perez
ledesma
argued
november
decided
february
appellees
arrested
charged
violating
louisiana
statute
parish
ordinance
displaying
sale
allegedly
obscene
material
seized
arresting
officers
brought
suit
federal
district
declaration
statute
ordinance
unconstitutional
injunction
enforcement
convened
upheld
statute
declined
issue
injunction
finding
arrests
seizure
invalid
entered
suppression
order
prohibiting
use
state
criminal
proceedings
illegally
seized
material
requiring
return
appellees
recognized
jurisdiction
pass
constitutionality
ordinance
expressed
view
ordinance
invalid
declared
ordinance
unconstitutional
appellants
appealed
directly
suppression
order
declaratory
judgment
invalidating
ordinance
held
erred
issuing
suppression
order
thereby
stifling
state
criminal
proceeding
defense
first
raise
constitutional
claims
younger
harris
ante
pp
jurisdiction
review
direct
appeal
validity
order
declaring
ordinance
invalid
since
decision
single
federal
judge
appealable
appeals
pp
black
delivered
opinion
burger
harlan
stewart
blackmun
joined
stewart
filed
concurring
opinion
blackmun
joined
post
douglas
filed
opinion
dissenting
part
post
brennan
filed
opinion
concurring
part
dissenting
part
white
marshall
joined
post
charles
livaudais
argued
cause
appellants
brief
robert
klees
jack
peebles
argued
cause
appellees
brief
stanley
fleishman
robert
eugene
smith
justice
black
delivered
opinion
given
decisions
today
younger
harris
ante
samuels
mackell
fernandez
mackell
ante
boyle
landry
ante
byrne
karalexis
post
dyson
stein
post
determined
appropriate
federal
intervene
administration
state
criminal
laws
disposition
case
difficult
ledesma
appellees
operated
newsstand
parish
bernard
louisiana
displayed
sale
allegedly
obscene
magazines
books
playing
cards
result
activity
appellees
charged
four
informations
filed
state
violations
louisiana
statute
la
rev
stat
ann
supp
bernard
parish
ordinance
state
proceedings
commenced
filing
informations
appellees
instituted
instant
suit
district
eastern
district
louisiana
new
orleans
division
since
appellees
sought
judgment
declaring
state
statute
statewide
application
unconstitutional
together
injunction
pending
future
prosecutions
statute
convened
held
louisiana
statute
constitutional
face
ruled
arrests
appellees
seizure
allegedly
obscene
materials
invalid
lack
prior
adversary
hearing
character
seized
materials
although
declined
issue
injunction
pending
future
prosecutions
enter
suppression
order
require
return
seized
material
appellees
supp
local
district
attorney
law
enforcement
officers
appealed
set
case
argument
postponed
question
jurisdiction
hearing
merits
difficult
imagine
disruptive
interference
operation
state
criminal
process
short
injunction
state
proceedings
even
recognized
judgment
effectively
stifle
state
criminal
prosecution
view
holding
arrests
seizures
cases
invalid
want
prior
adversary
judicial
determination
obscenity
holding
requires
suppression
return
seized
materials
prosecutions
effectively
terminated
emphasis
added
ii
crippling
louisiana
ability
enforce
criminal
statute
ledesma
expressed
view
parish
bernard
ordinance
invalid
although
recognized
function
federal
district
determine
constitutionality
enjoin
enforcement
local
ordinance
nevertheless
seized
opportunity
express
views
constitutionality
ordinance
supp
judge
boyle
district
judge
initially
referred
action
adopted
view
declared
parish
ordinance
invalid
considerable
question
concerning
propriety
issuing
declaratory
judgment
criminal
law
circumstances
case
iii
however
unable
review
decision
concerning
local
ordinance
jurisdiction
review
direct
appeal
validity
declaratory
judgment
local
ordinance
bernard
parish
ordinance
even
order
granting
declaratory
judgment
ordinance
entered
acting
capacity
held
moody
flowers
properly
convened
consider
constitutionality
statute
local
application
similar
local
ordinance
jurisdiction
consider
direct
appeal
civil
actions
required
heard
determined
since
constitutionality
parish
ordinance
required
heard
determined
panel
jurisdiction
review
question
fact
properly
convened
case
consider
injunctive
relief
requested
enforcement
state
statute
give
jurisdiction
direct
appeal
controversies
independent
jurisdictional
base
even
properly
convened
consider
one
controversy
two
parties
parties
necessarily
entitled
direct
appeal
controversies
may
exist
see
public
service
brashear
freight
lines
case
order
granting
declaratory
judgment
issued
rather
judge
boyle
acting
single
district
judge
stated
view
expressed
concerning
constitutionality
ordinance
shared
initiating
federal
district
judge
adopted
reference
opinion
issued
contemporaneously
herewith
emphasis
added
accordingly
reasons
assigned
ordered
judgment
cases
entered
decreeing
seized
materials
returned
instanter
seized
said
materials
suppressed
evidence
pending
future
prosecutions
plaintiffs
preliminary
permanent
injunctions
prayed
denied
jurisdiction
retained
herein
issuance
orders
may
necessary
proper
reasons
assigned
foregoing
opinion
ordered
judgment
entered
herein
decreeing
bernard
parish
ordinance
unconstitutional
jurisdiction
retained
herein
issuance
orders
may
necessary
proper
judgment
reversed
insofar
grants
injunctive
relief
respects
judgment
vacated
case
remanded
district
instructions
enter
fresh
decree
parties
may
take
appeal
appeals
fifth
circuit
desire
ordered
footnotes
time
instant
federal
suit
filed
pending
louisiana
state
criminal
prosecution
parish
ordinance
samuels
mackell
supra
held
interference
pending
state
criminal
prosecutions
declaratory
judgments
subject
restrictions
curbing
federal
interference
injunction
indicated
facts
present
record
show
appellees
suffer
irreparable
injury
kind
necessary
justify
federal
injunctive
interference
state
criminal
processes
aside
limited
local
application
ordinance
bars
direct
appeal
moody
flowers
question
whether
successful
party
properly
maintain
appeal
statute
permits
direct
appeal
order
granting
denying
injunction
state
successfully
opposed
injunction
enforcement
parish
ordinance
appeal
victory
see
gunn
university
committee
end
war
viet
nam
white
concurring
justice
stewart
justice
blackmun
joins
concurring
joining
opinion
judgment
add
concurring
words
district
decree
suppressing
use
seized
material
evidence
ordering
return
appellees
injunctive
order
appeal
properly
taken
directly
decree
plainly
wrong
stefanelli
minard
agree
must
reversed
stefanelli
affirmed
refusal
federal
district
suppress
use
pending
state
prosecution
evidence
petitioners
alleged
obtained
unlawful
search
ruling
clearly
applicable
facts
us
hold
federal
courts
refuse
intervene
state
criminal
proceedings
suppress
use
evidence
even
claimed
secured
unlawful
search
seizure
also
agree
appeal
declaratory
judgment
holding
parish
ordinance
unconstitutional
properly
us
power
consider
merits
appeal
two
quite
distinct
reasons
sufficient
defeat
jurisdiction
first
ordinance
neither
state
statute
statewide
application
case
thus
presents
fortiori
situation
found
jurisdiction
moody
flowers
second
appeal
grant
declaratory
relief
grant
denial
injunction
jurisdiction
therefore
lacking
gunn
university
committee
end
war
viet
nam
white
concurring
case
district
action
prayer
declaratory
relief
bound
action
request
injunction
might
direct
appeal
consider
propriety
declaratory
relief
pendency
grounds
cf
zwickler
koota
samuels
mackell
ante
indeed
district
recognized
request
declaratory
judgment
regarding
local
ordinance
unrelated
prayer
injunctive
relief
state
statute
single
district
judge
entered
separate
order
declaring
ordinance
unconstitutional
justice
douglas
dissenting
part
panel
properly
convened
consider
validity
louisiana
statute
general
application
also
asked
however
pass
ordinance
bernard
parish
agree
part
iii
opinion
written
justice
black
jurisdiction
phase
litigation
elementary
may
convened
consider
validity
local
ordinance
statute
local
application
moody
flowers
recognized
jurisdiction
pass
upon
constitutionality
ordinance
expressed
views
interest
judicial
economy
since
shared
initiating
federal
district
judge
adopted
reference
opinion
issued
contemporaneously
herewith
supp
stated
examined
ordinance
find
unconstitutional
unenforceable
single
district
judge
ordered
judgment
entered
holding
ordinance
unconstitutional
order
obviously
judgment
basis
appeal
later
clerk
also
entered
judgment
effect
judgment
entered
pursuant
order
single
district
judge
go
appeals
review
moreover
even
judgment
entered
clerk
authorized
properly
order
judgment
concerning
ordinance
pendent
jurisdiction
claim
pendent
jurisdiction
extend
nonconstitutional
grounds
challenging
statute
constitutional
challenge
also
raised
siler
louisville
davis
wallace
sterling
constantin
georgia
pub
serv
florida
lime
growers
jacobsen
flast
cohen
state
causes
action
appended
federal
causes
action
causes
action
arose
set
facts
mine
workers
gibbs
case
however
involve
challenge
one
statute
request
one
award
relief
different
grounds
challenge
two
different
laws
grounds
argument
considering
laws
together
ledesma
charged
sufficient
ruling
give
jurisdiction
direct
appeal
ruling
appellants
challenge
jurisdiction
appellate
jurisdiction
claim
subject
matter
jurisdiction
federal
courts
may
bestowed
parties
griffin
cases
cited
appellants
support
jurisdiction
claim
zemel
rusk
allowed
challenge
administrative
action
authorized
statute
joined
constitutional
attack
statutes
purportedly
authorized
action
milky
way
productions
leary
together
new
york
feed
leary
supp
per
curiam
affirmance
without
opinion
issues
presented
conceded
parties
constitutional
attacks
obscenity
statutes
arrest
warrant
statutes
new
york
jurisdiction
attack
arrest
warrant
statutes
independent
claim
issue
pendent
jurisdiction
involved
raised
therefore
problem
considered
per
curiam
affirmance
holding
pendent
jurisdiction
decide
perez
basis
milky
way
basis
applicable
precedent
reason
precedent
reason
advanced
enlargement
pendent
jurisdiction
rewriting
law
pendent
jurisdiction
done
congress
present
judgment
reviewed
appeals
rorick
ii
orders
suppressing
evidence
prosecution
louisiana
statute
sets
aside
dissent
views
congenial
majority
set
forth
length
younger
harris
ante
dyson
stein
post
decided
day
none
parties
raised
question
concerning
pendent
jurisdiction
new
york
feed
complained
arrest
without
prior
adversary
hearing
unconstitutional
milky
way
attacked
arrest
warrant
statutes
unconstitutional
applied
law
alleging
overbroad
illegal
prior
restraint
vague
attorney
general
new
york
cases
treated
claim
attack
constitutionality
arrest
warrant
statutes
argued
constitutional
district
attorney
argued
petitioners
attack
arrest
warrant
statutes
improper
preclude
adversary
hearing
however
raise
jurisdictional
questions
power
pass
legality
arrests
city
new
york
raised
jurisdictional
challenge
reply
petitioners
argued
arrest
warrant
statutes
unconstitutional
applied
law
justice
brennan
justice
white
justice
marshall
join
concurring
part
dissenting
part
case
presents
questions
regarding
federal
intervention
affecting
administration
state
criminal
laws
presented
younger
harris
ante
samuels
mackell
fernandez
mackell
ante
boyle
landry
ante
byrne
karalexis
post
dyson
stein
post
decided
today
appellees
operate
newsstand
parish
bernard
louisiana
january
sheriff
officers
parish
without
warrants
raided
newsstand
seized
allegedly
obscene
magazines
books
playing
cards
shelves
arrested
appellee
august
ledesma
owner
displaying
obscene
materials
sale
february
four
informations
filed
state
district
two
charging
ledesma
crime
obscenity
violation
louisiana
statute
la
rev
stat
ann
supp
two
charging
obscenity
violation
bernard
parish
ordinance
statute
ordinance
appear
appendix
opinion
february
appellees
filed
instant
action
district
eastern
district
louisiana
new
orleans
division
complaint
sought
judgment
federal
declaratory
judgment
act
declaring
state
statute
parish
ordinance
unconstitutional
injunction
pending
future
prosecutions
either
enactment
injunction
directing
return
seized
magazines
books
playing
cards
suppressing
use
evidence
pending
future
criminal
prosecution
appellees
convened
prior
federal
hearing
appellant
entered
nolle
prosequi
state
two
informations
charging
violation
parish
ordinance
filed
opinion
holding
louisiana
statute
constitutional
face
parish
ordinance
unconstitutional
face
arrest
appellee
ledesma
seizure
magazines
books
playing
cards
unconstitutional
absence
prior
judicial
adversary
hearing
determining
seized
materials
obscene
supp
stated
confident
appellants
comply
views
unnecessary
issue
injunctions
pending
future
prosecutions
future
arrests
seizures
pertinent
part
judgment
entered
august
therefore
decreed
seized
materials
returned
instanter
appellants
appellees
seized
said
materials
suppressed
evidence
pending
future
prosecutions
appellees
preliminary
permanent
injunctions
prayed
denied
bernard
parish
ordinance
unconstitutional
app
appropriate
exercise
discretion
grant
relief
paragraphs
judgment
august
view
pendency
state
prosecution
charging
violation
louisiana
revised
statutes
appropriate
exercise
discretion
paragraph
said
judgment
declare
bernard
parish
ordinance
unconstitutional
jurisdiction
ii
injunctions
iii
declaratory
judgment
parish
ordinance
threshold
questions
must
answered
merits
declaratory
judgment
paragraph
judgment
reached
first
threshold
question
whether
declaratory
judgment
properly
us
review
two
opinions
written
judge
boyle
initiated
panel
filed
july
one
separate
opinion
judge
boyle
judge
boyle
opinion
three
judges
explained
although
function
federal
district
determine
constitutionality
enjoin
enforcement
local
ordinance
distinguished
statutes
application
moody
flowers
takes
opportunity
express
views
constitutionality
ordinance
interest
judicial
economy
view
expressed
concerning
constitutionality
ordinance
shared
initiating
federal
district
judge
adopted
reference
opinion
issued
contemporaneously
herewith
emphasis
added
judge
boyle
separate
opinion
brief
statement
reasons
assigned
foregoing
opinion
ordered
judgment
entered
herein
decreeing
bernard
parish
ordinance
unconstitutional
jurisdiction
retained
herein
issuance
orders
may
necessary
proper
holds
jurisdiction
review
declaratory
judgment
premise
declaratory
judgment
local
ordinance
issued
rather
judge
boyle
acting
single
judge
respect
case
brothers
douglas
stewart
insist
judge
boyle
separate
statement
fact
judgment
suppose
judge
boyle
best
authority
expressly
referred
statement
opinion
appeals
course
taken
judgments
opinions
judgment
entered
judge
boyle
pursuant
separate
opinion
therefore
existed
judgment
pursuant
order
single
judge
go
appeals
review
judgment
entered
case
entered
august
since
injunctions
paragraphs
rendered
judgment
appealable
directly
paragraph
judgment
declaratory
judgment
necessarily
us
however
considerations
require
decide
whether
properly
rendered
declaratory
judgment
per
curiam
affirmance
milky
way
productions
leary
supp
sdny
aff
fully
supports
action
case
present
attacks
statute
ordinance
rather
attacks
two
different
new
york
statutes
first
attack
penal
law
new
york
general
obscenity
statute
second
attack
code
crim
proc
supp
district
held
required
deal
attack
since
claim
section
facially
unconstitutional
however
attack
code
criminal
procedure
sections
facially
unconstitutional
sections
unconstitutionally
invoked
adversary
judicial
determination
obscenity
publications
question
applied
district
acknowledged
attack
code
provisions
thus
probably
determination
three
judges
simple
claim
official
lawlessness
cognizable
one
judge
nevertheless
district
invoking
principle
jurisdiction
established
one
claim
may
consider
issues
alone
called
three
judges
held
since
jurisdiction
claim
facial
unconstitutionality
jurisdiction
existed
also
determine
merits
claim
criminal
procedure
provisions
unconstitutionally
applied
affirmance
sustained
holding
plainly
affirmance
governs
case
sustains
propriety
action
passing
constitutionality
ordinance
appellants
concede
milky
way
forecloses
challenge
part
action
indeed
regard
action
supported
cases
authorizing
courts
consider
attacks
statutes
nonconstitutional
grounds
courts
properly
convened
hear
constitutional
challenges
statutes
appellants
argue
however
controversy
requisite
relief
federal
declaratory
judgment
act
existed
nolle
prosequi
entered
argument
presents
second
threshold
question
appellants
rely
upon
golden
zwickler
case
new
york
criminal
statute
prohibited
distribution
anonymous
handbills
election
campaigns
distributor
anonymous
handbills
opposing
congressman
sought
federal
judgment
declaring
statute
unconstitutional
federal
action
brought
reversal
new
york
courts
appellee
conviction
distributing
handbills
earlier
campaign
congressman
see
zwickler
koota
appellee
desired
distribute
handbills
forthcoming
campaign
congressman
congressman
retired
congress
become
justice
new
york
circumstances
held
controversy
requisite
declaratory
relief
existed
since
zwickler
target
particular
congressman
prospect
neither
real
immediate
campaign
involving
congressman
situation
quite
different
however
basically
question
case
whether
facts
alleged
circumstances
show
substantial
controversy
parties
adverse
legal
interests
sufficient
immediacy
reality
warrant
issuance
declaratory
judgment
maryland
casualty
pacific
coal
oil
appellees
complaint
expressly
alleges
evidence
finding
contrary
appellees
desire
continue
keep
sale
sell
publications
playing
cards
question
thus
unlike
situation
golden
question
constitutionality
ordinance
presented
context
specific
live
grievance
conclusion
buttressed
finding
appellees
fear
prosecution
ordinance
future
date
indeed
light
appellants
aggressive
prosecution
appellees
inference
permissible
attempts
appellees
continue
display
questioned
publications
sale
might
well
met
prosecutions
statute
ordinance
question
continuing
controversy
appellants
state
involving
sale
allegedly
obscene
publications
appellants
assert
contrary
district
assert
contrary
conclude
said
erred
finding
existed
controversy
requisite
federal
declaratory
judgment
act
third
threshold
question
whether
state
prosecution
ordinance
pending
make
federal
intervention
inappropriate
fact
already
noted
informations
appellee
ledesma
violation
ordinance
outstanding
federal
suit
filed
however
nolle
prosequi
informations
entered
convened
heard
case
therefore
treated
case
one
prosecution
ordinance
pending
error
availability
declaratory
relief
correctly
regarded
depend
upon
situation
time
hearing
upon
situation
federal
suit
initiated
see
golden
zwickler
principles
comity
apply
federal
intervention
treated
today
nos
see
supra
present
issue
key
predicate
answering
question
whether
federal
stay
hand
whether
pending
state
prosecution
federal
plaintiff
may
constitutional
defenses
heard
determined
ordinarily
question
may
answered
merely
examining
dates
upon
federal
state
actions
filed
state
prosecution
first
filed
provides
adequate
forum
adjudication
constitutional
rights
federal
ordinarily
intervene
however
time
federal
hearing
state
prosecution
federal
plaintiff
may
relegated
assertion
constitutional
defenses
primary
reason
refusing
intervention
absent
forum
adjudication
appellees
constitutional
objections
ordinance
course
intrusion
state
administration
criminal
laws
whenever
federal
renders
declaratory
judgment
upon
constitutionality
state
criminal
enactment
holds
today
samuels
mackell
supra
considerations
federalism
ordinarily
make
intrusion
impermissible
state
prosecution
enactment
proceeding
time
federal
suit
filed
says
cases
state
criminal
prosecution
begun
prior
federal
suit
equitable
principles
relevant
propriety
injunction
must
taken
consideration
federal
district
courts
determining
whether
issue
declaratory
judgment
injunction
impermissible
principles
declaratory
relief
ordinarily
denied
well
considerations
federalism
controlling
state
prosecution
pending
question
whether
declaratory
relief
appropriate
case
congressional
scheme
makes
federal
courts
primary
guardians
constitutional
rights
express
congressional
authorization
declaratory
relief
afforded
less
harsh
abrasive
remedy
injunction
become
factors
primary
significance
controversy
power
federal
courts
declare
state
statutes
unconstitutional
enjoin
enforcement
roots
reach
back
least
chisholm
georgia
dall
contract
action
held
state
sued
citizen
another
state
decision
created
shock
surprise
throughout
country
first
meeting
congress
thereafter
eleventh
amendment
constitution
almost
unanimously
proposed
due
course
adopted
legislatures
hans
louisiana
bradley
amendment
thought
overruled
chisholm
although
amendment
might
construed
give
broad
immunity
federal
suits
state
officials
acting
pursuant
state
policy
construction
rejected
osborn
bank
wheat
osborn
involved
confiscatory
state
tax
federal
instrumentality
sustaining
federal
injunction
state
tax
chief
justice
marshall
analyzed
controversy
federal
judicial
power
testing
viability
federal
system
eleventh
amendment
exempted
state
suits
citizens
difficult
question
decided
whether
case
may
act
upon
agents
employed
state
property
hands
try
question
constitution
may
time
misapplied
pause
moment
reflect
relative
situation
union
members
objection
prevail
denial
jurisdiction
forbids
inquiry
nature
case
applies
cases
perfectly
clear
cases
government
exercise
best
established
essential
powers
well
may
deemed
questionable
asserts
agents
state
alleging
authority
law
void
repugnant
constitution
may
arrest
execution
law
ex
parte
young
culmination
efforts
harmonize
principles
eleventh
amendment
effective
supremacy
rights
powers
secured
elsewhere
constitution
years
osborn
young
particularly
civil
war
congress
undertook
make
federal
courts
primary
guardians
constitutional
rights
history
reviewed
zwickler
koota
principal
foundations
expanded
federal
jurisdiction
constitutional
cases
civil
rights
act
stat
empowered
federal
courts
adjudicate
constitutionality
actions
person
taken
color
state
statute
ordinance
regulation
custom
usage
see
judiciary
act
stat
gave
lower
federal
courts
general
jurisdiction
see
two
statutes
together
decision
ex
parte
young
established
modern
framework
federal
protection
constitutional
rights
state
interference
framework
strengthened
expanded
subsequent
acts
congress
subsequent
decisions
ex
parte
young
involved
state
regulatory
statute
penal
sanctions
suit
railroad
stockholders
federal
circuit
temporarily
enjoined
railroad
complying
statute
also
temporarily
enjoined
young
state
attorney
general
instituting
proceedings
enforce
statute
young
nevertheless
brought
enforcement
proceeding
state
thereupon
held
contempt
circuit
brought
habeas
corpus
contending
circuit
lacked
jurisdiction
hold
contempt
held
first
original
suit
properly
within
general
jurisdiction
circuit
second
individuals
officers
state
clothed
duty
regard
enforcement
laws
state
threaten
commence
proceedings
either
civil
criminal
nature
enforce
parties
affected
unconstitutional
act
violating
federal
constitution
may
enjoined
federal
equity
action
third
federal
equity
power
appropriate
circumstances
enjoin
future
state
criminal
prosecution
state
proceeding
brought
enforce
alleged
unconstitutional
statute
subject
matter
inquiry
suit
already
pending
federal
latter
first
obtained
jurisdiction
subject
matter
right
civil
criminal
cases
hold
maintain
jurisdiction
exclusion
courts
duty
fully
performed
decision
ex
parte
young
provoked
reaction
unlike
greeted
chisholm
georgia
opposition
focused
principally
power
lower
federal
courts
single
judges
courts
issue
preliminary
injunctions
often
ex
parte
enforcement
state
statutes
generally
regulatory
statutes
carrying
penalties
see
generally
kennedy
hart
wechsler
federal
courts
federal
system
hutcheson
case
three
judges
harv
rev
currie
district
constitutional
litigation
chi
rev
opinion
ex
parte
young
anticipated
problem
noted
objection
necessary
result
upholding
suit
circuit
draw
lower
federal
courts
great
flood
litigation
character
one
federal
judge
power
enjoin
proceedings
state
officials
enforce
legislative
acts
state
either
criminal
civil
actions
year
case
decided
congress
considered
measure
disable
lower
federal
courts
enjoining
enforcement
state
statutes
proposal
failed
attract
sufficient
support
passage
see
cong
rec
two
years
later
similar
measure
passed
house
see
cong
rec
senate
accept
see
frankfurter
landis
business
however
year
congress
respond
ex
parte
young
attempt
overrule
case
constitutional
amendment
statute
seek
contain
expanding
statutory
bar
federal
injunctions
state
proceedings
beyond
stays
suits
already
instituted
follow
precedent
eleventh
amendment
excluding
class
litigation
federal
jurisdiction
anticipate
technique
act
forbidding
use
injunction
defined
class
cases
see
stat
rather
congress
ratified
active
role
assigned
federal
courts
war
legislation
accepted
basic
holdings
ex
parte
young
provided
preliminary
injunction
enforcement
state
statute
issued
district
see
stat
decision
granting
denying
injunction
directly
appealable
see
thus
act
confirmed
congress
acceptance
ex
parte
young
course
federal
adjudication
constitutionality
state
statutes
represented
congress
never
departed
acceptance
several
occasions
amended
act
professor
wright
written
doctrine
ex
parte
young
seems
indispensable
establishment
constitutional
government
rule
law
wright
handbook
law
federal
courts
ed
period
leading
following
ex
parte
young
federal
injunction
suit
became
classic
method
testing
constitutionality
state
statutes
injunctive
remedy
strong
medicine
act
eliminate
defects
widespread
hostility
injunction
procedure
procedure
unsatisfactory
private
plaintiffs
state
defendants
plaintiff
burden
proving
traditional
equity
requirements
injunction
plaintiff
prevailed
injunction
issued
defendant
state
official
paralyzing
enforcement
state
statute
pending
review
consequently
without
expanding
reducing
subject
matter
jurisdiction
federal
courts
way
diminishing
continuing
vitality
ex
parte
young
respect
federal
injunctions
congress
empowered
federal
courts
grant
new
remedy
declaratory
judgment
see
act
june
stat
express
purpose
federal
declaratory
judgment
act
provide
milder
alternative
injunction
remedy
house
committee
report
stated
principle
involved
form
procedure
confer
upon
courts
power
exercise
instances
preventive
relief
function
performed
rather
clumsily
equitable
proceedings
inadequately
law
courts
particular
significance
question
us
senate
report
makes
even
clearer
declaratory
judgment
designed
available
test
state
criminal
statutes
circumstances
injunction
appropriate
declaratory
judgment
differs
essential
respect
judgment
except
followed
decree
damages
injunction
specific
performance
immediately
coercive
decree
declares
conclusively
finally
rights
parties
litigations
contested
issue
form
relief
often
suffices
settle
controversies
fully
administer
justice
employed
state
courts
declaration
rights
contested
statute
municipal
ordinance
possible
necessary
obtain
injunction
procedure
especially
useful
avoiding
necessity
often
present
act
one
peril
act
one
interpretation
rights
abandon
one
rights
fear
incurring
damages
often
necessary
absence
declaratory
judgment
procedure
violate
purport
violate
statute
order
obtain
judicial
determination
meaning
validity
compare
shredded
wheat
city
elgin
parties
denied
injunction
enforcement
municipal
ordinance
carrying
penalty
advised
purport
violate
statute
rights
determined
erwin
billiard
parlor
buckner
declaratory
judgment
circumstances
issued
settled
controversy
fact
declaratory
judgment
often
proved
necessary
employed
names
years
many
cases
injunction
procedure
abused
order
render
effect
declaratory
judgment
example
case
pierce
society
sisters
issued
injunction
enforcement
oregon
statute
come
force
years
later
rendering
judgment
declaring
statute
void
effect
issued
declaratory
judgment
effect
apparently
abuse
injunction
see
also
village
euclid
ambler
realty
much
hostility
extensive
use
injunction
power
federal
courts
obviated
enabling
courts
render
declaratory
judgments
finally
may
said
procedure
molded
settled
thousands
precedents
administration
law
definitely
clarified
mentioned
one
principal
purposes
terrace
thompson
butler
said
obliged
take
risk
prosecutions
fines
imprisonment
loss
property
order
secure
adjudication
rights
declaratory
judgment
serves
another
useful
purpose
often
happens
courts
unwilling
grant
injunctions
restrain
enforcement
penal
statutes
ordinances
relegate
plaintiff
option
either
violate
statute
take
chances
testing
constitutionality
criminal
prosecution
else
forego
fear
prosecution
exercise
claimed
rights
dilemma
civilized
legal
system
operating
constitution
force
person
effect
refusing
injunction
informs
prospective
victim
way
determine
whether
suspect
mushroom
toadstool
eat
assuming
plaintiff
vital
interest
enforcement
challenged
statute
ordinance
reason
declaratory
judgment
issued
instead
compelling
violation
statute
condition
precedent
challenging
constitutionality
hearings
supra
history
compels
rejection
suggestion
ante
although
informations
pending
time
hearing
declaratory
relief
inappropriate
absence
showing
appellees
suffer
irreparable
injury
kind
necessary
justify
federal
injunctive
interference
state
criminal
processes
congress
expressly
rejected
limitation
engraft
upon
availability
congressionally
provided
declaratory
remedy
simply
judicial
defiance
congressional
mandate
nothing
short
judicial
repeal
statute
statute
repealed
rewritten
must
done
congress
ex
parte
young
makes
clear
significant
factor
determining
propriety
federal
intervention
whether
state
proceeding
exists
initiated
federal
suit
filed
upheld
federal
injunction
future
state
proceedings
injunction
aid
federal
jurisdiction
expressly
excepted
holding
case
state
proceeding
exists
pending
time
federal
jurisdiction
attached
specifically
stated
federal
course
interfere
case
proceedings
already
pending
state
cited
harkrader
wadley
support
thus
making
clear
ruling
influenced
statutory
provision
first
enacted
prohibiting
federal
injunctions
proceedings
pending
state
history
provision
recently
traced
atlantic
coast
line
brotherhood
locomotive
engineers
however
statutory
bar
applies
prosecutions
begun
federal
suit
filed
preclude
injunctions
institution
future
prosecutions
see
generally
warren
federal
state
interference
harv
rev
thus
general
rules
follow
ex
parte
young
first
pending
state
proceeding
federal
suit
filed
federal
adjudicate
constitutional
claims
state
officials
issue
orders
necessary
preserve
jurisdiction
second
state
proceeding
exists
pending
time
suit
filed
federal
federal
ordinarily
decline
render
either
declaratory
injunctive
relief
rules
developed
light
additional
considerations
dombrowski
pfister
dombrowski
confirmed
principle
constitutional
defenses
state
criminal
charge
must
initially
tested
state
rather
federal
courts
see
douglas
city
jeannette
cameron
johnson
compare
stefanelli
minard
rea
however
dombrowski
also
recognized
exceptional
circumstances
may
justify
federal
intervention
opportunity
raise
constitutional
defenses
state
criminal
trial
assure
protection
constitutional
rights
stake
dombrowski
considered
two
situations
exceptional
circumstances
exist
first
order
discourage
conduct
protected
first
amendment
provision
constitution
state
brings
threatens
bring
criminal
prosecution
bad
faith
purpose
harassment
bringing
prosecution
threat
constitutional
deprivation
since
subjects
person
burden
criminal
defense
bear
exists
situation
defense
state
criminal
prosecution
assure
adequate
vindication
constitutional
rights
dombrowski
pfister
supra
see
cameron
johnson
supra
cf
achtenberg
mississippi
accordingly
context
civil
suit
appropriate
means
cut
short
unconstitutional
state
prosecution
civil
suit
remedial
relief
may
appropriately
brought
federal
since
federal
courts
primary
guardians
constitutional
rights
zwickler
koota
supra
second
criminal
statute
prohibits
seems
prohibit
constitutionally
protected
conduct
extent
unconstitutionally
vague
overbroad
contention
made
state
statute
case
opportunity
raise
constitutional
defenses
criminal
trial
inadequate
protect
underlying
constitutional
rights
since
situation
substantial
number
people
may
well
avoid
risk
criminal
prosecution
abstaining
conduct
thought
proscribed
statute
even
persons
confident
contemplated
conduct
held
constitutionally
protected
accordingly
state
conviction
overturned
may
deterred
engaging
conduct
prospect
becoming
enmeshed
protracted
criminal
litigation
risk
end
years
later
confidence
prove
misplaced
resources
wasted
deterrence
magnified
scope
vagueness
overbreadth
gives
discriminatory
capricious
enforcement
federal
anticipatory
relief
justified
principal
function
federal
courts
vindicate
constitutional
rights
persons
want
obey
state
laws
well
prepared
defy
thus
dombrowski
held
cases
categories
federal
courts
may
properly
intervene
order
assure
full
protection
federal
constitutional
rights
taken
together
principles
ex
parte
young
dombrowski
establish
whether
particular
case
appropriate
federal
intervention
depends
whether
state
proceeding
pending
ground
asserted
intervention
ground
harassment
intervention
justified
whether
state
prosecution
pending
intervention
cases
interfere
normal
enforcement
state
criminal
law
constitutional
means
necessarily
require
decision
constitutionality
state
statute
simply
prevents
particular
unconstitutional
use
state
criminal
law
bad
faith
federal
plaintiff
douglas
city
jeannette
supra
person
immunity
state
prosecution
brought
lawfully
good
faith
entitled
federal
relief
state
prosecution
amounts
harassment
situation
different
plaintiff
seeks
federal
intervention
ground
state
statute
unconstitutional
allege
facts
showing
harassment
cases
sort
whatever
provision
claim
unconstitutionality
rests
justification
intervention
individuals
able
exercise
constitutional
rights
without
running
risk
becoming
lawbreakers
justification
applies
full
force
continuing
live
controversy
federal
intervention
sought
state
prosecution
statute
may
tested
however
federal
intervention
sought
state
prosecution
commenced
pending
interests
protected
federal
intervention
must
weighed
broad
countervailing
principles
federalism
pending
state
proceeding
ordinarily
provides
existent
concrete
opportunity
secure
vindication
constitutional
claims
state
courts
ultimate
review
situation
collateral
resort
federal
speed
resolution
controversy
since
come
end
event
state
litigation
concluded
moreover
federal
intervention
may
disrupt
state
proceeding
issuance
necessary
stays
burdensome
necessity
parties
proceed
two
courts
simultaneously
federal
adjudication
matters
issue
state
proceeding
may
otherwise
unwarranted
unseemly
duplication
state
adjudicative
process
reasons
federal
courts
ordinarily
intervene
way
either
declaratory
injunctive
relief
cases
state
prosecution
exists
began
federal
suit
filed
federal
plaintiff
alleges
state
statute
applied
unconstitutional
cf
brillhart
excess
ins
wright
supra
interests
served
federal
intervention
context
plainly
outweighed
principles
comity
essential
federal
system
state
proceeding
pending
federal
intervention
therefore
appropriate
federal
must
decide
requested
forms
relief
granted
ordinarily
declaratory
judgment
appropriate
requirements
article
iii
met
narrow
special
factors
warranting
federal
abstention
absent
declaration
serve
useful
purpose
resolving
dispute
see
generally
zwickler
koota
supra
golden
zwickler
supra
general
rule
carries
unambiguous
intention
congress
expressed
federal
declaratory
judgment
act
reflected
committee
reports
supra
propriety
injunction
considered
separately
light
traditional
requirements
equity
jurisprudence
applied
protection
constitutional
rights
see
douglas
city
jeannette
supra
ex
parte
young
supra
dombrowski
pfister
supra
cameron
johnson
supra
zwickler
koota
supra
see
also
hart
wechsler
supra
follows
statement
today
samuels
mackell
cases
state
criminal
prosecution
pending
equitable
principles
relevant
propriety
injunction
must
taken
consideration
determining
whether
issue
declaratory
judgment
injunction
impermissible
declaratory
relief
ordinarily
denied
well
applicable
determining
whether
issue
declaratory
judgment
case
state
criminal
prosecution
pending
applicability
precluded
nature
remedy
created
federal
declaratory
judgment
act
decisions
act
culminating
zwickler
koota
supra
establish
considerations
governing
grant
declaratory
judgment
quite
different
governing
grant
injunction
even
though
forms
relief
discretionary
thus
broad
sense
term
equitable
nature
application
mackell
statement
criminal
prosecution
pending
run
counter
decision
term
wisconsin
constantineau
decided
january
flatly
rejected
proposition
federal
courts
stay
hand
state
courts
asked
pass
statute
clearly
unconstitutional
face
said
congress
course
routed
federal
constitutional
questions
state
systems
saving
final
say
came
review
state
judgments
first
congress
first
judiciary
act
stat
resolved
differently
created
federal
system
time
granted
federal
courts
various
heads
jurisdiction
today
involve
federal
constitutional
rights
negate
history
enlargement
jurisdiction
federal
district
courts
held
federal
stay
hand
decide
question
state
courts
decided
effects
injunctive
declaratory
relief
impact
administration
state
criminal
laws
different
see
generally
kennedy
injunction
barring
enforcement
criminal
statute
particular
conduct
immunizes
conduct
prosecution
statute
broad
injunction
enforcement
statute
paralyzes
state
enforcement
machinery
statute
rendered
nullity
declaratory
judgment
hand
merely
declaration
legal
status
rights
neither
mandates
prohibits
state
action
see
flemming
nestor
currie
district
constitutional
litigation
chi
rev
course
favorable
declaratory
judgment
may
nevertheless
valuable
plaintiff
though
make
even
unconstitutional
statute
disappear
state
statute
may
declared
unconstitutional
toto
incapable
constitutional
applications
may
declared
unconstitutionally
vague
overbroad
incapable
constitutionally
applied
full
extent
purport
either
case
federal
declaration
unconstitutionality
reflects
opinion
federal
statute
fully
enforced
declaration
total
unconstitutionality
affirmed
follows
stands
ready
reverse
conviction
statute
declaration
partial
unconstitutionality
affirmed
implication
overturn
particular
applications
statute
statute
narrowly
construed
state
courts
incapable
constitutional
applications
accordingly
declaration
necessarily
bar
prosecutions
statute
broad
injunction
thus
highest
state
opportunity
give
statute
regulating
expression
narrowing
clarifying
construction
failed
later
federal
declares
statute
unconstitutionally
vague
overbroad
may
well
open
state
prosecutor
federal
decision
bring
prosecution
statute
reasonably
believes
defendant
conduct
constitutionally
protected
state
courts
may
give
statute
construction
yield
constitutionally
valid
conviction
even
declaration
unconstitutionality
reviewed
declaration
may
still
able
cut
deterrent
effect
unconstitutional
state
statute
persuasive
force
opinion
judgment
may
lead
state
prosecutors
courts
legislators
reconsider
respective
responsibilities
toward
statute
enforcement
policies
judicial
construction
may
changed
legislature
may
repeal
statute
start
anew
finally
federal
judgment
may
res
judicata
effect
though
point
free
difficulty
governing
rules
remain
developed
view
proper
workings
federal
system
clear
however
even
though
declaratory
judgment
force
effect
final
judgment
much
milder
form
relief
injunction
though
may
persuasive
ultimately
coercive
noncompliance
may
inappropriate
contempt
opinion
zwickler
koota
confirmed
considerations
governing
grant
two
remedies
quite
different
zwickler
koota
distinguished
prayer
injunction
prayer
declaratory
relief
held
squarely
district
erred
denying
declaratory
relief
ground
showing
special
circumstances
justify
injunctive
relief
expressly
held
request
declaratory
judgment
state
statute
overbroad
face
must
considered
independently
request
injunctive
relief
enforcement
statute
hold
federal
district
duty
decide
appropriateness
merits
declaratory
request
irrespective
conclusion
propriety
issuance
injunction
emphasis
added
see
also
malone
emmet
supp
md
great
lakes
huffman
contrary
conclusion
case
action
employers
declaration
state
unemployment
compensation
scheme
imposed
tax
upon
unconstitutional
congress
always
treated
judicial
interference
enforcement
tax
laws
subject
governed
unique
considerations
consistently
enforced
congressional
command
district
courts
shall
enjoin
suspend
restrain
assessment
levy
collection
tax
state
law
plain
speedy
efficient
remedy
may
courts
state
without
relying
particular
terms
statute
taken
underlying
policy
require
federal
courts
stay
completely
field
anticipatory
adjudication
tax
cases
long
adequate
remedy
otherwise
available
great
lakes
held
declaratory
relief
state
tax
unconstitutional
denied
federal
basis
ruling
since
congress
prohibited
federal
courts
enjoining
state
taxes
adequate
remedy
available
state
courts
declaratory
relief
also
withheld
public
service
utah
wycoff
douglas
dissenting
citation
omitted
thus
great
lakes
adhered
congressional
recognition
unique
considerations
presented
anticipatory
tax
litigation
ibid
statutes
barring
anticipatory
relief
federal
tax
cases
supp
express
exception
federal
taxes
make
entirely
clear
unique
considerations
basis
great
lakes
relate
much
considerations
federalism
peculiar
needs
tax
administration
cf
agricultural
adjustment
act
amendments
stat
amending
act
may
stat
contrast
statutory
counterpart
applicable
intervention
state
criminal
prosecutions
course
grant
denial
declaratory
judgment
matter
sound
judicial
discretion
standards
exercise
discretion
articulated
aetna
life
ins
haworth
supra
public
service
utah
wycoff
supra
zwickler
koota
supra
see
supra
federal
asked
declare
validity
invalidity
state
statute
discretion
exercised
light
relations
existing
system
government
judicial
tribunals
union
recognition
fact
public
good
requires
relations
disturbed
unnecessary
conflict
courts
equally
bound
guard
protect
rights
secured
constitution
ex
parte
royall
however
said
zwickler
koota
congress
imposed
duty
upon
levels
federal
judiciary
give
due
respect
suitor
choice
federal
forum
hearing
decision
federal
constitutional
claims
plainly
escape
duty
permissible
merely
state
courts
also
solemn
responsibility
equally
federal
courts
guard
enforce
protect
every
right
granted
secured
constitution
robb
connolly
doctrine
abstention
first
fashioned
sanctions
escape
narrowly
limited
special
circumstances
propper
clark
conclude
properly
exercised
discretion
issuing
declaratory
judgment
upon
constitutionality
bernard
parish
ordinance
also
agree
district
ordinance
unconstitutional
face
mortally
infected
vice
vagueness
appellants
assert
contrary
paragraphs
judgment
entered
august
reversed
judgment
respects
affirmed
appendix
opinion
brennan
louisiana
revised
statutes
annotated
obscenity
intentional
exposure
one
person
public
place
manner
part
sex
organ
may
seen
another
person
intent
arousing
sexual
desire
production
sale
exhibition
gift
advertisement
intent
primarily
appeal
prurient
interest
average
person
lewd
lascivious
filthy
sexually
indecent
written
composition
printed
composition
book
magazine
pamphlet
newspaper
story
paper
writing
phonograph
record
picture
drawing
motion
picture
film
figure
image
wire
tape
recording
written
printed
recorded
matter
sexually
indecent
character
may
may
require
mechanical
means
transmitted
auditory
visual
sensory
representations
sexually
indecent
character
possession
intent
sell
exhibit
give
advertise
pornographic
material
character
described
paragraph
intent
primarily
appeal
prurient
interest
average
person
performance
person
persons
presence
another
person
persons
intent
arousing
sexual
desire
lewd
lascivious
sexually
indecent
dancing
lewd
lascivious
sexually
indecent
posing
lewd
lascivious
sexually
indecent
body
movement
solicitation
attempt
entice
unmarried
person
age
seventeen
years
commit
act
prohibited
section
requirement
person
condition
sale
allocation
consignment
delivery
resale
paper
magazine
book
periodical
publication
purchaser
consignee
purchaser
consignee
receive
resale
article
book
publication
reasonably
believed
purchaser
consignee
contain
articles
material
kind
description
designed
intended
reasonably
calculated
fact
appeal
prurient
interests
average
person
community
judged
contemporary
community
standards
denying
threatening
deny
franchise
impose
penalty
financial
otherwise
reason
failure
person
accept
articles
things
reason
return
thereof
display
nude
pictures
man
woman
boy
girl
public
place
except
works
art
exhibited
art
galleries
prosecutions
obscenity
lack
knowledge
age
marital
status
shall
constitute
defense
whoever
commits
crime
obscenity
shall
fined
less
one
hundred
dollars
five
hundred
dollars
imprisoned
six
months
violation
paragraphs
subsection
section
presence
unmarried
person
age
seventeen
years
offender
shall
fined
one
thousand
dollars
imprisoned
five
years
without
hard
labor
amended
acts
acts
acts
acts
emerg
eff
july
police
jury
bernard
parish
bernard
courthouse
annex
chalmette
louisiana
motion
celestine
melerine
seconded
joseph
papania
upon
recommendation
district
attorney
parish
bernard
following
ordinance
adopted
ordinance
section
offense
obscenity
defined
prohibited
section
ordained
police
jury
parish
bernard
obscenity
prohibited
hereby
defined
intentional
section
ordained
public
personal
exposure
female
breast
sexual
organs
fundament
person
either
sex
section
ordained
production
sale
exhibition
possession
intent
display
distribution
obscene
lewd
lascivious
prurient
sexually
indecent
print
advertisement
picture
photograph
written
printed
composition
model
statute
instrument
motion
picture
drawing
phonograph
recording
tape
wire
recording
device
material
kind
section
ordained
performance
dance
song
act
public
place
public
manner
representing
portraying
reasonably
calculated
represent
portray
act
sexual
intercourse
male
female
persons
act
perverse
sexual
intercourse
contact
unnatural
carnal
copulation
persons
sex
persons
animals
section
performance
public
place
public
manner
obscene
lewd
lustful
lascivious
prurient
sexually
indecent
dance
rendition
obscene
lewd
lustful
lascivious
prurient
sexually
indecent
song
recitation
section
ordained
production
possession
intent
display
exhibition
distribution
sale
literature
defined
herein
containing
one
pictures
nude
female
persons
wherein
female
breast
sexual
organ
shown
exhibited
number
manner
portrayal
pictures
displayed
literature
designed
appeal
predominantly
prurient
interest
section
ordained
shall
also
unlawful
person
attempt
commit
violations
set
forth
section
section
ordained
person
upon
conviction
violation
section
shall
sentenced
serve
ninety
days
pay
fine
one
hundred
dollars
discretion
ordained
persons
convicted
attempt
violate
section
shall
sentenced
maximum
penalty
prescribed
pay
half
maximum
fine
set
forth
section
ordained
word
literature
used
herein
means
includes
book
booklet
pamphlet
leaflet
brochure
circular
folder
handbill
magazine
word
picture
used
herein
means
includes
photograph
lithograph
drawing
sketch
abstract
poster
painting
figure
image
silhouette
representation
facsimile
section
ordained
ordinance
shall
published
official
journal
parish
bernard
voice
ordinance
submitted
vote
vote
thereon
follows
yeas
henry
schindler
joseph
papania
peter
huff
peter
perniciaro
louis
munster
john
booth
claude
mumphrey
celestine
melerine
edward
jeanfreau
blanche
molero
nays
none
absent
none
ordinance
declared
adopted
day
november
valentine
riess
valentine
riess
president
joseph
sorci
joseph
sorci
secretary
certificate
witness
hand
seal
bernard
parish
police
jury
day
february
mcdougall
mcdougall
secretary
full
text
follows
except
otherwise
provided
law
party
may
appeal
order
granting
denying
notice
hearing
interlocutory
permanent
injunction
civil
action
suit
proceeding
required
act
congress
heard
determined
district
three
judges
contrary
view
necessity
hearing
prior
arrest
obscenity
see
milky
way
productions
leary
supp
sdny
aff
flast
cohen
zemel
rusk
georgia
pub
serv
florida
lime
growers
jacobsen
milky
way
productions
leary
despite
order
return
seized
materials
appellants
without
evidence
prosecute
appellee
ledesma
evidence
obtained
night
january
seized
materials
parties
stipulated
hearing
immediately
sheriff
officer
arrested
ledesma
officer
purchased
two
allegedly
obscene
magazines
ledesma
another
officer
purchased
two
different
publications
district
expressly
excepted
purchased
publications
ordered
returned
saying
course
appellants
ordered
return
purchased
materials
instance
seized
since
title
thereto
passed
act
originally
applied
interlocutory
injunctions
enforcement
state
statutes
see
stat
amendment
extended
requirements
interlocutory
injunctions
enforcement
state
administrative
orders
act
march
stat
judiciary
act
extended
requirement
permanent
injunctions
stat
however
smith
wilson
held
requirement
applied
application
permanent
injunction
coupled
application
interlocutory
injunction
revision
statute
made
requirement
applicable
requests
either
interlocutory
permanent
relief
whether
form
relief
sought
act
june
stat
congress
dealt
another
major
defect
federal
injunction
procedure
injunction
suits
commonly
instituted
federal
shortly
enactment
complex
state
regulatory
measures
prior
construction
state
courts
result
one
case
federal
gave
initial
construction
state
statute
basis
construction
adjudicated
constitutionality
thereby
excluding
state
courts
altogether
see
generally
lockwood
maw
rosenberry
use
federal
injunction
constitutional
litigation
harv
rev
remedy
provided
congress
stat
currently
codified
provides
pertinent
part
district
three
judges
shall
final
hearing
stay
action
pending
therein
enjoin
suspend
restrain
enforcement
execution
state
statute
order
thereunder
whenever
appears
state
competent
jurisdiction
stayed
proceedings
statute
order
pending
determination
state
action
enforce
action
state
prosecuted
diligently
good
faith
district
three
judges
may
vacate
stay
hearing
upon
ten
days
notice
served
upon
attorney
general
state
statute
proved
largely
ineffectual
principally
stay
requirement
protects
constitutional
interests
federal
plaintiffs
see
hart
wechsler
supra
hutcheson
supra
lockwood
maw
rosenberry
supra
however
cases
construction
complex
state
regulatory
law
critical
constitutional
decision
federal
courts
developed
techniques
securing
state
consideration
issues
state
law
see
prentis
atlantic
coast
line
railroad
texas
pullman
narrow
scope
doctrine
federal
abstention
delineated
zwickler
koota
see
also
ali
study
division
jurisdiction
state
federal
courts
pp
note
abstention
justice
frankfurter
doctrine
activist
era
harv
rev
american
law
institute
comments
connection
proposed
codification
abstention
doctrine
observes
suits
claimed
state
legislative
administrative
action
invalid
contrary
controlling
federal
law
present
especially
appealing
case
original
federal
jurisdiction
danger
state
hostility
federal
claim
greatest
suits
jurisdiction
federal
courts
hear
cases
established
least
since
ex
parte
young
rightly
observed
distinguished
judge
authority
finality
ex
parte
young
hardly
overestimated
hutcheson
case
three
judges
harv
rev
citation
omitted
ali
study
division
jurisdiction
state
federal
courts
congress
accepted
basic
principles
ex
parte
young
promulgated
new
rules
practice
federal
equity
removed
many
objections
equity
procedure
see
particular
rule
put
one
side
question
presented
ex
parte
young
case
whether
federal
relief
proper
state
prosecution
pending
time
federal
hearing
begun
federal
suit
filed
declaratory
relief
available
whether
conduct
inhibited
expressive
conduct
alleged
protected
constitution
course
special
sensitivity
importance
first
amendment
rights
sensitivity
chilling
necessary
consideration
evaluating
claim
inhibition
deterrence
emanating
existence
statute
purporting
prohibit
constitutionally
protected
expression
plainly
inconsistent
first
amendment
zwickler
koota
baggett
bullitt
intended
protect
vigorous
robust
unpopular
speech
without
threat
punishment
state
law
see
whitney
california
brandeis
concurring
stromberg
california
roth
naacp
button
new
york
times
sullivan
harassment
course
take
many
forms
including
arrests
prosecutions
valid
statutes
reasonable
hope
obtaining
conviction
see
cameron
johnson
supra
pattern
discriminatory
enforcement
designed
inhibit
exercise
federal
rights
see
bailey
patterson
cf
ali
study
division
jurisdiction
state
federal
courts
pp
federal
declaratory
judgment
prize
winner
race
courthouses
rather
declaration
rights
obviates
need
risk
state
criminal
proceeding
race
courthouses
within
limits
art
iii
see
golden
zwickler
doctrines
ripeness
fashioned
give
adequate
room
kind
relief
title
independent
basis
federal
jurisdiction
plaintiff
seeks
vindication
constitutional
rights
provision
invoked
together
exhaustion
state
remedies
required
mcneese
board
education
federal
abstention
particularly
inappropriate
cases
brought
statutes
designed
specifically
authorize
federal
protection
civil
rights
professor
wechsler
stated
congress
declared
historic
judgment
within
precious
area
slightest
risk
nullification
state
process
danger
unhappily
past
moving
wrong
direction
reduce
jurisdiction
field
interest
state
smaller
cases
interest
outweighed
factors
highest
national
concern
wechsler
federal
jurisdiction
revision
judicial
code
law
contemp
prob
whether
context
bars
injunctive
relief
need
consider
since
injunction
consider
types
relief
available
cases
harassment
discussed
supra
senate
report
noted
declaratory
judgment
final
binding
judgment
adversary
parties
conclusively
determines
rights
view
federal
duty
render
declaratory
judgment
less
whatever
may
res
judicata
effect
parties
litigation
axes
government
prompt
certain
availability
imperious
need
time
mind
therefore
sovereign
resorted
drastic
means
collection
bull
see
also
bank
commerce
tennessee
phillips
commissioner
justice
brandeis
said
adequate
opportunity
afforded
later
judicial
determination
legal
rights
summary
proceedings
secure
prompt
performance
pecuniary
obligations
government
consistently
sustained
property
rights
must
yield
provisionally
governmental
need
thus
protection
life
liberty
administrative
action
alleged
illegal
may
obtained
promptly
writ
habeas
corpus
statutory
prohibition
suit
purpose
restraining
assessment
collection
tax
postpones
redress
alleged
invasion
property
rights
citations
omitted
cf
matthews
rodgers
special
reasons
justifying
policy
federal
noninterference
state
tax
collection
obvious
procedures
mass
assessment
collection
state
taxes
administration
adjudication
taxpayers
disputes
tax
officials
generally
complex
necessarily
designed
operate
according
established
rules
state
tax
agencies
organized
discharge
responsibilities
accordance
state
procedures
federal
declaratory
relief
available
test
state
tax
assessments
state
tax
administration
might
thrown
disarray
taxpayers
might
escape
ordinary
procedural
requirements
imposed
state
law
pendency
federal
suit
collection
revenue
challenged
law
might
obstructed
consequent
damage
state
budget
perhaps
shift
state
risk
taxpayer
insolvency
moreover
federal
constitutional
issues
likely
turn
questions
state
tax
law
like
issues
state
regulatory
law
properly
heard
state
courts
see
generally
sess
considerations
make
clear
underlying
policy
statute
relied
great
lakes
bars
anticipatory
federal
adjudication
field
merely
federal
injunctions
different
considerations
apply
context
state
criminal
statutes
challenged
unconstitutional
issue
one
side
fundamental
personal
rights
property
rights
risk
current
financing
state
government
future
enforcement
particular
criminal
statute
title
certainly
analogous
prohibition
federal
anticipatory
relief
tax
cases
statute
applies
pending
state
proceeding
dombrowski
pfister
whereas
present
discussion
concerns
propriety
federal
relief
state
proceeding
pending
moreover
unlike
tax
statutes
directed
particular
class
litigation
criminal
otherwise
designed
protect
process
orderly
state
adjudication
generally
congress
wanted
protect
particular
categories
state
business
anticipatory
federal
intervention
known
say
see
statute
applies
state
criminal
law
administration
finally
federal
declaratory
judgment
act
plainly
evinces
congressional
intent
statutory
term
injunction
read
include
declaratory
judgments
analogous
question
us
recently
mitchell
donovan
called
decide
whether
order
granting
denying
declaratory
judgment
may
appealed
provides
certain
exceptions
party
may
appeal
order
granting
denying
injunction
civil
action
required
determined
district
three
judges
emphasis
added
provision
obviously
reflects
particular
sensitivity
granting
denying
injunction
important
cases
required
heard
courts
see
generally
currie
district
constitutional
litigation
chi
rev
clearly
considerations
mind
observed
similarities
injunctions
declaratory
judgments
also
important
differences
jurisdiction
literally
construed
hardly
faithful
construction
read
statutory
term
injunction
meaning
declaratory
judgment