receiving
verdict
jury
found
respondent
guilty
district
ruled
respondent
motion
found
government
unreasonably
delayed
indictment
months
completion
fbi
investigation
found
delay
caused
union
president
schaefer
unavailable
trial
witness
brinker
died
government
investigation
progress
since
view
presence
schaefer
signer
check
voucher
added
testimony
utmost
importance
trial
ruled
respondent
substantially
prejudiced
delay
deprived
trial
schaefer
testimony
accordingly
dismissed
indictment
government
sought
appeal
arguing
dismissal
erroneous
appeals
held
appeal
government
violated
double
jeopardy
clause
sisson
facts
developed
trial
sisson
led
jury
convict
jury
verdict
district
rendered
postverdict
opinion
called
arrest
judgment
called
directed
acquittal
described
legal
determination
basis
facts
adduced
trial
relating
general
issue
case
reading
reaffirmed
jorn
present
case
district
reviewed
evidence
given
trial
concluded
respondent
prejudiced
testimony
missing
witness
terminally
ill
probably
added
asked
appeal
appellate
judges
review
independently
evidence
trial
bearing
guilt
reach
different
conclusion
ball
said
dictum
continuing
impact
law
verdict
acquittal
final
reviewed
error
otherwise
without
putting
twice
jeopardy
thereby
violating
constitution
emphasis
supplied
kepner
defendant
acquitted
embezzling
charge
following
nonjury
trial
philippines
government
took
appeal
philippines
independently
reviewed
record
found
kepner
guilty
reversed
holding
double
jeopardy
clause
barred
entry
conviction
appellate
considered
appellate
review
philippine
equivalent
second
trial
ball
accordingly
held
settled
law
former
jeopardy
includes
one
acquitted
verdict
duly
rendered
protection
peril
second
punishment
tried
offense
present
case
fong
foo
ruling
trial
based
part
evidence
adduced
trial
part
related
issues
thus
issue
speedy
trial
present
case
reviewable
part
parcel
process
weighing
government
evidentiary
case
respondent
therefore
affirm
judgment
technically
construing
double
jeopardy
clause
statute
passed
congress
administration
philippines
contained
identical
language
treated
question
constitutional
one
finding
dictum
ball
controlling